A process is provided for creating microstructure coupling guides for aligning photonic devices with optical signal carrying apparatuses. The process includes applying a photoresist to a semiconductor material, spinning the semiconductor material, baking the semiconductor material, exposing the photoresist, baking the semiconductor material a second time, and developing the resist. The process creates a microstructure that acts as an integral guide to align and maintain the relative position between an optical signal carrying apparatus and a photonic device.
|
1. Preparing a photonic device comprising:
a) applying a photoresist to a material having the photonic device; b) spinning the material to substantially evenly distribute the photoresist on the material; c) baking the material; d) imaging the photoresist; e) baking the material a second time; and f) developing the photoresist, thereby forming an integral guide on the photonic device, wherein the integral guide extends outwardly from the material to form a protrusion and is configured to align and receive an optical signal conveying element.
15. Preparing a photonic device comprising:
a) applying a photoresist to a material having the photonic device; b) spinning the material to distribute the photoresist substantially evenly on the material; c) baking the material; d) imaging the photoresist; e) baking the material a second time; f) developing the photoresist; g) depositing a metal within a region defined by the developed photoresist; and h) removing the photoresist, thereby forming an integral guide on the photonic device, wherein the integral guide extends outwardly from the material to form a protrusion and is configured to align and receive an optical signal conveying element.
3. The method of
a first baking temperature and a second baking temperature, wherein the first baking temperature is below the glass transition temperature of the photoresist and the photoresist is exposed to the first baking temperature for a predetermined period, then the photoresist is exposed to the second baking temperature for a predetermined period, wherein the second baking temperature is above the glass transition temperature.
4. The method of
6. The method of
17. The method of
a first baking temperature and a second baking temperature, wherein the first baking temperature is below the glass transition temperature of the photoresist and the photoresist is exposed to the first baking temperature for a predetermined period, then the photoresist is exposed to the second baking temperature for a predetermined period, wherein the second baking temperature is above the glass transition temperature.
18. The method of
20. The method of
27. The method of
28. The method of
|
This application is a division of application serial No. 09/111,943 filed Jul. 8, 1998 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,151,430.
The present invention relates generally to a wafer scale integrated coupling guide for use in photonic devices. More particularly, one embodiment of the present invention relates to the use of polymers, especially an epoxidized novolak (novolac epoxy), in the manufacturing of guide structures on photonic semiconductor wafers.
In the area of opto-electronic packages, it is generally accepted that the most time consuming and costly component of the package is the alignment of the optical fiber, or waveguide, to the semiconductor emitter or receiver. The traditional approach to this alignment requires that the two parts be micromanipulated relative to each other while one is operating and the other is monitoring coupled light. Once the desired amount of coupled light is attained, the two parts must be affixed in place in such a way as to maintain this alignment for the life of the product. This process, commonly referred to as active alignment, can be slow and given to poor yields stemming from the micromanipulation and the need to permanently affix the two objects without causing any relative movement of the two with respect to each other.
To alleviate this problem, opto-electronic package designs have been suggested which incorporate passive alignment techniques. These designs do not require activation of the opto-electronic device. Generally, they rely on some mechanical features on the laser and the fiber as well as some intermediate piece for alignment. By putting the pieces together with some adhesion mechanism, alignment can be secured and maintained for the life of the component. Typical of this technology is the silicon optical bench design. In this design, the laser is aligned via solder or registration marks to an intermediate piece, a silicon part, which has mechanical features--"v-grooves"-- which facilitate alignment of an optical fiber. The drawbacks to this design are the number of alignments in the assembly process and the cost of the intermediate component. Additionally, these designs can be difficult to use with surface emitting/receiving devices because of the need to redirect the light coupled through the system.
Other approaches have been suggested which do not incorporate a silicon intermediate structure. Swirhun et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,631,988) suggests that defined features in a surface emitting laser array could be used as an alignment means for a structure that holds embedded optical fibers. This third structure adds complexity and adds to the overall tolerance scheme for the alignment system.
In other prior art, attempts have been made to cope with the dilemma of adding intermediate parts and their associated costs and tolerances. Matsuda (U.S. Pat. No. 5,434,939) suggests a design that allows direct fiber coupling to a laser by way of a guiding hole feature in the backside of the actual laser substrate. The precision with which such guiding holes can be manufactured is not currently adequate for reliable coupling. Additionally, the process of making a hole in the actual laser substrate can weaken an already fragile material. Furthermore, this design is not appropriate when it is desired to have light emit from the top surface of the opto-electronic device, commonly called a top emitter in the vernacular of the industry. In contrast, a bottom emitter is a photonic device wherein the emitted light propagates through the substrate and out the bottom surface of the device.
What is needed is a photonic device that allows direct passive alignment and attachment of an optical signal carrying apparatus, such as an optical fiber for example, via robust guide features formed integrally on the surface of the photonic device. This photonic device would enable precise positioning of the fiber relative to the active region with the potential for sub-micron alignment accuracy without the addition of interfacial alignment components. Furthermore, it would be advantageous if the fabrication method for the above is compatible with standard semiconductor processing equipment.
In one embodiment of the present invention, a wafer scale polymer defining process is provided as well as an apparatus that uses a resist or photoresist to form microstructures for forming coupling guides on photonic devices.
It is an object of this invention to provide an article that comprises a photonic device having an integral polymeric guide.
It is a further object of this invention to provide an article comprising a photonic device with a plated guide, wherein the plated guide is formed in an opening in a resist prior to the resist being removed.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a photonic device with an integral guide formed from a photo-imagable polymer material.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a method of preparing a photonic device with an integral guide formed from a polymer material.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a method of preparing a guide on a photonic device comprising the steps of applying a resist, transferring an image to the resist, and developing the image.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a method of preparing a plated guide on a photonic device comprising the steps of applying a resist, transferring an image to the resist, developing the image, plating the resist, and removing the resist.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the accompanying figures. In the figures, like reference numerals indicate similar elements.
In Step 100, a photoresist or other resist material is applied to GaAs or another material such as a semiconductor material. A variety of traditional methods of applying resist to a semiconductor material can be used including using a dispensing tool such as a syringe, spatula, or other application device.
In a preferred embodiment the applied resist material is thick, mechanically stable, and capable of forming substantially perpendicular walls such that the guide created from the resist material has these features. A resist material that satisfies these needs is SU-8, which can form a coating (layer) as thin as 0.0015 inch thick and yet the layer remains substantially non-brittle and non-distortable. Additionally, SU-8 can be used to from thick (high) structures using conventional semiconductor manufacturing apparatuses.
SU-8, an epoxidized novolak, is sold under the tradenames EPON® SU-8 and Nano® SU-8, made by Shell Chemical Company of Houston, Tex., is available from Microlithography Chemical Corp., 1254 Chestnut Street, Newton, Mass. 02164-1418. This photoresist was developed and patented by Gelorme, et al. of IBM Corp., U.S. Pat. No. 4,882,245 for application on printed wiring boards. SU-8 has an epoxide functionality of approximately 8.0, an epoxide equivalent weight of approximately 195 to 230, and a melting point of approximately 77°C C. to about 82°C C.
SU-8 is an epoxy based negative acting photoresist. That is, the portions of the wafer that are exposed to light covered by SU-8 remains after the development process. SU-8 can be applied to a surface after which portions can be etched away, leaving very small scale structures (micro-structures). SU-8 is photosensitized with a triaryl sulfonium salt. Acceptable solvents for use with SU-8 include gamma-butyrolacate (GBL) available from Microlithography Chemical Corp., 1254 Chestnut Street, Newton, Mass. 02164-1418. Acceptable developers for use with SU-8 include GBL and propylene glycol methyl ether acetate (PGMEA).
The semiconductor material can be any practical size wafer, limited only by the availability of processing devices that can handle various wafer sizes. For example, 1 inch, 2 inch, 5 inch and 8 inch wafers are commonly used today, however, this invention could be utilized on small or larger wafer sizes including non-circular wafers. Preferably, the wafer used in step 100 has photonic devices within it such as surface emitting lasers, Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs), vertical cavity surface emitting lasers, photodiodes, photodetectors, light sensitive devices or other devices for emitting or receiving optical or photonic signals.
In step 110, the wafer with the deposited resist material is then spun at an appropriate rate, approximately 100 RPMs to 5000 RPMs, to form a uniform layer of resist. A consistent rotational speed can be used or a variety of speeds can be used to achieve the desired distribution of resist on the various portions of the wafer. In a preferred embodiment, this step results in the resist material being spread evenly over substantially the entire wafer. Various spin speeds and spin duration can be used to achieve a desired thickness and uniformity of the resist. For example, a wafer can be spun at 1000 RPM (revolutions per minute) for 15 seconds. For a given spin duration, slower spin speeds result in a thicker layer of resist and faster spin speeds result in thinner layers, for a given resist and starting volume. By varying the spin speed and the spin duration, a resist thickness of over a millimeter or less than a millimeter can be achieved. For example, a two inch wafer spun at 1000 RPM for 15 minutes results in 280 microns +/-20 microns of SU-8 resist thickness. The thickness of the resist after the spin step is, of course, dictated in part by the amount of resist that is initially applied to the wafer.
In step 120, the wafer with a substantially uniform layer of resist is then exposed to a pre-exposure bake. The wafer is baked until the resist film does not mark when it is lightly touched by a blunt instrument after the wafer has cooled to room temperature after the bake. For example, a two inch wafer can be baked at 95°C C. +/-2°C for 60 minutes +/-30 minutes. Initial empirical evidence shows that relatively fewer adverse effects result from over baking than from under baking. Finally, the wafer is allowed to cool to approximately room temperature.
In step 130, the pre-baked wafer is then exposed to a light source with a portion of the area covered by a mask between the wafer and the light source. For example, when SU-8 photoresist is used, a near UV light source approximately 350 to 400 nanometer ("nm") can be used in a contact aligner, such as a Karl Suss MJB-3. The duration of exposure depends on the intensity of the light and the thickness of the resist. For example, a two minute exposure of 400 nm light is suitable for 300 microns of resist.
In step 140, the exposed wafer is then exposed to a two temperature post-exposure bake. This step precedes the photoresist development step 150 discussed below. The post-exposure bake includes baking the wafer at a first temperature (T1) (
In a preferred embodiment, T1 (
The temperature is then ramped to the second post-exposure bake temperature (T2) over the time period t2to t3(FIG. 2). For example; a temperature increase from 53°C C. to 95°C C. over 5 minutes. The rate of transition between the two temperatures depends on the size of the elements being defined, the thickness of the resist, and the environment around the element. For example, smaller elements will move more than larger ones. Thinner resist layers exert less force than thicker layers. An element located relatively far from other elements will swing (shift) more than an identical element that is surrounded by other elements.
The temperature is maintained at T2for a period of time t2to t3. For example, 10 minutes. This is the high temperature bake. T2is higher than Tg.
In step 150, the wafer is developed. The wafer is removed from the post-exposure bake and immersed in a developing solution. Numerous commercially available developing solutions are suitable, such as gammabutyrolacate (GBL) or propylene glycol methyl ether acetate (PGMEA). It is desirable that the wafer be agitated during the development process. It is also desirable that the developing solution be refreshed periodically during the developing process. For example, replacing the developing solution every 3 minutes. Replacing the developing solution tends to enhance the development time. Once the development process is complete, the wafer can be rinsed in the developer and blown dry with nitrogen.
In step 160, the wafer is singulated. That is, components on the wafer are separated for example by dicing with a high speed dicing saw, slicing with a diamond tipped slicing saw, cleaving, or other method.
Following the process described in
Further enhancement of the mechanical properties is achieved by an optional hard bake of 200°C C.
The photonic device 300 can be a transmitter or receiver of optical or photonic signals. The laser substrate 302 can be Gallium-Arsenide (GaAs), Indium Phosphide (InP), or other suitable material.
In step 860 the wafer with the developed resist is plated. Plating can include, but is not limited to, electroplating. Appropriate plating materials include metals such as nickel, gold, copper and other metals. The plating step leaves the channels formed in the resist development step, step 850, filled with the plating material.
In step 870 the developed resist is removed by standard processes. Thus, the plating material can be used as guides for the fiber(s).
While a preferred embodiment has been shown and described, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the disclosure, but rather it is intended to cover all modifications and alternate methods and apparatuses falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims or their equivalents.
Lowes, Theodore D., Kilcoyne, Sean P., Donhowe, Mark N., Traver, Jr., Robert F.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
6817776, | Nov 19 2002 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of bonding optical fibers and optical fiber assembly |
7629595, | Jan 13 2006 | Hynix Semiconductor Inc. | Method for fabricating semiconductor device |
8992806, | Nov 18 2003 | Honeywell International Inc. | Antireflective coatings for via fill and photolithography applications and methods of preparation thereof |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4307935, | Nov 02 1978 | U S PHILIPS CORPORATION 100 EAST 42ND ST , NEW YORK, NY 10017 A DE CORP | Coupling device between optical fibers and electro-optical elements |
4779946, | Feb 14 1986 | American Telephone and Telegraph Company, AT&T Bell Laboratories | Microminiature optical assembly |
4826272, | Aug 27 1987 | American Telephone and Telegraph Company AT&T Bell Laboratories | Means for coupling an optical fiber to an opto-electronic device |
4882245, | Oct 26 1985 | International Business Machines Corporation | Photoresist composition and printed circuit boards and packages made therewith |
5093883, | Apr 26 1991 | Hoechst Celanese Corp. | Nonlinear optically responsive polymeric waveguides |
5125054, | Jul 25 1991 | Motorola, Inc. | Laminated polymer optical waveguide interface and method of making same |
5355386, | Nov 17 1992 | GTE Laboratories Incorporated | Monolithically integrated semiconductor structure and method of fabricating such structure |
5359687, | Aug 23 1993 | Corning Incorporated | Polymer microstructures which facilitate fiber optic to waveguide coupling |
5420954, | May 24 1993 | OPTICAL COMMUNICATION PRODUCTS, INC | Parallel optical interconnect |
5466558, | Oct 03 1991 | Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. | Method of manufacturing a light receiving module with optical fiber coupling |
5526454, | Apr 10 1992 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Method for producing optical polymer components having integrated fibre-chip coupling by means of casting technology |
5631988, | May 24 1993 | OPTICAL COMMUNICATION PRODUCTS, INC | Parallel optical interconnect |
5644667, | Mar 24 1993 | Fujitsu Limited | Integrated semiconductor optical devices and method of manufacture employing substrate having alignment groove |
5886102, | Jun 11 1996 | SHIPLEY COMPANY, L L C | Antireflective coating compositions |
6085007, | Feb 27 1998 | TE Connectivity Corporation | Passive alignment member for vertical surface emitting/detecting device |
EP446672, | |||
WO9702501, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Sep 26 2000 | Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Dec 17 2003 | Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc | The Regents of the University of California | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022177 | /0239 | |
Jan 30 2012 | Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc | W L GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 027906 | /0508 | |
Jan 30 2012 | Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc | W L GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC | NULLIFICATION TO VOID PROPERTY NUMBERS RECORDED ON REEL 027906 FRAME 0508 THAT WERE NOT OWNED BY THE CONVEYING PARTY INDICATED ON THE RECORDATION COVER SHEET | 028185 | /0179 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
May 01 2006 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Apr 29 2010 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Jun 06 2014 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Oct 29 2014 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 29 2005 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 29 2006 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 29 2006 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 29 2008 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 29 2009 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 29 2010 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 29 2010 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 29 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 29 2013 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 29 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 29 2014 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 29 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |