Methods for improving the erosion resistance of composite airfoils are disclosed as are the resultant structures. Wire mesh materials are coated with an erosion-resistant coating, formed to the shape of the airfoil leading edge, and molded into the leading edge during airfoil fabrication.

Patent
   5449273
Priority
Mar 21 1994
Filed
Mar 21 1994
Issued
Sep 12 1995
Expiry
Mar 21 2014
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
56
33
all paid
5. A composite airfoil which is resistant to foreign object damage comprising a metallic mesh molded about its leading edge, said metallic mesh having an erosion-resistant coating thereon, such that the mesh has an open construction at its interstices after the erosion-resistant coating is applied to the mesh prior to molding.
1. A method of making an erosion-resistant airfoil comprising the steps of impregnating the airfoil with resin, applying an erosion-resistant coating to a mesh prior to applying the mesh to the airfoil, thereby producing a coated mesh, the mesh having an open construction at its interstices after the erosion-resistant coating is applied, forming said coated mesh to contour about a leading edge of the airfoil, and integrally molding the mesh into the airfoil whereby the resin infiltrates from the airfoil through the mesh to secure the mesh to the airfoil.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein said erosion-resistant coating is electroless nickel.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein said erosion-resistant coating is electrolytic nickel.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein said electrolytic nickel is about 0.1 mils to 5.0 mils thick.

This invention relates to composites, and more particularly to a method for improving the erosion resistance of composite components employed in gas turbine engines.

Engine weight is an important factor when considering the overall cost and performance of a gas turbine engine. For many years attempts have been made to decrease the overall weight of the engine while maintaining or improving engine performance. One manner in which researchers have attempted to reduce the overall weight of the engine is by utilizing composite airfoils in place of the metal airfoils currently employed in most gas turbine engines. Composite airfoils offer a significant weight savings over metal airfoils, however, composite materials have inherently poor resistance to foreign object damage (FOD).

Many types of foreign objects may be entrained in the inlet airflow of an aircraft gas turbine engine ranging from large birds, such as sea gulls, to hailstones, rain, sand, and dust. Damage from foreign objects generally takes two forms. Smaller objects can erode the blade material, causing the aerodynamic shape to change, and degrade the performance of the compressor. Impact by larger leading edge objects can dent or deform the blades. Portions of an impacted blade can also be torn loose and cause secondary damage to downstream blades and other engine components.

The consequences of foreign object damage are greatest in the fan and low pressure compressor sections of turbine engines. However, these components offer the greatest potential in weight reduction due to their large tip diameters, as great as eight feet, and spans in the order of two or more feet.

The vulnerability of composite blades to foreign object damage is due to two factors. First the lightweight matrix materials employed, generally polymeric resins or metals such as aluminum, are relatively soft and do not have high tensile strengths. Second, the high-strength filaments employed in such composites are relatively hard and brittle. As a result, the matrix material is subject to erosion and the fibers are subject to breakage upon foreign object impact.

From this it would appear that some sort of protection system should be provided for these composite blades and vanes. Many such protection systems have been proposed. They include claddings of various compositions applied to the leading edge portion of the entire surface of the blade. One proposed cladding system involves fixing a solid metal sheath over the leading edge of the blade. This procedure, however, requires expensive forming operations and the sheath must ultimately be adhesively bonded to the airfoil as a secondary operation after airfoil manufacture. This process proves to be both costly and time consuming. In addition, solid metal sheaths require stringent surface preparation and priming prior to adhesive bonding, and are subject to environmental degradation of the adhesive bond when in operation. This naturally reduces the life of the protected composite airfoil.

Another proposed method for protecting the leading edge of composite blades and vanes is disclosed and claimed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,892,612, Method for Fabricating Foreign Object Damage Protection for Rotor Blades, Carlson et al. The disclosed and claimed method of U.S. Pat. No. 3,892,612 is directed to a complicated method of applying a protective metal coating to a non-conductive substrate which comprises the steps of (i) incorporating a woven wire mesh into the substrate, by means of a bonding agent which fills the interstices of the mesh, and then abrading the outer surface of the mesh layer to remove the adhesive from its nubs; (ii) applying a thin conductive layer to the bonding agent in the interstices of the mesh with the mesh nubs free of the thin conductive layer; and (iii) electrolytically depositing a metal coating on the wire mesh/conductive layer surface to obtain an essentially uniform thickness coating forming a metallic strip. The above steps are both complicated and time consuming. In addition, it is noted in a later U.S. Pat. No. 4,006,999 entitled, Leading Edge Protection for Composite Blades, Brantley et al., that a metallic strip leading edge protection created by the aforementioned method has demonstrated problems with delamination when impacted by medium-sized birds. This problem, according to the assignee, can result in secondary engine damage as the leading edge protection strip is ingested through the engine and, in addition, engine imbalance at high speeds can cause further damage.

It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved method for protecting the leading edge of a composite blade against foreign object damage, such method being both cost-effective and easy to implement.

It is another object of the present invention to produce an improved method for providing durable protection for the leading edge of a composite airfoil so as to increase both the reliability and the longevity of the composite blade.

According to the present invention, a composite airfoil is made resistant to erosion and foreign object damage by a process which includes applying an erosion resistant coating to a mesh, conforming the coated mesh to the desired airfoil contour, and integrally molding the coated mesh into the composite airfoil so as to protect the aerodynamic shape and useful life of the airfoil. The mesh may be metal and should maintain an open construction at its interstices after the erosion resistant coating is applied, prior to molding. Keeping an open construction allows for resin infiltration from the composite lay-up during molding and provides a strong, durable, mechanical interlock between the composite and the mesh.

The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become ore apparent in the light of the following detailed description of exemplary embodiments thereof, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.

The FIGURE is a perspective view illustrating a composite airfoil with leading edge protection made in accordance with the present invention.

Referring now to the FIGURE, a composite airfoil 10, in accordance with the present invention, includes a coated mesh 12 adjacent with the exterior portion of leading edge 14, the coated mesh being contoured abut the leading edge 14 of the airfoil 10 to protect the leading edge 14 against foreign object damage. This invention comprises the method for making the composite airfoil 10 with the coated mesh 12 leading edge 14 protection.

The method of this invention comprises the steps of applying an erosion-resistant coating to a mesh, conforming the coated mesh to the desired airfoil contour, and then integrally molding the coated mesh to the composite airfoil so as to protect the airfoil from erosion and other foreign object damage while also maintaining the aerodynamic shape of the airfoil.

In carrying out this invention, the mesh is preferably made of a material, such as stainless-steel, which is strong enough to provide the leading edge with enhanced protection against erosion, yet sufficiently pliant, and ductile, so as to be formable about the airfoil's leading edge, and to which an erosion-resistant coating will adhere. However, any other sufficiently strong and pliant material, such as carbon fibers, to which the erosion-resistant coating will adhere, may also be utilized.

One type of wire mesh useful with the present invention is a square, plain weave pattern mesh, although other types of mesh may also be utilized. In this type of mesh substantially parallel lengthwise wires are relatively perpendicular to substantially parallel crosswise wires. The lengthwise wires are typically referred to as warp wires, while the crosswise wires are typically referred to as weft wires. The warp wires pass over and then under successive weft wires and continue in an over one, under one pattern. A void area is formed by the intersection of two adjacent parallel warp wires with two adjacent parallel weft wires. This void area is useful because during the molding process resin infiltrates from the composite through the mesh voids to provide a strong, durable, mechanical interlock between the composite and the mesh. To provide the mesh with good mechanical strength without interfering with aerodynamic flow once the mesh is in place, the diameter of both the warp and weft wires should be in the range of about 3.0 mils to 5.0 mils, with about 4.5 mils being the preferred wire diameter. The above-described plain weave pattern mesh is known to those skilled in the art as a Plain Dutch Weave and may be purchased from a variety of companies, including INA Filtration Corporation of South Carolina.

Prior to securing the mesh to the composite airfoil the mesh is formed to the approximate contour of the leading edge and is coated with an erosion-resistant coating. If the coating is sufficiently ductile the mesh may be coated first and then formed to the approximate contour of the leading edge. If the mesh contains more weft wires than warp wires then it is preferred that the mesh be formed so that its warp wires will lie longitudinally along the airfoil's leading edge when the mesh is integrally molded to the airfoil.

The mesh is then coated on at least one side, with an erosion-resistant coating, such as electrolytic or electroless nickel, to a thickness of about 0.1 mils to 5.0 mils, with the preferred thickness being about 1.0 mils to 2.0 mils. Both sides of the mesh may be coated, but the side of the mesh which is placed in contact with the airfoil need not be coated. Other erosion-resistant coatings, such as titanium nitride and titanium diboride, which can be applied to a thickness of 0.1 mils to 5.0 mils in order to improve the mesh's durability, without adding excess weight or impacting the aerodynamic shape of the airfoil. When coating the mesh it is important to keep the void areas open, because during the molding process resin infiltrates from the composite airfoil, through the mesh to secure the mesh to the airfoil.

After the mesh is coated it is placed around the lay-up of a composite material which is impregnated with resin, and is formed and secured to the finished airfoil contour by compression molding. During compression molding resin infiltrates from the composite lay-up through the void areas of the mesh and provides a strong, durable interlock between the composite and the wire mesh. This eliminates the need for adhesive bonding which often involves stringent surface preparation and priming procedures of the mesh and/or airfoil.

Although this invention has been shown and described with respect to detailed embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail thereof may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed invention. For example, while the invention is described with respect to compression molding, it will be understood that other composite processing methods such as resin transfer molding (RTM) and autoclave molding may be utilized.

Lomasney, Gary M., Watson, Charles R., Hertel, Christopher J., Blecherman, Sol S.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10294573, Feb 06 2012 RTX CORPORATION Electroformed sheath
10364823, Sep 30 2010 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Airfoil blade
10557038, May 24 2004 Hontek Corporation Erosion resistant coatings
10562241, Apr 05 2016 Rolls-Royce plc Fan blade and method of manufacturing a fan blade
10612386, Jul 17 2017 Rolls-Royce Corporation Apparatus for airfoil leading edge protection
10677259, May 06 2016 General Electric Company Apparatus and system for composite fan blade with fused metal lead edge
10746045, Oct 16 2018 General Electric Company Frangible gas turbine engine airfoil including a retaining member
10760428, Oct 16 2018 General Electric Company Frangible gas turbine engine airfoil
10837286, Oct 16 2018 General Electric Company Frangible gas turbine engine airfoil with chord reduction
11111815, Oct 16 2018 General Electric Company Frangible gas turbine engine airfoil with fusion cavities
11149558, Oct 16 2018 General Electric Company Frangible gas turbine engine airfoil with layup change
11162505, Dec 17 2013 NUOVO PIGNONE TECNOLOGIE S R L Impeller with protection elements and centrifugal compressor
11408291, Jul 27 2018 RTX CORPORATION Airfoil conformable membrane erosion coating
11434781, Oct 16 2018 General Electric Company Frangible gas turbine engine airfoil including an internal cavity
11668317, Jul 09 2021 General Electric Company Airfoil arrangement for a gas turbine engine utilizing a shape memory alloy
11674399, Jul 07 2021 General Electric Company Airfoil arrangement for a gas turbine engine utilizing a shape memory alloy
11725524, Mar 26 2021 General Electric Company; General Electric Company Polska Sp. Z o.o. Engine airfoil metal edge
11767607, Jul 13 2022 General Electric Company Method of depositing a metal layer on a component
11946391, Mar 11 2021 General Electric Company Turbine engine with composite airfoil having a non-metallic leading edge protective wrap
12091768, Jul 13 2022 General Electric Company Method of depositing a metal layer on a component
12116903, Jun 30 2021 General Electric Company Composite airfoils with frangible tips
12123324, Jul 30 2021 General Electric Company; General Electric Company Polska Sp. Z o.o. Engine airfoil metal edge
5938406, Apr 18 1997 Agilent Technologies, Inc Rotor for turbomolecular pump
5965240, May 29 1996 United Technologies Corporation Metal/composite
6341747, Oct 28 1999 United Technologies Corporation Nanocomposite layered airfoil
6607358, Jan 08 2002 General Electric Company Multi-component hybrid turbine blade
7186092, Jul 26 2004 General Electric Company Airfoil having improved impact and erosion resistance and method for preparing same
7435056, Feb 28 2006 Honeywell International Inc. Leading edge erosion protection for composite stator vanes
7581933, Jul 26 2004 General Electric Company Airfoil having improved impact and erosion resistance and method for preparing same
7736130, Jul 23 2007 General Electric Company Airfoil and method for protecting airfoil leading edge
7736745, May 24 2004 Hontek Corporation Abrasion resistant coatings
7780420, Nov 16 2006 Florida Turbine Technologies, Inc. Turbine blade with a foam metal leading or trailing edge
7789630, Jul 23 2007 General Electric Company Airfoil and method for protecting airfoil leading edge
8091227, Dec 14 2005 Hontek Corporation Method of repairing an airfoil surface
8124235, May 24 2004 Hontek Corporation Method of making matte airfoil coatings
8146865, Mar 30 2007 AIRBUS OPERATIONS S L Leading edge for aircraft made of reinforced composite material
8231958, Oct 09 2007 RTX CORPORATION Article and method for erosion resistant composite
8240046, Mar 24 2009 General Electric Company Methods for making near net shape airfoil leading edge protection
8376712, Jan 26 2010 RTX CORPORATION Fan airfoil sheath
8419374, Aug 14 2009 Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation Gas turbine engine composite blade
8557388, May 24 2004 Hontek Corporation Erosion resistant coatings for leading edges of airfoils
8642164, Sep 15 2011 RTX CORPORATION Composite substrates with predetermined porosities
8851421, Sep 01 2009 Rolls-Royce plc Aerofoil with erosion resistant leading edge
8851855, Jul 05 2010 Rolls-Royce plc Composite turbomachine blade
8956105, Dec 31 2008 Rolls-Royce North American Technologies, Inc. Turbine vane for gas turbine engine
9410438, Mar 08 2013 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Dual rotor blades having a metal leading airfoil and a trailing airfoil of a composite material for gas turbine engines
9427835, Feb 29 2012 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Nano-metal coated vane component for gas turbine engines and method of manufacturing same
9429029, Sep 30 2010 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Gas turbine blade and method of protecting same
9587645, Sep 30 2010 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Airfoil blade
9663663, May 24 2004 Hontek Corporation Airfoil leading edge coatings
9732232, May 24 2004 Hontek Corporation Abrasion resistant coatings
9770791, Dec 14 2005 Hontek Corporation Method for repairing an airfoil surface having an elastomeric protective coating
9797255, Dec 14 2011 NUOVO PIGNONE TECNOLOGIE S R L Rotary machine including a machine rotor with a composite impeller portion and a metal shaft portion
9810230, May 08 2009 NUOVO PIGNONE TECNOLOGIE S R L Impeller for a turbomachine and method for attaching a shroud to an impeller
9810235, Nov 23 2009 NUOVO PIGNONE TECNOLOGIE S R L Mold for a centrifugal impeller, mold inserts and method for building a centrifugal impeller
9816518, Nov 23 2009 NUOVO PIGNONE TECNOLOGIE S R L Centrifugal impeller and turbomachine
Patent Priority Assignee Title
1367132,
1674674,
1860557,
2161533,
2477375,
2644296,
2767461,
2897583,
2994124,
3041040,
3294366,
3572971,
3600103,
3602608,
3637325,
3645829,
3649865,
3701190,
3758234,
3762835,
3880727,
3883267,
3892612,
4000956, Dec 22 1975 General Electric Company Impact resistant blade
4006999, Jul 17 1975 The United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the Leading edge protection for composite blades
4111606, Dec 27 1976 United Technologies Corporation Composite rotor blade
4492522, Dec 24 1981 MTU Motoren-und Turbinen-Union Muenchen GmbH Blade for a fluid flow engine and method for manufacturing the blade
4795313, May 28 1986 Alsthom Protective tip for a titanium blade and a method of brazing such a tip
4944655, May 10 1988 MERZ, HERBER Propeller blade of a fiber-reinforced plastic material
5174024, Sep 17 1990 Tail rotor abrasive strip
5210944, Nov 13 1990 General Electric Company Method for making a gas turbine engine component
CA928637,
JP123786,
/////////////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Dec 14 1993LOMASNEY, GARY M United Technologies CorporationREQUEST FOR CORRECTION OF RECORDED ASSIGNMENT0075180924 pdf
Dec 14 1993LOMASNEY, GARY M SOHL, CHARLES E ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0069580001 pdf
Dec 17 1993WATSON, CHARLES R SOHL, CHARLES E ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0069580001 pdf
Dec 17 1993WATSON, CHARLES R United Technologies CorporationREQUEST FOR CORRECTION OF RECORDED ASSIGNMENT0075180924 pdf
Dec 20 1993HERTEL, CHRISTOPHER J SOHL, CHARLES E ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0069580001 pdf
Dec 20 1993BLECHERMAN, SOL S SOHL, CHARLES E ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0069580001 pdf
Dec 20 1993BLECHERMAN, SOL S United Technologies CorporationREQUEST FOR CORRECTION OF RECORDED ASSIGNMENT0075180924 pdf
Dec 20 1993HERTEL, CHRISTOPHER J United Technologies CorporationREQUEST FOR CORRECTION OF RECORDED ASSIGNMENT0075180924 pdf
Mar 08 1994HERTEL, CHRISTOPHER J United Technologies CorporationREQUEST FOR CORRECTION OF RECORDED ASSIGNMENT0075180937 pdf
Mar 08 1994WATSON, CHARLES R United Technologies CorporationREQUEST FOR CORRECTION OF RECORDED ASSIGNMENT0075180937 pdf
Mar 08 1994WATSON, CHARLES R SOHL, CHARLES E ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0069580022 pdf
Mar 08 1994HERTEL, CHRISTOPHER J SOHL, CHARLES E ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0069580022 pdf
Mar 14 1994LOMASNEY, GARY M United Technologies CorporationREQUEST FOR CORRECTION OF RECORDED ASSIGNMENT0075180937 pdf
Mar 14 1994LOMASNEY, GARY M SOHL, CHARLES E ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0069580022 pdf
Mar 15 1994BLECHERMAN, SOL S SOHL, CHARLES E ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0069580022 pdf
Mar 15 1994BLECHERMAN, SOL S United Technologies CorporationREQUEST FOR CORRECTION OF RECORDED ASSIGNMENT0075180937 pdf
Mar 21 1994United Technologies Corporation(assignment on the face of the patent)
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Apr 06 1999REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Jul 14 1999M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Jul 14 1999M186: Surcharge for Late Payment, Large Entity.
Mar 03 2003M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Aug 15 2005ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Feb 20 2007M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Sep 12 19984 years fee payment window open
Mar 12 19996 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Sep 12 1999patent expiry (for year 4)
Sep 12 20012 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Sep 12 20028 years fee payment window open
Mar 12 20036 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Sep 12 2003patent expiry (for year 8)
Sep 12 20052 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Sep 12 200612 years fee payment window open
Mar 12 20076 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Sep 12 2007patent expiry (for year 12)
Sep 12 20092 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)