An inkjet printhead, typically constructed by MEMS process, includes a large number of nozzle chambers each with an ink ejection nozzle aperture and a paddle moveable in each chamber by an actuator to deliver ink through the aperture. Each paddle is provided with a projecting poker, concentrically protruding through the nozzle aperture when actuated to inhibit clogging of the nozzle.
|
1. An inkjet printhead having a plurality of nozzle devices each comprising:
an ink chamber having an ink ejection aperture, a paddle situated within the chamber, an actuator connected to the paddle so as to move the paddle toward the aperture, a projection extending from the paddle and configured to extend through the aperture when the paddle is moved by the actuator toward the aperture to eject a drop of ink from the chamber through the aperture.
9. In an inkjet printhead having a plurality of nozzle devices, each including an ink chamber having an ink ejection aperture, a paddle situated within the chamber and an actuator connected to the paddle so as to move the paddle toward the aperture, a method of improving operational characteristics of the printhead comprising the step of:
locating a projection on the paddle configured to extend through the aperture when the paddle is moved by the actuator toward the aperture to eject a drop of ink from the chamber through the aperture.
2. The printhead of
3. The printhead of
4. The printhead of
5. The inkjet printhead of
6. The inkjet printhead of
7. The printhead of
8. The printhead of
|
This is a Continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 09/425,416 filed on Oct. 19, 1999 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,299,289.
The present invention relates to the field of fluid ejection devices such as inkjet printers and, in particular, discloses the utilization of a poker on the ink ejection paddle.
Many different types of printing have been invented, a large number of which are presently in use. The known forms of printers have a variety of methods for marking the print media with a relevant marking media. Commonly used forms of printing include offset printing, laser printing and copying devices, dot matrix type impact printers, thermal paper printers, film recorders, thermal wax printers, dye sublimation printers and ink jet printers both of the drop on demand and continuous flow type. Each type of printer has its own advantages and problems when considering cost, speed, quality, reliability, simplicity of construction and operation etc.
In recent years, the field of ink jet printing, wherein each individual pixel of ink is derived from one or more ink nozzles has become increasingly popular primarily due to its inexpensive and versatile nature.
Many different techniques of ink jet printing have been invented. For a survey of the field, reference is made to an article by J Moore, "Non-Impact Printing: Introduction and Historical Perspective", Output Hard Copy Devices, Editors R Dubeck and S Sherr, pages 207-220 (1988).
Ink Jet printers themselves come in many different types. The utilisation of a continuous stream ink in ink jet printing appears to date back to at least 1929 wherein U.S. Pat. No. 1,941,001 by Hansell discloses a simple form of continuous stream electrostatic ink jet printing.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,596,275 by Sweet also discloses a process of a continuous ink jet printing including the step wherein the ink jet stream is modulated by a high frequency electro-static field so as to cause drop separation. This technique is still utilized by several manufacturers including Elmjet and Scitex (see also U.S. Pat. No. 3,373,437 by Sweet et al)
Piezo-electric ink jet printers are also one form of commonly utilized ink jet printing device. Piezo-electric systems are disclosed by Kyser et. al. in U.S. Pat. No. 3,946,398 (1970) which utilizes a diaphragm mode of operation, by Zolten in U.S. Pat. No. 3,683,212 (1970) which discloses a squeeze mode of operation of a piezo electric crystal, Stemme in U.S. Pat. No. 3,747,120 (1972) discloses a bend mode of piezo-electric operation, Howkins in U.S. Pat. No. 4,459,601 discloses a Piezo electric push mode actuation of the ink jet stream and Fischbeck in U.S. Pat. No. 4,584,590 which discloses a sheer mode type of piezoelectric transducer element.
Recently, thermal ink jet printing has become an extremely popular form of ink jet printing. The ink jet printing techniques include those disclosed by Endo et al in GB 2007162 (1979) and Vaught et al in U.S. Pat. No. 4,490,728. Both the aforementioned references disclosed ink jet printing techniques rely upon the activation of an electrothermal actuator which results in the creation of a bubble in a constricted space, such as a nozzle, which thereby causes the ejection of ink from an aperture connected to the confined space onto a relevant print media. Printing devices utilizing the electrothermal actuator are manufactured by manufacturers such as Canon and Hewlett Packard.
As can be seen from the foregoing, many different types of printing technologies are available. Ideally, a printing technology should have a number of desirable attributes. These include inexpensive construction and operation, high speed operation, safe and continuous long term operation etc. Each technology may have its own advantages and disadvantages in the areas of cost, speed, quality, reliability, power usage, simplicity of construction operation, durability and consumables.
Recently, the present applicant has disclosed for example, an Australian Provisional Patent No. PP6534 entitled "Micromechanical Device and Method (IJ46a)", filed Oct. 16, 1998 a new form of ink jet printer containing an ink ejection mechanism that includes a thermal bend actuator actuated in an external ambient environment which is interconnected with a paddle mechanism utilised for the ejection of ink.
Unfortunately, in the aforementioned ink jet printing arrangement as in most ink jet printing arrangements, there is a tendency of the ink ejection nozzles to dry out over time which can result in the build up of encrustaceans etc. Further, there is also the propensity of such devices to become clogged by other means such as foreign bodies in the ink or paper fibres, material etc. around the ink ejection nozzle.
Further, in the aforementioned arrangement, there is a significant gap left in one wall of the ink ejection chamber, the gap being required and utilized by the movement of the thermal actuator up and down during an ejection cycle. Unfortunately, the provision of the slot may cause ink flow to wick out of the nozzle chamber and along the thermal actuator which can cause problems with ink loss due to wicking. Such ink loss is generally undesirable.
There is disclosed herein an inkjet printhead having a plurality of nozzle devices each comprising:
an ink chamber having an ink ejection aperture,
a paddle situated within the chamber,
an actuator connected to the paddle so as to move the paddle toward the aperture,
a projection extending from the paddle and configured to extend through the aperture when the paddle is moved by the actuator toward the aperture to eject a drop of ink from the chamber through the aperture.
Preferably the ink chamber of each nozzle device is supplied with ink via at least one conduit in an underlying substrate.
Preferably the projection is an elongate poker member, a free end of which is positioned to protrude at least into the aperture when the paddle is moved by the actuator toward the aperture to eject a drop of ink from the chamber.
Preferably the projection of each nozzle device is located concentrically with the aperture.
Preferably the aperture is formed by MEMS process in which a series of layers are deposited and etched and the projection comprises a hollow cylindrical column.
Preferably the hollow cylindrical column includes a proximal end at the paddle and a distal end adjacent the aperture, said distal end being chemically mechanically planarized during formation of the aperture.
Preferably the actuator is a thermal bend actuator conductively heated so as to cause movement of said paddle.
Preferably the projection is located substantially centrally on the paddle.
There is further disclosed herein an inkjet printhead having a plurality of nozzle devices, each including an ink chamber having an ink ejection aperture, a paddle situated within the chamber and an actuator connected to the paddle so as to move the paddle toward the aperture, a method of improving operational characteristics of the printhead comprising the step of:
locating a projection on the paddle configured to extend through the aperture when the paddle is moved by the actuator toward the aperture to eject a drop of ink from the chamber through the aperture.
Notwithstanding any other forms which may fall within the scope of the present invention, preferred forms of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
In the preferred embodiment, a paddle is formed with a "poker" device attached in a central portion thereof such that, during movement of the paddle, the poker device pokes any unwanted foreign body or material which should congregate around the nozzle, out of the nozzle. The poker can be formed during fabrication of the ink ejection nozzle arrangement by means of a chemical mechanical planarization step with, preferably, the formation being a byproduct of the normal formation steps for forming the ink ejection nozzle on arrangement on a semi-conductor wafer utilizing standard MEMS processing techniques.
Additionally, in order to restrict the amount of wicking and the opportunities for wicking, an actuator slot guard is provided, formed on the bend actuator itself, closely adjacent to the actuator slot so as to restrict the opportunities for flow of fluid out of the nozzle chamber due to surface tension effects.
Turning now to
Next, as illustrated in
Further, the movement of the actuator 6 results in a slight movement of the actuator slot protection barrier 16 which maintains substantially the small dimensioned meniscus 19 thereby reducing the opportunity for ink wicking along surfaces. Subsequently, the conductive heater 9 is turned off and the actuator 6 begins to rapidly return to its original position. The forward momentum of the ink around meniscus 4 in addition to the backflow due to return movement of the actuator 6 results in a general necking and breaking of the meniscus 4 so as to form a drop.
The situation a short time later is as illustrated in
Turning now to
It would be appreciated by a person skilled in the art that numerous variations and/or modifications may be made to the present invention as shown in the specific embodiment without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as broadly described. The present embodiment is, therefore, to be considered in all respects to be illustrative and not restrictive.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
7293359, | Apr 29 2004 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method for manufacturing a fluid ejection device |
7387370, | Apr 29 2004 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Microfluidic architecture |
7543915, | Apr 29 2004 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Fluid ejection device |
7798612, | Apr 29 2004 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Microfluidic architecture |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
6027205, | Jan 31 1996 | Neopost Limited | Ink jet printing device |
6299289, | Sep 11 1998 | Zamtec Limited | Inkjet printhead with nozzle pokers |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Sep 20 2001 | SILVERBROOK, KIA | SILVERBROOK RESEARCH PTY LTD | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012224 | /0165 | |
Sep 28 2001 | Silverbrook Research Pty LTD | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
May 03 2012 | SILVERBROOK RESEARCH PTY LIMITED AND CLAMATE PTY LIMITED | Zamtec Limited | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 028537 | /0909 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jun 02 2006 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Jul 21 2006 | STOL: Pat Hldr no Longer Claims Small Ent Stat |
Jul 24 2006 | R2551: Refund - Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
May 23 2010 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Jul 11 2014 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Dec 03 2014 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Dec 03 2005 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jun 03 2006 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 03 2006 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Dec 03 2008 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Dec 03 2009 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jun 03 2010 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 03 2010 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Dec 03 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Dec 03 2013 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jun 03 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 03 2014 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Dec 03 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |