A method of and an arrangement for preventing accidents during operation of a manually-operated machine tool having a rotatable toolbit and a drive motor for driving the toolbit, wherein an operational condition of the toolbit is determined with a rotational motion sensor, a time constant is selected, a maximum forecast rotational angle at an end of a time period determined by the selected time constant is calculated on a basis of a rotational motion signal generated by the sensor, and transmission of drive motion from the drive motor to the rotatable toolbit is interrupted as soon as the calculated, forecasted rotational angle exceeds a value of the maximum allowable rotational angle.
|
1. A method of preventing accidents during operation of a manually-operated machine tool having a rotatable toolbit and a drive motor for driving the toolbit, said method comprising steps of:
determining an operational condition of the toolbit with a rotational motion sensor; selecting a time constant; calculating, on a basis of a rotational motion signal generated by the sensor, a maximum forecast rotational angle at an end of a time period determined by the selected time constant; and interrupting transmission of drive motion from the drive motor to the rotatable toolbit as soon as the calculated, forecasted rotational angle exceeds a value of maximum allowable rotational angle.
14. An arrangement for preventing accidents during operation of a manually-operated machine tool having a rotatable toolbit and a drive motor for driving the toolbit, said arrangement comprising:
means for interrupting transmission of drive motion from the drive motor to the toolbit; a rotational motion sensor for determining an operational condition of the toolbit; computer means for calculating, on a basis of a rotational motion signal generated by the sensor, a maximum forecast rotational angle at an end of a time period determined by a selected time constant; and an output interface for transmitting to the interrupting means an actuation signal generated by the computer means when the calculated, forecasted rotational angle exceeds a pre-determined maximum allowable rotational angle.
2. A method according to
3. A method according to
4. A method according to
5. A method according to
6. A method according to
7. A method according to
8. A method according to
9. A method according to
10. A method according to
11. A method according to
12. A method according to
13. A method according to
15. An arrangement according to
17. An arrangement according to
18. An arrangement according to
19. An arrangement according to
20. An arrangement according to
|
The invention relates to a method of and an apparatus for preventing accidents during operation of manually-operated machine tools with a rotatable toolbit, in particular, hammer drills, by interrupting the transmission of motion from a drive motor of the machine tool to the toolbit, dependent on the operational condition of the toolbit which is sensed by a rotational motion sensor.
During an operation of manually-operated machine tools, particularly such powerful machine tools as drill hammers, the accidents which may be caused by the rotating toolbit, such as an injury of a hand or damage to a ladder, a scaffold and the like, are prevented by rapid blocking of the toolbit. However, rapid increase of the reaction torque of the machine tool presents a serious problem. Of a plurality of prior art publications directed to the solution of this problem, two publications can be named as examples, EP-A-0150 669 and WO-DE 88-00109.
The first publication, EP-A-0150 669, discloses providing, in the machine tool housing, of a closed small container containing an electrically conductive liquid mass, specifically mercury, which is interspersed by a magnetic field of a permanent magnet.
Upon a more or less jerky rotation of the housing about the spindle axis, as a result of an action of the reaction torque, a relative movement takes place between the conductive liquid and the container or the permanent magnet which is fixed in the container and which induces voltage in the conductive mass. This voltage which appears, for example, when a predetermined threshold value is exceeded, is sensed and is used for releasing a coupling which connects the drive motor with the toolbit, and the release of which interrupts the transmission of the drive motion from the electric motor to the toolbit.
The second publication, WO-DE-88 0-0109, discloses a device operable on a similar principle, namely, the use of rotational motion sensors which are fixed in or on the housing and which sense a magnitude of a rotational path, and/or an angular speed, and/or an angular acceleration of a pivotal movement of the manually-operated machine tool.
Dependent on a predetermined criterium, the sensor signal actuates a respective coupling or clutch which interrupts the transmission of the drive motion from the electric motor to the toolbit. As a rotational motion sensor, according to this publication, a spring-loaded mechanical inertial switch is used which acts directly on the clutch.
The drawbacks of the solutions, which are disclosed in the above-discussed two publications, consist in that during the operation of the machine tool, for example, in this case a drill hammer, in a cement mass, the unhomogeneous composition may trigger a false actuation of the safety coupling. These, as well as all of the other known solutions, are based on a passive evaluation of the accident signal, in particular, when the motion sensor and the actuator are part of a single unit and when a pure mechanical or electromechanical principle is used for preventing accidents.
Accordingly, an object of the invention is providing in a manually-operated machine tool with a rotatable toolbit means for preventing accidents, which is based on a better difference criterium between allowable and dangerous reaction moments that could result in an accident.
Another object of the invention is providing means which would enable an early actuation of safety or interrupting means, so that the safety of the operation with the machine tool with a rotatable toolbit is substantially increased.
These and other objects of the invention, which will become apparent hereinafter, are achieved by providing a method of preventing accidents during operation of a manually-operated machine tool having a rotatable toolbit and a drive motor for driving the toolbit, which includes the step of determining an operational condition of the tool with a rotational motion sensor, selecting a time constant, calculating, on a basis of a rotational motion signal generated by the sensor, a maximum forecast rotational angle at an end of a time period determined by the selected time constant, and interrupting transmission of drive motion from the drive motor to the rotatable toolbit as soon as the calculated, forecasted rotational angle exceeds a value of the maximum allowable rotational angle.
Thus, the invention is based on an idea of an advanced forecast of a future behavior of the machine tool so that appropriate counter measures can be undertaken before the machine tool attains a too large rotational pulse, when an accident can no longer be prevented.
According to the invention, as a rotational motion sensor, an angular acceleration sensor such as a micromechanical acceleration meter with a very short response time, is used. When the sensor-generated measurement signal exceeds a predetermined reference value, it is converted by double integration over a time period, determined by a time constant, into a forecast or expected rotational angle. The double integration is advantageously effected with limiting the used band width.
To reduce the influence of low and/or high frequency disturbances which are always present, the used band width has a lower limiting frequency of 0.5-10 Hz and an upper limiting frequency of 100-1000 Hz.
As interrupting means according to the invention, an electromagnetic friction coupling is used. However, a multiple-disc coupling as well as a claw coupling can be used for interrupting the transmission of the drive motion from the electric motor to the rotating toolbit. By diverse measures, by research and by practical experience, it was determined that for a desired interruption, dependent on the type of machine tool used, the decoupling time lies within the range of 5-20 milliseconds. The decoupling can, and as a rule, is connected with a simultaneouls cut-off of a current flow to the electrical motor.
For small machine tools with relatively light rotors, instead of a coupling, a quick-action brake can be used, again, in connection with simultaneous current cut-off. The safety means is generally actuated when a forecast rotational angle calculated on a basis of a rotational motion signal sensed by the sensor, exceeds a predetermined maximum allowable rotational angle, for example, 40°-75°, from a momentary actual angle of the toolbit.
An arrangement for preventing accidents during operation of a manually-operated machine tool having a rotatable toolbit and a drive motor for driving the toolbit, includes means for interrupting transmission of the drive motion from the drive motor to the toolbit, a rotational motion sensor for determining an operational condition of the toolbit, computer means for calculating, on a basis of a rotational motion signal generated by the sensor, a maximum forecast rotational angle at an end of a time period determined by a selected time constant, and an output interface for transmitting to the interrupting means an actuation signal generated by the computer means when the calculated, forecasted rotational angle exceeds a pre-determined maximum allowable rotational angle.
The calculation means, e.g., computer means, preferably includes band width limiting filter means with above-indicated limiting frequencies. As a rotational motion sensor or sensors, angular acceleration sensors, in particular a micromechanical acceleration meter, angular speed sensors, or torque sensors, can be used. According to the present knowledge, angular acceleration meters or sensors with a response time usually of less than one millisecond, is preferred.
The objects and features of the present invention will become more apparent and the invention itself will be best understood, from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment when read with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a basic arrangement according to the present invention for forecasting a need for an action to prevent an accident that may be caused by a rotating toolbit;
FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a hammer drill, taken as an example of a manually-operated machine tool, in which the essential elements of the arrangement of FIG. 1 are shown with marked rectangles;
FIG. 3 is an operational block diagram for effecting an advanced signal evaluation with the use of acceleration meters as sensors;
FIG. 4 is a diagram of a transfer function when band limiting integrators are used in the arrangement of FIG. 3;
FIG. 5 is a source code flow chart for signal evaluation with a microprocessor; and
FIG. 6 is an analog circuit diagram for effecting executive routine, according to the present invention.
An arrangement for an advanced prevention of accidents by an immediate blocking of a rotating toolbit of a manually-operated machine tool, in particular of a hammer drill, and an algorithm and an evaluation circuit therefor, according to the present invention, will now be described in detail with reference to the drawings.
As shown in FIG. 1, an operational condition of a manually-operated machine tool M can be monitored with at least one sensor, such as an angular acceleration sensor 1a, which can be formed by an accelerator meter, angular speed sensor 1b, a path meter (translational sensor) ets., or a torque sensor 1n.
The sensor signals are transmitted through an input interface 2, which can be formed as analog-to-digital convertor, ets., to an electronic evaluation unit which may be formed as a microprocessor, a microcontroller based on a discreet circuit technique, a signal processor or the like, and which includes a pattern-or control-based alogorithm that predicts an operational condition of the machine in response to signals received from a sensor or sensors 1a-1n. A tested example of such a pattern-based alogorithm will be discussed in more detail below.
When a potential accident is detected, the evaluation unit or controller 3 transmits command signals through an output interface 4 to one or more actuators 5a-5n, for example, to a coupling 5a which interrupts the drive path between the drive motor 7 and the tool holder or tool 8, to a circuit breaker 5b and/or brake 5n.
These actuators prevent a predicted or precalculated damage event from occurring, in particular a damage event which may be caused by the rotating toolbit. As soon as the machine tool is transferred into a condition which is safe for the machine tool operator, it can again be actuated by the operator.
In the example of an arrangement shown in FIG. 2, a combination of an inertial angular acceleration sensor 1 with an integrated amplifier, a programmed microcontroller 3 with an analog-to-digital converter, a digital interface 2, a digital-to-analog interface 4, a semiconductor circuit breaker 6, and an electromagnetic coupling 5 is used.
A jerky reaction about the axis 9, which occurs in operation by a sudden blocking of the toolbit according to the invention, should be limited in accordance with calculations, to a non-dangerous rotational angle of typically less than 60°. The angular acceleration about the axis 9 is detectable by the angular acceleration sensor 1 whose autodynamics, in view of the problem solved, should be sufficiently rapid with a response time typically less than one millisecond.
The use of such angular acceleration sensors are known for example, in micromechanical devices, and the sensors are usually available on the market. They are usually available in a form of a differential condensator, in which the middle electrode of the condensator is formed as a pendulum mass of a B-meter that can be directly built into the measuring circuit. An amplified signal of the sensor 1 is transmitted, through the analog-to-digital interface 2, to the microcontroller 3 and is processed there according to the evaluation algorithm, which will be discussed in detail further below.
The evaluation algorithm is basically shown in FIG. 3 and serves to predict the behavior of the machine M in response to a signal from the sensor. The input filter 10, formed as a low-pass filter, serves for reducing of high-frequency disturbances. After a double integration with integrators 11 and 12, initialized at suitable points of time, based on the sensor signal, a constant acceleration of an expected rotational angle by actual time t, plus a pre-set or pre-settable time period τ is calculated.
This so-called predictable or Look-Ahead time constant τ should be so selected that, on one hand, sufficient time remains for taking necessary safety measures and, on the other hand, a reliable forecast is made. As soon as the forecasted rotational angle exceeds a predetermined allowable maximum rotational angle, a respective actuator, which is provided with an amplifier, is actuated by microcontroller 3 through the output interface 4, which is provided with a digital-to-analog converter.
The actuator actuates the circuit breaker 6, formed as a high-speed semi-conductor circuit breaker 6, which interrupts the flow of current to the drive motor 7 of the machine M, and on the other hand, turns off the coupling 5, which breaks the drive path between the rotor of the drive motor 7 and the remaining elements of the drive path from the drive motor rotor to the toolbit 8.
Thereby, it is achieved that no additional electrical energy is supplied to the machine tool, on one hand, and on the other hand, it is insured that a kinetic energy, which is already accumulated in the rotor of the drive motor 7, is not used for an undesirable rotation of the toolbit 8.
In the case when angular speed sensors are used, the mathematical basis of the inventive idea, Look-Ahead idea, consists in double integration in the interval t (actual time)--(t+τ). Based on constant simulated acceleration u(t), with the use of actual values of a rotational angle ψ(t) and the angular speed ω(t) as initial parameters. The following equation serves for calculating u(t): ##EQU1##
The acceleration u(t) is measured with angular speed sensor 1 and is compared, for example, with a constant preset acceleration value u(φ). Under these conditions, within the time interval t-(t+τ), the assumption u(t)=u(φ) is valid.
Therefrom follows: ##EQU2##
The more the precalculated estimation ζ(t+τ) approaches the true rotational angle ψ(t+τ), the better the obtained equation comes true for the accelaration u(t). In this regard, it is very important to reduce the influence of low and/or high frequency disturbances which are always present.
In a practically tested embodiment of the invention, in the block diagram of FIG. 3, the integrators 11 and 12 are formed as band-limiting integrators, i.e., at low frequencies the amplification of these elements is limited to a finite value. This is important, because slow hand movements of an operator which are always present during normal operation and which should not result in an emergency turn-off of the machine, should not be transmitted to the integrators 11 and 12.
In addition, the band-limiting integrators 11 and 12 eliminate the switching-off drift, in a case when the acceleration sensor 1 is characterized by a quasi-statical behavior in which a pieso-electrical acceleration sensor is used as sensor 1.
The mathematical description of a band-limiting integrator is usually made by using its transfer function: ##EQU3## where the parameter TI is obtained from the equation ##EQU4## where ωu indicates the frequency which the integrated parameter should attain.
Usually, when a manually-operated drill is used, very large acceleration values are obtained with likewise very high frequencies. In order that these very high values do not lead to an erroneous actuation of the safety arrangement (circuit breaking, coupling release), it is necessary to filter out the signals exceeding an upper cut-off frequency ωo. This band width limitation of the input signal from the sensor 1 is effected with the low-pass filter 10 shown in FIG. 3.
The scaled complex transfer function, which is determined by a logarithm of the rotary frequency ω within a band range used, according to the present invention, is schematically shown in FIG. 4. The band is defined by limits ωu and ωo, which are different according to the invention.
For a manually-operated drill, as an example, the following values are used:
0.5 HZ<ωu <10 HZ
100 HZ <ωo <1000 HZ
The corresponding values for other types of manually-operated machine tools are easily determined by operators in an obvious manner experimentally.
The execution of the signal evaluation according to the diagram of FIG. 3 can be effected with a microprocessor equipped with appropriate software (see FIG. 5) or by using an analog electronic circuit (see FIG. 6).
FIG. 5 shows a flow chart of a time-controlled interrupt-service routine for calculation of a discreet system equation, which is given in block 20 (Field 1) of the inventive, Look-Ahead, circuit including the necessary filter, e.g., a low-pass filter. This flow chart is executed periodically, within a fixed interval. The discreetization must ensue for a selected interval.
In Block 21 (Field 30), the variables are stored.
In Block 22 (Field 31), the analog-to-digital converter of the analog-to-digital interface 2 for processing an acceleration signal, is actuated. As soon as the analog-to-digital converter is closed, the signal is read-in into the computer (controller 3).
In Block 23 (Field 32), a part which directly depends on the input signal, is added to the value calculated in the preceding step. This calculated value y is monitored in Block 24 (decision field 33) for determining whether it exceeds a positive and/or negative threshold and, if necessary, the actuator, in particular coupling 5, is open (Block 25, Field 34).
In Blocks 26 and 27 (Fields 35 and 36), variables for the next step in accordance with the given condition and the already calculated part "temp" of the signal y, are calculated.
In Block 28 (End Field 37), a feedback is processed in a background program in which different other functions are carried out, until a next interruption for effecting a further calculation cycle is initiated.
The electronic circuit diagram of FIG. 6 for effecting the executive routine according to the block diagram of FIG. 3, will now be briefly described.
A voltage signal, corresponding to the actual acceleration, is supplied to the input J1 and then, via a low-pass filter U1, to the first band-limiting integrator U2 (integrator 11 in FIG. 3), and thereafter to the second band-limiting integrator U3 (integrator 12 in FIG. 3). The predetermined time constant in a predetermined manner is evaluated in an adjustable RC-module.
The output signals of the low pass filter U1, the integrators U2 and U3 are summarized in a summing amplifier U4 by means of series resistors to provide an evaluation signal. The output signal of the summing amplifier U4 is supplied, on one hand, to an output J2 and, on the other hand, to comparators and U10, which monitor whether a positive maximum or a negative maximum is exceeded, where the negative maximum can be preset with an inverse amplifier U7.
The output signals of the comparators U9 and U10 set two flip-flops FF1 and FF2, each of which is formed of two NAND-elements. The output signals of the flip-flops FF1 and FF2 are shown by light-emitting diodes LED D1 and LED D2. In addition, the output signals of the flip-flops FF1 and FF2 are used for switching of the coupling 5.
The solution, according to the present invention, in comparison with known solutions for preventing accidents caused by a rotating tool of a manually-operated machine tool, has an advantage consisting in that by means of an evaluation algorithm implemented advantageously in a microprocessor, or by means of a forecast evaluation, a future behavior of the machine tool can be predicted, and safety measures can be undertaken before the machine would be provided with a too large rotational pulse when an accident cannot be prevented any longer.
Thanks to a high-speed evaluation logic, the operator's intent can be correctly interpreted and a desired operational condition can be quickly reinstated after a detection of a potential accident and the execution of necessary preventive measures. A particular advantage consists in that a continuous or periodic self-test can be easily executed by using an appropriate program, as well as in a precise actuation and an aging-independent release behavior.
For implementing the invention, the following elements are necessary:
An acceleration sensor (piezo-electrical, piezo-resistive, inertial, connected into and/or integrated as a part of a microelectronic circuit);
An evaluation unit, either an analog unit formed by operational amplifiers, diodes, ets., (see FIG. 6) or a digital unit formed by a microprocessor based on an execution of corresponding process steps (FIGS. 1 and 5); and
One or several actuators for breaking the connection between the drive motor and the toolbit (e.g., an electro-magnetic friction coupling), preferably connected with a circuit breaker.
Though the present invention was shown and described with reference to preferred embodiments, various modifications thereof will be apparent to those skilled in the art and, therefore, it is not intended that the invention be limited to the disclosed embodiments and/or details thereof, and departures can be made therefrom within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10160049, | Jan 07 2010 | Black & Decker Inc. | Power tool having rotary input control |
10206731, | Jul 19 2013 | Pro-Dex, Inc. | Torque-limiting screwdrivers |
10220500, | Apr 13 2012 | Black & Decker Inc. | Electronic clutch for power tool |
10350742, | May 25 2012 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Percussion unit |
10383674, | Jun 07 2016 | PRO-DEX, INC | Torque-limiting screwdriver devices, systems, and methods |
10589413, | Jun 20 2016 | Black & Decker Inc. | Power tool with anti-kickback control system |
10675747, | Nov 20 2014 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Control method for a hand-held power tool |
10688614, | Jan 29 2016 | Hilti Aktiengesellschaft | Portable power tool |
10751866, | Jun 27 2014 | Hilti Aktiengesellschaft | Handheld power tool and control method |
10780563, | Oct 07 2016 | Makita Corporation | Electric power tool and method of controlling rotational speed of motor in electric power tool |
10953532, | Oct 07 2016 | Makita Corporation | Electric power tool configured to detect twisted motion |
10981267, | Oct 26 2017 | Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation | Kickback control methods for power tools |
11071575, | Jun 07 2016 | Pro-Dex, Inc. | Torque-limiting screwdriver devices, systems, and methods |
11072061, | Oct 23 2017 | Makita Corporation | Rotary tool |
11090128, | Aug 20 2018 | PRO-DEX, INC | Torque-limiting devices, systems, and methods |
11123854, | Jun 27 2014 | Hilti Aktiengesellschaft | Handheld power tool and control method |
11192232, | Jun 20 2016 | Black & Decker Inc. | Power tool with anti-kickback control system |
11529725, | Oct 20 2017 | Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation | Power tool including electromagnetic clutch |
11607789, | Sep 12 2019 | Makita Corporation | Technique for detecting twisted motion of electric working machine |
11607790, | Oct 26 2017 | Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation | Kickback control methods for power tools |
11648655, | Oct 26 2017 | Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation | Kickback control methods for power tools |
11705721, | Mar 10 2020 | Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation | Kickback control methods for a power tool including a force sensor |
11882991, | Aug 20 2018 | Pro-Dex, Inc. | Torque-limiting devices, systems, and methods |
11890144, | Jun 07 2016 | Pro-Dex, Inc. | Torque-limiting screwdriver devices, systems, and methods |
5879111, | Nov 11 1996 | Hilti Aktiengesellschaft | Hand-held device |
5914882, | Oct 09 1996 | Hilti Aktiengesellschaft | Device for and method of preventing accidents in hand-operated machine tools due to tool jamming |
5954457, | Nov 11 1996 | Hilti Aktiengesellschaft | Hand-held device |
6044918, | Sep 20 1995 | Hilti Aktiengesellschaft | Percussion blow added manually operable drilling tool |
7011165, | May 02 2000 | Hilti Aktiengesellschaft | Rotating electric hand tool implement with safety routine |
7055620, | Apr 06 2001 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Hand-held machine tool |
7395871, | Apr 24 2003 | Black & Decker Inc. | Method for detecting a bit jam condition using a freely rotatable inertial mass |
7410006, | Oct 20 2004 | Black & Decker Inc | Power tool anti-kickback system with rotational rate sensor |
7487845, | Apr 24 2003 | Black & Decker Inc. | Safety mechanism for a rotary hammer |
7552781, | Oct 19 2005 | Black & Decker Inc | Power tool anti-kickback system with rotational rate sensor |
7681659, | Oct 20 2004 | Black & Decker Inc. | Power tool anti-kickback system with rotational rate sensor |
7717191, | Nov 21 2007 | Black & Decker Inc | Multi-mode hammer drill with shift lock |
7717192, | Nov 21 2007 | Black & Decker Inc | Multi-mode drill with mode collar |
7730963, | Apr 24 2003 | Black & Decker Inc. | Safety mechanism for a rotary hammer |
7735575, | Nov 21 2007 | Black & Decker Inc | Hammer drill with hard hammer support structure |
7762349, | Nov 21 2007 | Black & Decker Inc | Multi-speed drill and transmission with low gear only clutch |
7770660, | Nov 21 2007 | Black & Decker Inc | Mid-handle drill construction and assembly process |
7798245, | Nov 21 2007 | Black & Decker Inc | Multi-mode drill with an electronic switching arrangement |
7854274, | Nov 21 2007 | Black & Decker Inc | Multi-mode drill and transmission sub-assembly including a gear case cover supporting biasing |
7930581, | Sep 13 2005 | ABB Patent GmbH | Automation device |
7938194, | Apr 24 2003 | Black & Decker Inc. | Safety mechanism for a rotary hammer |
7987920, | Nov 21 2007 | Black & Decker Inc. | Multi-mode drill with mode collar |
8109343, | Nov 21 2007 | Black & Decker Inc. | Multi-mode drill with mode collar |
8238379, | Sep 13 2005 | ABB Patent GmbH | Automation device |
8286723, | Jan 07 2010 | Black & Decker Inc | Power screwdriver having rotary input control |
8292001, | Nov 21 2007 | Black & Decker Inc. | Multi-mode drill with an electronic switching arrangement |
8316958, | Jul 13 2006 | Black & Decker Inc. | Control scheme for detecting and preventing torque conditions in a power tool |
8418778, | Jan 07 2010 | Black & Decker Inc | Power screwdriver having rotary input control |
8555997, | Apr 24 2003 | Black & Decker Inc. | Safety mechanism for a rotary hammer |
8561715, | Dec 16 2009 | Hilti Aktiengesellschaft | Control method for a hand-operated power tool |
8579041, | Aug 29 2008 | PELLENC SOCIETE ANONYME | Safety device for portable tools with a heat engine, capable of stopping the operation thereof after sudden, violent movements |
8727941, | Nov 10 2009 | Makita Corporation | Electric tool |
8782311, | Sep 13 2005 | ABB Patent GmbH | Automation device |
9199362, | Jan 07 2010 | Black & Decker Inc | Power tool having rotary input control |
9211636, | Jan 07 2010 | Black & Decker Inc | Power tool having rotary input control |
9266178, | Jan 07 2010 | Black & Decker Inc | Power tool having rotary input control |
9321155, | Jan 07 2010 | Black & Decker Inc | Power tool having switch and rotary input control |
9321156, | Jan 07 2010 | Black & Decker Inc | Power tool having rotary input control |
9364944, | Nov 02 2009 | Makita Corporation | Power tool |
9475180, | Jan 07 2010 | Black & Decker Inc | Power tool having rotary input control |
9505097, | May 29 2012 | Makita Corporation | Power tool |
9537692, | Aug 31 2005 | ABB Patent GmbH | Automation device operable to convert between data byte streams and frequency modulated line signals |
D703017, | May 13 2011 | Black & Decker Inc | Screwdriver |
RE44311, | Oct 20 2004 | Black & Decker Inc. | Power tool anti-kickback system with rotational rate sensor |
RE44993, | Oct 20 2004 | Black & Decker Inc. | Power tool anti-kickback system with rotational rate sensor |
RE45112, | Oct 20 2004 | Black & Decker Inc. | Power tool anti-kickback system with rotational rate sensor |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3969661, | Aug 20 1973 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Motor control apparatus |
4559600, | Feb 28 1983 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Monitoring machine tool conditions by measuring a force component and a vibration component at a fundamental natural frequency |
4604006, | Nov 20 1981 | Nitto Kohki Co., Ltd. | Drilling machine having electromagnetic base |
4650375, | Dec 02 1985 | James W., Millsap; Peter, Miller | Drill braking system |
4813821, | Jun 06 1985 | Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Thread cutting machine |
4831364, | Mar 14 1986 | Hitachi Koki Company, Limited | Drilling machine |
4985841, | Mar 25 1986 | Fanuc Ltd. | Tapping control system |
5237540, | Aug 21 1992 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation; Schlumberger Technology Corp | Logging while drilling tools utilizing magnetic positioner assisted phase shifts |
5265682, | Jun 25 1991 | SCHLUMBERGER WCP LIMITED | Steerable rotary drilling systems |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Dec 27 1994 | Hilti Aktiengesellschaft | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jan 03 1995 | GUZZELLA, LINO | Hilti Aktiengesellschaft | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 007399 | /0505 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jun 05 2000 | M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
May 12 2004 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Jun 06 2008 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Dec 17 1999 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jun 17 2000 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 17 2000 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Dec 17 2002 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Dec 17 2003 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jun 17 2004 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 17 2004 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Dec 17 2006 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Dec 17 2007 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jun 17 2008 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 17 2008 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Dec 17 2010 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |