A method for representing a digital image in a plurality of image processing states using at least one reference digital image and at least one residual image comprising the steps of manipulating an input digital image using at least one digital image processing enhancement step to form at least one additional digital image in a different image processing state; designating at least one of the digital images to be a reference digital image in a reference image processing state; and determining at least one residual image representing differences between one of the reference digital images and one of the additional digital images, whereby the residual image(s) and the reference digital image(s) can be used to form digital image(s) in different image processing states.
|
1. A method for representing a digital image in a plurality of image processing states using at least one reference digital image and at least one residual image comprising the steps of:
(a) manipulating an input digital image using at least one digital image processing enhancement step to form at least one additional digital image in a different image processing state; (b) designating at least one of the digital images to be a reference digital image in a reference image processing state; and (c) determining at least one residual image representing differences between one of the reference digital images and one of the additional digital images, whereby the residual image(s) and the reference digital image(s) can be used to form digital image(s) in different image processing states.
34. A method for representing and manipulating a digital image in a plurality of image processing states using at least one reference digital image and at least one residual image comprising the steps of:
(a) manipulating an input digital image using at least one digital image processing enhancement step to form at least one additional digital image having different image processing state; (b) designating at least one of the digital images to be a reference digital image for a reference image processing state; (c) determining at least one residual image representing differences between one of the reference digital images and one of the additional digital images, whereby the residual image(s) and the reference digital image(s) can be used to form digital image(s) in different image processing states; and (d) using at least one residual image together with the appropriate reference digital image and a specified desirable modification to the digital image to produce a modified digital image.
29. A method of forming one or more reconstructed digital image(s) from one or more reference digital image(s) and one or more residual image(s) which are produced by the steps of; manipulating an input digital image using at least one digital image processing enhancement step to form at least one additional digital image in a different image processing state; designating at least one of the digital images to be a reference digital image in a reference image processing state; and determining at least one residual image representing differences between one of the reference digital images and one of the additional digital images, whereby the residual image(s) and the reference digital image(s) can be used to form digital image(s) in different image processing states; such method comprising the steps of:
(a) receiving one or more reference digital image(s) and one or more residual image(s); and (b) combining one reference digital image and one or more residual image(s) to for each of one or more reconstructed digital image(s) corresponding to original image processing state(s).
30. A method of forming one or more new digital image(s) from one or more reference digital image(s) and one or more residual image(s) which are produced by the steps of; manipulating an input digital image using at least one digital image processing enhancement step to form at least one additional digital image in a different image processing state; designating at least one of the digital images to be a reference digital image in a reference image processing state; and determining at least one residual image representing differences between one of the reference digital images and one of the additional digital images, whereby the residual image(s) and the reference digital image(s) can be used to form digital image(s) in different image processing states; such method comprising the steps of:
(a) receiving one or more reference digital image(s) and one or more residual image(s); and (b) combining one or more reference digital image(s) and one or more residual image(s) to form each of one or more digital image(s) in image processing state(s) different from the original image processing states.
2. The method of
3. The method of
4. The method of
6. The method of
7. The method of
8. The method of
9. The method of
10. The method of
11. The method of
12. The method of
13. The method of
14. The method of
15. The method of
16. The method of
17. The method of
18. The method of
19. The method of
20. The method of
21. The method of
22. The method of
23. The method of
24. The method of
25. The method of
26. The method of
27. The method of
28. The method of
31. The method of
32. The meth of
33. The method of
36. The method of
|
Reference is made to commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 6,282,313, entitled "Using a Set of Residual Images to Represent an Extended Color Gamut Digital Image" to McCarthy et al; U.S. Pat. No. 6,335,983, entitled "Representing an Extended Color Gamut Digital Image in a Limited Color Gamut Color Space" to McCarthy et al; U.S. Pat. No. 6,282,311, entitled "Using a Residual Image to Represent an Extended Color Gamut. Digital Image" to McCarthy et al; U.S. Pat. No. 6,285,784 entitled "Method of Applying Manipulations to an Extended Color Gamut Digital Image" to Spaulding et al; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,282,312, entitled "A System Using One or More Residual Image(s) to Represent an Extended Color Gamut Digital Image" to McCarthy et al, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to the field of digital imaging and, more precisely, to representing one or more digital images in a plurality of image processing states through the use of residual images.
In forming digital images, an input digital image (in a predetermined image processing state) can be processed through a series of digital image processing enhancement steps. At the output of each digital image processing enhancement step, a digital image in another image processing state is produced. The image processing state inherent in any digital image is the result of the image source and the image processing that has been applied to the image, and is an indicator of the image information attributes retained in the image. For example, a digital image from a digital camera in a first, unsharpened, image processing state, can be processed by a digital image processing system that sharpens the digital image to produce a digital image in a second, sharpened, image processing state. If desired, this digital image can be processed by subsequent digital image processing enhancement steps where, for example, it can be color corrected, defect corrected, resampled, etc., to form a series of digital images in different image processing states. This arrangement is well known in the art. For example, see Delp (U.S. Pat. No. 5,420,967).
Generally, digital image processing systems produce a single digital image in some final image processing state. The final digital image can be stored in a digital storage device and/or displayed on an output device. A problem with this digital image processing scheme is that it lacks flexibility; it is not possible to go back at a later time and change any of the intermediate processing operations. For example, the digital image processing enhancement steps needed to produce an optimal digital image for one output device may produce a digital image that is sub-optimal for a different output device. For example, it may be desirable to apply a greater amount of sharpening for one output device and a lesser amount of sharpening for a different output device.
An alternative to the above image processing scheme is to store multiple digital images--each representing a different image processing state. Though this approach permits the digital image processing enhancement steps to be tailored for different uses, it has the disadvantage that a relatively large amount of digital memory can be required to store the full set of digital images.
Various other methods have been developed to provide some means of adapting a digital image from one intended use to another. For example, certain image processing operations may make use of non-image information, conveying image characteristics, in order to properly adapt subsequent processing parameters when modifying the digital image for another use. Non-image information, or metadata, refers to data that is carried along with each digital image and provides information about the capture conditions, capture devices, expected noise statistics, prior image processing operations, etc. An example of this type of image processing operation is image-dependent sharpening, where a measure of the imaging chain Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) could be used to adaptively change the sharpening applied to the digital image. During the processing of image information in a multi-stage imaging system, however, the non-image data is usually affected by every operation or transformation applied to the digital image. If this impact on the non-image data is not taken into account, then subsequent operations that make use of these data will not operate as intended and system performance (i.e. image quality) may suffer.
Another approach to providing flexible image processing that is well-known in the art involves the creation of a list of image processing commands, i.e., an image processing script, that is associated with the unchanged original digital image. In this case, the image processing script is applied to a copy of the original digital image to produce one desired output. When an alternative output is desired, the script can be modified and a copy of the original digital image can be processed through the revised script to create the alternative output. One drawback of this approach is that, as a digital image is conveyed from one imaging system to another, the interpretation of the commands in the associated image processing script may vary. This may result in unacceptable changes in the appearance of the digital image when it is processed through the script and displayed. Another disadvantage to this approach is that the digital image must always be processed before it is ready for use. This may result in unacceptable decreases in system throughput.
In general, when an image is rendered for a particular output, device characteristics pertinent to that output are used in that rendering. For example, the color gamut of the device and the MTF and resolution of the device, may be used to determine the color encoding and final sharpening applied to the image, respectively. As a result, a device-specific output prepared from an original image is typically preferred over a second-generation output prepared from a previously determined output image.
It is an object of the present invention to overcome the limitations of the prior art by providing a flexible arrangement for representing digital images in a plurality of image processing states. It has been recognized that the drawbacks of the prior arrangements can be mitigated, by providing a way to revise or redirect the intermediate image processing operations used to produce the final digital image.
This object is achieved by a method for representing a digital image in a plurality of image processing states using at least one reference digital image and at least one residual image comprising the steps of:
a) manipulating an input digital image using at least one digital image processing enhancement step to form at least one additional digital image in a different image processing state;
b) designating at least one of the digital images to be a reference digital image in a reference image processing state; and
c) determining at least one residual image representing differences between one of the reference digital images and one of the additional digital images, whereby the residual image(s) and the reference digital image(s) can be used to form digital image(s) in different image processing states.
It is an advantage of the present invention that, by using at least one residual image and at least one of the reference digital images, digital images can be formed in different image processing states. These image processing states can be reconstructions of original image processing states or can be new image processing states.
It also has the advantage that information about multiple, different image processing states can be retained without needing to store a full image for each different image processing state in digital memory.
It has the further advantage that a special rendering engine is not required to process a digital image from one image processing state to another.
It has the additional advantage that the use of the residual image(s) is optional. As a result, the benefits of the residual image(s) can be gained by applications that are able to make use of the information, without introducing an image-quality or computational penalty for applications that do not require the optional information or that are not able to make use of it.
One preferred embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 1. An input digital image 10-0 (in image processing state 0) is provided as the input to an imaging chain that includes a series of digital image processing enhancement steps 11-1 to 11-N. The output of each digital image processing enhancement step is another digital image 10-1 to 10-N. Each digital image is in a different image processing state. In
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the residual images 13-1 to 13-N are associated with the reference digital image 10-i and stored in digital memory. For example, the residual images 13-1 to 13-N can be stored as metadata in a digital image file containing the reference digital image 10-i. Alternatively, the reference digital image 10-i can be stored in one digital image file, and the residual images 13-1 to 13-N can be stored in one or more different, associated image file(s). In either case, whether the residual images are stored as metadata within the digital image file containing the reference image or whether the residual images are stored in separate files, the residual images can be stored in long-term, nonvolatile digital memory to ensure that any of the original digital images 10-1 to 10-N can be reconstructed at a later time. When desired, the residual images 13-1 to 13-N can be used, together with the reference digital image 10-i, to reconstruct one or more of the non-reference digital images 10-0 to 10-N, avoiding the need to store a full digital image for each of the different, non-reference, image processing states.
As shown in
Examples of a color-adjustment step include a color-balance operation, a fade-correction operation, a change in saturation, a hue rotation, and a change in color gamut. Examples of a tonescale-adjustment step include an exposure compensation, a change in dynamic range, a change in linear contrast, a nonlinear tonescale mapping, and a histogram normalization. Examples of a sharpness-adjustment step include a global linear sharpening operation, a global nonlinear sharpening operation, an unsharp-masking operation, and a locally-adaptive sharpening operation. There are also many other types of digital image processing enhancement steps that can be applied to a digital image. Other digital image processing enhancement steps that would commonly be found in imaging chains include capture-process-correction steps, defect-correction steps, and artistic-rendering steps. Capture-process-correction steps include the correction of optical aberrations (e.g. defocus, tilt, spherical aberration, coma, astigmatism, distortion, and chromatic aberration), geometrical effects (e.g. perspective correction), sensor effects (e.g. CFA interpolation, non-uniformity correction, and noise reduction), and illuminant effects (e.g. over-exposure or under-exposure, illuminant fall-off and lens flare). Defect-correction steps include scratch and crease reduction, dust reduction, grain reduction, red-eye reduction, blemish removal, and obscenity removal. Artistic-rendering steps include sepia toning, conversion from color to black and white, morphing, composition with graphics, and localized edits. It will be obvious to one skilled in the art that there are many additional types of digital image processing enhancement steps that could be included in imaging chains. In general, a given operation may affect only a subset of the pixels in the digital image on which it operates.
As was implied above, residual images can be used for a variety of purposes. For example, residual images provide a relatively efficient mechanism by which to store information about multiple image processing states. They permit the targeting of digital images for different fulfillment options, user preferences, etc., without requiring the storage of multiple digital images, and without the use of image processing scripts. Residual images also provide an efficient mechanism by which to exchange image-manipulation information between two, possibly remote, systems. For example, a user may apply a color-adjustment step to a digital image and transfer a determined residual to a networked image fulfillment server. This server can use the residual image to apply modifications to a locally-stored copy of the corresponding reference digital image, without requiring any knowledge about the actual manipulations applied to the remotely stored reference digital image. In general, a residual image can represent the result of any image processing operation(s) performed in one location or by one image processing system, and can be used to convey that result to another location or to another image processing system.
Residual images can also act as a mechanism by which to parameterize different digital image processing enhancement steps and system characteristics. For example, the determination of a residual image from a digital image in a noise-cleaned image processing state and a digital image in a pre-noise-cleaned image processing state can provide information about the noise content of a digital image. It will be obvious to one skilled in the art that there are many other uses for residual images.
In a variation of the present invention, the digital image processing enhancement steps applied in an imaging chain can exist along parallel image processing paths, rather than in sequence - thus creating branches in the imaging chain. An example of this variation is shown in
Using a residual image constructor 12, one or more branch residual images can be determined representing differences between the reference digital image 10-i and one or more of the branch digital images 15-1 to 15-M. In
In
From
In another preferred embodiment, digital images in different image processing states can be formed through the serial application of several different residuals, each associated with a different reference image processing state. The determination of such interdependent residual images is illustrated in FIG. 2. In this case an input digital image 20-0 (in image processing state 0) is provided as input to an imaging chain that includes a series of digital image processing enhancement steps 21-1 to 21-3. The output of each digital image processing enhancement step is another digital image 20-1 to 20-3. Each digital image is in a different image processing state. Each of the processed digital images 20-1 to 20-3 is designated to be a reference digital image for the corresponding digital image processing enhancement steps 21-1 to 21-3, respectively. Using a residual image constructor 22, a set of residual images 23-1 to 23-3 is determined representing the differences between the reference digital image for a given digital image processing enhancement step (i.e. the digital image output by the digital image processing enhancement step) and the digital image prior to that digital image processing enhancement step. For example, the residual image 23-2 is determined by the residual image constructor 22 using the reference digital image 20-2 (i.e. the digital image in image processing state 2) and the digital image prior to that digital image processing enhancement step 20-1 (i.e. the digital image in image processing state 1). In a preferred embodiment of this invention, the final output digital image 20-3 is stored in digital memory together with the set of residual images 23-1 to 23-3. The set of residual images 23-1 to 23-3 can be used in combination with the output digital image 20-3, to reconstruct digital images in another image processing state. The preferred embodiment designates the post-processing state to be the reference digital image for a given digital image processing enhancement step. It should be understood that other schemes can also be used.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the residual image information is encoded as the differences in code values between digital images in two different image processing states. In some cases, it may be desirable to encode one or more residual image(s) using a spatial frequency decomposition technique where the lower spatial frequency components of the residual image can be separated from the higher spatial frequency components. The use of a spatial frequency decomposition technique has benefits for the storage of residual images. For example, it is well known in the art that wavelet transforms can be used to affect spatial frequency decomposition of digital images. The use of a spatial frequency decomposition technique can also provide useful information to algorithms that use the residual images. For example, the information in various spatial frequency bands of the residual image created for a sharpness-adjustment step can be used to infer information about the noise characteristics of the digital image. Alternatively, the residual image information may be encoded as a parameterized representation of a specific processing operation, or as one or more mathematical transformations describing the differences between the digital images in two image processing states. It can be beneficial to use a logic tree to determine which method is the most applicable for a given case, i.e. on the basis of storage limitations, processing speed requirements, etc. In a preferred embodiment, access to any intermediate image processing state in an imaging chain can be achieved using an efficient combination of residual images and parameterized representations of digital image processing enhancement steps.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the spatial resolution of the residual images is the same as in the corresponding reference digital image. More generally, one or more of the residual images can be stored at a different spatial resolution than the associated reference digital image. This reduces the amount of digital memory needed to store the residual image(s), in the case where a lower-resolution residual image is formed. The different-resolution residual image(s) can be resampled at a later time to the spatial resolution of the corresponding reference digital image(s), for the subsequent formation of digital images in different image processing states.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a single residual image is determined representing the differences between the digital image in an arbitrary image processing state and the digital image in the reference image processing state. In general, a set of residual images can be formed such that each residual image in the set corresponds to a subset of pixels in the associated reference digital image. In this way, the complete residual image(s) can be stored as set(s) of residual image tiles. This can be useful, for example, in cases where there is a limitation on the size of metadata tags that can be stored with a digital image. It can also be advantageous in situations where only a portion of the digital image is modified and/or displayed, to maximize processing speed and minimize digital memory requirements. Similarly, in cases where a given processing operation affects only a subset of the pixels in the digital image, it can be advantageous to determine a residual image for only the affected pixels.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the number of color channels, or color planes, in the residual images is the same as in the corresponding reference digital image. In general, one or more residual image(s) can be determined using a subset of the color channels in the associated digital images. This can reduce the digital storage requirements for the residual(s). For example, in situations in which the majority of image structure information is contained in one channel of a multi-channel digital image, a single-channel sharpness-adjustment residual image can be formed. In some cases, it can be desirable to determine the residual image for a color channel that is not one of the original color channels in the digital image. For example, a luminance channel can be calculated from the red, green, and blue channels of a digital image. In this case, changes in luminance resulting from a given digital image processing enhancement step can be encoded by determining a residual image for the luminance channel alone.
In cases where a number of distinct component operations are applied to a digital image during a given digital image processing enhancement step in an imaging chain, it may be beneficial to determine a separate residual image for each component operation. This may permit subsequent modification of individual component operations without affecting the remainder of the processing involved in that particular digital image processing enhancement step. For example, a digital image processing enhancement step identified as "capture-process-correction" may include the component operations of noise reduction, and exposure correction. In some instances, it may be desirable to determine separate residual images for the noise reduction and then for the exposure correction, so that later adjustments in the noise reduction can be made without affecting the exposure correction.
In certain cases, it may be necessary to reduce the amount of digital memory required to store one or more residual image(s). In such cases, a data compression technique can be applied. This can effectively reduce the size of the residual image, without affecting its usefulness.
The residual image(s) determined using the methods of
One or more residual image(s), together with one or more corresponding reference digital image(s), can be used in the formation one or more different digital image(s) corresponding to new image processing state(s)--i.e. image processing state(s) that did not exist in the original imaging chain. For example, one or more residual image(s) and corresponding reference digital image(s) can be used to reconstruct an intermediate image processing state in the original imaging chain. An alternate imaging chain can then be applied to form a new digital image. For example, a new digital image can be formed that is appropriate for display on an output device having characteristics different than the output device for which the original output digital image was optimized. For example, a digital image intended for display on a softcopy monitor can be re-purposed for fulfillment as ink jet hardcopy. Alternatively, it may be useful to specify a desirable modification to the original imaging chain to form a new digital image in a new image processing state. For example, if one of the digital image processing enhancement step in the original imaging chain is a sharpness-adjustment step, it may be desirable to modify the amount of sharpness adjustment that was applied to the digital image. In this case, the residual image(s), together with the reference digital image(s), can be used to reconstruct an image processing state prior to the sharpness-adjustment step in the imaging chain. The amount of sharpness adjustment can then be modified accordingly. The desirable modification to the digital image may be interactively user-specified or, alternatively, may be determined using an automatic algorithm.
Another example of using residual images to form a digital image in a new image processing state is illustrated in FIG. 4. In this figure, a reference digital image 40 in a reference image processing state is combined with residual images 41-1 and 41-2 using a digital image re-constructor 42 to form reconstructed digital images 43-1 and 43-2. A digital image blender 44 is used to form a new digital image 45 by forming a numerically-weighted combination of the reconstructed digital images 43-1 and 43-2. For example, if one reconstructed digital image 43-1 corresponds to a contrast-adjusted image processing state and the other reconstructed digital image 43-2 corresponds to a saturation-adjusted image processing state, the digital image blender 44 can individually weight each reconstructed digital image to adjust the contrast and color saturation of the new digital image 45. It may be desirable in some applications to allow users to interactively control the weighting procedure according to their subjective preferences or to manage the weighting using an automatic algorithm.
It should be noted that a similar result can be obtained by forming a new residual image that is a weighted combination one or more of residual image(s). An example of this is shown in FIG. 5. This figure illustrates a new residual image 53 that is formed by a weighted combination of residual images 51-1 and 51-2. The new residual image 53 can then be combined with the reference digital image 50 using a digital image re-constructor 54 to form a new digital image 55.
As was mentioned above, one or more residual image(s) can be encoded using a spatial frequency decomposition technique. In these cases, a digital image in a new image processing state can be formed by individually adjusting the various spatial frequency bands of the residual image and then combining the new residual image with the corresponding reference image. For example, in some cases, the adjustment of certain spatial frequency bands can be used to modify the sharpness of a digital image.
The invention has been described in detail with particular reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the spirit and scope of the invention.
PARTS LIST | |
10-0 | input digital image |
10-1 through 10-N | processed digital images |
10-i | reference digital image |
11-1 through 11-N | digital image processing enhancement steps |
12 | residual image constructor |
13-1 through 13-N | residual images |
14-1 through 14-M | branch digital image processing enhancement steps |
15-1 through 15-M | branch digital images |
16-M | branch residual image |
20-0 | input digital image |
20-1 through 20-3 | processed digital images (used as reference images) |
21-1 through 21-3 | digital image processing enhancement steps |
22 | residual image constructor |
23-1 through 23-3 | residual images |
30 | reference digital image |
31 | residual image |
32 | digital image re-constructor |
33 | reconstructed digital image |
40 | reference digital image |
41-1 | residual image (for reference state and state 1) |
41-2 | residual image (for reference state and state 2) |
42 | digital image re-constructor |
43-1 | reconstructed digital image (state 1) |
43-2 | reconstructed digital image (state 2) |
44 | digital image blender |
45 | digital image (new state) |
50 | reference digital image |
51-1 | residual image (for reference state and state 1) |
51-2 | residual image (for reference state and state 2) |
52 | residual image blender |
53 | residual image (for reference state and new state) |
54 | digital image re-constructor |
55 | digital image (new state) |
Gindele, Edward B., Spaulding, Kevin E., McCarthy, Ann L., Parada, Robert J.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10186211, | Jul 27 2004 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Rapid estimation of effective illuminance patterns for projected light fields |
10373574, | Feb 24 2009 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Locally dimmed quantum dot display |
10540932, | Jul 27 2004 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Rapid estimation of effective illuminance patterns for projected light fields |
10607569, | Jun 25 2008 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | High dynamic range display using LED backlighting, stacked optical films, and LCD drive signals based on a low resolution light field simulation |
11127116, | Dec 01 2015 | Sony Corporation | Surgery control apparatus, surgery control method, program, and surgery system |
11418817, | Apr 23 2004 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Apparatus and methods for encoding, decoding and representing high dynamic range images |
11501724, | Jul 27 2004 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Rapid estimation of effective illuminance patterns for projected light fields |
6937362, | Apr 05 2000 | Eastman Kodak Company | Method for providing access to an extended color gamut digital image and providing payment therefor |
7454085, | Apr 29 2005 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and apparatus for the creation of textures and borders for digital images |
7466321, | Jul 26 2005 | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | Method and apparatus for the creation of cartoon effect videos |
7545996, | Apr 29 2005 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and apparatus for the creation of image post-processing parameter curves |
7593023, | Jul 27 2005 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.; HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | Method and apparatus for the creation of randomized custom image effects |
7747098, | Dec 18 2006 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Representing and reconstructing high dynamic range images |
7798963, | Mar 04 2005 | FUJIFILM SONOSITE, INC | Method for synchronization of breathing signal with the capture of ultrasound data |
7920167, | Apr 29 2005 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and apparatus for the creation of image capture device parameter curves |
7933462, | Dec 18 2006 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Representing and reconstructing high dynamic range images |
8004584, | Apr 29 2005 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and apparatus for the creation of compound digital image effects |
8115939, | Oct 24 2005 | Fuji Xerox Co. Ltd. | Image processing apparatus, image processing method and storage medium storing image processing |
8174546, | Jul 27 2004 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Apparatus and methods for rapid image rendering on dual-modulator displays |
8184919, | Dec 18 2006 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Representing and reconstructing high dynamic range images |
8204328, | Apr 08 2008 | The United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of the Navy | Automated underwater image restoration via denoised deconvolution |
8217970, | Jul 27 2004 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Rapid image rendering on dual-modulator displays |
8218625, | Apr 23 2004 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Encoding, decoding and representing high dynamic range images |
8249337, | Apr 15 2004 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Methods and systems for converting images from low dynamic range to high dynamic range |
8265378, | Apr 15 2004 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Methods and systems for converting images from low dynamic to high dynamic range |
8437568, | Apr 08 2008 | USA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, THE | Automated underwater image restoration via denoised deconvolution |
8437569, | Apr 08 2008 | USA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, THE | Automated underwater image restoration via denoised deconvolution |
8482698, | Jun 25 2008 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | High dynamic range display using LED backlighting, stacked optical films, and LCD drive signals based on a low resolution light field simulation |
8503814, | Jan 19 2009 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for spectrum estimation |
8509528, | Apr 15 2004 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Methods and systems for converting images from low dynamic range to high dynamic range |
8514934, | Apr 23 2004 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Apparatus and methods for encoding, decoding and representing high dynamic range images |
8624944, | Jul 27 2004 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Rapid image rendering on dual-modulator displays |
8639055, | Apr 08 2008 | USA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, THE | Automated underwater image restoration via denoised deconvolution |
8811756, | Jul 11 2011 | BEIJING ZITIAO NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO , LTD | Image compression |
8885967, | Jan 19 2009 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for content adaptive sharpness enhancement |
8983222, | May 14 2012 | The United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of the Navy; THE USA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY | Automated underwater image restoration via denoised deconvolution |
8988418, | Jan 05 2007 | Florelle, Inc. | System and method for parametric display of modular aesthetic designs |
9042682, | May 23 2012 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Content creation using interpolation between content versions |
9099046, | Feb 24 2009 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Apparatus for providing light source modulation in dual modulator displays |
9269312, | Jul 27 2004 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Rapid estimation of effective illuminance patterns for projected light fields |
9412156, | Apr 23 2004 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Apparatus and methods for encoding, decoding and representing high dynamic range images |
9478176, | Jul 27 2004 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Rapid estimation of effective illuminance patterns for projected light fields |
9478182, | Feb 24 2009 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Locally dimmed quantum dots (nano-crystal) based display |
9648356, | Apr 23 2004 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Apparatus and methods for encoding, decoding and representing high dynamic range images |
9711111, | Jun 25 2008 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | High dynamic range display using LED backlighting, stacked optical films, and LCD drive signals based on a low resolution light field simulation |
9911389, | Feb 24 2009 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Locally dimmed quantum dot display |
9934733, | Jul 27 2004 | Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Rapid estimation of effective illuminance patterns for projected light fields |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4417270, | Jan 28 1981 | Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Wide band chrominance demodulator with color noise reduction function |
4663660, | Jun 20 1986 | RCA Corporation | Compressed quantized image-data transmission technique suitable for use in teleconferencing |
4674125, | Jun 27 1983 | RCA Corporation | Real-time hierarchal pyramid signal processing apparatus |
5122873, | Sep 15 1989 | Intel Corporation; INTEL CORPORATION, A DE CORP | Method and apparatus for selectively encoding and decoding a digital motion video signal at multiple resolution levels |
5268754, | Mar 01 1991 | Barco Graphics N.V. | Method and a device for converting a color coordinate set |
5317425, | Feb 10 1992 | EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, A CORP OF NJ | Technique for use in conjunction with an imaging system for providing an appearance match between two images and for calibrating the system thereto |
5333069, | Feb 10 1992 | Eastman Kodak Company | Technique for use in conjunction with an imaging system for providing an appearance match between two images and for calibrating the system thereto |
5420967, | Nov 10 1992 | International Business Machines Corporation; INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION | Method and apparatus for the efficient generation of high quality images in a computer system utilizing an interconnected image state table |
5510910, | May 04 1992 | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | Printing with full printer color gamut, through use of gamut superposition in a common perceptual space |
5654820, | May 08 1992 | IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC | Optoelectronic system for implementation of iterative computer tomography algorithms |
5666215, | Feb 25 1994 | Eastman Kodak Company | System and method for remotely selecting photographic images |
5713062, | Sep 26 1996 | Xerox Corporation | Color mixing and control system for use in an electrostatographic printing machine |
5757372, | Jan 16 1996 | Nuance Communications, Inc | Multiple nonlinear undo buttons |
5760386, | Nov 23 1995 | Eastman Kodak Company | Recording of images |
5852565, | Jan 30 1996 | DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC ; Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation | Temporal and resolution layering in advanced television |
5930405, | Nov 28 1994 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Image change sensing and storage apparatus and method |
5949967, | Dec 12 1997 | Eastman Kodak Company | Transforming input color values to device control signals |
5983251, | Sep 08 1993 | IDT, Inc. | Method and apparatus for data analysis |
5990931, | Apr 10 1996 | Cisco Technology, Inc | Automatic display update of still frame images for videoconferencing |
6285784, | Sep 28 1998 | Monument Peak Ventures, LLC | Method of applying manipulations to an extended color gamut digital image |
6301393, | Jan 21 2000 | Monument Peak Ventures, LLC | Using a residual image formed from a clipped limited color gamut digital image to represent an extended color gamut digital image |
6314198, | Sep 25 1996 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Radiographic, digital image processing system |
6335983, | Sep 28 1998 | Monument Peak Ventures, LLC | Representing an extended color gamut digital image in a limited color gamut color space |
6459500, | Mar 04 1998 | FUJIFILM Corporation | Image processing apparatus |
6707950, | Jun 22 1999 | Monument Peak Ventures, LLC | Method for modification of non-image data in an image processing chain |
20020118887, | |||
20030161520, | |||
WO9822588, |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Aug 10 2004 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Feb 21 2008 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Feb 24 2012 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Feb 23 2016 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Sep 21 2007 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Mar 21 2008 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 21 2008 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Sep 21 2010 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Sep 21 2011 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Mar 21 2012 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 21 2012 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Sep 21 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Sep 21 2015 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Mar 21 2016 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 21 2016 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Sep 21 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |