conjugated linoleic acids cannot be separated by distillation or rectification because of the closness of their boiling points. conjugated linoleic acids can be separated by azeotropic distillation. Effective agents are butyraldehyde, butyl ether and 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone.

Patent
   6019874
Priority
Jan 19 1999
Filed
Jan 19 1999
Issued
Feb 01 2000
Expiry
Jan 19 2019
Assg.orig
Entity
Small
1
4
EXPIRED
1. A method for separating a mixture of conjugated linoleic acids which comprises distilling a mixture of conjugated linoleic acids in the presence of an azeotropic forming agent, recovering 1-conjugated linoleic and the azeotrope forming agent as overhead product and obtaining the 2-conjugated linoleic acid as bottoms product, wherein said azeotrope forming agent consists essentially of one material selected from the group consisting of propiophenone, ethyl acetate, butyraldehyde, butyl ether and 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone.

This invention relates to a method for separating conjugated linoleic acids by azeotropic distillation.

Azeotropic distillation is the method of separating close boiling compounds or azeotropes from each other be carrying out the distillation in a multiplate rectification column in the presence of an added liquid, said liquid forming an azeotrope with one or more of the compounds to be separated. Its presence on each plate of the rectification column alters the relative volatility in a direction to make the separation on each plate greater and thus require either fewer plates to effect the same separation or make possible a greater degree of separation with the same number of plates. The azeotrope forming agent is introduced with the feed to a continuous column. The azeotrope forming agent and the more volatile component are taken off as overhead product and the less volatile component comes off as bottoms product. The usual methods of separating the azeotrope former from the more volatile component are cooling and phase separation or solvent extraction.

The usual method of evaluating the effectiveness of azeotropic distillation agents is the change in relative volatility of the compounds to be separated. Table 1 shows the degree of separation or purity obtainable by theoretical plates at several relative volatilities. Table 1 shows that a relative volatility of at least 1.2 is required to get an effective separation by rectification.

TABLE 1
______________________________________
Effect of Relative Volatility on Theoretical Stage
Requirements.
Separation Purity,
Relative Volatility
Both Products
1.02 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 2.0 3.0
(Mole Fraction)
Theoretical Stages at Total Reflux
______________________________________
0.999 697 144 75 52 40 33 19 12
0.995 110 57 3934
30 25 14 9
0.990 95 49 3463
26 22 12 7
0.98 81 42 29392
22 18 10 6
0.95 61 31 21296
16 14 8 4
0.90 45 23 16221
12 10 5 3
______________________________________

Conjugated linoleic acids boil only one degree apart and have a relative volatility of 1.05 which makes it impossible to separate them by conventional distillation or rectification. Table 2 shows that with an agent giving a relative volatility of 1.26, only 52 actual plates are required to get 99% purity.

TABLE 2
______________________________________
Theoretical And Actual Plates Required vs. Relative
Volatility For Conjugated Linoleic Acids Sepatation
Relative
Theoretical Plates Required
Actual Plates
Volatilty
At Total Reflux, 99% Purity
Required, 75% Efficiency
______________________________________
1.14 70 94
1.16 62 83
1.26 40 53
1.27 39 52
______________________________________

The object of this invention is to provide a process or method of azeotropic distillation that will enhance the relative volatility of conjugated linoleic acids in their separation in a rectification column. It is a further object of this invention to identify effective azeotropic distillation agents that are stable and can be recycled.

The objects of this invention are provided by a process for the separation of conjugated linoleic acids which entails the use of certain organic compounds when employed as the agent in azeotropic distillation.

TABLE 3
______________________________________
Effective Azeotropic Distillation Agents For
Separatuin Of Conjugated Linoleic Acids By
Relative
______________________________________
Volatility
None 1.05
Ethyl acetoacetate 1.14
Propiophenone 1.16
Butyraldehyde 1.26
Butyl ether 1.25
1-Methyl-2-pyrrolidinone
1.25
______________________________________

Example 1; Fifty grams of conjugated linoleic acids mixture and fifty grams of butyl ether as the azeotropic forming agent were charged to a vapor-liquid equilibrium still and refluxed for two hours. The vapor composition was 50% 1-conjugated linoleic acid, 50% 2-conjugated linoleic acid; the liquid composition was 55.6% 1-conjugated linoleic and 44.4% 2-conjugated acid. This is a relative volatility of 1.25.

Berg, Lloyd, Brix, Terry

Patent Priority Assignee Title
6809115, Sep 21 2000 NUTRITION 21, LLC METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF DIABETES, THE REDUCTION OF BODY FAT, IMPROVEMENT OF INSULIN SENSITIVITY, REDUCTION OF HYPERGLYCEMIA, AND REDUCTION OF HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA WITH CHROMIUM COMPLEXES, CONJUGATED FATTY ACIDS, AND/OR CONJUGATED FATTY ALCOHOLS
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4874473, Apr 25 1986 Bayer Aktiengesellschaft Separation of diastereomers by extractive distillation
5391264, Mar 14 1994 Lloyd, Berg Separation of alpha-Phellandrene from d-limonene by azeotropic distillation
5582693, Jan 11 1996 Lloyd, Berg Separation of 3-carene and limonene by azeotropic distillation
5698080, Nov 22 1996 Separation of phellandrene from limonene by azeotropic distillation
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Aug 20 2003REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Feb 02 2004EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Feb 01 20034 years fee payment window open
Aug 01 20036 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 01 2004patent expiry (for year 4)
Feb 01 20062 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Feb 01 20078 years fee payment window open
Aug 01 20076 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 01 2008patent expiry (for year 8)
Feb 01 20102 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Feb 01 201112 years fee payment window open
Aug 01 20116 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 01 2012patent expiry (for year 12)
Feb 01 20142 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)