A resilient sanding mechanism is provided for sanding the contours of a working surface, such as an aircraft body. The mechanism comprises an elongate frame having a frame axis, a sander mechanism pivotally engaged to the frame and having a sanding surface disposed distal to the frame. A resilient biasing apparatus is engageable to the sander mechanism and to the frame, for biasing the sander mechanism sanding surface in a predetermined orientation with respect to the frame axis.
|
1. A resilient sanding mechanism for sanding contours of a working surface comprising:
an elongate frame having a frame axis; a sander mechanism pivotally engaged to the frame, the sander mechanism having a sanding surface disposed distal to the frame; and resilient biasing apparatus engageable to the sander mechanism and to the frame, the resilient biasing apparatus being engaged at multiple locations around the sanding mechanism to selectively generate a biasing force in response to pivotal movement of the sanding mechanism for biasing the sanding mechanism sanding surface in a predetermined orientation with respect to the frame axis.
9. A manually operated sanding mechanism for sanding contours of a working surface comprising:
a sander disposable against the work surface; a shaft body; a sander pivotal support apparatus for pivotally engaging the sander to the shaft body; and a sander biasing apparatus engaged to the sander pivotal support apparatus and the shaft body, for resilient engagement therebetween, the sanding biasing apparatus being engaged at multiple locations around the sander pivotal support apparatus to selectively generate a biasing force in response to pivotal movement of the sander pivotal support apparatus to urge the sander to a predetermined orientation relative the shaft body.
2. The sanding mechanism as recited in
3. The sanding mechanism as recited in
4. The sanding mechanism as recited in
5. The sanding mechanism as recited in
6. The sanding mechanism as recited in
7. The sanding mechanism as recited in
8. The sanding mechanism as recited in
10. The mechanism as recited in
11. The apparatus as recited in
12. The apparatus as recited in
13. The apparatus as recited in
14. The apparatus as recited in
16. The sanding mechanism as recited in
17. The apparatus as recited in
|
(Not Applicable)
(Not Applicable)
The present invention relates to sanding devices and, more particularly, to a floating head sanding device useful to provide precision finishes to a product surface.
Sanders have a wide variety of applications extending from everyday home use to aerospace applications for composite technologies, or for use on fiberglass boat holes. Particular types of products and materials may require more of a precision finish to achieve optimum functionality. The size and shape of the product may also dictate types of sanders, the type of finish, etc. Sanding techniques may also very in accordance with the nature of the product, materials or desired finish.
In some cases large products may require the use of automated hand sanders to achieve the desired finish. While the equipment to perform such operations is readily available, the human operation of such equipment, particulary over extended periods, can lead to injuries or disabilities to workers operating such equipment. Where, for example, the surface to be sanded is above the worker, the worker will typically hold the sander above his chest or head, supporting the weight of the sander while pressing the sander against the worker surface. The position weight and vibration of the sander can stress and pressure the worker's body in manner to cause injury over periods of such sanding activity. As many companies recognize a safe and comfortable work environment is not only in the interest of workers, but also in the interest of companies who rely upon those workers to perform skilled or touch work.
Accordingly, there exists a need to devise equipment to facilitate the extended operation of sanders without jeopardizing the health of workers or detracting from their productivity. That need is particularly acute where large product areas are to be sanded, from positions where manual support of the sander may be stressful. p In another embodiment the frame extends to the ground and may be provided with a pivotal frame support member operative to provide ground support to the sanding mechanism.
The frame may be constructed to be resiliently compressible along the length thereof, to mitigate translation of vibration to the worker, and/or to provide a resilient force urging the sander upwardly as it is placed into compression against the working surface.
The sanding mechanism may further be provided with a plurality of handles engageable to the frame at a plurality of locations along the frame. The handles may further be constructed to be rotatably engageable to the frame to facilitate convenient arrangement thereof.
The present invention is described in connection with the illustrated embodiment. As such the structural features and functional attributes of the invention are set forth in connection with the particular construction of sander mechanism, sander biasing apparatus, sander pivotal support apparatus, and sander resilient axial support apparatus. However, as will be recognized by those skilled in the art, the invention may have application to a variety of other types of sander mechanisms, sander support apparatus and apparatus for maintaining a desired orientation of the sander mechanism sanding surface. Where, for example, the surface to be sanded is contoured in an irregular manner, or accessible only from restricted locations, modifications to orienting and supporting components of the invention are anticipated, within the broader aspects of the invention illustrated and described below.
The pivotal support apparatus 17 incorporates a support surface 23, which may be directly engageable to the sander 15, or to a sander support mechanism, such as support mechanism 25, adapted to securely engage and support the sander 15. Power to the sander 15 may be provided by means such as cable 27. Vacuum line 29 may be provided to vacuum particles separated by action of the sanding surface 19 against the working surface 21.
The sanding mechanism 10 may be directed towards the working surface 21 by means of manual manipulation of handle apparatus 31a, 31b. The handle apparatus may be oriented as convenient along the length of the frame 11, and rotatable thereabout by means of retaining fasteners 35a, b, c, extendable through apertures, such as 37a, b, to effectively clamp the handle mechanism at axially spaced locations along the frame 11.
The post 13 may be rigidly secured to a first end portion 37 of frame 11, e.g., by means of screw attachment. Alternatively, the post 13 may be supported by a resilient mechanism (not shown), such as a spring that reciprocates within frame 11, along frame axis 33. In such an embodiment, the post 13, and any supporting structure, is urged outwardly from the frame, and compressible into the frame.
The sander mechanism 15, including such sander support apparatus as may be present, is preferably biased such that the sanding surface is urged towards a predetermined orientation with respect to the frame axis 33. Resilient sander biasing apparatus 39a, b, c, which are implemented as tension springs in the illustrated embodiment, are secured to the sander support mechanism at locations 41a, b, c, respectively. Opposing ends of the springs 39a, b, c, are engageable to the frame 11 via frame coupling member 43, which is secured to a frame 11. The coupling member 43 is translatable about the frame 11 along the frame axis 33. The coupling member 43 may be disposed at a selected location along frame 11 to maintain the desired bias and orientation of sanding surface 19. As the coupling member is drawn downwardly along the frame 11, the biasing force acting on the sanding surface 19 will become greater (stiffer), requiring more force to overcome the predetermined orientation of sanding surface 19. In the presently preferred embodiment the sanding surface 19 is biased to an orientation substantially perpendicular to the frame access 33. Deviation from that orientation, e.g., by moving the sander along the contours of the work surface, generates a reactionary force which urges the sanding surface into engagement with the working surface. Consequently, the user need not manually manipulate the angular orientation of the sander in order to facilitate the force acting to urge the sander against the working surface. The user may simply urge the sanding surface upwardly against the working surface, and move the sanding surface along the working surface, e.g., in an arcuate motion. The angular orientation of the sanding surface with respect to the working surface is effected by pivotal mounting of the sander and the resilient springs urging the sander to return to its normal biased position.
As shown in
As described in connection with the previous embodiments, the embodiment of
Firm, John Charles, Corkill, Kenneth Scott, Roche, Ronald Eugene, Oddo, Ronald Alan, Jones, Coyte Richard
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10933506, | Feb 12 2018 | The Boeing Company | Monopodic sander and method for operating the same |
11867224, | Jan 27 2021 | Black & Decker Inc | Locking mechanism for two telescoping poles of a power tool |
6793568, | Jun 06 2000 | Super Sander Solutions Pty Ltd | Handle for an orbital sander |
7416477, | Mar 10 2006 | Warner Manufacturing Company | Sander tool with pivoting handle and attachable pol |
D556534, | Mar 06 2006 | Warner Manufacturing Company | Sander tool with pivoting handle |
D564325, | Mar 06 2006 | Warner Manufacturing Company | Sander tool |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
2168121, | |||
4731956, | Oct 21 1986 | Advance Machine Company | Floor polishing machine |
5048141, | Apr 03 1989 | JOHNSONDIVERSEY, INC | Floor-cleaning machine with improved brush pressure control |
5333349, | Apr 15 1991 | Apparatus for patching a break in the sidewall of a chimney | |
5481776, | Mar 01 1994 | Brush pressure system | |
5624305, | Jan 30 1996 | Pole mounted vacuum sander | |
5951781, | Mar 17 1998 | Paint scraper and associated method | |
6053805, | Apr 10 1997 | Angelo, Sanchez | Dust free sander |
DE362251, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Aug 07 2002 | CORKHILL, KENNETH SCOTT | Northrop Grumman Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 013739 | /0500 | |
Aug 21 2002 | JONES, COYOTE RICHARD | Northrop Grumman Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 013739 | /0500 | |
Sep 08 2002 | ODDO, RONALD ALAN | Northrop Grumman Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 013739 | /0500 | |
Oct 09 2002 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jan 13 2003 | ROCHE, RONALD EUGENE | Northrop Grumman Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 013739 | /0500 | |
Jan 29 2003 | FIRM, JOHN CHARLES | Northrop Grumman Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 013739 | /0500 | |
Jan 04 2011 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 025597 | /0505 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Oct 22 2007 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Oct 29 2007 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Apr 08 2008 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Sep 23 2011 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Oct 12 2015 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Apr 20 2007 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Oct 20 2007 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 20 2008 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Apr 20 2010 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Apr 20 2011 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Oct 20 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 20 2012 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Apr 20 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Apr 20 2015 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Oct 20 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 20 2016 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Apr 20 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |