A battery separator is made from a microporous polyolefin membrane having a thickness of about 0.33 mills to about 0.5 mils.

Patent
   6057060
Priority
Dec 24 1994
Filed
Jun 22 1997
Issued
May 02 2000
Expiry
Dec 24 2014
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
27
6
all paid
1. A battery separator comprising a microporous polyolefin membrane having a thickness of about 0.33 mils to about 0.5 mils.
2. A battery comprising the separator of claim 1.

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/650,210 filed May 20, 1996,now U.S. Pat. No. 5,691,077, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/359,772 filed Dec. 20, 1994, now abandoned.

The present invention is directed to an ultra-thin, single-ply battery separator.

In batteries, the anode and cathode are separated from one another by a separator. Today, "lithium batteries" are very popular because they are able to generate high energy outputs. The lithium battery market can be divided into two groups, the "primary" lithium battery and the "secondary" lithium battery. The primary lithium battery is a disposable battery, while the secondary lithium battery is a rechargeable battery.

In batteries, thin battery separators can provide several advantages that can improve the battery's performance and design. First, thinner separators enable attainment of higher rate capabilities. This means that the battery is able to produce higher current densities across the membrane because the electrical resistance of the separator can be reduced by reducing the separator's thickness. For a correlation of Gurley value to electrical resistance: See generally, Callahan, R. W. et al, "Characterization of Microporous Membrane Separators," Mar. 1-4, 1993 delivered at the Tenth International Seminar on Primary and Secondary Battery Technology and Application sponsored by Florida Educational Seminars, Inc., 2836 Banyon Blvd. Circle N.W., Boca Raton, Fla. 33431. The higher rate capabilities are important where quick power is needed (e.g., for acceleration in an electrical vehicle). Second, thinner separators allow the use of thinner electrodes. This means that the battery attains better electrode utilization and electrode cycling. The electrode utilization means that smaller batteries with equivalent power can be produced. The better electrode cycling means a greater number of rechargings over the battery's life. Third, thinner separators allow greater choice in separator design. In other words, various thin separators can be combined to custom design a separator for a particular battery.

Accordingly, there is a need in the battery arts for thinner battery separators.

A battery separator is made from a microporous polyolefin membrane having a thickness of less than or equal to 0.5 mil.

The present invention shall be described in further detail below by way of the following detailed description and the non-limiting examples.

The battery separators according to the instant invention comprises an ultra-thin layer. The layer is, of course, microporous and is discrete. For example, see: Kesting, R. E., Synthetic Polymeric Membranes, 2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York City, N.Y., (1985) at section 8.2 versus Ibid., Chapter 7, this reference is incorporated herein by reference.

Polyolefin, as used herein, refers to a class or group name for thermoplastic polymers derived from simple olefins. Exemplary polyolefins include polyethylene and polypropylene. Polyethylene refers to, for example, polymers and copolymer substantially consisting of ethylene monomers. Polypropylene refers to, for example, polymers and copolymers substantially consisting of propylene monomers.

The thickness of these separators is less than or equal to 0.5 mil (about 12 microns). These separators preferably range in thickness between about 0.5 mil (about 12 microns) and about 0.3 mil (about 7 microns).

The process, by which the inventive separators are made, broadly comprises the following steps: extruding a polymer to form a sheet; annealing the sheet; and stretching the annealed sheet. The specific methods for making these sheets, particularly polyethylene or polypropylene, will be discussed with references to the method of making membranes having a thickness greater than 1 mil. By way of non-limiting example, the following references, each of which is incorporated herein by reference, illustrate the state of the art for making membranes having a thickness greater than 1 mil: U.S. Pat. Nos.: 3,426,754; 3,588,764; 3,679,538; 3,801,404; 3,801,692; 3,843,761; 3,853,601; 4,138,459; 4,539,256; 4,726,989; and 4,994,335, each of the foregoing is incorporated herein by reference. Knowledge of these methods being assumed, the inventive process for making thin membranes shall be described below by way of explaining the differences between the prior art methods for making standard films (thickness greater than 1 mil) and inventive method of making a thin film (thickness less than about 1/2 mil).

The differences discussed below regarding extrusion, annealing, and stretching are based upon a die configuration of a 27" die equipped with a 70 mil mandrel gap. If the die configuration changes, then the differences will change. For example, if a 6" die is used, the die temperature difference between standard film process and thin film process is much smaller. Regardless of die configuration, thin films require less quench air.

With regard to extrusion conditions, standard film processes typically require stronger quench air conditions and lower extrusion temperatures than thin film processes. For example, the relevant quench conditions for a standard film process include: an air pressure of about 6" H2 O; an air ring gap in the range of 10/64 to 15/64 inches; and an air ring height of 1 to 2 inches; on the other hand, the relevant quench conditions of a thin film process include: an air pressure of about 0.6 to 3.0" H2 O; an air ring gap in the range of 5/64 to 10/64 inches; and a ring height of about 1 to 2 inches. The relevant extrusion conditions for a standard film process (using Exxon's Escorene PP 4292 resin as an example) include: a die temperature in the range of 191 to 198°C and a barrel temperature of 200 to 205°C; on the other hand, the relevant extrusion conditions for a thin film process (using the same material) include: a die temperature in the range of 210°C (for 0.5 mil final product) to 224°C (for 0.33 mil final product) and a barrel temperature of 210°C

With regard to annealing and stretching conditions, the inter-ply adhesion (measured as peel strength) must be lower than that of the standard process, so that the individual plies do not split (i.e. tear apart) when they are deplied. The ability to resist splitting is proportional to the ply's thickness. Thus, if the plies stick together (due to adhesion) and the stickiness is greater than the split resistance, then the plies cannot be separated (deplied) without splitting. For example, the adhesion of plies having a thickness of about 1 mil should be less than about 15 grams/inch, whereas for 0.5 mil plies, the adhesion should be less than about 8 grams/inch, and for 0.33 mil plies, less than about 5 grams/inch. To lower the adhesion values, the annealing/stretching temperatures for the inventive process are less than those for the standard process. For example, the annealing/stretching temperatures for a polypropylene film would be in the range of 120-125°C (inventive process), compared to range of 140-150°C (standard process), and for a polyethylene film about 110°C (inventive process compared to about 115° C. (standard process).

Further information about the foregoing invention may be obtained from the following non-limiting examples. The test methods referred to herein are set forth below.

Test Methods

Gurley ASTM-D726(B)

Gurley is a resistance to air flow measured by the Gurley densometer (e.g. Model 4120). Gurley is the time in seconds required to pass 10 cc of air through one square inch of product under a pressure of 12.2 inches of water.

Thickness

Method: T411om-83 developed under the auspices of the Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry. Thickness is determined using a precision micrometer with a 1/2 inch diameter, circular shoe contacting the sample at seven (7) PSI. Ten (10) individual micrometer readings taken across the width of the sample are averaged.

Porosity ASTM D-2873

Density ASTM D-792

Peel Strength

Peel strength is measured using a tension and compression tester to determine the force in grams required to separate two one-inch wide sections of bonded membrane. The peel rate is 6 inches/minute. Three measurements are taken across the web and averaged.

Melt Index ASTM D 1238; PE: 190°C/2.16 Kg; PP: 230°C/2.16 Kg.

Ultra-thin, single-ply battery separators, as disclosed above, were made in the following mnanner:

The polypropylene and polyethylene resins used are set forth in TABLES 1 & 2:

TABLE 1
______________________________________
Polypropylene (PP Monopolymer)
Density Melt Index
Resin (g/Cm3) (g/10 min) Supplier
______________________________________
A Escorene 0.90 1.4 Exxon Chemical
PP4292
B Fina PP 327l 0.905 1.5 Fina Oil &
Chemical
C Fina PP 328l 0.905 1.1 Fina Oil &
Chemical
D Escorene 0.90 1.4 Exxon Chemical
PP4292
(nucleated)
E Escorene 0.90 1.4 Exxon Chemical
PP4372*
F Escorene 0.90 3.0 Exxon Chemical
PP3182
______________________________________
*contains an antiblocking agent
TABLE 2
______________________________________
Polyethylene (HDPE)
Density Melt Index
Resin (g/cm3) (g/10 min) Supplier
______________________________________
G Fina 0.958 0.70 Fina Oil &
HDPEGF7750 Chemical
H Escorene 0.964 0.30 Exxon Chemical
HDZ107
______________________________________

The extruder equipment was configured, as set forth in TABLE

TABLE 3
______________________________________
Extruder
L/D Barrel Die Die Land Blow-up
Ratio Size Size Opening Length Ratio
______________________________________
E1 24 2.5" 12" or 27"
70 mil 3" 1
E2 24 3.5" 12" or 27" 70 mil 3" 1
E3 30 1.25" 6" 70 mil 3" 1
______________________________________
TABLE 4
__________________________________________________________________________
Extrusion Condition
Quenching
Resin (See Extruder/Die Extruder Melt Die Air Ring Air Press Air Ring
Line
Tables 1 Size (See Temp Temp Temp Height (inches Opening Thickness
Speed
Product & 2) Table 3) (°C) (°C) (°C) (inch)
H2 O) (inches) (mil)
(ft/min)
__________________________________________________________________________
P1 A E3/6" 200 205
205
1" 1.5" 0.078
0.38 42
P2 C E3/6" 205 215 215 1" 1.5" 0.078 0.38 42
P3 C E2/27" 230 243 243 1" 1.2" 0.078 0.38 47
P4 A E2/27" 210 224 224 1" 1.2" 0.078 0.38 50
P5 A E2/12" 220 224 224 1" 1.2" 0.078 0.38 50
P6 B E2/27" 210 224 224 1" 1.2" 0.078 0.38 50
E1 G E1/27" 200 220 200 1" 1.0" 0.078 0.38 60
E2 H E1/12" 180 199 185 1.25" 1.0" 0.094 0.59 60
__________________________________________________________________________

The precursor films were annealed in an 8-ply film. This means that since the precursor films are extruded as inflated tubes, when they are collapsed, they created a 2-ply film. Four of these 2-ply films are wound up together to make the 8-ply film. The annealing conditions are set forth below in TABLE 5.

TABLE 5
______________________________________
Annealing Conditions
Annealing
Peel Strength
Product (see Table 4) Annealing Temp., °C Time, Min (gram/inch)
______________________________________
P1 136 16 --
P2 140 16 --
P3 120 16 --
P4, P5 120 16 2
P6 135 16 0
E1 110 19 1
E2 115 19 1
______________________________________

The annealed precursor films are stretched to form microporous membranes. The annealed precursor films were stretched as 16-ply films (8 rolls of 2 ply from an extruded tubular precursor). Alternatively, the annealed precursor films may be stretched as an 8-ply film or 24-ply film. The stretching conditions are set forth in TABLE 6:

TABLE 6
__________________________________________________________________________
Stretching Conditions
Product (see
Cold Stretch,
Cold
Hot Stretch Hot Relax Thickness
TABLE 5) Temp (°C) Stretch* Temp (°C) Hot Stretch*
Temp (°C) Hot
Relax*,1 (mil) Gurley
(sec)
__________________________________________________________________________
P4, P5
ambient
25% 120°C
115% 120°C
40% 0.33 12
P6 ambient 25% 135°C 115% 135°C 40% 0.33 10
E1 ambient 40% 110°C 110% 110°C 50% 0.33 8
E2 ambient 45% 115°C 105% 115°C 40% 0.5 11
__________________________________________________________________________
*The percentage of stretching/relaxing was based on the original length
before cold stretching
1 The relax step indicates that the stretched film is allowed to
shrink back.

Yu, Wei-Ching

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10347951, Sep 20 2012 Celgard, LLC Thin battery separators and methods
11114702, Sep 20 2012 Celgard, LLC Thin battery separators and methods
11594765, Sep 20 2012 Celgard, LLC Thin battery separators and methods
11909006, Sep 20 2012 Celgard, LLC Thin battery separators and methods
6920167, May 27 1999 Sony Corporation Semiconductor laser device and method for fabricating thereof
7378181, Jan 15 2002 Quallion LLC Electric storage battery construction and method of manufacture
7416811, Jan 15 2003 Quallion LLC Electric storage battery construction and method of manufacture
7432012, Jan 15 2002 Quallion LLC Electric storage battery construction and method of manufacture
7488553, Jan 15 2002 Quallion LLC Electric storage battery construction and method of manufacture
7569305, Jan 15 2002 Quallion LLC Electric storage battery construction and method of manufacture
7601461, Jan 15 2002 Qualllion LLC Electric storage battery construction and method of manufacture
7632603, Jan 15 2002 Quallion LLC Electric storage battery construction and method of manufacture
7879486, Jan 15 2002 Quallion LLC Electric storage battery construction and method of manufacture
7968230, Nov 21 2003 Energizer Brands, LLC High discharge capacity lithium battery
8007940, Nov 21 2003 Energizer Brands, LLC High discharge capacity lithium battery
8080329, Mar 25 2004 Quallion LLC Uniformly wound battery
8104625, May 20 2004 Asahi Kasei Chemicals Corporation Microporous membrane made of polyolefins
8124274, Nov 21 2003 Energizer Brands, LLC High discharge capacity lithium battery
8283071, Nov 21 2003 Energizer Brands, LLC High discharge capacity lithium battery
8486556, Apr 07 2006 Celgard LLC Multilayer separator exhibiting improved strength and stability
8603683, Mar 19 2009 Enevate Corporation Gas phase deposition of battery separators
8642212, Nov 21 2003 Energizer Brands, LLC High discharge capacity lithium battery
9044716, Jan 13 2010 TORAY INDUSTRIES, INC Microporous membranes and methods for producing and using such membranes
9263740, Dec 01 2004 MURATA MANUFACTURING CO , LTD Battery anode containing CoSnC material
9647259, Mar 19 2009 Enevate Corporation Gas phase deposition of battery separators
9666847, Sep 20 2012 Celgard, LLC Thin battery separators and methods
RE47520, Apr 10 2000 Celgard, LLC Separator for a high energy rechargeable lithium battery
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4465748, Apr 20 1982 HOLLINGSWORTH & VOSE COMPANY LIMITED Glass fibre paper separator for electrochemical cells
4769299, Jun 27 1986 HAWKER ENERGY PRODUCTS, INC High rate sealed lead-acid battery with ultrathin plates
5281498, May 23 1991 GS YUASA INTERNATIONAL LTD Sheet-like separator and valve regulated lead acid battery
5609947, Sep 27 1995 Tonen Chemical Corporation Laminated non-woven fabric filtering medium and method for producing same
5667911, Nov 17 1994 Celgard, LLC Methods of making cross-ply microporous membrane battery separator, and the battery separators made thereby
5691077, Dec 20 1994 Celgard, LLC Shutdown, trilayer battery separator
//////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Jun 22 1997Celgard Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Oct 28 1997YU, WEI-CHINGHoechst Celanese CorporationASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0089110618 pdf
Jan 15 1998Hoechst Celanese CorporationCelgard LLCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0091680439 pdf
Dec 14 1999Celgard LLCCELGARD, INC , A CORP OF DELAWAREASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0105060869 pdf
Dec 15 1999CELGARD, INC CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, THESECURITY AGREEMENT0139640538 pdf
Jun 30 2004CELGARD, INC Celgard, LLCCHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0148220710 pdf
Nov 09 2004Celgard, LLCJPMORGAN CHASE BANK, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0153480137 pdf
Apr 08 2014JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTCelgard, LLCRELEASE OF SECURITY AGREEMENTS IN PATENT RIGHTS0333800608 pdf
Apr 08 2014CELGARD, LLC F K A CELGARD, INC BANK OF AMERICA, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTPATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT0326310655 pdf
Aug 26 2015BANK OF AMERICA, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTCELGARD, LLC F K A CELGARD, INC TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES PATENTS0364850267 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Sep 26 2003M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Sep 14 2007M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Sep 23 2011M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
May 02 20034 years fee payment window open
Nov 02 20036 months grace period start (w surcharge)
May 02 2004patent expiry (for year 4)
May 02 20062 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
May 02 20078 years fee payment window open
Nov 02 20076 months grace period start (w surcharge)
May 02 2008patent expiry (for year 8)
May 02 20102 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
May 02 201112 years fee payment window open
Nov 02 20116 months grace period start (w surcharge)
May 02 2012patent expiry (for year 12)
May 02 20142 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)