A frequency-to-current converter includes several capacitances with capacitive values that are effectively multiplied. After each of a series of periodic pulses, the voltage on a "ramp" capacitance is charged to a starting voltage. Then, during the period preceding the subsequent pulse, the ramp capacitance is allowed to discharge at a discharge rate that is a function of a voltage on a discharge-current bias capacitance. At the end of the period, the voltage on the ramp capacitance is sampled and compared to a reference. If the voltage on the ramp capacitance is too low or too high, indicating a discharge current that is too high or too low, respectively, the bias voltage on the bias capacitance is adjusted to compensate for the error. In another embodiment, a small ramp capacitance is repetitively charged and discharged between two reference voltage levels using alternating charge and discharge current levels. The charge and discharge current levels are related to output current levels so that the rate at which the ramp capacitance transitions between the two reference voltages provides an indication of the output current.

Patent
   5955903
Priority
Feb 02 1996
Filed
Nov 26 1997
Issued
Sep 21 1999
Expiry
Feb 02 2016
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
4
31
all paid
1. A circuit comprising:
a ramp capacitance having a first terminal and a second terminal;
a current source having a first terminal and a second terminal, the first terminal of the current source being connected to the first terminal of the ramp capacitance, the current source for alternately charging and discharging the ramp capacitance; and
a comparator circuit including:
a first input terminal connected to a first reference voltage;
a second input terminal connected to a second reference voltage;
a third input terminal connected to the first terminal of the ramp capacitance; and
an output terminal connected to the second terminal of the current source;
wherein the comparator circuit provides a first output signal on the output terminal when the voltage on the first terminal of the ramp capacitance goes above the first reference voltage, thereby causing the current source to discharge the ramp capacitance, and a second output signal on the output terminal when the voltage on the first terminal of the ramp capacitance goes below the second reference voltage, thereby causing the current source to charge the ramp capacitance.
2. The circuit of claim 1, further comprising a counter having an input terminal connected to the comparator circuit, the counter providing a count representative of the number of times the ramp capacitance is charged and discharged.

This application is a division of application Ser. No. 08/594,676, filed Feb. 2, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,736,879.

The present application is related to application Ser. No. 08/595,812, filed herewith on Feb. 2, 1996, and issued Jun. 16, 1998 as U.S. Pat. No. 5,767,643, entitled "Commutation Delay Generator For Multiphase Brushless DC Motor," by Giao M. Pham, Barry J. Concklin, and James H. Nguyen, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates generally to frequency-to-voltage and frequency-to-current converters.

Frequency-to-current converters are typically implemented by combining a frequency-to-voltage converter and a voltage-to-current converter. In a conventional frequency-to-voltage converter, a one-shot-controlled current reference is averaged by an integrating amplifier. The one-shot and the integrating amplifier each employ rather large capacitances that are difficult to integrate, and are therefore typically provided externally. The remaining circuitry may then be provided as one or more integrated circuits. Many conventional frequency-to-voltage converters are available, several of which are described in the 1994 Applications Handbook available from Burr-Brown of Tucson, Ariz.

An additional problem of conventional frequency-to-voltage converters results from a trade-off between ripple and settling time. High-resolution frequency-to-voltage converters demand low ripple, but decreasing the ripple increases settling time. In practice, the trade-off between settling time and ripple can be improved by filtering the frequency-to-voltage output with a low-pass filter. Unfortunately, such low-pass filters require some additional capacitance, making the frequency-to-voltage converter even more difficult to integrate. Finally, conventional frequency-to-current converters are typically open-loop systems. As such, conventional frequency-to-current converters are sensitive to external disturbances to the output, such as leakage current.

Because of the foregoing problems, there exists a need for a frequency-to-current converter that is insensitive to output disturbances, relies on matched component values to ensure accuracy, and makes use of relatively small, integrable, capacitances.

The present invention addresses the aforementioned needs by providing a closed-loop frequency-to-current converter with integrable capacitances. To accomplish this, a frequency-to-current converter in accordance with the present invention includes several capacitances with capacitive values that are effectively multiplied using inventive capacitance-multiplication techniques.

One method in accordance with the invention allows for the conversion of a periodic series of input pulses to a proportional current without the use of an external capacitance. After each incoming pulse, the voltage on a "ramp" capacitance is reset to a starting voltage. Then, during the period preceding the subsequent pulse, the ramp capacitance is allowed to discharge at a rate that is controlled by a voltage stored across a discharge-current bias capacitance. Next, following the subsequent input pulse, the voltage on the ramp capacitance is sampled for a sample period that is short relative to the period of the pulse train.

During the sample period, the voltage on the ramp capacitance is compared to a fixed reference voltage. If the voltage on the ramp capacitance is lower than the fixed reference voltage, the discharge rate (and therefore the output current) is too high. Conversely, if the voltage on ramp capacitance is higher than the fixed reference voltage, the discharge rate is too low.

When the discharge rate of the ramp capacitance is determined to be either too low or too high, the stored voltage across the discharge-current bias capacitance is adjusted to compensate for the error. For example, if after one period of the input signal the voltage on the ramp capacitance is too high, the voltage on the bias capacitance is elevated to increase the discharge rate of the ramp capacitance for the next period. Once the comparison has been made and the voltage on the bias capacitance adjusted accordingly, the ramp capacitance is reset to the starting voltage and the cycle begins again.

As will be explained in detail below, the sampling technique is beneficial because the technique

1. allows for the use of a much smaller bias capacitance than would otherwise be required to provide a desired time constant,

2. allows a user to change the time constant of the bias capacitance without changing the value of the capacitance, and

3. eliminates the need to adjust the value of the bias capacitance for different input frequencies.

These benefits combined allow the bias capacitance to be integrated.

Another method in accordance with the invention, hereafter referred to as a "folding" technique, allows for the use of a relatively small ramp capacitance to establish the appropriate output current level. In accordance with this method, the small ramp capacitance is repetitively charged and discharged between two reference voltage levels using alternating charge and discharge current levels, each of which is a function of the output current level.

Because the charge and discharge current levels are related to the output current level, the rate at which the ramp capacitance is charged and discharged between the two reference voltages provides an indication of the output current. For example, if the output current is too high, the related charge and discharge currents will also be too high, resulting in relatively rapid charge and discharge rates. And, due to the rapid charge and discharge rates, the number of times the ramp capacitance will charge and discharge over a given period of time will increase in proportion to the increase in output current. Thus, a method in accordance with the invention includes the step of counting the number of times the ramp capacitance charges and discharges over a given period of time to determine whether to increase or decrease the output current.

The inventive folding technique allows for a significant reduction in the size of the ramp capacitance, thereby allowing the ramp capacitance to be easily integrated. Thus, in accordance with the present invention, both the bias capacitance and the ramp capacitance may be advantageously integrated with the other components of the frequency-to-current converter. Moreover, the inventive frequency-to-current converter design takes advantage of the exceptional device matching obtained using integrated circuit technology, as opposed to exact device values, to ensure accurate frequency-to-current conversion.

These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings, where:

FIG. 1 shows a frequency-to-current converter 10 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2 shows various waveforms associated with frequency-to-current converter 10 of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 shows a frequency-to-current converter 50 in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 4 illustrates the concept of "folding" the voltage range applied across a capacitance;

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of one embodiment of folded ramp capacitance 60;

FIG. 6 shows various waveforms associated with a "folded" capacitance;

FIG. 7 shows various waveforms associated with folded ramp capacitance 60;

FIG. 8 shows a frequency-to-current converter 150 in accordance with yet another embodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram of a folded ramp capacitance 160.

FIG. 1 shows a frequency-to-current converter 10 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. Frequency-to-current converter 10 includes a sample timer 12, a ramp circuit 20, a differential transconductance amplifier GM1, a first sample gate 30, a second sample gate 31, and an output current generator 32.

Sample timer 12 is connected to the gate of a transistor 22 within ramp circuit 20 via a reset line RESET, to the control gate of sample gate 30 via a line SAMPLE, and to the control gate of sample gate 31 via a line SAMPLE. Depending on the voltage applied from sample timer 12 to the control terminal of transistor 22, transistor 22 transfers a reference voltage on a terminal VSTART to a terminal of a ramp capacitance CRAMP within ramp circuit 20.

The non-inverting (+) input of transconductance amplifier GM1 is connected to a line VRAMP shared by transistor 22, capacitance CRAMP, and through sample gate 31 to an output of current generator 32. The inverting (-) terminal of transconductance amplifier GM1 is connected to a fixed reference voltage on terminal VFIXED, and the output of transconductance amplifier GM1 is connected to a current-handling terminal of sample gate 30. The other current-handling terminal of sample gate 30 is connected to the control gates of transistors 34 and 36 in current generator 32, and to one terminal of a discharge-current bias capacitance CCB.

Current generator 32 provides an output current IOUT that is proportional to the input frequency of an input signal on a terminal FINPUT, and is therefore inversely proportional to the average period of the input signal on terminal FINPUT. Stated mathematically, ##EQU1## where TINPUT is the average period of e.g. one hundred cycles of the input signal in terminal FINPUT and α is the gain factor of frequency-to-current converter 10.

In the circuit of FIG. 1, output current IOUT is negative (i.e., the current flows into current generator 32). Of course, current generator 32 may also be configured (e.g., using a conventional current mirror) to provide a positive output current IOUT.

Conventional current sources 35 and 37 provide offset currents through transistors 34 and 36, respectively, so that frequency-to-current converter 10 provides some specified offset current when the signal on terminal FINPUT has a frequency of between zero Hz and some selected value. Current sources 35 and 37 each source the same level of current so that the ramp current IRAMP is equal to the output current IOUT Where desired, the offset current can be eliminated or set to zero.

FIG. 2 shows various waveforms associated with frequency-to-current converter 10 of FIG. 1. The timing of the waveforms of FIG. 2 is not to scale. For example, the period TINPUT of the input signal on terminal FINPUT is, in one embodiment, 300 us as compared to the reset period TRES of 1 us and the sample period TSAM of from 100 ns to 800 ns. Sample timer 12 is a conventional timing circuit that, based on its function described herein, may easily be implemented by those of skill in the art.

Referring to the waveforms of FIG. 2 in conjunction with frequency-to-current converter 10 of FIG. 1, sample timer 12 outputs a sample pulse of period TSAM on line SAMPLE in response to an incoming pulse on terminal FINPUT. The sample pulse on line SAMPLE turns on sample gate 30, thereby connecting the output of transconductance amplifier GM1 to a terminal of bias capacitance CCB. During the sample period TSAM, a logic zero on line SAMPLE turns gate 31 off so that the voltage on terminal VRAMP remains constant from e.g. time t1 to time t2.

During the sample period TSAM between times t1 and t2 the voltage on terminal VRAMP is less than the voltage on terminal VFIXED. Thus, transconductance amplifier GM1 will draw charge away from capacitance CCB, thereby decreasing the voltage on the gates of transistors 34 and 36. As a consequence, the current IRAMP through transistor 34 and the output current IOUT through transistor 36 will decrease.

Subsequent to the sample pulse, sample timer 12 outputs a reset pulse of period TRES to the gate of transistor 22 in ramp circuit 20. The reset pulse turns transistor 22 on, charging CRAMP to the reference voltage level on terminal VSTART, as shown in FIG. 2 at time t3.

Once the voltage on terminal VRAMP (and consequently across ramp capacitance CRAMP) has been reset to the reference voltage on terminal VSTART, ramp capacitance CRAMP will discharge through transistor 34 so that the voltage level on terminal VRAMP will decrease to a level VFIN at time t4 when the next input pulse arrives on line 42. Because the voltage VFIN on line VRAMP is below the voltage on terminal VFIXED, during the sample period from t4 to t5 transconductance amplifier GM1 will again draw charge away from bias capacitance CCB, thereby decreasing the voltage on terminal VCCB. This effect is shown in FIG. 2 as the decrease in the voltage VCCB that occurs during the second sample period (from t4 and t5). Having decreased the bias voltage on terminal VCCB, the current through transistors 34 and 36 will also decrease. Thus, capacitance CRAMP will discharge more slowly than during the prior period, as evidenced by the decreased slope of the voltage on terminal VRAMP from time t6 to time t8.

When, as in the third sample period of FIG. 2 (from time t7 to time t8), the finish voltage VFIN on ramp capacitance CRAMP is greater than the voltage on terminal VFIXED, transconductance amplifier GM1 will provide charge to bias capacitance CCB through sample gate 30 during the sample period TSAM, as evidenced by the voltage increase on terminal VCCB from time t7 to time t8.

The above-described closed-loop feedback system will eventually cause the voltage on terminal VRAMP to go from the reference voltage on terminal VSTART to the reference voltage on terminal VFIXED in the period between input pulses. In other words, the voltage level VFIN for the voltage on terminal on VRAMP will equal the voltage level on terminal VFIXED during a sample period TSAM. In such a case, virtually zero current will flow from the output of transconductance amplifier GM1 during the sample period TSAM. This case is illustrated in FIG. 2 between time t10 and time t11.

It is important here, as with conventional feedback systems, that the time constant τCcb of current-bias capacitance CCB be selected to provide a fast response without resulting in instability. The time constant τCcb (measured in units of time) may be calculated as: ##EQU2## where CCcb is the capacitance of current-bias capacitance CCB and gmCcb is the transconductance providing the charge/discharge current for CCB.

The time constant τCcb must be large enough to provide the appropriate response. The time constant τCcb may be increased by decreasing the value of the transconductance gm1 of transconductance amplifier GM1, which provides the charge and discharge currents to capacitance CCB. However, there is a lower limit of gm1 below which noise becomes unacceptably high. Another possibility is to increase the value of capacitive CCcb. Unfortunately, the frequencies of interest (e.g., 1/TINPUT or 3.3 KHz) require a relatively large capacitance that may not be integrated practically.

The present invention overcomes the foregoing problems associated with increasing the time constant τCcb by employing an inventive sample-and-hold technique. Sample timer 12 and sample gate 30 sample and hold the output of transconductance amplifier GM1 so that the transconductance gmCcb input to capacitance CCB is reduced to ##EQU3## Thus, the time constant of CCB, TCcb, is increased to: ##EQU4## As equation (7) makes clear, the "effective" capacitance of CCcb may be expressed as Ceff =CCcb (TINPUT /TSAM) . In other words, the necessary value (and therefore size) of current-bias capacitance CCB is reduced by a factor of TSAM /TINPUT ; accordingly, CCB may be reduced to a integrable size while maintaining the appropriate time constant τCcb.

Without the inventive sample-and-hold technique, the value of CCB would have to be adjustable to allow for different input frequencies. Fortunately, the inventive sample-and-hold technique eliminates the need to provide a variable capacitance. Substituting 1/TINPUT in equation (6) with the input frequency fINPUT shows that the time constant τCcb of bias capacitance CCB is a function of the input frequency fINPUT. Stated mathematically, ##EQU5##

Thus, using the sample-and-hold technique that samples for a fixed time period TSAM and a fixed capacitance Cccb, the time constant τCcb automatically changes with changes in the input frequency fINPUT.

FIG. 3 shows a frequency-to-current converter 50 in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention. To the extent that FIG. 3 is similar to FIG. 1, similar reference numbers are used. Frequency-to-current converter 50 functions in substantially the same way as described above in connection with FIGS. 1 and 2. However, in frequency-to-current converter 50, ramp capacitance CRAMP is replaced by a folded ramp capacitance 60. For simplicity, the optional offset current sources 35 and 37 are not shown in FIG. 3.

In accordance with the embodiment of FIG. 3, ramp capacitance CRAMP is replaced by a folded ramp capacitance 60. As explained below, the process of "folding" allows for the use of a relatively small value of ramp capacitance CRAMP, resulting in easier, more economical, integration. Folded ramp capacitance 60 receives as inputs a reference voltage on terminal VMAX and a second reference voltage on a terminal VMIN, the voltages on terminals VMAX and VMIN being e.g. 5 volts and 1 volt, respectively. In one embodiment, terminals VMAX and terminal VREF are connected so that the reference voltage on terminal VREF also serves as the reference voltage on terminal VMAX.

Capacitance 60 outputs a signal "UNDER" on a line 62 to an input of a transconductance amplifier GM2. Transconductance amplifier GM2 is configured to operate as a conventional differential amplifier when a logic zero (e.g., zero volts) is applied on line 62, and to output its maximum positive output current, regardless of the levels on its differential input terminals (+ and -), when a logic one (e.g., 5 volts) is applied on line 62.

The following explanation describes the concept of "folding" in general, which may be used to increase the time constant of a given capacitance C. In the general case, for a given capacitance C with a constant charging current IC, the time constant τC is proportional to the product of the change in voltage ΔV and the capacitance C divided by the current IC. This relationship may be expressed mathematically as: ##EQU6## Thus, for a given time constant τC, the necessary value of the capacitance C, and thus the physical area required to integrate such a capacitance, may be minimized by either increasing ΔV or decreasing the current IC.

Unfortunately, there is a lower limit to the level of current IC used to charge the capacitance C, for when the current is too low, noise and leakage produce unacceptably poor accuracy in defining the time constant τC. Moreover, it is not practical to substantially increase the power supply voltages for integrated circuits to increase the effect of capacitance of a particular capacitance on the integrated circuit. For these reasons, Applicant invented a folding technique that allows for an effective increase in the voltage change ΔV across ramp capacitance CRAMP without requiring increased voltage potentials. According to this aspect of the invention, the desired voltage range is "folded" into a number of smaller voltage ranges.

FIG. 4 illustrates the concept of "folding" the voltage range applied across a capacitance. Paths P1 and P2 are discharge paths similar to the VRAMP discharge paths between times t3 and t4, between times t6 and t7, and between times t9 and t10 of FIG. 2. Path P1 shows the voltage across capacitance C discharging at a constant current IC from 5 volts to -11 volts (for a total ΔV of 16 volts) over a time period T. Path P2 shows the voltage across capacitance C discharging at a reduced constant current IC ' so that during the period T the capacitance C discharges from 5 volts to -9 volts, for a total ΔV of only 14 volts. Assuming that the current used to produce path P1 is the desired current, the voltage difference between path P1 and path P2 at the end of period T (i.e., the error voltage Vε of 2 volts) may then be used to provide feedback to transconductance amplifier GM2 in the manner described above in connection with transconductance amplifier GM1.

According to the inventive folding technique, the 16-volt range of path P1 may be folded into a number of segments. For example, FIG. 4 shows path P1 folded into a path P1 ', which includes four segments, two decreasing and two increasing. The folded path P1 ' represents a voltage change ΔV having an absolute value of 16 volts (i.e., four 4-volt changes) without exceeding 5 volts or going below 1 volt. Similar to path P1, path P2 may folded into e.g. four segments, two decreasing and two increasing, as shown using path P2 '. Importantly, at the end of period T the folded waveform P2 ' is off by an error voltage VεF of the same magnitude as the error voltage Vε separating paths P1 and P2.

The error voltage VεF may be used to provide feedback for transconductance amplifier GM2. Note that the error voltage VεF is of the opposite polarity of the voltage Vε. For this reason, the inverting and non-inverting (- and +) terminals of transconductance amplifier GM2 are reversed in the embodiment of FIGS. 3 and 5 as compared to the terminals of transconductance amplified GM1 of FIG. 1. This and other aspects of the embodiment of FIG. 3 are described below in detail in connection with FIGS. 5 and 6.

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of one embodiment of folded ramp capacitance 60. Folded ramp capacitance 60 includes ramp capacitance CRAMP, a comparator circuit 70, a counter 80, and a current source 90.

Current source 90 receives the ramp current IRAMP on line 92 from current generator 32 through sample gate 31. The ramp current IRAMP is mirrored by transistors 94 and 96 to provide a current IRAMP ' substantially equal to the ramp current IRAMP through series-connected transistors 98 and 100. Transistors 102 and 104 conventionally mirror transistors 98 and 100 so that the current IRAMP ' travels through series-connected transistors 96, 98, and 100, and through series-connected transistors 106, 102, and 104. A transistor 108 mirrors transistor 106 so that a current IC substantially equal to the current IRAMP ' through transistor 106 is conducted by the current-handling terminals of transistor 108. Finally, a current source 110, which includes a transistor 112 and a transistor 114, is biased by the combination of transistors 102 and 104.

The pair of transistors 112 and 114 is similar to transistors 102 and 104, except that transistors 112 and 114 have a multiplication factor M of two. Because of the multiplication factor, current source 110 conducts twice as much current for a given bias voltage on the base of transistor 112 as the series connected transistors 102 and 104 (and consequently twice as much current as the current IC through transistor 108). With this configuration, when transistor 114 is off, the folded ramp current IF from current source 90 is substantially equal to IC. Conversely, when transistor 114 is conducting, current source 110 conducts a current substantially equal to twice IC so that the folded ramp current IF is equal to IC -2IC =-IC. Thus, the folded ramp current IF may be used to alternately charge and discharge ramp capacitance CRAMP at rates of IC and -IC, respectively, the direction of folded ramp current IF depending on whether transistor 114 is on or off.

Comparator circuit 70 receives the folded ramp current IF on an input line 71. Referring to FIGS. 4 and 5, path P1 ' will be used to explain the operation of comparator circuit 70, where the path P1 ' represents the changing voltage level on terminal VRAMP of FIGS. 3 and 5.

Referring to FIG. 5, if we assume that the reset terminal RESET of counter 80 was just supplied a positive (e.g., 12-volt) pulse, the voltage on terminal VRAMP will be reset to 5 volts, as shown at the Y axis of FIG. 4. And, if we assume that the folded ramp current IF from current source 90 is equal to -IC (i.e., that transistor 114 is biased on), the voltage on terminal VRAMP will begin to discharge as shown in FIG. 4 as element A.

Comparator circuit 70 includes a maximum-voltage comparator 72, a minimum-voltage comparator 74, a reset transistor 76, and a conventional cross-coupled latch 78. When the voltage on terminal VRAMP on the ramp capacitance CRAMP discharges below VMIN, comparator 74 will output a logic one to latch 78, which will consequently output a logic zero to an input of an AND gate 84. For the time being, assume that other input to AND gate 84 from line 62 is a logic one, so that the logic zero from latch 78 will cause AND gate 84 to output a logic zero to the gate of transistor 114, turning transistor 114 off.

With transistor 114 off, the folded ramp current IF from current source 90 will change from -IC to +IC, the current through transistor 108. As shown in FIG. 4 as leg B of path P1 ', the folded ramp current IF will begin to charge the ramp capacitance CRAMP, thereby increasing the voltage on terminal VRAMP.

Next, when the voltage on terminal VRAMP exceeds the voltage on terminal VMAX (5 volts in this case), comparator 72 will output a logic one to latch 78 causing latch 78 to output a logic one to transistor 114. As a result, transistor 114 and transistor 112 will conduct twice as much current (2IC) as transistor 108 (IC), so that the folded ramp current IF of current source 90 will return to -IC. Ramp capacitance CRAMP will consequently begin to discharge, resulting in the steady decrease in the voltage on terminal VRAMP shown as leg C of path P1 ' in FIG. 4.

As long as there is an ramp current IRAMP through line 92, there will be a folded ramp current IF that is either charging or discharging ramp capacitance CRAMP. In the case of path P1 ', the voltage on terminal VRAMP of ramp capacitance CRAMP is shown to discharge to 1 volt twice (legs A and C) and charge to 5 volts twice (legs B and D).

Counter 80 is connected to comparator circuit 70 on line UNDER-- L, which stands for "under low," indicating that the voltage on terminal VRAMP is under the minimum voltage on terminal VMIN. The under-low pulses on line UNDER-- L to counter 80 allow counter 80 to count the number of times the changing ramp voltage on terminal VRAMP transitions from negative-going to positive-going, thereby providing an indication of the number of "folds." Once the count received by counter 80 goes above a predetermined number, counter 80 outputs a logic zero on output line 62 to transconductance amplifier GM2 and to AND gate 84.

FIG. 6 is similar to FIG. 4 in that FIG. 6 illustrates an example where the voltage across ramp capacitance CRAMP is folded four times. The voltage VRAMP on ramp capacitance CRAMP transitions from 5 volts to 1 volt and then from 1 volt to 5 volts as described above in connection with FIG. 4. Each time the voltage transitions from negative-going to positive-going, comparator 74 of comparator circuit 70 outputs a positive pulse on line UNDER-- L. This positive pulse increments the count stored in counter 80.

In the example of FIG. 6, counter 80 is configured to output a logic zero on line 62 only after the count is equal to two. In other words, as long as the count is "under" two, counter 80 will output a logic one as the signal UNDER on line 62.

If the ramp current IRAMP is far too low for a given input frequency, the folded ramp current IF of current source 90 will also be too low. In such a case, counter 80 will not reach a count of two during one period of the input signal. In such a case, counter 80 will output a logic one on line 62, which will deactivate GM2 so that GM2 will not respond to its positive and negative inputs, but will instead output its maximum output current of, for example, 10 uA. Thus, when the output current IOUT is far low than is appropriate for a given input frequency, transconductance amplifier GM2 outputs a maximum current to charge bias capacitance CCB.

As the value of the output current IOUT (and therefore the ramp current IRAMP) increases to more accurately reflect the input frequency, the transition time of the ramp voltage on terminal VRAMP will continue to decrease until the counter reaches a count of two prior to the end of one period TINPUT of the input signal. This case is shown in FIG. 6. Once counter 80 reaches a count of two, counter 80 outputs a zero on line 62, which activates transconductance amplifier GM2. Transconductance amplifier GM2 than responds to its inverting and non-inverting inputs. The active region of transconductance amplifier GM2 is illustrated in FIG. 6 as "GM2 active."

Once GM2 is active, frequency-to-current converter 50 works in substantially the same way as described above in connection with frequency-to-converter 10. If at the end of the period TINPUT of the input signal the ramp voltage on terminal VRAMP is higher than the reference voltage on terminal VMAX, transconductance amplifier GM2 draws some charge from bias capacitance CCB during the sample period TSAM, thus decreasing the ramp current IRAMP (and consequently decreasing the folded ramp current IF). Conversely, if GM2 is in the active region and the ramp voltage on terminal VRAMP is below the reference voltage on terminal VMAX at the end of the period TINPUT, then the active transconductance amplifier GM2 will output current to charge bias capacitance CCB through sample gate 30 during the sample period TSAM.

Using a folding factor of four, the embodiment described in connection with FIG. 6 increases the effective capacitance of ramp capacitance CRAMP by a factor of four. Of course, the voltage across ramp capacitance CRAMP can be folded any number of times. For example, FIG. 7 shows various waveforms associated with folded ramp capacitance 60 in an embodiment that multiplies the total voltage change across ramp capacitance CRAMP by thirty-two times.

During the sample period TSAM of FIG. 7, the voltage on terminal VRAMP is slightly less than the reference voltage on terminal VMAX. As a result, transconductance amplifier GM2 provides an output current to bias capacitance CCB, thereby increasing the bias voltage on terminal VCCB. Then, during the subsequent reset pulse, the positive reset voltage on the gate of transistor 76 of comparator circuit 70 (see FIG. 5) resets the voltage on terminal VRAMP to the voltage on terminal VMAX. Once reset, the voltage VRAMP transitions back and fourth between the voltage on terminal VMAX and the voltage on terminal VMIN approximately 32 times before the next sample pulse.

In the case of FIG. 7, counter 80 would be configured to activate GM2 after a count of 16. If counter 80 did not sense 16 negative to positive transitions between input pulses, counter 80 would output a logic one on line 62, indicating that the count was "under," causing transconductance amplifier GM2 to output the maximum available current to bias capacitance CCB.

If the folded ramp current IF were far too high relative to the input frequency, the transitions of the ramp voltage on terminal VRAMP would occur far more rapidly, causing counter 80 to reach its maximum count and activate transconductance amplifier GM2 well before the end of the period TINPUT. When this happens, the signal from counter 80 on line 62 goes low, causing AND gate 84 to disable transistor 114, consequently disabling the folding action of folded ramp capacitance 60. As a result, the voltage on terminal VRAMP will continue to climb beyond the reference voltage on terminal VMAX (to a maximum voltage of e.g. 4 volts above VMAX, or 9 volts), as shown in FIG. 6. Transconductance amplifier GM2 will then output a current to decrease the ramp current IRAMP in much the same way as described above in connection with FIG. 3. After a number of periods of the input signal, the final voltage on terminal of VRAMP after a single input period TINPUT will be precisely equal to the voltage on terminal VMAX.

FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of yet another embodiment of the present invention--frequency-to-current converter 150--wherein the settling time of the output current IOUT is improved by the addition of a variable current generator 200 and associated circuitry. The schematic of FIG. 8 is similar to that of FIG. 3, like elements having the same reference numbers.

A folded ramp capacitance 160 is connected to a transconductance amplifier GM3 via a GM-enable line GM-- EN and to current generator 200 via a current-select bus ISEL, which includes lines CNT<8, 8≦CNT<12, 12≦CNT<16, 17<CNT≦20, and CNT>20 (shown in FIG. 9).

FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram of a folded ramp capacitance 160 that is similar to folded ramp capacitance 60 of FIG. 5, like elements having the same reference numbers. When the count stored in a counter 180 is less than eight, counter 180 outputs a logic one on line CNT<8 of bus ISEL. Similarly, when the stored count is from eight to eleven, twelve to fifteen, eighteen to twenty, or greater than twenty-one, counter 180 outputs a logic one on the corresponding one of lines 8≦CNT<12, 12≦CNT<16, 17<CNT≦20, and CNT>20, respectively. When the stored count is sixteen or seventeen, a logic one on line GM-- EN enables transconductance amplifier GM3 to function in the active mode, as described above for transconductance amplifier GM2 in connection with FIG. 6.

Current generator 200 of FIG. 8 is conventionally configured to output a current of:

1. 1 mA when the voltage on line CNT<8 represents a logic one;

2. 100 μA when the voltage on line 8≦CNT<12 represents a logic one;

3. 10 μA when the voltage on line 12≦CNT<16 represents a logic one;

4. -100 μA when the voltage on line 17<CNT≦20 represents a logic one; and

5. -1 mA when the voltage on line CNT>20 represents a logic one.

Thus configured, the current used to charge and discharge bias capacitance CCB in frequency-to-current converter 150 varies depending on the count stored in counter 180. That is, when the voltage on terminal VCCB is relatively far from that required to provide the correct output current IOUT, the charge or discharge current used to correct the voltage on terminal VCCB is increased. Then, as the voltage on terminal VCCB approaches the appropriate fixed voltage VFIXED during the sample period TSAM, the charge or discharge current decreases. In this way, frequency-to-current converter 150 improves the settling time of ramp current IRAMP while maintaining stability.

Frequency-to-current converters in accordance with the present invention are not limited to the particular applications described above. For example, in one embodiment, sample gate 31 of FIG. 3 is eliminated by connecting line SAMPLE directly to the gate of transistor 104 and, through an additional input (not shown) of AND gate 84, to the gate of transistor 114. Furthermore, frequency-to-current converters that do not require the level of precision provided by the "active" analog mode of the second embodiment could rely only on the count stored in counter 80 to determine the output current level. Therefore, the scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of the preferred versions described herein.

Pham, Giao Minh

Patent Priority Assignee Title
6125288, Mar 14 1996 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Telecommunication apparatus capable of controlling audio output level in response to a background noise
6501411, May 03 2001 Texas Instruments Incorporated System and method for optimizing power in pipelined data converters
6838787, Jan 16 2002 OmniVision Technologies, Inc Variable bandwidth correlated doubling sampling circuits for image sensors
9136831, Jul 05 2011 INDIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, BOMBAY Frequency to voltage converter
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4215315, Oct 13 1978 John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc. Low frequency signal period or ratio (period)-to-voltage converter
4225796, Feb 14 1978 Nippondenso Co., Ltd. Frequency-to-current conversion circuit
4250435, Jan 04 1980 General Electric Company Clock rate control of electronically commutated motor rotational velocity
4275343, Dec 28 1978 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Back EMF controlled permanent magnet motor
4394610, Aug 07 1981 The United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the Adaptive reference voltage generator for firing angle control of line-commutated inverters
4401934, Aug 07 1981 The United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the Adaptive control system for line-commutated inverters
4455513, Jul 26 1982 PS HOLDING CORPORATION, A CORP OF CA; IMEC Corporation Self-starting transducerless, brushless D.C. motor controller
4513230, Jun 24 1974 General Electric Company Laundering apparatus, method of operating a laundry machine, control system for an electronically commutated motor, and method of operating an electronically commutated motor
4540906, Mar 09 1984 Synektron Corporation Stator assembly for permanent magnet rotary device
4575652, Sep 27 1984 Synektron Corporation Permanent magnet motor having high starting torque and narrowly-defined detent zones
4642537, Dec 13 1983 General Electric Company Laundering apparatus
4656400, Jul 08 1985 SAE MAGNETICS H K LTD , A HONG KONG CORP Variable reluctance actuators having improved constant force control and position-sensing features
4659969, Aug 09 1984 SYNEKIRON CORPORATION Variable reluctance actuator having position sensing and control
4665348, Aug 09 1984 Synektron Corporation Method for sensing and controlling the position of a variable reluctance actuator
4673849, Oct 10 1986 Allied Corporation Permanent magnet motor closed loop restarting system
4743815, Sep 01 1987 EMERSON ELECTRIC CO , A CORP OF MO Brushless permanent magnet motor system
4751459, Sep 18 1986 Synektron Corporation Magnetic tachometer or accelerometer having highly permeable eddy current flux circuit
4757241, Oct 19 1987 General Electric Company PWM system for ECM motor
4774428, May 15 1987 SAE MAGNETICS HK LTD Compact three-phase permanent magnet rotary machine having low vibration and high performance
4823091, Dec 02 1986 Thomson Semiconducteurs Frequency-voltage converter
4965578, Oct 21 1987 Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique High dynamic analog to digital counter
5015939, Aug 10 1990 SAE MAGNETICS HK LTD Control circuit for switched reluctance motor
5034668, Dec 04 1989 SAE MAGNETICS HK LTD Control circuit for an electric motor
5196741, Jan 25 1989 Agilent Technologies Inc Recycling ramp interpolator
5258695, Dec 19 1990 MOBILE STORAGE TECHNOLOGY INC Spin motor control system for a hard disk assembly
5272803, Feb 05 1993 SAE MAGNETICS HK LTD Method and apparatus for electric motor assembly with bearing preload
DE2117599,
DE2254363,
EP92258,
FR2281677,
WO8400087,
///////////////////////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Nov 26 1997Siliconix Incorporated(assignment on the face of the patent)
Feb 12 2010VISHAY SPRAGUE, INC , SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO VISHAY EFI, INC AND VISHAY THIN FILM, LLCCOMERICA BANK, AS AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0240060515 pdf
Feb 12 2010VISHAY DALE ELECTRONICS, INC COMERICA BANK, AS AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0240060515 pdf
Feb 12 2010Vishay Intertechnology, IncCOMERICA BANK, AS AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0240060515 pdf
Feb 12 2010Siliconix IncorporatedCOMERICA BANK, AS AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0240060515 pdf
Feb 12 2010VISHAY MEASUREMENTS GROUP, INC COMERICA BANK, AS AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0240060515 pdf
Dec 01 2010COMERICA BANK, AS AGENT, A TEXAS BANKING ASSOCIATION FORMERLY A MICHIGAN BANKING CORPORATION VISHAY DALE ELECTRONICS, INC , A DELAWARE CORPORATIONRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0254890184 pdf
Dec 01 2010COMERICA BANK, AS AGENT, A TEXAS BANKING ASSOCIATION FORMERLY A MICHIGAN BANKING CORPORATION VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY, INC , A DELAWARE CORPORATIONRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0254890184 pdf
Dec 01 2010COMERICA BANK, AS AGENT, A TEXAS BANKING ASSOCIATION FORMERLY A MICHIGAN BANKING CORPORATION SILICONIX INCORPORATED, A DELAWARE CORPORATIONRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0254890184 pdf
Dec 01 2010COMERICA BANK, AS AGENT, A TEXAS BANKING ASSOCIATION FORMERLY A MICHIGAN BANKING CORPORATION VISHAY MEASUREMENTS GROUP, INC , A DELAWARE CORPORATIONRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0254890184 pdf
Dec 01 2010COMERICA BANK, AS AGENT, A TEXAS BANKING ASSOCIATION FORMERLY A MICHIGAN BANKING CORPORATION VISHAY GENERAL SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC, F K A GENERAL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC , A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANYRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0254890184 pdf
Dec 01 2010COMERICA BANK, AS AGENT, A TEXAS BANKING ASSOCIATION FORMERLY A MICHIGAN BANKING CORPORATION VISHAY VITRAMON, INCORPORATED, A DELAWARE CORPORATIONRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0254890184 pdf
Dec 01 2010COMERICA BANK, AS AGENT, A TEXAS BANKING ASSOCIATION FORMERLY A MICHIGAN BANKING CORPORATION VISHAY SPRAGUE, INC , SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO VISHAY EFI, INC AND VISHAY THIN FILM, LLC, A DELAWARE CORPORATIONRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0254890184 pdf
Dec 01 2010COMERICA BANK, AS AGENT, A TEXAS BANKING ASSOCIATION FORMERLY A MICHIGAN BANKING CORPORATION YOSEMITE INVESTMENT, INC , AN INDIANA CORPORATIONRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0254890184 pdf
Dec 01 2010Vishay Intertechnology, IncJPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0256750001 pdf
Dec 01 2010VISHAY DALE ELECTRONICS, INC JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0256750001 pdf
Dec 01 2010Siliconix IncorporatedJPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0256750001 pdf
Dec 01 2010VISHAY SPRAGUE, INC JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0256750001 pdf
Jul 16 2019JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTVISHAY SPRAGUE, INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0498260312 pdf
Jul 16 2019JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTVISHAY DALE ELECTRONICS, INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0498260312 pdf
Jul 16 2019JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTDALE ELECTRONICS, INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0498260312 pdf
Jul 16 2019JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTVishay Intertechnology, IncRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0498260312 pdf
Jul 16 2019JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTSprague Electric CompanyRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0498260312 pdf
Jul 16 2019JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTVISHAY VITRAMON, INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0498260312 pdf
Jul 16 2019JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTVISHAY EFI, INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0498260312 pdf
Jul 16 2019JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTVishay Techno Components, LLCRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0498260312 pdf
Jul 16 2019JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTSiliconix IncorporatedRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0498260312 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Jan 27 2003ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Mar 20 2003M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Apr 09 2003REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Mar 21 2007M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Mar 21 2011M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Sep 21 20024 years fee payment window open
Mar 21 20036 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Sep 21 2003patent expiry (for year 4)
Sep 21 20052 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Sep 21 20068 years fee payment window open
Mar 21 20076 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Sep 21 2007patent expiry (for year 8)
Sep 21 20092 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Sep 21 201012 years fee payment window open
Mar 21 20116 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Sep 21 2011patent expiry (for year 12)
Sep 21 20132 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)