A process of oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation carried out in the presence of emulsifiers that are polyoxyethylene half ester of vic-dicarboxylic acids which give latices that are stable especially to coagulation by electrolytes, shear and/or freezing is disclosed. Particularly suitable emulsifiers are of the formulae (I) or (II):

Y.OOC.(HR)C.C(HR1).COO.(AO)n.R2 (I)

Y.OOC.(HR)C.C(HR1).COO.(AO)n.CO.(HR1)C.C(HR)COO.Y(II)

where: R, R1, AO, n, R2 and Y are as defined, in particular where the emulsifiers are polyoxyethylene half esters of alkenyl succinic acids.

Patent
   5807923
Priority
Aug 23 1993
Filed
Jul 16 1996
Issued
Sep 15 1998
Expiry
Aug 19 2014
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
1
5
all paid
1. A process of oil-in-water emulsion polymerization in which the oil phase includes at least one ethylenically unsaturated monomer to be polymerized wherein the emulsion is stabilized by one or more compounds of the formula (I) or (II):
Y.OOC.(HR)C.C(HR1).COO.(AO)n.R2 (I)
where:
one of R and R1 is C12 to C22 alkenyl or alkyl and the other is hydrogen;
(AO)n represents a polyalkylene oxide chain of units AO, of the formula --(Cm H2m O)--, where m is 2 or 3 and may vary along the chain, which includes ethylene oxide units and which may include up to 50 mole % of propylene oxide units;
n is 8 to 100;
R2 is hydrogen or C1 to C8 alkyl; and
Y is a cation forming group; or
Y.OOC.(HR)C.C(HR1).COO.(AO)n.CO.(HR1)C.C(HR).COO.Y(II)
where:
one of R and R1 is C12 to C22 alkenyl or alkyl and the other is hydrogen;
n, AO, and Y are independently as defined above for formula (I).
2. A process as claimed in claim 1 in which the group R or R1 which is not hydrogen is a C12 to C16 alkenyl group; R2 is hydrogen or a methyl, ethyl, propyl, or butyl group; Y is H, alkali metal, or ammonium; AO is --CH2.CH2 O--; and n is from 12 to 50.
3. A process as claimed in either claim 1 or claim 2 which is the polymerization or copolymerization of one or more monomers selected from the group consisting of acrylic monomers, acrylate monomers, vinylic monomers, olefinic monomers, vicinal dicarboxylic acids and vicinal dicarboxylic acid anhydrides, amides and imides.
4. A process as claimed in claim 3 which is the polymerization or copolymerization of one or more olefinic monomers selected from the group consisting of ethylene, propylene, butadiene, isoprene, isobutadiene, chloroprene.
5. A process as claimed in claim 1 in which the polymerization reaction mixture further includes one or more other surfactants and/or protective colloids.
6. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein Y is hydrogen, alkali metal, ammonium, amine ammonium, or an alkanolamine ammonium.
7. A process as claimed in claim 6 wherein the alkali metal is selected from the group consisting of sodium and potassium.

This application is filed under 35 U.S. C. 371 based on PCT/GB94/01814, filed Aug. 19, 1994.

This invention relates to an oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation process carried out in the presence of a particular surfactants, especially vic-dicarboxylic acid polyalkyleneoxy half esters.

PCT application No PCT/GB 93/01335 published as WO 94/000508 A, describes a class of derivatives, particularly esters, of vicinal dicarboxylic acids, particularly alkenyl or alkyl substituted succinic acids. Various uses of these are described, for example as emulsifying agents. We have now found a sub-class of the compounds described in the PCT Application are particularly useful as oil-in-water emulsifying agents in the polymerisation of ethylenic monomers.

Accordingly, the invention provides a process of oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation is characterised by the presence of at least one polyoxyethylene half ester of a vic-dicarboxylic acid.

More particularly, the invention provides a process of oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation in which the oil phase includes at least one ethylenically unsaturated monomer to be polymerised wherein the emulsion is stabilised by one or more compounds of the formula (I) or (II):

Y.OOC.(HR)C.C(HR1).COO.(AO)n.R2 (I)

where

one of R and R1 is C8 to C22 alkenyl or alkyl and the other is hydrogen;

(AO)n represents a polyalkylene oxide chain of units AO, of the formula --(Cm Hzm O)-- where m is 2 or 3 (and may vary along the chain), which includes ethylene oxide units and which may include up to 50 mole % of propylene oxide units;

n is 8 to 100 (and as it is an average it may be non-integral);

R2 is hydrogen or C1 to C6 alkyl; and

Y is a cation forming group, particularly H, alkali metal especially sodium or potassium, or ammonium (especially NH4, amine ammonium or alkanolamine ammonium); or

Y.OOC.(HR)C.C(HR1).COO.(AO)n.CO.(HR1)C.C(HR)COO.Y(II)

where:

n, AO each pair of R and R1, and Y are independently as defined above for formula (I).

In the formulae (I) and (II) above the following represent particularly useful materials as emulsifiers in the process of this invention.

The group R or R1 which is not hydrogen alkenyl or alkyl is very desirably a C12 to C16 alkenyl or alkyl, especially alkenyl, group. When the group R2 is C1 to C6 alkyl it is desirably a methyl, ethyl, propyl, or butyl group, particularly a methyl group. Y is a cation forming group i.e. a group that can ionise from the rest of the molecule to form a cation thus leaving the residue of the molecule anionic i.e. negatively charged. In particular, it is hydrogen, alkali metal, especially sodium or potassium, or ammonium, especially NH4, amine ammonium or alkanolamine ammonium.

The alkylene oxide chain represented by (AO)n is of units AO of the formula --(Cm Hzm O)-- where m is 2 or 3 (and may vary along the chain) includes ethylene oxide units and desirably is polyethylene oxide chain i.e. the group AO is --(CH2.CH2 O)--. However, the chain may include a minor molar proportion of propylene oxide residues --(C3 H6 O)--. When the chain includes propylene oxide residues then these residues are desirably present as a block at the end of the alkylene oxide chain adjacent the carboxyl function. The number of alkylene oxide residues in the chain is from 8 to 100, particularly from 12 to 50, including polyethylene glycol (polyethylene oxide chains--PEG) chains equivalent to PEG 600 to PEG 2000.

Preferred emulsifiers used in this invention are generally as set out in our co-pending application, but the process especially employs such half esters containing anionic groups and/or groups ionisable to form an anion. Preferred emulsifiers used in the present invention contain anionically ionisable groups.

The polymerisation reaction mixture may include materials such as one or more other surfactants, such as alkyl phenol ethoxylates, alcohol ethoxylates and their sulphate or phosphate esters; alkyl and arallkyl sulphonates; alcohol sulphates; sulphosuccinate mono- and di-esters; alkylene oxide block copolymers, such as ethylene oxide propylene oxide copolymers; and end carboxylated ethoxylates (ether carboxylates); and/or protective colloids, such as water soluble cellulose ethers, e.g. carboxymethyl cellulose and hydroxyethyl cellulose; polyvinyl alcohol; and gums, such as xanthan and guar gums.

The oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation process of this invention can be carried out at pH values over a wide range, for example 3 to 11, particularly 4 to 10 especially 4 to 5 or 9 to 10.

The latex formed by the polymerisation is capable of high stability to electrolytes, shear and/or freezing, in particular against coagulation by such factors in uses where it is requires to resist coagulation.

The monomers (co)polymerisable in the process of this invention include acrylic species such as acrylate and (alpha alkyl) acrylate esters; acrylonitrile; and water insoluble (alpha alkyl) acrylamides, including cationic and quaternary species; vinylic species, such as vinyl chloride, vinyl esters, vinyl ethers, vinyl pyridines and styrenes; other olefinic species, such as ethylene, propylene, butadiene, isoprene, isobutadiene, and chloroprene; and vicinal dicarboxylic acids and their ethers anhydrides, amides and imides. Acryic monomers are particularly desirable as latices from acrylic monomers show particularly good freeze thaw stability when made by the process of this invention.

This list of monomers which are (co)polymerisable in the process includes species, such as isoprene, butadiene, isobutadiene, chloroprene, styrenes, and acrylonitrile and accordingly, the process of oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation according to this invention may be used in the production of emulsion rubber latices, including those of styrene butadiene rubbers (SBR), acrylonitrile butadiene rubbers (NBR), isoprene rubbers, isobutadiene rubbers and chloroprene rubbers.

The polymerisation catalyst in the process in general may be any conventional emulsion polymerisation catalyst compatible with the presence of the vic-dicarboxylic acid polyalkyleneoxy half ester, for example a peroxidic compound such as a persulphate.

The following Examples illustrate the invention. All parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise stated.

Emulsifiers A to E are control emulsifiers included for comparison

A--Rhodapex CO 436 sulphated ethoxylated nonylphenol with an average of 4 moles ethylene oxide--ex Rhone Poulenc

B--Rhodapex EP110 sulphated ethoxylated nonylphenol with an average of 9 moles ethylene oxide--ex Rhone Poulenc

C--Atpol HM935 sulphosuccinate half ester surfactant ex ICI

D--Atlas G-3300B ex ICI

Emulsifiers A to D are commercially available materials, which contain anionically ionisable groups, used in emulsion polymerisation.

E--Synperonic NP13 --an ethoxylated nonyl phenol with an average of 13 moles ethylene oxide--ex ICI

Emulsifiers F1 to F5 are materials used in this invention and are of the formula:

H.OOC.(HR)C.C(HR1).COO.(CH2.CH2 O)n.H

where: one of R and R1 is an alkenyl group (as given below) and the other is hydrogen and n is as given below

______________________________________
R/R1
n (on average)
______________________________________
F1 C14 alkenyl
13.6
F2 C12 alkenyl
13.6
F3 C12 alkenyl
9
F4 C16 alkenyl
13.6
F5 C18 alkenyl
22.6
F6 C12 alkenyl
16
F7 C14 alkenyl
22
F8 C16 alkenyl
12
F9 C16 alkenyl
16
______________________________________

Viscosity (Visc.)

is Brookfield viscosity measured using spindle 4 at speed 2, results are quoted in mPas.

Particle Size (Size)

for Examples 1 and 3 was measured using a Malvern Zetasizer, and for Example 2 using a Malvern Mastersizer. The mean particle size is quoted in nm

Electrolyte Stability (ES)

Equal quantities of polymer emulsion and 5% w/w calcium chloride solution were thoroughly mixed and then allowed to stand for 24 hours after which the stability was assessed.

Shear Stability (SS)

the latex was subject to shearing using a rotating Diaf dissolver disc at 50 Hz for 30 minutes. The latex was assessed one day and one week after the exposure to shear.

Freeze-thaw Stability (FTS)

A sample of neutralised latex was cooled to -20°C over 1 hour held at this temperature for 11 hours, heated to +23°C over 1 hour and held at this temperature for 11 hours. This cycle was repeated 5 times and the final result evaluated.

The results for Electrolyte Stability Shear Stability and Freeze-thaw Stability are based on the following assessment criteria:

good--no sign of individually visible particles

fair--latex appearance retained, but visible particles formed

fail--large flocs formed

The Oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation of butyl acrylate/methyl methacrylate/maleic anhydride (48.8:49.9:1.3 by weight).

A polymerisation reactor was charged with the following:

demineralised water 165.5 g

sodium persulphate 0.5 g

emulsifier 15 g

Monomer charge 51 g

The reactor was purged with nitrogen gas for 5 minutes and then heated to 85°C and held at that temperature for 5 minutes. The following two streams were then fed to it simultaneously while holding the temperature at 85°C:

a) over 2 hours monomer mixture 462 g

b) over 2 hours 15 minutes a solution of

sodium persulphate 1.3 g

in demineralised water 46.7 g

After the monomer addition was complete, the reaction mixture was held over another 2 h at 85°C to ensure minimal residual monomer levels. The resulting latex was allowed to cool, neutralised with aqueous ammonia (as NH4 OH) to pH 9.4±0.2, then bottled for storage. Table 1 below shows a selection of properties of the latices produced.

The oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation of vinyl acetate/butyl acrylate (85:15 molar)

A polymerisation reactor was charged with the following:

demineralised water 403.75 g

Natrosol 250MR 2.75 g

(hydroxyethyl cellulose)

sodium bicarbonate 2.00 g

sodium persulphate 0.5 g

emulsifier 15.0 g

The reactor was purged for 20 minutes with nitrogen gas, heated to 75°C and held at that temperature for 15 minutes. The following two streams were then fed to it simultaneously (as in Example 1), while holding the temperature at 75°C

a) over 2 hours monomer mixture 462 g

b) over 2 hours 15 minutes a solution of:

sodium persulphate 1.3 g

in demineralised water 46.7 g

After the monomer addition was complete, the reaction mixture was held over another 2 h at 75°C to ensure minimal residual monomer levels. The resulting latex was allowed to cool, then bottled for storage. Table 2 below shows a selection of the properties of the latices produced.

The oil-in-water polymerisation of butyl acrylate/methyl methacrylate-methacrylic acid (136.8:140:3.5 by weight) A butyl acrylate/methyl methacrylate/methacrylic acid latex was made at a nominal solids content of 38% by a seeded semi-continuous method. A polymerisation reactor was charged with the following:

demineralised water 417.1 g

sodium persulphate 0.25 g

emulsifier 6.9 g

monomer charge 7.5 g

Two feeds were made up with following composition:

monomer feed 272.6 g

initiator feed

sodium persulphate 0.5 g

demineralised water 45.0 g

The reactor charge and monomer feed were purged with nitrogen for 20 minutes. The reactor charge was then heated to 85°C and held at this temperature for 5 minutes. The monomer feed and the initiator feed were then simultaneously added to the reactor charge in two streams; the monomer feed over 2 hours and the initiator feed for the 2 hours and a further 15 minutes. The reactor mixture was then held at 85°C for a further 2 hours after which the latex was allowed to cool. The pH and particle size of this latex were measured on this acidic latex. The remainder of the latex was neutralised to pH 9.4±0.2 and was then bottled for storage. Further measurement of particle size and pH and the remaining tests were carried out on the neutralised latex. The results of the testing are set out in Table 3 below.

TABLE 1
______________________________________
Visc. Size
Emul. (mPas) pH (nm) ES SS FTS
______________________________________
A <100 9.3 -- fail good fail
B <100 9.4 73 fail good fail
C <100 9.6 76 fail good fail
D -- -- -- -- -- --
E 900 9.5 120 good fair fail
F1 <100 9.5 176 good good good
F2 <100 9.4 202 good good good
F3 -- 9.5 433 good good good
F4 -- 9.4 218 good good good
F5 -- 9.5 168 good good good
______________________________________
TABLE 2
______________________________________
Visc. Size
Emul. (mPas) pH (nm) ES SS FTS
______________________________________
A 1000 4.5 620 good good fail
B 3200 4.6 -- good fair fail
C 100 5.3 1150 good good fail
F1 5200 4.4 1310 good good good
F2 1000 4.1 -- good -- --
F3 200 4.6 1880 good good good
F4 1700 4.4 2270 good fair good
F5 700 4.3 1110 good good good
______________________________________
TABLE 3
______________________________________
Particle
Visc. pH size (nm)
Emuls. (mPas) + - + - ES SS FTS
______________________________________
A <100 -- 9.3 -- -- fail good fail
B <100 -- 9.4 -- 72.7
fail good fail
E <100 2.6 9.2 132.7
120.3
fail sed fail
F1 <100 2.4 9.2 185.7
189.2
good good good
F2 <100 -- 9.4 -- 201.9
good good good
F4 <100 2.3 9.2 165.0
218.2
good good good
F5 <100 2.3 9.2 164.0
167.8
good t.cr good
F6 <100 2.3 9.2 144.3
197.0
good good good
F7 <100 2.3 9.2 122.6
187.0
good sed good
F8 <100 2.4 9.2 162.5
208.4
good good good
F9 <100 2.3 9.2 123.1
173.3
good fair good
______________________________________
notes to Table 3
+ measurement before neutralisation
- measurement after neutralisation
sed some sediment formed
t.cr slight creaming noted

Sleegers, Mark Joannes Ludovicus

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10048408, Dec 15 2011 3M Innovative Properties Company Anti-fog coating comprising aqueous polymeric dispersion, crosslinker and acid or salt of polyalkylene oxide
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4256605, Mar 23 1978 Imperial Chemical Industries Limited Surfactant composition, and concentrate and emulsion including same
4263413, May 01 1979 Union Carbide Corporation Half esters of organic polyols and a process for their production
4525525, Mar 30 1983 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft (Henkel KGaA) Use of bis-semiesters of sulfosuccinic acid with polyether diols based on ethylene oxide/propylene oxide or their salts as surface-active agents
4695401, Dec 13 1982 Chevron Research Company Nonionic emulsifier and substituted succinic anhydride compositions therewith
WO9400508,
///
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Feb 19 1996SLEEGERS, MARK JOANNES LUDOVICUSImperial Chemical Industries PLCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0082810391 pdf
Jul 16 1996Imperial Chemical Industries PLC(assignment on the face of the patent)
Feb 05 2007Imperial Chemical Industries, PLCCRODA INTERNATIONAL PLCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0199650235 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Feb 19 2002M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Mar 01 2002ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Feb 14 2006M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Jan 12 2010RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned.
Jan 14 2010ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Mar 11 2010M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Sep 15 20014 years fee payment window open
Mar 15 20026 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Sep 15 2002patent expiry (for year 4)
Sep 15 20042 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Sep 15 20058 years fee payment window open
Mar 15 20066 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Sep 15 2006patent expiry (for year 8)
Sep 15 20082 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Sep 15 200912 years fee payment window open
Mar 15 20106 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Sep 15 2010patent expiry (for year 12)
Sep 15 20122 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)