A method for guiding an intercepting missile to a body-to-body contact with an airborne target in the atmosphere. The method includes the steps of guiding the intercepting missile to within an appropriate distance from the airborne target, illuminating the airborne target, using an illuminator carried by the intercepting missile, acquiring an image of the illuminated airborne target and, steering the missile in accordance with an aimpoint on the image.
|
41. A hit to kill airborne target intercepting missile operating in the atmosphere comprising:
(a) a primary guidance system to guide the intercepting missile to within an appropriate distance from an airborne target and, (b) an active imagery guidance system to guide the intercepting missile to a body-to-body contact with said airborne target.
64. A hit to kill airborne target intercepting missile system operating in the atmosphere comprising:
(a) a launching sub system to launch the intercepting missile; (b) a primary guidance system to guide the intercepting missile to within an appropriate distance from an airborne target and, (c) an active imagery guidance system to guide the intercepting missile to a body-to-body contact with said airborne target.
25. An active imagery guidance system mounted on an intercepting missile for guiding the intercepting missile to a body-to-body contact with an airborne target in the atmosphere, the system comprising:
(a) an active imagery system to acquire an image of the airborne target; (b) a mechanism to calculate an aimpoint on said image and, (c) a steering mechanism to steer said intercepting missile in accordance with said aimpoint.
1. A method for guiding an intercepting missile to a body-to-body contact with an airborne target in the atmosphere, the method comprising the steps of:
(a) guiding the intercepting missile to within an appropriate distance from the airborne target; (b) illuminating the airborne target, using an illuminator carried by the intercepting missile; (c) acquiring an image of said illuminated airborne target and, (d) steering said missile in accordance with an aimpoint on said image.
2. The method as in
(e) launching said intercepting missile from a launcher selected from the group consisting of an aircraft launcher, a sea vehicle launcher and a ground stationed launcher.
3. The method as in
5. The method as in
6. The method as in
7. The method as in
8. The method as in
9. The method as in
(e) transferring guidance control of said intercepting missile from said primary guidance system to said laser radar slaved steering system.
10. The method as in
11. The method as in
12. The method as in
13. The method as in
14. The method as in
15. The method as in
16. The method as in
17. The method as in
19. The method as in
20. The method as in
22. The method as in
23. The method as in
( (f) detonating said warhead when the body-to-body contact occurs.
24. The method as in
(e) resetting said predetermined activation distance of said proximity fuse to zero.
26. The active imagery guidance system as in
(i) an illuminator to illuminate the airborne target; (ii) a focal plane detector array to collect reflected illumination from the airborne target and, (iii) a processor to construct said image according to an output of said focal plane detector array.
33. The system as in
34. The active imagery system as in
35. The active imagery system as in
36. The active imagery system as in
37. The active imagery system as in
38. The active imagery system as in
39. The active imagery system as in
40. The active imagery system as in
42. The intercepting missile as in
43. The intercepting missile as in
44. The intercepting missile as in
45. The intercepting missile as in
(I) an active imagery system to acquire an image of an airborne target; (II) a mechanism to calculate an aimpoint on said image and, (III) a steering mechanism to steer said intercepting missile in accordance with said aimpoint.
46. The intercepting missile as in
(i) an illuminator to illuminate said airborne target; (ii) a focal plane detector array to collect reflected illumination from said airborne target and, (iii) a processor to construct an image according to an output of said focal plane detector array.
53. The intercepting missile as in
54. The intercepting missile as in
55. The intercepting missile as in
56. The intercepting missile as in
57. The intercepting missile as in
58. The intercepting missile as in
59. The intercepting missile as in
60. The intercepting missile as in
61. The intercepting missile as in
(c) a mechanism for transferring guidance control of a flight path of the intercepting missile from said primary guidance system to said active imagery guidance system.
62. The intercepting missile as in
(c) a mechanism for deactivating said proximity fuse and, (d) a mechanism for detonating said warhead when a body-to-body contact is formed between said intercepting missile and said airborne target.
63. The intercepting missile as in
(c) a mechanism for resetting said predetermined activation distance of said proximity fuse to zero.
65. The intercepting missile system as in
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
The present invention relates to a target acquiring mechanism of intercepting missiles in general and to their last stage of homing on target in particular.
It is known that most hit attempts of intercepting missiles did not end in a direct hit on target. This is so for mainly two reasons: Firstly the intercepting missile may be diverted from its flight path to target by decoy countermeasures which are deployed by the target (such as flares for infra-red seeking missiles or chaff for missiles equipped with radar), or as a result of artifacts such as sunlight reflection in case of an infra red seekers and spurious RF echo signals in the case of missiles equipped with radar.
Secondly; even in apparently favorable situations in which the missile is heading toward a valid target, present guiding mechanisms of both infra-red and radar seeker missiles can not handle unexpected fast angular changes between the momentarily missile heading direction and the direction to target which result whenever the latter performs an emergency-breaking maneuver.
For a specific example of missile's equipped with infrared seeking sensors the process of updating the missile's flight path is as follows:
At the time after missile launching the sensor is directed substantially towards the target so that an infrared radiating "hot" spot of the target is located at, or near, the center of its field of view. As the target moves away from the center of the field of view of the missile's sensor so that the missile's flight path correspondingly moves off target, the sensor rotates independently of the missile's body to bring the target's infrared radiating hot spot back into the center of its field of view. A signal representative of the spatial rotation angle through which the sensor rotated during this maneuver is transmitted to a control unit which in turn operates the missile's steering system which, by way of a non-limiting example, activates the missile's control surfaces to change the missiles trajectory according to the guidance law.
This procedure of rotation of the missile's sensor and re-aligning of the missile has to be performed continuously, or quasi-continuously, since a missile cannot make sudden changes in direction, i.e., its flight path is always smooth, even though the missile's sensor is fitted on gimbals that allow for fairly large angles of rotation.
The process involved in updating an air-to-air missile equipped with a radar system is similar, the main difference being that in this case the target is maintained at the center of the field of view of the radar's antenna by maintaining a maximum target echo as received by the radar system.
A third possibility for primary guiding an intercepting missile toward a target is by the use of a data link system that obtains continuously data, which was acquired out side the missile, representative of target flight performance. It is obvious that also data link guidance cannot respond adequately to fast maneuvers of the target from short range.
As a result of the aforementioned reasons, an intercepting missile and an airborne target seldom reach a body-to-body contact. Hence intercepting missiles are equipped with a proximity fuse, which detonates the missile's warhead when the distance between the missile and the target has reached a small predetermined value, and the target is mainly affected by the blast, debris and fragments of the exploding warhead.
A detailed description of the damaging mechanisms of different warheads is given in the book "Conventional Warhead Systems Physics and Engineering Design" by Richard M. Lloyed, Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. 1998.
A conclusion of this text is that unless a direct hit on target is achieved, the lethality of a missile can not be guarantied, because only in direct hit, a sufficient enormous amount of kinetic energy and momentum is imparted from the colliding bodies to the target so the target will be "pulverized". The realization of this "hit to kill" concept is especially important when the target is a ballistic missile carrying an unconventional payload.
This is the reason that "hit to kill" is considered vital to any one of various defense programs such as e.g. the U.S. National Missile Defense (NMD) program.
However the "hit to kill" concept has not yet been implemented to intercepting missiles operating in the lower atmosphere, e.g. such as an air to air missiles launched by an aircraft.
It is therefore desired to have a method and a system which will provide the "hit to kill" feasibility to intercepting missile operating in the low atmosphere.
The present invention describes an intercepting missile which is equipped with an active imagery laser system which enables the missile to score a direct hit, and method of operation thereof.
Consequently the warhead of the intercepting missile and its activation mechanism may become redundant, a fact which will lead to cheaper and more reliable intercepting missiles.
In accordance with the present invention there is provided a method for guiding an intercepting missile to a body-to-body contact with an airborne target in the atmosphere, the method comprising the steps of: (a) guiding an intercepting missile to within an appropriate distance from the airborne target; (b) illuminating the airborne target, using an illuminator carried by the intercepting missile; (c) acquiring an image of the illuminated airborne target and, (d) steering the missile in accordance with an aimpoint on the image of the airborne target.
In accordance with the present invention there is provided an active imagery guidance system mounted on an intercepting missile for guiding the intercepting missile to a body-to-body contact with an airborne target in the atmosphere, the system comprising: (a) an active imagery system to acquire an image of an airborne target; (b) a mechanism to calculate an aimpoint on the image and, (c) a steering mechanism to steer the intercepting missile in accordance to the aimpoint.
In accordance with the present invention there is provided a hit to kill airborne target intercepting missile operating in the atmosphere comprising of: (a) a primary guidance system to guide the intercepting missile to within an appropriate distance from an airborne target; (b) an active imagery guidance system to guide the intercepting missile to a body-to-body contact with the airborne target.
In accordance with the present invention there is provided a hit to kill airborne target intercepting missile system operating in the atmosphere comprising: (a) a launching sub system to launch the intercepting missile; (b) a primary guidance system to guide the intercepting missile to within an appropriate distance from an airborne target and, (c) an active imagery guidance system to guide the intercepting missile to a body-to-body contact with said airborne target.
Other objects and benefits of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The invention is herein described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The present embodiments herein are not intended to be exhaustive and to limit in any way the scope of the invention, rather they are used as examples for the clarification of the invention and for enabling of other skilled in the art to utilize its teaching.
The purpose of the invention is to provide or to improve the "hit to kill" feasibility of an intercepting missile, accordingly the invention includes several aspects, one of which is to provide an aimpoint which is associated with a valid target only.
This is accomplished by fast acquiring of an image of the airborne target at a resolution, which will suffice for an algorithm of the seeker to recognize the nature of target, to define its boundaries and to select an aim point with respect to the image of the target.
This assures that the approaching missile will not be distracted from the target by decoy countermeasure means or spurious signals, which do not have an image of a certified target. Furthermore such a selected aiming point (in the image) provides a stable homing point (on the target) for the missile guiding mechanism, which is always accessible regardless of the relative position of the missile and the target, in contrast to e.g. an hot spot which may some times become hidden or ambiguous.
Consequently, a consistent steering of the missile toward such an homing point will result in a direct hit.
An optical image of an object can be acquired at different wavelength using various imaging techniques, each having its advantages and drawbacks.
The present invention uses active laser imagery, i.e. an image of the target is constructed by collecting the light, which is reflected from the target which is illuminated by a laser.
Active laser imaging and range finding systems are known in the art as laser radar (ladar) systems, which are substantially laser distance meters whose laser beam is scanned to raster at high speed a scene at some solid view angle.
By knowing the two polar angles of a reflecting point vector together with its distance, it is then possible to generate range and three dimension (3D) images over large structures in short times.
Scanning ladar systems use a single detecting element whose output is synchronized with the scanner. Such a system is described e.g. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,940,170 to Berg, et al.
The need for a scanner can be eliminated by using a more powerful laser whose beam can be spreaded and a detector array on which the entire scene is imaged simultaneously. Typical of such detector arrays are CCD arrays, which are available with hundreds or even thousands of pixels on a side. They convert incoming photons into electrical charge with reasonably high efficiency (generally more than 20%), which is stored within the detector element until read out.
Such detectors are suitable for forming an intensity image. However, as they integrate the incoming light, they are not suitable for direct determination of the phase shift of the modulation of the reflected signal and thus can not provide range or 3D images.
A Scannerless ladar employing focal plane detector arrays to obtain a three dimensional images of objects in field of view is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,877,851 by Stann, et al. Hence nowadays an advanced scannerless ladar with a staring focal plane detector array can be operated at three different modes: Range image mode, intensity image mode and 3D photographic mode which combines the first two modes.
The present invention employs a ladar system, either a scanning or a scannerless one, in its simplest operational mode, which is the image intensity mode, to construct a two dimension (2D) image of a target, although more sophisticated imaging modes can be used too.
A drawing of an operating ladar system according to the present invention is shown in FIG. 1. In
Portion 13 of the energy of the illuminating beam 12 is reflected back toward ladar device 11 and is collected by a suitable optical collector 14 e.g. a parabolic mirror which focuses the image on the pixels of a focal plane detector array 17 whose output 19 is used to produces a two dimension intensity image 18 of target 16.
A selected aimpoint 18' in the image 18 corresponds to the updated homing point 16' for the missile (shown in
As the relative position of the missile and target 16 may change very fast, it should be clear that the two important requirements for a ladar homing system for an intercepting missile are update rate and instant field-of-view (FOV).
Update rate is defined as the rate in which the detector array and the signal processor of the homing device can respond to an image contour or location change and calculate a new aimpoint 18'. This rate should be high as possible to assure the direct hit of the missile on target 16. When the relative velocity of the target 16 and the missile are known the update can be expressed in terms of distance.
FOV is the view angle, that within its boundaries objects are seen by the staring focal detector array 17 of the ladar device, FOV should be wide enough in order that a maneuvering target cannot escape from being viewed by the active imagery device even at a very close range.
When a scannerless ladar is used, the effective FOV of the concentric detector array is actually determined by the divergence angle of the laser beam.
Laser 15 of the ladar system is usually a solid state diode laser operating either in a continuous or a pulsed mode but other laser system e.g. a gas laser can be used as well. The wavelength of laser 15 can be in the visible, near IR (1-3 micrometer), mid IR (3-8 micrometer) or far IR (8-12 micrometer).
The detectors of focal plane array 17 are fast solid state devices responsive to the wavelength of the laser illumination such as CCD's, photodiodes, photoconductors or photo-multipliers. The light sensitive surface of the detectors is covered with a narrow band-width optical filter transmitting exclusively in the wavelength of the laser illumination, hence the system is affected by neither ambient background illumination or decoy countermeasure radiation, nor by temperature or color of the target.
The way in which the system operates is explained by the following non limiting example with conjunction to FIG. 2:
The intercepting missile 21, can be launched from any site on which a launcher may be located, e.g. from an air vehicle, from a sea vehicle and from a ground based station. Missile 21 has a guidance section 22 which includes two guidance mechanisms: a primary seeker/guidance system 26, which is based on an infra-red seeker, on a radar or on a data link unit 23, and an active imagery guidance system 27 which is base on the active laser imagery system 11 which was shown in FIG. 1.
Primary guidance system 26 brings intercepting missile 21 to within a range of about one to two kilometers from the tracked airborne target.
At such a range when the seeker is heading toward the target, a laser of the active laser imagery system 11 is activated and sends ahead a beam of light 12 having a solid divergence angle of about 3°C (which at a distance of 2 km from the missile illuminates roughly a scene area having a diameter of about 100 meters).
At this stage, as was explained and shown in
In this mode of operation the output of each of the elements of detector array 17 depends only on the intensity of the impinging light, thus such a detection mode yields an "electronic intensity image" which corresponds to a two dimensional optical image of target 16.
As said before, also more sophisticated electronic images, which correspond to range images and photo 3D images can be formed.
An algorithm running in an attached processor in the electronic assembly 30 of the missile may then perform a "target validation" if needed, E.g. it decides whether the acquired electronic image conforms to a possible 2D projection of a "certified" target.
In this case, if target validation fails the active laser imagery guidance system disregards the target and primary guidance control continues. However, if validation is positive or in case where it is not performed at al, an aimpoint 18' is selected over the target image. Aaimpoint 18' is generally the calculated center of gravity of intensity 2D image 18, but can also consist of another special point of the image.
Gguidance control is then transferred by a transfer mechanism 31, from primary guidance system 26 to active laser imagery guidance system 27 which by means of proportional navigation completes the steering of the missile to an homing point which is the anticipated colliding point between missile 21 and target 18 according to a computationally collision course of the missile 21 with aimpoint 18'.
Preferentially the intercepting missile should score a direct hit and kill the target due to the imparted impact, thus the desired body to body contact between the missile and the target should not be perturbed by an earlier detonation of the missile's warhead.
Thus, in case that missile 21 is equipped with a warhead 25 and a proximity fuse 28 to activate warhead 25, prior to or simultaneously with guidance transfer which was described above, the fuzing circuit of a proximity fuse 28 of missile 21 is either deactivated or reset to activate a warhead 25 of missile 21 at a zero distance from target.
While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, it will be appreciated that many variations, modifications and other applications of the invention may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 11815335, | Dec 15 2016 | Bae Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration INC | Guided munition systems for detecting off-axis targets |
| 6738012, | May 02 2003 | Honeywell Industrial Inc. | Protecting commercial airliners from man portable missiles |
| 6782826, | Nov 18 1999 | DEFENDTEX PTY LTD | Decoy |
| 6919840, | Nov 21 2002 | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | Integration of a semi-active laser seeker into the DSU-33 proximity sensor |
| 7059560, | Jun 18 2004 | Saab AB | System for determining the target range for a laser guided weapon |
| 7066427, | Feb 26 2004 | CHANG INDUSTRY, INC | Active protection device and associated apparatus, system, and method |
| 7104496, | Feb 26 2004 | CHANG INDUSTRY, INC | Active protection device and associated apparatus, system, and method |
| 7719664, | Apr 12 2006 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Imaging semi-active laser system |
| 7745767, | May 02 2005 | Nexter Munitions | Method of control of an ammunition or submunition, attack system, ammunition and designator implementing such a method |
| 7946207, | Jun 14 2007 | Raytheon Company | Methods and apparatus for countering a projectile |
| 7947937, | Oct 19 2007 | Concept Development Corporation | Laser guided projectile device and method therefor |
| 7977614, | Sep 03 2006 | E C S ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES-AEROSPACE LTD | Method and system for defense against incoming rockets and missiles |
| 8049869, | Apr 12 2006 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Dual FOV imaging semi-active laser system |
| 8339580, | Jun 30 2004 | Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC | Sensor-guided threat countermeasure system |
| 8536501, | Oct 22 2003 | The Boeing Company | Virtually attached node |
| 9367741, | Sep 20 2012 | MBDA FRANCE | Deviation indicator with infrared imagery and system for automatically aiming at and tracking a target |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 4324491, | Feb 12 1973 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy | Dual mode guidance system |
| 4898341, | Oct 12 1988 | Raytheon Company | Method of guiding missiles |
| 5626311, | Oct 12 1988 | Raytheon Company | Method of guiding missiles |
| 5877851, | Sep 24 1997 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army | Scannerless ladar architecture employing focal plane detector arrays and FM-CW ranging theory |
| 5940170, | Apr 12 1996 | Holometrics, Inc. | Laser scanning system |
| 6196497, | Jun 07 1997 | Bodenseewerk Geratetechnik GmbH | Infrared seeker head for target seeking missile |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Dec 05 2001 | SECKER, ARNON | Rafael-Armament Development Authority LTD | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012360 | /0958 | |
| Dec 07 2001 | Rafael-Armament Development Authority Ltd. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Mar 26 2007 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
| Mar 16 2011 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
| Mar 14 2015 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Sep 30 2006 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Mar 30 2007 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Sep 30 2007 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Sep 30 2009 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Sep 30 2010 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Mar 30 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Sep 30 2011 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Sep 30 2013 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Sep 30 2014 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Mar 30 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Sep 30 2015 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Sep 30 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |