A disk drive suspension having a minimized 2nd torsion characteristic includes a load beam having a given side profile and centerline rotation axis. The load beam has a base portion, a spring portion, and a beam portion. The beam portion has a distal section supporting a flexure having a tongue. There is a dimple between the tongue and the load beam, and a slider carried on the tongue for gimballing movement about the dimple. The dimple has a given height that displaces said beam portion so that the beam portion side profile is biased from said centerline rotation axis. A bend is placed in the beam portion distal section of a size and location to offset the displacement of the beam portion by the dimple while maintaining the beam portion before said distal section straight. Thus, the beam portion side profile registers with the centerline rotation axis and its 2nd torsion characteristic is minimized.
|
1. A disk drive suspension having a minimized 2nd torsion characteristic, said suspension comprising a load beam having a given side profile and centerline rotation axis and comprising a base portion, a spring portion, and a beam portion, said beam portion having a distal section supporting a flexure having a tongue, a dimple between said tongue and said load beam, and a slider carried on said tongue for gimballing movement about said dimple, said dimple having a given height that displaces said beam portion so that the beam portion side profile is biased from said centerline rotation axis, said beam portion distal section having a bend of a size and location to offset the displacement of said beam portion by said dimple while maintaining said beam portion straight before said distal section, whereby said beam portion side profile registers with its said centerline rotation axis and its 2nd torsion characteristic is minimized.
2. A method for minimizing 2nd torsion characteristic in a disk drive suspension, said suspension comprising a load beam having a given side profile and centerline rotation axis and comprising a base portion, a spring portion, and a beam portion, including providing said beam portion with a distal section, supporting a flexure having a tongue on said distal section, providing a dimple between said tongue and said load beam, providing a slider carried on said tongue for gimballing movement about said dimple, giving said dimple a height that displaces said beam portion so that the beam portion side profile is biased from said centerline rotation axis, and providing in said beam portion distal section a bend of a size and location to offset the displacement of said beam portion by said dimple while maintaining said beam portion straight before said distal section to register said beam portion side profile with its said centerline rotation axis and thereby minimize its 2nd torsion characteristic.
|
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/387,974, filed Jun. 10, 2002.
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to disk drive suspensions, and, more particularly, to suspension load beam designs that minimize second torsion gains through the aligning of the load beam side profile with the rotation centerline of the suspension.
2. Description of the Related Art
The dimple used to provide a gimballing action of the slider carried by a flexure tongue has a given height and tends with that height to bias the beam portion of the load beam out of coincidence of the load beam side profile and centerline rotation axis. This bias prevents the minimization of the 2nd torsion characteristic.
It is an object therefore of the invention to provide a suspension having a minimized 2nd torsion characteristic. It is an object to provide such a suspension in which the dimple height is retained. It is a further object to adjust the suspension load beam locally to overcome the deflection and bias that the dimple height introduces into the beam portion while retaining the major portion of the beam portion straight. Another object is to reshape the distal section of the beam portion immediately adjacent the slider to accommodate the dimple height without losing straightness in the major length of the beam portion, and to maintain nearly coincident the beam portion side profile and the centerline axis of rotation, thus to minimize the 2nd torsion characteristic.
These and other objects of the invention are realized in a disk drive suspension having a minimized 2nd torsion characteristic, the suspension comprising a load beam having a given side profile and centerline rotation axis and comprising a base portion, a spring portion, and a beam portion, the beam portion having a distal section supporting a flexure having a tongue, a dimple between the tongue and the load beam, and a slider carried on the tongue for gimballing movement about the dimple, the dimple having a given height that displaces the beam portion so that the beam portion side profile is biased from the centerline rotation axis, the beam portion distal section having a bend of a size and location to offset the displacement of the beam portion by the dimple while maintaining the beam portion straight before the distal section, whereby the beam portion side profile registers with the centerline rotation axis and its 2nd torsion characteristic is minimized.
In its method aspects, the invention provides a method for minimizing 2nd torsion characteristic in a disk drive suspension, the suspension comprising a load beam having a given side profile and centerline rotation axis and comprising a base portion, a spring portion, and a beam portion, including providing said beam portion with a distal section, supporting a flexure having a tongue on the distal section, providing a dimple between the tongue and the load beam, providing a slider carried on the tongue for gimballing movement about the dimple, giving the dimple a height that displaces the beam portion so that the beam portion side profile is biased from the centerline rotation axis, and providing in the beam portion distal section a bend of a size and location to offset the displacement of the beam portion by the dimple while maintaining the beam portion straight before the distal section to register the beam portion side profile with its centerline rotation axis and thereby minimize its 2nd torsion characteristic.
The invention will be further described in conjunction with the attached drawings in which:
It is desirable in disk drive suspension design to minimize the gain for 1st and 2nd torsion with the constraint that resonance frequency cannot be infinitely high. Thus, the practical objective assumes a reasonably acceptable resonance frequency and seeks as low a 1st and 2nd torsion gain as is possible given the resonance frequency. 2nd torsion gain is high in some suspensions because the center of gravity of the suspension is not coincident with the rotation centerline of suspension, but is offset therefrom. This causes an unbalanced mass in the suspension. An unbalanced mass drives the suspension to produce off track motion in the head (slider).
The elimination of the offset between the suspension side profile and the suspension rotation (pivot) axes will provide a desirably low gain for both the 1 stand 2nd torsion. If the rotation axis passes through the center of mass of the suspension, there will be no off-track motion for the torsion mode frequency. In addition it is desirable to minimize the moment of inertia about the suspension longitudinal axis, the axis between the dimple and the spring portion beginning location considered as the mount plate edge.
There are technical problems in optimizing the side profile, including:
Attempting to form the suspension, especially the load beam, with regard only to the suspension rotation axis, likely results in a non-coincidence between the rotation axis and the side profile axis, introducing a bias between the profile and rotation axes and result in off track motion for the torsional mode frequencies.
In the present invention, in addition to forming in the suspension spring area, further forming operations are employed in the beam portion with a view to optimizing the suspension side profile axis relative to the suspension rotation axis profile to minimize bias between the suspension profile and the suspension rotation center.
A suspension according to the invention is shown in
In each case, the suspension 1-10, 2-10 and 3-10 is bent at two different locations, first in the spring area 1-12, 2-12 and 3-12 as is generally known, and secondly at 1-16, 2-16 and 3-16 in the load beam rigid body or beam area 1-14, 2-14 and 3-14. The load beam 1-14, 2-14 and 3-14 can be with rail or without a stiffening edge rail. If there is no edge rail, the consequent sag bend close to the slider will be useful in achieving the purposes of the invention.
In accordance with the invention, the beam 1-14, 2-14 and 3-14 bend 1-16, 2-16 and 3-16 must be close to the slider 1-18, 2-18 and 3-18 to achieve in concert with the spring bend the desired minimizing of 2nd torsion gain. 1st torsion mode amplitude is controlled by spring area, but the 2nd torsion mode amplitude is controlled by load beam placement relative to torsional axis.
Thus, assuming the particular spring profile, shown in
By figuratively connecting the center point of the bottom of dimple 1-22, 2-22 and 3-22 with the suspension pivot location 1-24, 2-24 and 3-24, corresponding to the edge of the mount plate 1-26, 2-26 and 3-26), the rotation centerline of suspension during flying is defined. In
TABLE 1
The gain distribution after forming.
T2 rotation
center z
Bias from T2
T1 gain (dB)
T2 gain (dB)
coordinate
rotation axis
Original
>10
>20
0.00314″
>0.003″
0.274″ from
4
11.2
0.00314″
0.0025″
boss center
bend 0.00264″
downward
0.317″ from
4.3
7.5
0.00314″
0.002″
boss center
bend 0.00264″
downward
0.38″ from
1.92
4.5
0.00314″
0.00126″
boss center
bend 0.00264″
downward
Note that by introducing a second bend at the slider just 0.274″ from the boss center decreased 2nd torsion gain from over 20 dB to 11.2. Making the bend closer to the slider 0.317″ from the boss center further decreased 2nd torsion to 7.5 dB, and a further shift of the bend to ward the slider to be 0.38° from the boss center further reduced the 2nd torsion to only 4.5 dB. 1st torsion was similarly improved.
In summary, torsion gain is minimized by following the following principles:
1. The 1st bend profile should follow the digitized location in
2. The 2nd bend location should be close to slider location, and bend amount should compensate dimple protrusion. By doing this, it is much easier to control the load beam profile, compared to bending in the middle of load beam. The purpose is to let the load beam profile follow the rotation centerline of suspension. The key is to let majority of load beam length to follow the suspension rotation centerline.
3. From FEA modeling, find the 2nd torsion node position, the bias between 2nd torsion node point and load beam profile should close to zero.
4. The load beam should be rigid enough, that is, during loading; the load beam profile shouldn't change too much. The load beam should have rigid rail or the load beam thickness should be equal or thicker than 0.004″.
The invention thus provides a suspension having a minimized 2nd torsion characteristic while the dimple height is retained, by adjusting the suspension load beam locally to overcome the deflection and bias that the dimple height introduces into the beam portion while retaining the major portion of the beam portion straight. Specifically, the invention reshapes the distal section of the beam portion immediately adjacent the slider to accommodate the dimple height without losing straightness in the major length of the beam portion, and to maintain nearly coincident the beam portion side profile and the centerline axis of rotation, thus to minimize the 2nd torsion characteristic.
The foregoing objects are thus met.
Coon, Warren, Summers, Robert, Mei, Shijin
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10643655, | Sep 30 2009 | Seagate Technology LLC | Baseplate resonant axis optimization |
7538979, | Mar 06 2006 | Seagate Technology LLC | Flexure including controlled static attitude and load point contact |
8228638, | May 24 2007 | Hutchinson Technology Incorporated | Load beam having a controlled droop angle |
8456776, | Sep 22 2010 | Western Digital Technologies, Inc. | Disk drive head gimbal assembly having a flexure bond pad shelf offset from a tongue |
8929032, | Sep 30 2009 | Seagate Technology LLC | Baseplate resonant axis optimization |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5657187, | May 26 1994 | Maxtor Corporation | Load beam having tuned resonance mode performance for supporting a read/write head |
5661619, | Dec 10 1993 | Hutchinson Technology Incorporated | Gimballing flexure with static torque offset compensation feature |
5666241, | Jul 10 1995 | Magnecomp Corp.; MAGNECOMP CORP | Double dimple disk drive suspension |
5852532, | Jul 10 1995 | Magnecomp Corp. | Double dimple disk drive suspension |
5923500, | Nov 12 1992 | Seagate Technology LLC | One-piece flexure for small magnetic heads |
20020034039, | |||
JP11007740, | |||
JP7211034, | |||
JP9306113, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jul 01 2002 | MEI, SHIJIN | Magnecomp Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012984 | /0749 | |
Jul 01 2002 | SUMMERS, ROBERT | Magnecomp Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012984 | /0749 | |
Jul 01 2002 | COON, WARREN | Magnecomp Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 012984 | /0749 | |
Jul 15 2002 | Magnecomp Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Nov 23 2021 | Magnecomp Corporation | Hutchinson Technology Incorporated | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 058207 | /0079 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jul 21 2008 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
May 25 2010 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Aug 02 2012 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Aug 03 2016 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Feb 15 2008 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Aug 15 2008 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 15 2009 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Feb 15 2011 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Feb 15 2012 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Aug 15 2012 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 15 2013 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Feb 15 2015 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Feb 15 2016 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Aug 15 2016 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 15 2017 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Feb 15 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |