A satellite solar array performance optimizing system that isolates a subsection of a solar array to provide power during transfer orbit operation, then connects the subsection in series with an adjacent section to maintain maximum power output at the satellite operating bus voltage. The isolated subsection is provided on an outer panel populated with solar cells in series calculated according to the parameters of the satellite mission to provide maximum power output matching the operating bus voltage. The outer panel subsection of solar cells is connected directly to the operation bus by a passive diode or a mechanical switch such as a latching relay. An adjacent or intermediate panel has a section of solar cells that are connected in series with the subsection of the outer panel and connected through a blocking diode to the operating bus. The intermediate panel is populated with solar cells calculated to complement the solar cells subsection on the outer panel so that they maintain the power requirements of the operating bus when the satellite reaches its final orbit and the solar panels are deployed. The outer panel, intermediate panel and inner panel are populated with solar cells calculated to maintain the power throughout the life of the satellite.

Patent
   6218605
Priority
Apr 23 1997
Filed
Apr 23 1997
Issued
Apr 17 2001
Expiry
Apr 23 2017
Assg.orig
Entity
Small
70
10
all paid
8. A satellite comprising:
an electrical operation bus having a minimum voltage requirement;
a plurality of solar cells connected in series;
an outer solar panel populated with a first subsection of said plurality, said first subsection comprising X solar cells connected in series;
a second panel populated with a second subsection of said plurality, said second subsection comprising Y solar cells connected in series;
switching means connecting said first subsection directly to said bus when said solar panels are stowed and automatically connecting said first and second subsections in series to said bus when said solar panels are deployed;
wherein X is approximately the number of solar cells required during transfer orbit operation to provide generally said minimum voltage requirement, and X+Y is approximately the number of solar cells required during end-of-life operation to provide generally said minimum voltage requirement.
7. A satellite solar array performance optimizing system comprising:
a plurality of solar panels populated with solar cells calculated to maintain a power output to match an operating bus voltage of a satellite to its end of life, said plurality of solar panels having an outer panel and a second panel;
said outer panel being populated with a subsection of solar cells calculated from mission parameters of the satellite to provide a maximum power output at the operating bus voltage of the satellite during transfer orbit operation;
said second panel being populated with a subsection of solar cells calculated to complement the output of said outer panel subsection of solar cells when said plurality of panels are deployed to thereby provide a power output that matches the operating bus voltage of the satellite at its end of life;
switching means connecting said outer panel subsection of solar cells directly to said satellite operating bus when said panels are stowed and automatically connecting said outer panel subsection of solar cells and said second panel subsection of solar cells in series to said bus when said solar panels are deployed.
15. A method of optimizing the performance of a satellite solar array comprising:
calculating the number of solar cells in series required during transfer orbit operation to provide maximum power output at the operating bus voltage of a satellite;
populating an outer panel subsection with the number of solar cells calculated;
connecting said outer panel subsection of solar cells directly to an operating bus of said satellite to bypass the remaining cells in said satellite solar array during transfer orbit operation;
calculating the number of solar cells In series required to populate a second solar panel subsection connected to said outer solar panel subsection of solar cells that will complement the output of said outer panel subsection of solar cells when said solar panels are deployed and jointly provide at the end of the life of the satellite a power output that matches the operating bus voltage of the satellite;
populating said second solar panel subsection with the number of solar cells calculated;
providing connecting means that automatically connects said outer panel subsection and said second panel subsection in series to said bus when said solar panels are deployed.
1. A satellite solar array performance optimizing system comprising:
an outer solar panel populated with a subsection of solar cells in series calculated to provide maximum power output that matches a voltage on an operating bus of a satellite during transfer orbit operation;
an intermediate solar panel having a section of solar cells in series with said subsection of solar cells in series on said outer panel, said section of solar cells in series on said intermediate solar panel calculated to complement the output of said outer solar panel subsection of solar cells in series to provide maximum power output matching said operating bus voltage when said solar panels are deployed;
switching means connecting said outer panel subsection of solar cells directly to said bus when said solar panels are stowed and automatically connecting said outer panel subsection of solar cells and said intermediate panel section of solar cells in series to said bus when said solar panels are deployed;
an inner solar panel having a section of solar cells connected in series and calculated to provide maximum power output in conjunction with said outer solar panel subsection of solar cells in series and said intermediate solar panel section of solar cells in series when deployed that provides maximum power output matching said satellite operating bus voltage throughout an operating life of said satellite.
2. The system of claim 1 in which said switching means comprises a bypass diode connected in parallel with said intermediate panel section of solar cells.
3. The system according to claim 2 in which said intermediate solar panel section of solar cells in series and said inner solar panel are connected to said satellite operating bus through blocking diodes.
4. The system according to claim 3 in which said inner solar panel section of solar cells is connected in parallel with said outer panel subsection of solar cells in series and said intermediate solar panel section of solar cells in series.
5. The system according to claim 3 in which said outer panel subsection of solar cells in series is populated with solar cells that constitute a range of sixty percent to seventy-five percent (60% to 75%) of the number of solar cells in series constituting said outer panel subsection of solar cells in series and said intermediate solar panel section of solar cells in series.
6. The system of claim 1 in which said switching means comprises a mechanical switch.
9. The system of claim 8 in which said switching means comprises a bypass diode connected in parallel with said second subsection of solar cells.
10. The system of claim 8 in which said switching means comprises a mechanical switch.
11. The system of claim 8 in which the value of (X/(X+Y)) is between 0.6 and 0.75.
12. The system of claim 8, further comprising a third subsection of solar cells connected to said bus, said third subsection having approximately X+Y solar cells connected in series.
13. The system according to claim 12 in which said second subsection of solar cells in series and said third subsection of solar cells in series are connected to said satellite operating bus through blocking diodes.
14. The system according to claim 12 in which said third subsection of solar cells is connected in parallel with said first subsection of solar cells in series and said second subsection of solar cells in series.

This invention relates to optimizing power output of satellite solar arrays and more particularly relates to a method and apparatus to optimize solar array performance with passive diode switching of different states of a satellite mission.

Satellites are usually launched with their solar arrays stowed against the spacecraft sidewalls to fit within the launch vehicle. In this configuration, most of the power from the solar array is not available because there is no exposure to the sun. However, usually an outboard portion of the solar array is stored so that it's outward facing end produces some power from whatever sunlight reaches it during the initial phase, also known as "transfer orbit" (i.e., transfer from the as-launched orbit to the preferred mission orbit).

Solar arrays on satellites generally have three phases of operation. The first phase is the stowed configuration, in which the solar panels of the array are folded, concealed and compacted into a small area that accommodates fitting the satellite into the launch vehicle's cargo space. For maneuvering purposes, the solar panels are maintained in a stowed position until the satellite is properly placed in its final orbit. The time between launch of the satellite and it reaching its final orbit is generally referred to as "transfer orbit." The second phase of operation is deployment of the solar panels once the satellite is comfortably situated in it's destination orbit. The last and third phase constitutes the deployed panels at the end of the satellite's useful life.

Typically, the size of solar arrays are designed for their end-of-life (EOL) voltage and power requirements to meet the minimum voltage and power requirements of the satellite's electrical operation bus. That is, the maximum EOL power output of the solar array should meet the minimum power requirements of the satellite's electrical operation bus. The present method of meeting this EOL requirement necessarily means some degree of over-design at the BOL (beginning-of-life). Therefore, to provide sufficient EOL voltage the design will produce as much as twenty-five percent (25%) excessive voltage output at the BOL. Since standard satellite power regulation electronics operate at a constant voltage, the excessive voltage differential is wasted during BOL operation.

Solar cells are also temperature dependent devices and their running temperature depends on satellite orbit location and solar array geometry. At EOL, a deployed solar array operates at about 50°C which goes into the design analysis to meet the satellite minimum voltage requirement. Thus, during transfer orbit with the solar array not yet deployed and held tightly against the spinning satellite, as described above (typical stowed configuration) the solar array operates at about -20°C This 70°C temperature difference (-20°C to +50°C) further exacerbates the voltage differential noted above. The BOL voltage can be as much as sixty percent (60%) above the constant operating voltage required. This effectively amplifies the mismatch between the satellite constant voltage required and the voltage supplied leaving as much as a third or more of the voltage that cannot be traversed.

Therefore, one object of the present invention is to optimize solar array performance throughout the life of a satellite mission.

Another object of the present invention is to optimize solar array performance so as to provide maximum power output that matches the satellite's operation bus voltage during transfer orbit operation.

An object is also to optimize solar array power performance by selectively isolating non-contributing sections of a solar array to maintain the maximum power output of the stowed, BOL solar array.

A solar array power output is optimized as another object of the present invention by isolating a subsection of the solar array during transfer orbit operation and then connecting the subsection in series with another section to provide maximum power output that matches the power of the satellite operating bus at deployed EOL.

The solar array power output is optimized by connecting a subsection of the solar array through a switching device that automatically connects the subsection to the full array upon deployment of the solar panel of a satellite. Preferably, the switching devices are passive elements such as bypass diodes connecting sections of a solar array to the satellite's operating bus.

The purpose of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus to optimize the performance and power output of solar arrays on panels through all phases of the satellite mission from launch transfer orbit and final destination orbit of a satellite.

The solar arrays, on the solar panels of a satellite, produce power commensurate with the three phases of operation described hereinabove as transfer orbit operation, deployed operation at BOL and deployed operation at EOL. The power produced during transfer orbit is severely restricted due to the limited area exposed to the sun. Only the outermost panels will be exposed to the sun, while the other panels that are stowed are hidden from the sun (shaded by the outermost panels). Furthermore, the exposed solar panel is generally not normal to the sun and experiences a cosine angle related loss of power. Further, the satellite is often spinning during transfer orbit, which further reduces the power output from the solar array (called a one-over Pi loss). The satellite is usually maneuvering itself into its destination orbit during this transfer period, which generally precludes the outermost solar panel from tracking the sun.

During the second phase, the satellite is now in its final destination orbit, and the solar panels are fully deployed and tracking the sun so they produce maximum solar array power. In nearly all cases, the power produced in this phase is excessive and only a portion of the array's power is gathered. The deployment stage is often referred to as "beginning of-life" (BOL) stage.

The third phase, or "end-of-life" (EOL) stage is the stage at which the solar arrays have been degraded in power as the result of their useful operation in the space environment due to radiation. Generally, the solar arrays are sized such that the EOL power is just enough to power the satellite's load requirements. This power is generally equivalent to the partially utilized power in the BOL stage.

Critical factors in the analysis of power are the operating voltage of the satellite and the maximum power voltage of the solar arrays. Generally, the solar arrays are designed to have an EOL maximum power voltage that matches the satellite's operating bus voltage. The EOL maximum power voltage of the solar array is a function of the solar cells'maximum power voltage, the degradation factors associated with the satellite orbit and the EOL phase, the operating temperature of the solar cells at EOL and thus, the number of solar cells in series. A problem that is often encountered is that the solar arrays' BOL maximum power voltage is much higher than the satellite's bus voltage due to the non-degradation state of the solar. Cells and due to the more efficient cold operating temperature of the solar arrays (caused by spinning and off angle cosine).

A solution to this problem is to isolate sections of the solar array and then bring them on-line or switch them into the circuit when they are needed to maintain the maximum power output matching the operating bus voltage of the satellite. Thus, by using switching devices, a subsection of a solar array can be kept in the circuit to provide maximum power voltage that matches the satellite's operating bus voltage through all phases of operation. This solution involves populating the solar panels of a solar array with the number of solar cells needed to maintain the maximum power output at the operating voltage of the satellite's operating bus, and connecting them in the circuit as needed.

To start, the outermost panel is fully populated with circuits having the appropriate number of solar cells in series such that their maximum power voltage during first phase or transfer orbit operation is matched to the satellite's operating bus voltage. This first subsection is connected to the operating bus through a switching device such as a passive diode. This design extracts maximum power that the outermost solar panel can produce while isolating (i.e., "switching" out non-productive sections of the solar array).

The solar cell population of the outermost panel is calculated from the design parameters of the satellite's mission. That is, the particular orbit that it will be in and its relation to factors in space that can cause degradation such as the Van Allen radiation belt. Once the satellite operating bus voltage and the mission parameters are determined, the number of cells needed to populate the outermost panel can be calculated. This allows the size of the solar cells in the array to be maximized, thereby minimizing solar array costs. The number and size of cells populating the outermost panel will thus provide maximum power output matching the operating bus voltage throughout the first phase or transfer orbit operation.

Continuation or complementary circuits are provided by an adjacent or intermediate panel, or the next inward panel (via standard flex cables which already exist) populated with a sufficient number of solar cells in series as a continuation circuit to meet the EOL maximum power voltage required for the life of the satellite. Generally, the next inward or intermediate panel is in the dark throughout the transfer orbit operation and is therefore, non-productive and isolated or "switched out" of the circuit. Preferably, the switching device is a bypass diode connecting the outer panel solar cell subsection directly to the operating bus. The intermediate panel is populated with a series of solar cells that are also connected in series with the outer subsection of cells so that when the solar panel is deployed, the outer panel subsection of solar cells in series and combined with the intermediate panel section of solar cells provide the maximum power output that matches the operating bus voltage.

A first bypass diode in parallel with the continuation or complementary circuit of the intermediate panel prevents the intermediate (i.e., middle) panel from limiting the current flow from the outer panel while they are in the dark during the transfer orbit operation phase.

Subsequent inner panels are populated with sufficient solar cells in series to maintain the maximum power output of all the entire solar array to match the satellite operating bus voltage. The bypass diodes, which are relatively inexpensive, do not adversely affect reliability and contribute an insignificant weight increase. Weight is a critical problem in the construction of satellites with each pound adding substantial costs to the effort to place the satellite in orbit. An additional advantage of bypass diodes is that they are passive in operation and utilize existing real estate (on the back side of the solar panels). The design of the system, disclosed and described herein, is flexible with the maximum power voltages of the EOL and transfer orbit phases.

The above and other novel features of the invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram illustrating the solar array performance optimizing system of the invention.

FIG. 2 is a simplified diagram of the system illustrated in FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating the operation of a solar array subsection during the transfer orbit operation phase.

FIG. 4 is a graph illustrating the reduction in power of a solar array subsection as it warms.

FIG. 5 is a graph illustrating the operation of the system of FIG. 1 when an outer subsection of the solar array is connected in series with an intermediate section as the solar arrays are deployed.

FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating the electrical operation of only the outboard portion of the solar array during transfer orbit.

Referring to the block diagram of FIG. 1, a typical solar array 10 is illustrated and is comprised of an outboard panel 12, an intermediate or middle panel 14 and an inboard panel 16. During the first phase of operation, solar panels 12, 14 and 16 are in a stowed configuration with the solar panels folded, concealed or compacted into a small area that accommodates fitting the satellite into the launch vehicle's cargo space. During the first phase, or transfer orbit operation, intermediate panel 14 and in board panel 16 are in the dark and provide no power output to the satellite's operating bus. Generally, if the solar arrays on each of the panels 12, 14 and 16 were all connected in series, no output could be provided to the satellite operating bus until these panels were fully deployed. The reason for this is that the intermediate panel 14 and input panel 16 would be dark and any power output from the outboard panel 12 would be prevented by the inoperative cells in series.

A solution to providing power during transfer orbit operation and optimizing the performance of the solar array is to populate outboard panel 12 with sufficient solar cells calculated to provide maximum power to the operating bus. Solar cell subsection 18 is populated by calculating the number of cells needed based on the mission of the satellite and the voltage required on the operating bus 20. This voltage can be 28V, 32V, 34V, 40V or some other voltage. For purposes of illustration, an operating voltage of approximately 31 volts on operating bus is assumed. To provide 31 volts power output to operating bus 20, solar cell array 18 is populated with sufficient cells to maintain a maximum power output of 31 volts throughout transfer orbit operation. These cells are then connected to the operating bus through bypass diode D1. This allows the power output from series solar cell subsection 18 to match the operating voltage of satellite operating bus 20. Bypass diode D1 bypasses solar cell section 22 in intermediate panel 14.

Solar cells in the array are temperature dependent devices, and their running temperature depends on orbit location and solar array geometry. The deployed solar array 10, at the end-of-life phase (EOL) runs at about 50°C This temperature is used in the design analysis to meet the operating bus 20 voltage requirement at EOL. However, solar array 10 is stowed against a spinning spacecraft in transfer orbit (typical configuration) where it will operate at about -20°C This is approximately a 70°C temperature difference (-20°C to +50°C) which further exacerbates the voltage differential during the different phases of operation. The deployed BOL voltage goes substantially up above the operating bus voltage amplifying the mismatch between the voltage supply and voltage used, leaving a large voltage differential that cannot typically be harnessed.

Solar arrays, such as solar array 10, are typically made up of multiple solar cell string circuits in series that are about 100 cells long (i.e., the voltage of 100 cells adds up to produce the total voltage, e.g., 40 volts at EOL, this is much larger at the BOL). To eliminate the large voltage waste and access the fully stowed voltage capability, one must isolate subsection 18 of the solar array 10. For example, if solar array 10 of 100 cells could produce an output voltage of 64 volts at BOL and the operating bus voltage needed was only 40 volts, subsection 18 would be isolated (i.e., switched out) of solar array 10 to provide the maximum power output to match the voltage of operating bus 20. If solar array 10 could produce as much as 64 volts, and only 40 volts were needed, then the number of cells in subsection 18, needed to produce 40 volts, would be 40/64×100 which would equal approximately 63 cells. To provide this isolation, subsection 18 is populated with the appropriate number of cells to provide a maximum power output matching the operating bus voltage is connected through bypass diode D1 in this case 40 volts. Diode D1 also serves as a blocking diode for the other series of solar cells 22 and 24 and serves as a bypass diode for the series solar cell subsection 18. An outer panel subsection 18 having a ratio in the range of 2/3 to 3/4 of the combined cells (60% to 75%) on the outer and intermediate panels indicated by calculations.

The operation of the system illustrated in FIG. 1 is shown by the simplified schematic diagram of FIG. 2. During transfer orbit, intermediate panel 14, having solar cells 22 and in board panel 16, having solar cells array 24, are in the dark. Solar cell subsection 18, on the outer panel, will be exposed to some sunlight to provide power to operating bus 20. Solar cell subsection 18 on the outer panel, permit sustaining the necessary output power to match the operating bus voltage because of their cold operating temperature at BOL. Thus, solar subsection 18 can supply current to operating bus via bypass diode D1 during transfer orbit operation. Solar subsection 18 can provide the voltage drop between the operating bus 20 and negative bus 21 that matches the operating voltage on the satellite and provide current to operate the satellite circuits. At this time, solar cells subsection 22 and solar subsection 24 are in the dark and provide no power output.

If the outer panel warms (e.g., at deployment) and middle panel 14 is in the dark, the voltage is less than operating bus voltage and no current would be supplied to operate the satellite circuits. To maintain the performance of the solar array and provide an output matching the operating bus voltage at deployment, the series solar cells 22 on the middle panel are populated with sufficient cells calculated to complement the voltage of outer panel subsection 18. When solar array 10 is deployed and the outward panel warms, series solar cells 22 are automatically connected in series with subsection 18. During this period of operation, diode D1 becomes a reverse biased bypass diode allowing the continuation of complementary circuit of solar cells 22 to maintain the maximum power output of solar array 10 at the operating bus voltage. When sunlight illuminates outer panel 12 and intermediate panel 14 at deployment, solar cell subsection 18 is connected in series with continuation circuit of solar cells 22, which will provide sufficient voltage to generate current on operating bus 20.

The different periods of operation are illustrated by the graphs in FIGS. 3 through 5. FIG. 3 illustrates the operation of the solar array during transfer orbit operation. The dotted lines intersect curve 28 at the Vmp indicating maximum power output (about 1.8 amps) to operating bus from solar cell subsection 18 to match the operating bus voltage. At this time, the middle and inner panel power output indicated by curve 30, provide no output because they are in the dark.

If outer panel solar cell subsection 20 warms, the output will drop as illustrated in FIG. 4. Dotted line 32 indicates the voltage of the operating bus while curve 34 shows the degrading voltage of solar subsection 18 dropping below the maximum power. At this time, no current would be supplied to operating bus 32 because the voltage of subsection 18 would drop below the operating bus voltage indicated by dotted line 32.

However, with the system illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2, the operation will be as shown by the graph of FIG. 5. When the solar array 10 is deployed allowing outboard panel 12, intermediate panel 14 and inboard panel 16 to be illuminated with sunlight, the continuing circuit of solar cell array 22 in series with subsection 18, connected to operating bus through diode D2, provides maximum power output to match the operating bus voltage. Vmp indicates the voltage and maximum power output of the entire array. Curve 36 represents the combined output of solar cell subsection 18 and solar cell continuing circuit 22 on the outboard panel 12 and intermediate panel 14. Outer and intermediate panels, 12 and 14 in combination with the in board panel 16, connected in parallel through Diode D3 provide a maximum power output matching the operating bus voltage during the life of the satellite.

A graph illustrating the electrical operation of only the output portion of 18 of the solar array during transfer is shown in FIG. 6. The lower curve indicated at 38 illustrates the effects of having the proper number of solar cells in series to meet the EOL voltage. The maximum power (Vmp) indicated at 42, exceeds the system bus voltage indicated at 40 by virtue of its cold operating temperature and BOL, non-degraded (i.e., non-EOL) performance. The operation of the system is inefficient at operating point 40 (i.e., operating point 42 is not at maximum power).

The operation of the solar system, with fewer cells in series on outboard panel 18, with continuing circuit on the middle shaded panel 22, is illustrated in the curve indicated at 44. The fewer cells in series on outboard panel 18 allows the circuit's maximum power voltage to be matched to the system bus voltage indicated by operating point 46, which is identical to operating point 40. The continuation circuit on middle panel 22, which is shaded during transfer orbit, is passively and temporarily bypassed with bypass diode D1. The fewer cells in series on one or more outboard panels 18, illustrated by operating curve 44, allows more circuits to be placed in parallel on one outboard panel 12 thereby, maximizing current and hence, the maximum operating power (Vmp) point 46 at the system operating bus voltage.

Thus, maximum power (Vmp) matches the operating bus voltage and maximum power is utilized. In contrast, without the configuration of the invention, the maximum power output (Vmp) is at operating point 42, far exceeding the operating bus voltage indicated at operating point 40, and maximum power is not utilized.

The preferred circuit illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2 involves the use of bypass diode D1 to selectively connect subsections of solar array 10 to the operating bus during the various phases of operation of the satellite. Another less desirable option would be to provide a mechanical switch such as a latching relay at junction 40 (FIG. 2) to connect solar cell subsection 18 directly to operating bus 20 during transfer orbit operation. At deployment, the switch would connect continuing solar cell circuit 22 in series with subsection 18 to operating bus 20. However, electrical switching devices are less preferred because they are costly and considered poor reliability risks. A switching circuit that uses latching relays or mechanically activated switches to reconfirm the solar sections could be used. Such a solution is less desirable because it would increase the number of circuits. Further, switches add additional weight and reduce the reliability of the power conditioning circuit. For that reason, passive circuits that can be easily added with minimum additional weight and more reliability are preferred.

Thus, there has been disclosed a method and apparatus for optimizing the performance of a satellite solar array. Performance is optimized by isolating subsections of the solar array and bringing them on-line as needed. In the preferred embodiment, a bypass diode is used to connect a subsection of a solar array to the operating bus to match the power requirements while "switching out" or isolating the rest of the array. As the solar array is deployed when reaching its final destination in orbit, the subsection is connected in series with a continuation circuit of solar cells in an intermediate panel to maintain the maximum power matching the operating bus voltage.

This invention is not to be limited by the embodiment shown in the drawings and described in the description which is given by way of example and not of limitation, but only in accordance with the scope of the appended claims.

Dally, Robert B., Jones, P. Alan

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10032939, Oct 19 2009 AMPT, LLC DC power conversion circuit
10084104, Aug 18 2015 MAXEON SOLAR PTE LTD Solar panel
10116140, Mar 15 2013 AMPT, LLC Magnetically coupled solar power supply system
10326282, Apr 17 2009 AMPT, LLC Safety methods and apparatus for adaptive operation of solar power systems
10326283, Oct 15 2007 AMPT, LLC Converter intuitive photovoltaic electrical energy power system
10388802, Jul 06 2015 SolarOff Systems, LLC System and method for synchronized rapid shutdown of electrical devices
10608437, Oct 15 2007 AMPT, LLC Feedback based photovoltaic conversion systems
10714637, Oct 19 2009 AMPT, LLC DC power conversion circuit
10886746, Oct 15 2007 AMPT, LLC Alternating conversion solar power system
10938219, Apr 17 2009 AMPT, LLC Dynamic methods and apparatus for adaptive operation of solar power systems
11011914, Mar 15 2013 AMPT, LLC Magnetically coupled solar power supply system for battery based loads
11070062, Oct 23 2007 AMPT, LLC Photovoltaic conversion systems
11070063, Oct 15 2007 AMPT, LLC Method for alternating conversion solar power
11070167, Jun 08 2016 MAXEON SOLAR PTE LTD Systems and methods for reworking shingled solar cell modules
11121556, Mar 15 2013 AMPT, LLC Magnetically coupled solar power supply system for battery based loads
11228182, Oct 15 2007 AMPT, LLC Converter disabling photovoltaic electrical energy power system
11289917, Oct 15 2007 AMPT, LLC Optimized photovoltaic conversion system
11411126, Oct 19 2009 AMPT, LLC DC power conversion circuit
11496092, Dec 19 2016 SAFUL CONSULTING, INC Systems, circuits and methods for monitoring and dynamically configuring solar cells
11502642, Jul 30 2015 ARKA ENERGY INC Systems, circuits and methods for harvesting energy from solar cells
11563133, Aug 17 2015 SOLAERO TECHNOLOGIES CORP Method of fabricating multijunction solar cells for space applications
11595000, Nov 08 2012 MAXEON SOLAR PTE LTD High efficiency configuration for solar cell string
11804565, Aug 18 2015 MAXEON SOLAR PTE LTD Solar panel
11901860, Dec 19 2016 SAFUL CONSULTING, INC Systems, circuits and methods for an interconnect fabric with programmable circuit routes for configuring solar cell strings
11967653, Mar 15 2013 AMPT, LLC Phased solar power supply system
12057514, Mar 15 2013 AMPT, LLC Converter controlled solar power supply system for battery based loads
6686533, Jan 29 2002 Israel Aircraft Industries Ltd System and method for converting solar energy to electricity
7605498, Oct 15 2007 AMPT, LLC Systems for highly efficient solar power conversion
7719140, Oct 15 2007 AMPT, LLC Systems for boundary controlled solar power conversion
7843085, Oct 15 2007 AMPT, LLC Systems for highly efficient solar power
7919953, Oct 23 2007 AMPT, LLC Solar power capacitor alternative switch circuitry system for enhanced capacitor life
8004116, Oct 15 2007 AMPT, LLC Highly efficient solar power systems
8093756, Oct 15 2007 AMPT, LLC AC power systems for renewable electrical energy
8180505, Nov 07 2007 The Aerospace Corporation Spacecraft solar cell monitoring system
8242634, Oct 15 2007 AMPT, LLC High efficiency remotely controllable solar energy system
8304932, Oct 15 2007 AMPT, LLC Efficient solar energy power creation systems
8461811, Oct 23 2007 AMPT, LLC Power capacitor alternative switch circuitry system for enhanced capacitor life
8482153, Oct 15 2007 AMPT, LLC Systems for optimized solar power inversion
8669462, May 24 2010 Sunpower Corporation Concentrating solar energy collector
8686279, May 17 2010 Sunpower Corporation Concentrating solar energy collector
8872083, Dec 16 2009 Saful Consulting Systems, circuits, and methods for generating a solar cell string of an adaptive solar power system
9067695, Apr 18 2012 The Boeing Company Solar array transfer orbit power maximizer
9270225, Jan 14 2013 NEXTRACKER LLC Concentrating solar energy collector
9353973, May 05 2010 NEXTRACKER LLC Concentrating photovoltaic-thermal solar energy collector
9397497, Mar 15 2013 AMPT, LLC High efficiency interleaved solar power supply system
9401451, May 27 2014 MAXEON SOLAR PTE LTD Shingled solar cell module
9438037, Oct 15 2007 AMPT, LLC Systems for optimized solar power inversion
9442504, Apr 17 2009 AMPT, LLC; AND, LLC Methods and apparatus for adaptive operation of solar power systems
9466737, Oct 19 2009 AMPT, LLC Solar panel string converter topology
9673630, Oct 15 2007 AMPT, LLC Protected conversion solar power system
9780253, May 27 2014 MAXEON SOLAR PTE LTD Shingled solar cell module
9868357, Oct 09 2014 PAIRED POWER, INC Electric vehicle charging systems and methods
D875665, Oct 15 2014 Sunpower Corporation Solar panel
D896747, Oct 15 2014 MAXEON SOLAR PTE LTD Solar panel
D913210, Oct 15 2014 MAXEON SOLAR PTE LTD Solar panel
D916651, Oct 15 2014 MAXEON SOLAR PTE LTD Solar panel
D933584, Nov 08 2012 MAXEON SOLAR PTE LTD Solar panel
D933585, Oct 15 2014 MAXEON SOLAR PTE LTD Solar panel
D934158, Oct 15 2014 MAXEON SOLAR PTE LTD Solar panel
D977413, Oct 15 2014 MAXEON SOLAR PTE LTD Solar panel
D980158, Oct 15 2014 MAXEON SOLAR PTE LTD Solar panel
ER112,
ER135,
ER2402,
ER2689,
ER2746,
ER4990,
ER7140,
ER96,
ER9614,
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4513167, Apr 27 1982 The Australian National University Arrays of polarized energy-generating elements
5131955, Jan 14 1991 Lockheed Martin Corporation Depolyable retractable photovoltaic concentrator solar array assembly for space applications
5158250, Jul 31 1990 Aerospatiale Societe Nationale Industrielle Spin-stabilized artificial satellite with passive compensation of solar radiation pressure
5500052, May 19 1993 NEC Corporation Solar photovoltaic power generation device capable of adjusting voltage and electric power
5620529, Nov 03 1995 Hughes Electronics Corporation Low disturbance solar array
5637155, Nov 25 1994 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Solar cell array and electronic equipment having the same
5669987, Apr 13 1994 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Abnormality detection method, abnormality detection apparatus, and solar cell power generating system using the same
5720452, May 29 1996 Lockheed Martin Corporation Solar panel parallel mounting configuration
5779817, Jun 30 1995 Webasto-Schade GmbH Circuit arrangement of solar cells
5874786, Mar 20 1997 Space Systems/Loral, Inc. Quad spacecraft power bus systems
////////////////////////////////////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Aug 07 1997DALLY, ROBERT B AEC-ABLE ENGINEERING CO , INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0086800260 pdf
Aug 07 1997JONES, P ALANAEC-ABLE ENGINEERING CO , INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0086800260 pdf
Aug 11 1999AEC-ABLE ENGINEERING COMPANYFLEET CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS AGENTASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0102260142 pdf
Mar 24 2004AEC-ABLE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC CAPITALSOURCE FINANCE LLCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0151390697 pdf
Mar 24 2004Fleet Capital CorporationAEC- ABLE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0151390535 pdf
Mar 31 2004ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC BANK OF AMERICA, N A SUPPLEMENTAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT NO 10152710023 pdf
Mar 31 2004PRESSURE SYSTEMS, INC BANK OF AMERICA, N A SUPPLEMENTAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT NO 10152710023 pdf
Mar 31 2004PROGRAMMED COMPOSITES INC BANK OF AMERICA, N A SUPPLEMENTAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT NO 10152710023 pdf
Mar 31 2004AEC - ABLE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC BANK OF AMERICA, N A SUPPLEMENTAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT NO 10152710023 pdf
Jan 05 2006AEC-ABLE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC ATK SPACE SYSTEMS INC MERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0207040187 pdf
Mar 24 2006CAPITALSOURCE FINANCE LLCAEC-ABLE ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT EFFECTIVE DATE 09 22 04 0176810839 pdf
Mar 31 2008ATK SPACE SYSTEMS INC ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0207230559 pdf
Oct 07 2010EAGLE NEW BEDFORD, INC BANK OF AMERICA, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0253210291 pdf
Oct 07 2010EAGLE MAYAGUEZ, LLCBANK OF AMERICA, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0253210291 pdf
Oct 07 2010EAGLE INDUSTRIES UNLIMITED, INC BANK OF AMERICA, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0253210291 pdf
Oct 07 2010Federal Cartridge CompanyBANK OF AMERICA, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0253210291 pdf
Oct 07 2010ATK SPACE SYSTEMS INC BANK OF AMERICA, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0253210291 pdf
Oct 07 2010ATK LAUNCH SYSTEMS INC BANK OF AMERICA, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0253210291 pdf
Oct 07 2010ATK COMMERCIAL AMMUNITION HOLDINGS COMPANYBANK OF AMERICA, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0253210291 pdf
Oct 07 2010ATK COMMERCIAL AMMUNITION COMPANY INC BANK OF AMERICA, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0253210291 pdf
Oct 07 2010AMMUNITION ACCESSORIES INC BANK OF AMERICA, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0253210291 pdf
Oct 07 2010ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC BANK OF AMERICA, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0253210291 pdf
Nov 01 2013ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC BANK OF AMERICA, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0317310281 pdf
Nov 01 2013CALIBER COMPANYBANK OF AMERICA, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0317310281 pdf
Nov 01 2013EAGLE INDUSTRIES UNLIMITED, INC BANK OF AMERICA, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0317310281 pdf
Nov 01 2013Federal Cartridge CompanyBANK OF AMERICA, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0317310281 pdf
Nov 01 2013SAVAGE ARMS, INC BANK OF AMERICA, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0317310281 pdf
Nov 01 2013SAVAGE RANGE SYSTEMS, INC BANK OF AMERICA, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0317310281 pdf
Nov 01 2013SAVAGE SPORTS CORPORATIONBANK OF AMERICA, N A SECURITY AGREEMENT0317310281 pdf
Feb 09 2015ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC ORBITAL ATK, INC CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0357530373 pdf
Sep 29 2015BANK OF AMERICA, N A AMMUNITION ACCESSORIES, INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0368160624 pdf
Sep 29 2015BANK OF AMERICA, N A EAGLE INDUSTRIES UNLIMITED, INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0368160624 pdf
Sep 29 2015BANK OF AMERICA, N A ORBITAL ATK, INC F K A ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0368150330 pdf
Sep 29 2015BANK OF AMERICA, N A FEDERAL CARTRIDGE CO RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0368150330 pdf
Sep 29 2015BANK OF AMERICA, N A COMPOSITE OPTICS, INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0368150330 pdf
Sep 29 2015BANK OF AMERICA, N A ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0368150330 pdf
Sep 29 2015ORBITAL ATK, INC WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0367320170 pdf
Sep 29 2015Orbital Sciences CorporationWELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0367320170 pdf
Jun 06 2018WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTORBITAL ATK, INC TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS0464770874 pdf
Jun 06 2018ORBITAL ATK, INC Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, IncCHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0474000381 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Aug 27 2004M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity.
Sep 19 2006RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned.
Oct 17 2008M2552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Yr, Small Entity.
Mar 18 2009ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Oct 17 2012M2553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Yr, Small Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Apr 17 20044 years fee payment window open
Oct 17 20046 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 17 2005patent expiry (for year 4)
Apr 17 20072 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Apr 17 20088 years fee payment window open
Oct 17 20086 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 17 2009patent expiry (for year 8)
Apr 17 20112 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Apr 17 201212 years fee payment window open
Oct 17 20126 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 17 2013patent expiry (for year 12)
Apr 17 20152 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)