The invention relates to a method for establishing an operating variable to be determined of a motor vehicle in dependence on a first known operating variable and a second known operating variable, using a characteristics map for executing functions of the motor vehicle. Said characteristics map is stored in the cartesian coordinate system in an electronic control device with the help of interpolating points. If a mathematically invertible characteristics map by which means an operating variable to be determined for a first motor vehicle function is entered on the Z-axis is provided, then by reverse interpolation using the same characteristics map, an operating variable allocated to the Y- or X-axis can also be an operating variable to be determined for a second motor vehicle function, the operating variable allocated to the Z-axis being the known operating variable for the second motor vehicle.
|
3. A method for determining motor vehicle operating variables that are to be determined as a function of first and second known operating variables using a characteristic diagram stored in a cartesian coordinate system with the aid of interpolation points in an electronic control unit, the method comprising the acts of:
using a mathematically invertible characteristic diagram for motor vehicle functions, stored in the cartesian coordinate system for determining an operating variable for a first motor vehicle function that is on the Z-axis, for determining an operating variable for a second motor vehicle function allocated to the Y- or X-axis using reverse interpolation of said stored mathematically invertible characteristic diagram, in which the operating variable on the Z-axis functions as one of said first and second known operating variables; wherein one and the same characteristic diagram is stored in the electronic control unit for determining the operating variable for the first and second motor vehicle functions.
1. A method for determining a motor vehicle operating variable to be determined as a function of a first known operating variable and a second known operating variable, the method comprising the acts of:
accessing a mathematically invertible characteristic diagram for motor vehicle functions stored via support points in a cartesian coordinate system in an electronic control unit, by which mathematically invertible characteristic diagram an operating variable to be determined for a first motor vehicle function is entered on a Z-axis of the cartesian coordinate system; reverse interpolating said mathematically invertible characteristic diagram such that an operating variable allocated to the Y- or X-axis becomes an operating variable to be determined for a second motor vehicle function, said operating variable allocated to the Z-axis becoming one of the first or second known operating variables for determining the second motor vehicle function; wherein one and the same characteristic diagram is stored in the electronic control unit for determining the operating variable for the first and second motor vehicle functions.
2. The method according to
|
The invention relates to a method for determining a motor vehicle operating variable that is to be determined.
A method of this type is known, from the technical handbook "Autoelektrik, Autoelektronik am Otto-Motor", Robert Bosch GmbH, 1994 particularly in connection with electronic control units for executing internal-combustion engine functions. In this technical handbook, for example, a characteristic diagram is illustrated on Page 163 (Illustration 2), by which the advance angle is determined as a function of the rotational speed and the load as known operating variables. A characteristic diagram is illustrated on Page 165 (Illustration 6), by which the closing angle is defined for controlling an ignition coil as a function of the rotational speed and the battery voltage as known operating variables.
In principle, the surface of such a characteristic diagram in the Cartesian coordinate system (X, Y, Z axes) consists of a network of support points. Four support points respectively form a rectangular surface element in the space. The lines of the rectangular surface element in the space extend in parallel to the X-axis and Y-axis. In order to create such a regular structure of the support points or of the surface of the characteristic diagram consisting of rectangles, the support points or the characteristic diagram data may only partially be based on real measured values. If measured values are determined which do not correspond directly to the supporting points of a characteristic diagram, the pertaining values in the Z direction are determined by means of linear interpolation.
The characteristic diagrams required for motor vehicle functions are formed experimentally and are stored in an electronic control unit for the internal-combustion control, which is required anyhow. For each dependence, a characteristic diagram is stored: Z=f (X, Y).
Normally, the operating variable to be determined is assigned to the Z-axis. The operating variable assigned to the X-axis and the Y-axis, respectively, are first and second operating quantities in the form of input quantities, particularly measuring signals. A characteristic diagram of this type is normally stored for a defined motor vehicle function. Although frequently the same operating variables are processed for additional motor vehicle functions, for example, the operating variable assigned to the Z-axis can now be known, but the operating variable assigned to the X-axis or the Y-axis may have to be determined; that is, one of the input variables of a characteristic diagram can become the output variable, but the output variable of a characteristic diagram can become the input variable. In the case of the method according to the prior art, a separate characteristic diagram was stored for each of these cases, in which case the operating variable to be determined is always assigned to the Z-axis. As a result, high application expenditures and an immense storage space demand are created.
It is an object of the present invention to improve a process of the above-mentioned type such that the application expenditures as well as the storage space demand are reduced.
This object is achieved by a method for determining a motor vehicle operating variable to be determined (M; tL) as a function of a first known operating variable (n; M) and of a second known operating variable (tL; n) using a characteristic diagram stored by means of support points in the Cartesian system of coordinates (X, Y, Z axes) in the electronic control unit, for carrying out motor vehicle functions. When a mathematically invertible characteristic diagram is present, by means of which, for a first motor vehicle function, an operating variable (M) to be determined is entered on the Z axis, for a second motor vehicle function, by means of reverse interpolation by the same characteristic diagram, an operating variable (tL) to be assigned to the Y axis or X axis may also be a operating variable to be determined when, for the second motor vehicle function, the operating variable (M) assigned to the Z axis is the known operating variable.
The use of one and the same characteristic diagram is essential to the invention, irrespective of to which axis of the coordinate system the output quantity is assigned as the operating variable to be determined. If the operating variable to be determined corresponds to the operating variable assigned to the Z-axis, the conventional approach is used. However, if the operating variable assigned to the Z-axis becomes the known operating variable, a reverse interpolation of the characteristic diagram takes place. The prerequisite is a mathematical invertibility of the characteristic diagram; that is, the characteristic diagram must extend monotonically in the X-direction and/or in the Y-direction.
As a result of the method according to the invention, the error probability is also reduced by decreasing manual expenditures.
The drawing illustrates an embodiment of the invention.
In
If a characteristic diagram according to FIG. 1 and
In the example according to the state of the art in
With respect to the two motor vehicle functions,
Thus, instead of two characteristic diagrams, only one characteristic diagram must be stored in the example according to
Kraemer, Gerd, Ebeling, Karl-Heinz
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
8301351, | Jul 10 2007 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Gear shift system for vehicle, control method and control device for automatic transmission |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5887568, | Jul 12 1996 | NISSAN MOTOR CO , LTD | Controller and control method for engine ignition timing |
5925086, | Aug 13 1996 | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd | Vehicular automatic transmission and apparatus and method for controlling gear shift thereof |
5967125, | May 20 1997 | Denso Corporation | Air/fuel ratio control device for internal combustion engine |
6007452, | Jul 11 1997 | NISSAN MOTOR CO , LTD | Line pressure control system for continuously variable transmission accounting for input load changes caused by inertia during shifting |
6009851, | May 16 1995 | Mitsubishi Jidosha Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Idle speed control apparatus for an internal combustion engine |
6122577, | Sep 07 1996 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Device and method to monitor sensors in vehicles |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Aug 08 2000 | EBELING, KARL-HEINZ | Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 011031 | /0194 | |
Aug 08 2000 | KRAEMER, GERD | Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 011031 | /0194 | |
Aug 11 2000 | Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Dec 18 2007 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Nov 17 2011 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Nov 30 2015 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jun 22 2007 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Dec 22 2007 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 22 2008 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jun 22 2010 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jun 22 2011 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Dec 22 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 22 2012 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jun 22 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jun 22 2015 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Dec 22 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 22 2016 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jun 22 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |