A method of calculating a precise scanning reference value for a shading correction by dividing a scanning area under a reciprocating scanner into a practical scanning area and a shading correction scanning area. This method includes the steps of: entering a shading correction mode; moving the scan head to the shading correction scanning area; reading a plural number of scanning values in moving within the shading correction scanning area; and calculating the scanning reference value by using said plural number of scanning values.

Patent
   6665093
Priority
Nov 29 1997
Filed
Nov 27 1998
Issued
Dec 16 2003
Expiry
Mar 17 2019
Extension
110 days
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
2
9
EXPIRED
19. A shading correction apparatus, comprising:
a reference panel including an area having a plurality of pixel positions;
a scan head disposed to move to said area of said reference panel, and obtain a plurality of scan values from each of said pixel positions while moving over said reference panel; and
a controller coupled to said scan head to generate a value of a shading correction factor in accordance with said scan values for each of said pixel positions.
1. A method of performing a shading correction for a reciprocating scanner, comprising the steps of:
entering a shading correction mode;
moving a scan head to a reference area having a plurality of pixel positions;
when said reference area is reached by said scan head, obtaining a plurality of scan values from each of said pixel positions while moving the scan head across the reference area; and
determining a value of a shading correction factor from said scan values.
12. A method of performing a shading correction for a reciprocating scanner, comprising the steps of:
entering a shading correction mode;
moving a scan head to a reference area having a plurality of pixel positions;
when said reference area is reached by said scan head, obtaining a plurality of scan values from each of said pixel positions while moving the scan head across the reference area without stopping in the reference area; and
determining a value of a shading correction factor from said scan values.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
said step of moving said scan head to said reference area comprising increasing the speed of said scan head until a predetermined speed is reached; and
said movement of said scan head across the reference area being at said predetermined speed.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprised of using a white panel as said reference area.
4. The method of claim 1, where said determining step comprises performing the average of the scan values other than maximal and minimal of said scan values.
5. The method of claim 1, where said determining step comprises the steps of:
storing said scan values in a memory;
arranging said scan values in said memory in order of size;
eliminating maximal and minimal values of said scan values in said memory; and
averaging remaining scan values stored in said memory.
6. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:
scanning a document with said scan head; and,
determining a corrected document scan value using said shading correction factor.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein said pixel positions are different from each other within said reference area.
8. The method of claim 1, further comprised of moving said scan head across the reference area at least two times in order to obtain said scan values from each of said pixel position.
9. The method of claim 1, further comprised of moving said scan head across the reference area in a first direction while obtaining said scan value from said pixel positions, and moving said scan head across the reference area in a second direction while obtaining a second set of said scan values from said pixel positions.
10. The method of claim 1, further comprised of obtaining at least two sets of said scan values from each of said pixel positions.
11. The method of claim 1, further comprised of obtaining at least three sets of said scan values from each of said pixel positions when said scan head moves across the reference area in three directions.
13. The method of claim 12, further comprising the steps of:
increasing the speed of said scan head until a predetermined speed is reached; and
moving said scan head across the reference area at said predetermined speed.
14. The method of claim 12, further comprising the step of providing a white panel having said reference area.
15. The method of claim 12, further comprising the step of generating said value based on an average of the scan values from each of said pixel positions other than maximal and minimal values of said scan values.
16. The method of claim 12, further comprising the steps of:
storing said scan values obtained from each of said pixel positions in a memory;
arranging said scan values of each of said pixel positions in said memory in order of size;
obtaining remaining scan values by eliminating maximal and minimal values of said scan values from said scan values for each of said pixel positions in said memory; and
averaging the remaining scan values for each of said pixel positions stored in said memory.
17. The method of claim 12, further comprising the steps of:
scanning a document with said scan head; and
determining a corrected document scan value using said shading correction factor.
18. The method of claim 12, further comprised of moving said scan head across the reference area in a first direction while obtaining said scan value from said pixel positions, and moving said scan head across the reference area in a second direction while obtaining a second set of said scan values from said pixel positions.

This application makes reference to, incorporates the same herein, and claims all benefits accruing under 35 U.S.C. §119 from my application entitled SHADING CORRECTION METHOD ON SHUTTLE SCANNING DEVICE filed with the Korean Industrial Property Office on Nov. 29, 1997 and there duly assigned Serial No. 64363/1997 by that Office.

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a method for optical scanning, and more particularly to a method for providing a shading correction for a reciprocating, shuttle scanner.

2. Discussion of Related Art

A shading correction method used in a conventional shuttle scanning device involves reading a value with the scan head in a stopped state after the scan head is moved to a position on a reference white panel. The shading correction method involves using this value at the time of an actual scanning of a document by employing the value as a shading factor, after having scanned through throwing lights at a position located by the white panel.

In the case of a particular method, median filtering is used in order to avoid a shading correction error which can occur through reading a polluted or dirty part of the white panel. This is a method of eliminating spot noises by excluding a maximal value and a minimal value. Further, a method of using an average value, taken after having read the white panel several times, as a factor value is also used to avoid a line movement after a shading correction due to nonuniformity of the shading factor due to white, Gaussian, random noise.

The shuttle scanner operates scanning at a right angle to the feeding direction. When scanning, the scan head is not in an ideal stopped state and so inclination occurs. For this reason, a difference can occur between the scanning state at the time of the reading to determine the shading factor and the scanning state at the time of scanning an actual image area. As a result of this inaccuracy of the shading correction, more errors may occur than in case of not taking an average value.

The shading correction method using the shading factor average value involves taking an average value by reading the shading factor several times with the scan head in a stopped position. Accordingly, this method has a disadvantage of insufficiently reproducing the shading situation when the scan head is actually moving.

Based on my observation of the art, I have found that what is needed is a method of providing a shading correction which avoids the errors associated with the methods of the background art. In particular, I wish to eliminate the problems associated with using a shading factor obtained using a stopped print head for scans obtained using a moving scan head.

It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an improved method for performing a shading correction for a shuttle scanner.

It is a further object to provide a method for providing a precise scanning reference value for use in a shading correction.

It is a yet further object to provide a method for performing a shading correction which prevents incorrect measurement of the shading correction factor.

It is a still further object to provide a method for performing a shading correction which avoids the inaccuracy due to measuring the shading correction factor while the scan head is stopped.

It is a still yet further object to provide a method for performing a shading correction which avoids errors due to dirt on the reference white panel.

It is another object of the present invention to provide a shading correction under condition similar to an actual scanning operation by measuring the shading factor while the scan head is moving.

To achieve these and other advantages and in accordance with the purpose of the present invention, as embodied and broadly described, there is provided a method of calculating a precise scanning reference value for a shading correction by dividing a scanning area under a reciprocating scan head into a practical scanning area and a shading correction scanning area. This method includes the steps of: entering a shading correction mode; moving the scanner to the shading correction scanning area; reading a plural number of scanning values while moving within the shading correction scanning area; and determining the scanning reference value by using said plural number of scanning values.

A more complete appreciation of the invention, and many of the attendant advantages thereof, will be readily apparent as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like reference symbols represent the same or similar components, wherein:

FIG. 1 illustrates a shading correction method in a conventional shuttle scanning device,

FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating a progress process of the shading correction method in accordance with the present invention,

FIG. 3 is an operation embodiment of the shading method in accordance with the present invention,

FIGS. 4A and B are graphs comparing the shading distribution obtained using a scan head in a stopped state and in a moving state, respectively.

Turning now to the drawings, the shading correction method in a conventional shuttle scanning device is illustrated in FIG. 1, where scan head, or scanner, 3 has moved to a position on reference white panel 11. The shading correction method is used at the time of an actual scanning by employing the value as a shading factor after having scanned through throwing lights at a position located by white panel 11.

The present invention is now described in detail in conjunction with the accompanying drawings as follows. FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating the process of performing of the present invention. First, the scanner enters the shading correction mode (Start). Then, the scan head gets driven with increasing speed or with a predetermined speed, process S11, and then is moved until the position occupied by the white panel is reached, process S12. The scan head scans with predetermined speed over the position occupied by the white panel, as shown in FIG. 3. Whereas conventional techniques make the scan head scan, that is obtain readings, while in a stopped state at the location of white panel 21, the present invention has scan head 3 scan, while driving with predetermined speed, at many places of white panel 21. Scan head 3 scans in moving in the left→right then right→left direction with a predetermined speed, as indicated by the arrows in FIG. 3. In FIG. 3, we can see that the white panel of the invention is a little longer than the conventional white panel in order that the scan head can scan white panel 21 while operating with the predetermined speed, process S13.

The scanning value of the white panel according to process S13, as shown in Table 1, forms two-dimensionally disposed information which is stored in any memory place. Table 1, shown below, is an example of such information which is a result taken by the scanner having a length of four pixels, taken at three positions, in process S14.

TABLE 1
first scan second scan third scan
position position position
pixel position (1) 254 251 255
pixel position (2) 254 249 248
pixel position (3) 150 249 245
pixel position (4) 254 248 252

The scanning data stored in memory places for each pixel position are arranged according to the size of the value as shown in Table 2, process S15.

TABLE 2
minimum medium maximum
pixel position (1) 251 254 255
pixel position (2) 248 249 254
pixel position (3) 150 245 249
pixel position (4) 248 252 254

The average value of the values with exception of the minimal value and the maximal value is then determined, so as to be used as a shading factor, process S16. In the example shown, with three scan values measured, there is only one value left after eliminating the minimal and maximal values so this is the value shown in Table 3.

TABLE 3
average value excepting
minimum and maximum
pixel position (1) 254
pixel position (2) 249
pixel position (3) 245
pixel position (4) 252

FIG. 4 is a graph illustrating a shading disposition according to an actual experimental result, where the x axis indicates scanner position and the y axis indicates light quantity. FIG. 4(A) shows a shading disposition when the scan head is in a stopped state according to the conventional technique. FIG. 4(B) shows a shading disposition in a movement of the scanner according to the present invention. FIG. 4(B) illustrates that the method of the present invention prevents the reading of a distortion of the shading factor, that is, an inappropriate shading factor.

As explained above, the present invention can prevent a horizontal line from occurring in an image due to the distortion of the shading factor disposition read with the scan head in the stopped state. Also, the distortion of the shading factor which occurs when the shading panel is dirty can be reduced by the effect of the median filtering.

It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications can be made in the shading correction method a shuttle scanning device of the present invention, without departing from the spirit of the invention. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover such modifications as well as variations thereof, within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.

Lee, Hyuk-Jae

Patent Priority Assignee Title
6996288, Sep 28 2000 Method of calculating shading correction coefficients of imaging systems from non-uniform and unknown calibration standards
8253789, Aug 25 2003 Olympus Corporation Microscopic image capturing apparatus, microscopic image capturing method, and storage medium having a microscope image capturing program stored thereon
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4888492, Mar 03 1987 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image reading apparatus
5099341, Jun 30 1989 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Image reading apparatus with improved shading correction
5237172, Aug 28 1992 HOWTEK, INC Calibrated color scanner with reference level adjustment
5323473, Apr 02 1992 NCR Corporation Method and apparatus for detecting the leading and trailing edges of a document in an image based system
5424537, Aug 13 1990 Howtek, Inc. Calibrated color scanner
5647026, Oct 29 1991 Eastman Kodak Company; EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION Uniformity correction and threshold or halftoning conversion unit and method
5771106, Oct 13 1994 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Shading correcting means for image forming apparatus
5787192, Sep 27 1994 Kabushikaisha Equos Research Image data compression apparatus and image data communication system
5903659, Apr 17 1997 Raytheon Company Adaptive non-uniformity compensation algorithm
///
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Nov 12 1998LEE, HYUK-JAESAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO , LTD ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0096170289 pdf
Nov 27 1998Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Nov 04 2016SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO , LTD S-PRINTING SOLUTION CO , LTD ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0418520125 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Jun 30 2004ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
May 25 2007M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Jan 06 2011ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Jan 06 2011RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned.
May 24 2011M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Jul 24 2015REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Dec 16 2015EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Dec 16 20064 years fee payment window open
Jun 16 20076 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Dec 16 2007patent expiry (for year 4)
Dec 16 20092 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Dec 16 20108 years fee payment window open
Jun 16 20116 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Dec 16 2011patent expiry (for year 8)
Dec 16 20132 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Dec 16 201412 years fee payment window open
Jun 16 20156 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Dec 16 2015patent expiry (for year 12)
Dec 16 20172 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)