A compact cascade impactor is formed to classify particles carried in a flow through the impactor. The impactor has collection chambers that are arranged to conserve space and yet provide a large flow passageway. The collection chamber may be tear drop shaped and being nested together. The impactor includes nozzles that are used across a desired flow range without changing the nozzles.
|
20. A cup for use in a particle classification impactor having flow carrying nozzles, the cup having a bottom wall forming an impaction surface, and having a peripheral wall forming an open top chamber, the cups have a wide end for receiving flow from a flow nozzle, and a narrow end and forming a flow path through the cup from the wide end to the narrow end, said cups thereby having generally a tear drop shaped open top.
13. An impactor comprising a housing, said housing having an inlet and an outlet, and a flow path through the housing, said flow path being divided into at least two flow segments, a nozzle between the flow segments, a collection chamber for receiving flow from the nozzle and collecting particles that are carried in the flow, the improvement comprising a pre-separator at the inlet of the housing, said pre-separator including a chamber having an inlet tube and an outlet tube, and having tapered internal surfaces that taper toward one of the tubes for permitting draining of material on the interior of the pre-separator.
1. An impactor for classifying particles according to size comprising a housing, a flow passageway through said housing, said flow passageway being divided into a plurality of individual passageway sections, a separate nozzle in each passageway section for carrying a flow between individual passageway sections, a particle collection chamber aligned with each nozzle and having an impaction surface to receive flow from the respective nozzle, each particle collection chamber having an output end joining other passageway sections of said flow passageway, said particle collection chamber having a large area portion immediately below its aligned nozzle, and having side walls tapering to a narrow portion at the output end of said collection chamber.
22. An impactor for classifying particles according to size comprising a housing, a flow passageway through said housing, the flow passageway being divided into a plurality of individual passageways sections, a plurality of particle collection cups, one aligned with each nozzle, the cups forming portions of the flow passageway sections, and each of the cups having a peripheral support flange around the periphery thereof, said housing including a base portion and an openable cover, and a tray positioned between the base portion and the cover, said tray having openings corresponding to the shape of the cups, and the peripheral flange being supported on the tray such that a plurality of the cups can be moved by lifting the tray when the cover is opened.
17. An impactor for classifying particles according to size, comprising a support, a flow passage defined relative to said support, said flow passage being divided into a plurality of individual passageway sections, a separate nozzle in each passageway section for carrying the flow between the passageway sections, a particle collection chamber aligned with each nozzle and having an impaction surface to receive flow from the respective nozzle, each chamber having an output portion joining other parts of a downstream flow passage, the particle collection chambers having support walls lying substantially on a common plane, wherein the passageway sections comprise tubes that taper in size between each impaction chamber and a next subsequent impaction chamber in the flow path.
19. An impactor for classifying particles according to size comprising a housing, a flow passageway through said housing, said flow passageway being divided into a plurality of individual passageway sections, a separate nozzle in each passageway section for carrying a flow between individual passageway sections, a particle collection chamber aligned with each nozzle and having an impaction surface to receive flow from the respective nozzle at an inlet end formed with an upright wall portion having a large radius to form the inlet end and carrying flow to a wall portion formed in a smaller radius at an output end, the collection chambers being positioned side-by-side and so the large radius inlet end of one collection chamber overlaps and is adjacent to a small radius outlet end of a next adjacent collection chamber.
2. The impactor of
3. The impactor of
4. The impactor of
5. The impactor of
6. The impactor of
7. The impactor of
8. The impactor of
9. The impactor of
10. The impactor of
11. The impactor of
12. The impactor of
14. The impactor of
15. The pre-separator of
16. The impactor of
18. The impactor of
21. The cup of
23. The impactor of
24. The impactor of
25. The impactor of
|
This application claims priority on provisional application Ser. No. 60/138,742, filed Jun. 11, 1999 for COMPACT, HIGH-PRODUCTIVITY CASCADE IMPACTORS.
The present invention relates to a particle impactor used for classifying particles according to size for analysis of the particles carried in a gas flow. Sharp particle cutoff is obtained, with compactly arranged impactor/collection cups and flow channels for conserving space, and providing accurate information about the particles.
Various types of impactors have been utilized in the prior art, including devices that use cascading elements for obtaining a classification of particles. Generally a cascade impactor has a plurality of collection stages arranged in series, with each stage having a nozzle or orifice plate with nozzle openings smaller in size than those of the previous stage, and also having an impaction surface for the collection of the particles that are too large to be carried farther in the fluid stream. At the smaller nozzle openings, the velocity of the fluid carrier is higher, and the particles have a higher velocity moving through the nozzle. The higher the flow velocity through the nozzle, the smaller the particles that are collected on the impaction plate. In other words, particles larger than the cut size of an impactor will impinge upon the impaction surface and the rest of the particles will pass with the fluid or airstream to the next stage. The particles that are collected at each stage can be analyzed by weight, or by quantitative chemical analysis. When the particles are to be chemically analyzed, it is desirable to collect the particles in a container or cup so the particles easily can be transported to a lab for analysis.
Another problem that arises with impactors is loss of particles due to the collection of some particles on surfaces other than the particle impactor surface, the collection on surfaces other than the impactor surface results in losses and these are called interstage particle loss. Minimizing such interstage particle loss is a desirable feature of the present invention
The present invention relates to a compact, high productivity cascade impactor that is easily used, manually or with a robot system and which provides for a broad flow range with quite precise particle cutoff sizes at the various stages. The physical construction makes the impactors of the present invention easily automated, and the usual final filters can be eliminated from the system and a microporous plate filter provided to avoid errors that may arise by contaminants on conventional filters.
The interstage passageways and the nozzles are designed so that they have low particle losses. The impactors thus are acceptable to regulators, such as the Food and Drug Administration and the British and European equivalents.
The impactor preferably has cups that are supported on a tray or frame. The cup tray and all the cups can be removed as a separate unit for quantitative recovery of material from the cups. The cup shape is chosen to reduce the space occupied by the impactor while not compromising the aerodynamic performance of the impactor.
A preferred form of the invention conserves space by utilizing teardrop shaped interstage passageways and collection cups. Other forms include stacked impactors, in order to provide for unique and compact units. The impactors are preferably constructed of inert materials, and are physically robust, and since they are metal and can be grounded they are unaffected by static.
The present invention is made with one set of fixed nozzles to achieve the desired range of particle size cut points, from about 0.5 μm to 10 μm at seven different cut points. At any flow rate, five or more of these are within the range desired for assessing the safety and efficacy of the drug formulation. The impactor is designed to accept a wide range of flows, for example between 30 liters per minute and 100 liters per minute, which is the typical flow range for testing inhalables as described in the United States Pharmacopoeial (USP) or corresponding British, European or Japanese Pharmacopoeials.
A first form of the invention illustrated in
The aerosol that is passed through the impactor 10 is an aerosol generated by a hand-held inhaler 17 or other device that may be a liquid or dry powder drug inhaler, such as those used to control asthma and similar problems. The amount of flow from each charge is small, so the internal volume of the impactor 10 must be kept low. For testing dry powder inhalers, accepted methods call for the total volume of sampled air to be between 2 liters and 4 liters. Therefore, the internal volume of the impactor must be low to achieve proper particle sizing. The internal volume or dead volume is preferably 1 to 2.5 liters. Small dead volume is important for achieving steady state flow during a typical breath volume of 2 to 4 liters. Steady state flow is achieved in about 0.2 seconds. The entire test is completed in 2 to 4 seconds. The flow rate through the impactor will be generated in a selected manner, for example by providing a vacuum pump such as that shown at 20 on an exhaust or flow outlet opening 22 from the impactor housing 12.
The impactor 10 of the first form of the invention is made to be compact so that it is easily used, portable and does not take up much space, and can be operated in a normal manner. The impactor 10 of the first form of the invention has a lid or cover 24 that is sufficiently thick to include flow passageways on the underside. The lid or cover 24 has the inlet 14 at one and thereof. The lid or cover 24 is hinged along one edge to a base frame 25 that has a number of egg shaped or teardrop shaped openings that receive and support impactor particle collection chambers or cups as will be shown.
As shown in
The impaction cups are tear drop shaped as shown. The large end 34E of the first stage cup forms the impactor surface and underlies the inlet opening 32. The flange 34B of the cup 34 is sealed with a seal 34D on the seal plate and extends transversely of the impactor to a vertical passageway 38 that opens through the seal plate 30 to interface or crossover passage 40 formed on the underside of the cover 24.
The crossover or interstage passageway 40 leads to a nozzle passageway or opening in seal plate 30 (
The crossover or interstage passageway 54 is also tear drop shaped as can be seen in
The crossover passage 62 also is tear drop shaped, and the large end of the crossover passage 62 opens downwardly through an opening in seal plate 30 which holds a nozzle 64 which has a selected number of openings 64A. The interstage or crossover passageway 62 is sealed with a seal 62A.
Nozzle 64 opens to a underlying cup 66 that again is tear drop shaped and provides a fourth stage impactor surface at its larger end. The cup 66 has a flange 66B sealed with a seal 66D and forms a passageway 66A that extends laterally back across the base frame 25 to a vertical port or passageway 68 through seal plate 30 that connects to a crossover or interstage passageway 70 in the cover 24. Passageway 70 has a larger end that opens through an opening in the seal plate 30 supporting a nozzle 72 with openings 72A. The interstage passageway 70 is sealed with a bounding seal 70A.
A cup 74 providing a fifth stage impactor and has an impactor surface at its large end that underlies the nozzle 72 and forms a passageway 74A that extends laterally back across the base frame 25 to a vertical port or opening 76 through the seal plate 30. The cup 74 has a peripheral flange 74B that is sealed with a peripheral seal 74D. The opening 76 connects to a crossover or interstage passageway 78 in the underside of cover 24. The opening 74E in the base frame 25 shown in
The crossover passageway 78 is tear drop shaped and opens to a nozzle supporting opening in the seal plate 30 having a nozzle 80 therein, with openings 80A that provides for a flow downwardly into an underlying sixth stage impactor cup 82 in an opening 82E in base 25. The nozzle 80 is retained in place with a rim 80D. The interstage passageway 78 is sealed with a seal 78A on seal plate 30. The cup 82 forms an impaction chamber and passageway 82A. The cup 82 is tear drop shaped and has an impaction surface at its large end. The cup 82 has a flange 82B supported on the cup tray, and a peripheral seal 82D on the seal plate seals around the cup. The cup 82 extends over to an opening or passageway 84 that leads through the seal plate 30 to a crossover interstage passageway 86 in the underside of cover 24 that forms a passageway section for carrying flow.
The crossover or interstage passageway 86 is sealed with a seal 86A on seal plate 30. The passageway 86 leads to an opening in seal plate 30 that has a further nozzle 88 that has openings 88A that open to an underlying cup 90 forming a seventh impaction stage. The cup 90 is tear drop shaped and forms a passageway 90A that extends laterally to a vertical opening 92 through seal plate 30 that leads to crossover or interstage passageway 94 in the cover 24. The cup 90 has a flange 90B that is sealed with a seal 90D on the seal plate. The flange 90B is shaped like opening 90E, and rests on the cup tray 36, as to all of the cups.
The passageway 94 opens to a final stage micro orifice filter nozzle 96 supported in an opening in the seal plate 30. The passageway 94 is sealed with a seal 94A on the seal plate that has openings 96A and which discharges the fluid into an underlying cup 98 that is tear drop shaped and opens to the fluid flow outlet passage 22 from the impactor.
In
The seal plate 30, as shown, and as was explained has "O" ring type seals thereon. The seal 78A is illustrated on the top side of the seal plate, against the surface of the cover 24, and a seal 82D is shown against the flange 82B of the cup 82. The seal receiving grooves that are formed in the seal plate 30 are shown at 32G and 32H, respectively, and are shaped so that they will permit the seals 78A and 82D, which are suitable durometer rubber, to spread slightly as the cover 24 is loaded against the seals and then the seal plate is loaded against the flange 82B, which in turn is supported by the cup tray 36. The cup tray 36 is supported on the base 25.
Each of the nozzle holders is formed with a sealing rim typically shown at 80D in FIG. 7 and is positively seated in an opening 31 in the seal plate 30 against a shoulder 31B, so that the distances from the nozzle to the cup such as that shown at 83 are precisely maintained. The nozzles are made so the rim and side walls are machined from a single block of material. The actual nozzle plate having the nozzle opening will be machined on the nozzles with larger openings. When small openings are needed, the nozzles are two pieces assembled together. The bottom wall or plate can be made by other processes to get the small holes needed. Then it can be brazed or otherwise sealingly secured to the lower end of the nozzle holder.
Also, the nozzle sealing along the surface 31 insures that there will be no flow leakage, and with the seals carried by the seal plate, which will expand into the grooves when compressed, positively sealing of each of the passageways, and on the cups along the cup flanges is maintained.
The cover 24 is hinged to the base with a hinge. As shown, a pin that is spring loaded is provided to permit some desired resilient movement perpendicular to the seal plate to provide compression of the seals on the seal plate 30. As shown in
As shown, the base frame 25 has a plurality of upright hinge posts 100, that are spaced along the hinging edge of the base frame and cover, and the cover has sets of flanges 101, that fit on the opposite sides of the posts 100. The flanges 101 carry a pivot pin 101A that passes through a slot 100B in each of the upright posts 100. The pivot pin 101B can move up and down in the slot 100B, shown in
When the cover is closed, and the seals on the seal plate engage the respective surfaces, the design is made so that there will be a load on the spring loaded plunger 102 tending to resist movement of the cover away from the base frame 25.
In order to have an adequate compression load on the seals, a cam type latch assembly 104 is utilized, and is shown in
The arms 104B in turn are pivoted to a latch handle assembly 105, at each of the arms, with a pin 105A positioned so that it will permit pivotal movement of the handle 105. The handle assembly 105 comprises a pair of end arm members 105B, 105B as shown in
The base flange 25 carries a plurality of latch hooks 106, which as shown in
As shown in
The handle 105C can be moved for release in direction as indicated by the arrow 106D. There is a double pivot about the pins 105A and the pins 104C so that the latch handle can be moved all the way up to a released position as shown in dotted lines in FIG. 4. When the latch is to be closed, it is moved down to a position shown in
As can be seen, there are four of the hooks 106 and four of the hinges 104A. The latch provides a positive lock. The cover hinge can be a pin hinge that does not move vertically and comprises hinge pins on the cover and bores for the hinge pins on the base frame. The pins on the cover can be fixed to ears and slip into the bores for pivoting when the cover moves laterally so that upon reverse direction movement the pins can be removed from the base for washing. Also, instead of the latch hooks being on the base frame 25, the hooks can be on the cover, and the pivoting arms and latch bar mounted on the base frame.
As shown in
As can be seen in FIG. 6 and other figures, the bottom surface of the base frame 25 is supported off the supporting surface with the feet legs 25F. The bottoms of the cups clear the supporting surface. This means that when the cover is opened, after the test has been run, tray 36 can be lifted out of the bottom frame, manually or with a fixture. When the tray is lifted all of the cups can be removed as a unit. The cups may be placed either in a separate container and sealed, or moved to another location for direct analysis.
The ability to lift all of the cups at once makes automation easier, because they can be installed in racks and moved as a unit. The cup tray has locating flanges 37 that act as feet when the tray is removed. The locator flanges 37 lap over the edges of the base to keep the tray 36 in place.
The cups also have outwardly tapered side walls so they can be nested and stacked for storage.
The flow paths are shown essentially in
The nozzles and the orifice sizes are selected to provide at least 5 cut points at all desired flow ranges that are between 0.4 μm and 6.0 μm. In addition, one stage should provide particles between 5 μm and 10 μm. A pressure drop across the impactor of less than 100 inches of water at the maximum flow rate is desired.
The designs for meeting Pharmacopoeial standards of the present invention have fixed nozzles and flow rates between 30 liters per minute and 100 liters per minute. The cut point of particles at the first stage (at the inlet) with a flow rate of 100 liters per minute (a maximum) will provide particles of about 6.0 μm. The cut point of the last stage at a minimum design flow rate of 30 liters per minute would be 0.50 microns.
The nozzles need to be spaced appropriately, and if they are too close to each other or to the wall of the impactor body, they will tend not to collect particles well. The cluster diameter of the nozzle openings and each of the nozzles is no more than two inches at any stage, which influences the overall design.
The flow range of 30 liters per minute (minimum) to 100 liters per minute is a selected range that is in keeping with hand-held inhalers and other equipment with which this device is to be used.
The impactors of the present invention obtain the desired range of cut points without having interchangeable nozzle plates. While the cut points will shift with flow rates, with 7 stages as shown, followed by a micro orifice filter, the desired range of cut points can be obtained from 5 or more of the nozzle plates.
The micro orifice filter is a nozzle that has a large number of small holes, and takes the place of, a conventional or absolute final filter typically used in impactor designs. The reason for designing the impactor with a micro orifice filter is that it is much easier to recover drug material from a micro orifice filter than from a conventional glass fiber or metallic final filter in manual and automated operations. The micro orifice filter is like an impactor stage with thousands of nozzles, each less than about a hundred microns in diameter.
The micro orifice filter is made to efficiently capture particles of about 0.1 μm to 0.2 μm, depending on the flow rate. The smallest particles captured by the micro orifice filter will be approximately ⅓ the size of the smallest particles impacted in the seventh stage of the impactor. Table I that follows shows impactor cut point characteristics obtained with the listed nozzle openings size, for three selected inlet flows in liters per minute. Table I, the "Stage Number" is the orifice plate shown in
The micro orifice filter is mounted the same as the nozzles on the seal plate 30 and can be removed for cleaning, as can the nozzles. Any particles in cup 98 will also be used in analysis.
The tables that follow are for illustrative purposes.
TABLE I | ||||
Impactor Cut-Point Characteristics | ||||
Inlet | Nozzle | Cut | ||
Flow | Stage | Diameter | Number of | Point |
(LPM) | Number | (mm) | Nozzles | (μm) |
100 | 1-32 | 5.49 | 12 | 6.00 |
2-44 | 3.06 | 24 | 3.49 | |
3-56 | 1.96 | 32 | 2.03 | |
4-64 | 1.18 | 52 | 1.18 | |
5-72 | 0.597 | 152 | 0.689 | |
6-80 | 0.317 | 400 | 0.401 | |
7-80 | 0.205 | 648 | 0.233 | |
Micro- | 3100 | |||
Orifice | ||||
Filter | ||||
60 | 1-32 | 5.49 | 12 | 7.77 |
2-44 | 3.06 | 24 | 4.53 | |
3-56 | 1.96 | 32 | 2.65 | |
4-64 | 1.18 | 52 | 1.55 | |
5-72 | 0.597 | 152 | 0.916 | |
6-80 | 0.317 | 400 | 0.546 | |
7-88 | 0.205 | 648 | 0.333 | |
Micro- | 3100 | |||
Orifice | ||||
Filter | ||||
30 | 1-32 | 5.49 | 12 | 11.0 |
2-44 | 3.06 | 24 | 6.45 | |
3-56 | 1.96 | 32 | 3.78 | |
4-64 | 1.18 | 52 | 2.23 | |
5-72 | 0.597 | 152 | 1.33 | |
6-80 | 0.317 | 400 | 0.808 | |
7-88 | 0.205 | 648 | 0.506 | |
Micro- | 3100 | |||
Orifice | ||||
Filter | ||||
Table II shows the Reynolds numbers and cumulative pressure drop for the respective nozzles at different diameters at the different stages shown in Table I.
TABLE II | ||||
Impactor Cut-Point Characteristics | ||||
Cumulative | ||||
Inlet Flow | Stage | Δ (inches | ||
(LPM) | Number | Nozzle Re | of water) | |
100 | 1-32 | 2070 | 0.11 | |
2-44 | 1860 | 0.41 | ||
3-56 | 2180 | 1.41 | ||
4-64 | 2220 | 4.24 | ||
5-72 | 1510 | 9.43 | ||
6-80 | 1080 | 18.9 | ||
7-88 | 1030 | 40.3 | ||
Micro- | 88.8 | |||
Orifice | ||||
Filter | ||||
60 | 1-32 | 1240 | 0.04 | |
2-44 | 1120 | 0.15 | ||
3-56 | 1310 | 0.51 | ||
4-64 | 1330 | 1.52 | ||
5-72 | 905 | 3.38 | ||
6-80 | 647 | 6.75 | ||
7-88 | 618 | 14.2 | ||
Micro- | 30.5 | |||
Orifice | ||||
Filter | ||||
30 | 1-32 | 622 | 0.01 | |
2-44 | 559 | 0.04 | ||
3-56 | 654 | 0.13 | ||
4-64 | 666 | 0.38 | ||
5-72 | 453 | 0.84 | ||
6-80 | 323 | 1.68 | ||
7-88 | 309 | 3.52 | ||
Micro- | 7.47 | |||
Orifice | ||||
Filter | ||||
It can be seen that the particle size cut points for each of the different stages, when having 7 stages, provides 5 stages which are within the range of 0.5 μm to 5.0 μm and one stage between 5.0 μm and 10.0 μm, with some variations in the ranges when single size, nozzles are used across the full range. The nozzles do not have to be changed to obtain the beneficial results.
With the inlet flow of 30 liters per minute, the cut points are essentially within the ranges desired are shown in stages 3-7, that is impactors 56, 64, 72, 80 and 88. When the inlet flow is in the nominal range of 60 liters per minute, where actual flow range may be between 50 liters per minute and 70 liters per minute, where many DPI devices will be tested, there are 5 stage cuts between 0.5 μm and 5.0 μm and one stage between 5.0 μm and 10.0 μm (stages 1-6, namely nozzles 32, 44, 56, 64 and 72). At the high flow of 100 liters per minute, stages 1-6 provide cut points between 0.4 μm and 6.0 μm. While the desired cut point is 0.5 μm, it is important to have one cut below 0.5 μm at the lowest stage, because of the fine particles that some drug companies are developing. 6 microns in stage 1 at 100 liters per minute as shown in Table I is between the 5-10 micron range for one cut point.
The pre-separator 16 is shown in
The impinger chamber 122 is designed so that most particles larger than approximately 20 microns and no smaller than 10 microns will strike the surface of the water when the inlet flow rate is 100 liters per minute. The remaining particles will then pass with the flow through the openings 118. The flow will accelerate in the openings so that all particles larger than 10 microns will collect on the surface 110A below the nozzle. The flow now ideally free of particles larger than 10 microns proceed through the opening 112 into the impactor inlet and to the first stage of the impactor 10.
The pre-separator can be quite small, for example, approximately 4 inches in diameter and 2.6 inches tall excluding the connecting fittings. The openings 118 have a diameter of 0.322 inches.
Approximately 20 ml of water will be in the impinger chamber 122, and the distance from the inlet to the surface of the water will be controlled so that air will flow around the top of the wall 120 and through the openings 118.
In
The first stage 134 receives the flow from the inlet 132 through a nozzle 133. The first stage housing 134 has a tear drop shaped chamber 134A. The large end comprises an impaction surface 134E, the flow then goes to the narrow end and through a cross or interstage passageway 134B and then through a nozzle passage 134C that has a nozzle plate 134D therein. The nozzle plate 134D is for the second stage impactor and has large openings. The flow will then pass into a second stage impactor housing 136, which forms a chamber 136A that is also tear drop shaped, as can be seen. The chamber 136A receives the flow and has an impactor surface 136E. As indicated by the arrows, the flow goes through a cross or interstage passageway 136B and then into a nozzle passageway 136C and through a third stage nozzle plate 136D that has smaller openings in it, than the second stage nozzle plate 134D as shown in Table I, for example. A different selected size of opening can be selected for different cut points.
The third stage housing 138 includes a third stage chamber 138A through which the flow will pass. The housing 138 has an impaction surface 138E on which particle above the cut point will impinge. The flow enters an interstage passage 138B, and goes into a nozzle passage 138C and through a fourth stage nozzle plate 138D which again has smaller orifices or openings than the third stage nozzle plate 136D.
The flow then passes into a fourth stage housing 140, having a tear drop shaped chamber 140A. It is the fourth stage housing 140 that is shown in FIG. 15. This again is typical of the housings that are shown. The particles above the cut point will impinge on fourth stage impactor surface 140E. The flow passes through an interstage passage 140B, and into a nozzle passageway 140C and through a fifth stage nozzle plate 140D. The opening size in nozzle plate 140D is selected to obtain the desired cut point.
The flow through the nozzle plate 140D enters a fifth stage housing 142, which has a tear drop shaped chamber 142A, and an impactor surface 142E that will serve as a collection plate for particles passing through the nozzle plate 140D that are above the cut off at this stage. The flow goes through an interstage passage 142B and into a nozzle passage 142C. The flow will pass through a further small opening sixth stage nozzle plate 142D. The flow then goes into a sixth stage housing 144, and the sixth stage housing 144 has an impaction surface 144E, in the chamber 144A. The flow then goes through an interstage passage 144B, and through a nozzle passage 144C and then through a seventh stage nozzle 144D into a chamber 146A of a seventh stage housing 146.
The seventh stage has a chamber 146A, with an impactor surface 146E. The flow will pass through an interstage passage 146B, through a nozzle passage 146C and through a micro orifice filter 146D having openings thereon to achieve the desired filtering. The flow will impinge on an impactor plate in housing 148 which has a chamber 148A that receives the flow from the filter 146D. The flow then will pass out through an outlet opening 148C. The micro orifice filter 148D has very fine openings in the nozzle plate as mentioned previously. A microporous filter can have in the range of 3100 openings, as shown in Table I.
The stacked design of
A further modified form of the invention is shown in
The impactor assembly 170 has an inlet tube 172 that connects to a standard inlet as shown, and flow comes through the nozzle 173 into an inlet or first stage housing 174. Housing 174 has an impactor chamber 174A, with a impactor wall or plate portion 174B aligned with the inlet nozzle 173. The flow in this form of the invention is shown in
Housing 176 has a chamber 176A into which the flow through the openings 174D passes. Particles above the cut off size impact on the surface of an annular impaction on wall plate wall 176B. The particles above the cut point will be collected on this annular surface 176B, and the flow in the chamber 176A will then go inwardly toward the center of the chamber 176A and through a center nozzle section 176C in the center portions of the wall, which has a pattern of openings or orifices 176D therein. The orifices 176D are arranged in a square pattern as can be seen in
The flow through the nozzle openings 176D will enter into a third impactor stage housing 178, that has a chamber 178A, with an impaction surface on an impaction plate 178B in the center of the chamber, to receive the flow coming through the nozzle openings 176D.
It should be noted that the walls forming the impaction surfaces are supported by the outer wall of the underlying housing, that is wall 174B is supported by 176E, and wall 176B is supported by wall 178E of housing 178. For convenience the impaction surfaces are described as part of the chambers above the walls. Also, the wall 176E has a lower flange 178F that nests on a shoulder 178E of the outer wall 178E of housing 178.
The flow from nozzle 176C then goes outwardly toward the outer periphery of the housing 178, and enters an annular nozzle 178C that has a plurality of openings shown schematically at 178D. The openings in nozzle 178C are smaller than previous nozzles, so that the flow through the openings 178D will pass into a fourth impactor stage housing 180 of the impactor.
The fourth stage 180 has a chamber 180A, and immediately below the annular nozzle 178C, there is an annular impaction surface 180B to receive particles at the cut point for this stage. The flow then goes in toward the center, where there is a center nozzle 180C that has suitable openings, that are of size such that they do not show up in FIG. 16. The flow through the nozzle 180C is through openings such as those shown in FIG. 18. The openings are smaller but still in the square pattern. A shoulder 180F of a peripheral wall 180E supports a lower portion of wall 178E, which nests in place.
The flow through the nozzle 180C then passes into a fifth impactor stage housing 182 that has a chamber 182A, and a wall 182B defining an impaction surface is below nozzle 180C to collect particles at the cut point passing through nozzle 180C. The flow in chamber 182 then moves laterally outwardly to an annular nozzle 182C that again has smaller openings or orifices than the nozzle 180C.
The annular nozzle 182C is arranged as shown in
The impactor 170 provides the range of cut points as shown in Table I, although the sizes may vary. The annular nozzles and center nozzles alternate between stages.
The impactor 170 can also have the pre-separator assembly on the inlet. The impactor assembly 170 can be disassembled by pulling the telescoping or nesting parts of the housings apart.
A second impactor stage 204 includes a tube 204D that has a tube section 204F that removably supports the outer edges of the cup 202C, and which surrounds tube section 202D. The cup 202C can be threaded directly to the end of a tube section 204F of tube 204 that forms a passageway to the next impactor stage, or otherwise sealingly, releasably connected in place.
The section 204F forms a passage 204A for carrying flow to a nozzle 204B and into a cup 204C. The tube 204D reduces in diameter in a downstream from the junction region 204H where tube 202 intersects tube 204D. A tube section 204G is of smaller diameter and is directed downwardly. The end of tube section 204G supports nozzle 204B. The cup 204C has an impactor surface that receives and collects the particles from the flow at the selected cut point, and is of large enough in diameter to provide a passage around the reduced size section 204G of tube 204D.
The edge of cup 204C is removably connected to the end of a tube 206D of an impactor stage 206. The tube section 204G intersects tube 206D at a junction 206H and reduces in size downstream from junction 206H at tube section 206G. The tube 206D forms a curved arched passage 206A that directs the flow through tube section 206G and through a nozzle 206B supported in tube section 206G and into a cup 206C. Cup 206C has an impaction surface for receiving particles at that cut point. The cup 206C surrounds and is spaced from tube section 206G and joins larger tube 208D and is supported on an end of a tube 208D is part of a fourth impaction stage tube 208. Tube 208D surrounds the tube section 206G, extends upwardly and curves into a "U" shape and carries the flow around the outer part of the tube 206D through a passageway 208A. A nozzle 208B is in a part of passageway 208A formed by a reduced size tube section 208G and into a cup 208C. The cup 208C forms an impaction surface for receiving the particles of size above the cut point, and is large enough to provide a passage around the tube section 208G and into a surrounding tube 210D of a further impactor stage 210. The cup 208C is removably sealingly mounted on the end of tube section 208D. The tube section passes through tube 210 at a junction 210H.
The tube 210D has an interior passage 210A that directs flow in an arched path. The tube 210 reduces in size in a section 210G that supports a nozzle 210B through which the flow passes into a cup 210C that forms an impaction surface and which is of large enough diameter to join a curved tube 212D of an impaction stage 212. The tube 210D intersects tube 212D at a junction 212H. The tube 212D has an internal passage 212A, that directs flow through a nozzle 212B in reduced diameter tube section 212G, and into a cup 212C, which forms an impaction surface for receiving particles above the cut point. Cup 212C is removably mounted on an end of a tube section 214D and surrounds tube section 212G.
The flow then goes from the cup 212C into a tube 214D of an impaction stage 214. Tube 214D has an internal passage 214A and a reduced size section 214G holding a nozzle 214B leading to a cup 214C. Cup 214C has an impaction surface for collecting particles. The tube 214D is formed as before. The tube section 212G passes into the tube 214D at a junction 214H. The cup 214C is supported on an outlet tube 216 that goes to a microporous filter and vacuum pump. The tube section 214G passes into tube 216 at a junction 214H. These tubes for the impaction stages 202-214, are supported on a support frame 218, of suitable design, and form the necessary impaction surface by having nozzles of the appropriate size for carrying the flows. The tubes 204D-214D all taper smoothly from large diameter sections to the small diameter sections. This causes a variation in flow velocity from each cup to the downstream filter.
All forms of the invention provide for compact arrangements, including the stacked units. The form of the invention shown in
All forms of the invention can be used with nozzles having openings as shown in Table I with the approximate pressure drops shown in Table II for the various stages. The accuracy is very high, even with hand-held inhalers where the hand-held generation of the aerosol or active ingredient carrying flow can vary substantially. It should also be noted that predose inhalers can be utilized with the present invention, where a measured amount of a dry powdery agent will be picked up in the flow, such as the breath flow, and this type of material can also be analyzed with the present impactors.
The interstage and other losses of particles are 5% or below with the present invention, which meets established requirements. The impactor provides a sharp cut of particles at each stage of the desired particle classification is thus obtained.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Marple, Virgil A., Liu, Benjamin Y. H., Roberts, Daryl L.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10806770, | Oct 31 2014 | Monash University | Powder formulation |
11085861, | Mar 03 2014 | MSP CORPORATION | Apparatus for real-time size-distributed measurement of aerosol mass concentration |
6647758, | Jul 23 1999 | MSP CORPORATION | Method and apparatus for verifying integrity of cascade impactors |
7721589, | Jan 31 2008 | Astech Projects Limited | Automated system for impactor testing |
8137446, | Mar 13 2007 | L-3 COMMUNICATIONS SECURITY AND DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC | Particle concentrator |
8252088, | Mar 13 2007 | L-3 Communications Security and Detection Systems, Inc. | Particle concentrator |
8596148, | Apr 11 2006 | Automated cascade impactor | |
8627731, | Apr 11 2006 | Lab Automate Technologies Inc. | Automated cascade impactor |
8671738, | Oct 02 2007 | Cascade impactor | |
9138671, | Aug 30 2012 | Cummins Filtration IP, Inc | Inertial gas-liquid separator and porous collection substrate for use in inertial gas-liquid separator |
9500569, | Oct 02 2007 | Cascade impactor |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
2538116, | |||
3127763, | |||
3518815, | |||
3693457, | |||
4133202, | Apr 22 1977 | The Regents of the University of Minnesota | Multiple nozzle single stage impactor |
4255172, | Feb 08 1979 | Andersen Samplers Inc. | Jet impaction preseparator |
4274846, | Feb 21 1979 | Andersen Samplers Inc. | Particle sizing sampler |
4321822, | Jun 05 1980 | The Regents of the University of Minnesota | Impactor apparatus |
4391151, | Jun 26 1981 | PIXE International Corporation | Circular two-stage air particulate and gas sampler |
4400982, | Aug 10 1981 | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, | High volume particle collector and fractionator |
4452068, | Feb 23 1982 | The United States of America as represented by the United States | Grooved impactor and inertial trap for sampling inhalable particulate matter |
4463595, | Feb 16 1983 | The United States of America as represented by the United States | Parallel flow diffusion battery |
4523990, | Mar 13 1984 | Mikropul Corporation | Particulate classifying apparatus |
4570494, | Apr 11 1984 | The United States of America as represented by the United States | Apparatus for sampling and characterizing aerosols |
4640140, | Dec 23 1983 | Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique | Aerosol sampler with cascade impaction and uniform deposition |
4725294, | Mar 13 1987 | VLSI Standards, Inc. | Apparatus for collection of particulate matter from an ambient gas |
4764186, | Mar 23 1987 | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE, AS REPRESENTED BY THE DEPT OF ENERGY | Particle impactor assembly for size selective high volume air sampler |
4827779, | Apr 22 1988 | Regents of the University of Minnesota | Cartridge personal sampling impactor |
4972957, | Sep 27 1988 | Regents of the University of Minnesota | Particle concentrating sampler |
5201231, | Oct 04 1989 | ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC | Volumetric air sampler for collecting multiple discrete samples |
5343767, | Mar 16 1992 | MSP CORPORATION | Low particle loss cascade impactor |
5437198, | Apr 06 1994 | Universal impactor for particle collection within sampling criteria | |
5693895, | Jul 18 1994 | Versatile airborne particle impaction sampler | |
DE2832238, | |||
DE3110871, | |||
DE3545120, | |||
GB1354261, | |||
GB2179273, | |||
JP560760, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
May 04 2000 | ROBERTS, DARYL L | MSP CORPORATION | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010793 | /0070 | |
May 04 2000 | LIU, BENJAMIN Y H | MSP CORPORATION | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010793 | /0070 | |
May 05 2000 | MSP CORPORATION | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
May 05 2000 | MARPLE, VIRGIL A | MSP CORPORATION | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010793 | /0070 | |
Jun 24 2005 | MILLER, NICHOLAS C | MSP CORPORATION | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016851 | /0907 | |
Oct 31 2016 | MSP CORPORATION | PNC Bank, National Association | GUARANTOR JOINDER AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT | 040613 | /0331 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Oct 26 2005 | M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
Jul 22 2008 | M1559: Payment of Maintenance Fee under 1.28(c). |
Jul 31 2008 | STOL: Pat Hldr no Longer Claims Small Ent Stat |
Dec 14 2009 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Mar 12 2014 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Sep 24 2005 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Mar 24 2006 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 24 2006 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Sep 24 2008 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Sep 24 2009 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Mar 24 2010 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 24 2010 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Sep 24 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Sep 24 2013 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Mar 24 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 24 2014 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Sep 24 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |