An optoelectronic display device comprises an organic light emitting diode microdisplay 1 and a viewing convex lens 2 arranged at a distance from the microdisplay which may be less than, equal to or greater than the focal length of the lens.
|
13. An optoelectronic display device, comprising an organic light emitting diode microdisplay and a viewing convex lens arranged at a distance therefrom, said distance is greater than the focal length of the lens to give an inverted real image.
1. A direct view optoelectronic display device, comprising an organic light emitting diode microdisplay and a viewing convex, lightweight, plastic, microfresnel lens arranged at a distance therefrom, a physical size of the display is magnified by a factor of no greater than approximately 5 and said distance is less than or equal to the focal length of the lens.
6. A direct view optoelectronic display device, comprising an organic light emitting diode microdisplay and a viewing convex, lightweight, plastic, microfresnel lens arranged at a distance therefrom, a physical size of the display is magnified by a factor of no greater than approximately 5 and said distance is greater than the focal length of the lens to give an inverted real image.
11. A display device, comprising a direct view optoelectronic display device having an organic light emitting diode microdisplay and a viewing convex, lightweight, plastic, microfresnel lens arranged at a distance therefrom, said lens magnifies an image of said microdisplay by a factor between 2 to 5 times and serves as a viewing surface for viewing the magnified image from a viewing distance from a viewer's eye of 25 to 50 cm.
2. A device according to
3. A device according to
4. A device according to
5. A device according to
7. A device according to
8. A device according to
9. A device according to
10. A device according to
12. A device according to
|
This invention relates to an optoelectronic display device.
Small sized high resolution displays have been manufactured using a number of flat panel display technologies, and also for cathode ray tube (CRT) technology. These have been developed for use in a number of different products, which require different performance profiles from the display. Important considerations often include the cost of the display, the power consumption, the resolution, contrast, brightness and size of display.
The difficulty in obtaining acceptable levels of all these, for small, and very large, sized displays has seen the development recently of a new class of optoelectronic display devices. These devices couple a high resolution display with an optical system to create an image for viewing that is larger than the physical size of the display. This type of display is often referred to as a microdisplay, or miniature display.
Typically the microdisplay has a diagonal of less (often much less) than 6 cm. The displays typically have an active matrix driving system to control the pixel arrays, and to lower power consumption. The resolution of the displays varies from 160×160 pixels up to almost 2000×2000, with the displays often constructed directly on top of amorphous silicon thin film transistors (TFTs), polysilicon TFTs on glass, or crystalline silicon CMOS wafers.
Many different types of liquid crystal display have been manufactured in this way, and several types of digital micromirror devices, inorganic electroluminescent, and organic light emitting diode devices, have been or are being developed. This gives rise to a range of displays that are either transmissive, reflective, or emissive in nature. The display cost, power consumption, resolution, contrast, brightness and size affect what type of market and product they are used for.
The display devices are known to be used in three different configurations.
The first method is projection. The display device is combined with optical components and used to project an image onto a screen some distance away. The image created on the display is observed by the viewer(s) on the screen, and is typically a very large image. This mode of use is favourable for displays that work in a reflective or transmissive mode. This is because they are used in conjunction with suitably bright light sources needed to project an image over some distance.
The second method is referred to as a virtual display or as near to eye mode. This sees the display device combined with optics, suitable light sources if required (depending on the mode of operation), and held close to the viewers eye, normally somewhere nearer than 15 centimeters. The viewer sees what is typically termed a virtual image, which appears much larger than the physical size of the display. The image may appear to be 10-20 times the physical size of the display. This configuration is typically used for digital camera viewfinder applications, headset applications, and has been postulated for use in mobile communication products, personal internet browser devices, and toys amongst others. This mode of operation is suitable for displays working in emissive, transmissive, or reflective mode.
The advantage of virtual mode is that a high resolution colour image can be viewed from products that are physically small, and the display is much lower power and lower cost than a display of the size of the virtual image would be.
In the third configuration, the display is viewed directly without the aid of optical lenses to increase the perceived image size. This is known as direct view. For application of high resolution displays in products such as mobile telephones, this method has the advantage of allowing the images to be viewed comfortably from approximately arms length, somewhere between 25 and 50 cm from the viewer's eyes. This is also the manner of viewing displays with which most people are familiar.
However, the disadvantage is that the viewed image never appears larger than the physical size of the display. In direct view mode, there is a limitation to the resolution that the human eye can perceive which is related to the size of a display and the distance it is viewed from. Therefore for comfortable viewing from 25 to 50 cm distance a display must have a display diagonal size of approximately 4 cm or larger. For a display with a diagonal of 4 cm, higher resolution than 320×240 pixels will not be perceived by the human eye.
Direct view displays of this size and resolution have mostly been too expensive and used too much power to facilitate their integration into a range of consumer products.
As the displays are typically built on substrates that are silicon wafers, or house silicon TFTs, increasing the physical size of the display greatly increases the cost and overall power consumption.
The present invention provides an optoelectronic display device comprising an organic light emitting diode microdisplay and a convex viewing lens arranged at a distance therefrom.
The device of the invention is intended to replace standard direct view displays and differs from them in that it does not have a truly flat construction. The suitably sized lens serves as the viewing surface. The lens could be positioned at a distance from the microdisplay less than or equal to the focal length of the lens. With the lens positioned at the focal length distance in front of the microdisplay a maximum magnification is obtained. If the lens is positioned nearer to the microdisplay, less magnification will occur for the virtual image. The lens can be further than the focal length distance from the microdisplay for an inverted real image to be seen on the surface of the lens. By placing the microdisplay upside down, an upright image will be seen by the viewer.
Preferably, the physical size of the display is magnified by a factor of approximately 2 or greater, and advantageously the magnification is up to approximately 5 times. This enlarged image is viewed from the surface of the lens, with the device conveniently held somewhere between 25 and 50 cm from the viewer's eyes.
The main advantage of this type of display device is that by keeping the size of the silicon substrate small and magnifying the image by a factor between 2 and 5 times, the associated cost is much lower than creating a display 2 to 5 times as large. The power consumption is also less than that of a direct view display of a similar size to the magnified image. In OLED displays the light output can be increased by a factor between 2 and 5 times without a linearly corresponding increase in power consumption.
A further advantage of the invention is that it creates an affordable active matrix colour display of a size that is suitable for incorporation into mobile telephones and similar products.
Preferably, the lens is a lightweight plastic microfresnel lens, in order to remove chromatic aberrations and to make possible the construction of a relatively lightweight display device.
The viewing lens does not necessarily need to be placed directly above the microdisplay. To reduce the overall depth of the display device, that is the distance from the microdisplay to the viewing lens it is also possible to fold the optical path, using appropriate additional optics. This may be useful when using the display device in an application or product which has set dimensions. By folding the optical path, one can reduce the overall space occupied by the display device.
In order that the invention may be more readily understood, reference will now be made, by way of example only, to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Wright, Jeffrey Peter, Steven, David Paul
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5155615, | Apr 15 1988 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Miniature display device for use in a miniature electronic apparatus |
5325278, | Apr 19 1991 | CURTIS MANUFACTURING CO , INC | Compact combined light and magnifier apparatus for a hand held computer with video screen |
5633762, | Oct 23 1995 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Dual image manifestation apparatus with integrated electro-optical package |
5699073, | Mar 04 1996 | RYO HOLDINGS, LLC | Integrated electro-optical package with carrier ring and method of fabrication |
6067459, | Oct 30 1997 | Display magnifier | |
6151172, | Nov 08 1999 | Power lens | |
6222686, | Oct 22 1999 | HANGER SOLUTIONS, LLC | Gradient index magnifying lens |
6275333, | Jan 25 2000 | Display window magnification device | |
6389268, | Jul 29 1999 | Ericsson Inc. | Electronic device holders with display panel magnifier |
6452577, | Nov 06 1998 | Kopin Corporation; Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Microdisplay viewer |
EP147027, | |||
EP539699, | |||
EP838715, | |||
GB2095454, | |||
GB2298759, | |||
H423, | |||
WO9714072, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
May 10 2001 | Microemissive Displays Limited | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Nov 08 2002 | WRIGHT, JEFFREY PETER | Microemissive Displays Limited | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 013881 | /0392 | |
Nov 08 2002 | STEVEN, DAVID PAUL | Microemissive Displays Limited | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 013881 | /0392 | |
Apr 05 2007 | MICROEMISSIVE DISPLAYS GROUP PLC | NOBLE VENTURE FINANCE I LIMITED | FIXED CHARGE AGREEMENT | 019511 | /0889 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Nov 10 2008 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Mar 24 2009 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Mar 24 2009 | M1554: Surcharge for Late Payment, Large Entity. |
Dec 17 2012 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
May 03 2013 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
May 03 2008 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Nov 03 2008 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 03 2009 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
May 03 2011 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
May 03 2012 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Nov 03 2012 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 03 2013 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
May 03 2015 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
May 03 2016 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Nov 03 2016 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 03 2017 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
May 03 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |