A pedestrian impact sensor system for a motor vehicle comprises sensor (4) for measuring the loads acting simultaneously on different regions across the front of the vehicle to produce pressure patterns (12a and 12b). The system includes a signal processor (14) for monitoring changes in measured pressure patterns over time, and for comparing these changes with data characteristic of pedestrian collisions. If a correspondence is identified, a signal is sent to activate a cushioning device (16).
|
10. A method for detecting pedestrian impact with a motor vehicle, comprising:
measuring loads acting simultaneously across the front of the vehicle to produce a pressure pattern; monitoring changes in measured pressure patterns over time; comparing the changing pressure patterns with stored data for changing pressure patterns characteristic of pedestrian collisions to determine if there is a correspondence; and sending a triggering signal to activate a cushioning device if a correspondence is identified.
11. A pedestrian protection system for a motor vehicle, comprising:
a cushioning device for cushioning an impact with a pedestrian, being actuatable by a triggering signal; sensing means for measuring the loads acting simultaneously on different regions across the front of the vehicle to produce a pressure pattern; means for monitoring changes in measured pressure patterns over time; means for comparing the changing pressure patterns with stored data for changing pressure patterns characteristic of pedestrian collisions; and means for sending a triggering signal to the cushioning device when a correspondence is identified between a measured changing pressure pattern and stored data.
1. A pedestrian impact sensing system for a motor vehicle comprising:
a front end assembly mounted on a front end of the vehicle; a cushioning device mounted to the vehicle; memory means for storing pressure pattern data characteristic of pedestrian collisions; sensing means for measuring the loads acting simultaneously on different regions across the front end assembly to produce a pressure pattern; means for monitoring changes in measured pressure patterns over time; means for comparing the changing pressure patterns with stored pressure pattern data; and means for sending a triggering signal for activating the cushioning device when a correspondence is identified between the monitored changing pressure pattern and stored pressure pattern data.
2. A pedestrian impact sensing system as claimed in
3. A pedestrian impact sensing system as claimed in
4. A pedestrian impact sensing system as claimed in
5. A pedestrian impact sensing system as claimed in
6. A pedestrian impact sensing system as claimed in
7. A pedestrian impact sensing system as claimed in
8. A pedestrian impact sensing system as claimed in
9. A pedestrian impact sensing system as claimed in
|
The present invention relates to an impact sensor system for use in triggering operation of a deployable device for protecting a pedestrian hit by the front of a vehicle. The invention also relates to an impact sensing method and to a pedestrian protection system which employs the impact sensor system.
When a pedestrian is hit by a motor vehicle, for example a car, one type of injury can be caused by a subsequent collision between the pedestrian's head and the hood of the vehicle. Many impact protection systems have been devised to reduce the effects of such collisions, for example hood-mounted airbags or energy-absorbing hood panels. Such deployable systems will be referred to as cushioning devices.
Cushioning devices require a sensor to be used to detect pedestrian impacts, and it is highly desirable for that sensor to discriminate between impact with a pedestrian and other types of impact. The decision of whether to deploy or not to deploy must be made in a very short space of time after detecting an initial impact at the front of the vehicle.
One pedestrian impact sensor system which has been proposed is described in International Patent Application No. WO 97/18108. This system uses a first sensor on the front bumper (fender) and a second sensor on the front edge of the hood of the vehicle. By measuring the time difference between triggering of the first sensor and triggering of the second sensor, and the magnitudes of the signals from those sensors, the system can distinguish between impacts with pedestrians and other sorts of impacts.
It is necessary for there to be an impact between the pedestrian and the vehicle hood before any deployment of a safety device can be triggered.
According to an aspect of the present invention there is provided a pedestrian impact sensing system for a motor vehicle comprising: a front end assembly mounted on a front end of the vehicle; a cushioning device mounted to the vehicle; memory means for storing pressure pattern data characteristic of pedestrian collisions; sensing means for measuring the loads acting simultaneously on different regions across the front end assembly to produce a pressure pattern; means for monitoring changes in measured pressure patterns over time; means for comparing the changing pressure patterns with stored pressure pattern data; and means for sending a triggering signal for activating the cushioning device when a correspondence is identified between the monitored changing pressure pattern and stored pressure pattern data.
By measuring a changing pressure pattern across the front of the vehicle, it is not necessary to detect collision with the hood of the vehicle.
Preferably the sensing means are located in the front bumper of the vehicle. This permits the use of a single pressure sensitive matrix associated with the bumper. For convenience hereinafter the invention will be described with reference to a pressure sensitive matrix in a front bumper. However, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to this embodiment.
The pressure pattern, rather than the magnitude of loading of individual matrix cells, principally characterises a pedestrian impact, while the change of pressure pattern with time provides discrimination data relating to magnitude. An advantage of this system is that variation in material properties of the bumper system, for example due to environmental effects or manufacturing variation, may affect the magnitude of load measured by individual cells, but will not significantly affect the pressure pattern.
The comparison means preferably comprises a neural network, which is particularly able to be adaptable to complex cases. However, a conventional algorithm could also be used.
Suitable known matrix technologies may be used for the pressure sensitive matrix, for example force-sensitive resistors, capacitive arrays, strain gauges and piezo-resistive or capacitive load cells.
The pressure sensitive matrix may be sandwiched between a rigid bumper beam and the bumper cover or trim panel. An energy absorbing module, for example a foam module, is preferably held under compression against the matrix. The matrix may be sandwiched between the foam module and the bumper beam, between the foam module and the bumper cover, or within the foam module.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the bumper is provided with a plurality of discrete loading features, each corresponding to a region of the bumper where an element of the pressure pattern is to be measured. Each loading feature may comprise a projection in the bumper cover, in the foam module, or in the pressure sensitive matrix. The loading features improve load transmission to the sensor elements of the matrix.
Any vehicle systems that use a radiated field (for example radar, infrared, ultrasound, or microwave) to establish conditions outside the vehicle exterior could be used as a low-level trigger to activate a high processing rate in the impact sensor system. For example, if an automatic cruise control system sensed relative movement between the vehicle and an external object, the pedestrian impact sensor could commit system resources to discriminating an impact, given the higher level of event confidence gained. This information could also be used in the deployment decision-making process, similar to an interior airbag controller's "safing" sensor.
A further aspect of the present invention provides a method for detecting pedestrian impact with a motor vehicle, comprising: measuring loads acting simultaneously across the front of the vehicle to produce a pressure pattern; monitoring changes in measured pressure patterns over time; comparing the changing pressure patterns with stored data for changing pressure patterns characteristic of pedestrian collisions to determine if there is a correspondence; and sending a triggering signal to activate a cushioning device if a correspondence is identified.
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a pedestrian protection system for a motor vehicle, comprising: a cushioning device for cushioning an impact with a pedestrian, being actuatable by a triggering signal; sensing means for measuring the loads acting simultaneously on different regions across the front of the vehicle to produce a pressure pattern; means for monitoring changes in measured pressure patterns over time; means for comparing the changing pressure patterns with stored data for changing pressure patterns characteristic of pedestrian collisions; and means for sending a triggering signal to the cushioning device when a correspondence is identified between a measured changing pressure pattern and stored data.
The invention will now be further described, by way of example, with reference to the following drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is an exploded view of a vehicle bumper for use in a pedestrian impact sensor system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a view from the rear of a portion of the foam module of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a sectional view along the line A--A of FIG. 2;
FIG. 4 shows graphically an example of information presented by sensing means to a signal processor in a pedestrian impact sensor system in accordance the first embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 5a shows a schematic view of a pedestrian protection system in accordance with the first embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 5b shows a schematic view similar to FIG. 5a, but illustrating a second embodiment of the present invention; and
FIG. 5C shows a schematic view similar to FIG. 5a, but illustrating a third embodiment of the present invention.
Referring to FIGS. 1-5a, a vehicle bumper portion 1 of a front end assembly is shown that comprises a rigid beam 2 and a cover 8. Sandwiched between the beam 2 and the cover 8 are a pressure sensitive matrix 4 and a foam module 6. The foam module 6 is held in compression against the pressure sensitive matrix 4 so that the force of an impact of an object against the cover 8 is partially transmitted to the matrix 4.
To facilitate force transmission in predetermined apart loading features 10, comprising molded projections or nubs. Each projection corresponds to a region where a pressure reading will be taken and which will map to a picture element in a pressure pattern.
Examples of the type of pressure patterns transmitted from the pressure sensitive matrix 4 to the signal processor 14 are shown in FIG. 4. Picture elements from left to right as viewed correspond to sensing regions-across the bumper 1, and picture elements from top to bottom as viewed correspond to sensing regions up and down the bumper 1. The left hand pressure pattern 12a is measured at about five microseconds after an impact, and the right hand pressure pattern 12b is measured at about fifteen microseconds. In this illustration, each picture element can have only three states, namely high, medium, and low pressure. It would of course be possible to make the system more discriminating by measuring finer differences in pressure, or by providing a greater density of sensing regions. This increased discrimination would be at the cost of increasing the necessary processing resources to analyse the greater amount of data in the changing pressure patterns. The allocation of higher processing resources to the pedestrian impact system could be increased in response to a signal from a vehicle system which detects relative movement between the vehicle and an external object.
When the pressure patterns 12a and/or 12b are detected, the system shown in FIG. 5a, the pressure sensitive matrix 4 sends pressure information for each loading feature 10 to a signal processor 14, for example a neural network. The signal processor 14 monitors changes in the pressure patterns over time and determines whether a correspondence exists between the changing pressure pattern and stored data for changing pressure patterns characteristic of pedestrian collisions. If a correspondence is identified, the signal processor sends a triggering signal to a cushioning device 16, for example a hood-mounted airbag, so that the cushioning device is deployed.
FIGS. 5b and 5c illustrate alternate embodiments of the present invention. As illustrated in FIG. 5b, the pressure sensitive matrix 4 may provide a decision or data to a central airbag controller 17, which then has the ability to trigger deployment of the airbag 16. Alternatively, as is illustrated in FIG. 5c, the airbag controller 17 may include the processing capability of the signal processor 14 with itself, and determine the deployment of the cushioning device.
The present invention therefore provides pedestrian sensing and cushioning systems which do not require sensing of hood collision and which are tolerant of manufacturing and environmental variations. Thus, while certain embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail, those familiar with the art to which this invention relates will recognise various alternative designs and embodiments for practicing the invention as defined by the following claims.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
6668962, | May 18 2001 | Hyundai Motor Company | Hood hanging structure for a vehicle |
6746074, | Jun 25 2003 | Key Safety Systems, Inc | Pedestrian protecting device for a vehicle |
6784792, | Jun 21 2000 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Method and device for recognition of a collision with a pedestrian |
6828697, | Apr 06 2001 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Device for protecting a pedestrian |
6848738, | Jun 25 2003 | Key Safety Systems, Inc | Vehicle structure for pedestrian protection |
7287618, | Jul 26 2005 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Collision object protection assembly |
7400958, | Jul 11 2002 | Robert Bosch GmbH | System for triggering restraining means |
7415337, | Jul 26 2005 | Aptiv Technologies AG | Method and apparatus for detecting a pedestrian impact |
7488015, | Dec 22 2004 | BMW AG | Vehicle systems and methods for detecting pedestrian impacts |
7597352, | Nov 18 2004 | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. | Vehicle passenger restraining system |
7630806, | May 23 1994 | AMERICAN VEHICULAR SCIENCES LLC | System and method for detecting and protecting pedestrians |
7631565, | Oct 26 2006 | Denso Corporation | Collision detection system |
7664609, | Aug 14 2002 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Device for impact sensing having at least two pressure sensors |
7677080, | Feb 02 2006 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Dual mode contact sensor for automotive vehicle |
7686358, | Dec 24 2003 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Vehicular bumper structure |
7721838, | Apr 01 2005 | Denso Corporation | Collision obstacle discrimination device for vehicle |
7734393, | Sep 21 2004 | Takata Corporation | Object struck discrimination system and protection system |
7828350, | Jul 17 2007 | Denso Corporation | Vehicular collision detection apparatus |
7831357, | Mar 19 2003 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Apparatus for triggering restraint devices |
7881843, | Sep 21 2004 | Takata Corporation | Object struck discrimination system and protection system |
8041483, | Apr 21 2005 | Automotive Technologies International, Inc | Exterior airbag deployment techniques |
8398133, | Oct 28 2010 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Pressure-based crash detection system incorporated in side rail |
8447474, | May 23 1994 | AMERICAN VEHICULAR SCIENCES LLC | Exterior airbag deployment techniques |
8473188, | Feb 20 2007 | Denso Corporation | Vehicle collision detecting system |
8577555, | Sep 23 2011 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Dual-chamber impact detector |
8690208, | Oct 28 2010 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Pressure-based crash detection system incorporated in side rail |
8960742, | Oct 28 2010 | Ford Global Technologies, LLC | Pressure-based crash detection system incorporated in side rail |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3853199, | |||
5040633, | Dec 08 1989 | Device for automatic brake of a vehicle on striking an obstacle | |
5555512, | Aug 19 1993 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Picture processing apparatus for processing infrared pictures obtained with an infrared ray sensor and applied apparatus utilizing the picture processing apparatus |
5794975, | Jan 25 1996 | Daimler AG | Motor vehicle impact passenger protection arrangement |
DE2454389, | |||
DE2711338, | |||
DE2821156, | |||
DE4320226, | |||
JP7108903, | |||
WO9718108, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Apr 23 1999 | Jaguar Cars Limited | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Apr 23 1999 | STRIDE, KEVIN JOHN | Jaguar Cars Limited | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 009991 | /0462 | |
Dec 28 2012 | Jaguar Cars Limited | Jaguar Land Rover Limited | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 033271 | /0106 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Sep 29 2004 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Sep 18 2008 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Sep 24 2012 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Apr 03 2004 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Oct 03 2004 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 03 2005 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Apr 03 2007 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Apr 03 2008 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Oct 03 2008 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 03 2009 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Apr 03 2011 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Apr 03 2012 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Oct 03 2012 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 03 2013 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Apr 03 2015 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |