A biaxially oriented polyolefin multilayer film having a skin layer having oil-absorbing porous particles is disclosed. The film has substantially a small amount of porous particles on a weight basis of the total weight of the film and yet shows substantially no visible distortion after exposure to food products such as potato chips.

Patent
   6800363
Priority
Aug 30 2001
Filed
Aug 29 2002
Issued
Oct 05 2004
Expiry
Aug 29 2022
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
9
6
all paid
1. A biaxially oriented polyolefin multilayer film comprising a skin layer having a surface exposed to an environment surrounding the film, the skin layer being a single layer and comprising porous particles exposed to the environment, wherein a weight percent of the porous particles in said skin layer is in a range of about 2.5 weight percent to about 15 weight percent based on the total weight of the skin layer, further comprising a metallized layer.
2. The film of claim 1, wherein the metallized layer comprises aluminum and has an optical density in the range of from about 1.6 to about 3.5.
3. The film of claim 1, wherein the porous particles protrude into the environment from the surface of the skin layer exposed to the environment.
4. The film of claim 1, wherein the porous particles are capable of absorbing an oil and/or an oil-vapor.
5. The film of claim 1, wherein the particles have an average particle size in the range of about 1 micron to about 8 micron.
6. The film of claim 1, wherein a thickness of the skin layer is about 1 percent to about 40 percent of a total thickness of the film.
7. The film of claim 1, wherein the particles are inorganic particles, organic particles, or combinations thereof.
8. The film of claim 1, wherein the particles are selected from the group consisting of calcium carbonate, silicone dioxide, amorphous silica, sodium aluminosilicate and activated charcoal.
9. The film of claim 1, wherein the skin layer comprises polypropylene.
10. The film of claim 1, wherein the skin layer is a cold seal adhesion layer, a heat sealable layer, or combinations thereof.
11. The film of claim 10, wherein the cold seal adhesion layer is surface treated with a corona treatment, a flame treatment, atmospheric plasma, or a corona treatment utilizing a mixed gas environment of nitrogen and carbon dioxide.
12. The film of claim 10, wherein the cold seal adhesion layer comprises a material selected from the group consisting of an isotactic polypropylene homopolymer, syndiotactic polypropylene homopolymer, metallocene catalyzed isotactic polypropylene homopolymer, metallocene catalyzed syndiotactic polypropylene homopolymer, ethylene-propylene random copolymer, butene-propylene random copolymer, ethylene-propylene-butene-1 terpolymer, low density polyethylene, linear low density polyethylene, very low density pal yethylene, metallocene catalyzed polyethylene, metallocene catalyzed polyethylene copol ymers, ethylene-methacrylate copolymers, ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, ionomer resins and combinations thereof.
13. The film of claim 10, wherein the heat sealable layer comprises a material selected from the group consisting of an ethylene-propylene random copolymer, ethylene-butene-1 copolymer, ethylene-propylene-butene-1 terpolymer, propylene-butene copolymer, low density polyethylene, linear low density polyethylene, very low density polyethylene, metallocene catalyzed polyethylene plastomer, metallocene catalyzed polyethylene, metallocene catalyzed polyethylene copolymers, ethylene-methacrylate copolymer, ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer, ionomer resin and combinations thereof.
14. The film of claim 1, further comprising a core layer.
15. The film of claim 14, wherein the core layer comprises a material selected from the group consisting of isotactic polypropylene homopolymer, syndiotactic polypropylene homopolymer, metallocene catalyzed isotactic polypropylene homopolymer, metallocene catalyzed syndiotactic polypropylene, ethylene-propylene random copolymer, butene-propylene random copolymer, high density polyethylene, low density polyethylene, linear low density polyethylene and combinations thereof.
16. The film of claim 14, wherein the core layer is surface treated with a corona treatment, a flame treatment, atmospheric plasma, or a corona treatment utilizing a mixed gas environment of nitrogen and carbon dioxide.
17. The film of claim 1, wherein a thickness of said skin layer is in a range of about 5% to about 25% of the total thickness of the film.
18. The film of claim 1, wherein a thickness of said skin layer is in a range of about 10% to about 20% of the total thickness of the film.
19. A food packing material comprising a biaxially oriented polyolefin multilayer film of claim 1.
20. The food packaging material of claim 19, wherein a weight percent of the porous particles in said skin layer is in a range of about 0.5 weight percent to about 10 weight percent based on a total weight of the film.
21. The food packaging material of claim 19, wherein a weight percent of the porous particles in said skin layer is in a range of about 1 weight percent to about 5 weight percent based on a total weight of the film.
22. The food packaging material of claim 19, further comprising an adhesive layer.

This application claims priority from Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/315,671 filed Aug. 30, 2001, entitled the same as above, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

The invention relates to polyolefinic multilayer film comprising a core layer of polypropylene and at least one outer layer. More specifically, the invention relates to a biaxially oriented polypropylene film that does not distort in the presence of food oils.

Biaxially oriented polypropylene film laminations are commonly used in the snack food packaging industry. In particular, potato chip packaging is a very large volume application.

In the case of potato chip packaging, oils such as cottonseed oil, corn oil, and soybean oil are present on the potato chip surface. Some of this oil on the potato chip surface transfers to the package's internal surfaces. Similarly, other types of baked food snack products also have oils that are known to swell the polypropylene. Since these food oils are non-polar, the polypropylene film absorbs them quite readily, particularly at elevated temperatures. This absorption of food oils by the film gives a distorted appearance to the entire package by causing dimpling in the film.

This surface distortion effectively destroys the surface gloss of the package and gives the appearance that the package has been mishandled. This distortion is undesirable to snack food manufacturers, as they would like to represent the product as being fresh or new to the shelf.

Oriented polypropylene films currently available on the market have attempted to address this issue in two ways. First, by preventing the migration of the food oils into the polypropylene layer(s) of the film. Second, by stiffening the film such that the distortions are not so visible to the human eye.

Typically, for preventing migration of the food oils to the polypropylene layer(s) of the film, a metallized layer such as an aluminum layer is applied to the inside the film in contact with the food products. The oil does not penetrate though an intact aluminum layer. However, the problems of applying the metallized layer on the inside of the film are the following. First, the metallized layer tends for form cracks through which the oils leak into the polypropylene layer(s) of the film. Second, it is preferred to have the metallized layer on the side of the film that will be the outside surface of the food package. This is because the metallized layer provides a glossy background to the images printed on the surface of the food package.

The stiffening of the film is typically done by adding inorganic fillers such as calcium carbonate, titanium dioxide, etc., to the core layer of the film. The addition of fillers not only provide increased stiffness but could also provide opacity, e.g., by creating voids using CaCO3, and whiteness, e.g., by using TiO2. See, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,303,708 (Gebhardt), 4,377,616 (Ashcraft), 4,632,869 (Park), 4,652,489 (Crass), 5,134,173 (Joesten), and 6,048,608 (Peet). The common features of these patents is that they use fillers in a core layer for creating opacity in the film and have a void-free (non-porous) layer on the surface of the film that would contact the food products.

In short, the approach taken by the prior art references was to incorporate a solid (filler-free), void-free layer at the film surface that would be in contact with the food products. The idea behind the prior art films was the following. If one can prevent migration of the oils from the food products into the film using a solid, void-free layer on the film surface that would be in contact with the food products, then one should be able to minimize migration of oils into the film. Thereby, one can prevent distortion of the film. If distortion is still visible, the prior art films attempted to minimize distortion by stiffening the films by adding fillers to the core layer.

The approach utilized by the prior art films discussed above has the following impacts. It generally does not prevent migration of the oils into the core layer, but the distortion is suppressed by stiffening the film and increasing the thickness of the film. Stiffening the film makes the film heavier and less flexible while increasing the film thickness increases the cost of the film. Therefore, it is the objective of this invention to provide an economical solution to this package distortion problem caused by the oils of the food product being packaged.

FIGS. 1-5 show microphotographs of the surfaces of Examples 1-5.

This invention provides a film that does not distort in the presence of food oils, particularly at elevated temperature conditions. This invention further maintains the necessary properties of the film including oxygen barrier, moisture barrier, cold seal adhesion, and heat seal performance. Achieving these objectives will result in a package with very good surface aesthetics, excellent heat seal or cold seal adhesion performance, and exceptional barrier performance.

As explained above, the prior art structures use fillers to make the film stiff and opaque. In addition, the prior art structures use a void-free layer on the film surface contacting the food products to prevent migration of the food oils into the film.

The applicants of this invention have arrived at a totally counter-intuitive approach than that adopted by the prior art structures to solve the problem of distortion. Applicants have surprisingly found that by creating pores containing porous particles in the skin layer contacting the food products for the purposes of allowing food oils to reside in these porous particles, it is possible to reduce or eliminate film distortion caused by the oils swelling the polypropylene film itself. These porous particles can also exist in the core layer besides the skin layer of the film. More specifically, Applicants found that if at least some of the pores near the surface of the skin layer are open pores such that the porous particles are in contact with the environment surrounding the skin layer, then the food oils preferentially get absorbed by the porous particles as compared to being absorbed by the polymer of the film.

Applicants have successfully produced such a porous particle-containing film structure that is capable of making a finished package product having the following characteristics: 1) strong seals, 2) excellent barrier, 3) excellent lamination bond strength, 4) excellent print quality, and 5) excellent gloss or surface aesthetics.

Applicants have also determined that increasing the thickness of the lamination can reduce this distortion. Thus, increasing the lamination thickness lends additional structural support to the lamination and reduces the distortion of the entire package. However, increasing the thickness of the lamination is uneconomical since consuming more raw materials is always considerably more expensive.

As will be realized, this invention is capable of other and different embodiments, and its details are capable of modifications in various obvious respects, all without departing from this invention. Accordingly, the description is to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not as restrictive.

This invention provides a polyolefin film preferably having at least two layers, including a first skin layer, which is in direct contact with the packaged product. This skin layer could be functional such as a heat seal layer or a cold seal adhesion layer and may also contain porous particles. A core layer, adjacent to the polyolefin skin layer, may also contain porous particles. A second polymeric skin layer may also be incorporated on the opposite side of the core layer from the first skin layer. This second polymeric layer may function as a layer for metallization, printing, adhesive lamination, extrusion lamination and coatings. More particularly preferred is a layer for metallization.

The first polyolefin skin layer can function as a heat-seal layer or a layer for cold seal adhesion. The term heat seal is defined as sealing upon the onset of heat. For a package to cold seal, a cold seal cohesive must be pattern applied by a rotogravure coating process to the cold-seal adhesion skin layer. The term cold seal is defined as sealing a product at room temperature with the application of only pressure.

The porous particles in the skin layer are capable of absorbing oil. The oil-absorbing porous particles can absorb oil due to any mechanism. For example, the oil-absorbing porous particles can absorb oil due the porosity in the particles. The oil-absorbing porous particles can absorb oil due to the capillary action of the porous particles, in which case, the porous particles act like pores in a sponge and soak up the oil. Another reason why the oil-absorbing porous particles can absorb oil is due to adsorption of oil on the surface of the particles themselves.

The term "porous particles" refers to particles containing pores on the surface and/or within the particles. The pores could be open and/or closed pores. If the particles only comprise closed pores, then the diffusion resistance to oils and oil-vapors through the particles should be substantially lower than the diffusion resistance to oils and oil-vapors in polyolefin polymers.

The porous particles should be exposed to the environment surrounding the skin layer. The porous particles could be exposed to the environment when the porous particles are protruding out from the surface of the skin layer exposed to the environment. Another way the porous particles could be exposed to the environment is when the porous particles are completely within the skin layer, but the skin layer contains openings in the skin in the vicinity of the porous particles such that oils and/or oil vapors could diffuse through the openings to the porous particles.

It has also been considered that the absorbed food oils that are in direct contact with the skin layer will reside in these porous particles. It is also considered that the porosity of the solid particles themselves will attract oil away from the polypropylene matrix. Thus, the oil and oil-vapors will choose the path of least resistance and reside on and/or within the porous particles. Since the outer layer is very thin in relation to the core layer, only a small amount of porous particles are needed in the skin layer and still allow the porous particles to be in fluid contact with the environment and, therefore, exposed to the environment surrounding the film layer. Thus, a small amount of porous particles in the skin layer have been found very effective in overcoming the swelling of a polypropylene-containing film for food packaging.

The core layer can also be loaded with porous particles in conjunction with the skin layer. It is considered that food oils that have not been absorbed by the porous particles of the outermost skin will be absorbed by the porous particles of the core layer. Since the oil will now reside in the porous particles, swelling of the polyolefin film will not occur. As a consequence, the film will not be distorted and thus the flexible package will not be distorted.

The core layer can be any polyolefin polymer that can be uniaxially or biaxially oriented. Such polymers include but are not limited to: isotactic polypropylene homopolymer, syndiotactic polypropylene homopolymer, metallocene catalyzed isotactic polypropylene homopolymer, metallocene catalyzed syndiotactic polypropylene, ethylene-propylene random copolymer, butene-propylene random copolymer, high density polyethylene, low density polyethylene, linear low density polyethylene and blends thereof. Most preferred is a core layer of an isotactic polypropylene homopolymer resin. The isotactic polypropylene resin can be defined as having a melt flow in the range of 1-9 g/10 min. More particularly preferred is a melt flow rate in the range of 1-5 g/10 min. Most particularly preferred is a melt flow rate in the range of 1-3 g/10 min.

The core layer can be surface treated with either a standard corona treatment, flame treatment, atmospheric plasma, or a special corona treatment utilizing a mixed gas environment of nitrogen and carbon dioxide. Most particularly, a surface treatment consisting of a special corona treatment utilizing a mixed gas environment of nitrogen and carbon dioxide is preferred. This core layer can then be directly metallized, printed, coated, adhesive laminated, or extrusion laminated. Most particularly preferred is metallization of the core layer.

The skin layer could be a cold seal adhesion layer. The cold seal adhesion layer can be composed of any of the following and blends thereof: an isotactic polypropylene homopolymer, syndiotactic polypropylene homopolymer, metallocene catalyzed isotactic polypropylene homopolymer, metallocene catalyzed syndiotactic polypropylene homopolymer, ethylene-propylene random copolymer, butene-propylene random copolymer, ethylene-propylene-butene-1 terpolymer, low density polyethylene, linear low density polyethylene, very low density polyethylene, metallocene catalyzed polyethylene, metallocene catalyzed polyethylene copolymers, ethylene-methacrylate copolymers, ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, and ionomer resins.

This cold seal adhesion layer can be surface treated with either a standard corona treatment, flame treatment, atmospheric plasma, or a special corona treatment utilizing a mixed gas environment of nitrogen and carbon dioxide. Most particularly preferred is corona treatment.

The skin layer could be a heat sealable layer. The heat seal layer can be composed of any of the following and blends thereof: an ethylene-propylene random copolymer, ethylene-butene-1 copolymer, ethylene-propylene-butene-1 terpolymer, propylene-butene copolymer, low density polyethylene, linear low density polyethylene, very low density polyethylene, metallocene catalyzed polyethylene plastomer, metallocene catalyzed polyethylene, metallocene catalyzed polyethylene copolymers, ethylene-methacrylate copolymer, ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer and ionomer resin.

One aspect of this invention is the oil absorptive properties of porous particles either in the polypropylene core layer, in a skin layer adjacent to the core layer, or both. These porous particles absorb the oil first rather than allowing the oil to swell the polypropylene and distort the film as a consequence. Calcium carbonate is a preferred particle because of its particle shape, particle size, low cost, and availability. However any particle may be used which contains pores in it. In general, the particles should be round in shape and approximately greater than 1 micron in average diameter. The particles can be either organic or inorganic. It is obvious that inorganic particles such as calcium carbonate, silicone dioxide, amorphous silica, sodium aluminosilicate and activated carbon can be used since these will not melt at polyolefin extrusion and orienting temperatures. However, organic particles can be used that are incompatible with the matrix polyolefin material. Such organic particles must either be crosslinked, have a higher melting temperature than the matrix olefin material, or if amorphous must have a higher glass transition temperature than the melting temperature of the olefin matrix material.

80 gauge biaxially oriented polypropylene (BOPP) films were manufactured on a 1.5-meter wide BOPP production line. The skin layer was measured at 8 gauge units. The skin layer used an ethylene-butene-propylene terpolymer having a density of 0.9 gm/cc and a melt flow rate of 9.5g/10 min as measured by ASTM D1238. Different weight percent of calcium carbonate was added to this skin layer as shown in Table 1. The density of calcium carbonate was 2.74 g/cc. The average particle size of the skin layer was about 1 micron. The skin layer also contained 4,000 ppm by weight of Tospearl particles, which are cross-linked silicone particles of 2-micron diameter and a density of 1.32 g/cc. Isotactic polypropylene resin was used in the core layer. The melt flow rate of the core isotactic polypropylene homopolymer was 1.6 g/10 min. The films were heated to 135°C C., stretched 5 times in the machine direction, cooled, introduced into a tenter oven, heated to 164°C C., stretched to 9 times in the transverse direction and cooled.

The films were metallized in a Shimadzu bell jar metallizer that evaporated aluminum on the core side of the film. Potato chips were then crushed into small pieces. Ten grams of the crushed potato chips were weighed and placed in a 9.6 in2 surface area on the skin layer side of the film. The samples were next placed in a convection oven at 115°C C. for 3 and 6 hours respectively. The crushed chips and oil were then cleaned from the surface with isopropyl alcohol. The samples were evaluated qualitatively for film distortion by seeing the amount of dimpling occurring in the film. A rating of 5 was given for the worst distortion and a rating of 0 was given for a sample that has no distortion. Thus, the data in Table 1 is based on this relative ranking system.

TABLE 1
Distortion in Samples Tested
Distortion
Weight percent After 3 After 6
of CaCO3 in the Calculated density hours at hours
skin layer of the film 115°C C. at 115°C C.
Example 1 0 0.900 3 4
(Control)
Example 2 2.5 0.902 3 4
Example 3 5 0.903 3 4
Example 4 10 0.907 2.5 3.5
Example 5 15 0.909 2 2.5

Table 1 shows that the distortion in the film of Example 1 (no porous particles) and in the films of Examples 2 and 3 (with 2.5 and 5 weigh percent CaCO3) was equally bad after testing for distortion. The distortions in the films of Examples 4 and 5 (with 10 and 15 weight percent CaCO3) were much less than those of the films of Examples 1-3 after testing for distortion.

These unexpected results could be explained by examining the microphotographs of the skin layer surface of the films of Examples 1-5 in FIGS. 1-5. FIG. 1 shows Tospearl particles of 2-micron diameter. FIGS. 2 and 3 show Tospearl particles and CaCO3 particles with substantially all CaCO3 particles being covered by the polymer of the skin layer. On the other hand, FIGS. 4 and 5 show a totally different topography. FIGS. 4 and 5 show a substantial number of CaCO3 particles located within a "crater" but exposed to the environment without any skin layer covering the CaCO3 particles. Applicants unexpectedly found that when a substantial number of CaCO3 particles are exposed to the environment, these CaCO3 particles are in fluid contact with the oils and oil-vapors of the food. Thus, these exposed CaCO3 particles act as localized sponges on the surface of the skin layer that absorb oils and oil-vapors.

The density data in Table 1 is worth noting for the following reasons. First, the CaCO3 particles are located in the skin layer, which is only a fraction of the total thickness of the film, even 15 weight percent of CaCO3 particles only increases the film density by about 1 percent. Second, the thickness of the skin layer is about 10% the total thickness of the film, 15 weight percent of CaCO3 particles in the skin layer amounts to about 1.5 weight percent of CaCO3 particles on the basis of the total weight of the film. Further increase in the weight percent of the CaCO3 particles in the skin layer is expected to further improve the distortion performance of the film. Thus, Applicants recognized that with a negligible increase in film density and stiffness, the film of the claimed invention has significantly improved distortion performance by adding CaCO3 particles in the range of about 10 to about 50 weight percent CaCO3 particles on the basis of the total weight of the skin layer, which would typically be about 0.5 to about 10 weight percent CaCO3 particles on the basis of the total weight of the film. Furthermore, Applicants recognized that the larger the CaCO3 particles as compared to the thickness of the skin layer, the greater is the propensity for the CaCO3 particles to protrude above the surface of the skin layer exposed to the environment. This allows the CaCO3 particles to be exposed to the environment at even lower weight percent than 10 weight percent shown in Table 1.

The above description is presented to enable a person skilled in the art to make and use the invention, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the preferred embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, this invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.

This application discloses several numerical range limitations. Persons skilled in the art would recognize that the numerical ranges disclosed inherently support any range within the disclosed numerical ranges even though a precise range limitation is not stated verbatim in the specification because this invention can be practiced throughout the disclosed numerical ranges. A holding to the contrary would "let form triumph over substance" and allow the written description requirement to eviscerate claims that might be narrowed during prosecution simply because the applicants broadly disclose in this application but then might narrow their claims during prosecution. Finally, the entire disclosure of the priority documents, patents and publications referred in this application are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

Su, Tien-Kuei, Moreau, Leo, Kitchin, Kevin

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10111888, May 13 2011 ACERUS BIOPHARMA INC Intranasal 0.15% and 0.24% testosterone gel formulations and use thereof for treating anorgasmia or hypoactive sexual desire disorder
10322567, Dec 15 2011 U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Closure for container
10668084, May 13 2011 ACERUS BIOPHARMA INC Intranasal lower dosage strength testosterone gel formulations and use thereof for treating anorgasmia or hypoactive sexual desire disorder
11090312, Mar 15 2013 Acerus Biopharma Inc. Methods of treating hypogonadism with transnasal testerosterone bio-adhesive gel formulations in male with allergic rhinitis, and methods for preventing an allergic rhinitis event
11744838, Mar 15 2013 Acerus Biopharma Inc. Methods of treating hypogonadism with transnasal testosterone bio-adhesive gel formulations in male with allergic rhinitis, and methods for preventing an allergic rhinitis event
8609043, Jul 29 2001 M ET P PHARMA AG Use of a container of an inorganic additive containing plastic material
9403347, Dec 15 2011 U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Peelable closure for container
9757388, May 13 2011 Acerus Pharmaceuticals SRL Intranasal methods of treating women for anorgasmia with 0.6% and 0.72% testosterone gels
9801834, Oct 04 2006 M ET P PHARMA AG Controlled release delivery system for nasal application of neurotransmitters
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4663216, Jun 18 1984 OJI-YUKA SYNTHETIC PAPER CO , LTD Synthetic paper printable in high gloss
4701369, Apr 23 1986 Mobil Oil Corporation Opaque polymer film laminate having an absorbent surface
5397635, Oct 11 1991 Mobil Oil Corporation Multi-layer high opacity film structure of improved whiteness and machinability
5667872, May 30 1994 Oji Yuka Goseishi Co., Ltd. Synthetic paper with multi-layer structure and excellent printing property
20010036542,
WO9849003,
///////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Aug 28 2002SU, TIEN-KUEITORAY PLASTICS AMERICA , INC CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE SPELLING OF THE SECOND NAMED INVENTOR S NAME AND TO CORRECT THE CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS, PREVIOSULY RECORDED AT REEL 013255, FRAME 0299 0135740855 pdf
Aug 28 2002MOREAU, LEOTORAY PLASTICS AMERICA , INC CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE SPELLING OF THE SECOND NAMED INVENTOR S NAME AND TO CORRECT THE CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS, PREVIOSULY RECORDED AT REEL 013255, FRAME 0299 0135740855 pdf
Aug 28 2002KITCHIN, KEVINTORAY PLASTICS AMERICA , INC CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE SPELLING OF THE SECOND NAMED INVENTOR S NAME AND TO CORRECT THE CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS, PREVIOSULY RECORDED AT REEL 013255, FRAME 0299 0135740855 pdf
Aug 28 2002SU, TIEN-KUEITORAY PLASTICS AMERICA , INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0132550299 pdf
Aug 28 2002MOREAU, LOETORAY PLASTICS AMERICA , INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0132550299 pdf
Aug 28 2002KITCHIN, KEVINTORAY PLASTICS AMERICA , INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0132550299 pdf
Aug 29 2002Toray Plastics, Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Apr 04 2008M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Mar 28 2012M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Mar 23 2016M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Oct 05 20074 years fee payment window open
Apr 05 20086 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Oct 05 2008patent expiry (for year 4)
Oct 05 20102 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Oct 05 20118 years fee payment window open
Apr 05 20126 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Oct 05 2012patent expiry (for year 8)
Oct 05 20142 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Oct 05 201512 years fee payment window open
Apr 05 20166 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Oct 05 2016patent expiry (for year 12)
Oct 05 20182 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)