An integrated circuit fuse is formed on a substrate by etching a polysilicon, metal or alloy layer deposited thereon to include a central region, at the end of which are zones with electrical contacts. The central region has at least two first electrically parallel arms. A zone of intersection of the first two arms forms a point for focusing a fusing current which facilitates the fusing of the fuse by increasing local current density flowing through the integrated circuit.
|
11. An integrated circuit fuse comprising:
a first pair of electrically parallel arms contacting and forming a zone of intersection; a second pair of electrically parallel arms connected to the zone of intersection; and electrical contact zones at ends of said first and second pairs of electrically parallel arms.
1. An integrated circuit fuse comprising:
an electrically conductive region comprising a first pair of electrically parallel arms contacting and forming a zone of intersection for focusing a fusing current facilitating fusing of the integrated circuit fuse by increasing a current density of the fusing current, and electrical contact zones at ends of said first pair of electrically parallel arms.
2. An integrated circuit fuse according to
3. An integrated circuit fuse according to
4. An integrated circuit fuse according to
5. An integrated circuit fuse according to
6. An integrated circuit fuse according to
7. An integrated circuit fuse according to
8. An integrated circuit fuse according
9. An integrated circuit fuse according to
10. An integrated circuit fuse according to
12. An integrated circuit fuse according to
13. An integrated circuit fuse according to
14. An integrated circuit fuse according to
15. An integrated circuit fuse according to
16. An integrated circuit fuse according to
17. An integrated circuit fuse according
18. An integrated circuit fuse according to
19. An integrated circuit fuse according to
|
The present invention relates to the field of integrated circuits and, more particularly, to an integrated circuit fuse.
Forming fuses in integrated circuits is a practice well-known to those skilled in the art, especially in the manufacture of metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) circuits. For example, it is standard practice to form fuses to protect MOS transistor gates against the accumulation of electrostatic charges that appear during the manufacture of integrated circuits. These fuses are then disrupted or fused to release the gates of the transistors. Providing redundant word lines or bit lines in large capacity memories also rely on the use of fuses. The defective or unnecessary and redundant lines are then cut off from the rest of the memory by the fusing or disrupting of fuses.
Thus, in general, the fuses present in integrated circuits are designed to be fused by the application of a fusing voltage or current which enables modification of the configuration of a circuit at a final stage of manufacture.
A prior art fuse 1 of the type shown in
In order that the current density in the fuse 1 and the efficiency of the fusing may be a maximum for a given fusing current, the width W of the central region 2 of the fuse is usually chosen to be equal to the minimum width Wmin permitted by the manufacturing technology of the integrated circuit 10. For example, at present, a minimum width Wmin of a conductor for MOS type integrated circuits is commonly about 0.25 micrometers.
However, this precaution provides only a relative advantage, given that the minimum width determines the size of the other components present in the integrated circuit 10. This is particularly so for transistors, and their capacity to withstand high voltages or currents. Thus, in recent years, the reduction of the minimum width of a conductor as a result of advancements in manufacturing technology has gone hand in hand with a reduction in the permissible fusing voltages and currents. For example, the maximum fusing voltages permitted in medium-scale integrated MOS circuits according of the prior art technology were in the range of 5.5 to 6 volts. Today, large-scale integrated circuits using the most current technology have maximum fusing voltages of no more than 1.8 to 2 volts.
Thus, despite providing for a minimum width, a standard fuse does not, in statistical terms, provide a fusing efficiency equal to 100% under standard fusing conditions. In other words, to simultaneously fuse or disrupt a set of fuses present in an integrated circuit by applying one or more fusing pulses of current or voltage, it frequently happens that non-disrupted fuses remain. These fuses have an electrical resistance which, although it is higher than their initial electrical resistance, cannot be equal to that of an open circuit.
This drawback effects the efficiency in the manufacture of the integrated circuits, and becomes a significant problem when several tens, or even several hundreds of fuses are formed in the same integrated circuit. Another drawback of standard fuses is that they are not entirely reliable. A certain percentage of disrupted fuses have a tendency to regenerate, for reasons as yet poorly explained. In practice, the regeneration of a fuse is expressed by the fact that its electrical insulation properties deteriorate, whereas they were initially satisfactory.
Finally, the fusing current that can be applied to a fuse without going beyond a given fusing voltage is limited by the presence of parasitic resistors forming an access resistance to the fuse. It is known that the access resistance of a fuse includes the resistance of the electrical contacts 5, 6, which is generally in the range of 5Ω per contact, and the resistance of the zones 3, 4 between the contacts and the central region. The increase in the number of contacts makes it possible to reduce the access resistance. However, the number of contacts that can be planned remains limited by the small width of the central region 2 and the distribution of the current in the zones 3, 4. In other words, the widening of the zones 3, 4 to add yet additional contacts would not modify the access resistance.
An objective of the present invention is to provide an integrated circuit fuse that is fused more easily than a standard prior art fuse. An integrated circuit fuse according to the present invention reduces the fusing voltage applied to the terminals of the fuse, which correlates with the trend towards reducing supply voltages of integrated circuits.
Another object of the present invention is to provide an integrated circuit fuse that has increased fusing efficiency and reliability as compared to standard fuses.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide an integrated circuit fuse with low access resistance.
These objects are achieved by providing an integrated circuit fuse formed on a substrate by etching a layer of polysilicon, metal or alloy to include a central region, at the end of which are zones with electrical contacts. The central region has at least two first electrically parallel arms. A zone of intersection of the first two arms forms a point for focusing a fusing current which facilitates the fusing of the fuse by increasing the local current density.
According to one embodiment, the central region includes, beyond the intersection zone, two second arms positioned as a prolongation of the first two arms. Depending on the chosen embodiment, the arms may be arranged at right angles, and/or have the same length, and/or have the same width. Preferably, the arms have a width equal to a minimum width according to current manufacturing standards available for manufacturing integrated circuit fuses.
The objects, features and advantages as well as others of the present invention shall be explained in greater detail in the following description of an exemplary embodiment of an integrated circuit fuse according to the present invention, made on a non-restrictive basis with reference to the appended drawings, of which:
Thus, in the direction of flow of a fusing current, the fuse 20 includes two first conductive arms 22, 23, an intersection zone 24 where the two arms 22, 23 form no more than a single conductive element, and two second conductive arms 25, 26 positioned as a prolongation of the two first arms 22, 23. The arms 22, 23 and 25, 26 widen at their ends to respectively form zones 32, 33 and 35, 36, with each zone having a plurality of electrical contacts 40. Preferably, the zones 32, 33 and 35, 36 with the same electrical potential respectively have a common connection, i.e., respectively 34 and 37, which are also provided with a plurality of electrical contacts 41.
According to the embodiment shown in
The fuse 20 according to the present invention has the combined advantages of low electrical resistance and high concentration of current in the intersection zone 24. This allows for high fusing efficiency and a low probability of regeneration.
To provide a clearer picture of these advantages,
On the basis of the diagram of
Since the arms 22, 23, 25, 26 and the intersection zone 24 have the same dimension, the resistors R1 and R2 are identical and equal to the resistance per unit of surface area, or resistance per square unit R , of the material forming the fuse 20. The relationship (1) can be simplified and written as:
In comparison, the total resistance Rt' of a standard fuse in the shape of a small bar having a central region with a length equal to three times its width, formed by a material with the same conductivity, is equal to:
Thus, with respect to a prior art fuse, the fuse 20 according to the present invention advantageously has an access resistance Ra reduced by a ratio of 1/2, and a resistance of the central region 21 reduced by a ratio of 2/3. This ratio will continue to diminish if the length of the arms 22, 23, 25, 26 are increased.
Since the resistance R of a square is generally low as compared with the total resistance Rt of the fuse 20, the fuse may be considered to be the equivalent of two parallel-connected standard fuses. Thus, for a given fusing voltage Vc, there is the benefit obtained of a greater fusing current Ic than in the prior art.
This fusing current Ic is distributed, first of all, in the two arms 22, 23 and then is concentrated in the intersection zone 24 where a very high current density is provided. The zone 24 thus forms a weak point facilitating the fusing of the fuse. More particularly, the high current concentration makes the fusing faster and more efficient, so that the fuse offers high fusing efficiency and greater reliability than a standard fuse.
The intersection zone 24 furthermore makes it possible to localize the breakdown point of the fuse, and move this point away from the zones 32 to 37 where there is a larger quantity of conductive material. According to regeneration of the fuses, this aspect of the invention is likely to contribute to obtaining a low probability of regeneration of the fuse and, therefore, improve its reliability.
However, this approach will not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention and the various embodiments that can be implemented. Thus, for example, it may be conceived that the arms 25, 26 will be shortened or even eliminated to reduce the space requirement of the fuse. In this case, the breakdown point 24 of the fuse is in the vicinity of the zones 35, 36, 37. This alternative embodiment, as well as others, is open to further studies within the scope of those skilled in the art.
In general, it is within the scope of those skilled in the art to plan for, design and compare various other structures of fuses according to the invention. For example, Y structures with 5 arms, 6 arms, etc. may be considered. It is also within the scope to study, for each structure, the optimal dimension of the arms, their arrangement, the layout and the shape of the point of concentration of the current which allows for the most efficient performance characteristics.
The fuse according to the present invention is designed to be placed in an integrated circuit, for example, between two oxide layers. The contacts 40, 41 then take the form of metallized holes that open out onto the conductors. Apart from the metals and alloys that are conventionally used in microelectronics and which lend themselves to operations of etching by photolithography (especially Al, Ti, TiN, Ri/TiN, Cu, Al/Si, Al/Cu...), the fuse can also be made by the etching of a layer of doped polysilicon that has preferably undergone silicide treatment, (for example, in the presence of titanium Ti or Co, W, Ta) for providing an improvement in its electrical conductivity.
A polysilicon fuse according to the present invention may have a thickness of 0.20 micrometers for a width W of about 0.25 micrometers for each arm 22, 23, 25, 26, and a fuse made of metal may have a thickness of 0.50 micrometers for a width W of 0.40 micrometers.
Delpech, Philippe, Revil, Nathalie
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10886216, | Jul 27 2018 | SHANGHAI HUALI INTEGRATED CIRCUIT MFG. CO., LTD. | Electric fuse structure for optimizing programming current window of the electric fuse structure and manufacturing method |
8174091, | Jun 29 2004 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | Fuse structure |
8629050, | Jun 29 2004 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. | E-fuse structure design in electrical programmable redundancy for embedded memory circuit |
8866256, | Aug 31 2012 | Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC | Unbalanced parallel circuit protection fuse device |
9063241, | Oct 23 2012 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Power and telemetry signal transmission on cable |
9099467, | Jun 29 2004 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. | E-fuse structure design in electrical programmable redundancy for embedded memory circuit |
9196585, | Dec 03 2013 | Fuji Electric Co., Ltd. | Polysilicon fuse, semiconductor device having overlapping polysilicon fuse sections and method of severing polysilicon fuse |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5444287, | Aug 10 1994 | International Business Machines Corporation | Thermally activated noise immune fuse |
5572050, | Dec 06 1994 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Fuse-triggered antifuse |
5659182, | Mar 18 1994 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Three-terminal fuse |
5708291, | Sep 29 1995 | Intel Corporation | Silicide agglomeration fuse device |
5798534, | Aug 20 1994 | TPO Hong Kong Holding Limited | Manufacture of electronic devices comprising thin-film circuitry |
JP2186660, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
May 04 1999 | STMicroelectronics S.A. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jun 07 1999 | DELPECH, PHILIPPE | STMICROELECTRONICS S A | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010040 | /0368 | |
Jun 07 1999 | REVIL, NATHALIE | STMICROELECTRONICS S A | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010040 | /0368 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
May 10 2006 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Jun 30 2006 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Jun 30 2006 | M1554: Surcharge for Late Payment, Large Entity. |
Apr 20 2010 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Apr 21 2010 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Mar 26 2014 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 22 2005 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 22 2006 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 22 2006 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 22 2008 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 22 2009 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 22 2010 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 22 2010 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 22 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 22 2013 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 22 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 22 2014 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 22 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |