An underground object detector can locate and identify the shape of underground objects using a pulsed laser to generate acoustic waves in soil. A remotely located microphone detects an acoustic signal between the soil surface and subsurface objects. The amplitude of this acoustic signal is correlated with the position of the laser beam source and output on a visual display, resulting in an acoustic map of the ground. A raster scanning of the suspect ground in the vicinity reveals the shape of the underground object, allowing the operator to discriminate benign and natural objects.
|
13. A method of detecting underground objects comprising the steps of:
directing a laser pulse at a ground area; receiving a first acoustic signal produced by said laser pulse; receiving a second acoustic signal produced by said laser pulse; determining the time differential between receiving said first acoustic signal and receiving said second acoustic signal.
1. A laser driven acoustic underground object detector comprising:
a laser source having a beam; a scanner connected to said laser source and adapted to direct said beam over a predetermined area; an acoustic sensor operative to receive a plurality of acoustic signals produced when said beam is directed at said area; a control circuit having a differentiator connected to said laser, said scanner and said acoustic sensor; and said differentiator operable to compute a diffential between said plurality of acoustic signals.
2. The underground object detector of
3. The underground object detector of
4. The underground object detector of
5. The underground object detector of
6. The underground object detector of
7. The underground object detector of
a magnitude of said first acoustic signal; a magnitude of said second acoustic signal; and said timing differential;
for each of said predetermined points. 8. The underground object detector of
10. The underground object detector of
11. The underground object detector of
12. The underground object detector of
14. The method of
15. The method of
defining an area to be scanned for underground objects; defining a series of predetermined points within said area; directing a laser pulse at each of said predetermined points; storing in a series said timing differential and said magnitude differential after said determining step.
16. The method of
|
Partial funding under U.S. Department of Defense contract No. DAAG55-97-1-0013 was provided for the invention disclosed herein.
This application claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application No. 60/057,725 entitled Optical Pulse Induced Acoustic Mine Detection, filed Aug. 28, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference.
Acoustic sensing of underground objects has typically been performed with low frequency waves from widely separated sources. These wavelengths are too long to reliably image underground land mines. High-frequency acoustic or ultrasound waves are difficult to couple into the ground from the air. It is difficult or impossible to get conventional ground contact acoustic sources close to the mine position without risking detonation.
Further, all existing mine detection systems are subject to high rates of false alarms. Ground penetrating radar for example, a common method of mine detection, tends to locate all submerged objects, and does not discriminate sufficiently based on the shape or composition of the located object. In a tactical environment, such an area is likely to contain such objects as battle debris, spent shell casings, and containers from supplies and foodstuffs. Metal detectors, another common detection mechanism, detect all benign and harmful metal objects, and are also blind to plastic and ceramic mines. As typical prior art methods do not adequately report the shape of a submerged object, all objects so found must be suspected as a possible mine. An estimated 300 holes are dug for each live mine actually recovered. Such a low frequency of offending objects tends to promote carelessness, thereby having an overall detrimental effect on the mine detection operation. It would be beneficial to employ a mine detection operation which can provide shape resolution of a submerged object to allow discrimination of benign shapes. It would be further beneficial to employ a mine detection operation which can be performed remotely through a medium which will not cause detonation of a live, submerged mine, and which allows sensing equipment to remain a safe distance from the sensing area.
The purpose of the invention is to detect, locate, and identify the shape of underground objects such as mines, buried waste, or utilities. A pulsed laser beam is used to generate acoustic waves in soil. A remotely located acoustic microphone detects an acoustic signal between the soil surface and shallow subsurface objects. The amplitude of this acoustic signal is correlated with the position of the laser beam source and output on a visual display, resulting in an acoustic map of the ground under examination. A raster pattern scanning of the suspect ground in the vicinity of a potential mine reveals the shape of the underground object, allowing the operator to discriminate benign and natural objects, such as rocks, from the recognizable shape of land mines.
The invention will become more fully understood from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a side view of a laser source striking a target surface;
FIG. 2 is a side view of a laser detection apparatus as defined herein;
FIG. 3 is a graph of acoustic signals as produced by the present invention;
FIG. 4a is a top view of the scanning method as described herein;
FIG. 4b is a side view of the scanning method of FIG. 4a;
FIG. 4c is the display of a portion of a submerged object produced by the present invention;
FIG. 4d is another display of a portion of a submerged object produced by the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a flowchart of the method used to detect mines as defined herein.
A mine detection operation as defined by the present invention involves scanning a target area with a laser beam to produce detectable acoustic signals indicating position and depth of submerged matter.
Laser pulses generate audible sound, particularly on striking fibrous targets, such as the ground surface. Since IR light from such pulses is strongly absorbed in the first few microns of most solids, sound is produced by local heating and cooling of the ground caused by corresponding expansion and contraction. The result is a localized acoustic source that can be rapidly and repeatedly scanned over an area of ground without danger of detonating land mines. Acoustical signals propagate readily in soil and can be sensed with a remote microphone at or near the ground surface. For additional mobility, the microphone can be mounted on a rolling contact so that measurements could be taken in motion. Alternatively, a laser vibrometer may be used which can be scanned to effectively function as several microphones in different locations. A shallow subsurface object in combination with the ground surface will create a resonant structure which will amplify the acoustic response.
It should be noted that some skilled in the art refer to ground propagated waves as seismic waves and air propagated waves as acoustic waves. The present application uses the terminology acoustic waves to denote waves which propagate through the ground as a result of laser excitation and which can be detected with a audio sensor such as a microphone at or proximate to the ground surface.
Referring to FIG. 1, laser-generated acoustic signal propagation is shown as reflected from a submerged object 10. A laser source 12 emits a beam 14 at a target area 16 on the ground surface 18. Such a beam 14 does not penetrate the ground surface 18, but rather causes localized heating and expansion at the target area 16. This heating causes compression waves 22 to produce source acoustic signals 24 which propagate through the ground 26. A submerged object 10 in the ground 26 will reflect the source acoustic signals 24 as acoustic response signals 25. These acoustic response signals indicate the depth of the submerged object 10 because the time required for the acoustic response signal to propagate from the object 10 varies with this depth.
Scanning patterns of a high granularity can therefore produce an accurate set of measurements to ascertain the continuity and depth of such a submerged object 10. Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, the laser-generated acoustic signals are used to detect a submerged object 10. A scanner 28 is used to focus the laser systematically in a raster pattern over the ground 26 to be cleared. Source acoustic signals 24 are generated from the initial excitation of the ground 18 surface. Microphone 30 receives both the source acoustic signals 24 and the acoustic response signals 25 reflected from submerged object 10. A control circuit 32 controls scanner 28 position and beam 14 pulsing, and receives source acoustic signals 24 and acoustic response signals 25 through microphone 30. The differential between the time of receipt of the source acoustic signals 24 and the acoustic response signals therefore indicates the depth. The control circuit 32 therefore correlates scanner 28 position, timing of the acoustic source signals 24, timing of the acoustic response signals 25, and propagation speed 34 of the acoustic signals to ascertain depth and position of the submerged object 10 and produce output display 36.
In effect, locating the underground mine is accomplished in the same way as a carpenter locates building studs by tapping on the wall and listening to the sound--without the danger of detonating the mine. The concept described above was tested in the Optical Sciences Laboratory at Northeastern University. The output of a pulsed CO2 laser at a wavelength of 10.6 μm was directed onto a 300 cm3 irregularly-shaped 0.425 kg sample of Idaho clay soil. An audio microphone was partially embedded into the soil sample and the microphone signal displayed on an oscilloscope screen. The laser power was approximately 50 mJ/pulse with a repetition rate of 50 Hz. The laser pulse width was 250 ns, providing essentially an impulse acoustic excitation.
For a subsurface object at a depth of α=10 cm, for example, a resonant frequency would be around 10 kHz, assuming a fundamental resonance with λ=2α and a velocity of sound in soil of 2000 m/s. By setting an electronic filter to select frequencies between 2 and 50 kHz, resonances for objects from 2-50 cm deep would be detected.
The dimensional acoustic resonance signal were clearly apparent in the oscilloscope trace. This acoustical response signal 100 as recorded on a PC analog-to-digital interface card is shown in FIG. 3. The primary frequency is near 10 kHz, in agreement with our expectation for resonance in this 7×7×6.5 cm sample. The modification of the acostic signal 102 is caused by surface weighting the soil sample with a 30 gm mass. The measurable modifications of the acoustical signal, particularly near 1 ms, indicate a sensitivity to even very small objects.
In alternative embodiments, additional signal information may be employed, such as a third signal reflected from the bottom of the submerged object, or more detailed information about time history, such as spectral information indicating resonance.
Further detail with respect to shape resolution is described below with respect to FIGS. 4a-4d. Laser 12 scans an area 50 to be cleared according to raster pattern 52. A series of target areas 54a, 54b are irradiated. At target area 54a, acoustic response signals 56 are detected by microphone 30 at a propagation time corresponding to depth d1 58, denoting shallow side 62 of submerged object 10. On the next pass of the scan, target area 54b results in acoustic response signals 56 being detected at a propagation time corresponding to depth d2 60, denoting the deep side 64 of submerged object 10. These acoustic response signals 56 are processed to produce display image 62', corresponding to a scan at depth d1 58 (FIG. 4c), and display image 64', corresponding to a scan at depth d2 60 (FIG. 4d). Such signals taken from a series of target points can be stored by the control circuit as a series of ground elements, each denoting signals from a particular target point. This series can be arranged in a sequence of display frames, each denoting a particular depth. At a particular depth, the ground elements can be used to generate display elements representing the shape and mass of the object. Measurements stored from a series of target points can therefore be shown in a display image depicting a number of ground elements, each representing different, adjacent, target points.
Referring to FIG. 5, a flowchart of the method used to examine an area to be cleared is shown. The scan of the ground area proceeds in a two dimensional raster fashion, and will be denoted as X and Y axis. Timing between receipt of the source acoustic signal and the acoustic response signal indicates depth, and will be referred to as the Z axis. At 200, an area to be cleared is defined. At 202, the next X axis position is chosen for scanning. At 204, the next Y target position is chosen on the current X axis. At 206, a laser pulse is directed towards the target position to excite the ground. At 208, the source acoustic signal is received from the laser excitation. At 210, acoustic response signals are reflected off a submerged object (if present). At 212, a check is made to determine if acoustic response signals were received. If an acoustic response signal was received, step 214 calculates the depth of the submerged object based on the timing differential between receipt of the source acoustic signal and the acoustic response signal, thereby indicating the Z axis of the submerged object. At step 216, the mass of the submerged object is computed based on the differential in magnitude between the source acoustic signal and the received acoustic response signal. At step 218, a check is made to determine if the current Y scan has reached the edge of the area. If so, the laser is advanced to check the next X scan range at step 220, otherwise the next Y target position is chosen at step 204. At step 222, the current X scan position is examined to see if the X limit has been reached, and control reverts to step 202 to scan the next X axis until the limit is reached.
A detailed survey of the submerged objects over a large area can therefore be produced. As the shape resolution of submerged objects is improved when a high granularity of target areas is provided, a scan utilizing finely tuned increments of target areas and response signal timing will yield a highly detailed rendition of submerged objects.
As various extensions and modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art, the foregoing invention is not intended to be limited except as defined by the following claims.
DiMarzio, Charles A., McKnight, Stephen W., Lindberg, Scott C.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10236654, | Sep 05 2011 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie GmbH | Marking apparatus with at least one gas laser and heat dissipator |
6809991, | Jan 21 2003 | Raytheon Company | Method and apparatus for detecting hidden features disposed in an opaque environment |
7109910, | Sep 06 2002 | L-3 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY AND DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC | Mine detection using radar vibrometer |
7183964, | Sep 06 2002 | L-3 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY AND DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC | Mine detection using radar vibrometer |
8223590, | Feb 12 2008 | The United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of the Navy | Airborne laser-acoustic mine detection system |
8228760, | Feb 12 2008 | The United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of the Navy | Airborne laser-acoustic mine detection system |
9071034, | Sep 05 2011 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie GmbH | Laser device |
9073349, | Sep 05 2011 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie GmbH | Marking apparatus |
9077140, | Sep 05 2011 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie GmbH | Laser device and method for generating laser light |
9077141, | Sep 05 2011 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie GmbH | Gas laser device and gas reservoir |
9139019, | Sep 05 2011 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie GmbH | Marking device for marking an object with marking light |
9300106, | Sep 05 2011 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie GmbH | Laser device with a laser unit and a fluid container for a cooling means of said laser |
9348026, | Sep 05 2011 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie GmbH | Device and method for determination of a position of an object by means of ultrasonic waves |
9573223, | Sep 05 2011 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie GmbH | Marking apparatus with a plurality of gas lasers with resonator tubes and individually adjustable deflection means |
9573227, | Sep 05 2011 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie GmbH | Marking apparatus with a plurality of lasers, deflection means, and telescopic means for each laser beam |
9577399, | Sep 05 2011 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie GmbH | Marking apparatus with a plurality of lasers and individually adjustable sets of deflection means |
9595801, | Sep 05 2011 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie GmbH | Marking apparatus with a plurality of lasers and a combining deflection device |
9664898, | Sep 05 2011 | Alltec Angewandte Laserlicht Technologie GmbH | Laser device and method for marking an object |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3713156, | |||
3953822, | Oct 15 1973 | RCA Corporation | Wave-energy imaging technique |
4052666, | Apr 15 1976 | Remote sensing of vegetation and soil using microwave ellipsometry | |
4275741, | Aug 13 1979 | WURLITZER COMPANY, THE; TWCA CORP | Procedure for noncontacting measurement of subcutaneous temperature distributions |
4407292, | Aug 14 1978 | GIBSON PIANO VENTURES, INC , A DELAWARE CORPORATION | Procedure and apparatus for noncontacting measurement of subcutaneous temperature distributions |
4458945, | Oct 01 1981 | Oil Mining Corporation | Oil recovery mining method and apparatus |
4627442, | Jan 12 1983 | The University Court of the University of Glasgow | Microwave thermographic apparatus |
4653855, | Oct 09 1984 | Quantum Diagnostics Ltd. | Apparatus and process for object analysis by perturbation of interference fringes |
4655086, | Apr 30 1985 | Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. | Method and means for measuring sound intensity |
4773298, | Dec 04 1985 | BLOHM & VOSS INTERNATIONAL GMBH, HERMANN-BLOHM-STRASSE 3, D-2000 HAMBURG 1, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY | Method for neutralizing surface-laid or camouflaged land mines and mobile unit for performing the method |
4775028, | Feb 22 1985 | CAL Corporation | Method and system for depth sounding |
4794395, | Apr 17 1987 | WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL | Passive interferometric imaging receiver system |
4937580, | May 19 1988 | Trustees of Dartmouth College; TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE, THE | Geophysical radar apparatus and method |
4991149, | Dec 07 1989 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy | Underwater object detection system |
5123144, | Aug 09 1989 | MASCHINENFABRIK RIETER AG, A CORP OF SWITZERLAND | Method and apparatus for establishing whether fiber material is contaminated with foreign objects |
5454048, | Nov 06 1992 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, THE | Apparatus for multiplexed imaging using optically-generated Kronecker products |
5646907, | Aug 09 1995 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy | Method and system for detecting objects at or below the water's surface |
5945592, | Aug 03 1995 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | System and method for isotope ratio analysis and gas detection by photoacoustics |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Aug 27 1998 | Northeastern University | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Sep 09 1998 | DIMARZIO, CHARLES A | Northeastern University | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 009488 | /0133 | |
Sep 09 1998 | MCKNIGHT, STEPHEN W | Northeastern University | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 009488 | /0133 | |
Sep 11 1998 | LINDBERG, SCOTT C | Northeastern University | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 009488 | /0133 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Nov 10 2003 | M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
Dec 10 2007 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
May 30 2008 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
May 30 2003 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Nov 30 2003 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 30 2004 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
May 30 2006 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
May 30 2007 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Nov 30 2007 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 30 2008 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
May 30 2010 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
May 30 2011 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Nov 30 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 30 2012 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
May 30 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |