An ingot is placed below parallel wires of a multiwire saw, and the wires are driven to run. The ingot is moved upward and cut by the wires to obtain wafers. The wires are displaced toward one side of cut surfaces of the wafers. By lowering the wafers as the wires remains displaced toward the one side of cut surfaces of the wafers, the wires are pulled out of the wafers without contacting the other side cut surfaces of the wafers. Thus, the multiwire saw does not cause any damage to major surfaces of the wafers and is used many times without cutting the wires.
|
1. A machining method using a multiwire saw for obtaining a plurality of cut objects by cutting a fixed workpiece with a multiwire saw having a plurality of parallel wires, comprising:
a step of cutting the workpiece with the parallel wires of the multiwire saw under a sprinkle of abrasive solution which includes abrasive grains, thereby obtaining the cut objects with each cut object having two cut surfaces; a step of relatively displacing each one of the parallel wires toward one side of the respective two cut surfaces of each of the cut objects; and a step of separating the multiwire saw from the cut objects as each one of the parallel wires remain displaced toward solely the one side of the respective two cut surfaces of each of the cut objects.
2. The machining method using a multiwire saw according to
a quantity L by which the parallel wires of the multiwire saw are displaced toward the one side of the two cut surfaces of each of the cut objects meets the following conditions:
where w is a cutting margin and d is a wire diameter.
3. The machining method using a multiwire saw according to
the abrasive grains have a grain size of #2000 or more according to JIS-R6001 so that cutting process damage on the workpiece is reduced.
4. The machining method using a multiwire saw according to
the abrasive grains have a grain size of #3000 to #6000 according to JIS-R6001.
|
The present invention relates to a machining method using a multiwire saw having a plurality of parallel wires. More specifically, the invention relates to a machining method using a multiwire saw, by which when only one of front and rear surfaces of a wafer or the like is required to be good at machining accuracy, continuous machining process is achieved with high efficiency while maintaining the machining accuracy of the one surface.
Conventionally, the multiwire saw has advantages that the cutting process is achieved with less cutting margins as compared with ID saws (Inside Diameter saws) and that the multiwire saw is superior to the ID saws in machining ability because of capability of carrying out a plurality of cuttings at the same time.
On the other hand, the multiwire saw has a defect of poorer machining accuracy as compared with the ID saws. In particular, because cutting process with the multiwire saw is performed with less cutting margins, the distance between cut objects and the wires is so narrow that the wires may come into contact with cut surfaces of the cut objects during the withdrawal of the wires from the cut objects. This contact may cause the cut surfaces to be flawed, which accounts for a defect of the multiwire saw.
In particular, in the case of a narrow distance between the wires, as shown in
In the prior art, therefore, it has been practiced to take a method that the wires are cut upon completion of cutting of the workpiece in order to prevent the cut surface from being flawed when the multiwire saw is separated from the cut objects.
However, with this method in which the wires are pulled out from the cut object by cutting the wires of the multiwire saw, the wires need to be replaced with new ones each time the workpiece has been cut, which may cause cost of wires to be increased and cause operating cycle time of the multiwire saw to be prolonged.
Further, because the wires abruptly lose the tension at the time of cutting the wires, ends of the wires may pop into contact with the cut surfaces of the cut objects in pulling our the wires even with careful work, which may cause the cut surfaces to be flawed.
An object of the present invention is to provide a machining method using a multiwire saw which does not cause any damage to major cut surfaces of cut objects and which can be used a plurality of times without cutting wires of a multiwire saw.
In order to achieve the above object, according to the present invention, there is provided a machining method using a multiwire saw for obtaining a plurality of cut objects by cutting a fixed workpiece with a multiwire saw having a plurality of parallel wires, comprising: a step of cutting the workpiece with the parallel wires of the multiwire saw under a sprinkle of abrasive solution including abrasive grains, thereby obtaining the cut objects; a step of relatively displacing the wires toward one side of cut surfaces of the cut objects; and a step of separating the multiwire saw from the cut objects as the wires remains displaced toward the one side of the cut surfaces of the cut objects.
With this constitution, the fixed workpiece is cut with the multiwire saw having the plurality of parallel wires, by which a plurality of cut objects are obtained. Thereafter, the plurality of wires are displaced toward one side of cut surfaces of the cut objects, or the workpiece is displaced, and then the multiwire saw is separated from the plurality of cut objects. Since the multiwire saw is pulled out after displacing the plurality of wires or after displacing the workpiece toward one side of cut surfaces of the cut objects, the multiwire saw is separated from the plurality of cut objects without causing the wires to contact the cut surfaces opposing the one side of cut surfaces of the cut objects. Therefore, even if the one side cut surfaces of the cut objects are damaged, the other side cut surfaces are not damaged. Further, the wires of the multiwire saw are not cut each time the workpiece has been cut, as has been involved in the prior art, so that the operating cycle time is shortened and the cost is reduced.
In an embodiment of the present invention, a quantity L by which the wires of the multiwire saw are displaced toward the one side of the cut surfaces of the cut objects meets the following condition: L≧(w-d)/2 where w is a cutting margin and d is a wire diameter.
With this constitution, the wires of the multiwire saw never damage the cut surfaces opposing the one side of the cut surfaces by contacting the one side cut surfaces of the cut objects. Also the wires are separated from the cut objects without causing plastic deformation of the cut objects.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the abrasive grains have a grain size of #2000 or more according to JIS-R6001 so that cutting process damage on the workpiece is reduced.
With this constitution, since abrasive grains having a small grain size of #2000 or more, damage remaining in the cut workpiece is reduced, and the cutting margin is also reduced.
In an embodiment of the present invention, the abrasive grains have a grain size of #3000 to #6000 according to JIS-R6001.
With this constitution, since the abrasive grains have a grain size of #3000 to #6000, damage remaining in the cut workpiece is reduced, and the cutting margin is also reduced. Moreover, the workpiece is cut without lowering the machining efficiency.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given hereinbelow and the accompanying drawings which are given by way of illustration only, and thus are not limitative of the present invention, and wherein:
Hereinbelow, the present invention is described in detail by way of embodiments thereof illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
The cutting of the ingot 1 by the multiwire saw 2 and pullout of the wires 2a are carried out as follows.
First, after the ingot 1 is stuck on and fixed to the mount 3, the stage 6 is moved in the positive direction of z-axis, so that the ingot 1 is located below the wires 2a as shown in FIG. 1. Next, by actuating the multiwire saw 2, the wires 2a are driven in the positive or negative direction of x-axis. Then, by moving the stage 6 in the positive direction of y-axis, the ingot 1 is cut by the wires 2a, so that the wafers 1a are formed as shown in
At the time when the ingot 1 is cut into the wafers 1a, the wires 2a have penetrated into the mount 3. Next, in the state that the wires 2a have penetrated into the mount 3 as shown in
where w is the cutting margin and d is the wire diameter.
Next, as the mount 3 remains shifted in the positive direction of z-axis, the stage 6 is moved in the negative direction of y-axis, and thereby the wires 2a are pulled out from the wafers 1a.
When the wires 2a are pulled out from the wafers 1a in this way, the wires 2a indeed may damage one side cut surfaces 7 of the wafers 1a, yet never damage the other-side cut surfaces 8 as shown in FIG. 3. That is, the wires 2a never damage the cut surfaces 8, i.e., {111}B planes of the wafers 1a.
When the wires 2a are pulled out from the wafers 1a, the wires 2a make contact with the cut surfaces 7, i.e., {111}A planes of the wafers 1a. However, since the shift amount L of the mount 3 has been set as described above, such a force as can cause the wafers 1a to be plastically deformed does not act on the cut surfaces 7. Also, the cut surfaces 7 is less often required to be good at surface machining accuracy as much as the cut surfaces 8 as described below, and therefore this contact of the wires 2a with the cut surfaces 7 never matters.
Further, the wires 2a of the multiwire saw 2 are not cut each time the ingot 1 is cut. Therefore, the cut surfaces are never damaged due to pops of the wires 2a, the operating cycle time is shortened, and the wires 2a do not need to be replaced, contributing to a reduction in cost.
The {111} plane of a compound semiconductor having a zinc-blende structure comprises a {111}A plane and a {111}B plane, and when cut out by a plane normal to the <111> bearing, the {111} plane necessarily results in one {111}A plane and the other {111}B plane. These planes are different in properties from each other, and so, generally, discriminated in device production. For example, when a GaP single crystal ingot grown in the <111> bearing by LEC technique is cut into wafers with a multiwire saw, epitaxial growth is commonly applied to the {111}B plane. Also, even if two cut surfaces are equivalent to each other like the {100} plane, it is not the case, generally, to demand equal machining accuracy to the two cut surfaces in device formation. For example, when a GaAs single crystal ingot grown by HB (Horizontal Bridgman) method is cut into wafers so that the {100} plane is obtained, it is often the case that an arbitrarily determined one surface is polished for use of epitaxial growth while the other plane is shipped as sliced. This is because it is not necessary for the plane that is not used for epitaxial growth that the plane be as flat as the plane used for epitaxial growth and that the cutting damage layer be removed.
As shown above, it is often the case that wafers to be cut by a multiwire saw are not required to machined at equal machining accuracy on both sides, and the present invention is particularly useful for such cases.
In addition, how much larger L should be set than (w-d)/2 depends greatly on wire tension, fragility of wafers, abrasive grain size and distance between fixed ends of wires.
Further, in this embodiment, the movement of the wires relative to the mount has been executed to a quantity of L before the start of pullout of the wires. However, if the deformation amount of wafers is larger or if the elasticity of wafers is larger, the wires may be pulled out from the wafers by displacing the mount continuously in the positive or negative direction of z-axis in such a way that the wires do not contact one side cut surfaces of the wafers, in linkage with the motion of the mount in the negative direction of y-axis.
The invention being thus described, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not be regarded as a departure from the sprit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of the following claims.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
8844511, | Feb 10 2010 | Siltronic AG | Method for slicing a multiplicity of wafers from a crystal composed of semiconductor material |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5715806, | Dec 15 1994 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Multi-wire saw device for slicing a semi-conductor ingot into wafers with a cassette for housing wafers sliced therefrom, and slicing method using the same |
6135103, | Dec 08 1997 | Tokyo Seimitsu Co., Ltd. | Wire saw for slicing brittle materials with an ingot loading and unloading mechanism |
6178962, | Aug 27 1998 | Hitachi Cable, LTD | Saw wire assembly, cutting method utilizing the same, and system therefor |
6234159, | Sep 11 1997 | Siltronic AG | Wire saw and process for cutting off shaped articles |
6381830, | Sep 01 1998 | Hitachi Metals, Ltd | Method for cutting rare earth alloy, method for manufacturing rare earth alloy plates and method for manufacturing rare earth alloy magnets using wire saw, and voice coil motor |
JP1044141, | |||
JP87272, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Feb 25 2000 | IKEHARA, MASAHIRO | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010630 | /0268 | |
Mar 09 2000 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jun 21 2006 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Dec 31 2007 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Mar 05 2012 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Jul 20 2012 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jul 20 2007 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jan 20 2008 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 20 2008 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jul 20 2010 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jul 20 2011 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jan 20 2012 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 20 2012 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jul 20 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jul 20 2015 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jan 20 2016 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 20 2016 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jul 20 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |