An aqueous composition for the protection of metal surfaces against corrosion includes, as an emulsion in water at least one overbased compound which is a water-insoluble salt. The overbased compound has a basic neutralization number of more than 40. In addition to the overbased compound, the aqueous composition also includes at least one surfactant constituted by an ammonium salt of an organic acid.
|
1. An aqueous composition for the protection of metal surfaces against corrosion comprising, as an emulsion in water:
a) at least one overbased compound which is a water-insoluble salt, wherein the overbased compound has a basic neutralization number of more than 40; and b) at least one surfactant comprising an ammonium salt of an organic acid.
16. A method of coating, comprising coating an aqueous composition on a substrate, wherein the aqueous composition comprises, as an emulsion in water:
a) at least one overbased compound which is a water-insoluble salt, wherein the overbased compound has a basic neutralization number of more than 40; and b) at least one surfactant comprising an ammonium salt of an organic acid.
17. A method of forming an anticorrosion paint, comprising combining an aqueous composition and a paint component, wherein the aqueous composition comprises, as an emulsion in water:
a) at least one overbased compound which is a water-insoluble salt, wherein the overbased compound has a basic neutralization number of more than 40; and b) at least one surfactant comprising an ammonium salt of an organic acid.
19. A method of forming an anticorrosion primer, comprising combining an aqueous composition and a primer component, wherein the aqueous composition comprises, as an emulsion in water:
a) at least one overbased compound which is a water-insoluble salt, wherein the overbased compound has a basic neutralization number of more than 40; and b) at least one surfactant comprising an ammonium salt of an organic acid.
3. The composition of
4. The composition of
6. The composition of
7. The composition of
8. The composition of
9. The composition of
11. The composition of
12. The composition of
13. The composition of
14. The composition of
15. The composition of
18. The method of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention concerns an aqueous composition for the protection of a metal surface against corrosion, in particular a coating composition which can be applied directly to the surface or used as an additive in a paint for application to the surface.
2. Description of the Prior Art
A number of coating compositions have been proposed for the protection of ferrous and non-ferrous metals and alloys thereof against corrosion. Anticorrosion coatings are obtained by applying the compositions to the surfaces. The coatings obtained may be permanent for (example paint) or temporary (for example protective oils or waxes which can be eliminated by detergents or solvents). The compositions contain active elements and film-forming agents in solution or dispersed in organic solvents or water. Organic solvents, however, have a number of known disadvantages: evaporation after application of the coating causes pollution problems and in some cases toxicity problems; further, they are generally only slightly biodegradable, and so have an additional negative environmental effect; they are relatively expensive; they are flammable, etc.
Currently, then, aqueous emulsions are preferred and usually comprise water, a corrosion inhibitor, a temporary or permanent surfactant or emulsifier, a co-solvent and a wax and/or polymeric film generator. Within the context of the present description, the term "temporary" denotes a compound which acts as a surfactant in the emulsion from which the protective coating or film is to be prepared, then loses its surfactant properties after application of the coating to the surface to be treated, for example by means of a chemical reaction as the coating dries. In contrast, the term "permanent" denotes a compound which retains its surfactant properties after application of the coating to the surface to be treated and drying.
Aqueous emulsions have been disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,479,981 from Ashland Oil, Inc., which uses an overbased organic sulfonate as the corrosion inhibitor and a sulfonate or an amide alkanol or an amine salt of a carboxylic acid as the surfactant. The same types of surfactant are used in the coating composition disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,647,309 from Ashland Oil, Inc., which composition also contains carbon black. U.S. Pat. No. 4,395,286 from Cincinnati-Vulcan Company uses an amine salt (ammonium salts are excluded) or a monovalent metal salt of a sulfonic acid as the surfactant.
The disadvantage of these above-noted emulsions is that they use permanent surfactants which render the film formed from them sensitive to water. The performance of the corrosion-protective coating in corrosion tests such as the salt spray test is thus only mediocre.
The aim of the present invention is thus to overcome the disadvantages of the prior art by providing a novel composition in the form of an aqueous emulsion comprising a temporary surfactant, the composition being for the protection of a metal surface against corrosion, in particular for use as a coating composition which is directly applicable to the surface and as an additive in a paint for application to the surface. It should, however, be obvious that these applications of the composition of the invention are not limiting and that it can be used, for example, as an additive in an anticorrosive primer.
The composition of the invention comprises, as an emulsion in water:
a) at least one overbased compound which is a water-insoluble salt, wherein the overbased compound has a neutralization number of more than 40; and
b) at least one surfactant constituted by an ammonium salt of an organic acid.
Optionally, the composition can also contain a co-solvent.
The aqueous composition of the invention generally contains 40% to 95% water, preferably about 70% water.
Within the context of the present invention, the adjective "overbased" denotes substances which are also known to the skilled person as "complexes", "metal complexes", "metal-rich salts", etc. Overbased substances are formed from a metal and an organic compound and contain an excess of metal with respect to the stoichiometry of the reaction between the metal and the organic compound under consideration. Examples of overbased compounds which can be used in the present invention include water-insoluble salts of alkaline-earth metals, such as sulfonates, phenates and alkylphenates, salicylates and alkylsalicylates, phosphonates, thiophosphonates, naphthenates, carboxylates, etc, and mixtures thereof. The aqueous composition usually contains about 10% to about 25% by weight of overbased compound. It preferably contains about 20% of overbased compound.
The surfactant is a "temporary" surfactant in that it acts as an emulsifier when it is present in the emulsion in the form of an ammonium salt and in that during drying it decomposes to ammonia which evaporates off and to an acid which reacts with the overbased compound to form a salt which is only slightly water-soluble. The temporary surfactant can, for example, be an ammonium salt of a carboxylic acid prepared by bringing a carboxylic acid into the presence of ammonia. Suitable carboxylic acids include linear or branched-chain saturated or unsaturated mono- or polycarboxylic acids containing 6 to 30 carbon atoms, and mixtures thereof. The temporary surfactant can also be an ammonium salt of a sulfonic acid obtained by reacting a sulfonic acid with ammonia. Suitable sulfonic acids include alkylsulfonic acids, linear or branched mono-, di- or trialkyl benzenesulfonic acids containing 8 to 60 carbon atoms, mono- or polyalkyl naphthalenesulfonic acids, compounds known as "linear alkyl bottoms" obtained by sulfonation of the bottom products from the distillation of alkylbenzenes, natural sulfonic acids, and mixtures thereof. Preferred sulfonic acids include monoalkyl- and dialkylbenzenesulfonic acids where the alkyl group is linear or branched and contains 8 to 60 carbon atoms, in particular monoalkylbenzenesulfonic acids in which the alkyl group contains an average of 24 carbon atoms. The temporary surfactant used in the present invention can also be an ammonium salt of one of the following acids: alkylphosphoric or alkylarylphosphoric acids, alkylphosphonic or alkylarylphosphonic acids, rosin acids and naphthenic acids. Finally, the surfactant of the invention may be a mixture of several of the compounds described above. The surfactant constitutes about 5% to about 15% of the total weight of the aqueous composition, preferably about 10% of the total composition weight.
The co-solvent, which stabilizes and liquefies the emulsion, prevents the inclusion of water in the film during drying by forming an azeotrope with water and facilitates the formation of a regular coating film, is generally selected from the following compounds: alkylethers of mono- or dialkyleneglycols or esters thereof, ether-alcohol esters and alcohols containing 3 to 12 carbon atoms. The co-solvent is preferably an alkylether of a dialkyleneglycol. The co-solvent constitutes 0% to 20% of the total weight of the aqueous composition, preferably 5% to 10% of the total composition weight.
The aqueous composition of the invention, in particular when it is used as a coating composition, can also contain at least one of the following compounds:
an anti-foaming agent to facilitate formation and application of a bubble-free film;
a biocidal preservative to prevent micro-organisms from attacking the emulsion constituents;
a filler to increase the strength of the film;
an anticorrosion pigment or a conventional pigment;
a specific anticorrosion agent to prevent the appearance of rust while the film is drying after its application to the surface to be treated;
an emulsified polymer or wax to increase film hardness, etc.
When it is used as a coating composition, the composition described above can be applied using any means known to the skilled person. As an example, the coating can be applied by dipping, brushing, spraying, die coating, roller coating, etc. The metal surfaces to be coated can, for example, be constituted by iron, aluminum, copper, zinc, etc, and alloys thereof.
When used as an anticorrosion additive in a paint, for example an acrylic type paint or a "polyester" type paint, the composition of the invention is advantageously added in a quantity of about 0.5% to about 25%, preferably in the order of 1%.
The following example illustrates a preferred method of preparing one example of a composition according to the invention, which was tested as a coating composition and as an anticorrosion additive for paint.
Preparation of the emulsion
350 g of deionized water and 60 g of the butyl ether of ethyleneglycol were introduced into a 1 liter beaker. 42 g of a benzenesulfonic acid with a substituent containing 24 carbon atoms was dispersed at ambient temperature with agitation, using apparatus such as an Ultra Turrax available from JANKE & KUNKEL, Staufen, Germany. About 7 g of 25% ammonia was then added. The solution obtained was clear and had a pH on the order of 8.5.
The solution was heated to about 60°C, avoiding loss of ammonia. 141 g of ARCOT 785 (formerly known as ARCOT 800) which had been melted at about 90°C was slowly poured into the solution with vigorous shearing agitation. ARCOT 785 is a complexed compound derived from an overbased calcium carboxylate with a basic neutralization number on the order of 130 mg of KOH/g, available from P.C.A.S., Longjumeau, France. The resulting solution was cooled with agitation and stored at a temperature of about 30°C
The composition was a fluid, homogeneous liquid which was brown in color and of low odor, with no perceptible odor of ammonia. The composition had a pH of 7.8. The composition (emulsion) was homogeneous at the end of its manufacture, after 24 hours and after one month. No drop-out, i.e. separation of the constituents, was observed. The Brookfield viscosity of the composition was measured at 23°C The Brookfield viscosity was 4.250, 2.750, 1.700 and 1.200 cPs at rates of 2, 4, 10 and 20 respectively: the composition was thus fluid. The theoretical dry extract was 30%, measured after being in an oven at 105°C for 18 hours. The dry extract was tacky and its fat edge formation temperature was over 100°C
All the compositions shown in Tables 1, 2 and 3 were prepared in similar fashion to the above composition which is identified by the reference number 18.
A. Use of the emulsion as a coating composition
A film of the above composition (emulsion) was applied manually to a steel test piece edged with wax. Flash rusting on the film was evaluated visually by observing the surface and the density of any spots of corrosion after 24 hours of drying: no rust spots were visible on the film. A 180° bending test was also carried out on a test piece coated with a 100 micron film of the above composition, after cooling the test piece for one hour at -30°C This test produced satisfactory results. Finally, the film was salt spray tested in accordance with standard NFX 41002. The number of hours of resistance in this test without significant formation of rust was measured, along with the film thickness after 72 hours of drying, to determine the resistance/thickness ratio. The results are given in Table 4.
Table 5 compares the results obtained in the salt spray test using composition 18 above and prior art anticorrosion compositions.
The composition tested thus had a much better salt spray resistance than the prior art compositions.
Identical tests were carried out on compositions 1 to 18 of Tables 1, 2 and 3. The results of these tests are shown in the tables.
Various coating compositions obtained using the teaching of the present invention were tested and compared.
Comparative example 1: Temporary surfactant
Six compositions of the present invention were tested, each comprising 20% by weight of ARCOT 645, an overbased sulfonic acid with a basic neutralization number of 170 mg KOH/g available from P.C.A.S., Longjumeau, France, 10% by weight of a temporary surfactant, 5% by weight of the (mono)butyl ether of diethyleneglycol and about 65% by weight of deionized water.
The surfactants used were respectively the ammonium salts of the following compounds:
Composition No 1: a benzenesulfonic acid with an alkyl substituent containing 24 carbon atoms.
Composition No 2: a carboxylic acid containing 8 carbon atoms.
Composition No 3: a carboxylic acid containing 18 carbon atoms.
Composition No 4: a benzenesulfonic acid with a substituent containing 19 carbon atoms.
Composition No 5: a benzenesulfonic acid with two substituents each containing 11 carbon atoms.
Composition No 6: a benzenesulfonic acid with a substituent containing 12 carbon atoms.
The results are shown in Table 1.
Comparative example 2: Temporary surfactant
The above tests were repeated, replacing ARCOT 645 with ARCOT 785.
Resulting compositions 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 corresponded to compositions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 respectively.
The results are shown in Table 2.
The principal parameters of the tested coating compositions were extracted from Tables 1 and 2, namely: emulsifier quality, flash rusting on drying, salt spray resistance. Each parameter was then classified into one of the following categories: very good, good, medium, poor, very poor. The quality of the emulsifier was then determined by visual evaluation of the homogeneity of the emulsions prepared over a period of time of up to one month. The emulsifier was deemed to be very good when the emulsions were homogeneous, medium when they became heterogeneous, poor when the observed drop-out was about 5%, and very poor at higher degrees of drop-out.
The results are shown in Table 6.
Comparative example 3: Filler and co-solvent
In Table 3, composition 15 contained 25% of talc. Compositions 16, 17 and 18 contained different proportions of co-solvent.
B. Use of the emulsion as an anticorrosion additive for paint
Table 7 illustrates a comparative test in which different characteristics of two acrylic paint compositions were evaluated, in particular the salt spray resistance. Composition 1 contained components conventionally used in such paints, The only difference between composition 1 and composition 2 was that composition 2 also contained 5.5% of an additive of the invention, corresponding to composition No 18 of Table 3.
Table 7 shows that the additive of the invention conferred excellent anticorrosion properties on the tested paint.
A further test was carried out using a "polyester" type paint to which 1% of a composition of the invention had been added. This composition was identical to composition No 18 of Table 3 except that the oil was removed from the ARCOT 785.
This test showed that after curing, the paint composition obtained had a salt spray resistance, determined in accordance with the standard cited above, of more than 500 hours.
| TABLE 1 |
| __________________________________________________________________________ |
| Composition No |
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 |
| __________________________________________________________________________ |
| ARCOT 645 20 20 20 20 20 20 |
| Sulfonic acid C24/NH4+ |
| 10 |
| Carboxylic acid C8/NH4+ |
| 10 |
| Carboxylic acid C18/NH4+ |
| 10 |
| Sulfonic acid C19/NH4+ 10 |
| Sulfonic acid 2 × C11/NH4+ |
| 10 |
| Sulfonic acid C12/NH4+ 10 |
| Deionized water |
| 65 65 65 65 65 65 |
| Diethyleneglycol butylether |
| 5 5 5 5 5 5 |
| TOTAL 100 100 100 100 100 100 |
| Appearance, end of manufacture |
| homogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| Appearance, 24 h |
| homogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| heterogeneous |
| 10% dropout |
| Color beige white white beige |
| brown beuge |
| beige white beige |
| Viscosity, 24 h |
| thick liquid solid very thick |
| thick liquid |
| Appearance, emulsion, 1 month |
| ∼homogeneous |
| ∼homogeneous |
| 5% droupout |
| ∼homogeneous |
| eliminated |
| 50% dropout |
| % theoretical dry extract |
| approx. 30% |
| approx. 30% |
| approx. 30% |
| approx. 30% |
| approx. 30% |
| approx. 30% |
| Tackiness oily oily+ greasy oily oily oily |
| Flash rusting (24 h) |
| medium 1 spot 0% slight high not tested |
| Test No 1, salt spray |
| Thickness (μm) |
| 17.5 23.5 30 28 not tested |
| 25.5 |
| Resistance (h) |
| 170 140 10 150 not tested |
| 8 |
| Resistance/thickness ratio (h/μm) |
| 10 6 0 5 not tested |
| 0 |
| Test No 2, salt spray |
| Thickness (μm) |
| 14 13 not tested |
| 26 not tested |
| 31 |
| Resistance (h) |
| 140 100 not tested |
| 140 nit tested |
| 8 |
| Resistance/thickness ratio (h/μm) |
| 10 8 not tested |
| 5 not tested |
| 0 |
| __________________________________________________________________________ |
| TABLE 2 |
| __________________________________________________________________________ |
| Composition No |
| 7 8 9 10 11 |
| __________________________________________________________________________ |
| ARCOT 785 20 20 20 20 20 |
| Sulfonic acid C24/NH4 + |
| 10 |
| Carboxylic acid C8/NH4 + |
| 10 |
| Carboxylic acid C18/NH4 + |
| Sulfonic acid C19/NH4 + |
| 10 |
| Sulfonic acid 2 × C11/NH4 + |
| 10 |
| Sulfonic acid C12/NH4 + 10 |
| Deionized water |
| 65 65 65 65 65 |
| Diethyleneglycol butylether |
| 5 5 5 5 5 |
| TOTAL 100 100 100 100 100 |
| Appearance, end of manufacture |
| homogeneous |
| heterogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| heterogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| Appearance, 24 h |
| homogeneous |
| heterogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| heterogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| Color brown beige |
| eliminated |
| dark brown |
| eliminated |
| light brown |
| Viscosity, 24 h |
| medium eliminated |
| medium eliminated |
| medium |
| Appearance, emulsion, 1 month |
| homogeneous |
| eliminated |
| homogeneous |
| eliminated |
| 5% dropout |
| % theoretical dry extract |
| approx. 30% |
| approx. 30% |
| approx. 30% |
| approx. 30% |
| approx. 30% |
| Tackiness tacky greasy greasy - |
| oily greasy |
| Flash rusting (24 h) |
| 0% not tested |
| medium not tested |
| 0% |
| Test No, salt spray |
| Thickness (μm) |
| 13.5 not tested |
| 27.5 not tested |
| 18 |
| Resistance (h) |
| 250 not tested |
| 900 not tested |
| 8 |
| Resistanc/thickness ratio (h/μm) |
| 19 not tested |
| 33 not tested |
| 0 |
| Test No 2, salt spray |
| Thickness (μm) |
| 33 not tested |
| 30 not tested |
| 32.5 |
| Resistance (h) |
| 800 not tested |
| 850 not tested |
| 8 |
| Resistance/thickness ratio (h/μm) |
| 24 not tested |
| 28 not tested |
| 0 |
| __________________________________________________________________________ |
| TABLE 3 |
| __________________________________________________________________________ |
| Composition No |
| 13 14 15 16 17 18 |
| __________________________________________________________________________ |
| ARCOT 785 20 16 10.5 23.5 23.5 23.5 |
| Sulfonic acid C24/NH4+ |
| 15 10 7.5 7.5 7.5 |
| Sodium sulfonate |
| 10 |
| Talc 25 |
| Deionized water |
| 65 62 47.5 64 62 59 |
| Diethyleneglycol butylether |
| 5 7 7 5 7 10 |
| TOTAL 100 100 100 100 100 100 |
| Appearance, end of manufacture |
| homogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| Appearance, 24 h |
| homogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| Color brown dark brown |
| beige brown |
| brown brown brown |
| Viscosity, 24 h |
| liquid liquid liquid solid thick liquid |
| Appearance, emulsion, 1 month |
| ∼heterogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| 10% dropout |
| eliminated |
| ∼homogeneous |
| homogeneous |
| % theoretical dry extract |
| approx. 30% |
| approx. 30% |
| approx. 45% |
| eliminated |
| approx. 30% |
| approx. 30% |
| Tackiness oily tacky ∼dry |
| eliminated |
| eliminated |
| tacky |
| Flash rusting (24 h) |
| 1% 0% 0% eliminated |
| 0% 0% |
| Test No 1, salt spray |
| Thickness (μm) |
| 43.5 54 32.5 eliminated |
| not tested |
| 9 |
| Resistance (h) |
| 250 >1000 1000 eliminated |
| not tested |
| 240 |
| Resistance/thickness ratio (h/μm) |
| 6 >20 31 eliminated |
| not tested |
| 27 |
| Test No 2, salt spray |
| Thickness (μm) |
| 22 not tested |
| not tested |
| eliminated |
| not tested |
| 20 |
| Resistance (h) |
| 200 not tested |
| not tested |
| eliminated |
| not tested |
| 1000 |
| Resistance/thickness ratio (h/μm) |
| 9 not tested |
| not tested |
| eliminated |
| not tested |
| 50 |
| __________________________________________________________________________ |
| TABLE 4 |
| ______________________________________ |
| Salt spray Resistance/ |
| resistance Thickness |
| thickness ratio |
| ______________________________________ |
| approx. 240 hours |
| 9 μm approx. 27 h/μm |
| approx. 1 000 hours |
| 20 μm approx. 50 h/μm |
| approx. 1 500 hours |
| 30 μm approx. 50 h/μm |
| ______________________________________ |
| TABLE 5 |
| ______________________________________ |
| Salt spray Resistance/ |
| Composition resistance Thickness |
| thickness ratio |
| ______________________________________ |
| 18 (Table 3) |
| 1 500 h 30 μm 50 h/μm |
| US-A-4 851 043 |
| 360 h -- -- |
| US-A-4 479 981 |
| 1 000 h 76 μm 13 h/μm |
| US-A-4 444 802 |
| 400 h 48 μm 8 h/μm |
| 13 (Table 3) |
| 200 h 22 μm 9 h/μm |
| ______________________________________ |
| TABLE 6 |
| ______________________________________ |
| Rust prevention |
| Salt spray |
| Compositions |
| Emulsifier on drying resistance |
| ______________________________________ |
| 1 and 7 Good Good Very good |
| 2 and 8 Medium Good Good |
| 3 Poor Good Very poor |
| 4 and 9 Very good Poor Good |
| 5 and 10 Poor Poor Not tested |
| 6 and 11 Poor Good Very poor |
| ______________________________________ |
| TABLE 7 |
| ______________________________________ |
| 1 2 |
| ______________________________________ |
| Composition |
| Acrylic emulsion A |
| 12.7% 12.7% |
| Titanium oxide 4.4% 4.4% |
| Talc 4.6% 4.6% |
| Anticorrosion pigment |
| 7.3% 7.3% |
| Antifoaming agent 0.2% 0.2% |
| Acrylic emulsion B |
| 49.5% 49.5% |
| Co-solvent A 1.7% 1.7% |
| Co-solvent B 4.5% 4.5% |
| Antirust agent 0.15% 0.15% |
| Spreading agent 0.5% 0.5% |
| Example 18 0 5.5% |
| 20.5 wt % NH4 OH |
| 0.6% 0.6% |
| Water 13.85% 8.35% |
| Characteristics |
| Dry extract 41.0 wt % |
| 41.0 wt % |
| pH 8.2 8.2 |
| Viscosity 250 cps 250 cps |
| Pencil hardness H HB |
| (ASTM D 3363)1 |
| Adhesion, % eliminated |
| 0% 0% |
| (ASTM D 3359) |
| Konig pendulum 69 s/cycle |
| 69 s/cycle |
| (ASTM D 4366) |
| Salt spray |
| (ASTM B 117) |
| 75 h |
| blistering2 2 F 0 |
| penetration >5 mm 0 mm |
| 250 h |
| blistering 6 MD 0 |
| penetration >10 mm >5 mm |
| ______________________________________ |
| 1 B = rather soft |
| HB = rather hard |
| 2 Grading in ASTM D 714 |
| Blister diameter: 2 = approx. 6 mm; 4 = approx. 3 mm; 6 = approx. 2 mm; 8 |
| = approx. 1 mm |
| Blister density: F = low; M = medium; MD = high; D = very high |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 10669433, | Nov 09 2015 | The Lubrizol Corporation | Using quaternary amine additives to improve water separation |
| 11225580, | Nov 09 2015 | The Lubrizol Corporation | Using quaternary amine additives to improve water separation |
| 6149794, | Jan 31 1997 | BANK OF AMERICA, N A , AS SUCCESSOR AGENT | Method for cathodically treating an electrically conductive zinc surface |
| 6153080, | Jan 31 1997 | BANK OF AMERICA, N A , AS SUCCESSOR AGENT | Electrolytic process for forming a mineral |
| 6258243, | Jan 31 1997 | BANK OF AMERICA, N A , AS SUCCESSOR AGENT | Cathodic process for treating an electrically conductive surface |
| 6572756, | Jan 31 1997 | BANK OF AMERICA, N A , AS SUCCESSOR AGENT | Aqueous electrolytic medium |
| 6592738, | Jan 31 1997 | BANK OF AMERICA, N A , AS SUCCESSOR AGENT | Electrolytic process for treating a conductive surface and products formed thereby |
| 6596393, | Apr 20 2000 | COMMSCOPE, INC OF NORTH CAROLINA | Corrosion-protected coaxial cable, method of making same and corrosion-inhibiting composition |
| 6599643, | Jan 31 1997 | BANK OF AMERICA, N A , AS SUCCESSOR AGENT | Energy enhanced process for treating a conductive surface and products formed thereby |
| 6866896, | Feb 05 2002 | BANK OF AMERICA, N A , AS SUCCESSOR AGENT | Method for treating metallic surfaces and products formed thereby |
| 6994779, | Jan 31 1997 | BANK OF AMERICA, N A , AS SUCCESSOR AGENT | Energy enhanced process for treating a conductive surface and products formed thereby |
| 6997999, | Apr 20 2000 | COMMSCOPE, INC OF NORTH CAROLINA | Method of making corrosion-protected coaxial cable |
| 7220297, | Jun 04 2001 | PIGMENTAN LTD | Anti-corrosive pigments and method for making the same |
| 8394208, | Feb 24 2003 | BASF Aktiengesellschaft | Carboxylate-containing polymers for metal surface treatment |
| 8580154, | Dec 09 2004 | Lonza, Inc. | Quaternary ammonium salts as a conversion coating or coating enhancement |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 4343660, | Apr 07 1978 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Corrosion inhibiting system |
| 4395286, | Jun 30 1982 | The Cincinnati-Vulcan Company | Water-based coating oil |
| 4444802, | May 03 1982 | Ashland Oil, Inc. | Water-borne firm coating compositions and processes therefor |
| 4479981, | May 03 1982 | Ashland Oil, Inc. | Water-borne hard coating compositions and processes therefor |
| 4495225, | Mar 21 1984 | Ashland Inc | Method and composition for the prevention or inhibition of corrosion |
| 4582543, | Jul 26 1984 | The Lubrizol Corporation; LUBRIZOL CORPORATION, THE, 29400 LAKELAND BOULEVARD WICKLIFFE, OHIO 44092 A CORP OF OHIO | Water-based metal-containing organic phosphate compositions |
| 4615813, | Jul 26 1984 | The Lubrizol Corporation | Water-based metal-containing organic phosphate compositions |
| 4631083, | Jun 17 1985 | M & B ASSET MANAGEMENT, LTD | Pipe varnish compositions and use thereof |
| 4647309, | Mar 07 1985 | Ashland Oil, Inc. | Waterborne firm coating for temporary protection of parts, providing controlled lubrication during assembly |
| 4718942, | Aug 08 1985 | M & B ASSET MANAGEMENT, LTD | Thixotropic overbased alkaline earth metal inorganic-organic compositions containing alkoxylated oxidized petrolatums |
| 4729791, | Feb 25 1985 | M & B ASSET MANAGEMENT, LTD | Corrosion-inhibiting coating compositions for metals |
| 4749412, | Sep 27 1985 | ASHLAND INC A KENTUCKY CORPORATION | Method and composition for the inhibition of corrosion |
| 4851043, | Nov 24 1987 | Ashland Oil, Inc. | Water reducible soft coating compositions |
| 5037877, | Oct 22 1987 | Produits Chimiques Auxiliaires et de Synthese (P.C.A.S.) | Polymer based preparation for the surface protection of zinc against white rust |
| 5045361, | Oct 22 1987 | PRODUITS CHIMIQUES AUXILIARES ET DE SYNTHESE P C A S , A CORP OF FRANCE | Process of preparation for the surface protection of zinc against white rust |
| 5338347, | Sep 11 1992 | The Lubrizol Corporation | Corrosion inhibition composition |
| 5407471, | Sep 11 1992 | The Lubrizol Corporation | Corrosion inhibition composition |
| 5455075, | Mar 10 1994 | Daubert Chemical Company, Inc. | Hot melt corrosion inhibiting coating composition |
| EP93323, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Aug 27 1996 | KERHERVE, JEAN-PIERRE | PRODUITS CHIMIQUES AUXILIAIRES ET DE SYNTHESE P C A S | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 008203 | /0388 | |
| Sep 06 1996 | Produtis Chimiques Auxiliares et de Synthese (P.C.A.S.) | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Nov 06 1998 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
| Mar 18 1999 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
| Mar 18 1999 | RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned. |
| Mar 21 2001 | M283: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
| Oct 28 2005 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
| Nov 30 2005 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Oct 28 2000 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 28 2001 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 28 2001 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Oct 28 2003 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Oct 28 2004 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 28 2005 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 28 2005 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Oct 28 2007 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Oct 28 2008 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 28 2009 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 28 2009 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Oct 28 2011 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |