|
1. A method for separating a mixture of conjugated linoleic acids which comprises distilling a mixture of conjugated linoleic acids in the presence of an azeotropic forming agent, recovering 1- conjugated linoleic and the azeotrope forming agent as overhead product and obtaining the 2- conjugated linoleic acid as bottoms product, wherein said azeotrope forming agent consists essentially of one material selected from the group consisting of propiophenone, ethyl acetate, butyraldehyde, butyl ether and 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone.
|
This invention relates to a method for separating conjugated linoleic acids
by azeotropic distillation.
Azeotropic distillation is the method of separating close boiling compounds
or azeotropes from each other be carrying out the distillation in a
multiplate rectification column in the presence of an added liquid, said
liquid forming an azeotrope with one or more of the compounds to be
separated. Its presence on each plate of the rectification column alters
the relative volatility in a direction to make the separation on each
plate greater and thus require either fewer plates to effect the same
separation or make possible a greater degree of separation with the same
number of plates. The azeotrope forming agent is introduced with the feed
to a continuous column. The azeotrope forming agent and the more volatile
component are taken off as overhead product and the less volatile
component comes off as bottoms product. The usual methods of separating
the azeotrope former from the more volatile component are cooling and
phase separation or solvent extraction.
The usual method of evaluating the effectiveness of azeotropic distillation
agents is the change in relative volatility of the compounds to be
separated. Table 1 shows the degree of separation or purity obtainable by
theoretical plates at several relative volatilities. Table 1 shows that a
relative volatility of at least 1.2 is required to get an effective
separation by rectification.
TABLE 1
|
______________________________________
|
Effect of Relative Volatility on Theoretical Stage
|
Requirements.
|
Separation Purity,
|
Relative Volatility
|
Both Products
|
1.02 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 2.0 3.0
|
(Mole Fraction)
|
Theoretical Stages at Total Reflux
|
______________________________________
|
0.999 697 144 75 52 40 33 19 12
|
0.995 110 57 3934
|
30 25 14 9
|
0.990 95 49 3463
|
26 22 12 7
|
0.98 81 42 29392
|
22 18 10 6
|
0.95 61 31 21296
|
16 14 8 4
|
0.90 45 23 16221
|
12 10 5 3
|
______________________________________
|
Conjugated linoleic acids boil only one degree apart and have a relative
volatility of 1.05 which makes it impossible to separate them by
conventional distillation or rectification. Table 2 shows that with an
agent giving a relative volatility of 1.26, only 52 actual plates are
required to get 99% purity.
TABLE 2
|
______________________________________
|
Theoretical And Actual Plates Required vs. Relative
|
Volatility For Conjugated Linoleic Acids Sepatation
|
Relative
|
Theoretical Plates Required
|
Actual Plates
|
Volatilty
|
At Total Reflux, 99% Purity
|
Required, 75% Efficiency
|
______________________________________
|
1.14 70 94
|
1.16 62 83
|
1.26 40 53
|
1.27 39 52
|
______________________________________
|
The object of this invention is to provide a process or method of
azeotropic distillation that will enhance the relative volatility of
conjugated linoleic acids in their separation in a rectification column.
It is a further object of this invention to identify effective azeotropic
distillation agents that are stable and can be recycled.
The objects of this invention are provided by a process for the separation
of conjugated linoleic acids which entails the use of certain organic
compounds when employed as the agent in azeotropic distillation.
TABLE 3
|
______________________________________
|
Effective Azeotropic Distillation Agents For
|
Separatuin Of Conjugated Linoleic Acids By
|
Relative
|
______________________________________
|
Volatility
|
None 1.05
|
Ethyl acetoacetate 1.14
|
Propiophenone 1.16
|
Butyraldehyde 1.26
|
Butyl ether 1.25
|
1-Methyl-2-pyrrolidinone
|
1.25
|
______________________________________
|
Example 1; Fifty grams of conjugated linoleic acids mixture and fifty grams
of butyl ether as the azeotropic forming agent were charged to a
vapor-liquid equilibrium still and refluxed for two hours. The vapor
composition was 50% 1-conjugated linoleic acid, 50% 2-conjugated linoleic
acid; the liquid composition was 55.6% 1-conjugated linoleic and 44.4%
2-conjugated acid. This is a relative volatility of 1.25.
Berg, Lloyd, Brix, Terry
Patent |
Priority |
Assignee |
Title |
6809115, |
Sep 21 2000 |
NUTRITION 21, LLC |
METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF DIABETES, THE REDUCTION OF BODY FAT, IMPROVEMENT OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY, REDUCTION OF HYPERGLYCEMIA, AND REDUCTION OF HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA WITH CHROMIUM COMPLEXES, CONJUGATED FATTY ACIDS, AND/OR CONJUGATED FATTY ALCOHOLS |
Patent |
Priority |
Assignee |
Title |
4874473, |
Apr 25 1986 |
Bayer Aktiengesellschaft |
Separation of diastereomers by extractive distillation |
5391264, |
Mar 14 1994 |
Lloyd, Berg |
Separation of alpha-Phellandrene from d-limonene by azeotropic distillation |
5582693, |
Jan 11 1996 |
Lloyd, Berg |
Separation of 3-carene and limonene by azeotropic distillation |
5698080, |
Nov 22 1996 |
|
Separation of phellandrene from limonene by azeotropic distillation |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Date |
Maintenance Fee Events |
Aug 20 2003 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Feb 02 2004 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date |
Maintenance Schedule |
Feb 01 2003 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Aug 01 2003 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 01 2004 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Feb 01 2006 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Feb 01 2007 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Aug 01 2007 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 01 2008 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Feb 01 2010 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Feb 01 2011 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Aug 01 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 01 2012 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Feb 01 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |