A computerized system for the continuous manufactured of individual elements, notably glass containers, is disclosed. A pulse sensor which emits one pulse per cycle is connected to an asynchronous motor with a frequency variator. A cpu is programmed with a synchronism equation that orders the increase or reduction of frequency of each variator according to the pulses received by the cpu programmed with the synchronism equation.

Patent
   5485388
Priority
Feb 23 1994
Filed
Feb 23 1994
Issued
Jan 16 1996
Expiry
Feb 23 2014
Assg.orig
Entity
Small
0
10
EXPIRED
1. A computerized rotary drive system for the synchronized movement of individual elements comprising:
a) a series of unit blocks constituted by a mechanical device (Ti), driven by asynchronous motors (Mi) that carry out a cyclic stage (Fi) for each of them;
b) at least one sensor (15i) in each stage (Fi), each said sensor emitting one pulse per cycle, and sending a signal to a cpu (2') programmed with the synchronism equation
CtsEFi -CtsEFj =CtiEFi -CtiEFj =Dtsij :
wherein:
ti=any instant
ts=instant of synchronism
CtsEFi and CtiEFi =cumulative quantity of individual elements conveyed in stage Fi at instant ts and at instant ti respectively
CtsEFj and CtiEFj =cumulative quantity of individual elements conveyed in stage Fj at instant ts and at instant ti respectively
Dtsij =difference in individual elements conveyed between stages Fi and Fj at instant ts said cpu calculating the real difference Dtiij in individual elements conveyed between any two stages (Fi) (Fj) at any instant (ti) and by comparison with the difference Dtsij calculating a frequency variation (fi) that orders the frequency variator (Vi) to act on the corresponding asynchronous motor (Mi) and modify its operation to attain the result that the real difference (Dtiij) and synchronism difference (Dtsij) will tend to equality.
2. The computerized rotary drive system for the synchronized movement of individual elements according to claim 1, wherein the instant of synchronism (ts) is decided by the cpu (2') when the discrete differences of the derivatives of the synchronism equation coincide for every two stages (Fi) (Fj).
3. The computerized rotary drive system for the synchronized movement of individual elements according to claim 2, wherein a preestablished outside element of the unit block of a stage (Fi) is the master of comparison for all the rest.
4. The computerized rotary drive system for the synchronized movement of individual elements according to claim 2, wherein the synchronism difference value Dtsij is preestablished.
5. The computerized rotary drive system for the synchronized movement of individual elements according to claim 1, wherein the sensor (15i) is placed at the end of each mechanical device (Ti).
6. The computerized rotary drive system for the synchronized movement of individual elements according to claim 1 wherein said individual elements are glass containers.
7. The computerized rotary drive system for the synchronized movement of individual elements according to claim 2 wherein said individual elements are glass containers.
8. The computerized rotary drive system for the synchronized movement of individual elements according to claim 3 wherein said individual elements are glass containers.
9. The computerized rotary drive system for the synchronized movement of individual elements according to claim 4 wherein said individual elements are glass containers.
10. The computerized rotary drive system for the synchronized movement of individual elements according to claim 5 wherein said individual elements are glass containers.

In the continuous manufacture of individual elements, the problem of synchronization of the devices for feed, conveyance, treatment, etc. of said elements arises, for example, in the production of glass containers.

It has been attempted to solve the problem through the use of synchronous motors with a frequency synthesis from a standard, but this solution is very expensive and demands very precise and complex adjustment, without the necessary accuracy ever being achieved, because of the impossibility of synthesizing the different relations of the periodic fractions of the frequencies.

The applicant has found an inexpensive and simple solution to the complex problem mentioned.

The applicant uses in each stage of manufacture a pulse sensor or detector, which emits one pulse per cycle, an asynchronous motor with a frequency variator and a CPU programmed with a synchronism equation that orders the increase/reduction of frequency of each variator, that is, of the rate of circulation in each stage, by virtue of the pulses received and of the program mentioned.

FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of a part of a glass bottle production installation in which the system which is the subject of the invention is applied.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the system which is the subject of the invention applied to the installation of FIG. 1.

The system can be developed for a complete installation, but a part of same has been represented to simplify its explanation.

In glass bottle production installations, all the chemical components that are going to form part of the glass are mixed. In a second stage the chemical components are homogenized.

Both stages can be controlled by the system, which is the subject of the invention, but they have not been represented on the figures for sake of simplification.

The homogenized mixture is melted in a furnace that has several outlets (20), in the bottom (24) of which appears the molten glass, cut at its outlet (stage or function) F1 into drops (pieces) by a cutting device (28), which will give rise to the bottles.

The drops mentioned are sent by means of a distributor (21) (stage F2) to molds (22) that are sequenced to receive the corresponding drop by a drum (23) (stage F3).

Once the bottles are shaped, an extractor (stage F4) moves them from the molds (22) to the machine conveyor belt (25) that moves them (stage F5) to a transfer wheel (26) (stage F6) which transfers them from the first conveyor belt (25) to a box conveyor belt (27) placed perpendicular to that of the machine (stage F7).

The bottles will then pass, by means of a box pusher (not represented), from the box conveyor belt (27) to an annealing box (not represented).

On FIG. 2 some asynchronous motors (M1), (M2), (M3), (M4) . . . have been schematically represented; by means of reducers (R1), (R2), (R3), (R4) . . . , they drive mechanical devices (T1), (T2), (T3), (T4) . . . which operate the function stages (F1), (F2), (F3), (F4) . . . that have been previously explained.

All of the stages (F1), (F2), F3), (F4) are cyclic, as the concatenated movements of the asynchronous motor (M), reducer (R) and mechanical device (T).

The cycle will preferably be considered repetition of the movement at the outlet or end (O1), (O2), (O3), (O4) . . . of the mechanical drive device, with which a fixed number of bottles per cycle has been previously associated, with the cutting device (T1 =28) two bottles per cycle, with the transfer wheel (26=T6) eight bottles per cycle, etc.

All of these relations, like the mechanical and cyclic relations between the elements of the same stage, are introduced in a CPU (2') that controls the installation and the process.

The chain of stages (F1), (F2), (F3), (F4) . . . is rigid, in the sense that the flow of bottles cannot be compressed, as if it were a liquid, since on its path there is no appearance/disappearance of bottles. In operation, the quantity of bottles delivered in one stage (Fi) has to be equal to the quantity of bottles delivered by the following stage (Fi+1).

At the outlet (O) or final point of the corresponding mechanical device (T) there is a single sensor (151), (152), (153), (154) . . . that emits one pulse per cycle, sending its signal to the CPU (2'), which calculates the number of bottles (Ni) corresponding to that concrete cycle and adds it to the cumulative quantity of bottles corresponding to that phase (Fi) (cumulative flow) (CFiEFi).

Generalizing, it can be stated that starting from an instant of synchronism, the following equation must be executed in order to maintain same

CtsEFi -CtsEFj =CtiEFi -CtiEfj =Dtsij (1)

or what is the same thing:

In the above equation, the symbols are defined as follows:

ti=any instant

ts=instant of synchronism

CtsEFi and CtiEFi =cumulative quantity of bottles conveyed in stage Fi at instant ts and at instant ti respectively

CtsEFj and CtiEFj =cumulative quantity of bottles conveyed in stage Fj at instant is and at instant ti respectively

Dtsij =difference in bottles conveyed between stages Fi and Fj at instant ts.

At any instant (ti) the cumulative quantity (CtiEFi) of bottles conveyed by one stage (Fi) and the cumulative quantity (CtiEFj) of bottles conveyed by any other stage (Fj) must differ by the same quantity (Dtsij) as they would differ at the instant of synchronism (ts), since at

CEFi CEFj that moment (ts) there are CtsEFi, CtsEFj bottles in stages Fi, Fj respectively, with the results that:

CtiEFi =ΣNi×No. cycles+CtsEFi(2)

Ni being the quantity of bottles conveyed per cycle of stage Fl.

The instant ts of synchronism is determined manually or automatically; for example, the CPU (2'), at the start of operation of the system or after an interruption, decides synchronism when the derivatives of the equation (1) (in practice, their discrete differences ) coincide for each stage (F). At the instant (ts) known or decided by the CPU (2'), the CPU itself calculates the difference datum Dtsij which, with its clock for the calculation of times and the constants already mentioned, receives the pulses from the corresponding sensors (151), (152), (153), (154) . . . and calculates the real differences Dtiij at instant (ti) and calculates the differential between the difference Dtsij necessary to maintain synchronic operation and the real difference Dtiij.

Once the calculation is made and within certain preestablished thresholds, it calculates the variation of frequency (fi) necessary for each asynchronous motor (M1), by accelerating/decelerating, to place its stage Fi in synchronism or, what is the same thing, for

Dtiij Dtsij

the real difference tends to the theoretical or initial difference.

Once the variation of frequency (fi) is calculated, it orders the corresponding frequency variator (V1), (V2), (V3), (V4) . . . to vary the frequency (fi) of the corresponding asynchronous motor (M1, (M2), (M3), (M4) . . . in the direction indicated, ie acceleration or deceleration.

The operator or the programmed CPU (2') can decide on the value of the theoretical difference Dtsij with which, when the installation is restarted, synchronism is decided, once the real difference in stages (Fi) (Fj) attains the value of difference Dtsij.

It is preestablished that an outside element or outlet (Oi) of one of the mechanical devices (Ti) is the master, so that said outlet (Oi) or its corresponding phase (Fi) is that of comparison for all the rest.

It is to be understood that the term bottle can be substituted by the term element, for the subject of the invention can also be applied to other types of installations.

Dutto, Ivo, Arechaga, Alfonso

Patent Priority Assignee Title
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4203752, Oct 18 1977 Hermann Heye KG Multi-station glass-forming machine
4247317, Apr 20 1978 BALL PACKAGING PRODUCTS, INC , A CORP OF IN Glassware forming machine computer-ram controller system
4313750, Sep 12 1980 CSS International Corporation Electronically controlled robot for handling glassware
4409013, Oct 27 1980 Vitro Tec Fideicomiso 90 Degree push-out for glassware forming machines and electronic control for the same
4457772, Jul 08 1981 BALL PACKAGING PRODUCTS, INC , A CORP OF IN Management control system for forming glassware
4547211, Apr 20 1978 BALL PACKAGING PRODUCTS, INC , A CORP OF IN Control of a glassware forming machine
4615723, May 19 1983 IP TECNOLOGIA VIDRIERA, LTD ; CENTRO DE TECNOLOGIA VIDRIERA, LTD ; VITRO EUROPA, LTD Intelligent controller for predicting and automatically compensating for variations in cycle time, in machines for forming articles of glass or other materials
4636238, Oct 27 1984 EMHART GLASS S A Control of apparatus for use in the manufacture of glassware articles
4708727, Nov 14 1986 IP TECNOLOGIA VIDRIERA, LTD ; CENTRO DE TECNOLOGIA VIDRIERA, LTD ; VITRO EUROPA, LTD Method and apparatus for synchronizing the velocity of a 90 degree push-out apparatus and of the carrier converyor in an I.S. glassware forming machine
4876652, Jul 21 1987 GLASS MACHINERY INC A CORPORATION OF DE Apparatus and method for controlling the shear mechanism of a glassware forming machine
//////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Feb 02 1994FANTINI, IVO D VIDRALA, S A ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0068900853 pdf
Feb 02 1994CAMARA, ALFONSO A VIDRALA, S A ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0068900853 pdf
Feb 02 1994FANTINI, IVO D AVACON, S A ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0068900853 pdf
Feb 02 1994CAMARA, ALFONSO A AVACON, S A ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0068900853 pdf
Feb 23 1994Vidrala S.A.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Feb 23 1994Avacon, S.A.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Date Maintenance Fee Events
May 11 1999M283: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity.
May 18 1999ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Aug 06 2003REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Jan 16 2004EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Jan 16 19994 years fee payment window open
Jul 16 19996 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jan 16 2000patent expiry (for year 4)
Jan 16 20022 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Jan 16 20038 years fee payment window open
Jul 16 20036 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jan 16 2004patent expiry (for year 8)
Jan 16 20062 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Jan 16 200712 years fee payment window open
Jul 16 20076 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jan 16 2008patent expiry (for year 12)
Jan 16 20102 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)