The invention relates to a method for describing a predetermined desired course (1) with a beam of particles or waves, wherein a movable beam-directing device influences the direction of the beam, so that the latter describes an actual course (3, 4). The deviation of the actual course (3, 4) from the desired course due to inertia is minimized by specifying a corrected desired course (2), which describes diversions at the point of direction changes. The invention also relates to the use of this method for laser structuring or for writing guard plates or dial plates.
|
1. A method for describing a course in accordance with a desired course having a direction change, comprising using a beam of particles or waves, and a movable beam-directing device which influences the direction of the beam so that it describes an actual course with a velocity VB, when projected onto a surface, further comprising converting the desired course by a drive device, while taking account of a response error time due to the beam-directing device's mechanical inertia in a corrected desired course which, in the vicinity of the direction change from a first direction to a second direction describes a diversion which is obtained by appending and/or deleting arbitrary sections to/from the desired course, and wherein the corrected desired course is translated by the drive device into control instructions for the beam-directing device.
2. The method according to
3. The method according to
4. The method according to
6. The method according to
7. The method according to
8. The method according to
9. The method according to
10. The method according to
|
The invention relates to a method for describing a predetermined or desired course with a beam of particles or waves, wherein the direction of the beam can be modified by a movable beam-directing device. The invention also relates to the use of the novel method.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,593,606 discloses methods in which a pulsed laser beam is deflected by a motor-controlled mirror. The data of a predetermined desired course is translated by a drive device into control instructions for the motor. The movable beam-directing device influences the direction of the beam which describes an actual course with a velocity VB when projected onto a surface.
These known methods have the disadvantage that in the case of a desired straight-line course the actual course is described with a constant delay by the response error time tS, owing to the mechanical inertia of the beam-directing device. The effect of this response error is that the actual course that corresponds to a curved desired course deviates therefrom. In this case, the deviation depends on the course velocity VB.
The deviation from the desired course is commensurately greater as the course velocity with which the desired course is described increases. The effect of the deviation of the actual course from the desired course is that, for a constant laser-pulse frequency, an increased number of laser pulses are delivered onto a shortened course segment. This is represented in
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for describing a predetermined or desired course with a beam of particles or waves, in which the deviation of the actual course from the predetermined course is minimized. Accordingly, the present invention provides a method for describing a predetermined/desired course with a beam of particles or waves, in which a movable beam-directing device influences the direction of the beam. The beam is directed by the beam-directing device onto a surface, on which it describes an actual course with the velocity VB. A drive device converts the desired course into a corrected desired course, which describes a diversion in the vicinity of a discrete direction change from a first direction of the desired course to a second direction of the desired course. This diversion is obtained by appending and/or deleting arbitrary sections to/from the desired course. The data of the corrected desired course is translated by the drive device into control instructions for the beam-directing device.
Since the desired course to be described is already known, the novel method of correction of the desired course minimizes the deviations of the actual course from the desired course. Direction changes of the desired course where the desired course has corners are particularly critical for the deviations. In the vicinity of these comers, the actual course can be brought closer to the desired course by incorporating into the desired course diversions which extend outside the comers and compensate substantially for the undesired roundings of the actual course which are represented in FIG. 1. Correction sections which may be straight-line sections are particularly useful, because straight desired courses produce no deviations in the actual course.
In methods for describing a predetermined desired course, in which the actual course is specified with a constant course velocity VB, a straight-line desired course is described as the actual course by the laser beam with a constant delay by the response error time tS, owing to the mechanical inertia of the beam-directing device. The method according to the invention uses the response error time tS as a basis and hence is particularly advantageous. The corrected desired course is obtained from the desired course by adding a first straight-line section of length L, which points in the first direction, at the point of a direction change from a first to a second direction. For the length of this straight-line section: L=VB×tS. Also, a second straight-line section of length L is added at the far end of the first straight-line section from the point of the direction change. The maximum possible course velocity vmax counter to the first direction is specified for this second straight-line section. In this case: vmax>vB. The desired course is accordingly extended for a short distance beyond the point of the direction change. Fast return to the point of the direction change thereupon takes place.
The method according to the present invention can be used particularly advantageously for desired courses, which are curved. In this case, the desired course is approximated with a continuous direction change by a desired course with successive discrete direction changes. The desired course is then corrected according to the method of the present invention.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention a pulsed beam is used. During the structuring of a surface by means of laser beams, a problem that may arise is that an increased laser-pulse density is applied to a shortened actual-course segment owing to the course inaccuracies. This increased laser-pulse density can be avoided by the course correction.
The method according to the present invention is preferably used whenever a laser beam is used as the beam, and a mirror with a galvanometer motor is used as the movable beam-directing device. Indeed, for mirrors with a galvanometer motor, the problem the beam-directing device's mechanical inertia has to date been very noticeable.
The method according to the invention can be used particularly advantageously for processing or modifying a surface, in particular for writing dial plates, or for applying or removing material, for example during laser structuring or doping of semiconductor surfaces by means of ion beams.
Where an ion beam is used as the beam, then it is particularly preferred to use a magnetic lens as the beam-directing device.
The present invention is described in greater detail below with reference to the drawings in which:
The present invention is not to be understood as limited to the embodiments disclosed by way of the examples, hereinabove, but rather is to be understood as entitled to the scope afforded by the following claims.
De Steur, Hubert, Heerman, Marcel
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
7649683, | Jul 16 2004 | Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH | Process for the observation of at least one sample region with a light raster microscope with linear sampling |
8159744, | Jul 18 2006 | Nikon Corporation | Laser scanning apparatus and laser scanning microscope |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3736402, | |||
4317981, | Oct 31 1977 | Method and apparatus for controlling a movable energy source when it is operated to heat the surface of an object | |
4348576, | Jan 12 1979 | MESSER GRIESHEIM GMBH, A COMPANY OF GERMANY | Position regulation of a charge carrier beam |
4918611, | Jul 18 1988 | Transpacific IP Ltd | Method and apparatus for controlling laser cutting by image processing |
5173582, | Oct 31 1989 | Fujitsu Microelectronics Limited | Charged particle beam lithography system and method |
5593606, | Jul 18 1994 | Electro Scientific Industries, Inc | Ultraviolet laser system and method for forming vias in multi-layered targets |
6262425, | Mar 11 1999 | International Business Machines Corporation | Curvilinear axis set-up for charged particle lithography |
DE19544067, | |||
DE19702752, | |||
EP128993, | |||
WO9940473, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 08 2002 | DE STEUR, HUBERT | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012905 | /0120 | |
Jan 10 2002 | HEERMAN, MARCEL | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012905 | /0120 | |
Apr 29 2002 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Aug 16 2005 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Hitachi Via Mechanics, Ltd | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 017152 | /0394 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Mar 27 2007 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Mar 30 2007 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Jun 06 2011 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Oct 28 2011 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 28 2006 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 28 2007 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 28 2007 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 28 2009 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 28 2010 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 28 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 28 2011 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 28 2013 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 28 2014 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 28 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 28 2015 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 28 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |