Continuously adjustable focusing optics for use in laser-assisted direct metal deposition (DMD™) processes provide for adaptive deposition width to increase deposition rate while maintaining the dimensional tolerances. The focusing optics and method may be adapted for variable deposition road width under closed-loop feedback, so that complicated features may be fabricated with close tolerance, stress and microstructure control to improve the lead-time and design flexibility. The preferred embodiment uses adaptive mirror arrangements and beam movement for variable deposition width and geometry. Conceptually, an infinite number of mirror arrangements can be made to adapt to a particular deposit shape.

Patent
   6710280
Priority
May 22 2001
Filed
May 22 2002
Issued
Mar 23 2004
Expiry
May 22 2022
Assg.orig
Entity
Small
14
8
all paid
1. A system for controlling the build-up of material on a substrate to fabricate an article, comprising:
a memory for storing a description of the article to be fabricated;
a controllable laser outputting a focused beam having a nominal diameter directed at a localized region of the substrate to form a melt pool thereon;
a material feeder for delivering material into the melt pool so as to create a deposit having a physical attribute in accordance with the description of the article; and
one or more adjustable optical elements to modify the diameter of the focused laser beam and wherein at least two of the optical elements are adjustable relative to one another.
2. A system for controlling the build-up of material on a substrate to fabricate an article, comprising:
a memory for storing a description of the article to be fabricated;
a controllable laser outputting a focused beam having a nominal diameter directed at a localized region of the substrate to form a melt pool thereon;
a material feeder for delivering material into the melt pool so as to create a deposit having a physical attribute in accordance with the description of the article; and
one or more adjustable optical elements to modify the diameter of the focused laser beam and wherein the optical elements may be changed during the deposition process to adapt for road width.
5. A system for controlling the build-up of material on a substrate to fabricate an article, comprising:
a memory for storing a description of the article to be fabricated;
a controllable laser outputting a focused beam having a nominal diameter directed at a localized region of the substrate to form a melt pool thereon;
a material feeder for delivering material into the melt pool so as to create a deposit having a physical attribute in accordance with the description of the article;
one or more adjustable optical elements to modify the diameter of the focused laser beam; and
at least one vibrating or oscillating element perpendicular to the beam traverse direction to adapt for road width.
3. A system for controlling the build-up of material on a substrate to fabricate an article, comprising:
a memory for storing a description of the article to be fabricated;
a controllable laser outputting a focused beam having a nominal diameter directed at a localized region of the substrate to form a melt pool thereon;
a material feeder for delivering material into the melt pool so as to create a deposit having a physical attribute in accordance with the description of the article; and
one or more adjustable optical elements to modify the diameter of the focused laser beam wherein the adjustment of the optical elements is stored in conjunction with the description of the article to be fabricated.
4. A system for controlling the build-up of material on a substrate to fabricate an article, comprising:
a memory for storing a description of the article to be fabricated;
a controllable laser outputting a focused beam having a nominal diameter directed at a localized region of the substrate to form a melt pool thereon;
a material feeder for delivering material into the melt pool so as to create a deposit having a physical attribute in accordance with the description of the article; and
one or more adjustable optical elements to modify the diameter of the focused laser beam wherein the optical elements may be used to shape the laser beam in one or more of the following ways:
a) uniform Square Beam with uniform power density,
b) circular beam with Guassian distribution,
c) linear beam perpendicular to the beam traverse path,
d) linear beam in the direction of the beam traverse path, or
e) rectangular beam path.
6. The system of claim 5, wherein the amplitude of the oscillation determines the road width.
7. The system of claim 5, wherein a smaller road width is used during deposition and larger road width is used to relieve stress accumulation.
8. The system of claim 7, wherein the larger road width is used without powder.
9. The system of claim 7, wherein the larger road width is carried out at a reduced power density.

This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/292,581, filed May 22, 2001; the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.

This invention relates generally to rapid manufacturing and, in particular, to the use of focusing optics to control road width and other factors in such processes.

Fabrication of three-dimensional metallic components via layer-by-layer laser cladding was first reported in 1978 by Breinan and Kear. In 1982, U.S. Pat. No. 4,323,756 issued to Brown et al., which describes a method for the production of bulk rapidly solidified metallic articles of near-net shape, finding particular utility in the fabrication of certain gas turbine engine components including discs and knife-edge air seals. According to the disclosure, multiple thin layers of feedstock are deposited using an energy beam to fuse each layer onto a substrate. The energy source employed may be a laser or an electron beam. The feedstock employed in the practice of the invention may be either a wire or powder material, and this feedstock is applied to the substrate in such a fashion that it passes through the laser beam and fuses to the melted portion of the substrate.

Different technologies have since evolved to improve such processes. U.S. Pat. No. 4,724,299 is directed to a laser spray nozzle assembly including a nozzle body with a housing that forms an annular passage. The housing has an opening coaxial with a passageway, permitting a laser beam to pass therethrough. A cladding powder supply system is operably associated with the passage for supplying cladding powder thereto so that the powder exits the opening coaxial with the beam.

Various groups are now working world-wide on different types of layered manufacturing techniques for fabrication of near-net-shape metallic components. In particular, nozzles of the type described above have been integrated with multi-axis, commercially available CNC machines for the fabrication of 3-dimensional components. U.S. Pat. No. 5,837,960 resides in a method and apparatus for forming articles from materials in particulate form. The materials are melted by a laser beam and deposited at points along a tool path to form an article of the desired shape and dimensions. Preferably the tool path and other parameters of the deposition process are established using computer-aided design and manufacturing techniques. A controller comprised of a digital computer directs movement of a deposition zone along the tool path and provides control signals to adjust apparatus functions, such as the speed at which a deposition head which delivers the laser beam and powder to the deposition zone moves along the tool path.

Existing techniques, however, are based on open-loop processes requiring either considerable amount of periodic machining or final machining for close dimensional tolerances. Continuous corrective measures during the manufacturing process are necessary to fabricate net shape functional parts with close tolerances and acceptable residual stress. One exception is the system described in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 5,122,564. This patent, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference, describes a laser-aided, computer-controlled direct-metal deposition, or DMD™, system wherein layers of material are applied to a substrate so as to fabricate an object or to provide a cladding layer.

In contrast to previous methodologies, closed-loop DMD system is equipped with feedback monitoring to control the dimensions and overall geometry of the fabricated article in accordance with a computer-aided design (CAD) description. The deposition tool path is generated by a computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) system for CNC machining, with post-processing software for deposition, instead of software for removal as in conventional CNC machining.

Even with closed-loop DMD, however, corrective measures are often needed in four major areas. These are: dimension (height and width), composition, temperature and residual stress. The later two are primary cause of distortion and cracking. Continuous monitoring and control of height and width ensure close dimensional tolerance of the fabricated component.

The height of the deposit is controlled by an optical feedback loop as described in the '564 patent referenced above. Projecting the image on a linear array detector and continuously counting the illuminated pixels can be used to monitor width of the deposit. The same result may also be obtained by monitoring the video signal used for the visual inspection of the process. Methods to control residual stress are disclosed in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/142,126, filed Jul. 2, 1999, also incorporated herein in its entirety.

In order to maintain close tolerance, deposition rate is somewhat limited to deposit thickness per pass. Although the present deposition rate for closed loop direct metal deposition (DMD) is commercially viable, any increase in the deposition rate and simultaneous deposition of multiple material will significantly reduce the lead-time and increase the design flexibility. There remains an outstanding need therefore to increase the deposit road-width while maintaining the dimensional tolerance to enhance coverage area and volume.

In broad and general terms, this invention provides adjustable focusing optics for use in laser-assisted direct metal deposition (DMD) processes to match beam geometry to deposition feature size and/or characteristics. The focusing optics and method may be adapted for variable deposition road width under closed-loop feedback, so that complicated features may be fabricated with close tolerance, and/or stress and microstructure control to improve lead-time and design flexibility. The preferred embodiments use adaptive mirror arrangements and beam steering for continuously variable deposition width and geometry control. Conceptually, an infinite number of mirror arrangements can be made to adapt to a particular deposit shape.

FIG. 1 illustrates Cassegranian focusing Optics for adaptive beam diameter by relative movement of the two optical elements;

FIG. 2 illustrates adaptive optics for line source;

FIG. 3 shows adaptive optics for square beam with uniform power density;

FIG. 4 shows adaptive optics with combination of mirrors for beam rastering to create a beam shape; and

FIG. 5 shows a flow chart for closed-loop DMD operation with adaptive optics.

This invention provides continuously adjustable focusing optics for use in laser-assisted direct metal deposition (DMD) processes to increase deposition rate while maintaining the dimensional tolerances. The focusing optics and method may be adapted for variable deposition road width under closed-loop feedback, so that complicated features may be fabricated with close tolerance, stress and microstructure control to improve the lead-time and design flexibility. Depending upon the embodiment, the deposition beam may be adjusted in one or more of the following ways:

a) uniform square beam with uniform power density,

b) circular beam with Gaussian distribution,

c) linear beam perpendicular to the beam traverse path,

d) linear beam in the direction of the beam traverse path, and

e) a rectangular beam path.

FIG. 1 is a simplified diagram that illustrates adaptive, Cassegranian focusing optics according to the invention to achieve a variable-deposition road-width for accelerated but accurate deposition during direct-metal deposition (DMD). In this example, the relative position of a concave mirror 102 and conical (or convex) mirror 104 can be changed to vary the diameter of the focused laser beam 110. This enables the closed-loop DMD system to adapt the road-width for the deposit 112 for enhanced deposition rate.

FIG. 2 shows an embodiment involving a combination of two mirrors, including a flat or shaped mirror 202 and cylindrical mirror 204 to direct linesource beam 210, either in the direction of movement or any angle to the direction of movement by modifying the relative position of the mirrors.

FIG. 3 shows how a combination of an integrating mirror 302 and a concave mirror 304 may be used to provide a square beam 310 with uniform power density either in the direction of movement or any angle to the direction of movement by modifying the relative position of the mirrors.

FIG. 4 shows a combination of mirrors, including a beam-redirecting surface 402 and at least one mirror and a computer-controlled movement mirror 404 to produce a 2-D layer of desired shape and path profile 410. Again, by adjusting the relative position of the mirrors road width and intensity distribution can be adapted as needed.

To improve distribution and/or uniformity, the system may incorporate at least one vibrating or oscillating element, preferably perpendicular to the beam traverse direction to adapt for road width. In such configurations, the amplitude of the oscillation may be adjusted to determine the road width. In addition, a smaller road width may be used during deposition and larger road width is used to relieve stress accumulation. The larger road width may be used at a reduced powder density or even without powder.

FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating a typical scenario for the integration of the adaptive optics for the closed loop DM1. The process begins at block 502, entitled CAD/CAM Toolpath for DMD. A question is asked at step 504, namely, whether the road width and beam profile correspond to one another. If not, the relative position of the mirror(s) is changed to match the road width, and control resumes to block 510, wherein deposition is starting using a closed-loop direct-metal deposition (DMD) process.

At step 512, a question is asked whether, after N paths, a new road width should be acquired. If so, the process is transferred to block 514, wherein the mirror is readjusted to match the new road width. If not, control is returned to block 502. If the mirror was readjusted to match a road width and deposition profile, deposition is resumed using the closed-loop DMD process at block 516. If the process is finished, at block 518, the steps are completed at 520. If not, control is returned to block 512.

Mazumder, Jyoti, Morgan, Dwight, Skszek, Timothy

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10071437, Mar 31 2010 Sciaky, Inc. Raster methodology, apparatus and system for electron beam layer manufacturing using closed loop control
10189114, Sep 17 2009 Sciaky, Inc. Electron beam layer manufacturing
10921782, May 24 2017 Relativity Space, Inc. Real-time adaptive control of additive manufacturing processes using machine learning
10946474, Mar 31 2010 Sciaky, Inc. Raster methodology, apparatus and system for electron beam layer manufacturing using closed loop control
11117195, Jul 19 2018 HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP System and process for in-process electron beam profile and location analyses
11344967, Sep 17 2009 Sciaky, Inc. Electron beam layer manufacturing
11532760, May 22 2017 HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP Device for in-situ fabrication process monitoring and feedback control of an electron beam additive manufacturing process
8461474, Mar 31 2010 Sciaky, Inc. Raster methodology, apparatus and system for electron beam layer manufacturing using closed loop control
8546717, Sep 17 2009 SCIAKY, INC Electron beam layer manufacturing
8598523, Nov 13 2009 SCIAKY, INC Electron beam layer manufacturing using scanning electron monitored closed loop control
8809780, Nov 13 2009 SCIAKY, INC Electron beam layer manufacturing using scanning electron monitored closed loop control
8927897, Nov 17 2010 Rolls-Royce Corporation Laser maintenance tool
9174300, Mar 31 2010 SCIAKY, INC Raster methodology, apparatus and system for electron beam layer manufacturing using closed loop control
9399264, Sep 17 2009 Sciaky, Inc. Electron beam layer manufacturing
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4323756, Oct 29 1979 United Technologies Corporation Method for fabricating articles by sequential layer deposition
4724299, Apr 15 1987 Quantum Laser Corporation Laser spray nozzle and method
5122564, Jun 17 1991 Shell Oil Company Melt stabilized polyketone blend containing glass fibers and a tribasic calcium phosphate
5837960, Nov 30 1995 Los Alamos National Security, LLC Laser production of articles from powders
5900170, May 01 1995 United Technologies Corporation Containerless method of producing crack free metallic articles by energy beam deposition with reduced power density
6122564, Jun 30 1998 DM3D Technology, LLC Apparatus and methods for monitoring and controlling multi-layer laser cladding
6518541, Nov 16 1999 Duty cycle stabilization in direct metal deposition (DMD) systems
6526327, Jan 12 1998 University of Central Florida One-step rapid manufacturing of metal and composite parts
////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
May 22 2002The P.O.M. Group(assignment on the face of the patent)
Dec 05 2002MAZUMDER, JYOTITHE P O M GROUPASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0136180214 pdf
Dec 05 2002MAZUMDER, JYOTITHE POM GROUP, INC CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 013618 FRAME 0214 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CORRECTION OF ASSIGNEE NAME FROM THE P O M GROUP TO THE POM GROUP, INC 0319700146 pdf
Dec 05 2002MORGAN, DWIGHTTHE POM GROUP, INC CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 013618 FRAME 0214 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CORRECTION OF ASSIGNEE NAME FROM THE P O M GROUP TO THE POM GROUP, INC 0319700146 pdf
Dec 11 2002SKSZEK, TIMOTHY W THE P O M GROUPASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0136180214 pdf
Dec 11 2002MORGAN, DWIGHTTHE P O M GROUPASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0136180214 pdf
Dec 11 2002SKSZEK, TIMOTHY W THE POM GROUP, INC CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 013618 FRAME 0214 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CORRECTION OF ASSIGNEE NAME FROM THE P O M GROUP TO THE POM GROUP, INC 0319700146 pdf
Dec 31 2012THE POM GROUP, INC DM3D Technology, LLCNUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0319820181 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Oct 01 2007REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Mar 24 2008M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity.
Mar 24 2008M2554: Surcharge for late Payment, Small Entity.
Aug 25 2011M2552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Yr, Small Entity.
Jul 28 2015M2553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Yr, Small Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Mar 23 20074 years fee payment window open
Sep 23 20076 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Mar 23 2008patent expiry (for year 4)
Mar 23 20102 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Mar 23 20118 years fee payment window open
Sep 23 20116 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Mar 23 2012patent expiry (for year 8)
Mar 23 20142 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Mar 23 201512 years fee payment window open
Sep 23 20156 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Mar 23 2016patent expiry (for year 12)
Mar 23 20182 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)