One embodiment of a method for producing a gas sensor, comprises: disposing said gas sensor in a basic agent solution comprising a basic agent comprises a hydroxide of a metal selected from the group consisting of Group IA of the periodic table of Elements; Group IIA of the periodic table of Elements, and combinations comprising at least one of the foregoing basic agents, wherein said gas sensor comprises an electrolyte disposed between and in ionic communication with a first electrode and a second electrode; and disposing said gas sensor in an acidic agent solution.
|
1. A method for producing a gas sensor, comprising:
disposing said gas sensor in a basic agent solution, wherein the basic agent comprises a hydroxide of a metal selected from the group consisting of Group IA of the periodic table of Elements; Group IIA of the periodic table of Elements, and combinations comprising at least one of the foregoing metals, wherein said gas sensor comprise; solid electrolyte disposed between and in ionic communication with a first electrode and a second electrode; and disposing said gas sensor in an acidic agent solution: wherein a chemically treated sensor is formed.
2. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
6. The method of
7. The method of
8. The method of
9. The method of
10. The method of
11. The method of
12. The method of
13. The method of
14. The method of
15. The method of
16. The method of
17. The method of
18. The method of
20. The method of
|
Automotive vehicles with an internal combustion engine have an exhaust system including a pathway for exhaust gas to move away from the engine. Depending on the desired operating state, internal combustion engines can be operated with fuel/air ratios in which (1) the fuel constituent is present in a stoichiometric surplus (rich range), (2) the oxygen of the air constituent is stoichiometrically predominant (lean range), and (3) the fuel and air constituents satisfy stoichiometric requirements. The composition of the fuel-air mixture determines the composition of the exhaust gas. In the rich range, considerable quantities of nonburned or partially burned fuel are found, while the oxygen has been substantially consumed and has nearly disappeared. In the lean range, the ratios are reversed, and in a stoichiometric composition of the fuel-air mixture, both fuel and oxygen are minimized.
It is well known that the oxygen concentration in the exhaust gas of an engine has a direct relationship to the air-to-fuel ratio of the fuel mixture supplied to the engine. As a result, gas sensors, namely oxygen sensors, are used in automotive internal combustion control systems to provide accurate oxygen concentration measurements of automobile exhaust gases for determination of optimum combustion conditions, maximization of fuel economy, and management of exhaust emissions.
A switch type oxygen sensor, generally, comprises an ionically conductive solid electrolyte material, a sensing electrode which is exposed to the exhaust gas and reference electrode is subjected to a reference gas such as air or oxygen at known partial pressure. It operates in potentiometric mode, where oxygen partial pressure differences between the exhaust gas and reference gas on opposing faces of the electrochemical cell develop an electromotive force, which can be described by the Nernst equation:
where:
E=electromotive force
R=universal gas constant
F=Faraday constant
T=absolute temperature of the gas
PrefO
PO
The large oxygen partial pressure difference between rich and lean exhaust gas conditions creates a step-like difference in cell output at the stoichiometric point; the switch-like behavior of the sensor enables engine combustion control about stoichiometry. Stoichiometric exhaust gas, which contains unburned hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and oxides of nitrogen, can be converted very efficiently to water, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen by automotive three-way catalysts in automotive catalytic converters. In addition to their value for emissions control, the sensors also provide improved fuel economy and drivability.
Further control of engine combustion can be obtained using amperometric mode exhaust sensors, where oxygen is electrochemically pumped through an electrochemical cell using an applied voltage. A gas diffusion-limiting barrier creates a current limited output, the level of which is proportional to the oxygen content of the exhaust gas. These sensors typically consist of two or more electrochemical cells; one of these cells operates in potentiometric mode and serves as a reference cell, while another operates in amperometric mode and serves as an oxygen-pumping cell. This type of sensor, known as a wide range or linear air/fuel ratio sensor provides information beyond whether the exhaust gas is qualitatively rich or lean; it can quantitatively measure the air/fuel ratio of the exhaust gas.
Due to increasing demands for improved fuel utilization and emissions control, more recent emphasis has been on wide range oxygen sensors capable of accurately determining the oxygen partial pressure in exhaust gas for internal combustion engines operating under both fuel-rich and fuel-lean conditions. Such conditions require an oxygen sensor which is capable of rapid response to changes in oxygen partial pressure by several orders of magnitude, while also having sufficient sensitivity to accurately determine the oxygen partial pressure in both the fuel-rich and fuel-lean conditions.
The temperature of the exhaust gases ranges from ambient temperature, when the engine has not been run recently, to higher than 1,000°C C. Since air-fuel ratio output signal depends largely on the exhaust gas temperature, temperature compensation is needed. A heater assists an oxygen sensor, in making more precise measurements over a wide range of exhaust gas temperatures, especially when the exhaust gas temperature is low. The addition of the heater also helps to decrease the light-off time of the sensor, that is the time that it takes for the sensor to reach the minimum temperature for proper operation.
Reduction of light-off times has been accomplished through the use of high power heaters. One method for further decreasing light-off times while using only small or modest heating power is to substantially decrease the size of the sensing element, especially the electrolyte. Similarly, during low temperature operation (e.g., about 350°C C. or less), the switching time, or time required for the sensor to detect a change from rich to lean or lean to rich exhaust gas compositions, must be as low as possible, preferably below about a half second (500 milliseconds).
The internal resistance of the sensor is further factor that should be controlled. A low internal resistance or impedance will allow the sensor to sink or source more useful current from the monitoring system that is being used for determining the oxygen content of the exhaust gas.
A gas sensor and a method for producing the same is disclosed herein. One embodiment of the method comprises: disposing said gas sensor in a basic agent comprises a hydroxide of a metal selected from Group IA or Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba, etc., from Group IIA of the Periodic Table of Elements, and combinations comprising at least one of the foregoing metals, wherein said gas sensor comprises an electrolyte disposed between and in ionic communication with a first electrode and a second electrode; and disposing said gas sensor in an acidic agent solution.
These and other features will be apparent from the following brief description of the drawings, detailed description, and attached drawings.
Referring now to the following Figures, in which:
Although described in connection with an oxygen sensor, it is to be understood that the sensor, which can comprise any geometry (e.g., conical, flat plate, and the like) could be a nitrogen oxide sensor, hydrogen sensor, hydrocarbon sensor, or the like. Furthermore, while oxygen is the reference gas used in the description disclosed herein, it should be understood that other gases could be employed as a reference gas. Additionally, as used herein, unless otherwise stated, "chemically treated" or "cleaned" sensor refers to a sensor treated with both a basic agent solution and an acid agent solution; and an "non-treated", "as sintered" or "as produced" sensor refers to a sensor which did not receive electrical aging, acid, and/or basic treatment after the sintering step.
The support layers (24), heater (25), contacts (28, 29) and leads (26, 36), can be composed of materials conventionally used in exhaust sensors. For example, the support layers (24) can comprise a dielectric material such as a metal oxide, e.g., alumina, while the heater (25), contacts (28, 29) and leads (26, 36) can comprise a thermally and electrically conductive metal such as platinum, palladium, ruthenium, and the like, and other metals, metal oxides, and alloys and mixtures comprising at least one of the foregoing metals.
The solid electrolyte (20) can be formed of any material that is capable of permitting the electrochemical transfer of oxygen ions while inhibiting the passage of exhaust gases. Possible solid electrolyte materials include conventionally employed materials such as zirconia, ceria, calcia, yttria, lanthana, magnesia, and the like, as well as combinations comprising at least one of the foregoing electrolyte materials, such as yttria doped zirconia and the like.
Disposed adjacent to the solid electrolyte (20) are electrodes (21, 22). The sensing electrode (21), which is exposed to the exhaust gas during operation, preferably has a porosity sufficient to permit diffusion of oxygen molecules therethrough. Similarly, the reference electrode (22), which is typically exposed to a reference gas such as oxygen, air, or the like, during operation, preferably has a porosity sufficient to permit diffusion to oxygen molecules therethrough. These electrodes can comprise any metal capable of ionizing oxygen, including, but not limited to, noble metals such as platinum, palladium, gold, osmium, rhodium, iridium and ruthenium; and metal oxides, such as zirconia, yttria, ceria, calcia, alumina, and the like; as well as combinations comprising at least one of the foregoing metals and metal oxides.
Disposed on the exterior side of the sensing electrode (21) is a protective coating layer (23) which protects the sensing electrode (21) from impurities that cause poisoning of the electrode. The protective coating an comprise a spinel (e.g., magnesium aluminate), alumina, zirconia, and the like, as well as combinations comprising at least one of the foregoing materials.
Essentially, for a planar sensor, the sensor components, e.g., electrodes (21, 22), electrolyte (20), support layers (24), heater (25), leads (26, 36), vias (32), contacts (28, 29), lead gettering layer, ground plane, porous electrolyte, pumping cell, fugitive material (reference chamber), and the like, are formed using techniques such as tape casting methods, sputtering, punching and place, spraying (e.g., electrostatically spraying, slurry spraying, plasma spraying, and the like), dipping, painting, and the like as well as combinations comprising at least one of the foregoing. The components are then laid-up in accordance with the particular type of sensor. The sensor is then heat treated to laminate the layers together. Typically, the sensor is heated to a temperature of about 1475°C C. to about 1550°C C. for a sufficient period of time to fully fire the layers, with a temperature of about 1490°C C. to about 1510°C C. preferred, for a period of up to about 3 hours or so, with about 100 minutes to about 140 minutes preferred.
The sintered sensor is subject to chemical treatments using both a basic agent and an acidic agent, preferably in sequence of a basic agent treatment followed by an acidic agent treatment. As the basic agent, an alkali or alkaline earth metal hydroxide can be employed. Possible basic agents include hydroxides of metals in Group IA of the Periodic Table of Elements, Group IIA of the Periodic Table of Elements, and the like, as well as combinations comprising at least on of the foregoing metals. For example, the basic agent comprises sodium hydroxide, lithium hydroxide, magnesium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, cesium hydroxide, barium hydroxide, strontium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, and the like, as well as combinations comprising at least one of the foregoing basic agents, with potassium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide preferred. The concentration of basic agent in the basic agent solution, which is preferably an aqueous solution, can be up to the solubility level of the basic agent, with less than or equal to about 45 weight percent (wt %) preferred, less than or equal to about 25 wt % more preferred, and less than or equal to about 20 wt % especially preferred, balance water. It is further preferred to employ a basic agent solution comprising greater than or equal to about 2 wt % basic agent, with greater than or equal to about 3 wt % basic agent more preferred, and greater than or equal to about 5 wt % basic agent especially preferred.
The acidic agent solution can comprise hydrochloric acid (HCl) in a concentration of up to the solubility level of the acidic agent, with less than or equal to about 25 wt % preferred, less than or equal to about 15 wt % more preferred, and less than or equal to about 10 wt % especially preferred, balance water. It is further preferred to employ an acidic agent solution comprising greater than or equal to about 2 wt % acidic agent, with greater than or equal to about 3 wt % acidic agent more preferred, and greater than or equal to about 4 wt % acidic agent especially preferred.
The duration of each treatment, which can be varied between several minutes and several hours, is dependent upon the concentration and temperature of the solution. The temperature of the solutions can individually range from ambient (e.g., about 25°C C. or less) to boiling. In order to simplify temperature control of the solutions and process time requirements, the solutions are preferably maintained at boiling. Optionally, between the solution treatments and after the second solution treatment, the sensor can be rinsed with water, preferably deionized water. Finally, the sensor can be dried in a temperature ranging from ambient to a temperature which will not adversely effect the sensor components. To facilitate drying, the sensor is preferably dried at a temperature of about 700°C C. to about 900°C C., with a temperature of about 750°C C. to about 850°C C. preferred. It is further preferred to dry the sensor under an inert atmosphere (e.g., nitrogen, argon, helium, and the like, as well as combinations comprising at least one of the foregoing inert atmospheres; e.g., nitrogen with less than or equal to 4 wt % hydrogen.
For example, a sensor can be treated with a 1 hour dip in 20 wt % basic agent (e.g., potassium hydroxide) boiling solution followed by a 3 hour dip in an acidic agent solution (e.g., 5H2O:1HCl) boiling solution with appropriate de-ionized water rinses. The sensor can then be dried for 1 hour at 800°C C. in a nitrogen atmosphere. The sequential treatment, first with an alkali followed by hydrochloric acid, is designed to optimize the amplitude and rich voltage of the sensor in the exhaust gas.
Referring to the figures,
In
Chemically treated sensors provide higher pump currents than non-treated sensors. For example, chemically treated sensors, employing at heater at 6.6 watts, have a pump current of greater than or equal to about 3 mA at 0.5 volts, with a pump current of greater than or equal to about 3.5 mA at 0.5 volts preferred. Similarly, at 1 volt, with a heater at 6.6 watts, the chemically treated sensor has a pump current of greater than or equal to about 5 mA, with a pump current of greater than or equal to about 7 mA preferred, and a pump current of greater than or equal to about 8.5 mA especially preferred. In contrast, a non-treated sensor, at 1 volt, with a heater at 6.6 watts, has a pump current of less than or equal to about 1 mA.
For testing other factors such as switching time, static and dynamic response, and ability of the sensors under test to follow a wide range, chemically treated and electrically aged and hydrofluoric acid treated sensors were packaged for engine tests.
A comparison of
Sensor structures are often contaminated during manufacturing process due to sintering aids and unintentional impurities in raw materials. By the chemical treatment, especially the sequential basic agent solution followed by acidic agent solution treatment, impurities are removed. The chemical treatment improves the sensor amplitude and eliminates sensor output voltage instabilities, high impedance, and poor switching characteristics by leaching contaminants from sensing electrode, electrolyte, sensing electrode--electrolyte interface, and the reference electrode.
As described above, exhaust sensors provide feed back information that is important for improving the efficiency and performance of a vehicle. The chemically treated exhaust sensor has improved accuracy, reliability, reproducibility and much reduced effect of aging on the engine also known as "green effect".
Chemical cleaning reduces the electrode impedance by a factor of 10 at 550°C C. and its sensitivity to temperature and in that respect it is better or at least comparable to electrically aged and hydrofluoric acid treated sensor. Chemical cleaning, however, also improves the electrocatalytic activity of the electrode such that, at 440°C C. exhaust gas temperature, the lean to rich response is 3 times and rich to lean time is 2 times improved compared to electrically aged and hydrofluoric acid treated sensors. For a control system to be useful, the sensor should have sufficiently low impedance to shorten the light-off time of the sensor especially at the initial stage of engine operation, (e.g., much less than about 50 kilo-ohms (kΩ) at about 300°C C.) when the exhaust gas is still at low temperature. A non-treated sensor has impedance that can exceed about 3 kΩ below 550°C C. and an electrically aged and hydrofluoric acid treated sensor has impedance of about 3 kΩ at 490°C C. In contrast, the chemically treated sensor has an impedance of about 3 kΩ about 400°C C. because of reduced sensitivity of electrode impedance to temperature. While preferred embodiments have been shown and described, various modifications and substitutions may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly it is to be understood that the apparatus and methods have been described by way of illustration only, and such illustrations and embodiments as have been disclosed herein are not to be construed as limiting to the claims.
Wang, Da Yu, Jain, Kailash C., Kikuchi, Paul, Detwiler, Eric J.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
6916384, | Oct 22 2001 | Delphi Technologies, Inc. | Method of treating a gas sensor |
7048844, | Nov 15 2002 | Delphi Technologies, Inc. | Gas sensor and method for use thereof |
7097875, | Dec 19 2002 | Delphi Technologies, Inc | Methods of making gas sensors and sensors formed therefrom |
7241477, | Jul 21 2003 | Delphi Technologies, Inc. | Methods of treating electrodes and gas sensors comprising the electrodes |
7244316, | May 15 2003 | DELPHI TECHNOLOGIES IP LIMITED | Methods of making gas sensors and sensors formed therefrom |
7611612, | Jul 14 2005 | EmiSense Technologies, LLC | Multilayer ceramic NOx gas sensor device |
7644576, | Apr 25 2005 | NITERRA CO , LTD | Sensor control device |
9164080, | Jun 11 2012 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | System and method for sensing NO |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3556957, | |||
4136000, | Mar 13 1978 | Bendix Autolite Corporation | Process for producing improved solid electrolyte oxygen gas sensors |
4169777, | Mar 13 1978 | Bendix Autolite Corporation | Process for producing an activated oxygen gas sensor element |
4426253, | Dec 03 1981 | E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. | High speed etching of polyimide film |
4986880, | Nov 29 1989 | E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY | Process for etching polyimide substrate in formation of unsupported electrically conductive leads |
5334284, | Dec 23 1992 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Surface treatment of indium phosphide utilizing chemical roughening of the surface |
5360528, | Jul 20 1992 | General Motors Corporation | Wide range oxygen sensor |
5389225, | Jan 24 1989 | Honeywell INC | Solid-state oxygen microsensor and thin structure therefor |
5433830, | Dec 29 1993 | NGK SPARK PLUG CO , LTD | Method of activating zirconia oxygen sensor |
5474665, | Sep 30 1993 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Measuring sensor for determining the oxygen content of gas mixtures |
5733504, | Feb 17 1994 | General Motors Corporation | Catalytic/ceramic oxide microcomposites for use as exhaust sensor pre-equilibration zone |
5787866, | Apr 12 1996 | Denso Corporation | Air-fuel ratio sensor |
5827415, | Sep 26 1994 | The Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jun. Univ. | Oxygen sensor |
6179989, | Jun 03 1998 | General Motors Corporation | Electrical and chemical treatment of an oxygen sensor |
6182498, | Jan 28 1998 | NGK SPARK PLUG CO , LTD ; HONDA MOTOR CO , LTD | Oxygen sensor |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Aug 26 2001 | JAIN, KAILASH C | Delphi Technologies, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012161 | /0716 | |
Aug 26 2001 | WANG, DA YU | Delphi Technologies, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012161 | /0716 | |
Aug 26 2001 | DETWILER, ERIC J | Delphi Technologies, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012161 | /0716 | |
Aug 27 2001 | KIKUCHI, PAUL | Delphi Technologies, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012161 | /0716 | |
Sep 10 2001 | Delphi Technologies, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
May 16 2007 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Oct 28 2007 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 28 2006 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 28 2007 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 28 2007 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 28 2009 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 28 2010 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 28 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 28 2011 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 28 2013 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 28 2014 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 28 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 28 2015 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 28 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |