Transmission characteristics of an optical device 200, fabricated from multiple layers 16, 27, 28 of silica-based glass on a silicon substrate 26, are modified by localized thermal treatment. The beam 501 of a carbon-dioxide (CO2) laser 510 is used to selectively soften the core and/or cladding material of a waveguide structure during or after the fabrication process. In one application, softening relieves the strain developed between the waveguide structure and the silicon substrate and substantially reduces or eliminates birefringence. In a second application, the CO2 laser is operated at another power level in order to modify the index of refraction. Changes in the index of refraction change the speed of light through a waveguide thereby changing the phase shift associated with the waveguide. In a third application, the CO2 laser is operated at yet another power level to increase the transmission loss of the waveguide. In all of the embodiments, heat treatment is substantially faster and/or less expensive than known techniques for modifying the transmission characteristics of an optical device.
|
1. A method for reducing an inherent polarization shift caused by birefringence between the TE and TM modes of an optical signal propagating in an optical grating that includes a plurality of waveguides of unequal lengths, said waveguides comprising a core material surrounded by a cladding material, the method comprising the step of:
scanning predetermined lengths of the waveguides of the grating with a laser to induce localized softening of at least the cladding material in order to induce a polarization shift between the t E and TM modes that tends to compensate the inherent polarization shift.
4. An optical device, which is fabricated by a method that includes the steps:
depositing a plurality of layers of silica-based glass on a silicon substrate, wherein one or more waveguides are formed as light-transmitting paths of core material surrounded by cladding material; directing the beam of a laser to a selected region of the optical device that intersects a portion of said waveguides, the beam having a power density that is at least sufficient to cause localized softening of the silica-based glass forming the waveguides, wherein a predetermined light-transmitting characteristic of the waveguides is modified.
2. The method of
selecting a scanning pattern that induces localized softening of its cladding material such that length of each waveguide whose cladding material is softened varies from waveguide to waveguide and is proportional to the length of the waveguide.
5. The method of
7. The method of
|
This invention relates to optical devices and, more particularly, to a technique for modifying one or more transmission characteristics of such devices.
Optical devices such as waveguides, gratings and switches, for example, are typically fabricated in layers of silica-based glass deposited onto a silicon substrate. The finished devices are expensive because an extremely high-precision fabrication process is involved. Moreover, even when the fabrication process is perfect, certain problems such as strain birefingence arise because the various layers have different thermal expansion coefficients, which cause large strains once the device returns to ambient temperature after undergoing annealing. It is therefore desirable to further process a fabricated optical device in order to modify one or more of its transmission characteristics (e.g., birefringence, phase shift and loss) to thereby improve yield and provide customization. is known to reduce birefingence by applying various forms of electromagnetic radiation such as ultraviolet (UV), x-ray, and even ionized particles such as proton beams. For example, Hibino et al., Electronics Letters, Vol. 29, No. 7 pp. 621-623 (1993) indicate that birefringence can be reduced by irradiating the waveguide structures at a wavelength which is absorbed by photosensitive defects in the core material. In particular, Hibino demonstrated that birefringence can be reduced in germanium-doped planar silica waveguides by irradiation with ultraviolet light at a wavelength of 248 nanometers (nm). This wavelength corresponds to germanium-related color center defects that are known to be present in the doped silica core material. In Hibino, the photosensitivity of the germanium core is enhanced by consolidating the core material in a reducing atmosphere. This technique is well known to facilitate the generation of germanium defects responsible for optical absorption at 248 nm. Since the cladding composition is presumably a standard phosphorous and boron-doped silica layer, the cladding is essentially transparent to light at 248 nm, with an optical absorption coefficient on the order of 0.1 cm-1. By comparison, the optical absorption coefficient of the germanium-doped core layer is on the order of 100 cm-1 at this wavelength. While the prior art has reduced birefringence in waveguide structures using ultraviolet (UV) radiation, these techniques have required that a specific mask be fabricated for each device and are unsatisfactory when applied to an integrated optical grating where 10-200 waveguides are involved, each separated by as little as 20 microns. In this case the waveguides cannot be selectively irradiated by masking individual ones of the waveguides. Moreover, the time required for birefringence modification is in the order of hours, which is too long for commercial application.
It is also known to cause refractive index changes by laser irradiation. Such changes may be used to modify the propagation delay (i.e., phase shift) of an optical waveguide in order to correct phase error. For example, Hibino et al., IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Vol. 3, No. 7 pp. 640-642 (1991) apply an Ar+ laser, operating at 480 nm, for about one hour to modify the phase characteristics of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer via two-photon absorption. In a manufacturing environment, however, it is not practical to expend this much time per device. The photosensitivity of silica materials is sometimes employed to alter the refractive index without affecting the birefringence. For example, Kitagawa et al., Electronics Letters, 1994, Vol. 30, No. 16 pp. 1311-1312, form optical gratings by photo-inducing (via a mask) spatially non-uniform refractive index changes at a wavelength of 193 nm. The waveguides are first loaded with molecular hydrogen to increase their photosensitivity. Other techniques for modifying the phase shift of an optical waveguide involve: (i) the use of thin-film heaters deposited on top of the waveguides to thermo-optically change the propagation constant of the waveguide (H. Yamada, Electronics Letters, Vol. 31, No. 5, 1995, pp. 360-361); and (ii) the use of a thin amorphous silicon film deposited on top of the waveguides to change the propagation constant of the waveguide (H. Yamada, Electronics Letters, Vol. 32, No. 17, 1996, pp. 1580-1582).
Additionally, it is desirable to equalize the transmission loss associated with the input and/or output ports of a optical branching device during fabrication or by post-fabrication processing rather than by the addition of discrete attenuator elements. For example, a dense wavelength-division multiplexer (DWDM) is shown in application Ser. No. 08/759,281 using thermo-optic Mach-Zehnder interferometers as tunable attenuators. Equalization is difficult to achieve in a manufacturing environment, but it is critical to the proper operation of DWDMs and similar optical devices.
Accordingly, what is desired is a method for modifying one or more transmission characteristics of an optical device during fabrication or by post-fabrication processing rather than the addition of additional elements. Moreover it is desirable that overall processing be completed in less time than existing techniques permit.
The inventors of the present invention have discovered that by applying localized thermal treatment, of suitable intensity, that various transmission characteristics of an optical device can be modified. The optical device is fabricated from multiple layers of silica-based glass deposited onto a silicon substrate.
In an illustrative embodiment of the present invention, a carbon-dioxide (CO2) laser is used to selectively soften the cladding material of a waveguide structure. Such softening relieves the strain developed between the waveguide structure and the silicon substrate and substantially reduces or eliminates birefringence.
In another illustrative embodiment of the invention, the C2 laser is operated at a power level, which is suitable for changing the index of refraction the waveguide. Such modification changes the speed of light through the waveguide and, consequently, the phase shift associated with a given length of the waveguide is changed.
In yet another illustrative embodiment of the invention, the CO2 laser is operated at a power level, which is suitable for increasing the transmission loss of the waveguide. This is a particularly useful application of the invention because it allows the manufacturer to equalize the power levels of the various outputs of an optical demultiplexer, for example. Such equalization is frequently handled by attaching discrete optical attenuators to each output port--a technique that is costly, cumbersome, and prone to error.
In all of the embodiments, one or more transmission characteristics of an optical device may be modified by localized thermal treatment during, or subsequent to, fabrication of the device. Such treatment is substantially faster and/or less expensive than known techniques for achieving similar results, and are particularly advantageous for correcting imperfections associated with the manufacturing process.
Optical multiplexers and demultiplexers are key elements in modern optical networks, and are typically fabricated by interconnecting a pair of star couplers with a grating that comprises a number of unequal-length waveguides (also known as an arrayed waveguide grating or AWG). The lengths of these waveguides are purposely made unequal so that each individual waveguide provides just the right amount of phase shift to enable accurate multiplexing (in one direction of transmission) and/or demultiplexing (in the other direction). However, certain transmission characteristics (e.g., phase shift) of the individual waveguides may need to be modified, either during or after fabrication, so that the overall optical device performs satisfactorily. The principles of the present invention are best disclosed by first discussing the fabrication of such multiplexers and demultiplexers.
Referring now to
The most advanced and technically developed planar waveguides are doped-silica waveguides fabricated with SiOB technology. A doped-silica waveguide is usually preferred because it has a number of attractive properties including low cost, low insertion loss, low birefringence, stability, and compatibility for coupling to fiber. Further, the processing steps are compatible with those in silicon integrated circuit (IC) technology, which are geared for mass production and are readily known.
Generally, doped-silica waveguides 15, 16 are formed by initially depositing a base or lower cladding layer 27 of low index silica on a silicon or silica substrate 26. A layer of doped silica with a high refractive index, i.e., the core layer 16, is then deposited on top of the lower cladding layer. The core layer is subsequently patterned or sculpted into structures required by the optical circuits using photo-lithographic techniques similar to those used in integrated circuit fabrication. Lastly, a top cladding layer 28 is deposited to cover the patterned waveguide core. This technology is generally described by Y. P. Li and C. H. Henry in Silicon Optical Bench Waveguide Technology at Chapter 8 of the text Optical Fiber Telecommunications IIIB. edited by Ivan P. Karninow and Thomas L. Koch, Copyright 1997 by Lucent Technologies, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Critical to the performance of any planar optical waveguide are the waveguide dimensions, i.e., the height and width of the waveguide core, and the refractive index difference between the core and the cladding, denoted Δ. The height or thickness of the core is determined by the amount of core material deposited on a carrier substrate; and the width of the core is determined by the photo-lithographic mask and undercut in chemical etching. The Δ of the waveguide is mostly determined by the material system and the fabrication process. In practice, different waveguide structures and systems are used for different types of functions and tradeoffs are made in the core dimensions and Δ to optimize different aspects of optical performance.
Birefringence
Optical devices are often required to perform in a manner that is insensitive to the polarization state of the input optical signal. Strain induced birefringence in silica waveguide devices can seriously degrade performance in this respect. For example, the difference between the two principle refractive indices in silica waveguides which is attributable to strain is typically measured to be about 3×10-4. An optical signal propagating in a device such as a multiplexer/demultiplexer which incorporates silica waveguides experiences a wavelength dependence on polarization of about 0.3 nm, which is unacceptably large for many applications. In telecommunications wavelength-division multiplexed systems for example, a maximum polarization wavelength dependence of about 0.05 nm is required.
Heretofore, birefringence has been reduced by irradiating the waveguide structure at wavelengths that are absorbed by photosensitive defects in the core material as discussed in the Background of the Invention.
Of particular interest is the reduction of birefringence in an optical grating, defined as a plurality of waveguides having unequal lengths that provide a predetermined path length difference when traversed by optical signals propagating therein. In some cases adjacent waveguides in the grating all differ in length from one another by a constant predetermined amount. The path length difference imparts a shift in the phase of the optical signals relative to one another. Optical gratings are well known in the art and shown, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,002,350 and 5,136,671.
Compressive strains in the silica material of which the integrated optical grating is composed give rise to birefringence. Birefringence in turn gives rise to different propagation constants for the TE and TM modes of an optical wave propagating in the waveguides of the optical grating. The different propagation constants for the TE and TM modes yield a difference in the phase shift experienced by the two modes as they propagate. The relative phase shift between the two modes splits the peaks appearing in the transmission spectrum of the grating into two distinct peaks. The wavelength separation between these peaks will be referred to as the inherent polarization shift observed in the transmission spectrum.
The present invention modifies birefringence in silica-based optical waveguides by localized thermal treatment of the waveguide structure in such a manner that the strain developed between the waveguide structure and the silicon substrate is reduced or eliminated. In particular, the method utilizes a localized source of heat such as, for example, the beam of a carbon dioxide (CO2) laser, to selectively soften the cladding material of the waveguide structure and release the strain developed between the waveguide structure and the silicon substrate during the annealing step of the fabrication process. A difference in the refractoriness of the core and the cladding enables localized thermal treatment of the cladding to be completed without affecting the integrity of the core of the waveguide structure. By softening a circumscribed area of the cladding of the waveguide structure, strain is selectively relieved and, consequently, birefringence is modified according to the desires of the designer.
To reduce or even eliminate the inherent polarization shift, the phase shift experienced by the TE and TM modes must be adjusted to compensate for the effects of birefringence. As discussed above, the requisite compensation can be achieved by thermally treating the waveguides to induce a compensating polarization shift that cancels the inherent polarization shift. The compensating differential phase shift introduced by localized thermal treatment is proportional to the length of waveguide treated. In a grating of unequal-length waveguides, for example, it is understood that length of waveguide that receives heat treatment is proportional to the overall length of the waveguide.
Phase Error
Optical waveguide filters are typically based on the principle of interference. An optical signal is split into two or more beams using a directional coupler or a star coupler (see FIG. 1), the phase of each beam is then altered by varying the optical path lengths, and the beams are finally recombined to obtain the required effect. At optical wavelengths, the optical path length needs to be accurately controlled to achieve low crosstalk, high isolation, and accuracy of the center wavelength of the passband. The optical path length depends of the physical path length and the propagation constant of the optical mode propagating in the waveguide. The physical path length is accurately controlled by the design of the make that is used to fabricate the device. The propagation constant of the mode in the waveguide depends on the geometrical and structural properties of the waveguide, and it is very sensitive to fabrication variations. For example, offsets from the desired value of the refractive index of the core or the cladding layer, and/or offsets of the dimensions of the optical waveguide, as well as variations, i.e., non-uniformity of the above parameters across the device, can substantially alter the phase of the propagating optical mode and lower the performance of the device. Therefore, it is desirable to have some means of compensating for the phase errors produced by the fabrication process to increase the device yield in manufacturing and, ultimately, to improve the performance achievable with the available technology.
Transmission Loss
Optical transmission networks frequently include cascaded multiplexers and demultiplexers as well as optical amplifiers, and unequal power levels in the different channels results in poor signal-to-noise ratio in the low power channels. This is of particular concern because the normal operation of an AWG-type wavelength-division multiplexer, such as shown in
Ideally, the optical power from any input splits evenly into all the outputs without power loss, so that each output receives an equal portion of the input power. One star coupler includes a dielectric slab 20 which comprises a free-space region having two curved, preferably circular, boundaries. Power transfer through this star coupler is accomplished through radiation in the dielectric slab 20 from input waveguide 21 to the output waveguides that make up grating 450. This grating 450 is connected to another star coupler that includes dielectric slab 40. The effect of the grating and the positioning of input and output waveguides on the dielectric slab 40 causes predetermined wavelengths (colors) to be directed to specific output waveguides 41. However, the power levels of the output colors are not generally equal to each other, and correction is required. This is frequently handled by the use of attenuators 410-410 at various output ports that decrease the power level by different amounts to a predetermined level. It is known to mount such attenuators 410 on the same substrate as the demultiplexer 400; however, such attenuators require additional space and add complexity to the design (see e.g., application Ser. No. 08/759,281 which uses thermo-optic Mach-Zehnder interferometers as tunable attenuators).
The substrate 26 of the optical device 200 is mounted on a holder 561 whose position is controlled by position controller 560. Indeed, position controller 560 is responsive to control signals over path 542 from processor 540, which ultimately controls relative movement between the heat source 510 and the optical device 200. Although not shown in
Processor 540 includes stored program information that dynamically controls the intensity of laser source 510 via control signals over path 541 and the instantaneous position of the optical device 200. Examples of different scanning patterns are shown in
Reference is briefly made to
When the apparatus of
As indicated by the example above, the present invention selects an appropriate power density of the localized heating source at which to expose the waveguides. The main advantage of the technique of the present invention with respect to the UV irradiation technique is a much shorter duration of the modification process. Typically, with the UV irradiation method the time required for a convenient birefringence modification is in the order of hours (typically >8 hours) per device, while the process time for the method of the present invention is typically in the order of minutes (<10) per device. Another advantage is that the geometry of the localized thermal treatment can be changed via software by using a programmable positioner for the device, or for the source of heat, or for both, while a specific mask has to be fabricated for each device if the UV irradiation method is used.
When the apparatus of
Finally, when the apparatus of
Although various particular embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, modifications are possible within the scope of the invention. These modifications include, but are not limited to: the use of a heat source other than a CO2 laser; the modification of transmission characteristics other than birefringence, refractive index or transmission loss; and the application of heat-treatment to optical devices other than the one disclosed herein.
Barbarossa, Giovanni, Narayanan, Chellappan
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
6529660, | Aug 10 2000 | Yamaha Corporation | Optical multiplexer/demultiplexer and its manufacture method |
6539135, | Nov 12 1998 | The University of Sydney | Process for control of birefringence in waveguides |
6563986, | Mar 28 2000 | FURUKAWA ELECTRIC CO , LTD , THE | Arrayed waveguide grating |
6608948, | Dec 18 2000 | Lumentum Operations LLC | Periodic arrayed waveguide grating multiplexer/demultiplexer |
6621048, | Sep 13 2000 | Carl Zeiss SMT AG | Method for heating a workpiece |
6684013, | May 26 2000 | NEC Corporation | Optical waveguide device to be optically poled, method of manufacturing optical waveguide device to be optically poled, and method of optically poling optical waveguide device |
6788850, | Apr 30 2001 | II-VI Incorporated; MARLOW INDUSTRIES, INC ; EPIWORKS, INC ; LIGHTSMYTH TECHNOLOGIES, INC ; KAILIGHT PHOTONICS, INC ; COADNA PHOTONICS, INC ; Optium Corporation; Finisar Corporation; II-VI OPTICAL SYSTEMS, INC ; M CUBED TECHNOLOGIES, INC ; II-VI PHOTONICS US , INC ; II-VI DELAWARE, INC; II-VI OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICES, INC ; PHOTOP TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Configuration for multiplexing and/or demultiplexing the signals of at least two optical wavelength channels |
6823110, | Jun 14 2000 | Corning Research & Development Corporation | Method to stabilize and adjust the optical path length of waveguide devices |
6844212, | Aug 24 2001 | BROADCOM INTERNATIONAL PTE LTD | Grating dispersion compensator and method of manufacture |
6941042, | May 18 2001 | Intel Corporation | High-efficiency arrayed-waveguide grating router by wavefront formation |
6970635, | Jun 21 2001 | Johns Hopkins University, The | Method of and apparatus for setting apparent length of optical fiber |
6987908, | Aug 24 2001 | BROADCOM INTERNATIONAL PTE LTD | Grating dispersion compensator and method of manufacture |
7006730, | Mar 15 2002 | RPX Corporation | Multichannel integrated tunable thermo-optic lens and dispersion compensator |
7110631, | Mar 08 2002 | Infinera Corporation | Method of adjusting a center wavelength of modulated sources wavelength grid with the passband of an optical combiner |
7139451, | Nov 16 2000 | NEC Corporation | Arrayed waveguide grading with optical input and output characteristics settable to desired values |
7194162, | Feb 22 2002 | NeoPhotonics Corporation | Filter response optimization for an arrayed waveguide grating device by adjusting grating optical path length at nanometer scale |
7272280, | Dec 16 2004 | Honeywell International Inc.; Honeywell International Inc | Optical coupler for measuring wavelength |
7681366, | Mar 15 2007 | PERMASTEELISA NORTH AMERICA CORP | Curtain wall anchor system |
7853108, | Dec 29 2006 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Fabrication-tolerant waveguides and resonators |
7903909, | Oct 22 2007 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Low-loss bloch wave guiding in open structures and highly compact efficient waveguide-crossing arrays |
7920770, | May 01 2008 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Reduction of substrate optical leakage in integrated photonic circuits through localized substrate removal |
8032027, | Jul 25 2005 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Wide free-spectral-range, widely tunable and hitless-switchable optical channel add-drop filters |
8068706, | Dec 29 2006 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Fabrication-tolerant waveguides and resonators |
8098968, | Sep 04 2007 | International Business Machines Corporation | Silicide thermal heaters for silicon-on-insulator nanophotonic devices |
8105758, | Jul 11 2006 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Microphotonic maskless lithography |
8111994, | Aug 16 2006 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Balanced bypass circulators and folded universally-balanced interferometers |
8116603, | Oct 22 2007 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Low-loss Bloch wave guiding in open structures and highly compact efficient waveguide-crossing arrays |
8340478, | Dec 03 2008 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Resonant optical modulators |
8483521, | May 29 2009 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Cavity dynamics compensation in resonant optical modulators |
8494319, | Feb 26 2009 | ZHU HAI BEN JIA TECHNOLOGY CO , LTD | Arrayed waveguide grating (AWG) with different radii in the input and output slab regions |
8547008, | Jan 12 2006 | Vitro Flat Glass LLC | Material having laser induced light redirecting features |
8629610, | Jan 12 2006 | Vitro Flat Glass LLC | Display panel |
8655114, | Mar 26 2007 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Hitless tuning and switching of optical resonator amplitude and phase responses |
9016013, | Nov 20 2012 | Specified Technologies Inc. | Curtain wall anchor fire protection apparatus |
9086584, | Aug 24 2006 | Cornell University | Dynamic wavelength converter |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4090776, | Oct 13 1976 | Honeywell Inc. | Fabrication of optical waveguides |
4378490, | Nov 21 1979 | Thomson-CSF | Optical attenuator providing controlled attenuation |
4978188, | Jun 29 1987 | Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation | Integrated optical device and method for manufacturing thereof |
5002350, | Feb 26 1990 | AT&T Bell Laboratories | Optical multiplexer/demultiplexer |
5136671, | Aug 21 1991 | AT&T Bell Laboratories; AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NY | Optical switch, multiplexer, and demultiplexer |
5500031, | May 05 1992 | Fitel USA Corporation | Method for increasing the index of refraction of a glassy material |
5506925, | Feb 28 1995 | AT&T IPM Corp | Radiolytic modification of birefringence in silica planar waveguide structures |
5625723, | Feb 28 1995 | AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP SINGAPORE PTE LTD | Method for reducing birefringence in optical gratings |
5694512, | Jul 09 1996 | FCI CONNECTORS CANADA, INC | Compact tunable wavelength independent all-fiber optical attenuator and method of making same |
5745271, | Jul 31 1996 | AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP SINGAPORE PTE LTD | Attenuation device for wavelength multiplexed optical fiber communications |
5768452, | Apr 17 1996 | AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP SINGAPORE PTE LTD | Radiolytic method for trimming planar waveguide couplers |
JP8184720, | |||
WO29881, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jul 09 1999 | Agere Systems Guardian Corp. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jul 09 1999 | NARAYANAN, CHELLAPPAN | Lucent Technologies, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010096 | /0223 | |
Jul 09 1999 | BARBAROSSA, GIVOVANNI | Lucent Technologies, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010096 | /0223 | |
Jan 30 2001 | Lucent Technologies Inc | Agere Systems Optoelectronics Guardian Corp | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 033664 | /0338 | |
Aug 23 2001 | Agere Systems Optoelectronics Guardian Corp | Agere Systems Guardian Corp | MERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 033684 | /0963 | |
Aug 22 2002 | Agere Systems Guardian Corp | AGERE Systems Inc | MERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 033684 | /0969 | |
Jul 30 2012 | AGERE Systems Inc | Agere Systems LLC | CERTIFICATE OF CONVERSION | 033685 | /0042 | |
May 06 2014 | Agere Systems LLC | DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT | 032856 | /0031 | |
May 06 2014 | LSI Corporation | DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT | 032856 | /0031 | |
Aug 04 2014 | Agere Systems LLC | AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP SINGAPORE PTE LTD | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 035365 | /0634 | |
Feb 01 2016 | AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP SINGAPORE PTE LTD | BANK OF AMERICA, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT | 037808 | /0001 | |
Feb 01 2016 | DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Agere Systems LLC | TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS RELEASES RF 032856-0031 | 037684 | /0039 | |
Feb 01 2016 | DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | LSI Corporation | TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS RELEASES RF 032856-0031 | 037684 | /0039 | |
Jan 19 2017 | BANK OF AMERICA, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP SINGAPORE PTE LTD | TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS | 041710 | /0001 | |
May 09 2018 | AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP SINGAPORE PTE LTD | AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LIMITED | MERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 047195 | /0026 | |
Sep 05 2018 | AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP SINGAPORE PTE LTD | AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LIMITED | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF MERGER PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 047195 FRAME 0026 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE MERGER | 047477 | /0423 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jul 14 2003 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Feb 24 2006 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Feb 19 2010 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Jan 29 2014 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Aug 27 2005 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Feb 27 2006 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 27 2006 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Aug 27 2008 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Aug 27 2009 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Feb 27 2010 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 27 2010 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Aug 27 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Aug 27 2013 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Feb 27 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 27 2014 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Aug 27 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |