A bone regeneration membrane containing resorbable or degradable, polymeric and/or polymeric-ceramic material with a glass transition temperature in the range of -30° to +200°C
The novel membrane can be used for the spontaneous regeneration of bone and for the improved application of autologous or allogenic graft materials and therapeutic agents.
|
1. A thin, resorbable bone regeneration membrane containing interconnected micropores and having a thickness between 0.05 mm and 5.0 mm, said membrane comprising resorbable or degradable polymeric material wherein the glass transition temperature of said polymeric material is in the range of body temperature to 200°C and the molecular weight distribution of said polymeric material is in the range of 1.2 to 100∅
30. A thin, resorbable bone regeneration membrane containing interconnected micropores and having a thickness between 0.05 mm and 5.0 mm, said membrane consisting of resorbable or degradable polymeric material having a glass transition temperature in the range of body temperature to 200°C and the molecular weight distribution of said polymeric material is in the range of 1.2 to 100∅
25. A bone regeneration membrane comprising resorbable or degradable polymeric and/or polymeric-ceramic material wherein the glass transition temperature of said polymeric and/or polymeric-ceramic material is in the range of body temperature to 200°C and the molecular weight distribution of said polymeric material is in the range of 1.2 to 100.0, said membrane having interconnected micropores therein, wherein said membrane further contains antineoplastic agents.
24. A bone regeneration membrane comprising resorbable or degradable polymeric and/or polymeric-ceramic material wherein the glass transition temperature of said polymeric and/or polymeric-ceramic material is in the range of body temperature to 200°C and the molecular weight distribution of said polymeric material is in the range of 1.2 to 100.0, said membrane having interconnected micropores therein, wherein said membrane further contains antiosteomyelitis agents.
23. A bone regeneration membrane comprising resorbable or degradable polymeric and/or polymeric-ceramic material wherein the glass transition temperature of said polymeric and/or polymeric-ceramic material is in the range of body temperature to 200°C and the molecular weight distribution of said polymeric material is in the range of 1.2 to 100.0, said membrane having interconnected micropores therein, and further comprising reinforcement including resorbable and/or degradable fibers.
27. A bone regeneration membrane comprising resorbable or degradable polymeric and/or polymeric-ceramic material wherein the glass transition temperature of said polymeric and/or polymeric-ceramic material is in the range of body temperature to 200°C and the molecular weight distribution of said polymeric material is in the range of 1.2 to 100.0, said membrane having interconnected micropores therein, wherein said membrane further contains osteoinductive agents of autogenic, allogenic, xenogenic, or synthetic origin.
26. A bone regeneration membrane comprising resorbable or degradable polymeric and/or polymeric-ceramic material wherein the glass transition temperature of said polymeric and/or polymeric-ceramic material is in the range of body temperature to 200°C and the molecular weight distribution of said polymeric material is in the range of 1.2 to 100.0, said membrane having interconnected micropores therein, wherein said membrane further contains osteoconductive agents of autogenic, allogenic, xenogenic, or synthetic origin.
28. A bone regeneration membrane comprising resorbable or degradable polymeric and/or polymeric-ceramic material wherein the glass transition temperature of said polymeric and/or polymeric-ceramic material is in the range of body temperature to 200°C and the molecular weight distribution of said polymeric material is in the range of 1.2 to 100.0, said membrane having interconnected micropores therein, wherein said membrane is formed in a tubular form with a longitudinal slit adapted to form semi-occlusive fits at the two extremities of the tube formed by said membrane for fixation to bones.
29. A bone regeneration membrane comprising resorbable or degradable polymeric and/or polymeric-ceramic material wherein the glass transition temperature of said polymeric and/or polymeric-ceramic material is in the range of body temperature to 200°C and the molecular weight distribution of said polymeric material is in the range of 1.2 to 100.0, said membrane having interconnected micropores therein, wherein said membrane is formed in a tubular form with a longitudinal slit having ends shaped to form semi-occlusive fits over cortical bone ends and within medullary canals of long or tubular bones.
2. A membrane according to
3. A membrane according to
4. A membrane according to
5. A membrane according to
6. A membrane according to
9. A membrane according to
11. A membrane according to
12. A membrane according to
14. A membrane according to
15. A membrane according to
18. A membrane according to
19. A membrane according to
21. A membrane according to
22. A membrane according to
|
This application is a file wrapper continuation of application Ser. No. 580,180 filed on Sep. 10, 1990, now abandoned.
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a bone regeneration membrane containing resorbable or degradable polymeric and/or polymeric-ceramic material.
Diaphyseal bone loss results from high-energy trauma, infection, or resection performed for skeletal neoplasia. The numerous treatment modalities attest to the difficulty in obtaining reliable and satisfactory reconstitution of skeletal long bone defects. Methods for treating diaphyseal bone defects include: autologous cancellous or cortical bone grafts, autologous vascularized bone transplants and grafts, xenogenic bone grafts, allogenic bone grafts, hydroxyapatite and/or tricalcium phosphate ceramics implants, coral, natural polymers like collagen, synthetic polymers like polyethylene and polyglycolide, osteoinductive proteins such as bone morphogenetic protein, and bone transport techniques. All these methods have failed in producing predictable reconstruction of cortico-cancellous bone loss from diaphyseal segment of the human skeleton.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Various proposals have been made for the application of membranes containing resorbable or degradable polymeric material for bone regeneration purposes. These membranes degrade in the body over a period of time and may be absorbed by the bone or body tissues.
From an article of Magnusson, Batich and Collins, published in the J. Periodontol., Jan. 1988 pp. 1-5, it is known to utilize very thin membranes of unspecified porosity and consisting of low-molecular weight polylactic acid for the regeneration of the dental cementum.
It is also known from Dahlin, Linde, Gottlow and Nyman (Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, May 1988, pp. 672-676) to use a porous polytetrafluoroethylene membrane for healing bone in the jaw.
It is further known from Farso-Nielsen, Karring and Gogolewski (IADR General Session, Mar. 7-11, 1990, Cincinnati, Ohio) to use elastic biodegradable polyurethane membranes of unspecified structure for healing bone defects in rabbits.
From Warrer, Karring, Nyman and Gogolewski (paper submitted to J.Periodontol. 1990) it is further known that the use of membranes consisting of unspecified polylactic acid or polyurethane polymers failed to produce regeneration of periodontal defects.
With all these prior art membranes of largely unspecified structure and chemistry clinical results are rather unpredictable and vary from author to author.
The present invention is intended to remedy these drawbacks, It solves the problem of how to design a membrane containing resorbable or degradable polymeric and/or polymeric-ceramic material having a well-defined structure and chemistry which--when properly fashioned and applied--will promote spontaneous human bone regeneration as well as improve the efficacy of adjunctive bone conductive and inductive substances.
Briefly described, the invention comprises a bone regeneration membrane containing resorbable or degradable polymeric and/or polymeric-ceramic material having a glass transition temperature in the range of -30° C. to 200°C, the membrane having micropores therein. At least 90 percent of the micropores have a diameter in the range of 0.001 to 50.0 μm and the overall porosity of the membrane is less than 90 percent.
The membrane advantage contains osteoconductive or osteoinductive agents of autogenic, allogenic, xenogenic or synthetic origin.
The polymeric or polymeric-ceramic material used for the membranes according to the invention must have the glass transition temperature in the range of -30° to +200°C, Preferably the glass transition temperature of said polymeric and/or polymeric-ceramic material is in the range of +10° to +90°C and most preferably between +30° to +70°C
Glass transition temperature has surprisingly turned out to be of great importance, since application of membranes made of low glass transition temperature polymeric materials to bone defects have resulted in undesired external callus formation.
Chemically the membrane is prepared from highly purified resorbable and/or degradable polymers and/or polymer-ceramics such as polyhydroxyacids, polysaccharides, polyamines, polyaminoacids, polyorthoesters, polyanhydrides, collagen or composites thereof with tricalcium phosphate and/or hydroxyapatite, whereby preferably at least 90 weight percent of the material has a molecular weight in the range of 5,000 to 1,000,000, preferably in the range of 25,000 to 150,000 and most preferably in the range of 30,000 to 70,000.
In terms of molecular weight distribution, (or polydispersity) the polymeric and/or polymeric-ceramic material should have a polydispersity in the range of 1.2 to 100.0, preferably in the range of 1.9 to 2.5.
Structurally the membrane is generally thin and preferably microporous. The thickness of the membrane can be controlled to meet structural demands of the proposed implantation site, but should range between 0.05 to 5.0 mm, preferably between 0.2 to 3.0 mm and most preferably between 0.4 to 1.5 mm. The specific pore size, shape and structure to be selected for a certain application is variable to a large extent, whereby at least 90 percent of the micropores present in the polymeric material should have a diameter below 500 μm, preferably in the range of 0.01 to 50.0 μm and most preferably in the range of 0.1 to 5 μm. What is essential is that the micropores are permeable for nutritional fluids. Therefore the micropores within the membrane should be preferably interconnected to allow liquids penetration and circulation.
A membrane having the structural and chemical features according to the invention exhibits a resorption rate in vivo in the range from 2 weeks to 1 year and longer. The resorption rate can be adjusted to a desired value (e.g. to over one year for the treatment of large defects) by altering the polymer molecular weight, the polymer chain orientation and crystallinity, physical structure, chemical composition, presence and extent of voids, additives and so on.
The membranes can be used in a planar form, but generally are prefashioned or modified intraoperatively by the surgeon to conform to a curved surface, preferably a rectilinear surface. Most suitable are membranes with an adaptable surface, preferably a cylindrical surface, which most preferably is of tubular (circular cylinder) form.
In a preferred embodiment the membrane according to the invention is shaped in tubular form, preferably with a longitudinal slit to allow variability of the tubular diameter over a wide range. The diameter of the tubular membrane should match the dimensions of the bone to be treated, e.g. 4.0 to 50.0 mm for tibia reconstructions. A thin membrane of e.g. 0.1 mm thickness can also be rolled up either pre- or intraoperatively to form a final tubular implant with a wall thickness of e.g. 3.1 mm.
In a preferred embodiment the overlapping, intersected tubular membrane according to the invention provides semi-occlusive fits at the two extremities of the tube for better external adaptation to the cortical bone ends and/or internal adaptation within medullary canals of long or tubular bones.
It is of importance that the internal membrane tube to be inserted into an intramedullary canal is formed on a mandrel which has an external diameter at least 1.1 to 3.0 times bigger than the diameter of the intramedullary canal. The external membrane tube should be formed on a mandrel which has an external diameter which is at least 1.1 to 3.0 times smaller than the external diameter of the bone. Due to its "shape memory" the tubular membrane can be easily placed and fit on the bone to be treated.
If two tubular membranes are used (an external over the cortical bone ends and a internal within the medullary canal) they can either be used with or without spacers between the two tubular membranes. The two membranes can either be supplied preoperatively as a single unit (with interconnecting structures) or can be assembled intraoperatively by the surgeon. Accordingly one membrane is rolled in a tubular fashion to obtain a press fit into the medullary canal of both bone fragments, and a second membrane is rolled into a tube to form a semi-occlusive external sleeve, bridging the two bone fragment ends. The space between the two membranes forms a new artificial cortex that can be filled with a variety of therapeutic substances, such as autologous bone, allogenic bone, demineralized bone powder extracts, bone morphogenetic protein isolates, antibiotics, or antineoplastic drugs. The walls of the membranes can either be continuous or intersected longitudinally for better adaptation of the membrane on the bone. If necessary, the space between the inner and outer tubular membranes can be maintained in their relative position by means of spokes, ribs or other corrugated elements attached permanently, or inserted between the membrane tubes upon surgery.
The membrane tube can be used as a complete construction or only as a part of the construction (e.g. a half construction) depending on the bone defect to be treated.
The membranes according to the invention can be used for a variety of applications to span osseous defects that have been conventionally stabilized with an external fixator, intramedullary rod, or systems of plates and screws, of which the most important are listed below:
as a tissue separator which promotes and protects osseous regeneration;
for the treatment of osseous defects secondary to trauma, infection, neoplasm, or surgical resection;
as cortical spacer across bone defects;
as an osseous activity barrier that confines bone regeneration to desired regions and prevents the formation of synostosis, physeal bars, or ectopic bone;
as a spacer for skeletal resection, revision arthroplasty, or arthrodesis of human joints;
as a container for autologous or allogenic graft materials; and
as a combined bone grafting and/or drug delivery system.
The membrane according to the invention, therefore, offers a novel treatment that reliably promotes osseous healing with and without adjunctive therapies, while posing no toxic risks or requirements for extensive surgery for implantation or removal. The membrane can be preoperatively shaped and adjusted by the surgeon to conform and integrate with a wide range of anatomical defects and locations.
The advantages offered by the invention are mainly the following:
maintainance of a physical barrier that contains osseous activity of the host bone, while simultaneously protecting this osseous activity from nonosteogenic and interfering cell lines.
protection of the cortical and medullary canal osteogenic capacity from surrounding soft tissues and inflammatory reactions.
The various features of novelty which characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed to and forming part of this disclosure. For the better understanding of the invention, its operating advantages and specific objects attained by its use, reference should be had to the accompanying drawings, examples and descriptive matter in which are illustrated and described preferred embodiments of the invention.
In the drawings,
FIG. 1 is a simplified perspective view of a membrane in accordance with the invention;
FIG. 2 is a side elevation schematically illustrating technique for applying a membrane in accordance with the invention;
FIG. 3 is a side elevation schematically illustrating an application of membranes in the intermedullary canal as well as externally; and
FIG. 4 is an illustration of an application similar to FIG. 3 wherein the space between membranes is filled with autogenic cancellous bone graft.
The membranes according to the invention can be produced by any technique known to those skilled in the art, e.g. by solvent-casting, extrusion, injection-moulding, vacuum-forming, blowing, spraying, brushing, polymerization, compression-moulding, etc.
Two specific examples are given below:
Poly(L-lactide) with a viscosity-average molecular weight in the range of 15,000-700,000 Daltons were purified twice by dissolution in chloroform followed by precipitation with methanol. Polymers were dried under vacuum to constant weight and kept in a dessicator over molecular sieves. Microporous, resorbable membranes were prepared in the phase-reverse technique. Flat membranes were wetted in polar or nonpolar liquids and preshaped over mandrels of suitable shape, to fit the approximate diameter of the implantation site. The membranes were preshaped to the anatomy of the bone to be covered.
Wet membranes rolled up on the mandrels were covered with aluminium foil to protect them against unrolling and placed at 50°-150°C in the vacuum oven for 0.5-6.0 hours. After removal of the aluminium foil the membrane 1 had the configuration as shown in FIG. 1. Thanks to the longitudinal slit 2 parallel to its central axis 3 and its inherent shape memory the membrane was adaptable in diameter over a large extent to match bone ends of different sizes and diameters. The membrane produced according to this example had a glass transition temperature of +50°C, The pore size of the membrane was in the range of 0.1 to 1.0 μm and its thickness was 1.0 mm. Viscosity--average molecular weight of the polymeric membrane according to this example was 75,000, and its molecular weight distribution was 2.2.
The tubular membranes were used to cover a diphyseal defect of ten rabbits, Two months after surgery the canal created by the membrane according to this example was filled with osseous tissue.
Microporous resorbable membranes were prepared from poly(L-lactide) with a viscosity-average molecular weight of 15,000 to 100,000 Daltons according to the method of manufacture described in Example I.
The membrane produced according to this example had a glass transition temperature of 50°C and showed a porosity in the range of 10 to 50 μm and a thickness of 0.9 mm.
Numerous controlled experiments by the applicants have demonstrated that the novel membranes obtained by the described methods of manufacture promote bone growth in a reliable manner and further improve the efficacy of adjunctive bone conductive and inductive substances.
The membrane obtained by the method according to Example II was sterilized with ethylene oxide and implanted in 15 mature rabbits, to cover mid-diaphyseal defects of 10 mm created in the radius of a limb. An identical, but untreated defect on the other limb served as a control.
Within one week the membrane implants were filled with tissues that progressively differentiated into osseous tissue. By one month, further osseous formation had bridged 40 to 95% of the defect. New bone was formed within the inner canal of the polymeric membrane tube. In contrast, the control defects were occupied by overlying muscle and soft tissues.
The application of the membranes according to the invention is now further described by having reference to the drawings:
In a first application, shown in FIG. 2, a tubular membrane 1 was pulled over the aligned and correctly positioned extremities 4,5 of a fractured long bone 6 and affixed thereto by means of wires 7,8. Of course the membrane 1 can be affixed to the bone ends 4,5 by a variety of suitable means including external suture, metal or polymer screws, and/or plate and band combinations. The whole assembly was further fixed by means of an external fixator 9.
In a second application, shown in FIG. 3, prior to the fixation of the external membrane 1, a second tubular membrane 11 was previously inserted in the intramedullary canal 12, thereby forming a confined space 13, which as shown in FIG. 4 was filled with autogenic cancellous bone graft 14.
Gogolewski, Sylwester, Perren, Stephan M., Meinig, Richard P.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10010432, | Oct 22 2014 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use |
10016534, | Nov 17 2008 | PETVIVO HOLDINGS, INC | Protein biomaterial and biocoacervate vessel graft systems and methods of making and using thereof |
10022132, | Dec 12 2013 | Conventus Orthopaedics, Inc. | Tissue displacement tools and methods |
10064740, | Feb 06 2003 | Depuy Synthes Products, LLC | Intervertebral implant |
10076342, | Dec 12 2013 | Conventus Orthopaedics, Inc. | Tissue displacement tools and methods |
10105237, | May 12 2009 | Bullard Spine, LLC | Multi-layer osteoinductive, osteogenic, and osteoconductive carrier |
10111697, | Sep 26 2003 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Device for delivering viscous material |
10130489, | Apr 12 2010 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Expandable vertebral implant |
10130492, | Oct 22 2014 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use |
10137003, | Nov 16 2007 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Low profile intervertebral implant |
10206781, | May 13 2014 | The University of Akron; Houston Methodist Hospital | Modular device for preventing compression and instability in a segmental defect repair scaffold |
10258472, | Mar 31 2015 | DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC | Bone graft cage |
10292822, | Mar 31 2015 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Bone graft cage |
10314717, | Jan 12 2009 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Expandable vertebral prosthesis |
10433976, | Nov 07 2008 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Zero-profile interbody spacer and coupled plate assembly |
10492922, | Feb 19 2002 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Intervertebral implant |
10492928, | Apr 12 2010 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Angling inserter tool for expandable vertebral implant |
10500053, | Feb 28 2011 | DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC | Modular tissue scaffolds |
10507110, | Jun 13 2016 | DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC | Bone graft cage |
10507117, | Dec 21 2010 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use |
10512548, | Feb 27 2006 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Intervertebral implant with fixation geometry |
10531960, | Nov 07 2008 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Zero-profile interbody spacer and coupled plate assembly |
10543102, | Nov 16 2007 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Low profile intervertebral implant |
10603087, | Jan 14 2008 | Conventus Orthopaedics, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for fracture repair |
10660765, | Feb 06 2003 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Intervertebral implant |
10695181, | Feb 16 2016 | DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC | Bone graft cage |
10702394, | Oct 22 2014 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use |
10898343, | May 12 2009 | Bullard Spine, LLC | Multi-layer osteoinductive, osteogenic, and osteoconductive carrier |
10918426, | Jul 04 2017 | CONVENTUS ORTHOPAEDICS, INC | Apparatus and methods for treatment of a bone |
11051944, | Jun 13 2016 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Bone graft cage |
11298243, | Apr 12 2010 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Angling inserter tool for expandable vertebral implant |
11399878, | Jan 14 2008 | Conventus Orthopaedics, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for fracture repair |
11399951, | Jan 12 2009 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Expandable vertebral prosthesis |
11458027, | Dec 21 2010 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use |
11504240, | Jun 04 2020 | DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC | Modular bone graft cage |
11517444, | Nov 07 2008 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Zero-profile interbody spacer and coupled plate assembly |
11540927, | Oct 22 2014 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use |
11596419, | Mar 09 2017 | FLOWER ORTHOPEDICS CORPORATION | Plating depth gauge and countersink instrument |
11612492, | Nov 07 2008 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Zero-profile interbody spacer and coupled plate assembly |
11696837, | Feb 27 2006 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Intervertebral implant with fixation geometry |
11793644, | Feb 28 2011 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Modular tissue scaffolds |
11819380, | Oct 13 2016 | Devices for tissue augmentation | |
11890371, | Dec 26 2007 | PETVIVO HOLDINGS, INC | Biocompatible protein-based particles and methods thereof |
5868746, | Mar 01 1994 | Biomet Manufacturing, LLC | Method and apparatus for securing adjacent bone portions |
6031148, | Dec 06 1990 | W L GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC | Implantable bioabsorbable article |
6083264, | Jun 30 1998 | McDonnell Douglas Corporation | Implant material for replacing or augmenting living bone tissue involving thermoplastic syntactic foam |
6146420, | Dec 10 1997 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc | Osteogenic fusion device |
6169046, | Sep 10 1996 | DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN INORGANIC MATERIALS | Absorbable barrier membrane |
6312467, | Jul 18 1995 | IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC | Method of restructuring bone |
6328765, | Dec 03 1998 | W L GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC | Methods and articles for regenerating living tissue |
6364909, | Jul 18 1995 | IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC | Method of restructuring bone |
6391059, | Apr 07 1998 | MacroPore, Inc. | Membrane with tissue-guiding surface corrugations |
6409764, | Dec 03 1998 | W L GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC | Methods and articles for regenerating bone or peridontal tissue |
6527810, | Oct 01 1997 | WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC | Bone substitutes |
6565606, | Sep 09 1998 | Tigran Technologies AB | Implant, method of making the same and use the same |
6579533, | Nov 30 1999 | Bioretec Ltd | Bioabsorbable drug delivery system for local treatment and prevention of infections |
6613089, | Oct 25 2000 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc | Laterally expanding intervertebral fusion device |
6648916, | Dec 10 1997 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc | Osteogenic fusion device |
6719793, | Jul 18 1995 | Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. | Method of restructuring bone |
6736848, | May 29 2001 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc | Method and apparatus for using formable polymers for orthopedic support |
6758863, | Oct 25 2000 | VALVE HOLDINGS, L L C | Vertically expanding intervertebral body fusion device |
6780192, | Oct 24 2000 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc | Osteogenic packing device and method |
6855169, | Feb 28 2001 | Synthes USA, LLC | Demineralized bone-derived implants |
6977095, | Oct 01 1997 | WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC | Process for producing rigid reticulated articles |
6986788, | Jan 30 1998 | Synthes USA, LLC | Intervertebral allograft spacer |
7115146, | Mar 22 2000 | Synthes USA, LLC | Multipiece implants formed of bone material |
7179293, | Dec 10 1997 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Osteogenic fusion device |
7226482, | Sep 01 2004 | Synthes USA, LLC | Multipiece allograft implant |
7232464, | Feb 19 2002 | DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC | Intervertebral implant |
7250550, | Oct 22 2004 | WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC | Synthetic bone substitute material |
7285135, | Dec 10 1997 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Osteogenic fusion device |
7300465, | Jan 30 1998 | Synthes USA, LLC | Intervertebral allograft spacer |
7550011, | Oct 24 2000 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Osteogenic packing device and method |
7601173, | Sep 02 2003 | Synthes USA, LLC | Multipiece allograft implant |
7608113, | Feb 28 2001 | Synthes USA, LLC | Demineralized bone implants |
7618456, | Feb 19 2002 | DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC | Intervertebral implant |
7674296, | Apr 21 2005 | Globus Medical Inc | Expandable vertebral prosthesis |
7732198, | Oct 06 2003 | Celgen AG | Device for the regeneration of tissue, specifically bone regeneration by means of callus distraction |
7740897, | Oct 01 1997 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | Process for producing rigid reticulated articles |
7753963, | Feb 28 2001 | Synthes USA, LLC | Demineralized bone-derived implants |
7754246, | Sep 09 2005 | Agnovos Healthcare, LLC | Composite bone graft substitute cement and articles produced therefrom |
7763079, | Dec 10 1997 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc | Osteogenic fusion device |
7766972, | Oct 22 2004 | Wright Medical Technology, Inc. | Synthetic, malleable bone graft substitute material |
7815826, | May 12 2004 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Manufacturing process, such as three-dimensional printing, including solvent vapor filming and the like |
7828845, | Oct 25 2000 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Laterally expanding intervertebral fusion device |
7846207, | Feb 06 2003 | DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC | Intervertebral implant |
7862616, | Feb 06 2003 | DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC | Intervertebral implant |
8025903, | Sep 09 2005 | Agnovos Healthcare, LLC | Composite bone graft substitute cement and articles produced therefrom |
8043377, | Sep 02 2006 | Osprey Biomedical, Inc. | Implantable intervertebral fusion device |
8128696, | May 11 2005 | Mathys AG Bettlach | System and implant for ligament reconstruction or bone reconstruction |
8153591, | Aug 26 2004 | PETVIVO HOLDINGS, INC | Protein biomaterials and biocoacervates and methods of making and using thereof |
8177845, | Oct 24 2000 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Osteogenic packing device and method |
8177848, | Dec 10 1997 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Osteogenic fusion device |
8282683, | Apr 12 2010 | Globus Medical, Inc | Expandable vertebral implant |
8287538, | Jan 14 2008 | CONVENTUS ORTHOPAEDICS; CONVENTUS ORTHOPAEDICS, INC | Apparatus and methods for fracture repair |
8465537, | Jun 17 2003 | PETVIVO HOLDINGS, INC | Encapsulated or coated stent systems |
8497236, | Feb 13 1998 | Zimmer Orthobiologics, Inc. | Implantable putty material |
8529939, | Dec 08 2003 | PETVIVO HOLDINGS, INC | Mucoadhesive drug delivery devices and methods of making and using thereof |
8540774, | Nov 16 2007 | Depuy Synthes Products, LLC | Low profile intervertebral implant |
8551525, | Dec 23 2010 | Bioventus, LLC | Bone graft materials and methods |
8579908, | Sep 26 2003 | Depuy Synthes Products, LLC | Device for delivering viscous material |
8613938, | Nov 15 2010 | ZIMMER ORTHOBIOLOGICS, INC | Bone void fillers |
8623393, | Apr 29 2002 | PETVIVO HOLDINGS, INC | Biomatrix structural containment and fixation systems and methods of use thereof |
8685102, | Dec 10 1997 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Osteogenic fusion device |
8685464, | Sep 09 2005 | Agnovos Healthcare, LLC | Composite bone graft substitute cement and articles produced therefrom |
8685465, | Sep 09 2005 | Agnovos Healthcare, LLC | Composite bone graft substitute cement and articles produced therefrom |
8690874, | Dec 22 2000 | Zimmer Orthobiologics, Inc. | Composition and process for bone growth and repair |
8697107, | Apr 27 2012 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.; Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc | Flowable implant with crosslinkable surface membrane |
8709085, | Feb 06 2003 | Depuy Synthes Products, LLC | Intervertebral implant |
8715354, | Feb 06 2003 | Depuy Synthes Products, LLC | Intervertebral implant |
8721711, | Jun 20 2007 | Oregon Health & Science University | Graft having microporous membrane for uniform fluid infusion |
8721723, | Jan 12 2009 | Globus Medical, Inc.; Globus Medical, Inc | Expandable vertebral prosthesis |
8722783, | Nov 30 2006 | SMITH & NEPHEW UK LIMITED | Fiber reinforced composite material |
8742072, | Dec 21 2006 | Zimmer Orthobiologics, Inc. | Bone growth particles and osteoinductive composition thereof |
8764831, | Feb 06 2003 | DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC | Intervertebral implant |
8808255, | Dec 12 2008 | Oregon Health & Science University | Drug delivery cuff |
8871267, | Sep 25 1998 | PETVIVO HOLDINGS, INC | Protein matrix materials, devices and methods of making and using thereof |
8906022, | Mar 08 2010 | CONVENTUS ORTHOPAEDICS, INC ; CONVENTUS ORTHOPAEDICS | Apparatus and methods for securing a bone implant |
8961518, | Jan 20 2010 | CONVENTUS ORTHOPAEDICS, INC ; CONVENTUS ORTHOPAEDICS | Apparatus and methods for bone access and cavity preparation |
9000066, | Apr 19 2007 | SMITH & NEPHEW UK LIMITED | Multi-modal shape memory polymers |
9005295, | Nov 16 2007 | DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC | Low profile intervertebral implant |
9039775, | Mar 31 2003 | DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC | Spinal fixation plates |
9060823, | Mar 29 2011 | Smith & Nephew, Inc | Fracture fixation systems having intramedullary support |
9107937, | Aug 26 2003 | PETVIVO HOLDINGS, INC | Wound treatments with crosslinked protein amorphous biomaterials |
9120919, | Dec 23 2003 | Smith & Nephew, Inc | Tunable segmented polyacetal |
9180224, | Sep 09 2005 | Agnovos Healthcare, LLC | Composite bone graft substitute cement and articles produced therefrom |
9192419, | Nov 07 2008 | DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC | Zero-profile interbody spacer and coupled plate assembly |
9205030, | Jul 30 2010 | KINKI UNIVERSITY | Hard tissue regeneration material and hard tissue regeneration method |
9220596, | Dec 23 2010 | Bioventus, LLC | Bone graft materials and methods |
9220604, | Dec 21 2010 | DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC | Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use |
9241809, | Dec 21 2010 | DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC | Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use |
9308293, | Apr 19 2007 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Multi-modal shape memory polymers |
9320549, | Mar 31 2003 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Spinal fixation plates |
9402735, | Nov 07 2008 | DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC | Zero-profile interbody spacer and coupled plate assembly |
9414935, | Nov 07 2008 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Zero-profile interbody spacer and coupled plate assembly |
9452049, | Nov 24 2008 | Queensland University of Technology | Systems and methods to affect anatomical structures |
9463097, | Feb 06 2003 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Intervertebral implant |
9486316, | Sep 30 2011 | Prime Merger Sub, LLC | Osteoconductive implants and methods of using same |
9498561, | Jul 10 2009 | Orthorebirth Co. Ltd.; NAGOYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | Fiber wadding for filling bone defects |
9517093, | Jan 14 2008 | Conventus Orthopaedics, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for fracture repair |
9539104, | Sep 30 2011 | Prime Merger Sub, LLC | Osteoconductive implants and methods of using same |
9539365, | Jul 10 2009 | Orthorebirth Co. Ltd.; NAGOYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | Fiber wadding for filling bone defects |
9572681, | Feb 19 2002 | DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS, INC | Intervertebral implant |
9642658, | Oct 15 2008 | OrthoClip LLC | Device and method for delivery of therapeutic agents via internal implants |
9707091, | Apr 12 2010 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Expandable vertebral implant |
9730739, | Jan 15 2010 | Conventus Orthopaedics, Inc. | Rotary-rigid orthopaedic rod |
9744049, | Nov 16 2007 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Low profile intervertebral implant |
9770534, | Apr 19 2007 | SMITH & NEPHEW UK LIMITED | Graft fixation |
9788870, | Jan 14 2008 | Conventus Orthopaedics, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for fracture repair |
9795430, | Mar 08 2010 | Conventus Orthopaedics, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for securing a bone implant |
9815240, | Apr 18 2007 | Smith & Nephew, Inc | Expansion moulding of shape memory polymers |
9848889, | Jan 20 2010 | Conventus Orthopaedics, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for bone access and cavity preparation |
9848992, | Dec 21 2010 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use |
9867718, | Oct 22 2014 | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc | Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of use |
9913735, | Apr 12 2010 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Angling inserter tool for expandable vertebral implant |
9924990, | Mar 08 2010 | Conventus Orthopaedics, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for securing a bone implant |
9962268, | Jan 12 2009 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Expandable vertebral prosthesis |
9993277, | Mar 08 2010 | Conventus Orthopaedics, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for securing a bone implant |
9999705, | Aug 26 2003 | Gel-Del Technologies, Inc. | Protein biomaterials and biocoacervates and methods of making and using thereof |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3710789, | |||
3901810, | |||
3938515, | Dec 20 1971 | ALZA Corporation | Novel drug permeable wall |
4011602, | Oct 06 1975 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Porous expandable device for attachment to bone tissue |
4309488, | Jun 23 1978 | Battelle-Institut e.V. | Implantable bone replacement materials based on calcium phosphate ceramic material in a matrix and process for the production thereof |
4550449, | Nov 08 1982 | DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc | Absorbable bone fixation device |
4637931, | Oct 09 1984 | United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army | Polyactic-polyglycolic acid copolymer combined with decalcified freeze-dried bone for use as a bone repair material |
4674488, | Mar 04 1985 | Baxter International Inc | Method of treating bone fractures to reduce formation of fibrous adhesions |
4795467, | Mar 28 1985 | NEUCOLL, INC | Xenogeneic collagen/mineral preparations in bone repair |
4842604, | Dec 19 1985 | The Dow Chemical Company | Composites of unsintered calcium phosphates and synthetic biodegradable polymers useful as hard tissue prosthetics |
4863472, | Sep 05 1986 | Biocon Oy | Bone graft implant |
4963145, | Jul 09 1983 | Sumitomo Cement Co., Ltd. | Porous ceramic material and processes for preparing same |
5007930, | Feb 19 1985 | The Dow Chemical Company | Composites of unsintered calcium phosphates and synthetic biodegradable polymers useful as hard tissue prosthetics |
5024841, | Jun 30 1988 | ANGIOTECH PHARMACEUTICALS US , INC | Collagen wound healing matrices and process for their production |
5250584, | Aug 31 1988 | G-C Dental Industrial Corp. | Periodontium-regenerative materials |
CH1170001, | |||
DE2815934, | |||
EP11528, | |||
EP295041, | |||
EP321442, | |||
EP349505, | |||
GB2215209, | |||
WO8808305, | |||
WO9013302, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 20 1993 | Laboratorium fur experimentelle Chirurgie | Synthes | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 006558 | /0643 | |
May 07 1993 | Laboratorium fur experimentalle Chirurgie, Forschungsinstitut | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jun 02 2000 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Mar 22 2001 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Mar 22 2001 | M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Mar 31 2001 | LSM1: Pat Hldr no Longer Claims Small Ent Stat as Indiv Inventor. |
Mar 31 2001 | RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned. |
Mar 31 2005 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Apr 20 2009 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Oct 14 2009 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 14 2000 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 14 2001 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 14 2001 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 14 2003 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 14 2004 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 14 2005 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 14 2005 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 14 2007 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 14 2008 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 14 2009 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 14 2009 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 14 2011 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |