A system and method for applying radiation therapy include utilizing a radiation applicator that is spaced apart from and mechanically independent of a radiation source. An array of targets is affixed to the radiation applicator and cameras image the targets to determine coordinates that are compared to desired target coordinates. If there is a correlation between actual target coordinates and desired coordinates, radiation source-to-applicator alignment is achieved. Consequently, the patient is properly positioned relative to a radiation beam, such as an electron beam. On the other hand, if the actual and desired coordinates are different, the relative position of the radiation source and the gantry is adjusted. Preferably, the adjustment is automated.

Patent
   5745545
Priority
Aug 16 1996
Filed
Aug 16 1996
Issued
Apr 28 1998
Expiry
Aug 16 2016
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
141
7
all paid
1. A system for applying radiation therapy comprising:
a radiation source for emitting a radiation beam having a beam axis;
an applicator spaced apart from said radiation source, said applicator being mechanically independent of said radiation source, said applicator having a beam inlet end and a beam outlet end;
a plurality of targets affixed to said applicator in a single configuration which enables said applicator to be used on a plurality of patients;
imaging means affixed to said radiation source for forming image data representative of said targets; and
position means for determining positions of said targets based upon said image data.
10. A method of localizing radiation for application to a plurality of patients comprising steps of:
(a) providing an applicator having an array of fixed-position targets;
(b) attaching an applicator such that said applicator has an orientation that is substantially fixed relative to a patient;
(c) supporting a radiation source adjacent to said applicator;
(d) imaging said targets on said applicator to determine a first alignment of said radiation source and said applicator;
(e) determining whether said first alignment is a desired source-to-applicator alignment for applying radiation to said patient;
(f) if said first alignment does not match said desired source-to-applicator alignment, adjusting the relative positioning of said radiation source and applicator and repeating steps (d) and (e);
(g) when said desired source-to-applicator alignment is achieved, executing a therapy session that includes generating a radiation beam to enter said applicator;
(h) repeating steps (b) through (g) for a different patient utilizing said applicator.
15. A system for applying localized therapeutic radiation comprising:
a displaceable gantry having a collimator for directing a radiation beam along a beam axis;
a displaceable patient table mechanically independent of said gantry for supporting a patient to receive radiation therapy;
an applicator supported by said patient table for directing said radiation beam to said patient, said applicator having targets attached to said applicator in fixed positions for use with a plurality of patients;
imaging means supported by said gantry for forming image signals indicative of said targets;
means for determining positions of said targets in three dimensions based upon said image signals;
memory having stored position data indicative of predetermined desired positions of said targets for radiation therapy sessions of a plurality of patients; and
means, responsive to selection of a particular patient from said plurality of patients, and responsive to said means for determining said positions of said targets, for aligning said radiation beam and said applicator based upon stored position data specific to said particular patient.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein said imaging means includes a plurality of cameras directed at said applicator.
3. The system of claim 1 further comprising automated means for adjusting an alignment of said beam axis and said applicator based upon positions of said targets as determined by said position means.
4. The system of claim 1 wherein said position means has an output indicative of said positions of said targets in three dimensions.
5. The system of claim 1 further comprising a patient table for supporting a medical patient, said applicator being fixed to said patient table.
6. The system of claim 5 wherein said radiation source and said patient table are independently displaceable.
7. The system of claim 1 further comprising a laser light source directed to illuminate said targets.
8. The system of claim 7 wherein said targets have retroreflective material exposed to said laser light source.
9. The system of claim 1 further comprising memory means for storing desired positions of said targets relative to said imaging means, said system further comprising means for comparing said stored desired positions to said target positions determined by said position means.
11. The method of claim 10 further comprising a step of determining positions of said targets in three dimensions.
12. The method of claim 10 wherein said step (b) of attaching said applicator is a step of fixing said applicator to direct radiation through an incision in said patient.
13. The method of claim 10 wherein said step (f) of adjusting said relative positioning includes at least one of repositioning a gantry and repositioning a patient table on which said patient is supported.
14. The method of claim 13 wherein step (f) is an automated step of repositioning at least one of said gantry and said patient table.
16. The system of claim 15 further comprising means for automatically varying at least one of said gantry and said patient table.
17. The system of claim 15 wherein said targets include retroreflective material.
18. The system of claim 15 wherein said imaging means includes a plurality of cameras and light sources.
19. The system of claim 18 wherein said imaging means further includes an infrared filter for each camera, said light sources being infrared lasers.

The invention relates generally to aligning elements for applying radiation to a patient and more particularly to systems and methods for properly aligning a source of radiation with an applicator for intra-operative radiation therapy.

Radiation-emitting devices are generally known and used, for instance, as radiation therapy devices for the treatment of patients. A radiation therapy device typically includes a gantry which can be swiveled about a horizontal axis of rotation in the course of a therapeutic session. A linear accelerator is located in the gantry for generating a high-energy radiation beam. The high-radiation beam can be electron radiation or photon (X-ray) radiation. During treatment, the radiation beam is trained on a treatment site of a patient lying in the isocenter of the gantry rotation. Typically, the patient is supported on a rotatable table. The combination of movements of the gantry and the table permits movement of the patient about mutually perpendicular X, Y and Z axes. These rotations are sometimes referred to by the terms "tilt," "roll" and "yaw," respectively.

Prior to the application of radiation, a treatment setup process is followed. This process includes setting beam parameters such as radiation energy, field size, exposure times, dose and distance. Moreover, the process includes aligning the gantry, a collimator and the patient. The radiation beam is directed at diseased material, but with a goal of minimizing any adverse effect upon adjacent healthy tissue.

For intra-operative treatments, the alignment process also includes aligning an applicator relative to the patient and the source of radiation. Intra-operative treatment typically includes forming an incision through which an electron beam is directed to a treatment site. The applicator is both mechanically and electrically isolated from the source, i.e. the gantry. Mechanical independence is desirable, since the mass of the gantry operates against the ability to manipulate the radiation beam to enter a relatively small operative incision without significant risk to the patient. The applicator is fixed relative to the patient, typically by attachment to the table. The applicator provides beam collimation close to the patient by establishing a radiation field-defining aperture. Thus, the mechanical isolation reliably limits exposure to the desired treatment site.

Electrical isolation is a factor, since any leakage currents from the gantry to the patient place the patient at risk. U.S. Pat. No. 4,638,814 to Spanswick, which is assigned to the assignee of the present invention, asserts that a patient cannot be subjected to ground leakage currents which exceed five micro amperes because blood and body fluids are good electrolytes and because any electrical devices that are in contact with the patient may be disturbed. Spanswick describes a method of aligning an electron applicator with an electron beam source. A number of laser units project beams of light toward a support ring of the electron applicator. The beams are arranged in a mutual orientation, such as four laser units arranged at 90° intervals. Each of the four laser units includes a beam splitter, so that eight beams are formed. The eight beams form four beam pairs, with the two beams of a pair overlapping at a predetermined point from the electron beam source. Consequently, when the support ring is along the plane through the points of intersection, the eight beams form only four areas of illumination. The electron applicator is attached to the operating table, so that the operating table is moved until there are only the four illuminated regions. In addition to aligning the electron applicator and the electron beam source, the use of the intersecting beams determines the spacing between the applicator and the source.

While the system described in Spanswick provided an improvement over the prior art, further improvements are available. Since the positioning of the electron applicator based upon overlapping beams is performed visually, the process is subject to human error. Moreover, the patent points out that the beams must be "exceedingly sharp" in order to achieve precise positioning. As a result, the accuracy of the method depends upon the selection of the sources of the light beams. Another concern relates to the ability to change the spacing between the electron applicator and the electron beam source. This spacing will partially determine the intensity of the electron beam at the treatment site of the patient. If the intersection of beams is to be used to determine the spacing between the electron applicator and the electron beam source, the light beam axes must be adjusted from session to session when the electron beam intensities vary among sessions. This increases the setup time for equipment which is in demand.

What is needed is a system and method for accurately and efficiently positioning a beam applicator without requiring the beam applicator to be connected to a source of the beam.

A system for applying radiation therapy includes a radiation source that emits a radiation beam into an applicator that is spaced apart from and mechanically independent of the radiation source. An array of targets is affixed to the applicator and at least one imaging device is affixed to the radiation source to form image data representative of the targets. The image data is processed to determine the positions of the targets. In one embodiment, the determination of the target positions is used to automatically adjust either the applicator positioning or the radiation source positioning until the target positions match predefined coordinates. Preferably, the target positioning is determined in three dimensions.

A method of applying the therapeutic radiation includes attaching the applicator so that it has an orientation that is substantially fixed relative to a patient. The applicator is imaged by the imaging devices that are affixed to the radiation source. Based upon the image data, the system determines whether a desired source-to-applicator alignment has been achieved. The relative positioning of the radiation source and the applicator is adjusted until the desired source-to-applicator alignment is achieved. A radiation beam is then directed into the applicator for applying localized radiation to a treatment site. In the preferred embodiment, the method is used for intra-operative radiation therapy.

FIG. 1 is a schematical view of a system for applying localized radiation for intra-operative radiation therapy in accordance with the prior art.

FIG. 2 is a schematical view of a system of applying localized radiation in accordance with the invention.

FIG. 3 is a top view of a radiation applicator having targets in accordance with the invention.

FIG. 4 is a process flow view of a method for utilizing the system of FIG. 2.

FIG. 5 is a front view of a display screen for the applicator of FIG. 3.

With reference to FIG. 1, a patient 10 is shown as resting on a table 12 under a gantry 14 of a radiation therapy machine. A radiation beam is directed from a collimator 16 of the gantry toward the patient. The radiation beam is generated by a linear accelerator within the gantry and is emitted from the collimator. The radiation beam may be electron radiation or photon radiation, i.e. X-ray radiation. The gantry is known in the art.

Typically, the collimator 16 determines the final beam geometry. The beam is directed at a treatment site, such as diseased brain tissue of the patient 10. The table 12 and the gantry 14 are maneuvered to provide the desired alignment of the patient 10 to the radiation beam, and the beam is then generated. However, there are circumstances in which it is undesirable to use the collimator 16 as the component for final direction of the radiation beam at the patient. For example, within an intra-operative treatment an incision is formed for passage of an electron beam to a treatment site. An electron beam tends to expand more quickly than an X-ray beam, so that there is greater concern that healthy tissue will be exposed. To reduce the risk, a radiation applicator 18 is utilized. The radiation applicator is spaced apart from the collimator 16 and may have an output end inserted into the incision of the patient 10. The radiation applicator is formed of a material that is opaque to the electron beam, but includes a passageway to the treatment site. The radiation applicator localizes the therapy to the desired treatment site.

Referring now to FIGS. 2 and 3, a radiation applicator 20 in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention is shown as including four targets 22, 24, 26 and 28. The targets may be recesses within the surface of the applicator, but preferably are separate members that are formed of a material that facilitates imaging of the targets. As will be explained more fully below, the targets are imaged in order to calculate the spacing and the alignment of the radiation applicator relative to a collimator 30 of the gantry 32 shown in FIG. 2.

While not critical, the targets 22, 24, 26 and 28 are preferably fabricated in the manner described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,446,548 to Gerig et al., which is assigned to the assignee of the present invention. The Gerig et al. patent describes a patient positioning and monitoring system that can be utilized in combination with the invention to be described below.

The targets 22, 24, 26 and 28 preferably include retroreflective material. The arrangement of the targets on the surface of the applicator 20 is not critical. The targets are imaged by a pair of cameras 34 and 36. The cameras may be charge coupled device (CCD) cameras, but other imaging devices may be utilized. The image signals from the cameras 34 and 36 are input to an image processing circuit 38. The image processing circuit cooperates with a position calculation circuit 40 to determine position data for the radiation applicator 20. The image and position processing may include a visual-based coordinate measurement (VCM) system to determine target positioning in three-dimensional space. In the preferred embodiment, the VCM system is a software package which can be integrated with commercially available solid-state cameras, image acquisition and processing boards, and computer hardware. The VCM system combines principles of stereo vision, photogrammetry and knowledge-based techniques to provide precise coordinate and dimension measurement of objects. The two cameras 34 and 36 and the three-dimensional image and position processing of circuits 38 and 40 are calibrated such that the frame of reference is coincident with the system, with an isocenter defined as 0,0,0. The coordinate system is defined such that the X axis lies on a horizontal plane perpendicular to a gantry axis 42 of rotation and passes through the system isocenter, the Y axis is parallel to the gantry axis of rotation and passes through the isocenter, and the Z axis is mutually perpendicular to the other two axes and defines patient height.

Light sources 44 and 46 may be used to enhance performance of the target imaging. In the preferred embodiment, the light sources provide infrared radiation, and each of the cameras 34 and 36 includes an infrared filter. The infrared radiation enables the system to more reliably distinguish light reflected from the targets 22-28, as opposed to background radiation that may be present in the therapy room under ambient light conditions. The light sources may be infrared lasers, with the infrared radiation being spread by lenses, not shown. The use of laser light sources provides the advantage that the spectral bandwidth of the radiation is narrow, providing a further reduction in background interference. Equipping the cameras 34 and 36 with infrared filters reduces the susceptibility of the cameras to background radiation.

The radiation applicator 20 of FIGS. 2 and 3 is shown as being attached to a displaceable table 48 by an L-shaped support device 50. The mechanism for suspending the radiation applicator is not critical. In fact, the applicator may be fixed to the patient, rather than to the table 48. For example, headgear may be fitted to the patient to attach the radiation applicator to the patient.

The radiation applicator 20 is shown as having a truncated cone-shaped beam outlet end 52. The configuration of the inlet and outlet ends of the applicator will depend upon the gantry 32 and the treatment plan of the patient. In the view of FIG. 3, the sloping interior surface 54 is shown as terminating in a circular outlet 56. However, other geometries are contemplated.

The determination of the positions of the targets 22-28 by the image and position processing circuitry 38 and 40 is input to a session manager 58. Based upon inputted data and/or stored data in memory 60, the session manager controls the variable components of the system. In the preferred embodiment, the session managing is completely automated. However, manual adjustments may be required. The session manager 58 may therefore include an operator console and input devices, such as a keyboard.

The session manager 58 compares the positions of the targets 22-28 to preselected coordinates. If the positions of the targets are different than the desired positions, either or both of the gantry 32 and the table 48 are manipulated to reposition the targets. The session manager is housed within a stationary portion 62 of the system that supports the rotatable portion of the gantry 32. The rotatable portion rotates about the gantry axis 42. The table 48 accommodates repositioning along the X axis and the Z axis. Preferably, the circuitry within the stationary portion 62 of the system utilizes a servo approach, so that periodic image captures via the cameras 34 and 36 are utilized to establish the desired target coordinates. Since the table 48 supports the patient, repositioning the radiation applicator 20 relative to the gantry 32 also repositions the patient. As a consequence, manipulation of the gantry 32 or the table 48 does not affect the position of the applicator 20 relative to the patient.

The operation of the system of FIG. 2 is described with reference to FIGS. 2-4. In step 64, the alignment of the applicator 20 to the patient is established. In one embodiment, the applicator-support device 50 is attached to the table 48. While not shown, the device 50 preferably includes an adjustment mechanism. For example, the device may include slide mechanisms that permit vertical and horizontal repositioning of the applicator 20. In another embodiment, the applicator 20 is supported directly by the patient.

The applicator is secured to provide the desired angular alignment relative to a treatment site of the patient. This reduces the risk that healthy tissue will be unnecessarily exposed to radiation. The alignment of the applicator also includes setting the distance between the treatment site and the beam outlet end 52 of the applicator 20.

At step 66, the cameras 34 and 36 of FIG. 2 acquire an image of the targets 22-28. Each camera detects the reflected radiation from the targets. As previously noted, the preferred embodiment includes infrared lasers 44 and 46 and infrared filters in order to reduce the effects of background radiation on the image processing at circuit 38.

At least two cameras 34 and 36 are employed in order to permit position calculation 68 in three dimensions. Stereo vision techniques of a video-based coordinate measurement system are executed within the position calculation circuit 40 to determine coordinates within a coordinate system defined such that the X axis lies in a horizontal plane perpendicular to the gantry axis 42, the Y axis is parallel to the gantry axis, and the Z axis is perpendicular to the other two axes and defines patient height. Each of the three axes of the coordinate system passes through the isocenter of the radiation system.

In step 70, a determination is made as to whether the calculated coordinates of the targets 22-28 match desired coordinates. The position data related to the desired coordinates may be stored in memory 60 of FIG. 2. The determination of whether a correlation exists preferably takes place in software. However, referring briefly to FIG. 5, the determination may be made by an operator using a display 72 that shows both the desired positions 74, 76, 78 and 80 of the targets and the actual positions 82, 84, 86 and 88. If the desired positions and the actual positions are aligned, the applicator 20 is properly aligned with the gantry 32. Consequently, the treatment site of the patient is properly aligned with the radiation beam that will be emitted from the gantry. In such case, the source of radiation can be activated, as shown at step 90 in FIG. 4. If at step 70 no correlation is determined between the coordinates calculated in step 68 and the desired target coordinates, the gantry-to applicator alignment is adjusted at step 92. The realignment may be executed in alternative manners. The stationary portion 62 of the gantry 32 may rotate the displaceable portion about gantry axis 42. Alternatively, the table may be manipulated to correct for tilt and roll. The collimator 30 of the gantry 32 is also adjustable, as is well known in the art. Of course, the gantry-to-applicator alignment may be a combination of these adjustments.

Following the realignment at step 92, the process returns to step 66 in order to acquire an updated image for calculation of updated position data in step 68. Preferably, the steps 66, 68, 70 and 92 utilize servo techniques to automatically and efficiently obtain the desired gantry-to-applicator alignment. When the alignment is achieved, the radiation therapy is initiated at step 90. The arrangement of targets 22-28 is not critical. Preferably, there are three or four targets, but performance may be enhanced in some applications by providing a different number. As previously noted, the targets may be merely recessed or raised areas of the applicator servo, but retroreflective targets enhance the image processing by reducing the effect of background radiation. Fluorescent and phosphorescent materials may also be utilized with the appropriate camera filters to enhance selectivity of reception.

In another embodiment, the targets 22-28 are fixed within the sloping interior surface 54 of the applicator 20 of FIG. 3. This allows the targets to be at different distances from the collimator 30 of FIG. 2, even when the applicator is in the desired position relative to the collimator. The variations in distance facilitate distinguishing actual positions of targets from desired target positions.

Hughes, John H.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10010720, Aug 12 2003 VISION RT LIMITED Path planning and collision avoidance for movement of instruments in a radiation therapy environment
10463339, Feb 11 2013 Nikon Metrology NV Artefact for evaluating the performance of an X-ray computed tomography system
10561860, Nov 23 2016 Imaging beam positioning apparatus and method of use thereof
11135449, May 04 2017 IntraOp Medical Corporation Machine vision alignment and positioning system for electron beam treatment systems
11806111, Dec 06 2004 Cambridge Research & Instrumentation, Inc. Systems and methods for in-vivo optical imaging and measurement
6275564, Aug 05 1998 ALAYNA ENTERPRISES CORPORATION Positioner for radiation treatment
6491702, Apr 21 1992 Sofamor Danek Holdings, Inc. Apparatus and method for photogrammetric surgical localization
6530874, Mar 29 2000 HITK ENTERPRISE CORP Synchronized moving shield for a radiation therapy apparatus
6812842, Dec 20 2001 Varian Medical Systems, Inc System for excitation of a leadless miniature marker
6822570, Dec 20 2001 Varian Medical Systems, Inc System for spatially adjustable excitation of leadless miniature marker
6838990, Dec 20 2001 Varian Medical Systems, Inc System for excitation leadless miniature marker
6907106, Aug 24 1998 Varian Medical Systems, Inc Method and apparatus for producing radioactive materials for medical treatment using x-rays produced by an electron accelerator
6918919, May 14 1998 Varian Medical Systems, Inc System and method for bracketing and removing tissue
6940941, Feb 15 2002 Medtronic Navigation, Inc Breakable gantry apparatus for multidimensional x-ray based imaging
7001045, Jun 11 2002 Medtronic Navigation, Inc Cantilevered gantry apparatus for x-ray imaging
7012391, Aug 09 2002 Seagate Technology LLC Motor acceleration using continuous sequence of current limit values
7106825, Aug 21 2002 Medtronic Navigation, Inc Apparatus and method for reconstruction of volumetric images in a divergent scanning computed tomography system
7108421, Mar 19 2002 Medtronic Navigation, Inc Systems and methods for imaging large field-of-view objects
7135978, Sep 14 2001 Varian Medical Systems, Inc Miniature resonating marker assembly
7147371, Dec 10 2004 Laser guides for X-ray device
7173265, Aug 12 2003 Loma Linda University Medical Center Modular patient support system
7176798, Dec 20 2001 Varian Medical Systems, Inc System for spatially adjustable excitation of leadless miniature marker
7188998, Mar 13 2002 Medtronic Navigation, Inc Systems and methods for quasi-simultaneous multi-planar x-ray imaging
7199382, Aug 12 2003 Loma Linda University Medical Centre Patient alignment system with external measurement and object coordination for radiation therapy system
7224472, Mar 01 2002 BrianLAB AG Operation lamp with camera system for 3D referencing
7266421, Nov 10 1998 COMMISSARIAT A L ENERGIE ATOMIQUE System for controlling lifting and remote handling units located in a confined enclosure
7280633, Aug 12 2003 Loma Linda University Medical Center Path planning and collision avoidance for movement of instruments in a radiation therapy environment
7289839, Dec 30 2002 Varian Medical Systems, Inc Implantable marker with a leadless signal transmitter compatible for use in magnetic resonance devices
7335223, Jan 30 2003 Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung Apparatus for the treatment of body tissue
7338207, Aug 21 2002 Medtronic Navigation, Inc Gantry positioning apparatus for X-ray imaging
7349730, Jan 11 2005 Radiation modulator positioner
7446328, Aug 12 2003 Loma Linda University Medical Centre Patient alignment system with external measurement and object coordination for radiation therapy system
7490982, Aug 21 2002 Medtronic Navigation, Inc Gantry positioning apparatus for x-ray imaging
7535363, Sep 14 2001 Varian Medical Systems, Inc Miniature resonating marker assembly
7587024, Sep 01 2006 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Particle beam irradiation system
7620147, Dec 13 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiotherapy
7657301, Jun 08 2001 Varian Medical Systems, Inc Guided radiation therapy system
7657302, Jun 08 2001 Varian Medical Systems, Inc Guided radiation therapy system
7657303, Jun 08 2001 Varian Medical Systems, Inc Guided radiation therapy system
7661881, Mar 19 2002 Medtronic Navigation, Inc Systems and methods for imaging large field-of-view objects
7668292, Aug 26 2008 Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. Patient setup error evaluation and error minimizing setup correction in association with radiotherapy treatment
7680244, Oct 16 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Ocular radiosurgery
7680245, Oct 16 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiotherapy
7684849, Dec 31 2003 Varian Medical Systems, Inc Marker localization sensing system synchronized with radiation source
7693258, Oct 16 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiotherapy
7693259, Oct 16 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiotherapy
7693260, Apr 09 2007 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiosurgery
7696499, Aug 12 2003 Loma Linda University Medical Center Modular patient support system
7696876, Dec 20 2001 Varian Medical Systems, Inc System for spatially adjustable excitation of leadless miniature marker
7697663, Oct 16 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiotherapy
7746978, Aug 12 2003 Loma Linda University Medical Center Path planning and collision avoidance for movement of instruments in a radiation therapy environment
7778687, Dec 30 2002 Varian Medical Systems, Inc Implantable marker with a leadless signal transmitter compatible for use in magnetic resonance devices
7789560, Oct 30 2001 Loma Linda University Medical Center Method and device for delivering radiotherapy
7789561, Feb 15 2008 SCHWADE, JAMES G, DR Laser aligned image guided radiation beam verification apparatus
7792249, Dec 23 2007 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Methods and devices for detecting, controlling, and predicting radiation delivery
7801271, Dec 23 2007 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Methods and devices for orthovoltage ocular radiotherapy and treatment planning
7802919, Oct 15 2004 MTU Aero Engines GmbH Device and method for representing the direction of action of a working means
7822175, Oct 16 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Portable orthovoltage radiotherapy
7873407, Dec 06 2004 CAMBRIDGE RESEARCH & INSTRUMENTATION, INC Systems and methods for in-vivo optical imaging and measurement
7903779, Aug 21 2002 Medtronic Navigation, Inc Apparatus and method for reconstruction of volumetric images in a divergent scanning computed tomography system
7905659, Jun 11 2002 Medtronic Navigation, Inc Cantilevered gantry apparatus for x-ray imaging
7907699, Feb 28 2006 ELEKTA AB PUBL Radiotherapeutic apparatus
7912178, Oct 16 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiotherapy
7912179, Jul 18 2007 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiosurgery
7912529, Dec 30 2002 Varian Medical Systems, Inc Panel-type sensor/source array assembly
7926491, Dec 31 2002 Varian Medical Systems, Inc Method and apparatus for sensing field strength signals to estimate location of a wireless implantable marker
7949096, Aug 12 2003 Loma Linda University Medical Center Path planning and collision avoidance for movement of instruments in a radiation therapy environment
7953203, Apr 09 2007 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiosurgery
7961845, Dec 13 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiotherapy
7965811, Aug 21 2002 Medtronic Navigation, Inc. Apparatus and method for reconstruction of volumetric images in a divergent scanning computed tomography system
7978818, Dec 13 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiotherapy
7978819, Dec 13 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiotherapy
7984715, Jun 25 2004 Loma Linda University Medical Center Method and device for registration and immobilization
8059784, Oct 16 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Portable orthovoltage radiotherapy
8073105, Oct 16 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Ocular radiosurgery
8077328, Jul 06 2009 SUN NUCLEAR CORP Variable color incoherent alignment line and cross-hair generator
8083408, Oct 30 2001 Loma Linda University Medical Center Method and device for delivering radiotherapy
8093569, Aug 12 2003 Loma Linda University Medical Centre Modular patient support system
8094779, Oct 16 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiotherapy
8180021, Oct 16 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiotherapy
8184772, Apr 09 2007 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiosurgery
8184773, Aug 12 2003 Loma Linda University Medical Center Path planning and collision avoidance for movement of instruments in a radiation therapy environment
8189739, Oct 16 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiotherapy
8196589, Dec 24 2003 Varian Medical Systems, Inc Implantable marker with wireless signal transmitter
8210899, Nov 21 2006 Loma Linda University Medical Center Device and method for immobilizing patients for breast radiation therapy
8229069, Dec 13 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiotherapy
8229073, Dec 13 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiotherapy
8238517, Dec 13 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiotherapy
8244330, Jul 23 2004 Varian Medical Systems, Inc Integrated radiation therapy systems and methods for treating a target in a patient
8269195, Aug 12 2003 Loma Linda University Medical Center Patient alignment system with external measurement and object coordination for radiation therapy system
8295437, Dec 13 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiotherapy
8306186, Dec 13 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiotherapy
8308361, Jun 11 2002 Medtronic Navigation, Inc. Cantilevered gantry apparatus for X-ray imaging
8320524, Oct 16 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiotherapy
8340742, Jul 23 2004 Varian Medical Systems, Inc Integrated radiation therapy systems and methods for treating a target in a patient
8363783, Dec 23 2007 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Method and device for ocular alignment and coupling of ocular structures
8376613, Oct 30 2001 Loma Linda University Medical Center Method and device for delivering radiotherapy
8418288, Aug 12 2003 Loma Linda University Medical Center Modular patient support system
8442185, Jul 18 2007 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiosurgery
8452375, May 14 1998 Varian Medical Systems, Inc Systems and methods for locating and defining a target location within a human body
8457277, Apr 09 2007 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiosurgery
8479743, Jun 25 2004 Loma Linda University Medical Center Method and device for registration and immobilization
8494116, Dec 23 2007 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Methods and devices for orthovoltage ocular radiotherapy and treatment planning
8503609, Dec 23 2007 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Methods and devices for detecting, controlling, and predicting radiation delivery
8506558, Jan 11 2008 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC System and method for performing an ocular irradiation procedure
8512236, Jan 11 2008 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC System and method for positioning and stabilizing an eye
8523630, Nov 21 2006 Loma Linda University Medical Center Device and method for immobilizing patients for breast radiation therapy
8569720, Aug 12 2003 Loma Linda University Medical Center Patient alignment system with external measurement and object coordination for radiation therapy system
8611497, Oct 16 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Portable orthovoltage radiotherapy
8630388, Dec 23 2007 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Method and device for ocular alignment and coupling of ocular structures
8644571, Dec 06 2011 Loma Linda University Medical Center Intensity-modulated proton therapy
8678647, Mar 19 2002 Medtronic Navigation, Inc. Systems and methods for imaging large field-of-view objects
8746973, Mar 13 2002 Medtronic Navigation, Inc Systems and methods for quasi-simultaneous multi-planar x-ray imaging
8750453, Aug 12 2003 Loma Linda University Medical Center Path planning and collision avoidance for movement of instruments in a radiation therapy environment
8761336, Oct 16 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiotherapy
8787524, Dec 13 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiotherapy
8837675, Oct 16 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Ocular radiosurgery
8848869, Dec 23 2007 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Methods and devices for detecting, controlling, and predicting radiation delivery
8855267, Jul 18 2007 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiosurgery
8857043, Dec 30 2002 Varian Medical Systems, Inc Method of manufacturing an implantable marker with a leadless signal transmitter
8908162, Feb 24 2011 IDI Dental, Inc. System for aligning a collimator and an alignment ring
8920406, Jan 11 2008 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Device and assembly for positioning and stabilizing an eye
8923479, Dec 23 2007 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Method and device for ocular alignment and coupling of ocular structures
8976236, Nov 08 2011 Surgical light and video control system and method of use
8981324, Aug 12 2003 Loma Linda University Medical Center Patient alignment system with external measurement and object coordination for radiation therapy system
8995618, Oct 16 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Portable orthovoltage radiotherapy
9025727, Dec 23 2007 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Methods and devices for orthovoltage ocular radiotherapy and treatment planning
9072895, Jun 08 2001 Varian Medical Systems, Inc Guided radiation therapy system
9084886, Nov 21 2006 Loma Linda University Medical Center Device and method for immobilizing patients for breast radiation therapy
9220920, Dec 06 2011 CARMEL - HAIFA UNIVERSITY ECONOMIC CORPORATION LTD Intensity-modulated proton therapy
9237860, Jun 05 2008 Varian Medical Systems, Inc Motion compensation for medical imaging and associated systems and methods
9248003, Dec 31 2003 Varian Medical Systems, Inc Receiver used in marker localization sensing system and tunable to marker frequency
9272161, Dec 13 2006 CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC Orthovoltage radiotherapy
9398886, Mar 19 2002 Medtronic Navigation, Inc. Systems and methods for imaging large field-of-view objects
9555265, Dec 06 2011 Loma Linda University Medical Center Intensity-modulated ion therapy
9616248, Jul 23 2004 Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Integrated radiation therapy systems and methods for treating a target in a patient
9623263, Aug 12 2003 Loma Linda University Medical Center Path planning and collision avoidance for movement of instruments in a radiation therapy environment
9682253, Jul 23 2004 Varian Medical Systems, Inc Integrated radiation therapy systems and methods for treating a target in a patient
9724058, Mar 19 2002 Medtronic Navigation, Inc. Systems and methods for imaging large field-of-view objects
9884206, Jul 23 2015 CARMEL-HAIFA UNIVERSITY ECONOMIC CORPORATION LTD Systems and methods for intensity modulated radiation therapy
RE49349, Mar 19 2002 Medtronic Navigation, Inc. Systems and methods for imaging large field-of-view objects
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4314158, Apr 01 1980 Siemens Medical Laboratories, Inc. Electron applicator for a linear accelerator
4638814, Sep 11 1984 SIEMENS MEDICAL LABORATORIES, INC Electron accelerator unit for electron beam therapy
5027818, Dec 03 1987 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED A NOT FOR PROFIT CORP OF FLORIDA Dosimetric technique for stereotactic radiosurgery same
5233990, Jan 13 1992 Method and apparatus for diagnostic imaging in radiation therapy
5315630, Mar 11 1992 DEUTSCHES KREBSFORSCHUNGSZENTRUM Positioning device in medical apparatus
5446548, Oct 08 1993 National Research Council of Canada; Siemens Medical Systems, Inc Patient positioning and monitoring system
5553112, Jun 06 1995 Medical Instrumentation and Diagnostics Corp. Laser measuring apparatus and method for radiosurgery/stereotactic radiotherapy alignment
///
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Aug 13 1996HUGHES, JOHN H Siemens Medical Systems, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0081930558 pdf
Aug 16 1996Siemens Medical Systems, Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Aug 01 2001Siemens Medical Systems, IncSiemens Medical Solutions USA, IncCHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0234010699 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Jan 30 2001ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Sep 20 2001M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Sep 19 2005M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Sep 15 2009M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Apr 28 20014 years fee payment window open
Oct 28 20016 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 28 2002patent expiry (for year 4)
Apr 28 20042 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Apr 28 20058 years fee payment window open
Oct 28 20056 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 28 2006patent expiry (for year 8)
Apr 28 20082 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Apr 28 200912 years fee payment window open
Oct 28 20096 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 28 2010patent expiry (for year 12)
Apr 28 20122 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)