A method and system can locate an RF transponder based on phase differences between signals transmitted to the RF transponder. The method transmits from a first transponder to a second transponder first and second signals at first and second frequencies, respectively. The second signal is compared with the first signal and a distance between the first and second transponders is determined based on the phase difference between the first and second signals. In one embodiment, the first transponder is an interrogator, the second transponder is an RF tag, and the RF tag determines the phase difference between the two signals. In another embodiment, the first and second transponders are the interrogator and RF tag, respectively, but the interrogator determines the phase difference between the two signals after the two signal are reflected back to the interrogator. The method can also determine a position (distance and direction) of the RF tag by measuring the distances from two different locations of the interrogator to the RF tag. In one embodiment, the two distances are measured from two spaced-apart antennas of the interrogator. In another embodiment, the interrogator is moved from one known location to another known location. With distance measurements from both known locations, the location of the RF tag can be determined by simple geometry.
|
9. A method of radio frequency communication, the method comprising:
transmitting a first signal at a first frequency from a first transponder to a second transponder;
transmitting a second signal at a second frequency from the first transponder to the second transponder;
comparing the second signal to the first signal, and phase locking on the first signal to create a reference signal and mixing the reference signal with the second signal to obtain a mixed signal; and
determining a distance between the first and second transponders based on a phase difference between the first and second signals, comprising determining how many nulls or peaks there are in the mixed signal.
1. A method of radio frequency communication, the method comprising:
transmitting a first signal at a first frequency from a first transponder to a second transponder;
phase locking on the first signal to create a reference signal;
transmitting a second signal at a second frequency from the first transponder to the second transponder;
comparing the second signal to the reference signal, comprising mixing the reference signal with the second signal to obtain a mixed signal; and
determining a distance between the first and second transponders based on a phase difference between the second and reference signals, comprising determining how many nulls or peaks there are in the mixed signal.
18. A radio frequency transponder, comprising:
an antenna that receives from an interrogator first and second signals having first and second frequencies, respectively;
a phase lock loop coupled to the antenna and structured to phase lock on the first signal to create a reference signal;
a comparator coupled to the antenna and phase lock loop and structured to compare the second signal to the reference signal, the comparator comprising a mixer structured to mix the reference signal with the second signal to obtain a mixed signal; and
means for determining a phase difference between the second and reference signals, the phase difference corresponding to a distance between the first and second transponders, the means for determining comprising a counter coupled to the mixer and structured to determine a null count of how many nulls there are in the mixed signal.
19. A radio frequency interrogator, comprising:
a variable frequency signal source that produces a first signal at a first frequency and a second signal at a second frequency;
antenna means coupled to the signal source for transmitting to a transponder the first and second signals and for receiving the first and second signals reflected back from the transponder;
a comparator coupled to the antenna and structured to compare the reflected second signal to the reflected first signal, the comparator comprising a mixer that mixes the second signal with the reflected first signal to produce a mixed signal; and
means for determining a distance between the first and second transponders based on a phase difference between the reflected first signal and the second signal, the means for determining comprising a null or peak counter that counts nulls or peaks in the mixed signal.
20. A radio frequency communication system, comprising:
an interrogator that transmits a radio frequency interrogation signal and receives a response signal; and
a transponder that receives the interrogation signal and transmits the response signal to the interrogator, the transponder including:
a memory that stores an information code;
a modulator coupled to the memory and structured to produce the response signal by modulating the interrogation signal according to the information code wherein a first one of the transponder and interrogator includes a variable frequency source that transmits to a second one of the transponder and interrogator a first signal at a first frequency followed by a second signal at a second frequency; one of the transponder and interrogator includes a phase comparison circuit that detects phase shifts in the second signal relative to the first signal; and one of the transponder and interrogator includes a distance determiner that determines the transponder and the interrogator based on the phase shifts; and
the phase comparison circuit comprising a phase lock loop that phase locks on the first signal to produce a reference signal; and
a mixer coupled to the phase lock loop and structured to mix the reference signal with the second signal to obtain a mixed signal and a counter coupled to the mixer and structured to determine one of a null and peak count of how many nulls or peaks there are in the mixed signal.
2. The method of
3. The method of
receiving a radio frequency interrogation signal from the interrogator;
modulating the interrogation signal according to an information code to produce a response signal; and
transmitting the response signal from the RF tag to the interrogator.
4. The method of
the step of transmitting the second signal includes transmitting a plurality of frequency portions each at a different frequency;
the comparing step includes comparing each of the frequency portions to the reference signal by mixing each of the frequency portions with the reference signal to produce a plurality of mixed signals; and
the distance determining step includes counting nulls or peaks in each of the mixed signals.
5. The method of
6. The method of
determining a second distance between the second antenna of the first transponder and the second transponder based on a phase difference between the signals transmitted through the second antenna; and
determining a direction from the first transponder to the second transponder based on the first and second distances and a distance between the first and second antennas.
7. The method of
transmitting a third signal at the first frequency from a second antenna of the first transponder to the second transponder;
phase locking on the third signal to create a second reference signal;
transmitting a fourth signal at the second frequency from the second antenna of the first transponder to the second transponder;
comparing the fourth signal to the second reference signal;
determining a distance between the second antenna of the first transponder and the second transponder based on a phase difference between the fourth signal and the second reference signal; and
determining a location of the second transponder based on the distances determined.
8. The method of
10. The method of
11. The method of
12. The method of
receiving a radio frequency interrogation signal from the interrogator;
modulating the interrogation signal according to an information code to produce a response signal; and
transmitting the response signal from the RF tag to the interrogator.
13. The method of
the step of transmitting the second signal includes transmitting a plurality of frequency portions each at a different frequency;
the comparing step includes comparing each of the frequency portions to the reference signal by mixing each of the frequency portions with the reference signal to produce a plurality of mixed signals; and
the distance determining step includes counting nulls or peaks in each of the mixed signals.
14. The method of
15. The method of
determining a second distance between the second antenna of the first transponder and the second transponder based on a phase difference between the signals transmitted through the second antenna; and
determining a direction from the first transponder to the second transponder based on the first and second distances and a distance between the first and second antennas.
16. The method of
17. The method of
moving the first transponder from a first position, from which the first distance is determined, to a second position;
transmitting a third signal at the first frequency from the first transponder to the second transponder;
transmitting a fourth signal at the second frequency from the first transponder to the second transponder;
comparing the fourth signal to the third signal;
determining a second distance between the first and second transponders based on a phase difference between the third and fourth signals; and
determining a location of the second transponder based on the first and second distances and the first and second positions of the first transponder.
21. The communication system of
23. The communication system of
24. The communication system of
|
The present invention relates to radio frequency identification tags (RF tags), and in particular, to an RF communication system and method for locating RF tags.
Remote communication utilizing wireless equipment typically relies on radio frequency (RF) technology, which is employed in many industries. One application of RF technology is in locating, identifying, and tracking objects, such as animals, inventory, and vehicles.
RF identification (RFID) tag systems have been developed that facilitate monitoring of remote objects. As shown in
The conventional RF tag 14 includes an amplitude modulator 24 with a switch 26, such as a MOS transistor, connected between the tag antenna 18 and ground. When the RF tag 14 is activated by the interrogation signal 20, a driver (not shown) creates a modulating signal 28 based on an information code, typically an identification code, stored in a non-volatile memory (not shown) of the RF tag 14. The modulating signal 28 is applied to a control terminal of the switch 26 which causes the switch 26 to alternately open and close. When the switch 26 is open, the tag antenna 18 reflects a portion of the interrogation signal 20 back to the interrogator 12 as a reflected portion 30 of the response signal 22. When the switch 26 is closed, the interrogation signal 20 travels through the switch 26 to ground, without being reflected, thereby creating a null portion 32 of the response signal 22. In other words, the interrogation signal 20 is amplitude-modulated to produce the response signal 22 by alternately reflecting and absorbing the interrogation signal 20 according to the modulating signal 28, which is characteristic of the stored information code. The RF tag 14 could also be modified so that the interrogation signal is reflected when the switch 26 is closed and absorbed when the switch 26 is open. Upon receiving the response signal 22, the interrogator 12 demodulates the response signal 22 to decode the information code represented by the response signal.
The substantial advantage of RFID systems is the non-contact, non-line-of-sight capability of the technology. The interrogator 12 emits the interrogation signal 20 with a range from one inch to one hundred feet or more, depending upon its power output and the radio frequency used. Tags can be read through a variety of substances such as smell, fog, ice, paint, dirt, and other visually and environmentally challenging conditions where bar codes or other optically-read technologies would be useless. RF tags can also be read at remarkable speeds, in most cases responding in less than one hundred milliseconds.
A typical RF tag system 10 will contain a number of RF tags 14 and the interrogator 12. There are three main categories of RF tags. These are beam-powered passive tags, battery-powered semi-passive tags, and active tags. Each operates in fundamentally different ways.
The beam-powered RF tag is often referred to as a passive device because it derives the energy needed for its operation from the interrogation signal beamed at it. The tag rectifies the field and changes the reflective characteristics of the tag itself, creating a change in reflectivity that is seen at the interrogator. A battery-powered semi-passive RFID tag operates in a similar fashion, modulating its RF cross section in order to reflect a delta to the interrogator to develop a communication link. Here, the battery is the source of the tag's operational power. Finally, in the active RF tag, a transmitter is used to create its own radio frequency energy powered by the battery.
The range of communication for such tags varies according to the transmission power of the interrogator 12 and the RF tag 14. Battery-powered tags operating at 2,450 MHz have traditionally been limited to less than ten meters in range. However, devices with sufficient power can reach up to 200 meters in range, depending on the frequency and environmental characteristics.
Although prior art communication systems can communicate with an RF tag that is within a certain distance of the interrogator (depending on the interrogator power), the interrogator cannot determine the location of the RF tag. For example, the prior art interrogator may be able to determine that there is an RF tag within 100 meters of the interrogator, but cannot determine whether it is 90 meters away or 45 meters away. In addition, the prior art interrogator cannot determine whether the RF tag is in front of, behind, or to either side of the interrogator. There are numerous applications for which such location information is important.
Embodiments of the present invention are directed to a method and system for locating an RF transponder. The method transmits from a first transponder to a second transponder first and second signals at different frequencies, respectively. The second signal is compared with the first signal and a distance between the first and second transponders is determined based on a phase difference between the first and second signals. In one embodiment, the first transponder is an interrogator, the second transponder is an RF tag, and the RF tag determines the phase difference between the two signals. In another embodiment, the first and second transponders are the interrogator and RF tag, respectively, but the interrogator determines the phase difference between the two signals after the two signal are reflected back to the interrogator. Alternatively, the roles of the interrogator and RF tag are reversed in other embodiments.
The comparison and determination of a phase difference between the two signals are performed in one embodiment by phase locking one the first signal to produce a reference signal. The reference signal is then mixed with the second signal to produce a mixed signal. A counter determines the phase difference by counting the number of nulls or peaks in the mixed signal, the nulls corresponding to respective portions of the signals that are of opposite phase to each other and the peaks corresponding to respective portions of the signals that are in phase with each other. The number of nulls or peaks within a period is directly related to the distance between the interrogator and the RF tag. In a preferred embodiment, the second signal is a frequency modulated signal that includes plural frequency portions each at different frequencies and the counter counts nulls or peaks in plural different mixed signals produced by mixing the respective frequency portions with the reference signal.
The method can also determine a position of the RF tag by measuring the distances from two different locations of the interrogator to the RF tag. In one embodiment, the two distances are measured from two spaced-apart antennas of the interrogator. In another embodiment, the interrogator is moved from one known location to another known location. With distance measurements from both known locations, the location of the RF tag can be determined by simple geometry.
As shown in
The interrogator 36 includes a controller 44, a variable signal source 46, a tapped transmission line 48, a signal analyzer 50, and an antenna 52. The controller 44 can be any general purpose processor, such as a known microprocessor, or can be specifically designed to control the operation of the interrogator 36 as described herein. Examples of the tapped transmission line 48 and signal analyzer 50 can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,360,810 to Landt, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The tapped transmission line 48 enables the single antenna 52 to be used to transmit and receive signals simultaneously. Of course other systems for receiving and decoding the response signal from the RF tag 38 could be employed, such as the system shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,075,632, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The RF tag 38 includes a controller 54, a memory 56, a modulating switch 58, an antenna 60, a phase comparison circuit 62, and a mode switch 64. The controller 54 can be any general purpose processor, such as a known microprocessor, programmed to control the operation of the RF tag 38 as described herein or can be specifically designed to provide the control functions. The mode switch 64 alternately couples the antenna 60 to either the modulating switch 58 or the phase comparison circuit 62 under the control of the controller 54 as discussed in more detail below.
Stored in the memory 56 is an information code, such as an identification code that identifies the RF tag 38 and/or an object to which the RF tag is attached. Alternatively, the information code could represent numerous other pieces of information, such as the environmental conditions surrounding the RF tag 38, inventory information associated with the RF tag, or information that was previously written to the RF tag before or after the RF tag was placed into service. The memory 56 can be implemented with any type of memory, but preferably is non-volatile memory so that the information code is not lost when power is lost.
During a tag identification mode, the interrogator 36 transmits a continuous wave interrogation signal to the RF tag 38 in an attempt to determine the identity of the RF tag. Based on the identification code stored in the memory 56, the controller 54 of the RF tag 38 creates a modulating signal that is applied to the modulating switch 58, which modulates the interrogation signal to produce a backscatter response signal that is transmitted back to the interrogator 36. The modulation of the interrogation signal can be amplitude-modulation as described above with respect to
The response signal from the RF tag 38 is received by the interrogator 36 and mixed with the interrogation signal in the tapped transmission line 48. The tapped transmission line 48 and signal analyzer 50 combine to demodulate the response signal to determine the information code of the RF tag 38 and pass the information code to the controller 44. The controller 44 determines whether the information code is valid, and if so, transmits an acknowledgement signal to the RF tag 38.
After the interrogator 36 acknowledges receipt of the information code, the RF tag 38 switches into a distance determination mode by coupling the phase comparison circuit 62 to the antenna 60 via the mode switch 64. In the distance determination mode, the interrogator 36 transmits the first and second signals 40, 42 to the RF tag 38. In a preferred embodiment, the second signal 42 is transmitted after the first signal 40 is transmitted, but the signals could be transmitted simultaneously by separate antennas without departing from the invention. The controller 44 of the interrogator 36 can be programmed to cause the variable signal source 46 transmit only the first signal 40 at the first frequency followed by the second signal 42 at the second frequency. Alternatively, the controller 44 can be programmed to cause the signal source 46 to transmit a frequency ramp that starts at the first frequency and includes the second frequency, that is, the first and second signals 40, 42 can be part of the frequency ramp. Or, the signal source 46 can randomly or pseudo-randomly changes frequencies to transmit the first and second signals 40, 42. The invention includes any combination of two or more frequencies.
The phase comparison circuit 62 of the RF tag 38 compares the signals 40, 42 and determines a phase difference between the two signals. The distance between the interrogator 36 and the RF tag 38 is directed related to that detected phase difference. The phase comparison circuit 62 passes to the controller 54 information indicative of the phase difference, which the controller can use to compute the distance between the interrogator 36 and the RF tag 3S.
Shown in
When the signal received by the phase comparison circuit 62 changes from the first signal 40 to the second signal 42, the mixer 40 receives at one input the second signal 42 from the signal divider 66 and at the other input the reference signal which is substantially identical to the first signal 40. The mixer 70 combines the second signal 42 with the reference signal, resulting in a mixed output signal with two frequency components. At regular points in time and space, the second signal 42 will be at a maximum while the reference signal is at a minimum, resulting in null points in the mixed output signal. Consecutive null points of the mixed output signal will be separated by peak points at which both the second and reference signals are at a maximum, or both are at a minimum. The null/peak counter 72 counts either the null points or the peak points in the mixed output signal and provides the resulting count to the controller 54. The null/peak counter 70 can be either an analog counter or can include an analog/digital converter and a digital signal processor to determine the count digitally.
In one embodiment, the frequencies of the first and second signals 40, 42 are known to the controller 54, and thus, the controller uses the count provided by the null/peak counter 72 to compute the distance between the interrogator 36 and the RF tag 38. Alternatively, the controller can incorporate the count into a count signal that is transmitted by the RF tag 38 back to the interrogator 36. The controller 44 would then use the count and the frequencies of the first and second signals 40, 42 to determine the distance between the interrogator 36 and the RF tag 38.
An important aspect is the fact that both backscatter and transmitter systems can determine the distance between an interrogator and an RF tag and the location of the RF tag using such phase differences and null/peak counts.
An example may help one to understand how the distance between the interrogator 36 and RF tag 38 can be determined. A first signal at 880 MHz has a wavelength of 34.0909091 cm and a second signal at 884 MHz has a wavelength of 33.9366516 cm. At a distance of about 37.5 meters (110 wavelengths of the first signal and 110.5 wavelengths of the second signal), the first and second signals will be 180 degrees out of phase, resulting in a null point in the mixed signal output by the mixer 70. At each additional 75 m, there will be an additional null point, and thus, the distance between the interrogator 36 and the RF tag 38 can be determined with an accuracy of ±37 m using a first signal at 880 MHz and a second signal at 884 MHz.
The accuracy can be improved by using a frequency modulated second signal rather than keeping the second signal at only the second frequency. For example, assume the second signal includes a first portion at 883 MHz, a second portion at 884 MHz, and a third portion at 890 MHz. Mixing each of those portions of the second signal with the first signal results in first, second, and the mixed signals with nulls at distances of 50, 37.5, and 15 meters, respectively. Therefore, if the counter counts 1 null for each of the first and second mixed signals and 3 nulls for the third nixed signal, then the controller can determine that the distance between the interrogator 36 and RF tag 38 is between 50 and 60 meters. If the distance were less than 50 meters, then the first mixed signal would have had no nulls; and if the distance were more than 60 meters, then the third mixed signal would have had 4 nulls. Of course, with more than three frequency portions of the second signal, the accuracy of the distance determination can be improved further. Moreover, rather than comparing all frequency portions of the second signal to the first signal, one could compare some of the frequency portions with each other.
In one embodiment, the interrogator 36 employs a quarter-wave dipole antenna as the antenna 52, but any type of antenna could be employed. In another embodiment, the antenna 52 is a phased-array antenna, which enables the interrogator 36 to determine the direction of the RF tag 38 relative to the interrogator. By determining both the direction and distance of the RF tag 38 relative to the interrogator 36, the interrogator accurately determines the location of the RF tag 38.
Shown in
Shown in
By incorporating the null/peak counter 72 in the interrogator 36B rather than in the RF tag 38, the interrogator 36B can determine the location of any RF tag. In the distance determination mode, the controller 44 causes the variable signal source 46 to transmit the first and second signals 40, 42 via the antenna 52. The RF tag reflects and modulates the first and second signals 40, 42. The modulation is done to distinguish the RF tag from other objects such as metal cans or other reflecting objects. The reflected first signal 40 is received by the antenna 52 and mixed with the second signal 42 by the tapped transmission line 48. The null/peak counter 72 counts the nulls or peaks in the mixed signal output by the tapped transmission line 48 and the controller 44 determines a first distance between the interrogator 36B and the RF tag based on the null or peak count. It should be appreciated that the distance determination algorithm used by the controller must compensate for the fact that the total path length of the communication is now out and back.
The user then moves the interrogator 36B to a second location and the process is repeated to determine a second distance between the interrogator 36B and the RF tag. The controller 44 determines the location of the RF tag based on the first and second distances and on the interrogator location information provided by the position input device 76. To facilitate its movement, the interrogator 36B, like the interrogators 36, 36A, can be provided as a hand-held device.
Although the embodiments shown in
In view of the foregoing, it will be appreciated that the RF communication system discussed herein provides important advantages over prior art systems. By providing the ability to locate an RF tag, and any object attached to the RF tag, the RF communication system discussed above greatly extends the range of applications to which RF tag technology can be applied. For example, the RF communication system discussed above can be employed to locate lost weapons on a battlefield, animals across a large property, and any inventory object within a warehouse.
Finally it will be clear that many modifications and variants may be introduced to the inventive embodiments described and illustrated herein, all of which come within the scope of the invention as defined in the accompanying claims.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10037445, | Nov 07 2005 | Systems and methods for managing coverage area of wireless communication devices | |
10073162, | Dec 17 2015 | Humatics Corporation | Radio-frequency localization techniques and associated systems, devices, and methods |
10073530, | Mar 31 2008 | GOLBA LLC | Wireless positioning approach using time-delay of signals with a known transmission pattern |
10074889, | Dec 17 2015 | Humatics Corporation | Chip-scale radio-frequency localization devices and associated systems and methods |
10094909, | Dec 17 2015 | Humatics Corporation | Radio-frequency localization techniques and associated systems, devices, and methods |
10205218, | Dec 17 2015 | Humatics Corporation | Radio-frequency localization techniques and associated systems, devices, and methods |
10295661, | Oct 16 2015 | RFLOCUS INC | Storage medium location detection system and program |
10422870, | Jun 15 2015 | Humatics Corporation | High precision time of flight measurement system for industrial automation |
10505256, | Dec 17 2015 | Humatics Corporation | Radio-frequency localization techniques and associated systems, devices, and methods |
10591592, | Jun 15 2015 | Humatics Corporation | High-precision time of flight measurement systems |
10665923, | Dec 17 2015 | Humatics Corporation | Chip-scale radio-frequency localization devices and associated systems and methods |
10735168, | Nov 20 2015 | pro-micron GmbH | Method and interrogation device for interrogating data from a passive element |
10860818, | Jun 20 2018 | Toshiba Tec Kabushiki Kaisha | Communication apparatus, communication method, and computer program |
10962632, | Dec 18 2017 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Electronic device and method for low power RF ranging |
10992024, | Dec 17 2015 | Humatics Corporation | Radio-frequency localization techniques and associated systems, devices, and methods |
11009596, | Oct 16 2015 | RFLOCUS INC. | Storage medium location detection system and program |
11009600, | Dec 18 2006 | INNOVO SURGICAL, INC | RFID location systems and methods |
11050133, | Dec 17 2015 | Humatics Corporation | Polarization techniques for suppression of harmonic coupling and associated systems, devices, and methods |
11050134, | Dec 17 2015 | Humatics Corporation | Radio-frequency localization techniques and associated systems, devices, and methods |
11177554, | Dec 17 2015 | Humatics Corporation | Chip-scale radio-frequency localization devices and associated systems and methods |
11237263, | Jun 15 2015 | Humatics Corporation | High-precision time of flight measurement systems |
11688929, | Dec 17 2015 | Humatics Corporation | Radio-frequency localization techniques and associated systems, devices, and methods |
11899092, | Feb 13 2019 | Lambda:4 Entwicklungen GmbH | Travel time measurement based on frequency switching |
7024331, | Nov 15 2000 | Turftrax Group Limited | Tag tracking |
7030761, | Mar 16 2004 | Symbol Technologies, LLC | Multi-resolution object location system and method |
7081815, | Aug 23 2001 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Radio frequency security system, method for a building facility or the like, and apparatus and methods for remotely monitoring the status of fire extinguishers |
7193504, | Oct 09 2001 | Ruizhang Technology Limited Company | Methods and apparatuses for identification |
7205931, | Dec 20 2002 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for determining the distance between a base station and a mobile object, in addition to a base station and identification system for a method of this type |
7212563, | May 04 2001 | Zebra Technologies Corporation | Real-time locating system and method using timing signal |
7228228, | Nov 15 2000 | Turftrax Group Limited | Tag tracking |
7295118, | Aug 19 2005 | SUPERVISION, LLC | Low cost RFID system |
7308249, | Nov 13 2002 | STMicroelectronics S.A. | Communication between electromagnetic transponders |
7317382, | Dec 13 2004 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Remote communications devices, wireless communications systems, and wireless communications methods |
7348875, | May 04 2004 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Semi-passive radio frequency identification (RFID) tag with active beacon |
7403120, | Sep 29 2004 | Symbol Technologies, Inc | Reverse infrastructure location system and method |
7436302, | Aug 19 2005 | SUPERVISION, LLC | Low cost RFID labeling device |
7482921, | Jul 19 2004 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and device for localizing transponders |
7504992, | Aug 01 2007 | Southwest Research Institute | Wireless system using continuous wave phase measurement for high-precision distance measurement |
7562083, | Nov 07 2003 | Ruizhang Technology Limited Company | RFID Huffman encoded commands |
7623834, | Oct 03 2000 | Mineral Lassen LLC | Multi-band wireless communication device and method |
7623835, | Oct 03 2000 | Mineral Lassen LLC | Multi-band wireless communication device and method |
7716160, | Nov 07 2003 | Ruizhang Technology Limited Company | Methods and apparatuses to identify devices |
7716208, | Nov 07 2003 | Ruizhang Technology Limited Company | RFID handshaking |
7791480, | Oct 22 2003 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Process control monitoring systems, industrial plants, and process control monitoring methods |
7884753, | Feb 04 2008 | Honeywell International Inc. | Apparatus and method for ranging of a wireless transceiver with a switching antenna |
7899425, | Oct 03 2000 | Mineral Lassen LLC | Multi-band wireless communication device and method |
8102244, | Aug 09 2003 | Ruizhang Technology Limited Company | Methods and apparatuses to identify devices |
8102303, | Jun 13 2008 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for distance measurement and data transmission in a continuous wave radar system |
8107446, | Nov 07 2005 | Radiofy LLC | Wireless RFID networking systems and methods |
8149093, | Jun 06 2008 | Lyngsoe Systems | System and method for wireless communications |
8149155, | Dec 18 2007 | Omron Corporation | Range measuring method, range measuring apparatus, non-contacted IC medium and range measuring system |
8181865, | Apr 24 2007 | PATRICIA A ANDERSON REVOCABLE TRUST | Radio frequency identification point of sale unassisted retail transaction and digital media kiosk |
8188908, | Jan 29 2010 | Transcore, LP; Amtech Systems, LLC | System and method for measurement of distance to a tag by a modulated backscatter RFID reader |
8191780, | Apr 07 2005 | PATRICIA A ANDERSON REVOCABLE TRUST | Self checkout kiosk and retail security system |
8218703, | Oct 02 2002 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Methods of processing a wireless communication signal, wireless communication synchronization methods, and a radio frequency identification device communication method |
8279047, | Oct 09 2001 | Ruizhang Technology Limited Company | Methods and apparatus for anti-collision for radio frequency communication |
8279112, | Nov 03 2008 | Novanta Corporation | Methods and apparatuses for RFID tag range determination |
8284034, | May 31 2001 | Ruizhang Technology Limited Company | Methods and apparatuses to identify devices |
8289159, | Apr 26 2006 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Wireless localization apparatus and method |
8294554, | Dec 18 2006 | INNOVO SURGICAL, INC | RFID location systems and methods |
8311508, | Sep 11 2007 | Verizon Patent and Licensing Inc | Wireless enabled device tracking system and method |
8314736, | Mar 31 2008 | Golba, LLC | Determining the position of a mobile device using the characteristics of received signals and a reference database |
8328096, | Apr 07 2005 | PATRICIA A ANDERSON REVOCABLE TRUST | Self checkout kiosk and retail security system |
8344949, | Mar 31 2008 | Golba, LLC | Wireless positioning approach using time-delay of signals with a known transmission pattern |
8345653, | Nov 07 2005 | Radiofy LLC | Wireless RFID networking systems and methods |
8360216, | Jul 04 2008 | ENRX IPT GMBH | System and method for transferring electric energy to a vehicle |
8406794, | Apr 26 2006 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatuses of initiating communication in wireless networks |
8421676, | Mar 31 2008 | GOLBA LLC | Method and system for determining the location of an electronic device using multi-tone frequency signals |
8446254, | Nov 03 2008 | Novanta Corporation | Methods and apparatuses for RFID tag range determination |
8469269, | Jun 13 2008 | PATRICIA A ANDERSON REVOCABLE TRUST | Self checkout kiosk and retail security system |
8544622, | Sep 19 2008 | ENRX IPT GMBH | Producing electromagnetic fields for transferring electric energy to a vehicle |
8590682, | Jul 04 2008 | ENRX IPT GMBH | Transferring electric energy to a vehicle |
8600373, | Apr 26 2006 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Dynamic distribution of device functionality and resource management |
8644396, | Apr 18 2006 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Waveform encoding for wireless applications |
8644850, | Oct 05 2009 | BAE SYSTEMS PLC | Radio navigation |
8654868, | Apr 17 2007 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Offloaded processing for wireless applications |
8693455, | Nov 07 2005 | Radiofy LLC | Wireless RFID networking systems and methods |
8723720, | May 03 2011 | Harris Corporation | Wireless location detection and/or tracking device and associated methods |
8742899, | Aug 09 2003 | Ruizhang Technology Limited Company | Methods and apparatuses to identify devices |
8742975, | Apr 27 2010 | Amtech Systems, LLC | System and method for microwave ranging to a target in presence of clutter and multi-path effects |
8754752, | Dec 18 2006 | INNOVO SURGICAL, INC | RFID location systems and methods |
8754812, | Mar 31 2008 | GOLBA LLC | Method and system for determining the location of an electronic device using multi-tone frequency signals |
8768952, | Nov 07 2003 | Ruizhang Technology Limited Company | Methods and apparatuses to identify devices |
8818885, | Apr 07 2005 | PATRICIA A ANDERSON REVOCABLE TRUST | Self checkout kiosk and retail security system |
8823577, | Dec 23 2009 | HAILO TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | Distance separation tracking system |
8827058, | Sep 19 2008 | ENRX IPT GMBH | Inductively receiving electric energy for a vehicle |
8963775, | Oct 05 2009 | BAE SYSTEMS PLC | Tracking radio signal sources |
8994583, | Jul 16 2010 | SIVERS WIRELESS AB | Method and device for continuous wave radar measurements |
9087226, | Jun 09 2006 | ZEST LABS, INC | System, method and computer program product for calibrating interrogator signal strength and/or tag response range setting |
9113343, | Mar 31 2008 | GOLBA LLC | Wireless positioning approach using time-delay of signals with a known transmission pattern |
9173187, | Mar 31 2008 | GOLBA LLC | Determining the position of a mobile device using the characteristics of received signals and a reference database |
9261579, | Oct 05 2009 | BAE SYSTEMS PLC | Radio positioning of a mobile receiver using a virtual positioning reference |
9366745, | Mar 31 2008 | GOLBA LLC | Methods and systems for determining the location of an electronic device using multi-tone frequency signals |
9366756, | Dec 06 2008 | GROUND TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CANADA INC | RF tag reader for accurate position determination |
9459343, | Mar 22 2012 | Intermec IP Corp. | Synthetic aperture RFID handheld with tag location capability |
9483671, | Nov 07 2003 | Ruizhang Technology Limited Company | Methods and apparatuses to identify devices |
9581689, | Jun 28 2007 | THE NIPPON SIGNAL CO , LTD | Reader/writer and article sorting system |
9768837, | Dec 17 2015 | Humatics Corporation | Radio-frequency localization techniques and associated systems, devices, and methods |
9797988, | Dec 17 2015 | Humatics Corporation | Radio-frequency localization techniques and associated systems, devices, and methods |
9818005, | Jun 13 2014 | GOOGLE LLC | Zero-power wireless device programming |
9829560, | Mar 31 2008 | GOLBA LLC | Determining the position of a mobile device using the characteristics of received signals and a reference database |
9835722, | Mar 22 2012 | Intermec IP Corp. | Synthetic aperture RFID handheld with tag location capability |
9848252, | Jun 06 2008 | Lyngsoe Systems | System and method for wireless communications |
9864971, | Apr 07 2005 | PATRICIA A ANDERSON REVOCABLE TRUST | Secure self-checkout station |
9903939, | Dec 17 2015 | Humatics Corporation | Radio-frequency localization techniques and associated systems, devices, and methods |
9915725, | Dec 17 2015 | Humatics Corporation | Radio-frequency localization techniques and associated systems, devices, and methods |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3098971, | |||
3299424, | |||
4075632, | Aug 27 1974 | The United States of America as represented by the United States | Interrogation, and detection system |
4087816, | Dec 19 1975 | National Research Council of Canada | VLF radio position location system |
4283726, | Sep 05 1978 | OHL, JOHN P | Dual frequency distance measuring system |
4360810, | Jan 19 1981 | The United States of America as represented by the United States | Multichannel homodyne receiver |
4851851, | Dec 12 1985 | Stiftelsen Institutet For Mikrovagsteknik Vid Tekniska Hogskolan i | Method for measuring the distance and/or the relative velocity between two objects |
5298904, | Aug 04 1992 | Distance measuring system | |
5528232, | Jun 15 1990 | OL SECURITY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY | Method and apparatus for locating items |
5790022, | Sep 09 1996 | Security tracking system | |
6084512, | Oct 02 1998 | WSOU Investments, LLC | Method and apparatus for electronic labeling and localizing |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jun 06 2000 | Battelle Memorial Institute K1-53 | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jun 06 2000 | CARRENDER, CURTIS LEE | Battelle Memorial Institute K1-53 | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 010894 | /0655 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jul 01 2008 | STOL: Pat Hldr no Longer Claims Small Ent Stat |
Aug 19 2008 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Aug 28 2012 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Aug 26 2016 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Mar 15 2008 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Sep 15 2008 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 15 2009 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Mar 15 2011 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Mar 15 2012 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Sep 15 2012 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 15 2013 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Mar 15 2015 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Mar 15 2016 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Sep 15 2016 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 15 2017 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Mar 15 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |