A low frequency electromagnetic field shielding panel having a first domain refined steel sheet with an easy direction parallel to a first axis and a second domain refined steel sheet substantially overlying the first sheet and having an easy direction generally orthogonal to the easy direction of the first sheet. The emf shielding panels are interspersed between an emf source and a critical volume rather than encapsulating the source or the critical volume.
|
1. A low frequency emf shield comprising a generally parallel pair of emf shield panels with a non-magnetic spacer sheet interposed therebetween, each of said shield panels having:
a first sheet of domain refined steel having a direction of high magnetic permeability ("an easy direction") parallel to a first axis; and, a second sheet of domain refined steel having an easy direction generally orthogonal to said easy direction of said first sheet.
6. A low frequency emf shield wall comprising a plurality of low frequency emf shields each of said emf shields further comprising a pair of emf shield panels with a non-magnetic spacer sheet interposed therebetween, each of said emf shield panels having:
a first sheet of domain refined steel having a direction of high magnetic permeability ("an easy direction") parallel to a first axis; and, a second sheer of domain refined steel having an easy direction generally orthogonal to an easy direction of said first sheet;
wherein said emf shields are arranged in a generally planar configuration with corresponding edges of adjacent sheets generally adjacent one another. 2. A low frequency emf shield as claimed in
3. A low frequency emf shield as claimed in
4. A low frequency emf shield as claimed in
5. A low frequency emf shield as claimed in
7. A low frequency emf shield wall as claimed in
8. A low frequency emf shield wall as claimed in
9. A low frequency emf shield wall as claimed in
10. A low frequency emf shield wall as claimed in
11. A low frequency emf shield wall as claimed in
12. A low frequency emf shield wall as claimed in
13. A low frequency emf shield wall as claimed in
14. A low frequency emf shield wall as claimed in
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This invention relates generally to electromagnetic field (hereinafter "EMF") shielding and more particularly to EMF shields for shielding against low magnitude, low frequency, electromagnetic fields.
Prior EMF shields have generally been designed to shield against high frequency fields in the range of frequencies typically associated with transformer or radio frequencies. Prior EMF shields generally surround either an EMF source to contain the field or surround a critical volume to isolate the volume from the field. Such typical prior EMF shields are disclosed in the following U.S. patents:
| ______________________________________ |
| 4,012,706 Westendorp |
| 4,156,862 Hansen |
| 4,227,037 Layton |
| 4,430,520 Tibbitts |
| 4,484,171 McLoughlin |
| 4,479,979 Krieger |
| 5,025,489 Yamaguchi |
| 5,066,937 Moran |
| 5,241,132 McCormack |
| 5,187,327 Ohta |
| 5,402,323 Schwenk |
| 5,483,423 Lewis |
| 5,504,659 Acatay |
| 5,566,055 Salvi |
| 5,572,121 Beswick |
| ______________________________________ |
Recently, concern has been arising over the effect of low magnitude low frequency magnetic fields such as typically arise from electrical wiring carrying AC current at around 50 to 60 hertz. Such fields are common in office buildings and similar structures where a considerable amount of wiring runs through a building structure to provide electrical power for equipment and lighting. In such applications, the extensive network of wiring makes it impractical to either shield the myriad of sources or to isolate the numerous critical volumes.
It is an object of the present invention therefore to provide an EMF shield which is effective against low magnitude, low frequency magnetic fields, which is easily installable in new installations or retrofittable to existing installations.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide an EMF shield effective against low magnitude, low frequency fields, without requiring containment of the field around a source or isolation of a critical volume.
It is a still further object of the present invention to provide an EMF shield in panel form which can be used to build an effective EMF shield wall.
A low frequency EMF shield panel comprising:
a first sheet of domain refined steel sheet having an easy direction parallel to a first axis; and,
a second sheet of domain refined steel sheet substantially overlying said first sheet and having an easy direction generally orthogonal to said easy direction of said first sheet.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention are described below with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 diagramatically illustrates the placement of an EMF shield according to the present invention relative to an EMF source and a person being shielded;
FIG. 2 is an exploded view of an EMF shield panel according to the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of an EMF shield panel according to the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a plan view of an alternate embodiment of an EMF shield according to the present invention;
FIG. 5 is an end elevation corresponding to FIG. 4;
FIG. 6 is a front elevation of an EMF shield wall according to the present invention; and,
FIG. 7 is an end elevation showing the interface between two adjacent EMF shield panels according to the present invention.
A low frequency EMF shield panel according to the present invention is generally indicated by reference 10 in the figures. The EMF shield panel 10 is made up of first and second sheets of domain refined steel; 12 and 14 respectively, substantially overlying one another.
Domain refined steels are commonly used in transformer applications because they contribute less to eddy current losses in transformer cores than do unrefined steels. The domain refining decreases the width of magnetic domains in the steel sheet. Domain refining results in a steel sheet with anisotropic magnetic permeability properties. Typically the magnetic permeability of a domain refined steel sheet will be 60 to 100 times greater in an "easy" direction than in "non-easy" direction generally perpendicular to the "easy" direction. This is somewhat analogous to light passing through a polarized filter.
Domain refining may be carried out through chemical, mechanical or laser etching processes. A domain refined steel which has proven particularly advantageous in the present invention is manufactured by Nippon Steel Corporation under the designation ZDKH which is manufactured by irradiating the surface of a steel sheet with a high output laser beam. This virtually instantaneously vaporizes and scatters the near surface layer forming local elastic and plastic regions in the electrical steel sheet and refining the magnetic domains.
According to the present invention, the first and second domain refined sheets, 12 and 14 respectively, are adhesively bonded and oriented with their respective easy directions generally orthogonal to each other. Lines 16 in FIG. 2 lie along the easy direction of the first sheet 12 and are used to illustrate the easy direction of the first sheet 12. Lines 18 in FIG. 2 lie along the easy direction of the second sheet 14 and are used to illustrate the easy direction of the second sheet 16.
In a preferred embodiment illustrated in FIG. 5, an EMF shield 30 is built up from two sets of EMF shield panels to as described above mounted parallel and substantially adjacent one another with a spacer sheet 20 interposed therebetween. The spacer sheet 20 would typically maintain a separation of from 5 mm to 10 mm between the EMF shield panels 10. The spacer sheet 20 would typically exhibit little or no magnetic field shielding capabilities and may for example be made from wood or plastic.
A corrosion inhibiting coating 22 in FIG. 5 may also be provided on at least the outer surfaces of the first and second EMF shield panels 10 respectively. The corrosion inhibiting coating 22 may for example be an epoxy.
The EMF shield panels 10 may be placed adjacent one another as shown in FIG. 6 to build up a wall of desired dimensions. Although reasonably effective shielding could probably be achieved with gaps as large as 10 mm between the edges of adjacent panels, it is preferable to avoid such gaps by horizontally and vertically offsetting the first sheet 12 and second sheet 14 as shown in FIGS. 4 through 6 to present stepped edges 24 in FIG. 5. Even better shielding may be provided if in addition to having the EMF shield panels 10 offset, the individual sheets 10 and 14 are also offset to provide additional stepped edges as shown by reference 32 in FIG. 5.
The stepped edges 24 and 32 allow the EMF shield panels to be installed without gaps by overlapping the stepped edges 24 as shown in FIG. 6 to form an EMF shield wall 26. Although the EMF shield panels 10 could be of any shape that enables adjacent stepped edges 24 to overlap, it is expected that a rectangular configuration is the easiest to manufacture and most versatile to install.
FIG. 7 illustrates the manner in which edges of adjacent EMF shield panels 30 are juxtaposed. The overlapping of the stepped edges 24 is illustrated at reference 34. The overlapping of the additional stepped edges is illustrated at reference 36.
As shown in FIG. 1, the EMF shield wall 26 is positioned between an EMF source 28 and a critical volume such as the space occupied by a person 30 in FIG. 1. This of course contrasts with the prior practises of either encapsulating the EMF source 28 to contain the field about the source or completely encapsulating the critical volume.
It has been found that using an EMF shield panel 10 made from two pairs of sheets of Nippon Steel Corp Laser-Scribed Lamination steel (ZDKH designation) of 0.27 mm thickness placed in front of an EMF source of 1000 MG (milli-gauss), a field reduction exceeding a ratio of 10:1 may be achieved. If greater reductions are required, for example in the case of higher field strengths, further EMF shield panels 10 may be stacked one above the other.
The invention is further illustrated by the following examples:
An EMF shield as described above was built up from two sets of cross-oriented EMF panels with a 10 mm air spacing therebetween. Each of the panels was made up of 2 sheets of Nippon Steel Corp Laser-Scribed Lamination steel (ZDKH designation) of 0.27 mm thickness. An EMF source emitting 1,000 mG was placed adjacent one face of the EMF panel shield. An EMF detector was placed adjacent the EMF shield on the side opposite from that of the EMF source. The detector detected an EMF intensity of 61 mG behind the shield which correlates to a field reduction ratio of 16.393:1.
An EMF shield panel was constructed generally in accordance with the panel described in Example 1 above, but with a 20 mm air spacing rather than a 10 mm air spacing. Using the same source and detector arrangement as described above in Example 1, it was found that the field intensity behind the shield was 56 mG corresponding to a field reduction ratio of 17.857:1.
The above description is intended in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense. Variations to the above description may be apparent to appropriately skilled persons without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims set out below.
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 10538677, | Dec 10 2014 | WOSINSKI, STANISLAW | Composition for impregnating materials to shield against the effects of alternating electromagnetic fields, its application in coating/impregnating fibrous and/or porous matrices and materials containing the same |
| 7370709, | Sep 02 2004 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Subterranean magnetic field protective shield |
| 8629356, | Dec 16 2011 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd | Magnetic field shielding raised floor panel |
| D939508, | Nov 19 2018 | AMB Company | Device performance enhancer |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 3982058, | May 13 1975 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy | Magnetic and electric field shielding of computer components from lightning |
| 4012706, | Dec 08 1975 | General Electric Company | Sheet-wound transformer coils |
| 4156862, | Feb 21 1978 | ABB POWER T&D COMPANY, INC , A DE CORP | Electrical inductive apparatus having non-magnetic flux shields |
| 4227037, | May 29 1979 | Wickes Manufacturing Company | Shielded non-metallic container |
| 4430520, | Apr 07 1982 | Tibbetts Industries, Inc. | Transducer shielding enclosure |
| 4484171, | Feb 18 1983 | Teal Electronics Corporation | Shielded transformer |
| 4749979, | Aug 16 1986 | U S PHILIPS CORPORATION, A CORP OF DE | Transformer comprising a magnetic screen |
| 5025489, | May 14 1987 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Transformer having shielding wall for driving a magnetron |
| 5055362, | Aug 18 1988 | Allegheny Ludlum Corporation | Pressurize-bonded composite material |
| 5066937, | Jun 24 1990 | TRANSFER TECHNOLOGY GROUP, PLC | Search coil assembly with laminate frame members and method for making same |
| 5147729, | Mar 31 1989 | Kawasaki Steel Corporation | Steel plate with organic coating having improved corrosion resistance in as-worked state |
| 5187327, | Sep 29 1989 | Riken | Superconducting magnetic shield |
| 5241132, | Jun 22 1990 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army | Electromagnetically shielded door |
| 5400088, | Dec 21 1990 | FIELD MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC | Apparatus, methods and material for absorbing magnetic radiation |
| 5402323, | Aug 20 1991 | Schroff GmbH | Equipment cabinet having spring-elastic seals |
| 5483423, | Nov 16 1993 | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | EMI shielding for components |
| 5504659, | Jul 03 1994 | Bodenseewerk Geratetechnik GmbH | Shielding structure |
| 5566055, | Mar 03 1995 | Parker Intangibles LLC | Shieled enclosure for electronics |
| 5572121, | Jun 29 1990 | Safeline Limited | Metal detector including a metal screening for producing a secondary magnetic field to reduce the metal free zone |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Mar 29 1998 | BIRKE, PAUL | ASEA BROWN BOVERI INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 009084 | /0367 | |
| Apr 06 1998 | Asea Brown Boveri Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Sep 10 2003 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
| Feb 23 2004 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Feb 22 2003 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Aug 22 2003 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Feb 22 2004 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Feb 22 2006 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Feb 22 2007 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Aug 22 2007 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Feb 22 2008 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Feb 22 2010 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Feb 22 2011 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Aug 22 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Feb 22 2012 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Feb 22 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |