The invention relates to a suction-effect radial-discharge funnel-shaped nozzle. It comprises, in series, an injector (2) to supply a fluid and a spreading cone (1), whose tip resides in front of a discharge mouth of said injector, as well as a funnel-shaped housing (3) encasing them. According to the invention, the discharge annulus of the nozzle is reduced along the mantle surface of the cone starting from the tip thereof, with a constant annular flow area being maintained along the flow.
|
1. A suction-effect radial-discharge funnel-shaped nozzle comprising:
a housing having a pipe section and a funnel-shaped section having an inner surface, said pipe section connectable to a gas supply; an injector co-axially positioned within said pipe section for supplying a fluid to be mixed with the gas supplied to said pipe section, said injector including a discharge orifice; a cone for spreading the fluid/gas mixture prior to radial discharge from the nozzle, said cone having a cone tip, a cone base, and an outer surface arranged so that said cone tip is positioned in front of said discharge orifice of said injector, and wherein said funnel-shaped section of said housing encases said cone to define an annular gap between said inner surface of said funnel-shaped section and said outer surface of said cone, the width of said gap being continuously reduced in the direction from said tip to said base of said cone to maintain a constant annular flow area between the cone and the funnel-shaped section in the direction of flow from cone tip to cone base.
|
The invention relates to a suction-effect radial-discharge funnel-shaped nozzle comprising, in series, an injector to supply a fluid and a spreading cone, whose tip resides in front of a discharge mouth of the said injector, as well as a funnel-shaped housing encasing them.
Nozzles of the type as set forth above serve for dividing, distributing, dispensing and/or dispersing a gas in a fluid e.g. in flotation plants.
A nozzle of the above type is known from EP 0 035 243. The known nozzle is characterized by a convergent-divergent mixing chamber having a constant hydraulic diameter, so that by increasing the circumference a diffuser is created. It is characteristic of the known nozzle that by means thereof no such quantity of gas can be sucked that the ratio of the flows of the fluid and of the sucked gas would be 1 nor is it possible to produce bubbles of a relatively small magnitude (about 150 microns). In practice, all these features of the known nozzle together limit the possibilities of use for the nozzle.
It is an object of the present invention to modify the above-mentioned comparable design of a nozzle so that its sucking characteristics will be altered to result in a significantly broader field of use.
When searching for a solution to improve the characteristics of the funnel-shaped nozzle it was surprisingly found that the suction effect of the nozzle was markedly higher if an annulus between a cone-shaped spreading element and a housing was continuously reduced towards the exit. The reduction of the said annulus was such that the annular flow area along the cone was maintained constant.
As to the term "hydraulic diameter" mentioned above:
A quotient of an area of stream cross section and a wetted perimeter is called hydraulic radius. A hydraulic diameter is a product of four hydraulic radii.
Hereinafter, the invention is disclosed in more detail by means of an embodiment shown in the drawing. In the drawing:
FIG. 1 is partly an elevational axial section and partly an elevational View of the inventive nozzle,
FIG. 2 is a graph of suction effect characteristics, and
FIG. 3 is a graph of nozzle capacities.
Basically, the nozzle is composed of three mutually coaxial component members: a spreading cone 1 having a tip angle of 90°, an injector 2 of an inner diameter d for supplying a liquid, and a shaped housing 3 common to both first-mentioned members. A part of the housing 3 residing at the injector 2 together with the latter forms an annulus for supplying a gas, and a part of the housing 3 residing at the cone 1 together with the mantle surface of the latter forms an annulus for discharging the fluid/gas dispersion.
The fundamental feature of the invention i.e. that the flow area of the annulus between the cone 1 and the housing 3 is constant in axial direction, can be carried out according to the invention by a plurality of approaches. In the embodiment shown the cone 1 is an elementary geometrical body so that a spacing of an inner mantle surface of the funnel-shaped part of the housing 3 is defined depending on the mantle surface of the said cone. In the arrangement as shown the said spacing equals Dh at the location where it is smallest i.e. prior to entering a radial gap of the nozzle.
Added to the cone 1 and the housing 3, respectively, are D-diameter flanges that mutually define a radial discharge gap of the nozzle.
Pressurized water is supplied through the injector 2 onto the tip of the cone 1. A low pressure is established in a hole existing between the injector 2, the cone 1 and the housing 3, which results in suction of gas through the housing 3 into the spread flow of the fluid. From here on the fluid and the gas flow in the form of a fluid/gas dispersion.
FIG. 2 diagrammatically shows relations between the Froude numbers (Fr') and the quotients of a gas flow (qG) and a liquid flow (qL) more specifically the suction effect characteristics of funnel-shaped nozzles. Line A indicates the characteristics of an embodiment having a constant hydraulic diameter (prior art) and lines B and C indicate the characteristics of a nozzle having a constant flow area of an annulus according to the invention. Evidently, the ratio of the gas flow vs. liquid flow according to the invention is not only increased to 1, but increased for a factor of about 4.
FIG. 3 shows a Δp* ·d2 /Sh vs. E* Frh1/3 diagramm with the symbols explained below. The tests made by using several funnel-type nozzles (D=100 mm, 200 mm, 300 mm) of the respective design confirmed the proposition that beyond a certain critical value all funnel-type nozzles having a constant flow area operate equally well.
The symbols used in FIGS. 2-3 have the following meaning:
Dh =Da -Di
Sh =Da2 -Di2
Frh =qL ·ρ/d4 (ρgH+ΔpG)
Δp* =ΔpL /(ρgH'+ΔpG)
E* =qG (ρgH'+ΔpG)/qL ·ΔpL
Da outer diameter
Di inner diameter
qG gas flow
qL liquid flow
ρ liquid density
g acceleration of gravity
H extent of water column over nozzle
ΔpG gas-side pressure drop
ΔpL liquid-side pressure drop
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10322383, | Mar 06 2015 | FLUID QUIP KS, LLC | Radial flow processor and method for using same |
6613195, | May 12 1998 | KOBAYASHI VENTURES LLC | Method for conditioning paper and paperboard webs |
7125473, | Sep 12 2003 | International Paper Company | Apparatus and method for conditioning a web on a papermaking machine |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
2393328, | |||
2543996, | |||
3731876, | |||
3737105, | |||
4044079, | Nov 20 1974 | Patents and Developments A/S | Drop line devices |
4162971, | Jul 31 1976 | Bayer Aktiengesellschaft | Injectors with deflectors for their use in gassing liquids |
4534862, | Mar 05 1980 | Bayer Aktiengesellschaft | Apparatus for flotation |
JP6226145, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Oct 29 1998 | SUSA, JANEZ | SUSSA D O O | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010173 | /0032 | |
Nov 05 1998 | Janez, Susa | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Apr 13 2000 | SUSSA D O O | SUSZA, JANEZ | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010763 | /0597 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Apr 08 2004 | M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
Dec 07 2007 | M2552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Yr, Small Entity. |
Jun 25 2012 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Nov 14 2012 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Nov 14 2003 | 4 years fee payment window open |
May 14 2004 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 14 2004 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Nov 14 2006 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Nov 14 2007 | 8 years fee payment window open |
May 14 2008 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 14 2008 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Nov 14 2010 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Nov 14 2011 | 12 years fee payment window open |
May 14 2012 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 14 2012 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Nov 14 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |