An ultrasonic diagnostic system is provided which detects the presence of coated microbubble contrast agents in the body of a patient by transmitting ultrasonic energy which causes the destruction of the coated microbubbles and detects the microbubble destruction through phase insensitive detection and differentiation of echoes received from two consecutive ultrasonic transmissions. The destruction of a microbubble can also be used as a point source of acoustic energy for aberration correction, whereby the timing of the beamformer is adjusted from an analysis of beamformer signals resulting from a detected microbubble destruction event.
|
1. A method for detecting the presence of a coated microbubble contrast agent in the body of a patient through ultrasonic interrogation comprising the steps of:
transmitting ultrasonic pulses into the body of a patient at an energy level sufficient to cause the destruction of coated microbubbles in the body; receiving the signals returned following each pulse transmission; detecting the signals received through phase insensitive detection; differentiating the detected signals received following two pulse transmissions on a spatial basis; and identifying signal differentiations which exceed a predetermined threshold as resulting from microbubble destruction events.
10. An ultrasonic diagnostic system for detecting the presence of a coated microbubble contrast agent in the body of a patient through ultrasonic interrogation comprising:
an ultrasonic transducer which transmits ultrasonic pulses into the body of a patient at an energy level sufficient to cause the destruction of coated microbubbles in the body, and which receives the acoustic signals returned following each pulse transmission and converts them to electrical echo signals; a phase insensitive detector for detecting said echo signals; a differentiator which differentiates on a spatial basis the detected echo signals resulting from two pulse transmissions; and means for identifying differentiated echo signals which exceed a threshold as resulting from microbubble destruction events.
17. An ultrasonic diagnostic system which utilizes a coated microbubble contrast agent for aberration correction comprising:
an ultrasonic transducer array which transmits ultrasonic pulses into the body of a patient at an energy level sufficient to cause the destruction of coated microbubbles in the body, and which receives the acoustic signals returned following each pulse transmission and converts them to electrical echo signals; a beamformer, coupled to said ultrasonic transducer array, for controlling the timing of pulse transmission by said transducer array and the timing of delays applied to said electrical echo signals; and a detector, coupled to said beamformer and responsive to said electrical echo signals, for detecting microbubble destruction events; and a beamformer timing check subsystem, coupled to said beamformer, for checking the timing of said beamformer in response to the detection of a microbubble destruction event.
2. The method of
3. The method of
4. The method of
counting the number of identified microbubble destruction events; and displaying an image which depicts the number of events counted.
5. The method of
6. The method of
7. The method of
displaying an ultrasonic image of the interior of the body of the patient; and displaying identified microbubble destruction events in correspondence with said ultrasonic image.
8. The method of
9. The method of
further comprising the step of checking the coincidence of said delayed signal components in response to the identification of a microbubble destruction event.
11. The ultrasonic diagnostic system of
12. The ultrasonic diagnostic system of
13. The ultrasonic diagnostic system of
an event counter for counting identified microbubble destruction events; and a display for displaying the count of said event counter.
14. The ultrasonic diagnostic system of
15. The ultrasonic diagnostic system of
an image display for concurrently displaying an ultrasonic image of the interior of the body of a patient and locations in said image corresponding to spatial locations of microbubble destruction events; and further comprising: means, coupled to said image display and responsive to the identification of a microbubble destruction event for displaying said event for a time greater than the duration of said event. 16. The ultrasonic diagnostic system of
a beamformer, coupled to the elements of said transducer and to said detector, for controlling the timing of pulse transmission by said transducer elements and the timing of delays applied to said electrical echo signals; and an aberration correction subsystem, responsive to the identification of a microbubble destruction event, and coupled to said beamformer for adjusting the timing of said beamformer.
18. The ultrasonic diagnostic system of
wherein said beamformer timing check subsystem includes means for adjusting said adjustable delays in response to the time coincidence of electrical echo signals of a microbubble destruction event which have been delayed by said beamformer delay channels.
|
This invention relates to improvements in the detection of ultrasonic contrast agents by ultrasonic diagnostic systems, and in particular to the detection and utilization of ultrasonic signals resulting from the use of contrast agents comprising coated microbubbles.
Ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system are capable of imaging and measuring the physiology within the body in a completely noninvasive manner. Ultrasonic waves are transmitted into the body from the surface of the skin and are reflected from tissue and cells within the body. The reflected echoes are received by the ultrasonic transducer and processed to produce an image or measurement of blood flow. Diagnosis is thereby possible with no intervention into the body of the patient.
However materials known as contrast agents can be introduced into the body to enhance ultrasonic diagnosis. Contrast agents are substances which will strongly interact with ultrasonic waves, such as by reflecting an increased amount of a transmitted ultrasonic wave as an echo. One substance which has been found to be especially useful as an ultrasonic contrast agent is air, in the form of tiny bubbles called microbubbles. Air bubbles are strong reflectors of ultrasonic energy due to the impedance mismatch of air and the material in which the bubbles are suspended. In order to infuse air into the body in a manner which will not harm the patient, and in a form in which the air will travel through the body and be expelled naturally, air has been suspended in solutions in the form of tiny microbubbles. Microbubble contrast agents are useful for imaging the body's vascular system, for instance, as the contrast agent can be injected into the bloodstream and will pass through the veins and arteries of the body with the blood supply until filtered from the blood stream in the kidneys and liver.
One type of microbubble contrast agent currently under investigation comprises coated microbubbles. The microbubbles of the contrast agent are covered with a thin biodegradable polymer coating or shell. The microbubbles have diameters between 0.1 and 4.0 μm and a specific density about 1/10 of the density of water. The coated microbubbles are suspended in an aqueous solution for infusion into the blood stream.
Coated microbubbles have the advantage of being stable in the body for a significant period of time, as the polymeric shell serves to preserve the microbubble. The size of the microbubbles is chosen to provide the property of resonance of the coated microbubbles when insonified with energy at ultrasonic frequencies. The resonance of the microbubbles is relatively easy to detect through ultrasonic Doppler interrogation.
At moderately high sound pressure amplitudes the response of the microbubbles to ultrasonic energy can further become nonlinear, causing the shells to rupture. This acoustically induced destruction and collapse of the microbubbles produces a high amplitude B-mode response and a strong Doppler response and a characteristically bright pattern in the color Doppler mode. Hence color Doppler is becoming the preferred modality for detecting the collapse of the hollow spheres of coated microbubble contrast agents.
The collapse of the coated microbubbles in response to an ultrasonic pulse is a sudden, almost instantaneous event, however. The echo response from the destruction of the microbubble shell will only be present following the single Doppler wave that causes the shell to collapse. In color Doppler interrogation, which is done by interrogating the patient with a series of ultrasonic pulses called an ensemble, the result of the microbubble rupture will be present during an Doppler interrogation period. The present inventors have noticed that while color Doppler can effectively detect these events, these transient responses can be confusingly similar to the response engendered by tissue moving inside the body, or motion by the ultrasonic probe itself. These conditions can create undesirable Doppler artifacts called flash, so named for the sudden flash of Doppler color produced by the probe or tissue motion. Flash artifacts are generally removed from Doppler signals prior to color flow processing, and this removal can also eliminate the signals received from collapsing bubbles. It would be desirable to be able to detect the result of a microbubble rupture in a manner by which the destruction of the microbubble would be clearly distinguishable from motion induced signals.
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, a diagnostic ultrasound system is provided for detection of rupturing coated microbubble contrast agents. Following infusion of the contrast agent into the body an area of the body containing the coated microbubbles is insonified with ultrasonic energy of a sufficient energy to rupture microbubbles in the path of the ultrasonic waves. Acoustic energy emanating from the sites of microbubble destruction is received by an ultrasonic transducer and the resultant signals detected by amplitude detection of the received signal waveform. The echoes received from a subsequent ultrasonic transmission are detected in the same manner and the signals from the two reception periods are differentiated on a spatial basis. In the illustrated embodiment the signals of the second reception period are subtracted from those of the first reception period. This differentiation will, following post processing including thresholding, reveal the signals emanating from the microbubble destruction events to the exclusion of other signals. A useful application of detection of microbubble collapse is aberration correction, by which the event signals from separate channels of an ultrasonic beamformer are compared for coherent timing and the time delays of the beamformer channels adjusted to compensate for aberrations in the ultrasonic transmission medium.
In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an ultrasonic diagnostic system constructed to detect the destruction of coated microbubbles in accordance with the principles of the present invention;
FIGS. 2a, 2b and 2c are waveforms illustrating the advantage of amplitude detection of microbubble destruction events;
FIG. 3 illustrates aberration correction of an ultrasonic beamformer through detection of a microbubble destruction event; and
FIG. 4 illustrates beamformer signals typical of the aberration correction arrangement of FIG. 3.
Referring first to FIG. 1, a block diagram of an ultrasonic diagnostic system constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention is shown. An ultrasonic probe includes an array 12 of ultrasonic transducers which transmit and receive ultrasonic energy. During transmission an ultrasonic beamformer 16 controls the timing of actuation of the separate elements of the array 12 and activates the transducer pulsers of a transmitter/receiver 14 at appropriate times to pulse the transducer element so that a steered and focused ultrasonic beam is produced. During reception ultrasonic echoes received by the transducer elements are received by separate receivers of the transmitter/receiver 14 and coupled to separate channels of the beamformer 16, where the signals are appropriately delayed then combined to form a sequence of coherent echo signals over the depth of reception in the body of the patient.
The coherent echo signals are quadrature demodulated by an I,Q demodulator 18 which produces quadrature I and Q signal components. The demodulated signal components are then amplitude detected by an envelope detector 20. The detected signals are filtered by a filter 22 to remove noise and other extraneous signal components. A first such sequence of detected echo signals is stored for subsequent use by a pulse to pulse differentiation subsystem 24.
A second such sequence is received and detected from the same direction and in the same manner as the first sequence. When the transmitted pulses are of sufficient intensity to cause any coated microbubbles in the path of the ultrasonic beams to rupture, and the pulses are transmitted over the same path in relatively rapid succession, the first pulse will cause the coated microbubbles to rupture, sending acoustic waves back to the transducer array where the waves are received and processed by the system. When the second pulse is transmitted a relatively short time thereafter there will be no signals emanating from the same locations where microbubbles were ruptured by the first pulse. The second sequence of echo signals is then subtracted on a spatial basis from the signals of the first sequence by the pulse to pulse differentiation subsystem 24. Echoes returning from stationary tissue in the path of the two beams will be reproduced substantially similarly in the two sequences and will cancel through subtraction. But the signals received during the first sequence from microbubble destruction events will not be canceled by corresponding signals in the second sequence. The results of the subtraction process are compared against a threshold level supplied by a threshold circuit 26, which will eliminate minor variations of echoes received from tissue and flowing fluids in the two sequences, leaving only the signals returned from the microbubble destruction events.
The detected microbubble destruction events may be further processed and displayed in a variety of ways. One way is to display this information on the basis of the number of events that have occurred in a given region of the body in a period of time. In FIG. 1 the pulse to pulse differentiation subsystem 24 is followed by an event counter 28 which counts microbubble destruction events along each beam path in the region scanned and computes the frequency of such events. The occurrence of a significant number of events in a period of time is indicated by highlighting the corresponding region of an image of the body with image brightness or color. For example, the coated microbubble contrast agent can be injected into the blood stream of a patient and an area of the vascular system such as the heart can be monitored in this manner. As the contrast agent begins flowing into the heart the ultrasonic scanning will begin to induce microbubble destruction and the chambers of the heart into which the contrast agent is flowing will be highlighted in brightness or color. A compound image similar to that of color flow imaging can be formed, in which a structural image of the heart is overlaid with color which spatially depicts the frequency of microbubble destruction events in the imaged areas of the heart.
Another display alternative is to display each microbubble destruction event in the image as it occurs. But since these events are essentially instantaneous events, a real time display will be too transitory to be diagnostically meaningful. To account for this fact, an image sustain subsystem 30 is provided which causes each displayed event to be sustained in an image for a period of time. Even though a single event occurs in response to a single ultrasonic pulse, the detected event persists on the image display for a substantial period of time. A user controls the persistence period to range from tenths of a second to more than a second, as preferences dictate. The sustained event display can be modulated as increasing brightness or colors, and can be overlaid with a structural image as discussed above. The event counter 28 and the image sustain subsystem 30 can be employed together for a sustained image display based on the frequency of events, or the two can be employed alternatively and separately. In either case the spatially defined event information is coupled to a scan converter 40 where it is arranged in a desired image format and overlaid with a structural (B-mode) image if desired, and the resulting image is displayed on a display 50.
The reason why amplitude detection of microbubble destruction events is to be preferred over Doppler signal processing may be understood by referring to FIGS. 2a, 2b and 2c. FIG. 2a shows a waveform 60 depicting a received Doppler waveform resulting from the motion of tissue inside the body, such as motion of the heart wall. Points A and B on the waveform indicate two points in time at which the phase of the waveform is sampled. FIG. 2b illustrates a second received Doppler waveform 60' which is sampled at the same two points in sampling time alignment with points A and B. This time alignment means that the second waveform 60' is not sampled at points A and B shown on the waveform, but at points A' and B'. It is seen that there is a considerable phase difference of the Doppler signal between the A samples and the B samples of the two waveforms.
But when the envelope of the Doppler waveforms 60 and 60' are detected the envelopes 62 and 62' will appear as shown in FIG. 2c. In this figure the waveform envelopes are shown in comparison to a reference level, VR. FIG. 2c shows that full wave envelope detection of the waveforms 60 and 60' will cause the sample values at points A and B to exhibit little amplitude difference, and that there is little difference between the amplitudes of envelopes 62 and 62' at the A and B sampling times. Hence the sharp waveform phase differences at points A and B will not be identified as a microbubble destruction events when amplitude detection is employed to detect such events. The difference required for detection of a microbubble destruction event is a substantial amplitude difference between the envelope levels at the respective sampling times. Thus, by detecting microbubble destruction events through a phase insensitive technique such as envelope detection, the events can be detected unambiguously.
The acoustic pulse resulting from a microbubble destruction event can be used adaptively by the diagnostic system to adjust the beamformer timing for aberrations produced by the medium through which the ultrasonic waves travel. Referring to FIG. 3, the transducer array 12 of the probe 10 is shown transmitting an ultrasonic beam into the body of a patient. The profile BP of the ultrasonic beam is indicted by the dashed lines emanating from the transducer array 12. As the ultrasonic wave components emitted by the elements of the array travel through the body of the patient they travel through different layers 92, 94 of skin, muscle, fat, and other types of tissue. Echoes returning from tissue interfaces return to the transducer array through the same layers. While it is conventionally assumed that ultrasonic waves will travel at a predetermined, fixed velocity (e.g., 1540 m/sec.) through tissue, this is not always true in practice; the velocity of the ultrasonic waves can vary slightly depending upon the tissue through which it is traveling. As a result, the time required for a pulse to travel out from a transducer element and back as an echo over the same path can vary from that which is theoretically predicted. Moreover, these times of travel can vary from one transducer element to another along the aperture 13 of the array as different elements along the aperture are opposed by different types of tissue of different thicknesses. As a consequence the time delays of the beamformer, chosen to equalize the times of travel of each signal component but predicated upon a theoretical, constant ultrasonic velocity, will be slightly incorrect. This will cause the combined output signal from the different channels to be slightly out of focus by reason of the aberrations in the uniformity of the medium of the tissues of the body.
As indicated above, the aberration problem is compounded in a pulse echo ultrasound system by the fact that the outbound transmitted pulses encounter these aberrations, then the incoming acoustic echoes also encounter aberrations in the acoustic medium. The combination of the two means that the transmitted beam may not be perfectly focused, and the received echo components may also not be perfectly focused. The present inventors have determined that microbubble destruction events are a means for overcoming a major portion of these limitations. In accordance with the principles of the present invention, the event of a microbubble collapse is used as a point source of ultrasonic energy within the medium being imaged, the tissues of the body. Problems of aberration affected transmit focus are obviated by inducing this generation of point source acoustic energy. The acoustic energy emanating from the event of a microbubble destruction travels along the different acoustic paths leading to the different transducer elements of the array aperture 13, encountering different materials in each path. The received event signal components are coupled from the separate elements of the array 12 through separate channels of the transmitter/receiver 14 to separate channels of the beamformer 16. In FIG. 3, the delays of five of the channels of the beamformer are represented by DL1 through DL5, with the length of each representing the length of the delay in time of that particular channel. At the outputs of the delays the individual signals components from the elements of the transducer are combined by a summer 17 to produce a focused, coherent signal for subsequent signal processing.
To produce a perfectly focused signal the signal components from each echo must appear simultaneously at the outputs of all of the delays, with the delays compensating exactly for variations in the time required for each echo component to travel to a transducer element. But if the velocity of ultrasound through the body has varied due to aberration effects, some signal components may appear at the outputs of the delays earlier or later than others. FIG. 4 shows echo signal components 100-104 produced at the outputs of the five delays whose times of travel have been affected by aberration effects. If the delay times exactly compensated for variations in acoustic wave travel from element to element, the five signals would be in alignment with time tn. But the example shows that the acoustic signal component delayed by channel delay DL4 has experienced a lower acoustic velocity than the others and has been delayed beyond time tn. Also it is seen that the acoustic signal component delayed by channel delay DL3 has experienced a higher acoustic velocity than the others and has arrived at the output of delay DL3 prior to time tn. The other three signal components 101, 102, and 104 are all seen to be properly in alignment at time tn.
These delay inaccuracies can be detected and adjusted through induced microbubble destruction events. FIG. 3 shows a blood vessel 80 in which the blood stream has been infused with a coated microbubble contrast agent. The ultrasonic probe 10 images the blood vessel 80 and begins pulsing the blood flow with ultrasonic pulses sufficient to cause rupturing of the shell of a microbubble. The pulses are transmitted in beams defined by the beam profile BP. As the probe pulses the blood flow the ultrasound system continually processes received echoes as discussed above to detect microbubble destruction events. One such event is depicted in the blood vessel 80 as indicated by arrow 82. The rupturing of this microbubble will be an effective point source transmission of acoustic energy from the point in the vessel where the microbubble is located when it ruptures. The rupture of the microbubble will radiate acoustic energy back to the aperture 13 of the transducer array 12, where acoustic signal components of the event will be received by different transducer elements along the aperture at slightly differing times.
The echo components received by the transducer elements following each pulsing of the blood vessel are separately delayed and temporarily stored in an echo storage and compare module 110. The echo components are also combined by a summer 17 to form a coherent echo signal sequence along the direction of the transmitted beam and these echo signals are processed as shown in FIG. 1 for detection of microbubble destruction events. If no event is detected there is no further need for storage of the separate signal components by the module 110, which is readied for storage of echo components from the next pulse sequence.
When a microbubble destruction event 82 is detected the location of the event along the beam direction by the processing system of FIG. 1 is supplied to the echo storage and compare module 110, informing the module of the time tn where the event should be located in time. The module 110 then begins to compare the event signal components 100-104 of the separate delays to see if the signal components are all in alignment at time tn. When the comparison shows that signal component 100 has experienced a greater delay than the others, a command is sent to a delay adjust circuit 112, which adjusts the delay time of delay DL4 to a slightly shorter delay time to bring components processed by that channel back into coincidence with the others. Similarly when the comparison shows that a signal component 103 needs a greater delay to bring it into coincidence with the others at time tn, a command is sent to the delay adjust circuit 112 which causes a compensating increase in the delay time of delay DL3. With the delays so adjusted for optimal focus, a sharper image will be acquired from the image field.
These adjustments in the delay timing for signal reception are equally applicable to the transmission timing. Effects in the image field which vary the velocity of ultrasonic echoes traveling back to the transducer will equally affect outbound waves transmitted by the transducer. Hence the timing adjustments made to the third and fourth receive channels will also be made to correspondingly advance or retard the timing of transmit pulse production on these channels, enabling focused insonification of all transmitted pulse components in the transmit focal region.
It will be appreciated that the tissue materials which are the source of the aberration inaccuracies will change whenever the position of the probe 10 is changed, causing the acoustic signal components to pass through different layers and combinations of tissues and substances. Accordingly the sequence of event detection, timing comparison and delay adjustment is continuously performed on a periodic basis, continually trimming the delays for optimal focus at each probe position. Aberration correction will thus be effective for so long as the coated microbubbles of the contrast agent are present in the image field.
Powers, Jeffry E., Johnson, Keith W.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10222461, | May 31 2001 | SHENZHEN MINDRAY BIO-MEDICAL ELECTRONICS CO , LTD | Phase inversion ultrasonic imaging |
10258314, | May 03 2013 | SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE | Systems and methods for super-resolution ultrasound imaging |
11357477, | Sep 07 2018 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Microbubble destruction for medical ultrasound imaging |
5577505, | Feb 06 1996 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N V | Means for increasing sensitivity in non-linear ultrasound imaging systems |
5590658, | Jun 29 1995 | TeraTech Corporation | Portable ultrasound imaging system |
5601086, | May 12 1995 | NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION NASA , THE | Beat frequency ultrasonic microsphere contrast agent detection system |
5678553, | Nov 01 1994 | Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH | Ultrasonic processes and circuits for carrying out those processes |
5690114, | Jun 29 1995 | TeraTech Corporation | Portable ultrasound imaging system |
5706819, | Oct 09 1996 | ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES LABORATORIES, INC | Ultrasonic diagnostic imaging with harmonic contrast agents |
5833613, | Sep 27 1996 | Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc.; ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES LABORATORIES, INC | Ultrasonic diagnostic imaging with contrast agents |
5833614, | Jul 15 1997 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Ultrasonic imaging method and apparatus for generating pulse width modulated waveforms with reduced harmonic response |
5833615, | May 09 1997 | Thomas Jefferson University | Excitation enhanced ultrasound system |
5846202, | Jul 30 1996 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Ultrasound method and system for imaging |
5848968, | Jun 19 1996 | GE Yokogawa Medical Systems, Limited | Ultrasonic imaging method and apparatus |
5860931, | Oct 10 1997 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Ultrasound method and system for measuring perfusion |
5873830, | Aug 22 1997 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Ultrasound imaging system and method for improving resolution and operation |
5882306, | Apr 11 1997 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Ultrasound imaging methods and systems |
5897500, | Dec 18 1997 | WEBXCHANGE, INC | Ultrasonic imaging system and method for displaying composite fundamental and harmonic images |
5913823, | Jul 15 1997 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Ultrasound imaging method and system for transmit signal generation for an ultrasonic imaging system capable of harmonic imaging |
5924991, | Aug 22 1997 | Acuson Corporation | Ultrasonic system and method for harmonic imaging in three dimensions |
5928151, | Aug 22 1997 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Ultrasonic system and method for harmonic imaging in three dimensions |
5933389, | Mar 02 1995 | Acuson Corporation | Ultrasonic imaging system and method |
5935069, | Oct 10 1997 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Ultrasound system and method for variable transmission of ultrasonic signals |
5944666, | Aug 21 1997 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Ultrasonic method for imaging blood flow including disruption or activation of contrast agent |
5947904, | Aug 21 1997 | Acuson Corporation | Ultrasonic method and system for imaging blood flow including disruption or activation of a contrast agent |
5951478, | Oct 10 1995 | Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc. | Two pulse technique for ultrasonic harmonic imaging |
5957845, | Apr 11 1997 | Acuson Corporation | Gated ultrasound imaging apparatus and method |
5957846, | Nov 17 1997 | TeraTech Corporation | Portable ultrasound imaging system |
5957852, | Jun 02 1998 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Ultrasonic harmonic imaging system and method |
5961460, | Apr 11 1997 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Ultrasound imaging enhancement methods and systems |
5961464, | Sep 16 1998 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N V | Ultrasound contrast agent detection using spectral analysis from acoustic scan lines |
5964709, | Jun 29 1995 | TeraTech Corporation | Portable ultrasound imaging system |
5971928, | Nov 02 1998 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Diagnostic medical ultrasonic system and method for image subtraction |
5976088, | Jun 24 1998 | Ecton, Inc. | Ultrasound imaging systems and methods of increasing the effective acquisition frame rate |
5980459, | Mar 31 1998 | General Electric Company | Ultrasound imaging using coded excitation on transmit and selective filtering of fundamental and (sub)harmonic signals on receive |
6004270, | Jun 24 1998 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Ultrasound system for contrast agent imaging and quantification in echocardiography using template image for image alignment |
6005827, | Mar 02 1995 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Ultrasonic harmonic imaging system and method |
6009046, | Mar 02 1995 | Acuson Corporation | Ultrasonic harmonic imaging system and method |
6014473, | Feb 29 1996 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Multiple ultrasound image registration system, method and transducer |
6023977, | Aug 01 1997 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Ultrasonic imaging aberration correction system and method |
6027448, | Mar 02 1995 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Ultrasonic transducer and method for harmonic imaging |
6030344, | Dec 04 1996 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Methods and apparatus for ultrasound image quantification |
6039690, | Aug 01 1997 | Acuson Corporation | Method and apparatus for frequency control of an ultrasound system |
6045505, | Aug 01 1997 | Acuson Corporation | Method and apparatus for frequency control of an ultrasound system |
6048316, | Oct 16 1998 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Medical diagnostic ultrasonic imaging system and method for displaying composite fundamental and harmonic images |
6050944, | Jun 17 1997 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Method and apparatus for frequency control of an ultrasound system |
6056691, | Jun 24 1998 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | System for collecting ultrasound imaging data at an adjustable collection image frame rate |
6074348, | Mar 31 1998 | General Electric Company | Method and apparatus for enhanced flow imaging in B-mode ultrasound |
6083168, | Aug 22 1997 | Acuson Corporation | Ultrasound imaging system and method for improving resolution and operation |
6086537, | Jun 24 1998 | Ecton, Inc. | System for reducing speckle in full motion ultrasound image data by filtering across physiologic cycles |
6102865, | Feb 29 1996 | Acuson Corporation | Multiple ultrasound image registration system, method and transducer |
6104670, | Mar 02 1995 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Ultrasonic harmonic imaging system and method |
6106465, | Aug 22 1997 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Ultrasonic method and system for boundary detection of an object of interest in an ultrasound image |
6106472, | Nov 17 1997 | TeraTech Corporation | Portable ultrasound imaging system |
6110120, | Apr 11 1997 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Gated ultrasound imaging apparatus and method |
6122222, | Mar 02 1995 | Acuson Corporation | Ultrasonic transmit and receive system |
6131458, | Aug 01 1997 | Acuson Corporation | Ultrasonic imaging aberration correction system and method |
6132374, | Aug 01 1997 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Ultrasonic imaging method and system |
6132376, | Feb 29 1996 | Acuson Corporation | Multiple ultrasonic image registration system, method and transducer |
6132377, | Mar 31 1999 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Medical diagnostic ultrasonic imaging system and method using differential sub-band detection techniques |
6168565, | Mar 31 1999 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Medical diagnostic ultrasound system and method for simultaneous phase correction of two frequency band signal components |
6171245, | Mar 12 1998 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Method of imaging scatterers based on acoustically stimulated changes of their acoustic properties |
6174286, | Nov 25 1998 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Medical diagnostic ultrasound method and system for element switching |
6186949, | Mar 31 1998 | General Electric Company | Method and apparatus for three-dimensional flow imaging using coded excitation |
6190322, | Jun 29 1999 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N V | Ultrasonic imaging system and method using linear cancellation |
6193659, | Jul 15 1997 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Medical ultrasonic diagnostic imaging method and apparatus |
6201900, | Feb 29 1996 | Acuson Corporation | Multiple ultrasound image registration system, method and transducer |
6206833, | Nov 08 1996 | Research Corporation Technologiers, Inc. | Finite amplitude distortion-based inhomogeneous pulse echo ultrasonic imaging |
6210333, | Oct 12 1999 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Medical diagnostic ultrasound system and method for automated triggered intervals |
6210334, | Mar 31 1999 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Medical diagnostic ultrasound method and apparatus for harmonic detection using doppler processing |
6213946, | Dec 24 1998 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N V | Methods and apparatus for speckle reduction by orthogonal pulse compounding in medical ultrasound imaging |
6213951, | Feb 19 1999 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Medical diagnostic ultrasound method and system for contrast specific frequency imaging |
6221018, | Jul 15 1997 | Acuson Corporation | Medical ultrasonic diagnostic imaging method and apparatus |
6222795, | Mar 02 1995 | Acuson Corporation | Ultrasonic harmonic imaging system and method |
6222948, | Feb 29 1996 | Acuson Corporation | Multiple ultrasound image registration system, method and transducer |
6223599, | Aug 01 1997 | Acuson Corporation | Ultrasonic imaging aberration correction system and method |
6224556, | Nov 25 1998 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Diagnostic medical ultrasound system and method for using a sparse array |
6224557, | Feb 03 2000 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N V | Ultrasonic method using adaptive clutter filter to remove tissue wall motion |
6226228, | Mar 02 1995 | Acuson Corporation | Ultrasonic harmonic imaging system and method |
6228030, | Jun 24 1998 | Ecton, Inc. | Method of using ultrasound energy to locate the occurrence of predetermined event in the heart cycle or other physiologic cycle of the body |
6234967, | Dec 18 1998 | ATL Ultrasound | Ultrasonic diagnostic imaging systems with power modulation for contrast and harmonic imaging |
6245019, | May 11 1998 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus |
6306095, | Apr 11 1997 | Acuson Corporation | Gated ultrasound imaging apparatus and method |
6312379, | Aug 15 1997 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Ultrasonic harmonic imaging system and method using waveform pre-distortion |
6312381, | Sep 14 1999 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Medical diagnostic ultrasound system and method |
6315730, | Apr 24 1997 | GE HEALTHCARE AS | Ultrasound imaging of tissue perfusion by pulse energy disruption of contrast agent |
6322512, | Jan 22 1997 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Ultrasound contrast imaging |
6340348, | Jul 02 1999 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Contrast agent imaging with destruction pulses in diagnostic medical ultrasound |
6354997, | Jun 17 1997 | Acuson Corporation | Method and apparatus for frequency control of an ultrasound system |
6360027, | Feb 29 1996 | Acuson Corporation | Multiple ultrasound image registration system, method and transducer |
6398735, | Mar 07 2000 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N V | Detecting a relative level of an ultrasound imaging contrast agent |
6401539, | Aug 01 1997 | Acuson Corporation | Ultrasonic imaging aberration correction system and method |
6436039, | Sep 14 1999 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Medicial diagnostic ultrasound system and method |
6464643, | Oct 06 2000 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N V | Contrast imaging with motion correction |
6468213, | Sep 14 1999 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Medical diagnostic ultrasound system and method |
6488625, | Sep 14 1999 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Medical diagnostic ultrasound system and method |
6497664, | Sep 14 1999 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Medical diagnostic ultrasound system and method |
6497666, | Oct 25 2000 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Medical ultrasonic contrast agent imaging method and apparatus |
6508763, | Sep 14 1999 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Medical diagnostic ultrasound system and method |
6524244, | Sep 14 1999 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Medical diagnostic ultrasound system and method |
6527718, | Aug 20 1999 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N V | Ultrasound system for continuous imaging and delivery of an encapsulated agent |
6537222, | Aug 26 1997 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N V | Methods for the detection of contrast agents in ultrasonic imaging |
6540684, | Oct 10 1995 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Ultrasonic perfusion measurement using contrast agents |
6544184, | Aug 28 2001 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Imaging with reduced artifacts for medical diagnostic ultrasound |
6547738, | May 03 2001 | GE Medical Systems Global Technology Company, LLC | Methods and apparatus for using ultrasound with contrast agent |
6561979, | Sep 14 1999 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Medical diagnostic ultrasound system and method |
6575910, | Oct 10 1995 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Ultrasonic image persistence using contrast agents |
6626831, | Apr 11 1997 | Acuson Corporation | Gated ultrasound imaging apparatus and method |
6645147, | Nov 25 1998 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Diagnostic medical ultrasound image and system for contrast agent imaging |
6652463, | Jul 14 2000 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | System and method for non-linear detection of ultrasonic contrast agents at a fundamental frequency |
6673019, | Jan 31 2000 | Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation | Diagnostic ultrasound imaging based on rate subtraction imaging (RSI) |
6726629, | Jan 16 1998 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Ultrasound contrast imaging |
6740039, | Aug 20 1999 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N V | Methods and apparatus for displaying information relating to delivery and activation of a therapeutic agent using ultrasound energy |
6796944, | May 17 2002 | GE Medical Systems Global Technology, LLC | Display for subtraction imaging techniques |
6905467, | Aug 15 1997 | Acuson Corporation | Ultrasonic harmonic imaging system and method using waveform pre-distortion |
6951542, | Jun 26 2002 | Esaote S.p.A. | Method and apparatus for ultrasound imaging of a biopsy needle or the like during an ultrasound imaging examination |
7004905, | Nov 08 1996 | Research Corporation Technologies, Inc. | Finite amplitude distortion-based inhomogeneous pulse echo ultrasonic imaging |
7104956, | Nov 08 1996 | RESEARCH CORPORATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Finite amplitude distortion-based inhomogeneous pulse echo ultrasonic imaging |
7500952, | Jun 29 1995 | TeraTech Corporation | Portable ultrasound imaging system |
7513870, | Nov 08 1996 | Research Corproation Technologies, Inc. | Finite amplitude distortion-based inhomogeneous pulse echo ultrasonic imaging |
7527591, | Nov 21 2003 | General Electric Company | Ultrasound probe distributed beamformer |
7527592, | Nov 21 2003 | GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS GLOBAL | Ultrasound probe sub-aperture processing |
7678048, | Sep 14 1999 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Medical diagnostic ultrasound system and method |
7699781, | May 31 2001 | SHENZHEN MINDRAY BIO-MEDICAL ELECTRONICS CO , LTD | System for phase inversion ultrasonic imaging |
7753850, | Nov 07 2003 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N V | Method for ultrasound perfusion imaging |
7811233, | Nov 08 1996 | Research Corporation Technologies, Inc. | Finite amplitude distortion-based inhomogeneous pulse echo ultrasonic imaging |
7828731, | Sep 06 2001 | FUJIFILM Healthcare Corporation | Ultrasonographic apparatus, ultrasonographic data processing method, and ultrasonographic data processing program |
8043219, | Sep 17 2004 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.; Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Automated power level for contrast agent imaging |
8226561, | Aug 20 1999 | SHENZHEN MINDRAY BIO-MEDICAL ELECTRONICS CO , LTD | Ultrasound imaging system |
8241217, | Jun 29 1995 | TeraTech Corporation | Portable ultrasound imaging data |
8469893, | Jun 29 1995 | Teratech Corp. | Portable ultrasound imaging system |
8628474, | Jun 29 1995 | TeraTech Corporation | Portable ultrasound imaging system |
8679018, | Aug 20 1999 | SHENZHEN MINDRAY BIO-MEDICAL ELECTRONICS CO , LTD | Broad-beam imaging |
8764661, | Aug 20 1999 | SHENZHEN MINDRAY BIO-MEDICAL ELECTRONICS CO , LTD | Echolocation data generation |
9022939, | Mar 11 2005 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Microbubble generating technique for phase aberration correction |
9566042, | Jun 29 2001 | Esaote, S.p.A. | Method for ultrasound imaging of a biopsy needle or the like during an ultrasound imaging examination |
D445189, | Sep 14 1999 | Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc | Medical diagnostic ultrasound system |
D454954, | Sep 14 1999 | Ecton, Inc. | Medical diagnostic ultrasound system |
RE43048, | Oct 10 1995 | Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc. | Ultrasonic diagnostic imaging with harmonic contrast agents |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5040537, | Nov 24 1987 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Method and apparatus for the measurement and medical treatment using an ultrasonic wave |
5135000, | Sep 19 1990 | Raizot University Authority for Applied Research & Industrial | Method of measuring regional tissue blood flow |
5255683, | Dec 30 1991 | University of Pittsburgh - Of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education | Methods of and systems for examining tissue perfusion using ultrasonic contrast agents |
5302372, | Jul 27 1992 | National Science Council | Method to opacify left ventricle in echocardiography |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Nov 23 1994 | Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Nov 23 1994 | JOHNSON, KEITH W | ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES LABORATORIES, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 007242 | /0833 | |
Nov 23 1994 | POWERS, JEFFRY E | ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES LABORATORIES, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 007242 | /0833 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
May 04 1999 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Aug 04 1999 | M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Aug 04 1999 | M186: Surcharge for Late Payment, Large Entity. |
Mar 21 2003 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Mar 27 2007 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 10 1998 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 10 1999 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 10 1999 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 10 2001 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 10 2002 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 10 2003 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 10 2003 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 10 2005 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 10 2006 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 10 2007 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 10 2007 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 10 2009 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |