A high bandwidth, single stage, low power cascode transimpedance amplifier for short haul optical links. In one embodiment, an input signal is fed into the source of a common-gate pmosfet, the output signal is taken at the drain of the common-gate pmosfet, and bias current is supplied by a pmosfet and a nmosfet biased in their triode regions.
|
1. An amplifier comprising:
an input port; an output port; a ground to provide a ground voltage; a power rail to provide a power voltage; a bias circuit to provide a bias voltage between the ground voltage and the power voltage; a common-gate transistor comprising a gate biased by the bias circuit, a source connected to the input port; and a drain connected to the output port; and a pmosfet and a nmosfet to provide bias current to the common-gate transistor, the pmosfet comprising a gate connected to the ground, and a drain; and the nmosfet comprising a gate connected to the power rail, and a drain.
4. A computer system comprising:
a photodetector comprising an output port; and an amplifier comprising: an output port; a ground to provide a ground voltage; a power rail to provide a power voltage; a bias circuit to provide a bias voltage between the ground voltage and the power voltage; a common-gate transistor comprising a gate biased by the bias circuit, a source connected to the photodetector output port; and a drain connected to the amplifier output port; and a pmosfet and a nmosfet to provide bias current to the common-gate transistor, the pmosfet comprising a gate connected to the ground, and a drain; and the nmosfet comprising a gate connected to the power rail, and a drain. 2. The amplifier as set forth in
the common-gate transistor is a pmosfet with its source connected to the drain of the pmosfet, and its drain connected to the drain of the nmosfet.
3. The amplifier as set forth in
the common-gate transistor is a nmosfet with its source connected to the drain of the nmosfet, and its drain connected to the drain of the pmosfet.
5. The computer system as set forth in
the common-gate transistor is a common-gate pmosfet with its source connected to the drain of the pmosfet, and its drain connected to the drain of the nmosfet.
6. The computer system as set forth in
the common-gate transistor is a common-gate nmosfet with its source connected to the drain of the nmosfet, and its drain connected to the drain of the pmosfet.
|
The present invention relates to electronic analog circuits, and more particularly, to transimpedance amplifiers.
With increasing data rates in electronic systems, it is expected that optical interconnects (optical fibers) may in the near future replace wire interconnects at the board-to-board and chip-to-chip level. For example, a computer system such as that illustrated in
In many applications, a photo-detector provides an electrical signal indicative of a received optical signal. A simplified small-signal model for a photo-detector is a small-signal current source, where the small-signal current is representative of the received optical signal. Transimpedance amplifiers provide a small-signal output voltage signal in response to a small-signal input current signal. Many transimpedance amplifiers used in optoelectronic telecommunication applications employ the two popular designs shown in
The photo-detector in
In telecommunication applications, the received optical signals are typically very small due to attenuation in optical fibers, which may be hundreds of kilometers long. Consequently, a primary goal for transimpedance amplifiers for long haul communications is to provide high transimpedance with low noise amplification, while attaining as large a bandwidth as practical.
However, at the board-to-board and chip-to-chip level, such as the computer system of
One drawback is that each stage in the amplifier of
The amplifier of
Consequently, transimpedance amplifiers that are commonly used for long haul communications may not be suitable for short haul optical communications, such as computer systems, where power consumption may be an issue.
A single stage, common-gate transimpedance amplifier according to an embodiment of the present invention is shown at the circuit level in
We follow the usual convention in which the voltages of ground rail 312 and power rail 314 are denoted, respectively, as VSS and VCC . The bias voltage VB is some voltage chosen between VSS and VCC so that pMOSFET 306 is biased in its active region. Only one biasing circuit is required for the amplifier of
It is instructive to consider a small-signal low frequency model for the circuit of
Let ZIN and ZT denote, respectively, the small-signal, low frequency input impedance and transimpedance for the amplifier of
For comparison, consider the case in which the resistances of resistors 408 and 410 are now substantially larger than the resistance of resistor 406. For example, this would be the case in which pMOSFET 308 and nMOSFET 310 were operated in their active regions, or perhaps replaced with high small-signal output impedance current sources. Let z denote this impedance. Making the simplifying assumption that the small-signal drain-source resistances of pMOSFET 308 and nMOSFET 310 are the same order of magnitude, one may approximate the small-signal input impedance as ZIN≈z/(gmrdsc), where rdsc is the small-signal drain-source resistance of common-gate pMOSFET 306. Also under these assumptions, the transimpedance may be approximated as ZT≈z, where recall that z>>rdsc because we have assumed high small-signal output impedance current sources.
Comparing ZIN and ZT for the two cases where pMOSFET 308 and nMOSFET 310 operate in their triode regions, and where these transistors are replaced by a high small-signal output impedance, it is seen that both the small-signal input impedance and transimpedance are less for the former case. Although the above expressions for ZIN and ZT were based upon a simple low frequency model and some simplifying assumptions, they nevertheless suggest that by operating pMOSFET 308 and nMOSFET 310 in their triode regions, a lower small-signal input impedance may be achieved at the expense of a lower transimpedance, compared to the case in which pMOSFET 308 and nMOSFET 310 are operated in their active regions or are replaced by high small-signal output impedance current sources. However, because the embodiment of
The design of amplifier of
Consequently, it is seen from the above discussion that the embodiment of
Another embodiment at the circuit level is provided in
Yet another embodiment of the present invention is provided at the circuit level in
The embodiment of
Simulations for a 0.1 mA small-signal input show that the small-signal transimpedance for an amplifier of the type in
Another embodiment at the circuit level is provided in
Various modifications may be made to the disclosed embodiments without departing form the scope of the invention as claimed below. For example, the amplifier in
Karnik, Tanay, Franca-Neto, Luiz M., Wilson, Timothy M.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
7332971, | Jun 10 2004 | Agency for Science, Technology and Research | Multi-gigabit/s transimpedance amplifier for optical networks |
9184711, | Apr 15 2010 | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Signaling systems, preamplifiers, memory devices and methods |
9559706, | Jul 06 2010 | Altera Corporation | Techniques for phase shifting periodic signals |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4550291, | Oct 03 1983 | Burr-Brown Corporation | Noise-free, die area efficient cascode circuit |
5216386, | Dec 20 1991 | Honeywell Inc. | Transimpedance amplifier |
6125094, | Apr 11 1995 | STMicroelectronics S.A. | Current amplifier |
6424222, | Mar 29 2001 | GCT SEMICONDUCTOR, INC | Variable gain low noise amplifier for a wireless terminal |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Mar 26 2002 | Intel Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
May 10 2002 | WILSON, TIMOTHY M | Intel Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012686 | /0578 | |
May 13 2002 | KARNIK, TANAY | Intel Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012686 | /0578 | |
May 13 2002 | FRANCA-NETO, LUIZ M | Intel Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012686 | /0578 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Sep 16 2005 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Apr 27 2007 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Mar 30 2011 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Apr 15 2015 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 28 2006 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 28 2007 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 28 2007 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 28 2009 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 28 2010 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 28 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 28 2011 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 28 2013 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 28 2014 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 28 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 28 2015 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 28 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |