A method for exchanging messages between computer systems communicatively coupled in a computer system network. A message (e.g., a read or write command) is sent from a software element of a first computer system (e.g., a client computer system) to a second computer system (e.g., a server computer system). A shared memory unit is accessible by the software element of the first computer system and a software element of the second computer system. The shared memory unit of the second computer system is directly accessed, bypassing the processor of the second computer system, and the data of interest is read or written from/to the shared memory unit. In one embodiment, the method pertains to acknowledgments between software elements. A plurality of messages is sent from one software element to another software element. A count of each of the plurality of messages is maintained. An acknowledgment message acknowledging receipt of a prescribed number of the messages is written to a shared memory unit when the count reaches the prescribed number.
|
1. A method for exchanging messages between computer systems communicatively coupled in a computer system network, said method comprising the steps of:
generating a message from a software element of a first computer system; placing said message by said software element of the first computer system in a location of a memory unit shared by said first computer system and a second computer system without receiving any memory allocation for the memory unit from the second computer system; determining whether said message is destined for a software element of said second computer system; retrieving said message from said location in said shared memory unit by said software element of said second computer system in response to said message being destined for said software element of said second computer system, said software element of said first computer system and said software element of said second computer system operable to directly access said shared memory unit for placement and retrieval of said message.
15. A method for acknowledging messages between a first software element and a second software element using a shared memory unit, said method comprising the steps of:
sending messages from said first software element to said shared memory unit and destined for said second software element without requiring any memory allocation control from said second software element; maintaining a count of a number of messages sent by said first software element to said shared memory unit; retrieving messages from said shared memory unit by said second software element writing an acknowledgment message from said second software element to said shared memory unit directly accessible by said first software element and by said second software element when said count reaches a prescribed number, said acknowledgment message from said second software element acknowledging retrieval of said prescribed number of messages from said shared memory unit generated by said first software element; retrieving said acknowledgment message from said shared memory unit by said first software element.
2. The method of
writing data to said shared memory unit in response to said message being a write command; and updating a lookup table to indicate a presence of said data in said shared memory unit and to identify a memory location of said data.
3. The method of
setting a bit flag to indicate a presence of said data in said shared memory unit.
4. The method of
5. The method of
receiving said message at said network adapter; forwarding said message to a network hardware component coupled to said network adapter; and forwarding said message from said network hardware component to one of a plurality of shared memory units.
8. The method of
9. The method of
using said lookup table to determine whether data is in said shared memory unit in response to said message being a read command.
10. The method of
sending messages from said second software element to said first software element; maintaining a count of a number of said messages sent by said second software element to said first software element; and writing an acknowledgment message from said first software element to said shared memory unit when said count reaches a prescribed number, said acknowledgment message from said first software element acknowledging receipt of said prescribed number of messages from said second software element.
11. The method of
initializing a credit value in said shared memory unit; and incrementing said credit value for each of said messages sent by said second software element.
12. The method of
writing said acknowledgment message from said first software element to said shared memory unit when said credit value reaches a prescribed value.
14. The method of
16. The method of
initializing a credit value in said shared memory unit; and incrementing said credit value for each of said messages sent by said first software element.
17. The method of
writing said acknowledgment message from said second software element to said shared memory unit when said credit value reaches a prescribed value.
18. The method of
19. The method of
20. The method of
21. The method of
22. The method of
copying said acknowledgment message written by said second software element from said shared memory unit to a second memory unit.
|
The present invention pertains to the field of computer system architecture. More specifically, the present invention pertains to a method for using shared memory to facilitate message exchanges and data transfer in a computer system or in a network of computer systems.
A typical computer system utilizes a variety of software elements such as an operating system, device drivers, application programs ("applications") including computer software programs, word processors, database management systems, electronic mail, and the like, and communication programs that execute communication protocols that define the procedures to be followed when data are transmitted and received.
The software elements in a computer system, and the software elements on different computer systems, use data packets to communicate with each other and exchange information. Sending and receiving is accomplished using software processes such as applications, threads, drivers, protocol stacks, and the like. In the prior art, software is involved at both ends of any message exchange or data transmission, whether it is a one-way exchange (for example, from one computer system to another), two-way (for example, from one computer system to another and back again), and so on. For example, a source software element sends data packets to a target software element in order to issue requests and commands, such as a command to execute a particular application. In response to these requests and commands, the target software element sends an acknowledgment data packet ("acknowledgment") to the source software element to indicate that the request or command was properly received, as well as responses to the requests and commands.
The focus of this discussion of the prior art is not the data processing accomplished by the software, but rather the involvement of the software in the data/message exchanges. The problem with these kinds of exchanges (with software elements involved at each end of the exchange) is that they consume processing cycles and memory resources in the computer systems involved in the exchange. In addition, the exchanges can only be accomplished at the rate at which the software can handle the data/message.
By way of exemplifying the problems with the prior art, consider the current process for sending and receiving acknowledgments in response to requests and commands. Prior Art
One of the software elements (e.g., from application layer A 10) of computer system 80a transmits to computer system 80b a data packet (e.g., message 90) containing, for example, a command or request. Computer system 80b responds to message 90 in the form of acknowledgment 95. Typically, a prescribed number of messages are sent by the source software element before an acknowledgment is provided by the target software element. For example, ten (10) messages may be sent from the source software element (e.g., from application layer A 10) before an acknowledgment is required from the target software element (e.g., from application layer B 60). The source software element will not transmit any further messages until it receives an acknowledgment. After receiving an acknowledgment, the source software element transmits another 10 messages.
In the prior art, message 90 is placed in a buffer (e.g., message queue B 22) of computer system 80b before it is eventually forwarded to application layer B 60, and similarly acknowledgment 95 is placed in a buffer (e.g., message queue A 20) of computer system 80a before it is eventually forwarded to application layer A 10. When a plurality of messages and acknowledgments are sent between computer systems 80a and 80b, in particular between the software elements on these computer systems, the message queues are used to control the flow of the messages and acknowledgments to the particular software elements.
A disadvantage to the prior art is that the resources of the computer system that processes the acknowledgments (e.g., computer systems 80a and 80c) are consumed by the operations associated with adding and removing acknowledgments from the message queues. For example, the computer system needs to establish field lengths for storing the acknowledgments and then needs to write the acknowledgments to the message queue. The computer system needs to synchronize the source and target software elements. It is sometimes necessary for the computer system to copy the acknowledgment before removing it from the message queue. Also, the computer system needs to specify and move pointers. Thus, the prior art techniques for processing acknowledgments consume a computer system's processing cycles and memory resources in order to complete the required operations.
The discussion above can be readily extrapolated to the exchange of other types of messages and to data transmission in the prior art. For example, a command or request from one computer system to a second computer system is placed into a queue, and there is overhead associated with processing the exchange. The prior art techniques for message exchange and data transmission require a significant amount of processing overhead, and hence the overall performance of the computer system can be significantly reduced.
Accordingly, what is needed is a method to reduce the processing overhead associated with message exchange and data transmission. What is further needed is a method to improve the overall performance of the computer system in this regard. The present invention provides a novel solution to the above needs.
These and other objects and advantages of the present invention will become obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art after having read the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments which are illustrated in the various drawing figures.
The present invention provides a method to reduce the processing overhead associated with message exchange and data transmission, and improves the overall performance of the computer system in this regard.
The present invention pertains to a method for exchanging messages between software elements in computer systems communicatively coupled in a computer system network. A message is sent from a software element of a first computer system (e.g., a client computer system) to a second computer system (e.g., a server computer system). A shared memory unit of the second computer system is directly accessed, bypassing the processor of the second computer system. The shared memory unit is accessible by the software element of the first computer system and a software element of the second computer system. Data of interest are directly read from or written to the shared memory unit.
In one embodiment, the present invention pertains to a method for acknowledging messages between a first software element and a second software element. A plurality of messages is sent from the first software element to the second software element. A count of each of the plurality of messages sent by the first software element is maintained. A message is written from the second software element to a memory unit shared by the first software element and by the second software element when the count reaches a prescribed number. The message from the second software element acknowledges receipt of the prescribed number of messages from the first software element.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention:
Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the invention will be described in conjunction with the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that they are not intended to limit the invention to these embodiments. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents, which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Furthermore, in the following detailed description of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, and circuits have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the present invention.
Some portions of the detailed descriptions which follow are presented in terms of procedures, logic blocks, processing, and other symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a computer memory. These descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. In the present application, a procedure, logic block, process, or the like, is conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps or instructions leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, although not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated in a computer system. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as transactions, bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, fragments, pixels, or the like.
As used herein, a transaction refers to the transmission or receipt of data or other such message information. The transaction may consist of all data associated with a particular computer system operation (e.g., a request or command). A transaction may also consist of a block of data associated with a particular operation; for example, a transfer of data may be broken down into several blocks of data, each block transferred prior to the transfer of a subsequent block, and each block making up a transaction.
It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussions, it is appreciated that throughout the present invention, discussions utilizing terms such as "sending," "accessing," "maintaining," "writing," "initializing," "incrementing," or the like, refer to actions and processes of a computer system or similar electronic computing device (e.g., the processes of FIG. 6 and FIG. 7). The computer system or similar electronic computing device manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system memories, registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices. The present invention is well suited to the use of other computer systems.
Refer to
Display device 105 utilized with computer system 190 of the present invention may be a liquid crystal device, cathode ray tube, or other display device suitable for creating graphic images and alphanumeric characters recognizable to the user. Cursor control device 107 allows the computer user to dynamically signal the two-dimensional movement of a visible symbol (pointer) on a display screen of display device 105. Many implementations of the cursor control device are known in the art including a trackball, mouse, joystick or special keys on alphanumeric input device 106 capable of signaling movement of a given direction or manner of displacement. It is to be appreciated that the cursor control device 107 also may be directed and/or activated via input from the keyboard using special keys and key sequence commands. Alternatively, the cursor may be directed and/or activated via input from a number of specially adapted cursor directing devices.
In accordance with the present embodiment of the present invention, computer system 190 executes software elements such as an operating system, device drivers, application programs ("applications") including computer software programs, word processors, database management systems, electronic mail, and the like, and communication programs that execute communication protocols that define the procedures to be followed when data are transmitted and received.
Network adapters 410a, 410b and 410c are coupled to network hardware 420 (e.g., a switch or a router or the like). Network hardware 420 in turn is coupled to a plurality of "back end" memory systems, such as a buffer system or a disk system or the like, represented by memory units 430a, 430b and 430c. It is appreciated that a different number of memory units than that illustrated by
Thus, in accordance with the present invention, a message from a client computer system (e.g., computer system 190a of
Continuing with reference to
In the present embodiment of the present invention, computer system 190a includes shared memory unit 354 which is exposed to both software element A 350 and B 352. Shared memory unit 354 is a portion of the memory of computer system 190a (e.g., random access memory 102 of
In one embodiment of the present invention, computer system 190a also includes memory unit 355. In this embodiment, the contents of shared memory unit 354 are copied to memory unit 355 by computer system 190a. Thus, if shared memory unit 354 is written to by software element B 352, the previous contents of shared memory unit 354 are stored elsewhere and are not overwritten.
Continuing with reference to
Typically, a prescribed number of messages are sent by the source software element before acknowledgment 362 is sent; the prescribed number of messages is commonly referred to as the window size. For example, for a window size equal to ten (10), 10 messages may be sent from software element A 350 before acknowledgment 362 is required. Software element A 350 will not transmit any further messages until it receives acknowledgment 362. After receiving acknowledgment 362, the software element A 350 transmits the next group of 10 messages. In some implementations, the window size is varied using mechanisms known in the art; for example, the window size may be increased or decreased as a function of how much data traffic is flowing over the computer system bus (e.g., bus 100 of FIG. 2). The present invention may be utilized whether the window size is constant or variable.
In accordance with the present embodiment of the present invention, after the prescribed number of messages are received by software element B 352, acknowledgment 362 is written to shared memory unit 354 by computer system 190a using DMA. Thus, software element A 350 needs only to read shared memory unit 354 to determine if an acknowledgment has been received so that the next group of messages can be sent. Additional details are provided in conjunction with FIG. 7.
In one embodiment, acknowledgment 362 comprises a credit value corresponding to the window size. That is, acknowledgment 362 specifies a credit value that prescribes the number of messages that can be sent from software element A 350 before an acknowledgment is needed from software element B 352. In this embodiment, acknowledgment 362 specifying the credit value is written to shared memory unit 354 using DMA as described above. The credit value is copied from shared memory unit 354 to memory unit 355.
In accordance with the present embodiment of the present invention, for each message 361 sent by the source software element, the credit value in memory unit 355 is reduced by one. Software element A 350 continues to send messages until the credit value is zero. Software element B 352 then writes acknowledgment 362 to shared memory unit 354, thereby restoring the credit value to its initial value so that source software element A 350 can proceed to send the next group of messages. Additional details are provided in conjunction with FIG. 7.
The software elements executed by computer system 190b are represented by application layer 310. Similarly, the software elements executed by computer system 190c are represented by application layer 360. The software elements executed by computer systems 190b and 190c include any of the various software elements known in the art, including for example software applications (e.g., word processors, database management systems, electronic mail and the like) and protocol stacks written in an operating system or device drivers.
In the present embodiment of the present invention, computer system 190b includes shared memory unit 315 which is exposed to both application layer 310 and application layer 360. Shared memory unit 315 is a portion of the memory of computer system 190b (e.g., random access memory 102 of
In one embodiment of the present invention, computer system 190b also includes memory unit 317. In this embodiment, the contents of shared memory unit 315 are copied to memory unit 317 by computer system 190b. Thus, if shared memory unit 315 is written to by computer system 190c, the previous contents of shared memory unit 315 are stored elsewhere and are not overwritten.
Continuing with reference to
In accordance with the present embodiment of the present invention, after the prescribed number of messages are received by the target software element in application layer 360, acknowledgment 395 is written to shared memory unit 315 by computer system 190c using DMA. Thus, the source software element in application layer 310 of computer system 190b needs only to read shared memory unit 315 to determine if an acknowledgment has been received so that the next group of messages can be sent. Additional details are provided in conjunction with FIG. 7.
In one embodiment, acknowledgment 395 comprises a credit value corresponding to the window size. That is, acknowledgment 395 specifies a credit value that prescribes the number of messages that can be sent from the source software element of computer system 190b before an acknowledgment is needed from computer system 190c. In this embodiment, acknowledgment 395 specifying the credit value is written to shared memory unit 315 using DMA as described above. The credit value is copied from shared memory unit 315 to memory unit 317. In accordance with the present embodiment of the present invention, for each message 390 sent by the source software element, the credit value in memory unit 317 is reduced by one. The source software element continues to send messages until the credit value is zero. The target software element then writes acknowledgment 395 to shared memory unit 315, thereby restoring the credit value to its initial value so that the source software element can proceed to send the next group of messages. Additional details are provided in conjunction with FIG. 7.
In step 605 of
In step 615 of
In step 620 of
In step 625 of
In step 630, if the page resides in shared memory unit 430a, then the page can be directly accessed using the memory location in table 440 in accordance with the present invention; that is, processor 330 is bypassed. If the page of interest is not located in shared memory unit 430a, then processing of the read command proceeds in the typical fashion in order to retrieve it from the memory of server computer system 400.
Thus, the present embodiment of the present invention uses a shared memory unit (e.g., shared memory unit 430a of
In step 710 of
In step 720, messages associated with a particular transaction are sent from the source software element to the target software element (e.g., software element B 352 or a software element in application layer 360).
In step 730, a count is maintained of the number of messages associated with the particular transaction of interest that are sent from the source software element to the target software element. The source software element reads the appropriate memory location (see step 710) to determine whether the number of messages sent is less than the prescribed value.
In step 740, when the number of messages sent is equal to the prescribed number from step 710, no further messages associated with the particular transaction of interest are sent from the source software element until an acknowledgment is received from the target software element. In accordance with the present invention, the acknowledgment is written to shared memory (e.g., shared memory 354 and 315 of
In one embodiment (step 740a), the credit value in shared memory 315 or 354 is copied to memory unit 317 or 355, respectively. Thus, when the information in shared memory is overwritten by an acknowledgment, the preceding information is preserved in memory unit 317 or 355.
In step 750, the source software element reads shared memory 315 or 354 to determine whether the acknowledgment is received. In the alternate embodiment, the source software element reads memory unit 317 or 355 to determine whether the acknowledgment is received. If so, the source software element can proceed with sending the next group of messages associated with the particular transaction.
In one embodiment (step 710a), the number of messages prescribed in step 710 is used to initialize a credit value in shared memory 315 or 354. The initial credit value is thus equal to the number of messages that may be sent from the source software element before an acknowledgment from the target software element is needed.
In this embodiment, in step 730a, the credit value from step 710a is changed incrementally for each message sent that is associated with a particular transaction. The source software element reads the credit value to determine whether messages can continue to be sent. When the credit value reaches a prescribed value, the source software element does not send any further messages until an acknowledgment is received from the target software element.
For example, the credit value could be set to an initial value of 10 and the prescribed value could be set to zero. For each message sent by the source software element for the particular transaction of interest, the credit value is incrementally reduced by one. When the prescribed value of zero is reached, an acknowledgment is required from the target software element. Similarly, the credit value could be set to 10 and the prescribed value set to 20, and the credit value could be incrementally increased by one for each message sent by the source software element until the value of 20 is reached. It is appreciated that any value for the initial credit value, the prescribed value, and the incremental value could be used in accordance with the present invention.
In accordance with the present embodiment of the present invention, the source software element then reads shared memory to determine that the acknowledgment has been received. In this embodiment, the acknowledgment restores the credit value in shared memory to its initial value (e.g., back to 10 according to the example above); however, as explained above, the credit value can be varied according to, for example, how busy the computer system or the network is. In this embodiment, the source software element reads the credit value and determines that the credit value is reset. For example, the source software element determines that the credit value is not zero and so can deduce that an acknowledgment was received.
Thus, the present embodiment of the present invention uses a shared memory that is exposed to both the source software element and the target software element. The target software element is thus able to write an acknowledgment to the shared memory, and the source software element is able to read the shared memory to determine if an acknowledgment is received. In one embodiment, the acknowledgment is used to reset a credit value. In this embodiment, the source software element reads the credit value to determine whether an acknowledgment is received. If, for example, the credit value is not equal to a prescribed value (e.g., zero), then the source software element can proceed with sending messages to the target software element. Thus, in accordance with the present embodiment of the present invention, it is not necessary to expend computer system resources in order to perform operations associated with processing acknowledgments. The present invention thus provides a method that reduces the processing overhead associated with flow control of acknowledgments that are sent by software elements in response to messages from other software elements. Consequently, the present invention frees up processing and memory resources for other operations. Hence, the present invention improves the overall performance of the computer system in this regard.
The preferred embodiment of the present invention, remote access using shared memory, is thus described. While the present invention has been described in particular embodiments, it should be appreciated that the present invention should not be construed as limited by such embodiments, but rather construed according to the following claims.
Chesson, Gregory L., Pinkerton, James T., Salo, Eric
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
6886031, | Mar 29 2001 | Oracle America, Inc | Efficient connection and memory management for message passing on a single SMP or a cluster of SMPs |
6910080, | Nov 06 2001 | International Business Machines Corporation | Communication efficiency and performance in an unreliable communication environment |
8832217, | Sep 29 2011 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for supporting different message queues in a transactional middleware machine environment |
9116761, | Sep 29 2011 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for preventing single-point bottleneck in a transactional middleware machine environment |
9558048, | Sep 30 2011 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for managing message queues for multinode applications in a transactional middleware machine environment |
9690638, | Sep 29 2011 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for supporting a complex message header in a transactional middleware machine environment |
9996403, | Sep 30 2011 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for providing message queues for multinode applications in a middleware machine environment |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5239643, | Nov 30 1987 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for reducing disk I/O accesses in a multi-processor clustered type data processing system |
5404478, | Dec 28 1989 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Method of managing a virtual storage for a multi-processor system |
5522045, | Mar 27 1992 | Panasonic Corporation of North America | Method for updating value in distributed shared virtual memory among interconnected computer nodes having page table with minimal processor involvement |
5606666, | Jul 19 1994 | International Business Machines Corp | Method and apparatus for distributing control messages between interconnected processing elements by mapping control messages of a shared memory addressable by the receiving processing element |
5961606, | Jun 30 1997 | Oracle America, Inc | System and method for remote buffer allocation in exported memory segments and message passing between network nodes |
6430598, | Jan 29 1999 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for deleting messages from a server |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Oct 11 1999 | SALO, ERIC | Silicon Graphics, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010355 | /0877 | |
Oct 11 1999 | CHESSON, GREGORY L | Silicon Graphics, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010355 | /0877 | |
Oct 12 1999 | PINKERTON, JAMES | Silicon Graphics, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010355 | /0877 | |
Oct 25 1999 | Silicon Graphics, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Apr 12 2005 | SILICON GRAPHICS, INC AND SILICON GRAPHICS FEDERAL, INC EACH A DELAWARE CORPORATION | WELLS FARGO FOOTHILL CAPITAL, INC | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 016871 | /0809 | |
Oct 17 2006 | Silicon Graphics, Inc | General Electric Capital Corporation | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 018545 | /0777 | |
Sep 26 2007 | General Electric Capital Corporation | MORGAN STANLEY & CO , INCORPORATED | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 019995 | /0895 | |
Apr 30 2009 | WELLS FARGO FOOTHILL CAPITAL, INC | SILICON GRAPHICS INC | ORDER AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF ALL OR SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF THE ASSETS OF THE DEBTORS FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL LIENS, CLAIMS, ENCUMBRANCES, AND INTERESTS | 039461 | /0418 | |
May 08 2009 | Silicon Graphics, Inc | SILICON GRAPHICS INTERNATIONAL, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 032714 | /0032 | |
May 08 2009 | MORGAN STANLEY & CO , INCORPORATED | Silicon Graphics, Inc | ORDER AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF ALL OR SUBSTANTIALLY ALL OF THE ASSETS OF THE DEBTORS FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL LIENS, CLAIMS, ENCUMBRANCES, AND INTERESTS | 039461 | /0713 | |
May 08 2009 | SILICON GRAPHICS, INC ET AL | SILICON GRAPHICS INTERNATIONAL, CORP | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 027717 | /0868 | |
May 13 2009 | SILICON GRAPHICS INTERNATIONAL, INC | SGI INTERNATIONAL, INC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 032714 | /0230 | |
Feb 08 2012 | SGI INTERNATIONAL, INC | SILICON GRAPHICS INTERNATIONAL, CORP | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 027717 | /0868 | |
Aug 08 2012 | SGI INTERNATIONAL, INC | Silicon Graphics International Corp | MERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 032714 | /0427 | |
Jan 27 2015 | Silicon Graphics International Corp | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 035200 | /0722 | |
Nov 01 2016 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC , AS AGENT | Silicon Graphics International Corp | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 040545 | /0362 | |
May 01 2017 | Silicon Graphics International Corp | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 044128 | /0149 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Sep 01 2004 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Jan 22 2008 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Jan 28 2008 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Jan 20 2012 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Jan 20 2016 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jul 20 2007 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jan 20 2008 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 20 2008 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jul 20 2010 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jul 20 2011 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jan 20 2012 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 20 2012 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jul 20 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jul 20 2015 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jan 20 2016 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jul 20 2016 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jul 20 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |