A method for improving signaling efficiency and load balancing in a non-broadcast, multiple access network environment. The standard next hop resolution protocol (nhrp) essentially is extended to provide peer to peer, i.e., source station to destination station, communication regarding resource availability and internetwork layer address to NBMA subnetwork layer address resolution, rather than client-server communication between a source station and a server that communicates with the source station on behalf of the destination station, as is the case in standard nhrp.

Patent
   6631129
Priority
Oct 29 1999
Filed
Oct 29 1999
Issued
Oct 07 2003
Expiry
Oct 29 2019
Assg.orig
Entity
unknown
0
14
EXPIRED
1. A method for communicating information in a network, comprising:
a) sending a request for information about a destination node from a source node to a server node that responds to such requests on behalf of the destination node;
b) forwarding the request from the server node to the destination node;
c) sending a response to the request from the destination node to the server node; and
d) forwarding the response from the server node to the source node.
19. A method for communicating information in a network, comprising:
a) receiving a request for information about a destination node from a source node at a server node that responds to such requests on behalf of the destination node;
b) forwarding the request from the server node to the destination node;
c) receiving a response to the request from the destination node at the server node; and
d) forwarding the response from the server node to the source node.
14. An article of manufacture comprising a computer readable medium having computer readable program code means embodied thereon for communicating information in a network, comprising:
computer readable program code means for receiving a request for information about a destination node from a source node at a server node that responds to such requests on behalf of the destination node;
computer readable program code means for forwarding the request from the server node to the destination node;
computer readable program code means for receiving a response to the request from the destination node at the server node; and
computer readable program code means for forwarding the response from the server node to the source node.
20. A method for communicating internetwork layer address to subnetwork layer address resolution information in a nonbroadcast, multiple access subnetwork, comprising:
a) receiving at a next hop resolution protocol server (NHS) a next hop resolution protocol (nhrp) resolution request that was generated and transmitted by a source station to obtain internetwork layer address to subnetwork layer address resolution information for a destination station that is served by the NHS, the nhrp resolution request specifying the intemetwork layer address for the destination station;
b) determining at the NHS to forward the nhrp resolution request to the destination station;
c) receiving an nhrp resolution reply providing the internetwork layer address to NBMA subnetwork layer address resolution information generated and transmitted by the destination station to the NHS; and
d) transmitting the nhrp resolution reply from the NHS to the source station.
6. A method for communicating internetwork layer address to subnetwork layer address resolution information between peer stations in a nonbroadcast, multiple access subnetwork, comprising:
a) generating at a source station a next hop resolution protocol (nhrp) resolution request to obtain internetwork layer address to subnetwork layer address resolution information for a destination station, the nhrp resolution request specifying the intemetwork layer address for the destination station;
b) transmitting the nhrp resolution request to a next hop resolution protocol server (NHS) within the nonbroadcast multiple access subnetwork that serves the destination station;
c) determining at the NHS to forward the nhrp resolution request to the destination station;
d) generating at the destination station a nhrp resolution reply providing the internetwork layer address to NBMA subnetwork layer address resolution information;
e) transmitting the nhrp resolution reply from the destination station to the NHS; and
f) transmitting the nhrp resolution reply from the NHS to the source station.
16. A method for communicating internetwork layer address to subnetwork layer address resolution information in a nonbroadcast, multiple access subnetwork, comprising:
a) generating at a source station a next hop resolution protocol (nhrp) resolution request to obtain intemetwork layer address to subnetwork layer address resolution information for a destination station, the nhrp resolution request specifying an internetwork layer address for the destination station;
b) transmitting the nhrp resolution request to a next hop resolution protocol server (NHS) within the nonbroadcast multiple access subnetwork that serves a plurality of destination stations sharing the internetwork layer address;
c) determining at the NHS to forward the nhrp resolution request to a one of the plurality of destination stations according to an arbitration scheme;
d) generating at the one of the plurality of destination stations a nhrp resolution reply providing the internetwork layer address to NBMA subnetwork layer address resolution information;
e) transmitting the nhrp resolution reply from the one of the plurality of destination stations to the NHS; and
f) transmitting the nhrp resolution reply from the NHS to the source station.
15. An article of manufacture comprising a computer readable medium having computer readable program code means embodied thereon for communicating internetwork layer address to subnetwork layer address resolution information between peer stations in a nonbroadcast, multiple access subnetwork, comprising:
computer readable program code means at a next hop resolution protocol server (NHS) within the nonbroadcast multiple access subnetwork that serves a destination station, the computer readable program code means receiving a next hop resolution protocol (nhrp) resolution request from a source station to obtain internetwork layer address to subnetwork layer address resolution information for a destination station, the nhrp resolution request specifying the internetwork layer address for the destination station;
computer readable program code means for determining at the NHS to forward the nhrp resolution request to the destination station;
computer readable program code means at the NHS for receiving from the destination station a nhrp resolution reply providing the internetwork layer address to NBMA subnetwork layer address resolution information; and computer readable program code means at the NHS for transmitting the nhrp resolution reply from the NHS to the source station.
11. A method for communicating internetwork layer address to subnetwork layer address resolution information between peer stations in a nonbroadcast, multiple access subnetwork, comprising:
a) generating at a source station a next hop resolution protocol (nhrp) resolution request to obtain intemetwork layer address to subnetwork layer address resolution information for a destination station, the nhrp resolution request specifying the internetwork layer address for the destination station;
b) transmitting the nhrp resolution request to a next hop resolution protocol server (NHS) within the nonbroadcast multiple access subnetwork that serves the destination station;
c) determining at the NHS to forward the nhrp resolution request to the destination station;
d) determining at the destination station whether to receive or reject the nhrp resolution request forwarded from the NHS;
e) generating at the destination station a nhrp resolution reply providing the internetwork layer address to NBMA subnetwork layer address resolution information if the destination station determined to receive the nhrp resolution request forwarded from the NHS;
f) transmitting the nhrp resolution reply from the destination station to the NHS; and
g) transmitting the nhrp resolution reply from the NHS to the source station.
18. An article of manufacture comprising a computer readable medium having computer readable program code means embodied thereon for communicating internetwork layer address to subnetwork layer address resolution information, comprising:
computer readable program code means for generating at a source station a next hop resolution protocol (nhrp) resolution request to obtain internetwork layer address to subnetwork layer address resolution information for a destination station, the nhrp resolution request specifying an internetwork layer address for the destination station;
computer readable program code means for transmitting the nhrp resolution request to a next hop resolution protocol server (NHS) within the nonbroadcast multiple access subnetwork that serves a plurality of destination stations sharing the internetwork layer address;
computer readable program code means for determining at the NHS to forward the nhrp resolution request to a one of the plurality of destination stations according to an arbitration scheme;
computer readable program code means for generating at the one of the plurality of destination stations a nhrp resolution reply providing the internetwork layer address to NBMA subnetwork layer address resolution information; computer readable program code means for transmitting the nhrp resolution reply from the one of the plurality of destination stations to the NHS; and
computer readable program code means for transmitting the nhrp resolution reply from the NHS to the source station.
17. A method of communicating internetwork layer address to subnetwork layer address resolution information, comprising:
a) generating at a source station a next hop resolution protocol (nhrp) resolution request to obtain internetwork layer address to subnetwork layer address resolution information for a destination station, the nhrp resolution request specifying an internetwork layer address for the destination station;
b) transmitting the nhrp resolution request to a next hop resolution protocol server (NHS) within the nonbroadcast multiple access subnetwork that serves a plurality of destination stations sharing the internetwork layer address;
c) determining at the NHS to forward the nhrp resolution request to one of the plurality of destination stations according to an arbitration scheme;
d) generating at the one of the plurality of destination stations one of: a nhrp resolution reply providing the internetwork layer address to NBMA subnetwork layer address resolution information; and a negative nhrp resolution reply that fails to provide the internetwork layer address to NBMA subnetwork layer address resolution information;
e) transmitting the nhrp resolution reply from the one of the plurality of destination stations to the NHS;
f) repeating c through e until one of: the nhrp resolution reply provides the internetwork layer address to NBMA subnetwork layer address resolution information; and the last of the one of the plurality of destination stations transmits the nhrp resolution reply to the NHS; and
f) transmitting the nhrp resolution reply from the NHS to the source station.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein sending a request for information about a destination node from a source node to a server node that responds to such requests on behalf of the destination node comprises sending a Next hop resolution protocol (nhrp) resolution request from a nhrp capable source node to a nhrp server node that responds to such requests on behalf of the destination node.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein forwarding the request from the server node to the destination node comprises forwarding the nhrp resolution request from the nhrp server node to the destination node.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein sending a response to the request from the destination node to the server node comprises sending a nhrp resolution reply to the nhrp resolution request from the destination node to the nhrp server node.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein forwarding the response from the server node to the source node comprises forwarding the nhrp resolution reply from the nhrp server node to the nhrp capable source node.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein determining at the NHS to forward the nhrp resolution request to the destination station further comprises determining that the destination station previously transmitted a nhrp registration request to the NHS requesting the NHS to forward any nhrp resolution request that specified the internetwork layer address for the destination station to the destination station.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein determining that the destination station previously transmitted a nhrp registration request to the NHS requesting the NHS to forward any nhrp resolution request that specified the internetwork layer address for the destination station to the destination station further comprises determining that the destination station previously transmitted a nhrp registration request to the NHS, the nhrp registration request specifying a unique time/length/value (TLV) extension value that the NHS recognized as requesting the NHS to forward any nhrp resolution request that specified the internetwork layer address for the destination station to the destination station.
9. The method of claim 6, wherein determining at the NHS to forward the nhrp resolution request to the destination station further comprises determining that the NHS was previously configured to request the NHS to forward any nhrp resolution request that specified the internetwork layer address for the destination station to the destination station.
10. The method of claim 6, wherein determining at the NHS to forward the nhrp resolution request to the destination station further comprises determining that the NHS previously received a communication via an internetworking protocol instructing the NHS to forward any nhrp resolution request that specified the internetwork layer address for the destination station to the destination station.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein determining at the destination station whether to receive or reject the nhrp resolution request forwarded from the NHS comprises determining at the destination station whether to receive or reject the nhrp resolution request forwarded from the NHS based on management signaling.
13. The method of claim 11, wherein determining at the destination station whether to receive or reject the nhrp resolution request forwarded from the NHS comprises determining at the destination station whether to receive or reject the nhrp resolution request forwarded from the NHS based on user configuration.

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention is related to data communications. In particular, the present invention is related to a method for resolving a request for information in a multiprotocol intemetwork environment operating over Non-Broadcast Multiple Access (NBMA) subnetworks.

2. Description of the Related Art

The Next Hop Resolution Protocol (NHRP) is described in Luciani, J., Katz, D., Piscitello, D., Cole, B., and Doraswamy, N., "NBMA Next Hop Resolution Protocol (NHRP)", IETF RFC 2332, April, 1998. With reference to FIG. 1, the NHRP allows a source station 110 (a node, host, switch, router, etc.) in a multiprotocol internetwork 100 to communicate with a destination station 130 over a Non-Broadcast, Multiple Access (NBMA) subnetwork 105. The NHRP provides source station 110 with the capability to determine the NBMA address of the NBMA next hop toward the destination station, through the exchange of NHRP resolution requests and resolution replies. As pointed out in RFC 2332, the NBMA subnetwork may be non-broadcast because it does not support broadcasting (e.g., an X.25 or ATM subnetwork) or broadcasting is not possible, for example, in the case of a Local Area Network (LAN) that supports a large number of stations. In FIG. 1, the NBMA next hop toward the destination station is router 120 since it is the closest router to destination station 130 and provides egress from the NBMA subnetwork. It should be noted that terms used herein to describe the present invention, such as internetwork layer, server, client, and station, are to be interpreted in a manner consistent with the definition and use of such terms as provided in RFC 2332.

In accordance with the NHRP, Next Hop Servers (NHSs) are provided in the NBMA subnetwork which are capable of responding to NHRP resolution requests. In FIG. 1, egress router 125 also functions as a NHS, and serves one or more destination stations, such as destination station 130. Likewise, ingress router 115 must function as a NHS for station 110.

An NHS builds and maintains a data structure that contains internetwork layer address (e.g., an Internet Protocol address) to NBMA subnetwork layer address resolution information. The table may be built and managed in accordance with techniques known to those of ordinary skill in the related arts. For example, a station may send a NHRP registration request to a NHS serving the station. The NHRP registration request contains internetwork layer address to NBMA subnetwork layer address resolution information that is then stored in the table maintained by the NHS.

A station that is a client of the NHRP service is known as a NHRP Client, or simply NHC. The NHS with which a NHC communicates to provide NBMA next hop information is the serving NHS for the NHC. In FIG. 1, NHS 115 serves station (NHC) 110, and NHS 125 serves station (NHC) 130 in most cases. For a serving NHS to supply address resolution information to a NHC, a continuous link of NHSs must exist along a path in the NBMA subnetwork between the NHC making the NHRP resolution request and the destination NHC, e.g., NHSs 115, 120 and 125. In accordance with RFC 2332, the last NHS along the path within the NBMA subnetwork is the serving NHS. That is, NHRP resolution requests are not forwarded to destination station/NHCs but are processed by the serving NHS. However, each NHC also maintains a table of internetwork layer address to NBMA address resolution information that it obtains from NHRP resolution replies, manual configuration, or through mechanisms outside the scope of the NHRP. Destination NHCs may be constrained on resource (e.g., SAR VPI/VCIs), and there is no existing mechanism to communicate that fact to the serving NHS which would normally reply to a resolution request on behalf of the NHC. Thus, the only way that a source station would find that out would be to attempt a connection setup and fail which is time consuming and resource intensive. By allowing the destination NHC to reply for itself, since it is in the best situation to know whether it has resource enough for the connection, signaling efficiency is gained since no additional connection setup attempt will be tried by the source station. Moreover, in the situation where multiple NHCs register with a given serving NHS for the same set of NBMA subnetwork addresses (e.g., for the same set of ATM attached servers/services), the NHS may perform service load balancing by forwarding the resolution request to a particular NHC and if that NHC then NAKs the resolution request, the serving NHS may offer the request to another NHC which is not currently busy. Further the NHS may choose to offer the request in some scheduled fashion (e.g., round robining ) to each of the appropriate NHCs in turn.

A method is described for forwarding NHRP resolution requests directly to an NHC so that the NHC itself may respond to the NHRP resolution request with a NHRP resolution reply, rather than having the serving NHS reply to the resolution request on behalf of the NHC.

The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the following figures, in which:

FIG. 1 is a prior art diagram of a multiprotocol internetwork environment operating over an NBMA subnetwork.

FIG. 2 illustrates an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 illustrates a multiprotocol internetwork environment in which an embodiment of the present invention may be utilized.

Described is a method providing for a NHC to respond to a NHRP resolution request. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known architectures, steps, and techniques have not been shown to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the present invention.

With reference to FIG. 2, an embodiment of the present invention 200 proceeds as follows. The process starts as 205, wherein source station 110, given the internetwork layer address of destination station 130, seeks to resolve the NBMA subnetwork address of a path to station 130. At 210, if the NBMA subnetwork address information for the path to station 130 is already available in the address resolution table maintained at the source station, then that information is utilized by the source station in communicating with station 130 and the resolution process is done at 215. Otherwise, the source station creates at 220 a NHRP resolution request packet comprising the internetwork layer address of the destination station as the destination address, the intemetwork layer address of the source station as the source address, and the NBMA subnetwork address information for the source station. Source station 110 then transmits the NHRP resolution request packet at 225 to the nearest NHS (i.e., ingress router 115) along the routed path of NHSs within the NBMA subnetwork 105, toward the destination station 130.

The NHS 115 receives the NHRP resolution request at 230, examines at 235 whether it serves destination station 130, and if not, forwards the resolution request at 225 to the next NHS in the routed path to destination station 130, in this case, intermediate NHS 120.

The process continues in this manner until NHS 125 receives and examines the destination internetwork address in the resolution request packet and determines at 235 that it serves destination station 130. NHS 125 then considers at 240 whether it should respond to the NHRP resolution request on behalf of its NHS, destination station 130, or whether it should forward the resolution request on to the destination station so that the destination station may respond directly to the resolution request. If the serving NHS determines it should reply to the resolution request on behalf of its NHC, destination station 130, then the serving NHS formulates, and transmits at 260, a positive NHRP resolution reply that resolves the NBMA address information for destination station 130 on the destination station's behalf. Otherwise, the serving NHS forwards the resolution request to the NHC at 245. The NHC resolves the destination station 130 NBMA address information at 250. In 255 the NHC transmits an NHRP resolution reply to the serving NHS. Then the serving NHS transmits the NHRP resolution reply to the source stations. The NHRP resolution reply packet contains the address resolution information for the destination station and is sent back to the source station. It should be noted that if the destination station is not on the NBMA subnetwork, as is the case in multiprotocol internetwork 100, the next hop subnetwork layer address will be that of the egress router 125 through which packets addressed to the destination station are forwarded.

In determining at 240 whether the serving NHS or the NHC/destination station should respond to a NHRP resolution request, in one embodiment of the present invention, a destination station may inform its serving NHS that it wishes to directly reply to NHRP resolution requests received at the serving NHS from another station. One manner in which the NHC may inform the serving NHS of its wish to directly reply to NHRP resolution requests is to indicate via a unique time/length/value (TLV) extension to a NHRP registration request packet that it wishes to receive and respond to any NHRP resolution requests that the serving NHS receives, rather than allowing the serving NHS to respond to the resolution request on behalf of the NHC/destination station.

In another embodiment, different TLV values may be specified in a NHRP registration request sent from the NHC to the NHS to indicate certain situations under which it is applicable for or desired that the NHS forward NHRP resolution requests to the NHC. For example, the NHC may specify via the TLV extension part of a NHRP registration request packet certain resource constraints on the NHS during which time the NHS is to forward NHRP resolution requests about the NHC to the NHC rather than responding to the request on behalf of the NHC. Alternatively, a NHC may choose whether to reject or accept a NHRP resolution request forwarded to it from its serving NHS based on an agreed upon configuration, e.g., through manual (user) configuration, management signaling, etc, or via information obtained by another protocol, for example, via a routing protocol. Under these approaches, communication of such configuration via the TLV extension in a NHRP registration request packet is not necessary.

With respect to FIG. 3, in yet another embodiment of the present invention, when multiple NHCs, e.g., stations 130, 140 and 150, transmit NHRP registration requests to the serving NHS 125 to register for the same destination address or set of destination addresses (e.g., for the same set of ATM attached servers/services), the NHS may perform load balancing by directing a NHRP resolution request to a certain one or more of the NHCs. The choice of which one or more of the NHCs to offer the request to and in what manner is a local matter. An appropriate NHC may be selected according to any one of a number of means. For example, a round robin, weighted round robin, or some other arbitration scheme may be employed to select the appropriate NHC to receive the NHRP resolution request. Moreover, the NHIC selected may decide to accept or reject the NHRP resolution request based on certain criteria, such as resource availability, source address of is the source station, or any other well known packet filtering technique. This approach often is advantageous given that a particular NHC generally is in a better position to determine if it is willing to receive communications from a source station than its serving NHS.

In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 3, if a given NHC has indicated to its serving NHS that it is capable of receiving and responding directly to a NHRP resolution request, but nevertheless decides to reject a NHR-P resolution request, then the serving NHS, upon receiving a negative NRRP resolution reply from the NHC, may elect to forward the NHRP resolution request on to another NHC that satisfies the request criteria. In this way, an improved load balancing capability and better set up connection signaling efficiency is achieved.

Luciani, James V.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
Patent Priority Assignee Title
5420862, Jun 14 1991 ENTERASYS NETWORKS, INC Router using remote address resolution to enable bridge like data forwarding
5828844, Oct 08 1996 AT&T Corp. Internet NCP over ATM
5835725, Oct 21 1996 Cisco Technology, Inc Dynamic address assignment and resolution technique
5894479, Dec 10 1996 Intel Corporation Providing address resolution information for self registration of clients on power-up or dial-in
5996021, May 20 1997 AT&T Corp Internet protocol relay network for directly routing datagram from ingress router to egress router
6009102, Aug 15 1996 NEC Corporation NHRP packet authentication method and NHRP server
6021263, Feb 16 1996 THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT Management of ATM virtual circuits with resources reservation protocol
6047329, Aug 15 1996 NEC Corporation Non-broadcast multi-access network system capable of carrying out transmission of a Next Hop Resolution Protocol packet without setting internet protocol addresses
6061739, Nov 26 1997 International Business Machines Corporation Network address assignment using physical address resolution protocols
6178171, Nov 24 1997 International Business Machines Corporation Route switching mechanisms for source-routed ATM networks
6252857, Mar 04 1998 AT&T Corp. Method and apparatus for provisioned and dynamic quality of service in a communications network
6253230, Sep 22 1998 International Business Machines Corporation Distributed scalable device for selecting a server from a server cluster and a switched path to the selected server
6381638, Feb 24 1999 HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P System and method for options based address reuse
6421321, Feb 25 1997 Fujitsu Limited Apparatus and a method for transferring a packet flow in a communication network
/
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Oct 29 1999Nortel Networks Limited(assignment on the face of the patent)
Date Maintenance Fee Events


Date Maintenance Schedule
Oct 07 20064 years fee payment window open
Apr 07 20076 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Oct 07 2007patent expiry (for year 4)
Oct 07 20092 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Oct 07 20108 years fee payment window open
Apr 07 20116 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Oct 07 2011patent expiry (for year 8)
Oct 07 20132 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Oct 07 201412 years fee payment window open
Apr 07 20156 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Oct 07 2015patent expiry (for year 12)
Oct 07 20172 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)