An apparatus and method for maintaining a minimum amount of ink in an ink fountain (10) of a printing press includes an ink fountain level sensor (28) and ink dispenser (26) mounted on a carriage (30) for lateral movement on a track (32) across the ink fountain. The carriage traverses the ink fountain. When the ink in the fountain develops a spot below a preset minimum level, a preset amount of ink is immediately dispensed upon detection of the low spot by the sensor.
|
6. A method for maintaining a desired level of ink in an ink fountain of an offset printing press comprising:
providing an ink fountain including a fountain roller and blade for holding a supply of viscous, offset printing ink, said ink fountain is adapted to cooperate with an ink train for delivering a film of ink to a printing plate; laterally traversing above said ink fountain a sensor for sensing the level of ink in said ink fountain, wherein said sensor moves in tandem with an ink dispenser, and wherein said sensor measures the distance between said sensor and the surface of ink in said ink fountain without contacting the ink; receiving samples of the ink level as the sensor laterally traverses the ink fountain, wherein said samples are taken at discrete intervals along at least one segment of said ink fountain; and dispensing ink through an outlet of said ink dispenser when said samples from the ink level sensor indicate a low ink level within said at least one segment.
1. A rotary printing press comprising:
an ink fountain including a fountain roller and blade for holding a small supply of viscous, offset printing ink, the ink fountain adapted to cooperate with an ink train for delivering a film of ink to a printing plate; a sensor for sensing the level of ink in the ink fountain, wherein said sensor measures the distance between the sensor and the surface of ink in the ink fountain without contacting the ink; an ink dispenser for selectively dispensing ink through an outlet of said ink dispenser and into said ink fountain; a structure for moving the sensor and said ink dispenser outlet together in tandem along a support mounted above the ink fountain; and a controller in communication with said ink dispenser, wherein said controller receives samples of the ink level in said ink fountain from the ink level sensor, wherein said samples are taken at discrete intervals along the ink fountain, and wherein said controller determines whether ink from the ink dispenser should be dispensed into the ink fountain based at least in part on said received samples.
2. The rotary printing press of
3. The rotary printing press of
4. The rotary printing press of
5. The rotary printing press of
7. The method of
8. The method of
|
This application is a continuation of pending U.S. application Ser. No. 09/814,380 filed Mar. 21, 2001; now U.S. Pat. No. 6,401,612 which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/225,429 filed Jan. 5, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,397,745 issued Jun. 4, 2002; which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/891,587 filed Jun. 20, 1997, now abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/723,693 filed Sep. 30, 1996, now abandoned, which application is incorporated herein for all purposes by reference.
The invention pertains generally to the field of printing presses and, more particularly, to ink fountains for printing presses.
In rotary offset printing presses, a thin film of ink is continuously applied to a printing plate on which has been formed an ink receptive image. The thin film of ink tends to adhere only to the image portion of the plate. The plate is carried on a rotating cylinder or drum. The printing plate rolls the image directly on a printing substrate (e.g. paper or mylar) or on an impression blanket cylinder, which in turn rolls it onto paper. Paper is fed along a transport in either discrete sheets or a continuous web.
The ink film applied to the printing plate must be of uniform thickness and continuous for printing an image of consistent quality on the paper. To create and deliver this thin film of ink, a train of rollers takes ink from a reservoir called an ink fountain and, during transport of ink from one roller to the next, smooths it into the continuous and uniform thin film. The ink is metered from the fountain to the ink train at a rate which is sufficient to maintain uniformity and continuity in the film. Most ink is metered from fountains using a similar method. An end of a substantially flat plate, called a blade, is placed under and to one side of a rotating roller, called a fountain roller. The blade is angled upwardly to trap the ink against the fountain roller. Cheeks on opposite sides of the blade and roller create, with the blade and the fountain roller, the ink reservoir. The blade is positioned so that, as it engages the fountain roller, a narrow gap is formed between it and the roller. The fountain roller rotates toward the blade, taking with it a film of ink adhering to its surface. The size of the gap between the roller and the blade determines the amount or thickness of the film which is carried by the fountain roller and delivered to the ink train via, typically, a ducting roller. The position of the edge of the blade with respect to the fountain roller is adjustable to change the metering rate. As consumption rates usually varies across the fountain due variations in the image being printed, the metering edge of most blades is flexible so that ink can be metered at different rates along its width. A row of screws or adjustable pins, called keys, are used to slightly bend or pressure the edge at discrete locations and thereby contour the edge of the blade and vary the gap or pressure between the blade and fountain roller. Each key can be used to adjust metering along a predefined interval or segment of the blade.
Printing ink is a oily, viscous substance. It is tacky so that it will properly adhere to the image areas on the printing plate. For example, ink used to print newspapers is the least viscous, usually in the range of 50 to 80 poise. Ink for letter presses and heat-set inks employed for web offset printing have viscosities in the range of about 150 to 200 poise. Inks for sheet fed, lithographic offset printing presses are the most viscous, usually in the range of 250 to 300 poise. Newer "waterless" inks, which eliminate the need for conventional dampening systems to apply a thin film of water to the non-image areas of the printing plate, are highly viscous, gel-like substances which do not flow. Due to printing ink's viscous nature and tendency to stick to surfaces in the ink fountain, the ink will tend not to flow easily to low spots, especially when the level of the ink in the fountain is low or the printing ink is of the very viscous type used in sheet fed, lithographic offset presses. The ink level in the fountain can develop low spots, especially as the overall level of ink in the fountain drops. A low spot will lead to a thinning of the supply of film to the ink train, which in turn may result in a film which is not uniform or is discontinuous being delivered to the printing plate, resulting in poor quality prints.
In smaller and mid-size offset presses, especially sheet fed offset presses, a pressman manually scoops ink out of a can and spreads it along the width of the ink fountain in a thick layer at the commencement of a run. Pressmen will naturally tend to put more than enough ink in the fountain for the job to guard against development of low spots which could result in wasted prints of inferior quality. Consequently, it is not unusual for a substantial amount of ink leftover in the ink fountain at the end of a run. This ink is almost always discarded. It may be specially mixed for the particular job and it tends to quickly oxidize. A portion of ink in the fountain is exposed to air and will have already begun to oxidize, even if agitated or stirred in the ink fountain to reduce the effects of oxidation.
By some estimates, as much as seventy percent (70%) of ink used in printing is discarded. Discarded ink imposes a substantial cost on printing in two ways. First, printing ink is expensive and constitutes a large portion of the total cost of a printing job. Second, printing ink is a hazardous substance and is environmentally harmful. Disposal of discarded ink in an environmentally sensitive way is expensive and, in many places, mandated by government regulations.
Automatic systems have been used for replenishing ink in ink fountains on large printing presses, especially newspaper and other large web printing presses which consume large quantities of lower viscosity ink. These systems operate to maintain a predetermined quantity of ink in the system by measuring the level of the ink in the ink fountain and opening a valve to pump ink into the fountain from an external drum or supply when the ink drops below a preset level. Several techniques have been used in such apparatus to sense the level of ink, including floats, tactile or mechanical sensors, pneumatic sensors, capacitive sensors and ultrasonic sensors. Generally, sensors which require physical contact with the ink have been unreliable due, at least in part, to the viscosity of the ink. The invasiveness of such sensors may also interfere with the metering function of the fountain. Ultrasonic transducers which determine distance using conventional ranging methods are beset by a number of problems commonly associated with acoustic ranging equipment. Acoustic signals are sensitive to air disturbances which may deflect or reflect the signal. They are also sensitive to ambient temperature fluctuations which alter the velocity of the acoustic waves. Air disturbances and temperature fluctuations may be caused, for example, the heat given off by the printing press and other environmental influences. Disturbances in the surface of the ink caused by, among other things, mechanical agitators used to stir the ink also cause inaccurate readings. Acoustic signals will also tend to resonate or ring if the distance between the sensor and the surface of the ink is small, making timing of the return signal difficult and unreliable.
The objective of such systems is not to avoid discarding ink, however. In large runs, the amount left over in the ink fountain is not likely to be a large percentage of the amount of ink dispensed from a bulk supply. Rather, it is supplying large quantities of ink to reservoirs of limited capacity for large printing runs. Such automatic system will tend to maintain a maximum amount of ink in an ink fountain in order to avoid any risk of ink starvation. Such apparatus do not address the special problems of maintaining only a minimum level of ink in the ink fountains, especially when such ink is highly viscous.
The invention provides for an apparatus and method for automatically maintaining a minimum level of ink in an ink fountain and thereby avoid wastage, especially when using ink which is viscous or does not flow well. The preferred embodiment of the invention has a number of different aspects, which, singly or in combination with one or more of the other aspects, give it advantages over the prior art, especially when used on printing presses running smaller jobs and/or use using particularly viscous ink. Several of these aspects and their advantages are summarized below.
According to one aspect, an ink fountain level sensor is mounted for lateral movement across the ink fountain. It moves across the ink fountain, measuring the level of ink along the width of the fountain. When a low ink level is detected, an ink dispenser deposits additional ink into the fountain. A lower level of ink within the fountain can be set, especially when using highly viscous ink, as the sensor will be able to guard against low spots developing which would result in ink starvation.
According to another aspect, an ink dispenser is mounted for lateral movement across the ink fountain. Ink may thereby be delivered immediately and directly to low spots, if and when they develop. It effectively is delivered directly to the sections of the ink fountain consuming most of the ink. As the ink need not flow from a fixed dispense location, a lower level of ink can be maintained in the fountain and consumption demands for different portions of the fountain met. In combination with an ink fountain level sensor scanning the ink level, the dispenser may be directed to the low spot. When mounted for movement with the ink fountain level sensor, the dispenser may remedy the low level soon after detection.
Furthermore, and according to another aspect, an ink dispenser deposits ink on a fountain roller. The roller carries the ink toward, and forces it into, the narrow convergence between the fountain roller and the blade in the ink fountain. Thus, a large head of ink need not be maintained to push it toward the metering gap between the blade and fountain roller of a conventional ink fountain. Indeed, a small bead of ink may be maintained in the gap when the ink dispenser traverses the fountain and deposits small amounts of ink as needed to maintain the bead.
According to another aspect, ink level in an ink fountain is sensed using a photoelectric proximity sensor which reflects an optical beam off of surfaces. The beam may be aimed such that it determines whether there is ink between it and a certain predetermined distance and determines whether the ink level is low based on where the reflected beam hits an optical detector. The beam can be focused or aimed at a small areas. It tends not to be subject to ambient disturbances which affect ultrasonic waves. The method of measuring offers a high resolution and accuracy. When traversed across the ink fountain, it is well suited for detecting low spots in the ink, especially when the ink is maintained as a bead of narrow cross-section in the convergence between a fountain roller and a blade. It also has advantages over the prior art. For example, ultrasonic waves used in ultrasonic sensors tend to spread. Thus, they tend not to have sufficient resolution to discriminate between the ink fountain and a minimum ink level in the ink fountain, especially a small bead nestled between a blade and fountain roller. It is also difficult to use capacitive or inductive sensors in such situations since they will tend to give erroneous readings when positioned too close to metal in the ink fountain.
Finally, irregularities in the surface of ink in an ink fountain cause unpredictable deflections in an optical beam transmitted by an photoelectric proximity sensor traversing the length of the fountain. Such deflections result in false readings: sometimes the beams reflection is such that it appears that the ink level is closer than it actually is; sometimes the reflection indicates that the ink level is farther than it actually is. To better assure that the level of ink is maintained at a preset level, the ink fountain level sensor is, according to another aspect of an embodiment of the invention, sampled multiple times over a predefined segment or interval. Ink is dispensed when a predefined percentage of samples taken within the segment indicates a low ink level; or, conversely, ink is not dispensed when a predefined percentage of samples indicates that the ink is above a preset level. Although the samples can be taken over a series of fixed, end-to-end segments, the calculation is preferably done on a segment moving with the ink fountain level sensor. In effect, it is a moving window of the last number of samples constantly moving, in effect, a single segment. A running percentage is calculated by taking the value of next sample and dropping the value of last sample, and determining the percentage of samples indicating that either the ink in the fountain is low or high. This moving window avoids the possibility of a low spot developing at a boundary between otherwise fixed segments.
The forgoing summary is intended only to aid in the understanding of advantages of various aspects of the preferred embodiments exemplifying the invention and not to limit the scope of the invention as set forth by the appended claims. The invention, as claimed, may have other or additional advantages which will be apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiment made in reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
In the following description, like numbers refer to like parts unless the context indicates otherwise.
Referring generally to
Mounted on frame 11, above the ink fountain, is an ink management system for maintaining a minimum level of ink in the ink fountain, including a linear transport generally designated as 24, an ink dispenser 26 and an ink fountain level sensor 28. The linear transport moves the ink dispenser and the ink fountain level sensor across the width of the ink fountain. The linear transport which is illustrated includes a carriage 30 to which is mounted the ink dispenser 26 and ink fountain level sensor 28. An actuator moves and positions the carriage along track or rail 32 extending over and across the ink fountain. Any type of linear transport which can move the ink dispenser and the ink fountain level sensor across the ink fountain could be used.
The ink management system can be integrated into the printing press as original equipment. However, for purposes of demonstrating the adaptability of the ink management system to being retrofitted to the ink fountain 10, track 32 is shown attached or mounted to the top of frame 11 of the printing press by means of fasteners 34 which are bolted or secured to the top of each side of the frame and hooked into a slot on the track. If desired, the same track, as well as the same carriage, ink dispenser and ink level sensor, could be retrofitted to different types of printing presses of generally the same size with little need to specially adapt them. For this purpose, fasteners 34 may be positioned at least at several points along the length of the track so that they can be aligned with the frame 11 of the printing press. Each fastener 34 has a tongue which cooperates with a slot formed along at least each end portion of the track 32 to enable the fasteners to be hooked to the rail at any position along the slot and thus aligned with the sides of frame 11.
The actuator which moves the carriage 30 on the track 32 includes a motor 36 for powering a drive for moving and positioning carriage 30 on the track. The drive includes a screw 38 of fixed pitch which cooperates with a threaded portion of the carriage 30 to move and position the carriage linearly along the track. The motor is an electric step motor which turns the screw in fixed steps or increments of angle to precisely control rotation of the screw and, thus, positioning of the carriage. If desired, a servo mechanism could be used to control positioning of the carriage rather than a step motor. Other types of actuators could be used to position the carriage of the track. For example, the motor could be hydraulic or pneumatic rather than electric. The drive may be some other type of mechanical drive, for example a belt, cable or chain, or a pneumatic or hydraulic drive.
The linear transport, ink dispenser 26 and ink fountain level sensor 28 are oriented with respect to the ink fountain 10 such that the nozzle 40 of the ink dispenser traverses or moves laterally across the width of the ink fountain above the fountain roller 20 and the ink fountain level sensor traverses the ink fountain above the ink 18 in the reservoir 16. This traversing is indicated by the carriage, ink dispenser and ink fountain level sensor outlined in dashed lines in a second position laterally displaced from the position in which they are illustrated using solid lines. The ink dispenser is mounted on the carriage using arm 42 so that the linear transport can be located in a position which does not interfere with dispensing operations. The ink fountain level sensor 28 is mounted on an arm 43 which extends outwardly over the in fountain, but to one side of the ink dispenser. As the carriage traverses during sensing and dispensing operations, the ink fountain level sensor leads the ink dispenser. If the ink fountain level sensor 28 senses a low spot, the ink dispenser, once it moves over the low spot, dispenses a predetermined amount of ink.
As the nozzle 40 is located over the fountain roller 12, ink which is dispensed falls onto the fountain roller and is then carried by the fountain roller towards the metering gap between the blade 14 and fountain roller 12. The fountain roller effectively forces the ink into the area of convergence between the blade 14 and the fountain roller 12, thus helping to ensure that enough ink is present at the metering gap to provide a continuous and uniform supply of ink. As there is no reliance on flowing of ink, the level of ink in the fountain may be kept very low and/or very viscous ink may be used. Preferably, the amount of ink which is dispensed is such that a small bead of ink, as shown in
In operation, the width of the ink fountain can be logically divided into segments or increments for purposes of level sensing and dispensing of ink. The segments could, if desired, correspond to the segments of the blade 14 controlled by each of the keys 15. The level or amount of the ink in the segment is then determined by averaging or integrating a series of readings taken across the segment. The ink dispenser, once it is centered over the segment, dispenses the ink if the level is below a present level or amount.
Two embodiments of ink dispenser 26 are disclosed, one in
Referring now only to
Referring to
Referring briefly to
Referring now to
At decision step 84, the controller 62 checks the signals from the ink fountain level sensor 28. If the sensor indicates that the ink level is below a predetermined ink level, the location or position of the low spot is noted, stored or remembered at step 85, by setting a flag, recording in memory a numerical position, or some other method, and the ink dispenser 26 and the ink fountain level sensor 28 are moved laterally across the ink fountain by the controller causing actuation of the lateral movement actuator 72. In the illustrated embodiment, this movement is accomplished in the disclosed embodiment by the controller stepping the step motor 36 (
At step 87, the controller determines whether the ink dispenser is over a location of a low spot in the ink in the ink fountain. If it is, then ink is dispensed at step 88. To dispense ink, the controller 62 causes ink dispense actuator 70 to dispense ink from the ink dispenser 26 and into the ink fountain. In the embodiment shown in
If the run/stop switch 64 is still on run at step 94, the controller then determines at decision step 96 whether carriage 30 for the ink dispenser and ink fountain level sensor is at the edge of the ink fountain, particularly whether it is at the end of the track 32 of the linear transport. If so, the controller causes the lateral movement actuator 72 to return, at step 98, the cartridge to the beginning side, and the process returns to step 76 to continue. Otherwise, the process loops back to step 84. If, at step 94, the pressman has stopped the ink management system by switching run/stop switch to stop, the process skips to step 98.
As previously indicated, the width of the ink fountain can be logically divided into a series of segments or intervals for purposes of measuring ink levels and dispensing ink. These segments may be aligned with the keys 15 (
The controller can be adjusted to set the amount of ink which is dispensed at step 88 at a fixed amount. The amount is set based, in part, on trial and error. A minimum desirable ink level should be determined. The minimum desirable level should be at or above the level which, at a maximum rate of consumption, there is minimum acceptable risk of ink starvation developing during the time it takes the ink dispenser 26 is to complete a full cycle across the ink fountain. The preset amount of ink which is dispensed should be sufficient to bring the ink level at least to the minimum desirable level during one dispense cycle. Alternately, the controller could determine the amount of ink to be dispensed into a segment to bring it within a desirable range depending on the level or amount of ink determined for that segment.
Referring now to
Referring now to
The ink dispenser 26 includes, in this embodiment, a pneumatic head (not visible) supported by a frame 124. The pneumatic head acts as an actuator to push ink from ink cartridge 46. Frame 124 allows ink cartridge 46 to be positioned below the pneumatic head and held in place.
Compressed air for driving the pneumatic linear actuator 120 and the pneumatic head of the ink dispenser is generated by air compressor 128. Compressed air flows through supply hose 132 to pneumatic circuits (not shown). The pneumatic circuit is operated by a process controller (not shown). The pneumatic circuits include solenoid-controlled valves, flow control valves and pressure regulating valves arranged in a conventional manner to supply compressed air to the linear actuator through hoses 134 and 136 so that the carriage may be moved in either direction along its track at predetermined rates and for predetermined distances. The pneumatic circuit also connects compressed air to the pneumatic head through hose 138 to cause a predetermined amount of ink to be dispensed from the ink cartridge 46. The valves for the pneumatic circuits are located within the housing 130, together with power supplies for the solenoid operated valves, and process controller and other electrical systems.
Proximity switches 142 and 144 are tripped when carriage 126 has reached its end of travel at one end the linear actuator 120, opposite control panel 140 and its home position next to the control panel, respectively. Control panel 140 includes buttons 146 to change modes of operation of the ink management system and to control manually the position of, and dispensing from, the ink dispenser when the ink management system is in a manual mode. Display 148 visually indicates the mode of operation, ink usage and is located within control panel 140. The process controller supplants buttons 64 and 66 in
Referring now to
Referring to
No particular form, layout or arrangement of the microprocessor and its interface with the memory and the other external devices is intended to be implied by the schematic illustration. There is no limit on the type of general purpose microprocessor systems and software to operate the ink management system according to the processes described below in connection with
Communications device 178 enables data on, for example, ink consumption and the amount of ink remaining in cartridge, be sent to another computer or device. It allows the controller to receive commands, new programming or diagnostic evaluation. Furthermore, in a multi-color press, each ink fountain could be connected to a central computer in daisy-chain fashion, as indicated in
The operation of the ink management system and ink dispensing processes are illustrated by the flow charts of
Referring to
The ink management system may have several modes of operation, including "manual," "home," "fill" and "auto." The mode of operation selected by a pressman determines which processes the ink management system performs. If "manual" button 194 is pressed on the control panel, the process illustrated in
Referring to
To manually cause ink to be dispensed from the ink cartridge, a pressman depresses "arrow down" button 230. As indicated by decision step 231, this results in the ink dispenser 26 feeding ink at a predetermined rate at step 232. At decision step 234, the ultra-sonic range finder is checked. If it indicates that ink cartridge is low, the display 148 is updated with the new level and a yellow warning light 236 on the control panel 140 (
Referring to
Referring to
Referring now to
Referring back to
Referring now to
Turning to decision step 282 of the illustrated flow diagram, so long as the ink dispenser has not reached the end of travel on the linear transport, the ink dispenser 26 and fountain level sensor (
At step 290, a decision is made as to weather the ink level in the ink fountain is too low. This is determined if the calculated percentage of negative readings over the segment or window is greater than a predetermined percentage, or if the percentage positive readings is less than a predetermined percentage. These predetermined percentages are figures of merit determined empirically based on the type of ink used, as well as the ink level which is set, the rate at which the ink dispenser dispense and other factors which may effect the degree of risk that, if ink is not dispensed, ink starvation may occur.
If, at step 290, ink is to be dispensed, then the process proceeds to step 256 of the ink feed cycle illustrated in FIG. 15 and described above. At step 264 of the ink feed cycle, the process returns to step 282 of
The forgoing description is of a preferred embodiment of the invention and is intended only to illustrate rather than define the invention. Modifications, substitutions and rearrangements of the forgoing embodiment may be made without departing from the scope of the invention defined by the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
7017492, | Mar 10 2003 | Baldwin Americas Corporation | Coordinating the functioning of a color control system and a defect detection system for a printing press |
7033004, | Nov 07 2002 | T.G.C. S.r.l. | Device for feeding prepackaged ink to the ink duct of printing machines |
7102770, | Jun 13 2001 | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY L P | System and methods for smoothing sensed toner levels |
8302532, | Mar 29 2005 | I MAR PLANNING INC | Printing machine |
8708439, | Dec 06 2007 | X-Rite Switzerland GmbH | Language and method for measuring the viscosity of printing ink during the printing and ink correction process |
8870316, | Dec 06 2007 | X-Rite Switzerland GmbH | Language and method for measuring the viscosity of printing ink during the printing and ink correction process |
8955437, | Mar 29 2005 | I MAR PLANNING INC | Printing machine |
9358777, | Dec 06 2007 | X-Rite Switzerland GmbH | Language and method for measuring the viscosity of printing ink during the printing and ink correction process |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3145567, | |||
3199451, | |||
3292534, | |||
3354823, | |||
3590736, | |||
3667500, | |||
3710714, | |||
3730089, | |||
3780651, | |||
3788220, | |||
3848529, | |||
3885496, | |||
4010683, | Feb 19 1974 | Societe Seveg Etudes Equipments Graphiques | Liquid level control |
4043265, | Jan 29 1976 | Molins Macine Company, Inc. | Ink level warning system |
4088074, | May 09 1972 | Apparatus for inking printing plates | |
4092922, | Jul 25 1975 | Addressograph-Multigraph Corporation | Lithographic ink supply |
4099461, | Nov 09 1972 | Mitter & Co. | Control device for controlling the level of a liquid in a container |
4108068, | Feb 12 1974 | Seveg, S.A. | Ink agitator |
4116128, | May 14 1976 | Mathias Bauerle GmbH | Device for controlling a washing liquid level in a wash tank of a printing machine |
4130126, | May 31 1977 | IBM INFORMATION PRODUCTS CORPORATION, 55 RAILROAD AVENUE, GREENWICH, CT 06830 A CORP OF DE | Ink maintenance sensor |
4287828, | Mar 21 1977 | Ink metering apparatus | |
4290362, | Dec 23 1978 | M.A.N.-Roland Druckmaschinen Aktiengesellschaft | Inking system for a printing machine, particularly of the offset or gravure type |
4342042, | Dec 19 1980 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Ink supply system for an array of ink jet heads |
4358996, | Aug 28 1973 | CHAMBON LIMITED | Rotary offset printing press |
4378735, | May 14 1981 | Baldwin Gegenheimer Corporation | Antilinting device for ink fountains |
4384523, | Oct 23 1980 | Mirachem Corporation | Fountain control system |
4392426, | Apr 15 1980 | Veb Kombinat Polygraph "Werner Lamberz" Leipzig | Ink-applying arrangement |
4401031, | Dec 28 1981 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Disposable self contained ink cartridge for value printing device |
4422084, | Nov 06 1979 | Epson Corporation; Kabushiki Kaisha Suwa Seikosha | Fluid tank and device for detecting remaining fluid |
4453467, | May 16 1980 | Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG | Ink metering device in an ink duct for offset or letterpress printing machines |
4461210, | Nov 05 1981 | Baldwin-Gegenheimer Corporation | Wedge shaped ink agitator for printing presses |
4479433, | Mar 21 1978 | Baldwin-Gegenheimer Corporation | Ink level control |
4481883, | Jun 04 1982 | Creusot-Loire | Low-blade inking mechanism with detachable ink duct troughs |
4535693, | Sep 08 1982 | G.D. Societa per Azioni | Device for dispensing viscous materials |
4542652, | Mar 30 1982 | Method and apparatus for determining a relative distance in a cylinder and piston assembly | |
4543649, | Oct 17 1983 | COMMERCIAL INTERTECH CORP A CORPORATION OF OH | System for ultrasonically detecting the relative position of a moveable device |
4604633, | Dec 08 1982 | KONISHIROKU PHOTO INDUSTRY CO , LTD , A CORP OF JAPAN | Ink-jet recording apparatus |
4709633, | Apr 13 1987 | RCA LICENSING CORPORATION, TWO INDEPENDENCE WAY, PRINCETON, NJ 08540, A CORP OF DE | Circuit for controlling the ink level of an intaglio printing device |
4764671, | Oct 03 1986 | KOLLMORGEN CORPORATION | Fiber optic fluid sensor using coated sensor tip |
4781066, | Aug 22 1986 | Gilbarco Inc | Linear sensing apparatus for positive displacement meter |
4787313, | Apr 29 1986 | DIDDE WEB PRESS CORPORATION A CORPORATION OF KANSAS | Printing press using shiftable inking means |
4852604, | Oct 30 1985 | LOGIC ASSOCIATES INC | Ink monitor system |
4926693, | Jun 03 1988 | University of Hawaii | Contactless actuator piston proximity sensor |
4930416, | Mar 02 1988 | Kabushiki Kaisha Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho | Apparatus for quickly discharging ink from ink supply device |
4938054, | May 03 1989 | Gilbarco Inc | Ultrasonic linear meter sensor for positive displacement meter |
4977413, | Apr 15 1987 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Ink remain detector having a flexible member and a liquid injection recording apparatus utilizing the detector |
4978042, | Apr 17 1989 | Ink feeder for a lithographic press | |
5076767, | Dec 18 1989 | Master Flo Technology Inc. | Liquid flow metering |
5103728, | May 29 1990 | Baldwin Technology Corporation | Ink level control system for offset printing presses |
5136309, | Mar 19 1986 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Liquid injection apparatus with residual ink quantity detecting means |
5267793, | Feb 27 1991 | J & C Moores Ltd. | Ink agitating apparatus having a flexible blade which twists during lateral reciprocation |
5280750, | May 11 1989 | Kabushiki Kaisha Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho | Ink fountain apparatus |
5299290, | Feb 14 1992 | Calcomp Inc. | Ink sensing system for vector plotters |
5357864, | Mar 09 1990 | Kabushikigaisha Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho | Offset printing apparatus with ink storage device |
5398847, | May 18 1992 | Riso Kagaku Corporation | Cylinder/piston type fluid container |
5410960, | Aug 20 1990 | TAPHORN, JOSEPH B | Ink vibrator |
5427136, | Nov 27 1991 | SUN SOURCE 1 LLC | Fluid level detection system |
5454314, | Jul 27 1992 | Koenig & Bauer Aktiengesellschaft | Apparatus for emptying ink ducts |
5479193, | Sep 27 1990 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Device for detecting when a particular amount of ink remains in an ink jet recording apparatus and recording apparatus using the same |
5724890, | Apr 05 1995 | Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Aktiengesellschaft | Printing press |
5799578, | Apr 15 1994 | Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Aktiengesellschaft | Printing press and liquid supply |
5878667, | Jun 10 1997 | WALTER STOBB ASSOCIATES, INC | Method and apparatus for dispensing ink to a printing press |
5890431, | Sep 12 1996 | Koenig & Bauer-Albert Aktiengesellschaft | Ink supply device |
5977778, | Nov 27 1996 | CNH America LLC; BLUE LEAF I P , INC | Method and apparatus for sensing piston position |
6085652, | Jan 10 1997 | Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG | Ink fountain with a fountain roller in the inking mechanism of printing presses |
6401612, | Sep 30 1996 | Accel Graphic Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for maintaining ink level in ink fountain of printing press |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Sep 27 1996 | TANJA DESIGN CORPORATION | ACCEL GRAPHIC SYSTEMS, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 013828 | /0586 | |
Sep 27 1996 | KOEHLER, JAMES E | TANJA DESIGN CORPORATION | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 013828 | /0604 | |
Jun 10 2002 | Accel Graphic Systems, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Feb 03 2006 | ACCEL GRAPHIC SYSTEMS, INC | OFS AGENCY SERVICES, INC | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 017145 | /0505 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Dec 13 2006 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Oct 25 2010 | LTOS: Pat Holder Claims Small Entity Status. |
Nov 02 2010 | M2552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Yr, Small Entity. |
Mar 16 2015 | M2553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Yr, Small Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Sep 16 2006 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Mar 16 2007 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 16 2007 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Sep 16 2009 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Sep 16 2010 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Mar 16 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 16 2011 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Sep 16 2013 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Sep 16 2014 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Mar 16 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 16 2015 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Sep 16 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |