A method and system for monitoring service quality in a restaurant are disclosed. Multiple sensor modules are installed at each table of a restaurant for detecting restaurant customer service related information. The detected restaurant customer service related information is transmitted, preferably, over-the-air to a central computer unit having a receiver for receiving the detected restaurant customer service related information transmitted by the sensor modules over-the-air. A display monitor, coupled to the central computer unit, can be utilized to display the detected restaurant customer service related information received by the receiver to a restaurant manager in a real-time basis regardless of whether the restaurant manager is present at the restaurant or at a remote location.
|
1. A monitoring system for supporting management of an establishment, said monitoring system comprising:
a plurality of detectors placed at each of a plurality of locations for detecting customer service related information and for transmitting said detected customer service related information, wherein one of said plurality of detectors is a patron counter; a central computer unit having a receiver for receiving said detected customer service related information transmitted by said plurality of detectors; and a display monitor, coupled to said central computer unit, for displaying said detected customer service related information received by said transceiver to a manager of said establishment on a real-time basis.
12. A method for monitoring service quality of a restaurant, said method comprising the steps of:
mounting a patron presence detector and a staff presence detector at a table within a restaurant; detecting a patron present at said table utilizing said patron presence detector; in response to said detected patron presence, transmitting a patron presence signal to a central computer, wherein said patron presence signal includes a table number of said table; detecting a staff member present at said table utilizing said staff presence detector; in response to said detected staff presence, transmitting a staff presence signal to said central computer; and displaying an indicia representing a time lapse between said patron presence signal and said staff presence signal at said central computer.
18. A monitoring system for monitoring service quality of a restaurant, said monitoring system comprising:
means for mounting a patron presence detector and a staff presence detector at a table within a restaurant; means for detecting a patron present at said table utilizing said patron presence detector; means for transmitting a patron presence signal to a central computer, in response to said detected patron presence, wherein said patron presence signal includes a table number of said table; means for detecting a staff present at said table utilizing said staff presence detector; means for transmitting a staff presence signal to said central computer, in response to said detected staff presence; and means for displaying an indicia representing a time lapse between said patron presence signal and said staff presence signal at said central computer.
2. The monitoring system of
3. The monitoring system of
4. The monitoring system of
6. The monitoring system of
9. The monitoring system of
10. The monitoring system of
11. The monitoring system of
13. The method of
14. The method of
mounting a patron counter at said table; and counting the number of patrons present at said table utilizing said patron counter.
15. The method of
16. The method of
17. The method of
19. The monitoring system of
20. The monitoring system of
21. The monitoring system of
22. The monitoring system of
23. The monitoring system of
|
1. Technical Field
The present invention relates to a method and system for providing management support-in general, and in particular to a method and system for providing management support for restaurants. Still more particularly, the present invention relates to a method and system for monitoring and improving service quality of a restaurant.
2. Description of the Prior Art
The impression of a customer's visit to a restaurant depends not only on the food quality of the restaurant but also on the level of service delivered by the employees of the restaurant. When evaluating a restaurant, a customer may factor in how long it takes to be seated at a table, how long it takes for a wait staff to greet and take an order from the customer, how long it takes for the food to arrive at the customer's table, how long it takes for the wait staff to respond to common requests such as beverage refills, bread refills, etc., and how long it takes the wait staff to deliver the check to the customer's table. Thus, in order to ensure total customer satisfaction, a restaurant must provide relatively high quality in both its food and service.
The labor force in a typical restaurant, like most other service-oriented businesses, typically suffers from a very high turnover rate, which usually leads to little formal training for most restaurant employees. In addition, when there are multiple restaurants involved, an executive manager, who oversees such restaurants but infrequently visits the premises, has very little information on the day-to-day operations of each restaurant. The executive manager most likely receives only periodic and second-hand information from lower level managers who may have received the data from even lower level supervisors. As a result, there is an undesirable disconnection between the executive manager and the day-to-day operations of the restaurants such that the executive manager is not optimally equipped with information to efficiently apply his/her experience and knowledge to the day-to-day operations of the restaurants. Thus, the executive manager's extensive experience and knowledge are not effectively utilized, and as a result, the performance of the restaurant is less than optimal.
Moreover, while the process sequence at an individual table, such as seating, ordering, serving, bill presentation, and payment, is relatively predictable, the variable process start point at each table, combined with the variable duration of each process step, create a service management nightmare. Consequently, it would be desirable to provide a method and system to monitor various service qualities of a restaurant such that any manager of the restaurant can benefit from the collected and displayed information to provide better control and management of their employees throughout the day-to-day operations of the restaurant.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, multiple sensor modules are installed at each table of a restaurant for detecting restaurant customer service related information. The detected restaurant customer service related information is transmitted, preferably over-the-air, to a central computer unit having a receiver for receiving the detected restaurant customer service related information transmitted by the sensor modules over-the-air. A display monitor, coupled to the central computer unit, can be utilized to display the detected restaurant customer service related information received by the receiver, and the management/decision information derived thereform, to a manager on a real-time basis regardless of whether the manager is present at the restaurant or at a remote location.
All objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become apparent in the following detailed written description.
The invention itself, as well as a preferred mode of use, further objects, and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
A. System Overview
Referring now to the drawings and in particular to
Each of sensor modules 15a-15e is capable of sensing or capturing a specific type information. Several examples of sensor modules will be further described in details infra. The information detected by sensor modules 15a-15e are continuously or periodically transmitted to central computer 11 via receiver 13. Sensor modules 15a-15e communicate with central computer 11 via receiver 13 preferably over the air so that no cable or wiring is required. For example, the TMI wireless transmitter module manufactured by Glolab Corporation may be used to transmit detected signals from sensor modules 15a-15e to central computer 11. Other well-known wireless technologies may also be used for the transmission of data from sensor modules 15a-15e to central computer 11. A frequency preferably in the range of 400 MHz to 2500 MHz is utilized for data transmissions to minimize interference.
In a restaurant environment, sensor modules, such as sensor module 15a, are installed at each table, preferably hidden from the view of patrons, such as under the table. Each sensor module, which includes at least a detector (or sensor), can gather a specific type of information related to the performance and operations of a restaurant. The collected data are then sent to central computer 11 to be stored in a database within central computer 11. Within central computer 11, there are two types of data storage for the collected data. The first type of data storage allows the storing of the most recently collected data by continuously overwriting the previously collected data. A circular buffer may be used for this type of data storage. The second type of data storage occurs as a response to an exception. When a predetermined threshold or range is exceeded, central computer 11 may respond by storing all or a subset of the data for a predetermined period of time. Information in the data bases may be transmitted via Internet 14 to a remote location for storage or access.
B. Detecting Patron Presence
One example of a sensor module is a patron presence detector. With reference now to
Patron presence detector 20 is capable of detecting motion in such a way as to likely correspond with the arrival of a patron. Once patron presence has been established, such information is transmitted to receiver 13 (from
A "patron present" signal preferably includes a header and a body. The header may be an 8-bit pattern that is distinguishable from RF random noise or white noise within a restaurant. The body may be of any length and may include information such as a unique table number (obtained from register 26) in addition to a "patron present" indicator.
In order to avoid false detections, patron presence detector 20 requires multiple detections within a predetermined period before sending a "patron present" signal. For example, if subsequent motion is detected within a predetermined period of time after the first detection, patron presence detector 20 can conclude that a patron is at the table. Otherwise, if no motion is detected within the predetermined period of time after the first detection, patron presence detector 20 can conclude that a false detection has occurred such that no "patron present" signal will be sent.
Patron presence detector 20 is also capable of operating in such a way as to minimize energy usage such that battery operation is possible without requiring an inordinate amount of battery checking, charging, or changing. For example, after the transmission of a "patron present" signal, the patron detector may enter a hibernation mode for a period of time that is considered the minimum reasonable amount of time a patron would stay at a particular table. This is because if it is known that a patron or patrons typically stay at a specific restaurant for a minimum of, say, 45 minutes, then once it has been established that the patron or patrons had sat down at a table, then there is no reason for the patron detector to actively operate during the 45-minute period. During the hibernation mode, patron presence detector 20 may check every 10 minutes or so to ensure the patron or patrons are still there at the table, and once the patron presence is confirmed, hibernation mode may be resumed. If not confirmed, a "patron no longer present" signal may be sent.
C. Counting Patrons
Patron presence detector 20 may also be modified to become a patron counter for counting individual patrons. This is accomplished by replacing motion sensor 22 with an IR transceiver. Referring now to
Referring now to
With reference now to
D. Detecting Staff Presence
Another example of a sensor module is a staff presence detector. With reference now to
Staff transmitter 46 preferably transmits a rapidly attenuating (with predictable attenuation) RF signal. Rapid attenuation is important because the RF signal being transmitted by a staff member can be successfully received and decoded at any number of receivers, such as receiver 42, when in close proximity thereto, but it should only be accepted at a receiver where it is desired to detect the staff member. In other words, the staff member should only be detected at one table-instead of several tables at the same time. Specifically, the staff member should only be detected at one particular table at which the staff member is attending at a particular time. If the staff member is not attending any table, the staff member should not be detected at any table. The staff detection is accomplished by sending a RF signal that attenuates discernably after transmitting only a few feet. Accordingly, by comparing a signal received by receiver 42, which preferably includes a signal strength indicator, with a previously established threshold signal strength level, a staff member, such as a waiter, can only be recognized when the staff member is within a few feet (such as within three feet) of receiver 42, thereby indicating the staff member is attending to a particular table.
Included within the RF signal is a standard packet identifier that distinguishes the transmission from RF random noise or white noise that may be received by receiver 42, along with some information that identifies a specific waiter and any other information that may be desirable to transmit from a staff member, along with any other packet identifier, check sum or other method of designating that the transmission is complete and that the transmission packet has been properly received.
After confirming the presence of a staff member, staff presence detector 40 transmits a "staff present" signal to central computer 11 (from FIG. 1). The "staff present" signal preferably includes a header and a body. The header may be an 8-bit pattern that is distinguishable from RF random noise or white noise. The body may be of any length and may include information such as a table number, a staff member type (such as waiter, bus boy, manager, etc.), a staff number, etc.
Through the combined use of patron presence detector 20 (from
E. Patron Survey Pad
Yet another example of a sensor module is a patron survey pad that can relate to central computer 11 (from
Patron survey pad 50 preferably transmits a "survey information" signal that is associated with the survey information selected by a patron. To a specific query, the response may include, for example, Excellent, Good, Average, and Poor. The "survey information" signal transmitted by patron survey pad 50 depends on which button of keypad 52 the patron presses. There could be any number of possible queries and possible responses. After a response has been entered by the patron, patron survey pad 50 transmits a "survey information" signal to receiver 42 (from FIG. 4), and transmitter 43 (from
A "survey information" signal preferably includes a header and a body. The header may be an 8-bit pattern that is distinguishable from RF random noise or white noise. The body may be any length to include information such as survey result from a patron along with the table number, etc.
There are many methods in which staff information can be associated with the "survey information" signal. The preferred method is to utilize the table number at which a staff member has previously been identified as the server for that table, and stored within central computer 11.
With reference now to
Starting at block 60, a determination is made, by a patron presence detector, as to whether or not a patron is present at a table, as shown in block 61. The polling continues until a patron is detected at the table. Once a patron presence is detected, the patrons are counted and a "patron present" signal is transmitted to a central computer, as depicted in block 62, and a staff presence detector is activated, as illustrated in block 63. The "patron present" signal may include a table number and the number of patrons.
Next, another determination is made, by the staff presence detector, as to whether or not a staff member is present at the table, as shown in block 64. The polling continues until a staff member is detected at the table. Once staff presence is detected, a "staff present" signal is transmitted to the central computer, as depicted in block 65. The "staff present" signal should include at least a staff type, such as waiter, bus boy, manager, etc., a staff number and the table number.
After this point, the patrons should be placing their orders, waiting for their food, consuming their food, etc. Once the meal has been completed, the patrons are presented with a check for the meal along with a patron survey pad. The patrons then have an opportunity to enter information according to the questions presented on the patron survey pad. The survey information from the patrons is then sent to the receiver at the table. After a "survey information" signal has been received by the receiver at the table, as shown in block 66, a table number is then added, and the "survey information" signal is subsequently transmitted from the table to the central computer, as depicted in block 67. The "survey information" signal should include at least the table number and the result of the survey. Since a staff member has previously been associated with the table number, the survey result can be associated with the appropriate staff member by simply utilizing the table number. The receipt of the "survey information" signal at the table is an indication that the meal is finished and the table is about to be vacated.
Before the presentation of the bill and the patron survey pad, the staff presence detector can be utilized to detect each time the staff attends to at a table, as shown in block 64. The number of "staff present" signals indicates the attentiveness of the staff, and such information can be displayed at the central computer for restaurant management purposes. Finally, a determination is made as to whether or not patrons are still sitting at the table, as depicted in block 68. The table is assumed to be vacated when patrons are not detected at the table.
As has been described, the present invention provides a method and system for monitoring service quality in a restaurant. With the present invention, it is possible to know unobtrusively when and how many restaurant patrons are seated at a table, how long they are present at the table, and when they are being tended to by a staff member. These types of information can be organized in such a way as to assist a restaurant manager in his/her decision making process. For example, through the application of some form of audio or visual alarms, a quick look at a computer monitor could alert the restaurant manager to a potential customer service problem in the making. Moreover, by allowing internet access to this information, the appropriate executives located off-site can be alerted to situations that require attention. In addition, historical data on server attentiveness may be useful in training and evaluating wait staff. For example, it may be useful to be able to present the wait staff with staff attentiveness information on a person-by-person basis. Also, as it is generally accepted that staff attentiveness is both a hallmark of a good wait staff but also a key contributor to the success of a restaurant, it may be useful to track staff attentiveness against restaurant sales to ascertain if sales trends can be attributed to changes in staff attentiveness. It is understood by those skilled in the art that the above-mentioned information can be combined with other technology that is readily accessible, such as video cameras, point-of-sale systems, etc., to extend their benefits.
Although only four types of sensor modules are described in the present disclosure, other types of sensor modules that include cameras, temperature sensors, current detectors, etc., can be utilized to further the benefits of the present invention.
The present invention may also be applicable to any service-oriented businesses that are highly dependent on their employees to perform a service for their patrons. Examples of these types of service-oriented businesses include hotels, daycare centers, nursing homes, assisted living centers, automotive repair shops, drug stores, health clubs, banking institutions, and hair salons. Other businesses relying on its labor force to a lesser degree, such as retail merchandise outlets, grocery stores, and supermarkets, will also benefit from better training, management, monitoring and-management support of its employees.
It is also important to note that although the present invention has been described in the context of a fully functional computer system, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the mechanisms of the present invention are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that the present invention applies equally regardless of the particular type of signal bearing media utilized to actually carry out the distribution. Examples of signal bearing media include, without limitation, recordable type media such as floppy disks or CD ROMs and transmission type media such as analog or digital communications links.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10034123, | Nov 18 2011 | Ambient condition measurement and reporting system | |
10217174, | Sep 23 2015 | International Business Machines Corporation | Real-time wait estimation and prediction via embedded sensors |
10362462, | Nov 18 2011 | Ambient condition measurement and reporting system | |
10832356, | Sep 23 2015 | International Business Machines Corporation | Real-time wait estimation and prediction via embedded sensors |
7026916, | Oct 14 2003 | Tabletop signaling device for restaurants | |
7471692, | Jan 17 2002 | UTSTARCOM, INC | Method and apparatus for maximizing call connect rate in a remote access application |
7978055, | Dec 05 2006 | Virtual mesero POS table | |
8412579, | Dec 18 2007 | Recipes management system | |
8923556, | Dec 17 2011 | Symbol Technologies, LLC | Method and apparatus for detecting people within video frames based upon multiple colors within their clothing |
9319470, | May 30 2012 | Location-based social networking system |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4236147, | Dec 09 1977 | Automatic doorbell | |
4612535, | Nov 01 1984 | Add-on alert system | |
4800540, | Dec 04 1986 | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE, AS REPRESENTED BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY | Discriminating ultrasonic proximity detection system |
4976337, | Jun 11 1987 | Formula Systems Limited | Proximity detection systems |
5278764, | Jan 29 1990 | Nissan Motor Company, Limited | Automatic braking system with proximity detection to a preceding vehicle |
5495077, | Jun 08 1992 | Synaptics, Inc. | Object position and proximity detector |
5680879, | Sep 12 1994 | LIBERTY PARTNERS LENDERS, L L C ; AMERICAN CAPITAL STRATEGIES, LTD , ITS LENDER; AMERICAN CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC , ITS AGENT; LIBERTY PARTNERS LENDERS, L L C , ITS LENDER | Automatic flush valve actuation apparatus for replacing manual flush handles |
5793309, | Aug 14 1996 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Short range electromagnetic proximity detection |
5829782, | Mar 31 1993 | Automotive Technologies International, Inc. | Vehicle interior identification and monitoring system |
5900801, | Feb 27 1998 | Food Safety Solutions Corp. | Integral master system for monitoring food service requirements for compliance at a plurality of food service establishments |
5939974, | Feb 27 1998 | Food Safety Solutions Corp. | System for monitoring food service requirements for compliance at a food service establishment |
6169938, | Dec 08 1995 | Gilbarco Inc | Transponder communication of ORVR presence |
6369719, | Oct 28 1996 | FIRST-CLASS MONITORING, LLC | Apparatus and method for collecting and transmitting utility meter data and other information via a wireless network |
6429812, | Jan 27 1998 | Mobile communication device | |
6542076, | Jun 08 1993 | JOAO CONTROL & MONITORING SYSTEMS, LLC | Control, monitoring and/or security apparatus and method |
20010022615, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Dec 07 2000 | MCKEE, PHILIP R | DIGIBOT, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 011366 | /0758 | |
Dec 13 2000 | Praxis Technology Group, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Dec 13 2000 | DIGIBOT, INC | PRAXIS TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012703 | /0780 | |
Feb 14 2003 | PRAXIS TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC | APPLIANCE SCIENTIFIC, INC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023973 | /0708 | |
May 13 2011 | APPLIANCE SCIENTIFIC, INC | JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS AGENT | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 026465 | /0001 | |
Mar 03 2016 | JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | APPLIANCE SCIENTIFIC, INC | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 037898 | /0640 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Apr 08 2008 | M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
Jun 11 2012 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Oct 26 2012 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 26 2007 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 26 2008 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 26 2008 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 26 2010 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 26 2011 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 26 2012 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 26 2012 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 26 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 26 2015 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 26 2016 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 26 2016 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 26 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |