Methods for improving the erosion resistance of composite airfoils are disclosed as are the resultant structures. Wire mesh materials are coated with an erosion-resistant coating, formed to the shape of the airfoil leading edge, and molded into the leading edge during airfoil fabrication.
|
5. A composite airfoil which is resistant to foreign object damage comprising a metallic mesh molded about its leading edge, said metallic mesh having an erosion-resistant coating thereon, such that the mesh has an open construction at its interstices after the erosion-resistant coating is applied to the mesh prior to molding.
1. A method of making an erosion-resistant airfoil comprising the steps of impregnating the airfoil with resin, applying an erosion-resistant coating to a mesh prior to applying the mesh to the airfoil, thereby producing a coated mesh, the mesh having an open construction at its interstices after the erosion-resistant coating is applied, forming said coated mesh to contour about a leading edge of the airfoil, and integrally molding the mesh into the airfoil whereby the resin infiltrates from the airfoil through the mesh to secure the mesh to the airfoil.
4. The method of
|
This invention relates to composites, and more particularly to a method for improving the erosion resistance of composite components employed in gas turbine engines.
Engine weight is an important factor when considering the overall cost and performance of a gas turbine engine. For many years attempts have been made to decrease the overall weight of the engine while maintaining or improving engine performance. One manner in which researchers have attempted to reduce the overall weight of the engine is by utilizing composite airfoils in place of the metal airfoils currently employed in most gas turbine engines. Composite airfoils offer a significant weight savings over metal airfoils, however, composite materials have inherently poor resistance to foreign object damage (FOD).
Many types of foreign objects may be entrained in the inlet airflow of an aircraft gas turbine engine ranging from large birds, such as sea gulls, to hailstones, rain, sand, and dust. Damage from foreign objects generally takes two forms. Smaller objects can erode the blade material, causing the aerodynamic shape to change, and degrade the performance of the compressor. Impact by larger leading edge objects can dent or deform the blades. Portions of an impacted blade can also be torn loose and cause secondary damage to downstream blades and other engine components.
The consequences of foreign object damage are greatest in the fan and low pressure compressor sections of turbine engines. However, these components offer the greatest potential in weight reduction due to their large tip diameters, as great as eight feet, and spans in the order of two or more feet.
The vulnerability of composite blades to foreign object damage is due to two factors. First the lightweight matrix materials employed, generally polymeric resins or metals such as aluminum, are relatively soft and do not have high tensile strengths. Second, the high-strength filaments employed in such composites are relatively hard and brittle. As a result, the matrix material is subject to erosion and the fibers are subject to breakage upon foreign object impact.
From this it would appear that some sort of protection system should be provided for these composite blades and vanes. Many such protection systems have been proposed. They include claddings of various compositions applied to the leading edge portion of the entire surface of the blade. One proposed cladding system involves fixing a solid metal sheath over the leading edge of the blade. This procedure, however, requires expensive forming operations and the sheath must ultimately be adhesively bonded to the airfoil as a secondary operation after airfoil manufacture. This process proves to be both costly and time consuming. In addition, solid metal sheaths require stringent surface preparation and priming prior to adhesive bonding, and are subject to environmental degradation of the adhesive bond when in operation. This naturally reduces the life of the protected composite airfoil.
Another proposed method for protecting the leading edge of composite blades and vanes is disclosed and claimed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,892,612, Method for Fabricating Foreign Object Damage Protection for Rotor Blades, Carlson et al. The disclosed and claimed method of U.S. Pat. No. 3,892,612 is directed to a complicated method of applying a protective metal coating to a non-conductive substrate which comprises the steps of (i) incorporating a woven wire mesh into the substrate, by means of a bonding agent which fills the interstices of the mesh, and then abrading the outer surface of the mesh layer to remove the adhesive from its nubs; (ii) applying a thin conductive layer to the bonding agent in the interstices of the mesh with the mesh nubs free of the thin conductive layer; and (iii) electrolytically depositing a metal coating on the wire mesh/conductive layer surface to obtain an essentially uniform thickness coating forming a metallic strip. The above steps are both complicated and time consuming. In addition, it is noted in a later U.S. Pat. No. 4,006,999 entitled, Leading Edge Protection for Composite Blades, Brantley et al., that a metallic strip leading edge protection created by the aforementioned method has demonstrated problems with delamination when impacted by medium-sized birds. This problem, according to the assignee, can result in secondary engine damage as the leading edge protection strip is ingested through the engine and, in addition, engine imbalance at high speeds can cause further damage.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved method for protecting the leading edge of a composite blade against foreign object damage, such method being both cost-effective and easy to implement.
It is another object of the present invention to produce an improved method for providing durable protection for the leading edge of a composite airfoil so as to increase both the reliability and the longevity of the composite blade.
According to the present invention, a composite airfoil is made resistant to erosion and foreign object damage by a process which includes applying an erosion resistant coating to a mesh, conforming the coated mesh to the desired airfoil contour, and integrally molding the coated mesh into the composite airfoil so as to protect the aerodynamic shape and useful life of the airfoil. The mesh may be metal and should maintain an open construction at its interstices after the erosion resistant coating is applied, prior to molding. Keeping an open construction allows for resin infiltration from the composite lay-up during molding and provides a strong, durable, mechanical interlock between the composite and the mesh.
The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become ore apparent in the light of the following detailed description of exemplary embodiments thereof, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
The FIGURE is a perspective view illustrating a composite airfoil with leading edge protection made in accordance with the present invention.
Referring now to the FIGURE, a composite airfoil 10, in accordance with the present invention, includes a coated mesh 12 adjacent with the exterior portion of leading edge 14, the coated mesh being contoured abut the leading edge 14 of the airfoil 10 to protect the leading edge 14 against foreign object damage. This invention comprises the method for making the composite airfoil 10 with the coated mesh 12 leading edge 14 protection.
The method of this invention comprises the steps of applying an erosion-resistant coating to a mesh, conforming the coated mesh to the desired airfoil contour, and then integrally molding the coated mesh to the composite airfoil so as to protect the airfoil from erosion and other foreign object damage while also maintaining the aerodynamic shape of the airfoil.
In carrying out this invention, the mesh is preferably made of a material, such as stainless-steel, which is strong enough to provide the leading edge with enhanced protection against erosion, yet sufficiently pliant, and ductile, so as to be formable about the airfoil's leading edge, and to which an erosion-resistant coating will adhere. However, any other sufficiently strong and pliant material, such as carbon fibers, to which the erosion-resistant coating will adhere, may also be utilized.
One type of wire mesh useful with the present invention is a square, plain weave pattern mesh, although other types of mesh may also be utilized. In this type of mesh substantially parallel lengthwise wires are relatively perpendicular to substantially parallel crosswise wires. The lengthwise wires are typically referred to as warp wires, while the crosswise wires are typically referred to as weft wires. The warp wires pass over and then under successive weft wires and continue in an over one, under one pattern. A void area is formed by the intersection of two adjacent parallel warp wires with two adjacent parallel weft wires. This void area is useful because during the molding process resin infiltrates from the composite through the mesh voids to provide a strong, durable, mechanical interlock between the composite and the mesh. To provide the mesh with good mechanical strength without interfering with aerodynamic flow once the mesh is in place, the diameter of both the warp and weft wires should be in the range of about 3.0 mils to 5.0 mils, with about 4.5 mils being the preferred wire diameter. The above-described plain weave pattern mesh is known to those skilled in the art as a Plain Dutch Weave and may be purchased from a variety of companies, including INA Filtration Corporation of South Carolina.
Prior to securing the mesh to the composite airfoil the mesh is formed to the approximate contour of the leading edge and is coated with an erosion-resistant coating. If the coating is sufficiently ductile the mesh may be coated first and then formed to the approximate contour of the leading edge. If the mesh contains more weft wires than warp wires then it is preferred that the mesh be formed so that its warp wires will lie longitudinally along the airfoil's leading edge when the mesh is integrally molded to the airfoil.
The mesh is then coated on at least one side, with an erosion-resistant coating, such as electrolytic or electroless nickel, to a thickness of about 0.1 mils to 5.0 mils, with the preferred thickness being about 1.0 mils to 2.0 mils. Both sides of the mesh may be coated, but the side of the mesh which is placed in contact with the airfoil need not be coated. Other erosion-resistant coatings, such as titanium nitride and titanium diboride, which can be applied to a thickness of 0.1 mils to 5.0 mils in order to improve the mesh's durability, without adding excess weight or impacting the aerodynamic shape of the airfoil. When coating the mesh it is important to keep the void areas open, because during the molding process resin infiltrates from the composite airfoil, through the mesh to secure the mesh to the airfoil.
After the mesh is coated it is placed around the lay-up of a composite material which is impregnated with resin, and is formed and secured to the finished airfoil contour by compression molding. During compression molding resin infiltrates from the composite lay-up through the void areas of the mesh and provides a strong, durable interlock between the composite and the wire mesh. This eliminates the need for adhesive bonding which often involves stringent surface preparation and priming procedures of the mesh and/or airfoil.
Although this invention has been shown and described with respect to detailed embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail thereof may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed invention. For example, while the invention is described with respect to compression molding, it will be understood that other composite processing methods such as resin transfer molding (RTM) and autoclave molding may be utilized.
Lomasney, Gary M., Watson, Charles R., Hertel, Christopher J., Blecherman, Sol S.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10294573, | Feb 06 2012 | RTX CORPORATION | Electroformed sheath |
10364823, | Sep 30 2010 | Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. | Airfoil blade |
10557038, | May 24 2004 | Hontek Corporation | Erosion resistant coatings |
10562241, | Apr 05 2016 | Rolls-Royce plc | Fan blade and method of manufacturing a fan blade |
10612386, | Jul 17 2017 | Rolls-Royce Corporation | Apparatus for airfoil leading edge protection |
10677259, | May 06 2016 | General Electric Company | Apparatus and system for composite fan blade with fused metal lead edge |
10746045, | Oct 16 2018 | General Electric Company | Frangible gas turbine engine airfoil including a retaining member |
10760428, | Oct 16 2018 | General Electric Company | Frangible gas turbine engine airfoil |
10837286, | Oct 16 2018 | General Electric Company | Frangible gas turbine engine airfoil with chord reduction |
11111815, | Oct 16 2018 | General Electric Company | Frangible gas turbine engine airfoil with fusion cavities |
11149558, | Oct 16 2018 | General Electric Company | Frangible gas turbine engine airfoil with layup change |
11162505, | Dec 17 2013 | NUOVO PIGNONE TECNOLOGIE S R L | Impeller with protection elements and centrifugal compressor |
11408291, | Jul 27 2018 | RTX CORPORATION | Airfoil conformable membrane erosion coating |
11434781, | Oct 16 2018 | General Electric Company | Frangible gas turbine engine airfoil including an internal cavity |
11668317, | Jul 09 2021 | General Electric Company | Airfoil arrangement for a gas turbine engine utilizing a shape memory alloy |
11674399, | Jul 07 2021 | General Electric Company | Airfoil arrangement for a gas turbine engine utilizing a shape memory alloy |
11725524, | Mar 26 2021 | General Electric Company; General Electric Company Polska Sp. Z o.o. | Engine airfoil metal edge |
11767607, | Jul 13 2022 | General Electric Company | Method of depositing a metal layer on a component |
11946391, | Mar 11 2021 | General Electric Company | Turbine engine with composite airfoil having a non-metallic leading edge protective wrap |
12091768, | Jul 13 2022 | General Electric Company | Method of depositing a metal layer on a component |
12116903, | Jun 30 2021 | General Electric Company | Composite airfoils with frangible tips |
12123324, | Jul 30 2021 | General Electric Company; General Electric Company Polska Sp. Z o.o. | Engine airfoil metal edge |
5938406, | Apr 18 1997 | Agilent Technologies, Inc | Rotor for turbomolecular pump |
5965240, | May 29 1996 | United Technologies Corporation | Metal/composite |
6341747, | Oct 28 1999 | United Technologies Corporation | Nanocomposite layered airfoil |
6607358, | Jan 08 2002 | General Electric Company | Multi-component hybrid turbine blade |
7186092, | Jul 26 2004 | General Electric Company | Airfoil having improved impact and erosion resistance and method for preparing same |
7435056, | Feb 28 2006 | Honeywell International Inc. | Leading edge erosion protection for composite stator vanes |
7581933, | Jul 26 2004 | General Electric Company | Airfoil having improved impact and erosion resistance and method for preparing same |
7736130, | Jul 23 2007 | General Electric Company | Airfoil and method for protecting airfoil leading edge |
7736745, | May 24 2004 | Hontek Corporation | Abrasion resistant coatings |
7780420, | Nov 16 2006 | Florida Turbine Technologies, Inc. | Turbine blade with a foam metal leading or trailing edge |
7789630, | Jul 23 2007 | General Electric Company | Airfoil and method for protecting airfoil leading edge |
8091227, | Dec 14 2005 | Hontek Corporation | Method of repairing an airfoil surface |
8124235, | May 24 2004 | Hontek Corporation | Method of making matte airfoil coatings |
8146865, | Mar 30 2007 | AIRBUS OPERATIONS S L | Leading edge for aircraft made of reinforced composite material |
8231958, | Oct 09 2007 | RTX CORPORATION | Article and method for erosion resistant composite |
8240046, | Mar 24 2009 | General Electric Company | Methods for making near net shape airfoil leading edge protection |
8376712, | Jan 26 2010 | RTX CORPORATION | Fan airfoil sheath |
8419374, | Aug 14 2009 | Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation | Gas turbine engine composite blade |
8557388, | May 24 2004 | Hontek Corporation | Erosion resistant coatings for leading edges of airfoils |
8642164, | Sep 15 2011 | RTX CORPORATION | Composite substrates with predetermined porosities |
8851421, | Sep 01 2009 | Rolls-Royce plc | Aerofoil with erosion resistant leading edge |
8851855, | Jul 05 2010 | Rolls-Royce plc | Composite turbomachine blade |
8956105, | Dec 31 2008 | Rolls-Royce North American Technologies, Inc. | Turbine vane for gas turbine engine |
9410438, | Mar 08 2013 | Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. | Dual rotor blades having a metal leading airfoil and a trailing airfoil of a composite material for gas turbine engines |
9427835, | Feb 29 2012 | Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. | Nano-metal coated vane component for gas turbine engines and method of manufacturing same |
9429029, | Sep 30 2010 | Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. | Gas turbine blade and method of protecting same |
9587645, | Sep 30 2010 | Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. | Airfoil blade |
9663663, | May 24 2004 | Hontek Corporation | Airfoil leading edge coatings |
9732232, | May 24 2004 | Hontek Corporation | Abrasion resistant coatings |
9770791, | Dec 14 2005 | Hontek Corporation | Method for repairing an airfoil surface having an elastomeric protective coating |
9797255, | Dec 14 2011 | NUOVO PIGNONE TECNOLOGIE S R L | Rotary machine including a machine rotor with a composite impeller portion and a metal shaft portion |
9810230, | May 08 2009 | NUOVO PIGNONE TECNOLOGIE S R L | Impeller for a turbomachine and method for attaching a shroud to an impeller |
9810235, | Nov 23 2009 | NUOVO PIGNONE TECNOLOGIE S R L | Mold for a centrifugal impeller, mold inserts and method for building a centrifugal impeller |
9816518, | Nov 23 2009 | NUOVO PIGNONE TECNOLOGIE S R L | Centrifugal impeller and turbomachine |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
1367132, | |||
1674674, | |||
1860557, | |||
2161533, | |||
2477375, | |||
2644296, | |||
2767461, | |||
2897583, | |||
2994124, | |||
3041040, | |||
3294366, | |||
3572971, | |||
3600103, | |||
3602608, | |||
3637325, | |||
3645829, | |||
3649865, | |||
3701190, | |||
3758234, | |||
3762835, | |||
3880727, | |||
3883267, | |||
3892612, | |||
4000956, | Dec 22 1975 | General Electric Company | Impact resistant blade |
4006999, | Jul 17 1975 | The United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the | Leading edge protection for composite blades |
4111606, | Dec 27 1976 | United Technologies Corporation | Composite rotor blade |
4492522, | Dec 24 1981 | MTU Motoren-und Turbinen-Union Muenchen GmbH | Blade for a fluid flow engine and method for manufacturing the blade |
4795313, | May 28 1986 | Alsthom | Protective tip for a titanium blade and a method of brazing such a tip |
4944655, | May 10 1988 | MERZ, HERBER | Propeller blade of a fiber-reinforced plastic material |
5174024, | Sep 17 1990 | Tail rotor abrasive strip | |
5210944, | Nov 13 1990 | General Electric Company | Method for making a gas turbine engine component |
CA928637, | |||
JP123786, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Dec 14 1993 | LOMASNEY, GARY M | United Technologies Corporation | REQUEST FOR CORRECTION OF RECORDED ASSIGNMENT | 007518 | /0924 | |
Dec 14 1993 | LOMASNEY, GARY M | SOHL, CHARLES E | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 006958 | /0001 | |
Dec 17 1993 | WATSON, CHARLES R | SOHL, CHARLES E | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 006958 | /0001 | |
Dec 17 1993 | WATSON, CHARLES R | United Technologies Corporation | REQUEST FOR CORRECTION OF RECORDED ASSIGNMENT | 007518 | /0924 | |
Dec 20 1993 | HERTEL, CHRISTOPHER J | SOHL, CHARLES E | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 006958 | /0001 | |
Dec 20 1993 | BLECHERMAN, SOL S | SOHL, CHARLES E | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 006958 | /0001 | |
Dec 20 1993 | BLECHERMAN, SOL S | United Technologies Corporation | REQUEST FOR CORRECTION OF RECORDED ASSIGNMENT | 007518 | /0924 | |
Dec 20 1993 | HERTEL, CHRISTOPHER J | United Technologies Corporation | REQUEST FOR CORRECTION OF RECORDED ASSIGNMENT | 007518 | /0924 | |
Mar 08 1994 | HERTEL, CHRISTOPHER J | United Technologies Corporation | REQUEST FOR CORRECTION OF RECORDED ASSIGNMENT | 007518 | /0937 | |
Mar 08 1994 | WATSON, CHARLES R | United Technologies Corporation | REQUEST FOR CORRECTION OF RECORDED ASSIGNMENT | 007518 | /0937 | |
Mar 08 1994 | WATSON, CHARLES R | SOHL, CHARLES E | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 006958 | /0022 | |
Mar 08 1994 | HERTEL, CHRISTOPHER J | SOHL, CHARLES E | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 006958 | /0022 | |
Mar 14 1994 | LOMASNEY, GARY M | United Technologies Corporation | REQUEST FOR CORRECTION OF RECORDED ASSIGNMENT | 007518 | /0937 | |
Mar 14 1994 | LOMASNEY, GARY M | SOHL, CHARLES E | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 006958 | /0022 | |
Mar 15 1994 | BLECHERMAN, SOL S | SOHL, CHARLES E | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 006958 | /0022 | |
Mar 15 1994 | BLECHERMAN, SOL S | United Technologies Corporation | REQUEST FOR CORRECTION OF RECORDED ASSIGNMENT | 007518 | /0937 | |
Mar 21 1994 | United Technologies Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Apr 06 1999 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Jul 14 1999 | M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Jul 14 1999 | M186: Surcharge for Late Payment, Large Entity. |
Mar 03 2003 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Aug 15 2005 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Feb 20 2007 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Sep 12 1998 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Mar 12 1999 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 12 1999 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Sep 12 2001 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Sep 12 2002 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Mar 12 2003 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 12 2003 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Sep 12 2005 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Sep 12 2006 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Mar 12 2007 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 12 2007 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Sep 12 2009 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |