In many optics applications, it is desirable to retard the polarization of a light wave, i.e., to change the polarization state of a light wave. In a method for retarding polarization of a light wave, a first linear polarization-maintaining fiber having a first beat length is spliced to a second polarization-maintaining fiber having a high birefringence and a second beat length. The second fiber is then cleaved to a length which is a fraction of the second beat length. The first fiber and the second fiber may be secured in a removable or permanent capillary. A light wave is transmitted into the first fiber and the polarization state of the light wave is determined. To adjust the polarization state, the second fiber may be lapped against an abrasive substance. The second fiber may be repeatedly lapped until a desired polarization state is achieved. In an alternate method, a first linear polarization-maintaining fiber is spliced to a second polarization-maintaining fiber having a high birefringence and a beat length. The second fiber is cleaved to a length which is a fraction of the beat length and a third fiber is spliced to the second fiber. A light wave is transmitted through the fibers and the polarization state of the light wave is determined. All or part of the second fiber may be heated to adjust the polarization state of a light wave. The second fiber may be repeatedly heated until a desired polarization state is achieved.
|
10. A method for converting polarization states of a light wave from an initial polarization state to a desired polarization state, said method comprising the steps of:
(a) splicing a first linear polarization-maintaining fiber to a second polarization-maintaining fiber having a high birefringence and a beat length; (b) cleaving said second fiber to a length d; (c) splicing a third polarization-maintaining fiber having a low birefringence to said second fiber; (d) transmitting the light wave into said first fiber; (e) determining the polarization state of the light wave exiting said third polarization-maintaining fiber; and (f) heating at least a portion of said second fiber.
1. A method for retarding polarization of a light wave in an optical fiber to obtain a selected polarization state, said method comprising the steps of:
(a) splicing a second end of a first linear polarization-maintaining fiber having a first beat length to a first end of a second polarization-maintaining fiber having a high birefringence and a second beat length; (b) cleaving said second polarization-maintaining fiber at a second end thereof such that said second polarization-maintaining fiber has a length d; (c) securing said first fiber and said second fiber in a glass capillary; (d) directing the light wave into a first end of said first fiber; and (e) determining a polarization state of the light wave exiting said second end of said second fiber; (f) lapping said second end of said second fiber against an abrasive substance; and (g) repeating steps (d) and (e) if said polarization state is not sufficiently close to said desired polarization state.
17. A method for retarding polarization of a light wave in an optical fiber to obtain a desired polarization state, said method comprising the steps of:
(a) splicing a first fiber segment to a second fiber segment where, said first and second fiber segments are polarization-maintaining fibers each having first and second opposite ends, and each having first and second polarization axes, and each having a known beat length, and said second of said first fiber is splice to said first end of second fiber such that said first polarization axes of said first fiber is at approximately forty-five degrees with respect to said first polarization axes of said second fiber at said slice; (b) cleaving said second fiber segment at a second end thereof such that said second fiber segment has a length d; (c) securing said first fiber segment and said second fiber segment in a glass capillary; (d) directing the light wave into a first end of said first fiber segment; and (e) determining a polarization state of the light wave exiting said second end of said second fiber segment; (f) lapping said second end of said second fiber against an abrasive substance; and (g) repeating steps (d) and (e) if said polarization state is not sufficiently close to said desired polarization state.
2. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
where m is an integer, including zero.
7. The method of
8. The method of
9. The method of
11. The method of
12. The method of
13. The method of
14. The method of
16. The method of
where m is an integer, including zero.
|
The present invention generally relates to current sensors. More particularly, the present invention relates to a method for polarization state conversion of an electromagnetic wave.
Magnetic fields interact with circularly-polarized light waves propagating through optical fiber under a principle known as the magneto-optic Faraday effect. Under this principle, a magnetic field will rotate the plane of polarization of circularly-polarized light waves traveling in opposite directions and thereby cause a phase shift to occur between the relative phases of the two light waves. This phase shift is known as a non-reciprocal phase shift. For-example, in a fiber optic current sensing coil affected by a magnetic field, where a first light wave, having a circular polarization state, travels in one direction in the coil and a second light wave having a circular polarization state travels in the opposite direction, there will be a phase shift between the two waves called non-reciprocal phase shift. The non-reciprocal phase shift experienced by a light wave will vary depending on whether the light wave is propagating in the same direction as the magnetic field or against the magnetic field. Measurements of the non-reciprocal phase shift may then be made to determine current or magnetic fields affecting the sensing coil.
Because the non-reciprocal phase shift occurs between light waves in a circular polarization state and because the light waves are initially in a linear polarization state, a method for converting the polarization state of a light wave is needed. To convert a light wave, e.g., vector E, having an x-axis component, Ex, and a y-axis component, Ey, from a linear polarization state to circular polarization state, the wave is passed through a highly birefringent medium. A birefringent medium is a medium that has two different indices of refraction, e.g., nx and ny. Each index of refraction corresponds to a different polarization axis where the axes are orthogonal to each other. For example, nx may correspond to an x-axis and ny may correspond to a y-axis. Because of the different refraction indices, Ex will travel at a different speed than Ey. Assuming that Ex and Ey enter the birefringent medium in phase with respect to one another, the phase difference between the components, Δφ, at the output of the birefringent medium is as follows:
where d is the length of the birefringent medium and λ is the wavelength of the light wave. Thus, the phase difference between an x-axis component and a y-axis component of a light wave traveling through a birefringent medium equals the difference between the indices of refraction multiplied by the length of the birefringent medium and divided by the wavelength of the light wave.
As shown in the formula, the change of polarization state is periodic through the birefringent medium. When the phase difference between Ex and Ey changes from 0 rad (0°C) to π/4 rad (90°C), the polarization state of E changes from linear to circular when Ex and Ey are equal in magnitude.
In addition, the change of polarization state is directly proportional to the length of the birefringent medium. With all other variables being constant, the length of the birefringent medium dictates the phase difference. The relationship between one wavelength of a given frequency of light and the length of the birefringent medium is referred to as the birefringence beat length, Λ where
Thus, the beat length equals the wavelength divided by the difference between the indices of refraction of the birefringent medium. In other words, the physical length corresponding to one beat length of a birefringent medium corresponds to 2 π of phase shift of the light passing through that medium.
One type of birefringent medium that is typically used is known as a quarter-wave plate. One of the effects of a quarter-wave plate is to change the polarization state of a light wave from a linear polarization state to a circular polarization state. The length of a quarter-wave plate is such that components of a light wave are 90°C out of phase with respect to one another upon exiting the quarter-wave plate. In particular, when a light wave is in a linear state of polarization being oriented at 45°C from its principal axes, i.e., having equal components on its principal axes, and is input into a quarter-wave plate, the output is the light wave in a circular state of polarization. In a quarter-wave plate, d can be determined as follows:
where m is an integer, including zero. Therefore, the length d of a birefringent quarter-wave plate is one quarter or three quarters of beat length Λ longer than an integral number of beat lengths.
Previously, other methods have been used to convert between linear polarization states and circular polarization states. One such method uses a bulk optic quarter-wave retarder. In the case of a bulk optic device or crystal, a linearly-polarized light wave travels from a first optical fiber through a lens to collimate the light wave. The light wave then travels through a bulk optic crystal having principal axes oriented orthogonally with respect to each other and oriented at 45°C with respect to the principal axes of the optical fiber. The wave then travels through a second lens and into a second optical fiber. This method is relatively costly, complex and its components occupy a relatively large amount of space. In addition, bulk optic devices are not reliable over time and temperature.
An alternate method includes the use of a single mode non-polarization maintaining fiber loop. The size and orientation of the loop converts a linear polarization state of a light wave into a circular polarization state. However, the single mode fiber loop may be hard to manipulate in achieving a desired orientation and its performance tends to degrade with temperature changes.
Thus, there is a need for a method which converts the polarization state of a light wave which eliminates or substantially reduces the disadvantages associated with prior methods.
A more complete understanding of the present invention may be derived by referring to the detailed description and claims when considered in connection with the Figures, wherein like reference numbers refer to like items throughout the Figures, and:
The present invention is useful in all optics applications in which a change of polarization state of a light wave is desirable. The present invention utilizes an all-fiber polarization retarder which uses a high birefringent polarization-maintaining fiber to retard the polarization of a component of a light wave, or in other words, to change the polarization state of a light wave. An all-fiber polarization retarder is advantageous over prior devices because it is smaller, simpler, less expensive and more reliable. For exemplary purposes, the present invention is being described in a fiber optic current sensor application. In a fiber optic current sensor, the present invention provides an inexpensive and simple method to change the polarization state of a light wave, thereby allowing current and magnetic fields experienced by a sensing coil to be measured as a result of the magneto-optic Faraday effect.
Light waves 114a and 114b then re-ravel part of the path from which they came. Light waves 114a and 114b interfere with each other at beam splitter 112 resulting in a light interference wave in accordance with well-known principles of optics. Some of the returning light interference wave is diverted by coupler 106 into detector 128. Detector 128 converts the light interference wave into the electrical domain where it can be analyzed to determine current, magnetic field strength, etc.
A phase shift between light waves 114a and 114b which is induced by a magnetic field will occur if light waves 114a and 114b are in circular polarization states. Thus, to enable the measurement of a phase shift between light waves 114a and 114b, they may need to be converted from a linear polarization state to a circular polarization state prior to entering coil 126. In a typical fiber optic current sensor, light waves 114a and 114b are linearly polarized by polarizer 110 as discussed above. The propagation of light waves 114a and 114b through retardation fibers 120a and 120b having a high birefringence converts the polarization state of light waves 114a and 114b. A high birefringent fiber has two dominant indices of refraction, suitably largely differing in value, which affect the propagation of a light wave through the fiber. The birefringent medium causes one component of the light wave to propagate more slowly, corresponding to the higher refractive index, than the other component of the light wave, corresponding to the lower refractive index.
An exemplary embodiment and method in accordance with the present invention are shown in
Beat length is the length of fiber which corresponds to one wavelength of retardation between two light waves, each traveling along a different polarization axis of the fiber. In a typical polarization-maintaining fiber, one millimeter corresponds to one wavelength of retardation. In general, the applications for the fiber are such that the goal is to minimize the length of the fiber to achieve a desired retardation. This corresponds to the difference, nx-ny, being as large as possible. However, in accordance with one aspect of the present invention, the retardation fiber suitably has an increased beat length so that a retardation fiber is more manageable to manipulate. A retardation fiber that has one wavelength of retardation per four or five millimeters of fiber is much easier to manipulate than a retardation fiber that has one wavelength of retardation over one millimeter of fiber. For example, assume it is desirable to retard a component of a light wave by 90°C, i.e., one-quarter of a wavelength. If a retardation fiber having a beat length of one millimeter was used, it would be necessary to cut the fiber to a length equal to one quarter of one millimeter. On the other hand, if a four millimeter beat length retardation fiber was used, it would be necessary to cut the fiber to a length equal to one millimeter, which is a much more manageable operation. A retardation fiber is suitably selected to be a length which is short enough to maintain its polarization-maintaining characteristics and long enough to make it practical to handle and cleave.
As discussed above, retardation fiber 304 is designed to convert polarization states of a light wave. As shown in
Polarized light is then again transmitted into input fiber 302 (step 408) and step 410 is repeated. If the polarization state of the emitted light is sufficiently close to circular, the method is complete (step 414). If the polarization state of the emitted light is not sufficiently close to circular, the retardation fiber 304 is again lapped with the abrasive substance (step 412). These steps are repeated until the desired result, i.e., a circular polarization state, is obtained. The cleaving and lapping steps need to be executed with extreme accuracy. If retardation fiber 304 is cleaved or lapped too short, a new retardation fiber may be necessary because the desired polarization state may no longer be obtained. Thus, precision is important in cleaving retardation fiber 304.
Once the desired polarization state is obtained, an output fiber 316 may then be joined to end 314 of retardation fiber 304 via a splice or some other suitable means. Typically, output fiber 316 is an end of a sensing coil. In addition, output fiber 316 suitably preserves circular polarization states.
In an alternate exemplary method 500 in accordance with the present invention, as shown in
In this exemplary method, the beat length of retardation fiber 204 is less critical than in other methods because the heating of retardation fiber 204 provides for a greater tolerance in the cleaved length of retardation fiber 204.
In an alternate exemplary method 600 in accordance with the present invention shown in
a) clamp the input fiber into a holding fixture,
b) cleave the input fiber a controlled distance, B, from the holding fixture,
c) splice the input and retardation fibers together, and
d) cleave the retardation fiber at a second distance, B+ΔB, from the holding fixture.
An alternate method for precise cleaving may be performed by the following steps:
a) clamp the input fiber into a holding fixture,
b) cleave the input fiber a controlled distance, B, from its holding fixture,
c) splice the input and retardation fibers together,
d) clamp the retardation fiber in a holding fixture,
e) release the clamp on the input fiber,
f) move the input fiber holding fixture the desired distance, d, closer to the retardation fiber holding fixture,
g) again clamp the input fiber into its holding fixture, and
h) cleave the retardation fiber at the controlled distance, B, from the input fiber holding fixture.
Polarized light is then transmitted into input fiber 202 (step 606). The output of retardation fiber 204 is transmitted into a polarization analyzer and detector to determine the polarization state of the light emitted from retardation fiber 204 (step 608). In this exemplary method, because the initial cleave of retardation fiber 204 occurs at a length so near the length which will yield the desired retardation, no additional modifications to the length of retardation fiber 204 are made.
Although the above exemplary methods are all oriented towards converting the polarization of light waves from linear to circular, the present invention is not so limited. The methods may be used to convert any polarization state to any other polarization state by the orientation of input fiber to retardation fiber, the length and beat length of retardation fiber and the techniques for adjusting the length of the retardation fiber. For example, if a desired retardation is 180°C or one-half of a wavelength, the above techniques can be used to achieve the desired retardation.
In addition, as stated above, the present invention is useful in all optics applications in which a change of polarization state of a light wave is desirable.
Irrespective of which method disclosed herein is used to convert the polarization state of a light wave, the splices may be rejacketed or packaged in a rigid housing as is known in the industry.
It will be understood that the foregoing description is of exemplary embodiments and methods of this invention and that this invention is not so limited. Various modifications may be made in the design, arrangement, and implementation of these embodiments and methods without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, as set forth in the claims below.
Sanders, Glen A., Shannon, John H., Fetting, Karl A., Goettsche, Randy P., Hawk, Tracy L.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
6703821, | Feb 28 2000 | KVH Industries, Inc | Faraday-effect current sensor with improved vibration response |
6707558, | Aug 02 2000 | KVH Industries, Inc | Decreasing the effects of linear birefringence in a fiber-optic sensor by use of Berry's topological phase |
6763153, | Apr 17 2002 | Emcore Corporation | Apparatus and method for electronic RIN reduction in fiber-optic sensors utilizing filter with group delay |
6836334, | Oct 31 2001 | KVH Industries, Inc | Angle random walk (ARW) noise reduction in fiber optic sensors using an optical amplifier |
6891622, | Feb 11 1999 | KVH Industries, Inc | Current sensor |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4465335, | |||
4674833, | Sep 18 1984 | Leetec Limited | Connectors for optical fibres |
4712004, | Aug 20 1986 | SIMMONDS PRECISION PRODUCTS, INC , A CORP OF NY | Method and apparatus for compensating fiber optic lead and connector losses in a fiber optic sensor by using a broadband optical source and multiple wave retardation |
4737005, | Dec 17 1982 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy | Method for eliminating birefringence in a fiber optic coupler and a coupler polarization corrector |
4979235, | Apr 17 1989 | Tektronix, Inc. | Polarization controller for use in optical fiber communication system |
5120130, | Apr 26 1983 | The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University | Apparatus and method for reducing phase errors in an interferometer |
5239362, | Dec 27 1988 | Hitachi Cable Limited | Fiber-optic rotation sensor |
5283847, | Sep 09 1991 | Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. | Method of manufacturing and evaluating an optical fiber coupler and apparatus therefor |
5377283, | May 29 1992 | Honeywell Inc. | Configuration control of mode coupling errors |
5408555, | May 19 1993 | Nortel Networks Limited | Polarization insensitive wavelength multiplexing 2×2 fibre couplers |
5417733, | Sep 01 1993 | Alignment system and method for splicing of polarization-maintaining single mode optical fiber | |
5457756, | Jul 10 1992 | LFK-Lenkflugkoerpersysteme GmbH | Fiber-optic depolarizer |
5587791, | Sep 27 1994 | Citeq | Optical interferometric current sensor and method using a single mode birefringent waveguide and a pseudo-depolarizer for measuring electrical current |
5644397, | Oct 07 1994 | The Texas A&M University System | Fiber optic interferometric circuit and magnetic field sensor |
5696858, | Aug 01 1996 | TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM, THE | Fiber Optics apparatus and method for accurate current sensing |
5727109, | Jan 21 1993 | JDS Uniphase Corporation | Optical attenuator with low polarization mode dispersion |
5771324, | May 03 1996 | CVI Laser, LLC | Polarization-preserving fiber optic assembly |
5887009, | May 22 1997 | OPTICAL BIOPSY TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Confocal optical scanning system employing a fiber laser |
6137924, | Sep 02 1998 | FURUKAWA ELECTRIC NORTH AMERICA, INC | Article comprising a dispersion compensating grating with low polarization mode dispersion |
DE4223740, | |||
EP522843, | |||
WO9853352, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Dec 29 1998 | NxtPhase Technologies, SRL | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jan 15 1999 | HAWK, TRACY L | Honeywell, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010110 | /0448 | |
Jan 18 1999 | SHANNON, JOHN H | Honeywell, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010110 | /0448 | |
Jan 19 1999 | SANDERS, GLEN A | Honeywell, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010110 | /0448 | |
Jan 21 1999 | GOETTSCHE, RANDY P | Honeywell, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010110 | /0448 | |
Jan 22 1999 | FETTING, KARL A | Honeywell, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010110 | /0448 | |
Feb 09 2000 | HONEYEWELL, INC A CORPORATION OF DELAWARE | NXTPHASE TECHNOLOGIES SRL A CORPORATION OF BARBADOS | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010735 | /0001 | |
Jun 26 2003 | NxtPhase Corporation | PERSUES 2000, LLC | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 013767 | /0628 | |
Jun 26 2003 | NxtPhase Technology SRL | NxtPhase Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 015810 | /0797 | |
Jun 26 2003 | NXTPHASE, INC | Perseus 2000, LLC | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 013774 | /0001 | |
Mar 24 2004 | NxtPhase Corporation | Perseus 2000, LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 015819 | /0803 | |
Apr 06 2004 | Perseus 2000, LLC | 4204077 CANADA LIMITED | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 015870 | /0930 | |
Aug 04 2004 | 4204077 CANADA LIMITED | NxtPhase T & D Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 015886 | /0931 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Oct 04 2006 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Mar 18 2007 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Mar 18 2006 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Sep 18 2006 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 18 2007 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Mar 18 2009 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Mar 18 2010 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Sep 18 2010 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 18 2011 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Mar 18 2013 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Mar 18 2014 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Sep 18 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 18 2015 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Mar 18 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |