silencer with built-in catalyser which utilises a given total space optimally for simultaneous sound attenuation and catalytic treatment of gases, e.g. exhaust gases from internal combustion engine. The silencer with built-in catalyser comprises a casing (1) connected to an inlet pipe (2) and to an outlet pipe (3), a sound attenuation compartment (4), a downstream catalytic body (5), a flow-area widening diffuser element (6) extending from the inlet pipe and contained within the compartment, and a cross-plate (7) which is positioned between the diffuser element and the catalytic body and from which the flow is distributed evenly across the inlet to the catalytic body. At least two openings (8) are provided between the diffuser element and the catalytic body, at least one such opening (9) providing a communication to the sound attenuation compartment and at least two such openings (10) being pervaded by gas flows.

Patent
   6220021
Priority
May 19 1995
Filed
Jan 16 1998
Issued
Apr 24 2001
Expiry
May 19 2015
Assg.orig
Entity
Small
5
54
EXPIRED
1. A silencer with a built-in catalyst for simultaneous sound attenuation and catalytic treatment of gases comprising: a casing connected to an inlet pipe and to an outlet pipe, a sound attenuation compartment having a substantial part which is not pervaded by the flow of gas, a downstream catalytic body, a flow-area widening diffuser element which is adapted to cause a substantial part of the flow of gas to flow with a substantial radial component and which extends from the inlet pipe and is contained within the compartment, and a cross-plate which is positioned between the diffuser element and the catalytic body and from which the flow is distributed evenly across the inlet to the catalytic body, at least two apertures being provided between the diffuser element and the catalytic body, at least one of the apertures providing a communication to the sound attenuation compartment and at least two of the apertures being pervaded by gas flows, the flow pervaded apertures having entrances provided with a curvature.
2. A silencer according to claim 1 where the flow pervaded apertures have downstream ends which comprise a flow cross-section expanding part.
3. A silencer according to claim 2 wherein the flow pervaded apertures have downstream ends which comprise a flow cross-section expanding part.
4. A silencer according to claim 1 wherein the flow pervaded apertures have surfaces which are coated by catalytic layers.
5. A silencer according to claim 1 wherein there is sound absorptive material within the compartment, and the diffuser element is provided with apertures which are not pervaded by flows and which constitute an acoustic communication to the sound absorptive material within the compartment.
6. A silencer according to claim 1 wherein a mechanical contact is established between the cross-plate and the catalytic body.
7. A silencer according to claim 1 wherein a distance is provided between the cross-plate and the catalytic body.
8. A silencer according to claim 1, wherein the sound attenuation compartment is around the inlet pipe, the diffuser element radially widens in the region toward the cross-plate and thereby defines the sound attenuation compartment, and the at least one aperture providing communication to the sound attenuation compartment being toward the radially outward region of the diffuser element toward the cross-plate.

The present invention discloses a silencer with a built-in catalyst which utilises a given total space optimally for simultaneous silencing and conversion of noxious exhaust gases, typically exhaust gases from prime mover internal combustion engines.

The invention utilises diffuser technology in a novel way, in that a special design of a built-in diffuser is adopted, both for sound attenuation and for even distribution of exhaust gas flow to the inlet face of a catalyser body.

As a consequence of ever more stringent environmental regulations, demands for low exhaust noise levels and for low levels of particle and noxious gas emissions to the atmosphere are increasing all the time. In addition, it is required that the flow resistance provided by silencers, catalysts, etc. be as small as possible, in order that the back-pressure to the engine can be kept as low as possible. This poses a problem to the exhaust system designer, since the available under-vehicle space is normally restricted.

A first step towards space economy, which has been adopted already, is to combine silencers and catalysts by inserting a catalysts inside the casing of a silencer. Even a simple catalysts containing canister causes some noise attenuation, by virtue of its acoustic volume or by throttling of the exhaust flow. In the case of a catalytic body with uninterrupted, straight channels of low pressure drop, however, the attenuation effect of the catalysts as such is only marginal, which can be shown by removing the catalytic body and by measuring how this influences the exhaust noise level outside the exhaust pipe system. Wall-flow catalysts, in which gases are forced to follow tortuous pathways inside the catalyst body, are more effective in suppressing noise, but such devices also cause rather high pressure drops.

In diesel engine exhaust systems accumulation of particulate matter is sometimes a problem. In catalysts particulate matter which is not converted tends to hamper the conversion process and to cause increased pressure drop. This problem, which at present receives much attention, primarily refers to the design of the catalyst as such, but should also be addressed when developing concepts for combined silencer catalysts.

Various sorts of diffusers have been utilised as flow distribution arrangements in front of catalysts and as flow elements in silencers.

In the first case these arrangements are answers to the following problem: Supposing that a catalysts is positioned close to an inlet pipe of substantially smaller diameter, how can an even flow distribution across the diameter of the catalysts be achieved? The demand for a close positioning results from an overall demand for compactness.

Many types of diffusers have been suggested as solutions to this flow distribution problem. Examples of this are: German Offenlegungsschrift no. 24 28 966, which describes a pure flow line diffuser and German Offenlegungsschrift no. 24 29 002, which describes arrangements with a plurality of flow dividing cones. The latter type of solution resembles well-known arrangements incorporating guide vanes in front of steam boiler exhaust catalysts, as well as `splitter` type diffusers commonly used in ventilating ductwork. German Offenlegungsschrift no. 24 28 964 and Norwegian utlegningsskrift no. 169581 both disclose more original diffuser catalyser arrangements.

German Offenlegungsschrift no. 2 307 215 describes a diffuser-type arrangement in which a perforated, conical member is inserted into a conical end cap at the inlet to a catalyst. This arrangement divides the rather small cavity in front of the catalyst into a flow distributing first cavity with radial diffuser properties and a second, flow mixing cavity immediately in front of the catalyser.

However, none of these solutions take acoustic aspects into consideration. To an extent this is inherent in the above formulation of the catalyst flow distribution problem, according to which the space in front of the catalytic body should be minimised, thereby significantly reducing the acoustic chamber effect. Of course, the gas volume contained within the catalytic body as such may provide some acoustic chamber effect. But from a sound attenuation point of view it is less expedient to arrange the inlet pipe / chamber flow area expansion at the upstream end of the casing. The reason is that this type of geometry tends to excite the fundamental acoustic chamber resonance maximally. This mode corresponds to a wavelength twice the acoustic chamber length, with a pressure node in the middle and maximum pressure variations at each end of the chamber.

Danish patent no. 128427 discloses a type of silencer in which a radial diffuser is utilised for achieving a low pressure drop and for positioning the outflow from the inlet pipe exactly in the middle along the length axis of a chamber, which suppresses the fundamental acoustic mode of the chamber. Danish patent no. 169823 discloses how special type diffusers with narrow, axial outflows into acoustic compartments can be adopted for suppressing lateral, resonant gas vibrations, which is particularly relevant in the case of silencers with a large casing diameter compared to pipe diameters.

This last-mentioned patent in a sub-claim also describes the possibility of utilising a radial flow property of axial outflow diffusers to obtain a flow distribution effect in front of a catalyst inserted into the silencer. However, due to the narrow lateral extension of the diffuser outflow, this tends to require that the catalytic body be of a ring-type cross section. In the case of a large diameter casing this could for instance be provided for by dividing the catalytic body into several parallel elements. But in the case of long and not too wide casings, as are generally required for under-vehicle installations, much speaks in favour of retaining a simple cylinder form of the catalytic body. In such a case the rather narrow axial outflow at a considerable distance from the centerline is less expedient in providing flow to the center of the inlet face of the catalytic body.

In the present invention the silencing and flow distributing objectives are met simultaneously by utilising a novel, special type of diffuser provided with, as a minimun 2, but in general further, apertures, as can be seen from FIG. 1 which shows a first embodiment of the invention.

Here, an acoustic compartment 4 and a catalytic body 5 are both fitted into a casing 1, which is connected to an inlet pipe 2 and to an outlet pipe 3. An elastic layer 5a holds the catalyst and protects it from undue mechanical forces. The diffuser element 6 and the juxtaposed cross-plate flange 7, provided with apertures 8, 10, together constitute a pressure recovering and flow distributing cross-plate diffuser. Due to the rather big aperture 8, 9, 10 it is ensured that a significant proportion of the acoustic energy present in the gas is transmitted into the compartment 4, in which sound-absorbing material 14 is inserted inside a perforated pipe 15.

In FIG. 1, as well as in the following figures, apertures are numbered according to a system. Thus, the number 8 is used for apertures in general, irrespective of type, while 9 is used for such apertures as communicate with the compartment 4, and 10 is used for apertures which are pervaded by a flow. Thus, since the comparatively big aperture in FIG. 1 both communicates with the compartment 4 and is pervaded by a flow, both characterising numbers 9 and 10 have been attached to this aperture.

FIG. 2 shows an enlarged detail of the embodiment of FIG. 1, as an example of how apertures 8, 10 of the cross-plate 7 can be designed. Here, at the inlets to apertures, curvatures 11 have been provided for. The width of the cross-plate is shown to be of some size, so that the length of the apertures can be made significant. This in turn makes it possible to design the downstream ends of the apertures with gradually increasing cross-sectional areas. Hereby the apertures become small venturi-like diffusers.

The cross-plate diffuser constitutes an original type of diffuser arrangement, which is very appropriate for the present purpose, and which can be designated as a multiple-double diffuser. In an optimised design, both the flow distribution and the pressure recovery functions are provided for with a high degree of efficiency. This optimisation will include design of the aperture geometries. For instance, the widths of the apertures can be made a function of their distance from the center axis of the casing, in order that exit velocities are equal from individual apertures positioned at various radii.

In embodiments where the apertures are positioned close to each other, as is the case in FIG. 2, it is possible to design the cross-plate to be placed immediately adjacent to the inlet face of the catalytic body in such a way that gas flows enter virtually all parallel channels of the catalyst. For instance, this can be done by forming the apertures as peripheral slots. Thus, designing the apertures in this way opens up for the possibility of positioning the cross-plate in a direct mechanical contact with the catalyst.

In apparatuses with small, flow pervaded apertures 8, 10 the risk of blocking caused by accumulation of particulate matter may call for attention. Designing the apertures to a streamlike flow form, avoiding local recirculation zones, tends to lessen the problem. The risk of this unwelcome phenomenon can be further minimised by providing catalytic layers onto the inner surfaces 13 of the apertures.

The rather thick cross-plate flange 7 shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 can be manufactured from cast iron. As an alternative, the cross-plate can be manufactured as part of the catalyst element. Such a radical step of integration can be made in case the catalyst is manufactured from a metallic foil substrate, which easily lends itself to various forms. A further possibility, which provides a simple approximation to the venturi diffuser form, is to manufacture the cross-plate from a composition of several perforated plates with different sizes of the perforations of each plate.

FIG. 3 shows a further embodiment of the invention, in which the number of apertures is much smaller than according to FIGS. 1 and 2. This calls for the necessity of a certain distance 16 to the catalyser element, as. The fewer, but bigger apertures of this figure can be seen as a simple method of preventing accumulated particulate matter from disturbing flows through apertures. In this embodiment the simplest method of manufacturing the cross-plate is to press it from metal sheet. The various parts are held together by means of ribs 17, which are axially aligned with the flow direction.

The flow dynamic design of diffuser forms according to FIG. 3 can be made from the theory of axisymmetrical potential flows as a starting point. Mathematical analysis reveals that classes of forms with pervaded cross-plates can be derived as rather simple solutions to the flow field equation. The final choice of diffuser forms will have to take various further aspects into consideration, including the effect of fluid flow friction, as well as manufacturing aspects.

The acoustic optimisation of the apparatus affects a number of design parameters, among them the distance between the cross-plate diffuser and the catalyst body. In case the effective flow cross-sectional area of the catalyst is rather big, the catalyst may only to a minor degree cause an acoustical division of the casing into sub-chambers. In such cases the flow exit inside the casing can be positioned in the middle along the axial direction, with the effect of suppressing the fundamental acoustical chamber mode, which (as previously mentioned) has a pressure node in the middle.

In other apparatuses the effective flow area of the catalyst may be more restricted, causing an effective acoustical division into sub-chambers. In such cases, in terms of suppression of chamber resonances, it is preferable to instead position the cross-plate halfway between the inlet end cap of the casing and the inlet face to the catalyst.

Finally, FIGS. 4 and 5 show an embodiment of the invention, in which some of the apertures 8 are perforations 9, which are not pervaded by flows, and which constitute an acoustical communication to the sound absorption material 14 contained within the compartment 4.

In order that the compartment 4 contributes significantly to the sound attenuation it is imperative that the effective opening area of this compartment to the rest of the apparatus is not too small.

Frederiksen, Lars, Frederiksen, Svend

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10180287, Jun 21 2013 Modine Manufacturing Company Exhaust gas cooler
11181027, Apr 02 2018 CUMMINS EMISSION SOLUTIONS INC Aftertreatment system including noise reducing components
11486289, Jul 03 2018 CUMMINS EMISSION SOLUTIONS INC Body mixing decomposition reactor
11891937, Jul 03 2018 Cummins Emission Solutions Inc. Body mixing decomposition reactor
7247185, Feb 11 2003 Volvo Car Corporation Device for treatment of a gas flow
Patent Priority Assignee Title
2677231,
3852042,
3897853,
3899303,
3984207, Sep 23 1972 Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft Mounting support for a catalyst body
3989471, Apr 14 1975 Tenneco Inc. Radial flow catalytic converter having thermal expansion compensating means
4004887, Mar 16 1973 AVL Medical Instruments AG Catalytic converter having a resilient thermal-variation compensating monolith-mounting arrangement
4032310, May 15 1974 Muffler and exhaust gas purifier for internal combustion engines
4050903, Oct 29 1976 ASEC Manufacturing Combination muffler and catalytic converter
4094645, Jan 24 1977 ASEC Manufacturing Combination muffler and catalytic converter having low backpressure
4109753, Nov 19 1976 Midas-International Corporation Muffler assembly
4209493, Jul 11 1977 Nelson Industries, Inc. Combination catalytic converter and muffler for an exhaust system
4601168, Dec 12 1984 HARRIS, HAROLD L Noise and emission control apparatus
4848513, Jan 11 1988 Ced's, Inc. Noise abatement muffler
5016438, Sep 25 1989 HARRIS, HAROLD L Emission control apparatus
5043147, Dec 15 1989 Combined muffler and catalytic converter exhaust unit
5065576, Feb 17 1989 Kabushiki Kaisha Toyoda Jidoshokki Seisakusho Exhaust gas purifying device for a diesel engine
5150573, Oct 02 1987 EMITEC Gesellschaft fuer Emissionstechnologie mbH Catalyst arrangement with flow guide body
5184464, Apr 22 1991 HARRIS, HAROLD L Noise and emmission control apparatus
5220789, Mar 05 1991 REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF MICHIGAN Integral unitary manifold-muffler-catalyst device
5248859, Mar 25 1991 BORLA PERFORMANCE INDUSTRIES, INC Collector/muffler/catalytic converter exhaust systems for evacuating internal combustion engine cylinders
5351483, Mar 05 1991 FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC A MICHIGAN CORPORATION Integral unitary manifold-muffler-catalyst device
5355973, Jun 02 1992 Donaldson Company, Inc. Muffler with catalytic converter arrangement; and method
5378435, Sep 04 1991 Gavoni B. G. M. Silenziatori Di Albino Gavoni & C. S.a.s. Silencer combined with catalytic converter for internal combustion engines and modular diaphragm elements for said silencer
5396764, Feb 14 1994 FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC A MICHIGAN CORPORATION Spark ignition engine exhaust system
5396767, Apr 06 1992 Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha Engine exhaust gas cleaning system
5398407, Jul 08 1991 Scambia Industrial Developments Aktiengesellschaft Method for producing a device for muffling sound or catalytic treatment of exhaust
5403557, Apr 19 1994 HARRIS, HAROLD L Emission control apparatus for diesel engine
5408827, Sep 28 1993 BRP US INC Marine propulsion device with improved catalyst support arrangement
5408828, Dec 10 1993 General Motors Corporation Integral cast diffuser for a catalytic converter
5426269, Jun 02 1992 Donaldson Company, Inc. Muffler with catalytic converter arrangement; and method
5484575, May 02 1991 Scambia Industrial Developments Aktiengesellschaft Catalytic converter for the catalytic treatment of exhaust gas
5737918, Jan 17 1994 Joint Stock Commercial Bank "Petrovsky" Apparatus for cleaning exhaust gases of solid particles, design of a unit for neutralizing harmful gaseous emissions and a method for the manufacture of this unit
5758497, May 19 1995 SILENTOR HOLDING A S Silencer
5828013, Jun 02 1992 Donaldson Company, Inc. Muffler with catalytic converter arrangement; and method
5829132, Aug 07 1996 ET US Holdings LLC Methods of assembling an exhaust processor
5921079, Nov 03 1997 HARRIS, HAROLD L Emission control apparatus
DE2307215,
DE2428964,
DE2429002,
DE3039742,
DE4130113,
DK128427,
DK169823,
EP158625,
EP410924,
EP556846,
EP683849,
JP4072414,
JP5237397,
NO169581,
WO9324744,
WO9410430,
WO9418438,
/////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Nov 28 1997FREDERIKSEN, SVENSILENTOR A SASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0090530672 pdf
Nov 28 1997FREDERIKSEN, LARSSILENTOR A SASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0090530672 pdf
Jan 16 1998Silentor Notox A/S(assignment on the face of the patent)
Jan 12 1999SILENTOR A SSILENTOR NOTOX A SCHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0112540755 pdf
Dec 19 2000SILENTOR NOTOX A SSILENTOR HOLDING A SCHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0122110924 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Sep 28 2004M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity.
Nov 03 2008REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Apr 24 2009EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Apr 24 20044 years fee payment window open
Oct 24 20046 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 24 2005patent expiry (for year 4)
Apr 24 20072 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Apr 24 20088 years fee payment window open
Oct 24 20086 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 24 2009patent expiry (for year 8)
Apr 24 20112 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Apr 24 201212 years fee payment window open
Oct 24 20126 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 24 2013patent expiry (for year 12)
Apr 24 20152 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)