In the method for producing an immunoglobulin solution suitable for intravenous application with an igm proportion of more than 5% by weight with respect to the immunoglobulin proportion, an igm-containing immunoglobulin solution is treated with a protease. The intravenously well tolerated preparation obtained is characterized by not being chemically modified and by having low anticomplementary activity ACA.
|
1. Method of producing an intravenously administrable polyclonal, immunoglobulin preparation, which is chemically not modified, with an igm proportion of more than 5% by weight, with respect to the total immunoglobulin proportion, and an anticomplementary activity of <500 CH50/g protein, comprising the steps of:
selecting an igm-containing plasma fraction; preparing an aqueous solution or suspension from the igm-containing plasma fraction, the igm proportion in the aqueous solution or suspension being more than 5% by weight; incubating the aqueous solution or suspension with a protease to reduce the anticomplementary activity of the aqueous solution or suspension to <500 CH50/g protein.
2. Method according to
3. Method according to
4. Method according to
5. Method according to
6. Method according to
7. Method according to
9. Method according to
10. Method according to
11. The method according to
12. The method according to
13. The method according to
14. The method according to
15. The method according to
16. The method according to
17. The method according to
|
This application claims priority to PCT/CH97/00388, filed Oct. 14, 1997.
This invention relates to a method of producing an immunoglobulin solution suitable for intravenous application. Used as the starting material is a protein fraction obtained from human or animal blood which contains the immunoglobulins in concentrated form.
As is well known, immunoglobulins play an important role in the immune system of man and mammal in fighting off infections. The immunoglobulins are divided up into different classes (e.g. IgG, IgA, IgM, IgD and IgE) with differing biochemical and physiological properties. Until 1980 only IgG was isolated and used as an IV-well-tolerated product for prophylaxis and therapy. In EP-A-0 013 901, EP-A-0 413 187 and EP-A-0 352 500 IgM preparations are described, which have been made intravenously well tolerated mainly through treatment with β-propiolactone. EP-A-0 413 188 describes a method in which the IV-tolerance is achieved through anion exchange chromatography with selective elution of the IV-tolerant fraction.
Object of the present invention is the production of a highly purified, IgM concentrate suitable for intravenous administration for therapy and prophylaxis. The product should have a low anticomplementary activity (ACA), and demonstrate a low blood pressure drop in a rat model, but the IgM molecules should not be chemically modified, however. This object was obtained surprisingly through treatment of a IgM-containing immunoglobulin solution with a protease.
The subject matter of the invention is therefore the method defined in claim 1.
The protease treatment is preferably an incubation at raised temperature in the presence of pepsin, papain, plasmin or thermolysine. The proteases can also be chemically modified, immobilized on a substrate and/or produced through genetic engineering. The preparation according to the inventive method can be transferred into an IV-administrable solution. Such a solution displays a reduction of the ACA, of the blood pressure drop in a rat model and of the C1q binding activity.
Suitable as starting materials for the method according to the present invention are immunoglobulin-containing solutions, such as, e.g. plasma, precipitate A or B from Kistler-Nitschmann-fractionation; Cohn fraction I/II/III; II/III; III; or other IgM-containing plasma fractions from human or animal plasma. For example, an immunoglobulin-containing fraction, such as precipitate B according to Kistler-Nitschmann, can be dissolved in a buffer, most of the impurities being removed through a precipitation with 0.5 to 5% octanoic acid at pH 4 to 6, preferably pH 5. Afterwards the solution is incubated at low ionic strength for 1 to 48 hours, preferably 9 hours, at a temperature of 20 to 50°C, preferably 37°C with addition of at least 50 U/g of pepsin, preferably 600 U/G.
For further purification, the solution can be subjected to an adsorption, for example with a gel containing a DEAE-group in batch or column method. If the IgM concentration in the end product is supposed to be increased further, the IgM solution is put on an ion exchanger (e.g. TMAE-Fraktogel®). Through a selective elution, e.g. by means of a salt gradient or pH gradient, the IgM fraction can be isolated. Through ultrafiltration and diafiltration, for example a gel filtration, the solution can be concentrated and the electrolyte content can be adjusted to a final, intravenously well tolerated formulation. The protein concentration can amount to 1 to 20%, preferably 3 to 6%. The product can contain in addition proteins, preferably albumin, as well as sugar, preferably glucose or sucrose, or amino acids.
To assess the intravenous compatibility of immunoglobulin preparations, the anticomplementary activity (ACA) is usually used. To determine the ACA, a defined quantity of the product to be tested is incubated with a defined quantity of guinea pig complement and the remaining quantity of complement titrated. The ACA is indicated as consumption of CH50 per g of immunoglobulin. The indicated results of the ACA were determined to a large extent according to the method published by M. Mayer (Mayer, M. M. (1961), "Complement and Complement Fixation" in Experimental Immunochemistry, 2nd edition, pp. 133-240, C Thomas, Springfield, Ill.). Valid as a guide value for intravenously usable IgG products is an ACA of <1000 CH50 per g of protein.
To assess intravenous compatibility, the binding of the C1q complement components to the immunoglobulin can be further used. For determination, a defined quantity of test product is incubated with a defined quantity of purified, radioactively labelled C1q complement in buffer and in serum. The C1q binding activity of the test product is determined through precipitation in the presence of polyethylene glycol. The higher the radioactivity in the precipitate, the greater the C1q binding activity of the product. Finer predictions about the type of C1q binding and thereby the quality of the product can be achieved if the C1q is radioactively labelled with two different methods. On the one hand, under as mild as possible oxidative conditions with lactoperoxidase (LPO), and, on the other hand, under drastic oxidative conditions with chloramine T (CT). The tests were carried out to a large extent according to the method published by P. Spath (P. J. Spath, A. Corvetta, U. E. Nydegger, R. Buttler: "An Extended C1q-Binding Assay Using Lactoperoxidase- and Chloramin-T-iodinated C1q," Scand. J. Immunol. 18, 319-328, 1983). Expected of an intact, intravenously well tolerated preparation is that the C1q binding activity is as minimal as possible. A model for testing the IV compatibility of immunoglobulins is the rat model according to Bleeker et al. [W. K. Bleeker, J. Agterberg, G. Rigter, A. de Vries-van Rossen, J. C. Bakker: "An Animal Model for the Detection of Hypotensive Side Effects of Immunoglobulin Preparations,", Vox. Sang. 52:281-290 (1987)]. Tolerance parameter in this model is blood pressure. Intravenously poorly tolerated products lead to a significant drop in blood pressure.
PAC Reference Example 11 kg of precipitate B according to Kistler-Nitschmann was suspended in 4 kg of 0.1 mol/l acetate buffer, pH 5.1, and 2% octanoic acid was added at room temperature. 0.15 g of tricalcium phosphate was added per g of octanoic acid, and the precipitate filtered off. The filtrate was diafiltered against 20 mmol/l piperazine, 60 mmol/l NaCl, pH 5.8. The diafiltered solution was treated with 75 mg DEAE-Sephadex® per g of protein. Then the protein concentration was adjusted to 20 mg/ml, and the solution was treated with 1% Tweene® 80 and 0.3% TNBP (tri-n-butyl-phosphate) for 8 hours at 25°C The solution was then put on a TMAE-Fraktogel® column, and the IgM fraction was eluted with 20 mmol/l piperazine, 160 mmol/l NaCl, pH 5.8. The end product was concentrated to 5% protein, and the pH value adjusted to 4.5.
1 kg of precipitate B according to Kistler-Nitschmann was suspended in 4 kg of 0.1 mol/l acetate buffer, pH 5.1, and 2% octanoic acid was added at room temperature. 0.15 g of tricalcium phosphate was added per g of octanoic acid, and the precipitate filtered off. The filtrate was diafiltered against 20 mmol/l NaCl diafiltered, and the solution brought to 20 mg/ml protein. The pH value was adjusted with 0.2 mol/l HCl to 4.0, and the solution incubated for 9 hours at 37°C After cooling down to 20°C, the pH was adjusted to 5.8, and piperazine ad 20 mmol/l and NaCl ad 60 mmol/l added. The solution was subsequently treated with 1% Tween® 80 and 0.3% TNBP (tri-n-butyl-phosphate) for 8 hours at 25°C The solution was then put on a TMAE-Fraktogel® column, and the IgM fraction was eluted with 20 mmol/l piperazine, 160 mmol/l NaCl, pH 5.8. The end product was concentrated to 5% protein, and the pH value adjusted to 4.5.
1 kg of precipitate B according to Kistler-Nitschmann was suspended in 4 kg of 0.1 mmol/l acetate buffer, pH 5.1, and 2% octanoic acid was added at room temperature. 0.15 g of tricalcium phosphate was added per g of octanoic acid, and the precipitate filtered off. The filtrate was diafiltered against 20 mmol/l NaCl diafiltered, and the solution brought to 20 mg/ml protein. The pH value was adjusted with 0.2 mmol/l HCl to 4.0, and 600 U pepsin per g of protein were added. Then the solution was incubated for 9 hours at 37°C After cooling down to 20° C., the pH was adjusted to 5.8, and piperazine ad 20 mmol/l and NaCl ad 60 mmol/l added. The solution was subsequently treated with 1 % Tween® 80 and 0.3% TNBP (tri-n-butyl-phosphate) for 8 hours at 25°C The solution was then put on a TMAE-Fraktogel® column, and the IgM fraction was eluted with 20 mmol/l piperazine, 160 mmol/l NaCl, pH 5.8. The end product was concentrated to 5% protein, and the pH value adjusted to 4.5.
1 kg of precipitate B was prepared analogously to reference example 2, instead of 600 U of pepsin per g of protein of the solution, 1200 U of pepsin per g of protein being added, however, before the pH 4 incubation.
I. Characterization of the Experimental Products
The immunoglobulins IgG, IgA and IgM were nephelometrically determined with antisera. The total protein content was determined with the Kjeldahl method.
______________________________________ |
Protein IgG IgA IgM Isoagglutinins |
mg/g mg/g mg/g mg/g Anti-A Anti-B |
______________________________________ |
Reference |
44.4 4.1 16.8 45.0 1:64 1:64 |
example 1 |
Reference |
48.1 8.6 19.3 43.5 1:128 1:64 |
example 2 |
Example 1 |
51.3 7.0 22.0 50.5 1:128 1:64 |
Example 2 |
46.9 4.7 20.2 51.0 1:128 1:64 |
______________________________________ |
TABLE II |
______________________________________ |
Tolerance Parameters |
Rat model |
Blood C1q-binding |
pressure |
Puffer Serum |
ACA drop LPO CT LPO CT |
Treatment CH50/g % % % % % |
______________________________________ |
Reference |
Without pH 4 |
515 19 1.5 0.1 43 5.5 |
example 1 |
Reference |
pH 4 179 18 0 0.5 42 6.7 |
example 2 |
Example 1 |
pH 4 with 125 7 0 0.3 34 3.9 |
600 U pepsin |
Example 2 |
pH 4 with 89 2 0 0.5 23 3.7 |
1200 U pepsin |
______________________________________ |
The addition of pepsin causes a reduction of the ACA, a lessening of the blood pressure drop in the rat model as well as a reduction in C1q binding activity.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10059759, | Apr 22 2010 | Biotest AG | Antibody preparations |
10954290, | Apr 22 2010 | Biotest AG | IgG, IgA and IgM antibody preparations, method of making and method of use in treatment |
11780909, | Apr 22 2010 | Biotest AG | Methods of treating viral infections by administering an antibody preparation comprising IGG, IGA and IGM |
7709615, | Jul 15 2003 | Chugai Seiyaku Kabushiki Kaisha | Polynucleotides encoding anti-ganglioside antibodies |
7803914, | Oct 09 2003 | Chugai Seiyaku Kabushiki Kaisha | Methods for stabilizing protein solutions |
8142780, | Aug 20 1998 | STROX Biopharmaceuticals, LLC | Anti-bacterial antibodies |
8257703, | Jul 15 2003 | Chugai Seiyaku Kabushiki Kaisha | Anti-ganglioside antibodies and compositions |
8852585, | Jan 30 2006 | GRIFOLS THERAPEUTICS LLC | Method of treatment and prophylaxis of diseases related to amyloid deposition using IgM |
8900806, | Apr 22 2010 | Biotest AG | Antibody preparations |
8920797, | Oct 09 2003 | Chugai Seiyaku Kabushiki Kaisha | Highly concentrated stabilized IgM solution |
9243056, | Apr 22 2010 | Biotest AG | Process for preparing an immunoglobulin composition |
9416172, | Jun 03 2014 | XBIOTECH, INC ; XBIOTECH INC | Compositions and methods for treating and preventing Staphylococcus aureus infections |
9518110, | Apr 22 2010 | Biotest AG | Antibody preparations |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4075193, | Nov 26 1976 | IMMUNO AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT FUR CHEMISCH-MEDIZINISCHE PRODUKE | Process for producing intravenous immune globulin |
5075425, | Aug 17 1989 | Biotest Pharma GmbH | Process for the preparation of a pharmaceutical which contains IgG, IgA and IgM and can be administered intravenously |
EP13901, | |||
EP120835, | |||
EP221505, | |||
EP352500, | |||
EP413188, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Feb 23 1999 | RENTSCH, MARKUS | ROTKREUZSTIFTUNG ZENTRALLABOATORIUM BLUTSPENDEDIENST SRK | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010021 | /0748 | |
Feb 23 1999 | RENTSCH, MARKUS | Rotkreuzstiftung Zentrallaboratorium Blutspendedienst SRK | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010210 | /0311 | |
Apr 07 1999 | Rotkreuzstifung Zentrallaboratorium Blutspendedienst SRK | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
May 18 2001 | Rotkreuzstiftung Zentrallaboratorium Blutspendedienst SRK | ZLB Bioplasma AG | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 011962 | /0072 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
May 12 2004 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Oct 25 2004 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 24 2003 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 24 2004 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 24 2004 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 24 2006 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 24 2007 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 24 2008 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 24 2008 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 24 2010 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 24 2011 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 24 2012 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 24 2012 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 24 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |