A method is provided for controlling operation of a subsurface hydraulically operated well tool. In a described embodiment, a surface controlled subsurface safety valve is controlled utilizing two control lines. The control lines are hydraulically connected to respective ones of two pistons in the safety valve. pressure applied to either of the two pistons is capable of independently operating the safety valve. In normal operation, pressure is applied to both of the pistons. However, when a failure occurs in one of the control lines, the other may still be used to operate the safety valve.
|
10. A method of controlling a subsurface hydraulically actuated well tool, the method comprising the steps of:
providing the well tool as a surface controlled safety valve, the safety valve including first and second pistons operatively connected to an opening mechanism of the safety valve, and the first and second pistons being hydraulically isolated from each other in the safety valve; operating the safety valve by simultaneously applying pressure to both of first and second control lines hydraulically connected to the first and second pistons, respectively; and then operating the safety valve by applying pressure to only the second control line.
7. A method of controlling a subsurface hydraulically actuated well tool, the method comprising the steps of:
hydraulically connecting a first control line to a first piston of the well tool, the well tool being operable in response to pressure in the first control line; hydraulically connecting a second control line to a second piston of the well tool, the well tool being operable in response to pressure in the second control line; operating the well tool using a single pump simultaneously applying pressure to both of the first and second control lines; and then operating the well tool using the same pump applying pressure to only the second control line.
1. A method of controlling a subsurface hydraulically actuated well too, the method comprising the steps of:
hydraulically connecting a first control line to a first piston of the well tool, the well tool being operable in response to pressure in the first control line; hydraulically connecting a second control line to a second piston of the well tool, the well tool being operable in response to pressure in the second control line; operating the well tool by simultaneously applying pressure to both of the first and second control lines; and then, in response to failure of the first control line, operating the well tool by applying pressure only to the second control line.
2. The method according to
3. The method according to
4. The method according to
5. The method according to
6. The method according to
monitoring pressure in the first control line using a first pressure indicator connected to the first control line between the first valve and the first piston; and monitoring pressure in the second control line using a second pressure indicator connected to the second control line between the second valve and the second piston.
8. The method according to
hydraulically connecting the pump to the first control line via a first valve; and hydraulically connecting the pump to the second control line via a second valve.
9. The method according to
11. The method according to
12. The method according to
13. The method according to
14. The method according to
15. The method according to
16. The method according to
17. The method according to
monitoring pressure in the first control line using a first pressure indicator connected to the first control line between the first valve and the first piston; and monitoring pressure in the second control line using a second pressure indicator connected to the second control line between the second valve and the second piston.
18. The method according to
19. The method according to
20. The method according to
|
The present invention relates generally to operations performed in conjunction with a subterranean well and, in an embodiment described herein, more particularly provides a method of controlling a hydraulically actuated subsurface well tool.
Safety valves are being installed at progressively greater depths in wells. These increasing safety valve depths have created numerous problems for those responsible for the valve installations and operations.
One of these problems has to do with the need to run a control line to a safety valve installed at a very deep location in a well. An increase in the length of a control line brings with it the increased probability that a failure will be experienced in the control line at some point in the productive life of the well. This is due to, for example, an increased number of connections in the control line, an increased number of control line tubing sections, an increased probability of damage during installation, etc.
Various solutions have been proposed for dealing with this problem. Unfortunately, however, these prior solutions have required installation of an inordinate amount of additional equipment at the well, undue complexity and/or an increased probability of experiencing a failure requiring replacement of the safety valve, with the associated expense of killing the well, pulling the production string and installing a new production string.
What is needed is a method of controlling a hydraulically actuated subsurface well tool which does not require a large investment in additional equipment, which is relatively simple in construction and use, and which provides true redundancy for control lines installed in a well.
In carrying out the principles of the present invention, in accordance with an embodiment thereof, a method is provided which solves the above problems in the art.
In one aspect of the present invention, a method of controlling a subsurface hydraulically actuated well tool is provided. The method includes the steps of hydraulically connecting a first control line to a first piston of the well tool and hydraulically connecting a second control line to a second piston of the well tool. The well tool is operable in response to pressure in the first control line, and the well tool is operable in response to pressure in the second control line. The well tool is operated by applying pressure to both of the first and second control lines, and then, in response to failure of the first control line, the well tool is operated by applying pressure only to the second control line.
In another aspect of the present invention, a single pump is used to operate the well tool when applying pressure to both of the first and second control lines. The same pump is then used when operating the well tool by applying pressure to only the second control line.
In yet another aspect of the present invention, a method of controlling a surface controlled subsurface safety valve is provided. The safety valve includes first and second pistons operatively connected to an opening mechanism of the safety valve. The first and second pistons are hydraulically isolated from each other in the safety valve.
The safety valve is operated by applying pressure to both of first and second control lines hydraulically connected to the first and second pistons, respectively. Then the safety valve is operated by applying pressure to only the second control line.
These and other features, advantages, benefits and objects of the present invention will become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon careful consideration of the detailed description of a representative embodiment of the invention hereinbelow and the accompanying drawings.
In the following description, directional terms, such as "above", "below", "upper", "lower", etc., are used only for convenience in referring to the accompanying drawings. Additionally, it is to be understood that the various embodiments of the present invention described herein may be utilized in various orientations, such as inclined, inverted, horizontal, vertical, etc., and in various configurations, without departing from the principles of the present invention.
Representatively illustrated in
If a failure is experienced in one of the hydraulic actuation systems, the other hydraulic actuation system is used to control operation of the safety valve 12. Thus, the hydraulic actuation systems are used alternatively, i.e., only one of the hydraulic actuation systems is used at a time.
Note that one or more actuating pistons (not shown) of the safety valve 12 may be hydraulically connected to each of the control lines 14, 16, in which case a complex hydraulic switching system may be used in the safety valve to provide for the event of a failure in one of the control lines 14, 16.
Representatively illustrated in
If a failure is experienced in one of the safety valve systems, the other safety valve system is used. While the method 22 does provide redundancy in the event of a control line failure, it does so at the expense of a large amount of additional equipment and added complexity.
For example, during production of the well one of the safety valves 24, 26 must be locked open while the other safety valve is being used, or it must be kept open using its associated pump and control line. In the former case, the locked open safety valve must be restored to an operating configuration (unlocked) if the other safety valve's control line fails, and the other safety valve must then be locked open. In the latter case, both complete safety valve systems must be operated, tested and maintained for the entire productive life of the well.
Referring additionally now to
The method 40 accomplishes these results by utilizing multiple actuating pistons 44, 46 in the safety valve 42. Each of the pistons 44, 46 is hydraulically connected to a respective one of multiple control lines 48, 50 extending to a remote location, such as the surface of the well.
Note that pressure applied to either of the pistons 44 or 46 via its respective control line 50 or 48 is capable of operating the safety valve 42, for example, by displacing an opening prong or flow tube 52 to actuate a flapper valve 54 of the safety valve 42. Persons skilled in the art are familiar with the use of a piston to actuate a flapper valve of a safety valve, and so no further description of this actuation will be presented herein. However, it is to be clearly understood that other types of safety valves, such as a safety valve having a ball valve instead of a flapper valve, may be used and other types of hydraulically actuated well tools may be used, without departing from the principles of the present invention.
In addition, note that the pistons 44, 46 are hydraulically isolated from each other in the safety valve 42. Thus, no hydraulic switching system must be used in the safety valve 42 in the event that a failure occurs in one of the control lines 48, 50.
In normal operation of the safety valve 42, pressure is applied to both of the control lines 48, 50 by a single pump 56. Multiple pumps are not required. Instead, a set of valves 58, 6o are used to select which of the control lines 48, 50 pressure is applied to from the pump 56. Since, in normal operation, pressure is applied to both of the control lines 48, 50, both of the valves 58, 60 are normally open.
If, however, a failure occurs in one of the control lines 48, 50, the corresponding valve 58 or 60 is closed, and the safety valve 42 is operated using pressure applied to the other control line. Thus, if a connector or one of the lengths of control line tubing in the control line 48 begins to leak, the valve 58 will be closed, and the safety valve 42 will be operated using pressure applied to the control line 50. Similarly, if a connector or one of the lengths of control line tubing in the control line 50 begins to leak, the valve 60 will be closed, and the safety valve 42 will be operated using pressure applied to the control line 48.
A failure of either of the control lines 48, 50 below a wellhead 66 of the well may be detected by monitoring pressure indicators 62, 64 readable at the surface above the wellhead and connected to the control lines, respectively, between the valves 58, 60 and the safety valve 42. The pressure indicators 62, 64 are depicted in
Note that, in the method 40, a failure of either of the control lines 48, 50 below the wellhead 66 may be remedied by observations made, and actions taken, above the wellhead. No change in the downhole safety valve 42 or control lines 48, 50 below the wellhead 66 need to be made.
It will be readily appreciated by one skilled in the art that, if pressure applied to only one of the pistons 44, 46 is used to operate the safety valve 42 due to failure of one of the control lines 48, 50, a greater pressure will typically be required to maintain the safety valve in an open position than if pressure were applied to both of the pistons. Thus, when pressure is applied to only one of the control lines 48, 50 to operate the safety valve 42, more pressure should be applied by the pump 56 to the control line. However, it will be recognized that this is far preferable to pulling the production string out of the well to repair the failed control line.
In most circumstances, a control line failure after initial installation and verification of pressure integrity is experienced only after a well has been in production for an extended period of time, for example, due to corrosion gradually deteriorating the control line tubing or connections. In these circumstances, wellbore hydrostatic pressure will likely have decreased due to the extended period of production of fluid from the well, and so a substantial increase in pressure applied to the remaining control line may not be required.
Of course, a person skilled in the art would, upon a careful consideration of the above description of representative embodiments of the invention, readily appreciate that many modifications, additions, substitutions, deletions, and other changes may be made to these specific embodiments, and such changes are contemplated by the principles of the present invention. Accordingly, the foregoing detailed description is to be clearly understood as being given by way of illustration and example only, the spirit and scope of the present invention being limited solely by the appended claims.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10041330, | Jul 30 2012 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Stacked piston safety valves and related methods |
11136861, | Mar 14 2016 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Mechanisms for transferring hydraulic regulation from a primary safety valve to a secondary safety valve |
6988556, | Feb 19 2002 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.; Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Deep set safety valve |
7213653, | Feb 19 2002 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Deep set safety valve |
7347270, | Oct 20 2004 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Redundant hydraulic system for safety valve |
7434626, | Feb 19 2002 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Deep set safety valve |
7624807, | Feb 19 2002 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Deep set safety valve |
7640989, | Aug 31 2006 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.; Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Electrically operated well tools |
7954552, | May 14 2008 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Overriding a primary control subsystem of a downhole tool |
8038120, | Dec 29 2006 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Magnetically coupled safety valve with satellite outer magnets |
8186439, | Dec 19 2007 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Controller for a hydraulically operated downhole tool |
8360158, | May 14 2008 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Overriding a primary control subsystem of a downhole tool |
8453749, | Feb 29 2008 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Control system for an annulus balanced subsurface safety valve |
8490687, | Aug 02 2011 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Safety valve with provisions for powering an insert safety valve |
8511374, | Aug 02 2011 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Electrically actuated insert safety valve |
8573304, | Nov 22 2010 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Eccentric safety valve |
8616291, | Sep 24 2010 | WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC | Fail safe regulator for deep-set safety valve having dual control lines |
8640769, | Sep 07 2011 | Wells Fargo Bank, National Association | Multiple control line assembly for downhole equipment |
8869881, | Nov 22 2010 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Eccentric safety valve |
8919730, | Dec 29 2006 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Magnetically coupled safety valve with satellite inner magnets |
9828824, | May 01 2015 | HYDRIL USA DISTRIBUTION, LLC | Hydraulic re-configurable and subsea repairable control system for deepwater blow-out preventers |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3441084, | |||
3786867, | |||
4026355, | Jun 30 1975 | NRG Nufuel Company; Reserve Synthetic Fuels, Inc. | Method for testing and monitoring for producing landfill gas |
4161219, | Feb 27 1978 | CAMCO INTERNATIONAL INC , A CORP OF DE | Piston actuated well safety valve |
4187876, | May 08 1978 | VETCO GRAY INC , | Sub-surface gate valve |
4252197, | Feb 27 1978 | CAMCO INTERNATIONAL INC , A CORP OF DE | Piston actuated well safety valve |
4495998, | Mar 12 1984 | Camco, Incorporated | Tubing pressure balanced well safety valve |
4598773, | Feb 15 1984 | CAMCO INTERNATIONAL INC , A CORP OF DE | Fail-safe well safety valve and method |
4621695, | Aug 27 1984 | CAMCO INTERNATIONAL INC , A CORP OF DE | Balance line hydraulically operated well safety valve |
4660646, | Nov 27 1985 | CAMCO INTERNATIONAL INC , A CORP OF DE | Failsafe gas closed safety valve |
4676307, | May 21 1984 | CAMCO INTERNATIONAL INC , A CORP OF DE | Pressure charged low spread safety valve |
5167284, | Jul 18 1991 | Camco International Inc.; CAMCO INTERNATIONAL INC , A CORPORATION OF DE | Selective hydraulic lock-out well safety valve and method |
5310004, | Jan 13 1993 | Camco International Inc.; CAMCO INTERNATIONAL INC | Fail safe gas bias safety valve |
5343955, | Apr 28 1992 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Tandem wellbore safety valve apparatus and method of valving in a wellbore |
6179052, | Aug 13 1998 | WELLDYNAMICS INC | Digital-hydraulic well control system |
WO4274, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Mar 14 2001 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jul 02 2001 | SIMONDS, FLOYD R | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 011984 | /0717 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Nov 08 2002 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
May 24 2006 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
May 21 2010 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
May 28 2014 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Dec 10 2005 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jun 10 2006 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 10 2006 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Dec 10 2008 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Dec 10 2009 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jun 10 2010 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 10 2010 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Dec 10 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Dec 10 2013 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jun 10 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 10 2014 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Dec 10 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |