A method and system controls multiple tv tuners to allow a user to watch live video at high quality based on a video capture level independent of a video capture quality used to record playback video. The method and system provides an independent tv tuner from which to capture video that will be replayed wherein the capture quality of the video from the tuner will be independent from the quality other tuner. Accordingly, an delayed video stream can have a lower capture quality setting without affecting the capture quality of primary video being viewed by a user.
|
1. A multi-television tuner system comprising:
a first tuner; a second tuner; a common controller, operatively coupled to both the first and second tuner, to control the first tuner to receive first incoming signals for a first channel, control the second tuner to receive second incoming signals associated with the first channel or a second channel; selecting one of the first and second tuners for controlled playback and the other tuner for non-controlled playback, and provide an independent capture quality for video received with the first tuner and video received with the second tuner; and memory operatively coupled to digitally store video received from a selected one of the first and second tuner for controlled playback.
13. A method for controlling at least a first tv tuner and a second tv tuner comprising the steps of:
receiving, by a first tv tuner, first incoming signals for a first channel; capturing the incoming signals for the first channel at a first capture quality setting; receiving, by a second tv tuner, second incoming signals for the first channel or a second channel; digitally capturing, at least a portion of the second incoming signals received by the second tv tuner at a different capture quality; determining, in response to replay activation, a current channel of each tuner and controlling both tuners to receive a same channel; and displaying at least a portion of the second incoming signals on a same or different display screen.
6. A multi-television tuner system comprising:
a first tuner; a second tuner; a processing device operatively coupled to the first and second tuners; and memory containing instructions that when executed by the processing device cause the processing device to: control the first tuner to receive first incoming signals at a first capture quality for the first incoming signals for the first channel; control the second tuner to receive second incoming signals associated with the first channel or a second channel; control capturing of at least a portion of the second incoming signals received by the second tuner at a different capture quality in response to obtaining channel identification information associated with each of the first and second tuners. 18. A multi-television tuner system comprising:
a first tuner; a second tuner; a common controller, operatively coupled to both the first and second tuner, to control the first tuner to receive first incoming signals for a first channel, control the second tuner to receive second incoming signals associated with the first channel or a second channel; and provide an independent capture quality for video received with the first tuner and video received with the second tuner; memory operatively coupled to digitally store video received from a selected one of the first and second tuner for controlled playback; and wherein the common controller, in response to replay activation, determines a current channel of each tuner and controls both tuners to receive a same channel.
19. A multi-television tuner system comprising:
a first tuner; a second tuner; a common controller, operatively coupled to both the first and second tuner, to control the first tuner to receive first incoming signals for a first channel, control the second tuner to receive second incoming signals associated with the first channel or a second channel; and provide an independent capture quality for video received with the first tuner and video received with the second tuner; memory operatively coupled to digitally store video received from a selected one of the first and second tuner for controlled playback; and wherein the common controller monitors channels on the first and second tuners and programs the other tuner to receive a same channel as the first tuner in response to a start replay command.
2. The system of
3. The system of
4. The system of
5. The system of
7. The system of
8. The system of
9. The system of
10. The system of
11. The system of
12. The system of
14. The method of
15. The method of
16. The method of
17. The method of
|
This is a related application to co-pending application entitled "METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MULTI-TV TUNER DISPLAY OF VIDEO INFORMATION", filed on Feb. 28, 2000, having the same inventors Komar et al., Ser. No. 09/514,836 and owned by instant assignee.
The invention relates generally to methods and apparatus for displaying video and more particularly to methods and apparatus for displaying video employing multiple TV tuners.
Multimedia systems may employ a single TV tuner that may be employed as part of a graphics processing system. For example, a combination graphics processing and TV tuner may allow the display of an incoming TV information from satellite or cable television input or other video source to be overlaid on graphics information on a screen hooked up to a computer. Such systems can allow selection of capture quality so that a single decoder captures all video at a selected capture resolution. However, where a viewer is watching television on a such a screen and would like to watch portions of two television shows that are on the air at the same time, the viewer typically has to decide which program the viewer would like to see displayed on a display device since the TV tuner can only receive a single channel and display the single channel. Also, where the viewer would like watch a program on one channel and generate their own replay for the same channel or a different channel, a single tuner system typically would record the video for replay at a same quality level as the quality of the live video area. This can greatly tax the performance and processing abilities of such systems.
In addition, there are single TV tuner systems known that can provide the detection of key words based closed caption data to monitor a current channel and put a TV image in the background and bring the TV image into the foreground when the key word or phrase is detected. Accordingly, "hot words" are an information pattern that is entered by a user and are compared with the incoming source stream. Recording can be started based on the key words detection in the single channel. However, such systems do not typically provide multi-channel detection and typically require a viewer to manually switch to a different channel through the single tuner when a different program is desired. This solution is inconvenient if the user wants to watch or capture segments of two programs that are on at the same time since "hot words" can only typically be used to monitor the current channel.
Dual TV tuner systems are known that may be included, for example, in a television system. Such television systems do not typically offer multimedia capabilities including video graphics processing. However, such conventional dual tuner televisions typically provide a picture within a picture option but typically do not allow the delayed viewing of one program. Also, where a picture in a picture mode is used, this can distract the user who is wishing to detect when a particular program or other information is provided because the viewer must divide their attention between two channels.
In addition, combination television and VCR's are known. In such a system, typically the TV includes one TV tuner and the VCR includes another TV tuner but the VCR provides analog recording. Also, such systems typically use separate control devices for each of the tuners and do not typically allow the user to view the captured video while capturing. A user must typically wait until the tape is finished and rewind the tape.
It would be desirable if a viewer watching delayed and live video could simultaneously watch both video streams at independent capture quality levels from one another. Conventionally, delayed video is recorded at a lower capture quality setting. In a single tuner configuration this also reduces the quality of the live video stream since the same quality setting is typically required for both the live video and recorded video.
It would also be desirable if a viewer could watch video received on one channel while simultaneously recording video from the same channel or another channel while keeping the quality of the primary channel being watched unaffected.
In one tuner system, one solution may be to capture (and record) the video stream at the highest possible quality setting for delayed video as with the live video and then downscaling the video using a suitable downscale, for example, using a graphics processor or other suitable circuit. However, recording high quality video requires increased processing and storage space.
Accordingly, a need exists for a video display apparatus and method that can overcome one or more of the above problems.
The invention will be more readily understood with reference to the following drawings wherein:
Briefly, a method and system uses multiple TV tuners and allows independent capture quality of live video and replay video. The method and system provides an independent TV tuner from which to capture video that will be replayed wherein the decoder capture quality of the video from one tuner will be independent from the decoder capture quality of the other tuner. Accordingly, a delayed video stream can have a lower capture quality setting without affecting the capture quality of primary video being viewed by a user.
In one embodiment, a multi-television tuner system includes a first tuner, a second tuner, and a common controller that provides an independent capture quality for video received from the first tuner and video received from the second tuner. Memory is included that is used to digitally store video received from a selected one of the first and second tuner for controlled playback. The dual TV tuner system may be, for example, a set top TV appliance, computer system, or other device that provides a plurality of TV tuners in a same system.
The TV tuners 12 and 14 may be any suitable TV tuners that may receive digital or analog video and audio information for display on display 22 and vertical blanking interval (VBI) information (e.g., closed captioning or parental control). Where the first and second TV tuners 12 and 14 are analog TV tuners, they include, as known in the art, decoders 13 and 15 to perform digital to analog conversion and to output captured digital data 24 and 26 to respective buffers 17 and 19. The buffers may be, for example, system memory or if desired, frame buffer memory.
The first TV tuner 12 is operatively coupled to receive incoming signal 28, such as incoming video information from a television signal source in digital or analog form. If the incoming signal is digital information, the TV tuner decoder decompresses the information and/or performs a YUV format conversion if necessary. The first TV tuner 12 is operatively coupled to receive incoming signals for a first channel. As used herein, the term "channel" may include any suitable frequency or code or any other suitable delineation used to distinguish among channel containing differing video information. The second TV tuner 14 is also operatively coupled to receive the incoming signal 28 and is tuned for a second and different channel. Accordingly, the first TV tuner is tuned to receive a first channel, and the second TV tuner 14 is controlled to receive a second and different channel. Channel control of the TV tuners 12 and 14 is performed by common controller 16 via channel control data 30 and 32, respectively. The common controller 16 is operatively coupled to both the first and second tuners to provide this information so that it can control the first tune 12 to receive first incoming signals for a first channel and to control the second tuner 14 to receive second incoming signals associated with the first channel or a second channel. The common controller 16 provides an independent display quality for video received from the first tuner in comparison with video received with the second tuner.
Memory 18 is operatively coupled to digitally store video received from a selected one of the first and second tuners for controlled playback. As such, the memory 18 includes a playback buffer that may store, for example, a playback file 34. Memory 18 may be, for example, the system memory or frame buffer memory so that the playback file 34 may be suitably stored wherever selected.
Switch 20 is controlled by the common controller 16 via control signal 33 to switch, for example, the digital video 24 to be stored, for example, for replay in a playback file 34 or to output the digital video 24 as a display view 37 for viewing on the display 22. Although control of the channel selection is made through channel select commands 30 and 32, it will be recognized that any other suitable channel select control mechanism to control TV tuners 12 and 14 may also be used.
The common controller 16 controls the capture quality independently for each of the decoders 13 and 15. Capture quality setting information 36 and 38 may be, for example, a setting indicating that the decoder should capture the video at a 320×240 resolution, or HDTV level resolution, or any other suitable capture resolution. The common controller 16 may be, for example, one or more suitably programmed microprocessors, DSPs, discrete logic, state machines or any other suitable hardware, software, or suitable combination thereof to perform the described operations.
For purpose of illustration, in this example, the decoder 13 of TV tuner 12 has a higher capture quality setting 36 than the capture quality setting for decoder 15. The incoming signals received by tuner 12 will be considered the primary video or, for example, live video, whereas the incoming channel set for TV tuner 14 is the channel from which delayed video is recorded for playback and is considered the secondary tuner (these may be the same channels). However, it will be recognized that each tuner may be selected as a primary tuner or a secondary tuner.
In addition, the capture quality settings information 36 and 38 may be predetermined so that tuner 12 always has a higher capture quality setting so that the common controller 16 can suitably control each tuner through the channel control commands 30 and 32 so that either tuner can be used to capture playback information, for example, if playback information is desired at a higher capture quality than, for example, live video. However, preferably, delayed video or playback video is typically recorded at a lower capture resolution to reduce the processing demands on the common controller 16 or graphics processing devices.
As shown, overlay engine 40 may suitably downscale and overlay one of two views 37 or 39 captured from the decoders 13 and 15 to the display 22 so that, for example, the same show may be watched while, for example, playback or replay is being shown as an overlaid view.
The overlay engine 40 may be any suitable overlay engine as known in the art such as part of a 3D graphics processor, to overlay, for example, video and graphics information or two videos, if desired. The overlay engine as known in the art can upscale or downscale images as desired for placement and viewing in the display 22. The display resolution for each view is therefore affected by the overlay engine. Capture resolution of the decoders 13 and 15 may be different from the display resolution of each of the respective views depending upon the desired overlay configuration. The overlay engine 40 may also be incorporated as part of the common controller 16 if desired.
Where the capture quality for each decoder (i.e., each tuner) is not preprogrammed, the system 10 may provide, for example, a user interrace so that a user may enter quality factors 44 and 46 to define the desired decoder capture quality for each of the tuners 12 and 14. For example, an interface may allow quality factors that include, for example, capture size and capture duration on a per tuner basis. The common controller 16 then defines the allowable memory space in the buffers 17 and 19 to reflect the capture quality setting as determined by the quality factors. The quality factors may be stored, for example, in suitable tuner registers.
The common controller 16 commonly controls the first tuner 12 based on a selectable first capture quality setting 36 that may be derived, for example, from the input capture quality factors 44. The common controller 16 also controls the second tuner 14 at an independent selectable capture quality setting. The video received from the first tuner is captured at a first quality level simultaneously with video received from the second tuner which is captured at a second and independent capture quality level. Accordingly, the common controller 16 allows the decoders 13 an 15 to digitally capture video simultaneously at differing capture quality settings. As such, the common controller 16 provides independent display quality for video received from the first tuner and video received with the second tuner.
The common controller 16 also determines a current channel of each tuner and controls both tuners to receive the same channel in response to a replay activation signal 47 received, for example, through a remote control device. For example, where a viewer is watching live video via tuner 12, the common controller 16 controls both tuners 12 and 14 to receive the same channel so that the second tuner 14 can store captured video, for example, at an independent capture quality level as a playback file 34 so that the viewer can continue, for example, to view the same program while also reviewing a replay of the same program. Alternatively, the TV tuners 12 and 14 may be tuned to different channels so the viewer may be viewing live video from one channel, for example, and tuner 2 is programmed to receive a different channel from which the playback may be desired. Accordingly, the common controller 16 controls digital capturing by obtaining status and other information on the first and second tuners to record from a same or different channel. Status information may be, for example, the current channel to which each tuner is programmed. The other information may be from a selected channel viewer or remote control or other suitable source indicating the desired channel from which a replay segment is desired. The playback buffer is monitored by the common controller 16 to obtain playback status information 45 for the user, such as the time that the delayed video program occurred, or any other suitable information.
Where a start replay command is received, such as the playback select command 46, the common controller 16 monitors the channels prior to this time on the first and second tuners and programs the other tuner to receive the same channel as the first tuner so that the replay of a currently live program is readily obtained at a different capture quality as determined by the capture quality factors 44 and 46.
Referring to
At step 206, the method includes digitally capturing the second incoming signal at a different capture quality based on either the quality factor 44 or a preprogrammed capture quality setting. As shown in block 208, the method includes recording for playback, such as in playback file 34, the second incoming signals. As shown in block 210, the method includes displaying the recorded second incoming signals on the same or different display screen along with the first incoming signals so that simultaneous display of a live video and a recorded playback is provided.
Accordingly, based on the above methodology, the method includes determining, in response to replay activation, a current channel of each tuner controlling both tuners to receive a same channel. The method also includes controlling a capturing of video by obtaining status and other information on each of the tuners to record from a same or different channel if, for example, the controller receives other control information indicating, for example, that the user desires to record from a channel other than that being received by tuner 12. This may be via a different input (not shown). Through the user interface, the method includes prompting to receive data indicating capture file size and capture duration and using the per tuner capture quality settings to set a different capture quality level for each of the tuners.
As shown in block 406, the method includes prompting for and receiving playback window size data for the playback window such as view 39 that will be used by the overlay engine to suitably size the playback window on the display 22. Information may be suitably stored for use by the overlay engine in control registers as known in the art of graphics processing, or in any suitable location. As shown in block 408, the method includes, after configuration and detection of replay activation, determining, by the common controller, the channel of the active tuner, such as TV tuner 12. As shown in block 410, if the common controller is selected to record from the same channel as the channel being viewed, the common controller commands the second tuner 14 to the same channel as the active tuner 12. As shown in block 412, the replay buffer is then initialized to accept decoded video from decoder buffer 19. As shown in block 414, the method includes setting the overlay engine downscaling to set a replay window size. As shown in block 416, the method includes creating the view of the replay window based on the configuration settings, such as by the overlay engine 40. As shown in block 418, the method includes capturing the video from the second tuner and in block 420, playing back the playback file 34 at the specified playback delay, specified, for example, in step 404.
If, however, the highest quality tuner is not tuned to the desired channel, the method includes, as shown in block 508, switching tuners by tuning both tuners to the same channel and switching out the best tuner to record on the desired channel so that the user may, for example, continue to watch a program although watching it with a different tuner than originally being used. As shown in block 510, the method includes configuring a recording tuner to the selected quality setting if, for example, the capture quality has changed. As shown in block 512, the method includes capturing the video and recording it as the playback file.
As described herein, a plurality of tuners are provided with differing capture quality for the respective decoders. The selectability of the capture quality may be done, for example, through a user interface or, for example, the capture quality may be preset on a per tuner basis. If preset on a per tuner basis, for example, the system and method may automatically switch tuners to the tuner having the higher capture quality for recording content, if desired. The low capture quality may also be used for recording video to reduce process loading. Other advantages will be recognized by those of ordinary skill in the art.
It should be understood that the implementation of other variations and modifications of the invention in its various aspects will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, and that the invention is not limited by the specific embodiments described. For example, more than two tuners may be used. Also, the common controller and overlay engine can be implemented as a graphic processor. It is therefore contemplated to cover by the present invention, any and all modifications, variations, or equivalents that fall within the spirit and scope of the basic underlying principles disclosed and claimed herein.
Arora, Jitesh, Mate, Elena, Komar, Anton V.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10028006, | Dec 31 2013 | DISH TECHNOLOGIES L L C | Transponder loss and join-in-progress channel monitoring |
10028026, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | System for addressing on-demand TV program content on TV services platform of a digital TV services provider |
10028027, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | System for addressing on-demand TV program content on TV services platform of a digital TV services provider |
10045084, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Video-on-demand content delivery system for providing video-on-demand services to TV service subscribers |
10057649, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Video-on-demand content delivery system for providing video-on-demand services to TV service subscribers |
10063934, | Nov 25 2008 | Rovi Technologies Corporation | Reducing unicast session duration with restart TV |
10075746, | Jul 14 1998 | Rovi Guides, Inc; TV GUIDE, INC ; UV CORP | Client-server based interactive television guide with server recording |
10129597, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Video-on-demand content delivery method for providing video-on-demand services to TV service subscribers |
10129598, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Video-on-demand content delivery system for providing video-on-demand services to TV services subscribers |
10149015, | Jun 26 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
10154296, | Jun 26 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
10264303, | Jun 26 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
10277937, | Jun 26 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
10306321, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Video-on-demand content delivery system for providing video-on-demand services to TV service subscribers |
10341699, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | System for addressing on-demand TV program content on TV services platform of a digital TV services provider |
10341730, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Video-on-demand content delivery system for providing video-on-demand services to TV service subscribers |
10349100, | Mar 12 2007 | BROADBAND ITV, INC | Method for addressing on-demand TV program content on TV services platform of a digital TV services provider |
10349101, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | System for addressing on-demand TV program content on TV services platform of a digital TV services provider |
10375428, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | System for addressing on-demand TV program content on TV services platform of a digital TV services provider |
10412439, | Sep 24 2002 | Thomson Licensing | PVR channel and PVR IPG information |
10491954, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Video-on-demand content delivery method for providing video-on-demand services to TV service subscribers |
10491955, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Video-on-demand content delivery system for providing video-on-demand services to TV services subscribers |
10506269, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | System for addressing on-demand TV program content on TV services platform of a digital TV services provider |
10536750, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Video-on-demand content delivery system for providing video-on-demand services to TV service subscribers |
10536751, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Video-on-demand content delivery system for providing video-on-demand services to TV service subscribers |
10555014, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | System for addressing on-demand TV program content on TV services platform of a digital TV services provider |
10560733, | Jun 26 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
10567846, | Jun 26 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
10582243, | Jun 26 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
10623793, | Jun 26 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
10694256, | Mar 09 2007 | Rovi Technologies Corporation | Media content search results ranked by popularity |
10785517, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Method for addressing on-demand TV program content on TV services platform of a digital TV services provider |
10791351, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | System for addressing on-demand TV program content on TV services platform of a digital TV services provider |
10893334, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Video-on-demand content delivery method for providing video-on-demand services to TV service subscribers |
10931986, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | System for addressing on-demand TV program content on TV services platform of a digital TV services provider |
10951927, | Feb 21 2001 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for interactive program guides with personal video recording features |
10984037, | Mar 06 2006 | Veveo, Inc. | Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content on a first system based on user preferences learned on a second system |
11218752, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | System for addressing on-demand TV program content on TV services platform of a digital TV services provider |
11218757, | Jun 26 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
11245942, | Mar 12 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Method for addressing on-demand TV program content on TV services platform of a digital TV services provider |
11252459, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | System for addressing on-demand TV program content on TV services platform of a digital TV services provider |
11252476, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Video-on-demand content delivery system for providing video-on-demand services to TV service subscribers |
11259059, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | System for addressing on-demand TV program content on TV services platform of a digital TV services provider |
11259060, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | System for addressing on-demand TV program content on TV services platform of a digital TV services provider |
11259089, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Video-on-demand content delivery method for providing video-on-demand services to TV service subscribers |
11265589, | Jun 26 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
11272233, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | System for addressing on-demand TV program content on TV services platform of a digital TV services provider |
11272235, | Jun 26 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
11277669, | Jun 26 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
11290763, | Jun 26 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
11516525, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | System for addressing on-demand TV program content on TV services platform of a digital TV services provider |
11570500, | Jun 26 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
11570521, | Jun 26 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
11582498, | Jun 26 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
11589093, | Mar 12 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | System for addressing on-demand TV program content on TV services platform of a digital TV services provider |
11601697, | Mar 12 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | System for addressing on-demand TV program content on TV services platform of a digital TV services provider |
11695976, | Jun 26 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
7385649, | Apr 14 2003 | Sony Corporation | Video display apparatus and method |
7409140, | May 11 2001 | SYNAMEDIA LIMITED | Channel buffering and display management system for multi-tuner set-top box |
7522219, | Jun 06 2001 | INTERDIGITAL MADISON PATENT HOLDINGS | Video signal processing system with auxiliary information processing capability |
7570871, | Nov 12 2002 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Continue recording channel feature for personal video recorder |
7925141, | Apr 17 1998 | SYNCHVIEW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | Systems and methods for storing a plurality of video streams on re-writable random-access media and time- and channel-based retrieval thereof |
7962011, | Dec 06 2001 | Cisco Technology, Inc | Controlling substantially constant buffer capacity for personal video recording with consistent user interface of available disk space |
8457475, | Feb 21 2001 | Rovi Guides, Inc; TV GUIDE, INC ; UV CORP | Systems and methods for interactive program guides with personal video recording features |
8528032, | Jul 14 1998 | UV CORP ; TV GUIDE, INC ; Rovi Guides, Inc | Client-server based interactive television program guide system with remote server recording |
8565578, | Dec 06 2001 | MAGNOLIA LICENSING LLC | Dividing and managing time-shift buffering into program specific segments based on defined durations |
8577201, | May 11 2001 | SYNAMEDIA LIMITED | Buffering of prior displayed television channels upon accessing a different channel |
8620135, | Dec 06 2001 | TECH 5 SAS | Selection and retention of buffered media content |
8694396, | Dec 26 2007 | Rovi Guides, Inc | Systems and methods for episodic advertisement tracking |
8768147, | Feb 21 2001 | UV CORP ; TV GUIDE, INC ; Rovi Guides, Inc | Systems and methods for interactive program guides with personal video recording features |
8776126, | Jul 14 1998 | UV CORP ; TV GUIDE, INC ; Rovi Guides, Inc | Client-server based interactive television guide with server recording |
8806533, | Oct 08 2004 | UNITED VIDEO PROPERTIES, INC | System and method for using television information codes |
8806536, | Mar 04 1998 | Rovi Guides, Inc; TV GUIDE, INC ; UV CORP | Program guide system with preference profiles |
8831531, | Nov 17 2011 | EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. | Systems and methods for measuring a signal quality between an entertainment device and a remote control |
8984554, | Nov 19 2010 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Hybrid tuner control |
8995818, | Oct 29 2007 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Recorder apparatus |
9015736, | Dec 29 2005 | UV CORP ; TV GUIDE, INC ; Rovi Guides, Inc | Systems and methods for episode tracking in an interactive media environment |
9021538, | Jul 14 1998 | UV CORP ; TV GUIDE, INC ; Rovi Guides, Inc | Client-server based interactive guide with server recording |
9055318, | Jul 14 1998 | UV CORP ; TV GUIDE, INC ; Rovi Guides, Inc | Client-server based interactive guide with server storage |
9055319, | Jul 14 1998 | UV CORP ; TV GUIDE, INC ; Rovi Guides, Inc | Interactive guide with recording |
9055322, | Feb 21 2001 | UV CORP ; Rovi Guides, Inc; TV GUIDE, INC | Systems and methods for interactive program guides with personal video recording features |
9071872, | Jan 30 2003 | UV CORP ; TV GUIDE, INC ; Rovi Guides, Inc | Interactive television systems with digital video recording and adjustable reminders |
9075861, | Mar 06 2006 | VEVEO LLC | Methods and systems for segmenting relative user preferences into fine-grain and coarse-grain collections |
9092503, | Mar 06 2006 | Veveo, Inc. | Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on dynamically identifying microgenres associated with the content |
9118948, | Jul 14 1998 | UV CORP ; TV GUIDE, INC ; Rovi Guides, Inc | Client-server based interactive guide with server recording |
9125169, | Dec 23 2011 | UV CORP ; TV GUIDE, INC ; Rovi Guides, Inc | Methods and systems for performing actions based on location-based rules |
9128987, | Mar 06 2006 | Veveo, Inc. | Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on a comparison of preference signatures from multiple users |
9154843, | Jul 14 1998 | TV GUIDE, INC ; UV CORP ; Rovi Guides, Inc | Client-server based interactive guide with server recording |
9166714, | Sep 11 2009 | Veveo, Inc | Method of and system for presenting enriched video viewing analytics |
9191722, | Dec 19 1996 | Rovi Guides, Inc | System and method for modifying advertisement responsive to EPG information |
9226006, | Jul 14 1998 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Client-server based interactive guide with server recording |
9232254, | Jul 14 1998 | Rovi Guides, Inc; TV GUIDE, INC ; UV CORP | Client-server based interactive television guide with server recording |
9264656, | Feb 26 2014 | Rovi Guides, Inc; TV GUIDE, INC ; UV CORP | Systems and methods for managing storage space |
9294799, | Oct 11 2000 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing storage of data on servers in an on-demand media delivery system |
9319733, | Dec 06 2001 | Cisco Technology, Inc | Management of buffer capacity for video recording and time shift operations |
9319735, | Jun 07 1995 | UV CORP ; TV GUIDE, INC ; Rovi Guides, Inc | Electronic television program guide schedule system and method with data feed access |
9326025, | Mar 09 2007 | Rovi Technologies Corporation | Media content search results ranked by popularity |
9369741, | Jan 30 2003 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Interactive television systems with digital video recording and adjustable reminders |
9426509, | Aug 21 1998 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Client-server electronic program guide |
9648358, | Feb 21 2001 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for interactive program guides with personal video recording features |
9736524, | Jan 06 2011 | Veveo, Inc. | Methods of and systems for content search based on environment sampling |
9749693, | Mar 24 2006 | Rovi Guides, Inc; TV GUIDE, INC ; UV CORP | Interactive media guidance application with intelligent navigation and display features |
9866909, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Video-on-demand content delivery system for providing video-on-demand services to TV service subscribers |
9866910, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Video-on-demand content delivery system for providing video-on-demand services to TV service subscribers |
9888287, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Video-on-demand content delivery system for providing video-on-demand services to TV services subscribers |
9888288, | Jun 26 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
9894417, | Jun 26 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
9894419, | Jun 26 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
9930374, | Feb 21 2001 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for interactive program guides with personal video recording features |
9936240, | Jun 26 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
9973825, | Jun 26 2007 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
9998791, | Jul 30 2004 | Broadband iTV, Inc. | Video-on-demand content delivery method for providing video-on-demand services to TV service subscribers |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4808992, | May 08 1987 | RCA LICENSING CORPORATION, TWO INDEPENDENCE WAY, PRINCETON, NJ 08540, A CORP OF DE | Component audio/video system with automatic turn-off of peripheral devices |
5371551, | Oct 29 1992 | LOGAN, BERNICE C , TRUSTEE OF THE JAMES D LOGAN AND KERRY M LOGAN FAMILY TRUST | Time delayed digital video system using concurrent recording and playback |
6018612, | Oct 19 1992 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Arrangement for storing an information signal in a memory and for retrieving the information signal from said memory |
6115341, | Feb 17 1997 | Sony Corporation | Digital signal recording method and apparatus and digital signal reproduction method and apparatus |
6285408, | Apr 09 1998 | LG Electronics Inc. | Digital audio/video system and method integrates the operations of several digital devices into one simplified system |
WO9222983, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Oct 16 2000 | KOMAR, ANTON V | ATI International SRL | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 011236 | /0459 | |
Oct 16 2000 | ARORA, JITESH | ATI International SRL | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 011236 | /0459 | |
Oct 16 2000 | MATE, ELENA | ATI International SRL | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 011236 | /0459 | |
Oct 19 2000 | ATI International SRL | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Nov 18 2009 | ATI International SRL | ATI Technologies ULC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023574 | /0593 | |
Sep 25 2015 | ATI Technologies ULC | ADVANCED SILICON TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 036703 | /0421 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Dec 31 2007 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Sep 23 2011 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Jan 06 2016 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jul 20 2007 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jan 20 2008 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 20 2008 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jul 20 2010 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jul 20 2011 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jan 20 2012 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 20 2012 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jul 20 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jul 20 2015 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jan 20 2016 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 20 2016 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jul 20 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |