A wavelength-selective cross connect switch is disclosed that can selectively pass a multi-wavelength incoming signal received on a given incoming port to a corresponding output port in a bar state; or cross the received signal to an opposite output port in a cross state, using only two wavelength blockers and a number of optical circulators. Power splitters divide the power of each incoming signal in half and the half-power signals are applied to the two wavelength blockers surrounded by corresponding optical circulators. Each of the wavelength blockers control either the bar state or the cross state. The outputs of the two wavelength blockers are combined to produce an output signal at each of the output ports. Thus, the wavelength-selective cross connect can selectively pass or cross an incoming signal to an appropriate output port, as desired. The disclosed wavelength-selective cross connects can be serviced without interrupting traffic. In addition, the disclosed wavelength-selective cross connect requires only shutters, i.e., the wavelength blocker, and is significantly easier to manufacture than a device requiring switches.
|
1. A wavelength-selective cross connect, comprising:
a first wavelength blocker corresponding to a bar state; a second wavelength blocker corresponding to a cross state; a pair of optical circulators surrounding said first wavelength blocker; and a pair of optical circulators surrounding said second wavelength blocker.
10. A wavelength-selective cross connect, comprising:
a first periodic planar wavelength blocker corresponding to a bar state; a second periodic planar wavelength blocker corresponding to a cross state; a pair of optical circulators surrounding said first wavelength blocker; and a pair of optical circulators surrounding said second wavelength blocker.
17. A method for switching an input wavelength-division multiplexed signal received on an input port comprising n wavelength channels, said method comprising the steps of:
selectively passing said wavelength-division multiplexed signal to a corresponding output port using a first wavelength blocker in a bar state; selectively crossing said wavelength-division multiplexed signal to an opposite output port using a second wavelength blocker in a cross state; surrounding said first wavelength blocker with a pair of optical circulators; and surrounding said second wavelength blocker with a pair of optical circulators.
2. The wavelength-selective cross connect according to
3. The wavelength-selective cross connect according to
4. The wavelength-selective cross connect according to
5. The wavelength-selective cross connect according to
6. The wavelength-selective cross connect according to
7. The wavelength-selective cross connect according to
8. The wavelength-selective cross connect according to
9. The wavelength-selective cross connect according to
11. The wavelength-selective cross connect according to
12. The wavelength-selective cross connect according to
13. The wavelength-selective cross connect according to
14. The wavelength-selective cross connect according to
15. The wavelength-selective cross connect according to
16. The wavelength-selective cross connect according to
18. The method according to
19. The method according to
20. The method according to
|
The present invention relates to optical communication networks and, more particularly, to optical devices for routing multi-wavelength optical signals.
When multiple users share a transmission medium, some form of multiplexing is required to provide separable user sub-channels. There are many multiplexing techniques available that simultaneously transmit information signals within the available bandwidth, while still maintaining the quality and intelligibility that are required for a given application. Optical communication systems, for example, increasingly employ wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) techniques to transmit multiple information signals on the same fiber, and differentiate each user sub-channel by modulating it with a unique wavelength of invisible light. WDM techniques are being used to meet the increasing demands for increasing speed and bandwidth in optical transmission applications.
In optical communication networks, such as those employing WDM techniques, individual optical signals are often selectively routed to different destinations. Thus, a high capacity matrix or wavelength selective cross-connect (WSC) switch is often employed to selectively route signals through interconnected nodes in a communication network. Many wavelength selective cross-connect switches used in optical communication networks are either manual or electronic, requiring multiple optical-to-electrical and electrical-to-optical conversions. The speed and bandwidth advantages associated with transmitting information in optical form, however, makes an all-optical network the preferred solution for WDM-based optical networks. Moreover, all-optical network elements are needed to provide the flexibility for managing bandwidth at the optical layer (e.g., on a wavelength by wavelength basis).
One problem with the current design of wavelength selective cross-connect switches is that to service the WSC, both fiber optic lines must be broken. As the demand for optical bandwidth increases in WDM communication systems, it is desirable to increase the number of channels. The number of wavelength channels in commercial fiber optic line systems, for example, now typically exceeds one hundred channels. Unfortunately, an increase in the number of channels provides a corresponding increase in the size, cost and insertion loss of the optical devices in such WDM communication systems. More specifically, filters that can handle all the channels independently with wide, flat bands become very large and difficult to make with high yields, regardless of the technology. A need therefore exists for an improved wavelength selective cross-connect switch that permits serviceability without traffic interruption in an efficient manner. A further need exists for an improved wavelength selective cross-connect switch that uses a periodic filter design to tradeoff flexibility for greater device simplicity.
Generally, a wavelength-selective cross connect switch is disclosed that can selectively pass a multi-wavelength incoming signal received on a given incoming port to a corresponding output port in a bar state; or cross the received signal to an opposite output port in a cross state. The wavelength-selective cross connect is fabricated using only two wavelength blockers and a number of optical circulators.
Power splitters divide the power of each incoming signal in half and the half-power signals are applied to the two wavelength blockers surrounded by corresponding optical circulators. Each of the wavelength blockers control either the bar state or the cross state. The outputs of the two wavelength blockers are combined to produce an output signal at each of the output ports. Thus, the wavelength-selective cross connect can selectively pass or cross an incoming signal to an appropriate output port, as desired.
The disclosed wavelength-selective cross connects can be serviced without interrupting traffic. For instance, suppose one of the wavelength blockers needs to be replaced. The network can be configured so that all of the channels are in the bar state. Then the blocker can be removed without interrupting any traffic. Another main advantage of the present invention is that a device that requires only shutters, i.e., the wavelength blocker, is significantly easier to make than a device requiring switches, such as typical WSCs.
A more complete understanding of the present invention, as well as further features and advantages of the present invention, will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description and drawings.
In addition, the wavelength-selective cross connect 100 of
As shown in
The wavelength blockers 230-1 and 230-2 may each be embodied, for example, as any wavelength blocking device, such as the periodic planar wavelength blockers disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/798,501, filed Mar. 2, 2001, entitled "A Wavelength Filter That Operates On Sets of Wavelength Channels," or contemporaneously filed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/809,124, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,504,970 entitled "Planar Lightwave Wavelength Blocker," filed Mar. 15, 2001, each assigned to the assignee of the present invention and incorporated by reference herein. An exemplary wavelength blocker 300 is discussed further below in conjunction with FIG. 3. The exemplary wavelength blocker 300 is a silica planar waveguide with thermo-optic phase shifters because of the potential for large-volume manufacturability, and because it is natural in waveguides to make a high-order grating, suitable for a periodic filter. The periodicity of the filter makes the device much smaller, with lower loss, and lower power consumption, at the expense of channel-control flexibility.
In addition, the wavelength-selective cross connect 200 of
In this manner, the wavelength-selective cross connect 200 can selectively pass or cross an incoming signal to an appropriate output port, as desired. Thus, while 2×2 broadcast-and-select switches, such as the wavelength-selective cross connect 100 shown in
Another advantage of the present invention is that the optical devices can be serviced without interrupting traffic. For instance, suppose the second blocker 230-2 needs to be replaced. One can set up the network so that all of the channels are in the bar state. Then the second blocker 230-2 can be removed without interrupting any traffic. Another main advantage is that a device that requires only shutters, the blocker, is significantly easier to make than one requiring switches, the conventional WSC. For example, a blocker needs no waveguide crossings. Other advantages include the fact that the filter spectral response can be the same for both the bar and cross states, aiding the cascadability; and one can multicast for the purpose of, for example, 1+1 protection. 1+1 protection is the transmitting of two copies of a signal, each on a separate path, for the purpose of signal-loss protection in case one path fails.
The exemplary periodic wavelength blocker 300 supports 128 channels (λ1 λ2 . . . λ128) separated into 16 sets, each set containing 8 channels. Thus, demultiplexer 301 produces 16 demultiplexer output signals, each of which has 8 channels. In one embodiment, each wavelength channel from the demultiplixer 301 is carried by two equal length waveguides, WG. The two Mach-Zehnder switches associated with the two equal-length waveguides carrying the same demultiplexer output signal work in concert to pass or block the demultiplexer output signal. For a more detailed discussion of this multiple equal-length waveguides per signal arrangement, see U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/798,501, filed Mar. 2, 2001, entitled "A Wavelength Filter That Operates On Sets of Wavelength Channels," incorporated by reference herein above. Among other benefits, this multiple equal-length waveguides per signal arrangement provides individual passbands having a flat frequency spectrum for each channel and the entire response is completely flat when no channels are dropped or added. It can be shown that the exemplary wavelength blocker 200 has a resulting length of about 9.5 cm in typical silica waveguides.
For example, the equal-length waveguides WG1 and WG2 carry a demultiplexer output signal of 8 channels (λ1, λ17, λ33, λ49, λ65, λ81, λ97, λ113) and the equal-length waveguides WG31 and WG32 carry a demultiplexer output signal of another 8 channels (λ16, λ32, λ48, λ64, λ80, λ96, λ112, λ128). It is noted that although the exemplary wavelength blocker 300 is illustrated with two waveguides per channel, additional equal-length waveguides per signal can be employed.
The present invention recognizes that a wavelength blocker 300 does not need to give access to the dropped channels. Thus, the wavelength blocker 300 in accordance with the present invention employs a transmissive design with evenly distributed lens arms. It is noted that prior techniques configured the waveguide lens in a reflective fashion in order to access the drop channels. See, C. R. Doerr et al., "40-Wavelength Add-Drop Filter," IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., Vol. 11, 1437-1439 (1999). When configured in a reflective fashion, the polishing angle and flatness of the reflective facet is generally inaccurate enough to cause large phase differences between adjacent lens arms. In addition, the lens waveguides of a reflective wavelength blocker are arranged in pairs, in order to give room for the waveguides containing the drop channels to reach the facet between the mirror stripes that reflect back the lens waveguides for the express channels, making the environments for adjacent lens waveguides different, resulting in different birefringences for each lens arm. Also, most likely because the waveguide core sidewalls are typically somewhat slanted, there is polarization conversion in the bends and adjacent lens arms curve in different directions at certain points. Thus, the polarization dependence of the reflective grating-lens-grating is generally more than 1 dB, making it unusable for most long-haul systems.
It is to be understood that the embodiments and variations shown and described herein are merely illustrative of the principles of this invention and that various modifications may be implemented by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
11733468, | Dec 08 2021 | VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC.; Viavi Solutions Inc | Photonic structure using optical heater |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5915051, | Jan 21 1997 | MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECHNOLOGY | Wavelength-selective optical add/drop switch |
6504970, | Mar 15 2001 | Lucent Technologies Inc | Planar lightwave wavelength blocker |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Mar 15 2001 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Apr 19 2001 | DOERR, CHRISTOPHER RICHARD | Lucent Technologies Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 011945 | /0603 | |
Jan 30 2013 | Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc | CREDIT SUISSE AG | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 030510 | /0627 | |
Aug 19 2014 | CREDIT SUISSE AG | Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 033950 | /0001 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jun 13 2007 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Sep 26 2007 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Sep 22 2011 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Nov 27 2015 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Apr 20 2016 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Apr 20 2007 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Oct 20 2007 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 20 2008 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Apr 20 2010 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Apr 20 2011 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Oct 20 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 20 2012 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Apr 20 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Apr 20 2015 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Oct 20 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 20 2016 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Apr 20 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |