The apparatus for determining rotational position of a rotatable element without contacting it includes a sensor device having two Hall or AMR sensor elements for sensing a magnetic field of magnetic field strength (B) generated by or influenced by the rotational position of the rotatable element and for producing output signals according to the magnetic field and thus the rotational position of the rotatable element. In order to easily detect the absolute rotational position of the rotatable element, the sensor device is constructed and positioned with respect to the rotatable element so that in every rotational position the field lines from the rotatable element extend at right angles to the sensor structures defined by the direction of an alternating current in the sensor elements. Using different embodiments of an electronic evaluation circuit, the direction components of the magnetic field are evaluated to determine the rotational position by comparing the input current to one of the sensors and the sum of the output signals of the respective sensor elements. Either sinusoidal or rectangular alternating voltages or direct voltages are input to the sensor elements.
|
12. An apparatus for determining rotational position of a rotatable element without contact with the rotatable element, said apparatus comprising
a sensor device having two sensor elements (30,31) for sensing a magnetic field of magnetic field strength (B) generated by the rotatable element or influenced by rotation of the rotatable element and for producing sensor output signals according to said magnetic field, said sensor elements having sensor outputs at which said sensor output signals appear; and evaluation circuit means for evaluating said output signals including means (28,29) for supplying said two sensor elements with respective rectangular currents having an angular frequency (ω), pulse duty factors of 50% and phase differences of one-fourth of a period, to produce respective output voltages at said sensor outputs; means (32,33) for amplifying said output voltages to form amplified output voltages; means (34) for summing said amplified output voltages to form a sum signal; means (35) for filtering the sum signal to form a filtered sum signal; and a phase comparator (36) for producing a rotational position signal according to the rotational position of the rotatable element from the filtered sum signal and said rectangular current supplied to one of the two sensor elements.
14. An apparatus for determining rotational position of a rotatable element without contact with the rotatable element, said apparatus comprising
a sensor device having two sensor elements (30,31) for sensing a magnetic field of magnetic field strength (B) generated by the rotatable element or influenced by rotation of the rotatable element and for producing sensor output signals according to said magnetic field, said sensor elements having sensor outputs at which said sensor output signals appear; and evaluation circuit means for evaluating said output signals including means (28,29) for triggering said two sensor elements with a direct voltage (Vs) to produce respective output voltages (Ua1,Ua2) at said sensor outputs given by formulae IVa and ivb: Ua1 (kα)=C Vs cos(kα) (IVa) Ua2 (kα)=C Vs sin(kα) (ivb); wherein is an angle of rotation of the rotatable element, K is constant such that K is the phase factor and C is another constant; means (51) for amplifying a difference between said respective output voltages (Ua1,Ua2) to form an amplified difference signal, said means for amplifying having respective inputs connected to respective switch terminals; means (48a, 48b, 50, 49) for periodically alternately switching said respective output voltages (Ua1, Ua2) between said respective switch terminals; means (52) for filtering the amplified difference signal to form a filtered difference signal; and a phase comparator (36) for producing a rotational position signal according to the rotational position of the rotatable element from the filtered difference signal and a switching signal supplied by said means for switching said respective output voltages. 1. An apparatus for determining rotational position of a rotatable element without contact with the rotatable element, said apparatus comprising
a sensor device having at least two sensor elements for sensing a magnetic field of magnetic field strength (B) generated by the rotatable element or influenced by rotation of the rotatable element and for producing output signals according to said magnetic field, said sensor elements having sensor outputs; and evaluation circuit means for evaluating said output signals including means for supplying said at least two sensor elements with respective alternating currents (I1, I2) that are 90° out of phase in accordance with formulae Ia and ib: I1 =Io cos(ωt) (Ia) I2 =Io sin(ωt) (ib) to produce respective output voltages (UH1, UH2) at said sensor outputs according to formulae IIa and iib: UH1 =C1 B1 cos(kα) I1 (t) (IIa) UH2 =C2 B2 sin(kα) I2 (t) (iib) wherein t is time, ω is frequency in reciprocal time units, Io is a constant and is a maximum current value for I1 and I2, C1 =C2 =C=another constant and B1 =B2 =B=an additional constant magnetic field strength value, such that C1 B1 and C2 B2 are maximum voltage values and are equal, α is an angle of rotation of the rotatable element and K is a constant such that kα is the phase factor; means (23) for summing said output voltages (UH1, UH2) to form a sum signal; and a phase comparator (25) for producing a rotational position signal proportional to the rotational position of the rotatable element from the sum signal and said alternating current supplied to one of the at least two sensor elements. 2. The apparatus as defined in
3. The apparatus as defined in
4. The apparatus as defined in
5. The apparatus as defined in
UH1 =C1 I1 (t) B cos(α) (1) UH2 =C2 I2 (t) B sin(α) (2), wherein said UH2 is offset by 90° from UH1, said C1 =C2 and C1 and C2 are material constants for the Hall sensors and B is a magnetic field strength value perpendicular to a plane of the Hall sensors when said field strength is the same at both of said Hall sensors. 6. The apparatus as defined in
7. The apparatus as defined in
8. The apparatus as defined in
9. The apparatus as defined in
Kα=arc tan (UH1 /UH2) (3). 10. The apparatus as defined in
11. The apparatus as defined in
13. The apparatus as defined in
15. The apparatus as defined in
16. The apparatus as defined in
|
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to an apparatus for determining rotational position of a rotatable element, especially a rotating shaft in a motor vehicle, without contacting it and, more particularly, to an apparatus for determining rotational position that includes a sensor device having Hall or AMR sensor elements for sensing a magnetic field of magnetic field strength (B) generated by or influenced by the rotational position of the rotatable element and for producing output signals according to the magnetic field and thus the rotational position of the rotatable element.
2. Prior Art
An apparatus of this type, with which detection of the angle of rotation can be carried out, is known from EP-O 217 478 B1, for example. Here the magnetic field lines issuing from a rotating magnet are detected and evaluated by an angle sensor, which is formed from two parallel thin films of magnetically soft material. The magnetic films in the angle sensor are mounted such that in the plane of the field lines power supply connections and voltage measuring connections, respectively, are staggered by 45° and connected to the two films. Due to resistance anisotropy in the films the result is a sensor signal dependent on the direction of the angular position of the field lines, a signal that can be processed in an evaluation circuit. In this known configuration, however, angle determination can take place only in the range of 180°, which results in higher cost for proper detection of the angular position.
Sampling of incremental structures on gear wheels made of ferromagnetic material is also known, where sampling is carried out using contactless sensor configurations, for ignition control in internal combustion engines or for speed detection for anti-lock systems, for example. An article in VDI-Bericht, No. 509 (VDI-Verlag 1984), Pages 263 to 268, entitled "Neue, alternative Losungen fur Drehzahlsensoren im Kraftfahrzeug auf magnetoresistiver Basis" [New Alternative Solutions for Magnetoresistive-Based Speed Sensors in Motor Vehicles], for example, describes how sampling of incremental structures on rotating shafts or gear wheels in a manner that is especially simple and particularly insensitive to air-gap fluctuations can be carried out using magnetic tangential probes as sensors. This is possible because the sign of the tangential component of a permanent magnet located in the sensor is not a function of the size of the air gap between the sensor and the rotatable elements. A change in this sign can only be effected by a further rotor-like movement of the shaft or gear wheel, by which means an incremental change in the angle of rotation of a gear wheel can be detected.
The known publication cited above also describes the use of sensors that utilize the "Hall effect" for sampling a change in a magnetic field on page 264 in section 3.3. These Hall sensors, the design of which is known, utilize deflection of a current flowing between two connection poles brought about by a magnetic field positioned perpendicular to it. In this case a charge carrier displacement in the direction of the magnetic field lines results in the development of "Hall voltage," which can be tapped at right angles to the current flow direction. Utilizing the properties of Hall structures in semiconductor materials that are optimum for this purpose, the current flow direction in this Hall structure generally runs coplanarly in the plane of a "semi-conductor wafer," for example a silicon semiconductor chip.
The tangential field detection necessary for sampling on rotatable elements is in this case disadvantageous, since as a result of the unavoidable tangential lengthening of the conventional type of Hall sensor, a considerable air gap between the rotatable element and the sensor results (approximately 2 mm to 4 mm) and the effect of the field lines running perpendicular to the wafer plane is sharply reduced. Since the field strength decreases exponentially in relation to the distance between the rotatable element and the sensor, the measurement effect that can be evaluated becomes very small in this case. In order to detect a signal that is not a function of the air gap using the known method, differential detection of the radially oriented field must be carried out with two Hall sensors that may also need to be adjusted, especially to the increment widths (tooth spacing in gear wheels). Use of materials having a higher sensitivity oriented in a different direction such as magnetoresistive thin-film sensors, permalloy sensors or even "pseudo-Hall sensors" as an alternative to silicon semiconductor Hall sensors is possible, but the manufacturing technology for these materials is expensive, particularly if they are to be connected to an amplifier circuit or integrated with it.
In addition, Hall sensors are known (from Sensors and Materials, 5.2 (1993) 091-101, MYU, Tokyo, the article "Simulation, Design and Fabrication of a Vertical Hall Device for Two-Dimensional Magnetic Field Sensing" by M. Parajape, Lg. Ristic and W. Allegretto) in which the Hall structure extends perpendicular to the wafer surface to the depth of a silicon chip. Thus in this case detection of the tangentially oriented field is possible without increasing the air gap to an intolerable degree.
These Hall sensors, as known from the second publication, require a small degree of expansion and consequently a very small air gap, which consists essentially of only the wafer thickness (approximately 400 μm) plus a protective coating. Detection of components of a two-dimensional magnetic field using two Hall sensors that are offset by 90° is also known from this publication.
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved apparatus for determining rotational position of a rotatable element of the above-described kind that does not have the above-described disadvantages.
These objects, and others which will be made more apparent hereinafter, are attained in an apparatus for determining rotational position of a rotatable element without contacting it including a sensor device having at least two sensor elements for sensing a magnetic field of magnetic field strength (B) generated by the rotatable element or influenced by the rotation of the rotatable element and for producing output signals according to the magnetic field and thus the rotational position of the rotatable element.
According to the invention, the apparatus has an evaluation circuit means for evaluating the output signals of the sensors that comprises means for supplying the at least two sensor elements with respective alternating currents that are 90° out of phase in accordance with formulae Ia and Ib:
I1 =Io cos(ωt) (Ia)
I2 =Io sin(ωt) (Ib)
to produce respective output voltages (UH1, UH2) at said sensor outputs according to formulae IIa and IIb:
UH1 =C1 B1 cos(Kα) I1 (t) (IIa)
UH2 =C2 B2 sin(Kα) I2 (t) (IIb),
wherein t is time, ω is frequency in reciprocal time units, Io is a constant and is a maximum current value for I1 and I2, C1 =C2 =C=another constant and B1 =B2 =B=an additional constant magnetic field strength value, such that C1 B1 and C2 B2 are maximum voltage values and are equal, α is an angle of rotation of the rotatable element and K is a constant such that Kα is the phase factor; means (3) for summing the output voltages (UH1, UH2) to form a sum signal; and a phase comparator (25) for producing a rotational position signal proportional to the angle of rotation from the rotatable element from the sum signal and an alternating current supplied to one of the at least two sensor elements.
The configuration of the invention for contactless detection of the angle of rotation of a rotatable element, utilizing the Hall effect or a magnetoresistive effect, has the advantage that tangential field detection of a magnetic field generated or influenced by the rotatable element and having a small air gap, for example, is possible with a high degree of accuracy. Due to their smaller dimensions in the planar plane, the sensor elements, which are arranged vertically in a surface such as a silicon wafer, permit effective sensor placement in the vicinity of the rotatable element, whereby additional three-dimensional micromechanical structuring can increase the sensitivity of the sensor. In this case the electronic circuits required for signal conditioning can be advantageously integrated into the same silicon chip in which the sensor elements are located. In this case, as mentioned above, it is possible to avoid the disadvantage of an incremental angle-of-rotation measuring system that is based on an increment count that can be permanently destroyed from the outside.
By using two vertical Hall sensor elements rotationally offset by 90° or two AMR sensor elements rotationally offset by 45° on rotatable elements in accordance with the invention, two components of an external field located in the plane of the surface bearing the sensor elements can be detected easily and very precisely. In this case the rotational position of the rotatable element likewise changes the rotational position of the generated or influenced magnetic field and consequently the field components in the plane of the surface bearing the sensor elements. In the configuration of the invention therefore the absolute rotational position of the rotatable element can also be detected at any time and is not limited to increments. Electronic evaluation can be advantageously undertaken since the signals generated by the field components vary according to a sine or cosine law and determination of the rotational position value with analog or digital circuits can be carried out by converting trigonometric formulas using circuit engineering techniques. Such advantageous evaluation is possible if one of the sensor elements is excited by a sinusoidal signal and the other by a cosinusoidal signal. Especially advantageous is the fact that circuit-engineering conversion is suitable for the evaluation of signals from selectable sensors, whereby feed signals are combined with control signals in an appropriate way, especially multiplicatively.
If the sensor elements are triggered by suitable rectangular signals having an angular frequency ω, for example by two square-wave voltages having a 50% pulse duty factor and a phase difference of one-fourth of a period, then particular advantageous possibilities result. For example, such rectangular signals are simpler to generate than phase- and amplitude-constant sinusoidal or cosinusoidal signals. Moreover, no problems with the amplitude or phase constancy of these signals occur.
A ratiometric analog output voltage can easily be generated, or even a pulse-duration-modulated output signal, if desired. Zero shifts or calibrations as well as compensation of static sensor and/or evaluation circuit errors can be accomplished in analog or digital form, and the entire sensor and evaluation circuit configuration can be completely integrated.
The sensor temperature can be determined by measuring the current consumption during generation of rectangular signals; in this way advantageous compensation of temperature-dependent sensor properties is possible.
In another advantageous embodiment of the invention the two sensors are triggered by direct voltages, and the generated output voltage is processed by means of two electronic switches. A zero shift can also be compensated with an embodiment of this type.
Additional advantageous embodiments of the invention are given in the subclaims.
The objects, features and advantages of the invention will now be illustrated in more detail with the aid of the following description of the preferred embodiments, with reference to the accompanying figures in which:
FIG. 1 is a partial cross-sectional, partially perspective view of an angle-of-rotation detection apparatus on a rotatable shaft with a schematic diagram of a sensor configuration;
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the sensor configuration of FIG. 1 with two Hall sensors offset by 90°;
FIG. 3 is a graphical illustration of the dependence of the sensor output voltages and the resulting output signals on angle of rotation;
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an evaluation circuit for determination of the angle of rotation of the rotatable shaft;
FIGS. 5 through 7 are block diagrams of embodiments for control systems involving rectangular signals;
FIG. 8 is block diagram of a concrete circuit; and
FIGS. 9 and 10 are block diagrams of embodiments in which the sensors are triggered by direct voltage and the output signals are processed by using switches.
The invention shall be explained with reference to embodiments in which the sensor elements are two Hall sensors, for example. The invention can likewise be implemented using other magnetoresistive sensors, i.e., sensors whose resistance varies as a function of the magnetic field.
FIG. 1 shows a shaft 1 that can rotate by the angle α and carries at its end a permanent magnet 2 as an element that can rotate along with it. α is the angle that is to be measured. The magnetic field lines B of the magnet 2 run in this case through an upper section 3 of a housing 4, whereby in this upper section 3 a sensor configuration 5, comprising two Hall sensors offset by 90° (cf. FIG. 2), is permanently installed. The representation of the Hall sensors is in this case only schematic, since they can be integrated into a coating and thus no longer need to appear visibly. The directional components of the field lines in this case cause specific output signals from the two Hall sensors, by which means both the absolute rotational position and a change in the rotational position by any angle variation α can be evaluated using the electronic circuit described with reference to FIGS. 4 to 10.
In FIG. 2 the position and the interconnection of two Hall sensors 6 and 7, which form part of sensor configuration 5 of FIG. 1, is shown three-dimensionally and schematically. Hall sensor 6 has current connections 8 and 9 and Hall sensor 7 has current connections 10 and 11, through which connections a current I flows in the direction indicated. At right angles to the current flow direction of current I the Hall voltages UH1 and UH2 can be tapped at connections 12 and 13 (Hall sensor 6) and at connections 14 and 15 (Hall sensor 7). In this figure the magnetic field lines B of a magnet 2 (cf. FIG. 1) in the section between the opposite connections 12 and 13 and between connections 14 and 15, respectively, indicate field components that lead to a deflection of the charge carriers of current I in the manner known as the Hall effect. The associated potential difference leads to the Hall voltage UH1 between poles or connections 12 and 13 and the Hall voltage UH2 between poles or connections 14 and 15, which can be evaluated in the manner described below. A change in the direction of the field lines B due to rotation by the angle α accordingly results in the fact that the Hall effect in Hall sensors 6 and 7 is influenced differently. This can be used to calculate the angle of rotation α by way of electronic evaluation of the Hall voltages UH1 and UH2.
The two Hall sensors 6 and 7 can therefore be used for evaluation of a magnetic field generated by the rotatable element (magnet 2) in the full 360° range of rotation. For example, Hall sensors 6 and 7 are produced by vertical Hall structures inserted in a silicon semiconductor wafer such that due to their small dimensions in the wafer's planar plane a precise and virtually point-shaped placement of the sensor configuration 5 in the vicinity of the rotatable element is possible, and the sensitivity of the sensor configuration 5 can be increased by means of additional three-dimensional micromechanical structuring. The electronic circuits required for signal conditioning can in this case be advantageously integrated into the same silicon chip as Hall sensors 6 and 7.
FIG. 3 shows the curve of Hall voltage UH1 and Hall voltage UH1 as a function of the angle of rotation α. Here the curve of Hall voltage UH1 as a function of the angle of rotation α follows a sine law and the curve of Hall voltage UH2 follows a cosine law, and this results in the following mathematical relations:
UH1 =C1 ×I1 ×B×cos α, (1)
UH2 =C2 ×I2 ×B×sin α, (2)
where UH1 is the Hall voltage of the Hall sensor 6,
UH2 is the Hall voltage of the Hall sensor 7 that is offset by 90°,
C1 and C2 are material constants of Hall sensors 6 and 7,
B is the magnetic field strength that is perpendicular to the plane of the Hall sensors 6 and 7 (under the condition that the field strength at both Hall sensors 6 and 7 is identical (B1=B2)), and
α is the angle of rotation of the rotating element (magnet 2).
Through combination of the Hall voltages UH1 and UH2, to be brought about in an electronic evaluation circuit, an output voltage UA is produced, which in very good approximation is proportional to the angle of rotation α of the rotatable element 2 (cf. shape of the curve 16 in the righthand portion of FIG. 3). With an appropriate circuit configuration mathematical evaluation can be carried out as follows, for example:
α=arc tan (UH1 /UH2) (3),
by which the angle of rotation α can be determined from the output voltage UA in the evaluation circuit.
FIG. 4 shows as an example a possible embodiment of an evaluation circuit with which the above described angle-of-rotation evaluation can be carried out on the configuration of the invention. Starting with a voltage-regulated oscillator 20 having a low-pass filter 21 downstream, an initial sinusoidal alternating current I1 is then generated, and this current is applied to the current connection 8 of the sensor and has the following time function:
I1 (t)=IO ×sin (ω×t).
A current I2 that is out of phase by 90° and has the time function
I2 (t)=IO ×cos (ω×t)
is applied to the output of a phase delay member 22, and this current is applied to the sensor at its current connection 10. The sensor elements then form a product; the voltages VH1 and VH2, at outputs 12/13 and 14/15, are obtained as follows:
UH1 (t,α)=C1 ×B1 ×cos(Kα)×I1 (t)
and
UH2 (t,α)=C2 ×B2 ×sin(Kα)×I2 (t),
where the constants can be C1 =C2 =C and the field components B1 =B2 =B. α is the angle to be measured, i.e., the angle between the control magnet field and the sensor. The factor K is 1 for Hall sensors and 2 for AMR sensors. Addition of these signals results in a voltage V(t) that is out of phase by Kα with respect to current I1 or I2. In a summing circuit 23 the sum of the two voltages UH1 (t) and UH2 (t) is formed, so that the result according to the following relation and by applying trigonometric formulas is a voltage V(t):
V(t)=UH1 (t)+UH2 (t)
V(t)=C×B×IO ×(cos(Kα)×sin(ω×t)+sin(Kα)×cos(. omega.×t)).
This equation can be transformed into:
V(t)=C×B×IO ×sin(ω×t+Kα),
since in general the following is true:
sin(a+b)=sin(a)×cos(b)+sin(b)×cos(a).
The voltage V(t) is applied to an initial input 24 of a phase comparator 25, to whose second input 26 the output signal (V=const×sin(ω×t)) of the low-pass filter 21 is applied. The output signal of the phase comparator 25 in this case represents a square-wave voltage having the pulse height UO, in accordance with the supply voltage of the phase comparator 25. The pulse duration of the rectangular signal corresponds to the phase difference Kα between the two input voltages, which is proportional to the geometric angle of rotation α that is to be measured. The rectangular signal is smoothed by means of an additional low-pass filter 27 and thus yields the output signal VO, which is proportional to the angle of rotation α of the rotatable shaft 1 shown in FIG. 1.
Therefore a phase comparison of i and V(t) is ultimately carried out and results in the pulse-duration-modulated voltage that is transformed by a low-pass filter into an analog voltage.
Instead of the phase shift of the current, a voltage downstream from the sensor element can also be out of phase by 90°.
The core of the invention is therefore ultimately the utilization of sin(a+b)=sin(a)×cos(b)+sin(b)×cos(a) for evaluation of the signals from sensors that combine supply signals with control signals multiplicatively so that the above expression results.
If the two sensor elements are not triggered by sinusoidal signals but by rectangular signals having the angular frequency ω, then a favorable evaluation possibility results. The rectangular signals have a pulse duty factor of 50% and a phase difference of one-fourth of a period. Such rectangular signals can be generated very easily using flipflops, in which case the phase difference is exactly 90° and the amplitudes are identical. These properties, which are very important for measurement accuracy, can only be achieved in the case of analog sine or cosine signals at rather great cost. With triggering by rectangular signals the two sensor output signals are added in the same way as with triggering by sinusoidal or cosinusoidal signals. The resulting signal has angular frequency components at ω, 3ω, 5ω, etc. Each of these angular frequencies has the phase Kα, -Kα, Kα, . . . as compared with a sinusoidal signal having the corresponding angular frequency. In order for the phase to be measured, one angular frequency such as ω or 3ω must be filtered out of the composite signal. This can be effected by a low-pass filter for the fundamental wave ω or by a bandpass filter for 3ω, after which the phase is measured by means of a phase comparator and an averaging low-pass filter, as already described in the embodiment with sinusoidal excitation.
In FIG. 5 an embodiment having 2 AMR sensor elements offset by 45° and rectangular signal excitation is shown in the form of a block diagram. A device for generating the rectangular signals 28, which in the simplest case comprises 2 delay flipflops, is controlled by a clock generator 29. The clock generator 29 generates a multiple, for example four times the desired rectangular angular frequency ω. The rectangular signal generation thereby provides not only the 0° and the 90° signals with a 50% pulse duty factor but also their complements, i.e., 180° and 270°.
The two sensor elements 30 and 31, rotationally offset by an angle of 45°, are triggered by one push-pull signal each, which is supplied via the "in" inputs. Two downstream difference amplifiers 32 and 33 boost the sensor signals by a factor of 50, for example. The signals formed at the output of difference amplifiers 32 and 33 are added in the summing point 34. In the downstream filter 35 the added signal is filtered such that at the output of the filter 35 a sinusoidal output signal is formed, which is compared with the 0° signal in the phase comparator 36. For this purpose the voltage Up is also fed to the phase comparator 36.
The output signal produced by the phase comparator 36 is fed to a low-pass filter 37. Averaging is carried out in this low-pass filter. If the phase comparator 36 is operated with the externally supplied voltage Up, then the output voltage of the low-pass filter 37 becomes proportional to the voltage Up and to the angle Kα. The output voltage UA at the output of the low-pass filter 37 then exhibits ratiometric behavior similar to the slider voltage in a potentiometer.
The zero stability of the described system shown in FIG. 5 is a function of the temperature sensitivity of the group delay time of the filter and the temperature sensitivity of the oscillator frequency. To reduce this temperature dependence, there are the following possibilities:
1. The temperature sensitivity of the oscillator is set equal to the temperature sensitivity of the group delay time. This can be achieved, for example, by means of identical components in the oscillator and in the filter. Most filter circuits can also be used as oscillators if the amplification is increased accordingly or a separate feedback is provided.
2. Construction of the filter based on switched-capacitor technology (SC technology) and clocking of the filter using the pulse generator. This possibility is represented in the embodiment shown in FIG. 6. The circuit configuration shown in FIG. 6 differs from the circuit configuration shown in FIG. 5 only in the fact that an additional connection exists between the clock generator 29 and the filter 35, which is designed as a SC filter.
Since the limiting frequency of SC filters is a function only of the clock frequency and the clock frequency is a multiple of the rectangular frequency, the temperature sensitivity of the zero is virtually completely eliminated using the circuit configuration shown in FIG. 6.
FIG. 7 shows another embodiment in which there is a second filter 38 that is located between the rectangular signal generating component 28 and the phase comparator 36. The zero-degree rectangular signal is fed to this filter 38. Filters 38 and 35 are identical filters, whereby filter 38 compensates for the temperature sensitivity of the group delay time of filter 35.
FIG. 8 shows a concrete evaluation circuit for a magneto-resistive angle sensor. The structure and function can be explained in detail as follows: a PLL module 39 contains the oscillator, which oscillates at 40 kHz, as well as the phase comparator. Two delay flipflops 40 and 41 form the rectangular signal generating component; the output frequency is 10 kHz. The complementary outputs are connected to the inputs of the AMR angle sensor 42, which comprises two sensor elements that are offset rotationally by 45°, as shown in FIGS. 5 to 7.
A double operational amplifier 43 and 44 acts as the difference amplifier. The sum of the two amplifier output signals reaches the Butterworth 4th-order low-pass filter having a limiting frequency of 10 kHz, which is formed by an operational amplifier 45 together with the associated wiring. An operational amplifier 46 configured as a comparator converts the sinusoidal output signal of the low-pass filter to a rectangular signal, which can be better processed by the phase comparator than a sinusoidal signal. The pulse-duration-modulated output signal can be tapped at Pin 15 of PLL module 39. A direct voltage UA proportional to the angle can be tapped at the analog low-pass output. The voltage supply of the entire circuit is indicated by 47.
Asymmetries in the sensors and in the difference amplifiers can be compensated by potentiometers P1, P2 and P3. P1 compensates amplitude errors between the two channels. P2 and P3 compensate sensor offset errors and crosstalk in the circuit. Replacement of the potentiometers by digitally adjustable networks is possible with circuit integration.
The resistors and capacitors present in the circuit and the necessary voltage supplies and ground connections are not identified in detail in the description; they are shown in the circuit example.
A digital zero balance can be achieved with the circuit configuration shown in FIG. 8. For this purpose a rough zero shift of 45°, 90° or 135° (from a mechanical standpoint) can be effected by feeding the 90°, 180° or 270° signal into the phase comparator instead of the 0° signal. A precision shift is possible by digital or analog delay of one of the two signals that reach the phase comparator. An analog shift can be effected by an all-pass filter, for example, which is advantageously designed using SC technology. The propagation delay time of this all-pass filter can be easily programmed digitally.
A digital shift can be effected by a programmable counter, for example, in which case a relatively high clock frequency must be used in the interest of precision quantization.
The present circuit configuration can also be used to carry out compensation of sensor properties, some of which are temperature-dependent. One temperature-dependent sensor property, for example, is the internal sensor resistance, which is generally a function of temperature. Since the sensor is operated with complementary rectangular signals of constant amplitude, its current consumption is constant over time but temperature-dependent. Since the CMOS flipflop module 40 or 41 has negligible current consumption at a clock frequency of 40 Khz, for example, the current that flows in the supply line of the flipflop is a direct measure of the current in the sensor and consequently of the sensor temperature. From measurement of the sensor's current consumption it is therefore possible to derive temperature-dependent correction signals, which act on the composite signal in just the same way as the potentiometers in FIG. 8.
FIG. 9 shows the block diagram of another embodiment of the invention. In this embodiment the sensor, which comprises the two sensor elements 30 and 31, is operated with direct voltage. The two sensor elements 30 and 31 are located in this case between the direct voltage Us and ground. The resulting output voltages at the two sensor elements 30 and 31 are obtained as:
Va1 (Kα)=C×Us ×cos(Kα)
Va2 (Kα)=C×Us ×sin(Kα)
These output signals are supplied to the two electronic switches 48a and 48b, which have the positions a, b, c and d. Both switches pass periodically through the positions a, b, c, d, a, b, . . . . Let the period of a cycle be T0 and the dwell time per position T0 /4. The switches are controlled by a divider 49, which is clocked by a clock generator 50, via appropriate signals. A downstream difference amplifier 51 thus receives the following input signals in succession:
Va1 (Kα), Va2 (Kα), -Va1 (Kα), -Va2 (Kα).
This periodic signal sequence describes a staircase cosinusoidal voltage Vt sampled with the sampling frequency 4/T0 and having the frequency 1/T0 and the phase -Kα; it can be represented as follows:
Vt =C×Vs ×cos(2π×t/T0 -Kα)
where=0, T0 /4, 2T0 /4, 3T0 /4 . . . .
In the difference amplifier 51 this signal is boosted by a specifiable factor--by 50, for example. The downstream filter 52, which is constructed preferably in switched-capacitor technology, generates from this a sinusoidal output signal that is compared in the phase comparator 36 with the 0° signal, which is also supplied by the divider. The downstream low-pass filter 54 carries out averaging of the pulse-duration-modulated phase measuring signal. If the phase comparator is operated with the externally supplied voltage Up, then the output voltage of the low-pass filter becomes proportional to Up and the angle Kα; the result then once again is ratiometric behavior as in the case of a potentiometer, for example. The switched-capacitor filter is clocked directly by the clock generator 50.
A detailed circuit example is shown in FIG. 10; its essential components are indicated in greater detail in the following. A PLL module 55 contains the oscillator, which oscillates at one megahertz. The PLL module 55 also includes the phase comparator. A frequency divider is indicated by 56 and divides first by 25 and then by 4. The outputs at pins 3 and 13 of the frequency divider thus supply a 20 Khz or 10 Khz switching signal to the two-channel multiplexer 57, to whose inputs the sensor 58 is connected, as described above. Between outputs X and Y is formed the above-mentioned staircase cosinusoidal voltage Vt having the frequency 10 Khz and the sampling frequency 40 Khz; it is amplified by the difference amplifier 53 and 54. Filtering is accomplished in switched-capacitor filter 59, which is clocked at one megahertz from the oscillator. The limiting frequency of the SC filter is one megahertz/100=10 Khz.
As a result of these relationships the voltage at the filter output is purely sinusoidal. A freely available operational amplifier in the SC filter is configured as a comparator which converts the sinusoidal voltage to a square-wave voltage of the same phase. The square-wave voltage is fed to the phase comparator and compared there with the 0° signal (pin 13).
The pulse-duration-modulated output signal can be tapped at pin 15. A direct voltage UA proportional to the angle appears at the analog low-pass output.
The voltage supply of said circuit configuration is shown schematically as circuit 52.
Winner, Hermann, Zabler, Erich, Dukart, Anton, Steinlechner, Siegbert
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10118011, | Aug 04 2003 | VYAIRE MEDICAL 203, INC | Mechanical ventilation system utilizing bias valve |
10274342, | Nov 30 2016 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Rotating sensing device and rotating sensing method |
10275055, | Mar 31 2016 | AZOTEQ HOLDINGS LIMITED | Rotational sensing |
10309801, | Aug 23 2012 | MELEXIS TECHNOLOGIES NV | Arrangement, method and sensor for measuring an absolute angular position using a multi-pole magnet |
10451440, | Nov 28 2013 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Foerderung der Angewandten Forschung E V | Device and method for detecting a position of a position indicator |
10497859, | Jun 06 2016 | MELEXIS TECHNOLOGIES SA | Two-dimensional magnetic field sensor with a single integrated magnetic field concentrator |
10502591, | Nov 24 2014 | MICRO-EPSILON MESSTECHNIK GMBH & CO KG | Sensor arrangement and method for determining a position and/or a change in the position of a measurement object |
10670425, | Mar 30 2018 | NXP B.V.; NXP B V | System for measuring angular position and method of stray field cancellation |
10816363, | Feb 27 2018 | NXP B.V.; NXP B V | Angular sensor system and method of stray field cancellation |
10830612, | Aug 23 2012 | MELEXIS TECHNOLOGIES NV | Arrangement, method and sensor for measuring an absolute angular position using a multi-pole magnet |
11085797, | Nov 01 2018 | Delta Electronics, Inc. | Rotation detecting device, encoder, and motor |
11257643, | Jan 28 2019 | MELEXIS TECHNOLOGIES SA | Magnetic attractive rotary button system |
11326906, | Nov 23 2018 | Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd. | Apparatus for sensing rotating body |
11391601, | Aug 23 2012 | MELEXIS TECHNOLOGIES NV | Arrangement, method and sensor for measuring an absolute angular position using a multi-pole magnet |
11459003, | May 23 2017 | Bombardier Transportation GmbH | Process for detecting a derailment of a rail vehicle |
11486742, | Aug 16 2019 | NXP B.V.; NXP B V | System with magnetic field shield structure |
11592318, | Aug 23 2012 | MELEXIS TECHNOLOGIES NV | Arrangement, method and sensor for measuring an absolute angular position using a multi-pole magnet |
6041336, | Apr 29 1998 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Circuit arrangement for arithmetic combination of an analog signal with a digital value and method and circuit arrangement for determination of an angle |
6064197, | Jul 26 1997 | NXP B V | Angle sensor having lateral magnetic field sensor element and axial magnetic field direction measuring element for determining angular position |
6073713, | Mar 25 1998 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc | Crankshaft position sensing with combined starter alternator |
6118245, | Jun 05 1996 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Control device and control process for motors |
6163746, | Oct 10 1997 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Device for determining a steering angle of a motor vehicle |
6212783, | May 27 1997 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Non-contact system for detecting an angle of rotation |
6244296, | Feb 23 1999 | DEZURIK, INC | Position detection for rotary control valves |
6265864, | Feb 24 1999 | MELEXIS, N V | High speed densor circuit for stabilized hall effect sensor |
6326781, | Jan 11 1999 | BVR Technologies Company | 360 degree shaft angle sensing and remote indicating system using a two-axis magnetoresistive microcircuit |
6355998, | Aug 24 1998 | THORATEC LLC | Sensor arrangement in an electromagnetic rotary drive and a method for the operation of a rotary drive of this kind |
6433535, | Aug 29 1998 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Arrangement for and method of detecting the angle of rotation of a rotatable element |
6441604, | Aug 20 1999 | Yazaki Corporation | Apparatus and method for sensing electric current based on electric signal from magneto-electric conversion element |
6484751, | Feb 23 1999 | DEZURIK, INC | Position detection for rotary control valves |
6571483, | Apr 14 2000 | Gateway, Inc. | Orientation sensor |
6707293, | Nov 15 2001 | Honeywell International Inc | 360-degree rotary position sensor having a magnetoresistive sensor and a hall sensor |
6732440, | Apr 14 2000 | Gateway, Inc. | Orientation sensor |
6771065, | Feb 26 2001 | Woodward Governor Company | Line hall effect detector and method of sensing angular position particularly suited for electrical rotary actuator |
6984072, | Nov 02 2000 | Aktiebolaget SKF | Instrumented bearing for steering wheel |
7064538, | Apr 17 2003 | Dialog Semiconductor GmbH | Magnetic sensor digital processing interface for electrical motor application |
7098653, | Dec 07 2001 | STONERIDGE CONTROL DEVICES, INC | Phase angle determining circuit |
7129698, | Jun 27 2001 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Foerderung der Angewandten Forschung E V | Method and device for preparing a sensor signal of a position sensor for transmission to an evaluation unit |
7205761, | Mar 17 2004 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Rotation state detecting device and rotation state detecting method |
7208940, | Nov 15 2001 | Honeywell International Inc. | 360-Degree magnetoresistive rotary position sensor |
7208941, | Oct 31 2003 | Aisin Seiki Kabushiki Kaisha | Two-wire type current output sensor and IC therefor |
7215115, | Dec 21 2001 | HITACHI ASTEMO, LTD | Module to control a rotating output shaft and module to change a driving condition of vehicle |
7323864, | Jun 06 2003 | Siemens VDO Automotive | Absolute angular position sensor on 360 of a rotating element |
7339370, | Dec 09 2005 | BOURNS, INC | Position and torque sensor |
7385363, | Jul 29 2003 | Rexroth Indramat GmbH | Linear motor having progressive movement control |
7391207, | Aug 06 2004 | Denso Corporation | Rotation angle detector |
7403229, | Aug 17 2004 | RPX Corporation | Testing of miniaturized digital camera modules with electrical and/or optical zoom functions |
7417421, | Jul 03 2001 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | Arrangement for measuring the angular position of an object |
7417424, | Oct 08 2003 | Centre National d Etudes Spatiales | Magnetic-field-measuring device |
7466125, | Jul 12 2004 | Feig Electronic GmbH | Position transmitter and method for determining a position of a rotating shaft |
7477052, | Mar 14 2005 | Continental Automotive Systems US, Inc | Two-pole magnet wheel increment position sensing in an actuator |
7535215, | Apr 07 2004 | Infineon Technologies AG | Apparatus and method for the determination of a direction of an object |
7548058, | Mar 31 2006 | Niles Co., Ltd. | Rotational angel detector with rotational-angle change-amount calculating unit calculating amount of change of absolute rotational angle |
7567078, | Dec 28 2004 | Asahi Kasei EMD Corporation | Magnetic rotation-angle sensor and angle-information processing device |
7714570, | Jun 21 2006 | Allegro MicroSystems, LLC | Methods and apparatus for an analog rotational sensor having magnetic sensor elements |
7719411, | Jun 12 2007 | Robert Bosch GmbH; Robert Bosch LLC; Robert Bosch Corporation | Method and system of transmitting a plurality of movement parameters of a vehicle via a two-wire interface |
7825657, | Mar 02 2004 | Austriamicrosystems AG | Magnetic field sensor and method for the operation thereof |
7911203, | Jun 21 2006 | Allegro MicroSystems, LLC | Sensor having an analog processing module to generate a linear position output |
7936144, | Mar 06 2008 | Allegro MicroSystems, LLC | Self-calibration algorithms in a small motor driver IC with an integrated position sensor |
7994772, | Apr 24 2006 | WIKA ALEXANDER WIEGAND GMBH & CO , KG | Remote transmitter for analogue gauges |
7994774, | Jun 21 2006 | Allegro MicroSystems, LLC | Methods and apparatus for an analog rotational sensor having magnetic sensor elements |
8008911, | Jun 13 2007 | DR ING H C F PORSCHE AG | Method and device for the determination of the road clearance of a vehicle |
8063635, | Oct 23 2006 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | Magnetoresistive sensor with three corners with two wiring connections |
8068182, | Oct 12 2004 | Gula Consulting Limited Liability Company | Multiple frame grabber |
8084969, | Oct 01 2007 | Allegro MicroSystems, LLC | Hall-effect based linear motor controller |
8118024, | Aug 04 2003 | VYAIRE MEDICAL 203, INC | Mechanical ventilation system utilizing bias valve |
8125216, | Jan 04 2008 | Allegro MicroSystems, LLC | Methods and apparatus for angular position sensing using multiple quadrature signals |
8156937, | Aug 04 2003 | VYAIRE MEDICAL 203, INC | Portable ventilator system |
8297279, | Aug 04 2003 | VYAIRE MEDICAL 203, INC | Portable ventilator system |
8390276, | Sep 27 2010 | Bourns Incorporated | Target magnet assembly for a sensor used with a steering gear |
8448528, | Sep 27 2010 | Bourns Incorporated | Three-piece torque sensor assembly |
8522780, | May 18 2004 | VYAIRE MEDICAL 203, INC | Portable ventilator system |
8593136, | Nov 27 2008 | TDK-Micronas GmbH | Measuring apparatus for the detection of a relative movement |
8627819, | Aug 04 2003 | VYAIRE MEDICAL 203, INC | Portable ventilator system |
8664945, | Jul 05 2010 | MELEXIS TECHNOLOGIES NV | Magnetic angle sensor |
8677995, | Aug 04 2003 | VYAIRE MEDICAL 203, INC | Compressor control system for a portable ventilator |
8681274, | Oct 12 2004 | Gula Consulting Limited Liability Company | Multiple frame grabber |
8683997, | Aug 04 2003 | VYAIRE MEDICAL 203, INC | Portable ventilator system |
8716959, | Oct 01 2007 | Allegro MicroSystems, LLC | Hall-effect based linear motor controller |
8749227, | Jun 21 2006 | Allegro MicroSystems, LLC | Methods for an analog rotational sensor having signal inversion |
8807327, | Sep 09 2008 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Transfer apparatus with dynamically variable drive zones |
8872510, | Oct 13 2008 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Device for detecting a rotational angle of a rotatable part |
8884611, | Feb 03 2010 | TDK-Micronas GmbH | Angle sensor and method for determining an angle between a sensor system and a magnetic field |
8890515, | Oct 13 2008 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Device for detecting a rotational angle of a rotatable part |
8933692, | Aug 26 2009 | JTEKT Corporation | Rotation angle detection device |
8988072, | Jul 21 2011 | Infineon Technologies AG | Vertical hall sensor with high electrical symmetry |
9007060, | Jul 21 2011 | Infineon Technologies AG | Electronic device with ring-connected hall effect regions |
9062989, | Dec 15 2010 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | Magnetic field sensor for sensing rotation a reference component about the axis of rotation that is independent of alignment between the axis of rotation and the sensors |
9126002, | Aug 04 2003 | VYAIRE MEDICAL 203, INC | Mechanical ventilation system utilizing bias valve |
9312472, | Feb 20 2012 | Infineon Technologies AG | Vertical hall device with electrical 180 degree symmetry |
9316507, | Dec 21 2012 | Sick AG | Angular encoder and drive system with an angular encoder |
9410790, | Aug 07 2012 | TDK-Micronas GmbH | Method for determining an angle of rotation |
9425386, | Jul 21 2011 | Infineon Technologies AG | Electronic device with ring-connected hall effect regions |
9784594, | Oct 01 2007 | Allegro MicroSystems, LLC | Hall-effect based linear motor controller |
9784801, | Jul 21 2011 | Infineon Technologies AG | Vertical hall sensor with high electrical symmetry |
9825567, | May 06 2014 | JOHNSON ELECTRIC INTERNATIONAL AG | Controller for driving a stepper motor |
9915552, | Nov 19 2013 | Infineon Technologies AG | Perpendicular gradiometric angle sensors, systems and methods |
9995797, | Feb 25 2016 | Senis AG | Angle sensor and method of measuring an angle of a magnetic field |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4791366, | Oct 31 1985 | Alpine Electronics Inc. | Apparatus including a pair of angularly spaced sensors for detecting angle of rotation of a rotary member |
DE9302758, | |||
EP217478B1, | |||
JP56143905, | |||
JP60031005, | |||
JP61274508, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jun 13 1996 | DUKART, ANTON | Robert Bosch GmbH | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 008245 | /0352 | |
Jun 18 1996 | STEINLECHNER, SIEGBERT | Robert Bosch GmbH | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 008245 | /0352 | |
Jun 19 1996 | ZABLER, ERICH | Robert Bosch GmbH | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 008245 | /0352 | |
Jun 21 1996 | WINNER, HERMANN | Robert Bosch GmbH | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 008245 | /0352 | |
Jul 22 1996 | Robert Bosch GmbH | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Aug 22 2002 | M183: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Mar 31 2003 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Aug 25 2006 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Sep 01 2010 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Mar 09 2002 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Sep 09 2002 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 09 2003 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Mar 09 2005 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Mar 09 2006 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Sep 09 2006 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 09 2007 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Mar 09 2009 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Mar 09 2010 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Sep 09 2010 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 09 2011 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Mar 09 2013 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |