The invention relates to a system for determining the gear selection utilizing a selection lever in an automatic transmission having at least two units (10, 12) for detecting the selection lever position (14, 16, 18, 20, 22). Each unit (10, 12) generates a signal corresponding to the detected selection lever position (14, 16, 18, 20, 22). The system also has a device for evaluating the signals. Based on the signals, the gear selection can be determined while considering plausibility rules. The invention relates further to a method for determining the gear selection utilizing a selection lever in an automatic transmission.
|
7. A method for determining the gear selection by means of a selection lover in an automatic transmission, the method comprises the steps of:
detecting the selection lever position via at least two different paths and generating corresponding signals;
evaluating said signals to determine the gear selection based on the signals while considering plausibility rules;
wherein, for a first signal and a second signal, which correspond to different selection lever positions, a determination is made as to whether precisely one of the signals corresponds to an intermediate position of the selection lever;
that, if precisely one of the signals corresponds to an intermediate position of the selection lever, the other signal is subjected to a plausibility to determine the gear selection;
that, if none of the signals corresponds to an intermediate position of the selection lever, said first signal and second signal are subjected to a plausibility; and,
wherein said plausibility uses said plausibility rules to determine the gear selection, which are based on the evaluation of one or several secondary signals.
1. A system for determining a gear selection utilizing a selection lever in an automatic transmission, the system comprising:
at least two units for detecting the selection lever position generating respective signals corresponding to the detected selection lever position;
means for evaluating said signals to determine the gear selection based on said signals while considering plausibility rules;
wherein, with a first one of said signals and a second one of said signals, which correspond to different selection lever positions, a determination is made as to whether precisely one of said first and second signals corresponds to an intermediate position of the selection lever;
that, if precisely one of the signals corresponds to an intermediate position of the selection lever, the other signal is subjected to a plausibility to determine the gear selection;
that, if none of the signals corresponds to an intermediate position of the selection lever, said first one and said second one of said signals are subjected to a plausibility; and,
wherein said plausibility uses said plausibility rules to determine the gear selection, which are based on the evaluation of one or several secondary signals.
2. The system of
3. The system of
4. The system of
5. The system of
6. The system of
8. The method of
9. The method of
10. The method of
11. The method of
12. The method of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This application is the national stage of International Application No. PCT/DE 02/01973, filed May 29, 2002, designating the United States which claims priority from German patent application no. 101 30 230.4, filed Jun. 22, 2001, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to a system for determining the gear selection utilizing a selection lever in an automatic transmission having at least two units for detecting the selection lever position wherein each unit generates a signal corresponding to the detected selection lever position and the system having means for evaluating the signals. The invention further relates to a method for determining the gear selection utilizing a selection lever in an automatic transmission wherein the selection lever position is detected via at least two different paths and corresponding signals are generated and the signals are evaluated.
In automatic transmissions, for example, step automatic, CVT, ASG, the gear selection takes place utilizing a selection lever. A mechanical connection is usually present between the selection lever and the transmission. This means that the valves or switches, which are to be activated for the selection of another gear, are driven directly by the selection lever. The corresponding selection lever position is detected by means of displacement sensors and is transmitted to the transmission control apparatus.
Because of safety considerations, it has been already suggested to detect the position of the selection lever via two different paths, that is redundant information is made available for the selection lever position. In the case that different selection lever positions are detected, a switching into an emergency operation taken place immediately which either still makes possible to bring the vehicle into a service center in an emergency operation or to bring the vehicle to a suitable location or even leads to a disablement of the vehicle.
Without limiting the generality, the invention is described with respect to a continuously variable transmission (CVT) and is applicable in the same or similar manner to other automatic transmissions. Continuously variable transmissions include essentially two conical wheel pairs and a belt part designed, for example, as a thrust member belt. One of the conical wheel pairs is connected to a drive, for example, an internal combustion engine; whereas, the other conical wheel pair is connected to an output. In adjusting the transmission ratio of the continuously variable transmission and the tension of the belt part, the drive conical wheel pair and the output conical wheel pair, in general, comprise each an axially fixed and an axially movable conical wheel. The drive conical wheel pair is characterized as a drive disc or primary disc and the output conical wheel pair is also characterized as an output disc or secondary disc. The contact force of the axially movable conical wheels against the belt part takes place, in general, by the build up of a hydraulic pressure, for example, via a pump. By a suitable selection of the spacings or the contact force pressures of the conical wheels, the desired transmission ratio of the continuously variable transmission and the required tension of the belt part can be adjusted. The pump for the hydraulic drive of the conical wheels can, for example, be driven by the internal combustion engine. For the force transmission from the internal combustion engine to the drive conical pair, for example, a torque converter and a planetary set with clutches for forward and rearward travel can be provided.
The invention builds upon the class of system herein in that the gear selection can be determined based on the signals while considering the plausibility rules. On the basis of the present invention, it is therefore no longer necessary that the vehicle be transferred to standstill or perforce into emergency operation when selection lever signals are not coincident. Rather, even with different selection lever signals, the gear selection actually wanted by the driver can be realized on the basis of a consideration of plausibility rules.
It is especially preferred that, for like signals, the gear selection, which corresponds to the selection lever position, is determined. In this case, a fault-free detection of the selection lever position is present with high probability so that the plausibility considerations, which are advantageously used in other cases, are reduced to select the gear corresponding to the selection lever position.
The system of the invention is especially advantageously improved in that, for a first signal and a second signal, which correspond to different selection lever positions, a determination is made as to whether one of the signals precisely corresponds to an intermediate position of the selection lever and that, in the case that precisely one of the signals corresponds to an intermediate position of the selection lever, then the other signal is used to determine the gear selection. In this plausibility consideration, one proceeds from the situation that the driver has not brought the selection lever into an intermediate position but instead into an actually provided selection lever position. In this way, it is also probable that the selection lever position, which does not correspond to the intermediate position, is the selection lever position wanted by the driver so that this gear selection is realized in the transmission.
It is of special advantage when the system of the invention is further improved in that, for a first signal and a second signal, which correspond to different selection lever positions, plausibility rules are applied to determine the gear selection which are based on the evaluation of one or several secondary signals. Accordingly, it is not necessary to determine the probably desired gear exclusively on the basis of the different selection lever signals. Rather, additional signals, which are here characterized as secondary signals, are considered in order to realize the driver command.
In this connection, it is especially advantageous that the possible secondary signals belong to the group: turbine rpm, primary rpm, secondary rpm, output rpm, engine rpm, parking brake signals. In this way, numerous potential signals are available which can be taken into consideration in the plausibility considerations. If, for example, the selection lever position P for parking is outputted and the vehicle speed is greater than 10 km/h, then park position P would have to be evaluated as implausible.
The system of the invention is further advantageously improved in that, for a first signal and a second signal, which correspond to different selection lever positions, a fault signal is outputted and/or emergency measures are taken. A fault signal informs the driver and causes the driver to take countermeasures, for example, to drive to a service center. Further, the fault signal can function to be stored in a fault memory. Emergency measures can, for example, comprise limiting a torque.
In the system of the invention, it is especially advantageous that a signal, which corresponds to an intermediate position of the selection lever, is equivalent to the non-pressure of a signal corresponding to a selection lever position which is not an intermediate position. It is therefore basically not necessary to provide special intermediate position sensors in order to realize the present invention.
It can, however, also be useful that a signal, which corresponds to an intermediate position of the selection lever is explicitly determined via a sensor. In this way, one obtains additional information. If one proceeds with a non-present selection lever position signal that an intermediate position is present, then this assumption can be defective even when an omission of intermediate position sensors is especially economical with the view to the equipment of the vehicle. If, in contrast, one uses intermediate position sensors, then the nature and the tendency of the defective position signal are made clear and can be included in the evaluation.
The invention builds upon the class of the method in that the gear selection is determined based on the signals while considering plausibility rules. In this way, a shutdown or disablement of the vehicle can be avoided under some circumstances because the driver command can be determined with high probability notwithstanding different selection lever signals.
It is especially preferred that, with like signals, the gear selection, which corresponds to the selection lever position, is determined. Since in this case, a fault-free detection of the selection lever is present with high probability, the gear can be selected corresponding to the selection lever position.
The method of the invention is especially advantageously further improved in that, for a first signal and a second signal, which correspond to different selection lever positions, a determination is made as to whether precisely one of the signals corresponds to an intermediate position of the selection lever and that, in the case that precisely one of the signals corresponds to an intermediate position of the selection lever, the other signal is used to determine the gear selection. A condition precedent for this plausibility is that, with great probability, the driver does not tend to select an intermediate position. In this way, it can be assumed with great probability that the determined selection lever position corresponds to the driver command.
It is of special preference when the method of the invention is further improved in that, for a first signal and a second signal, which correspond to different selection lever positions, plausibility rules are applied to determine the gear selection which are based on the evaluation of one or several secondary signals. The method of the invention is very flexible with respect to the consideration of additional signals which can be included in the plausibility considerations.
In this connection, it is especially advantageous that the possible secondary signals belong to the group: turbine rpm, primary rpm, secondary rpm, output rpm, engine rpm, engine torque, parking brake signal. The latter are some examples of quantities which can be advantageously used in the context of the method of the invention.
The method of the invention is further advantageously improved in that, for a first signal and a second signal, which correspond to different selection lever positions, a fault signal is outputted and/or emergency measures are taken. A fault signal permits the driver to take measures, for example, to bring the vehicle into a service center. Likewise, a fault signal can be read into a fault memory in the context of the method of the invention. Emergency measures can, for example, include a limiting of torque.
In the method of the invention, it is especially advantageous that a signal, which corresponds to an intermediate position of the selection lever, is equivalent to the non-presence of a signal corresponding to a selection lever position which is not an intermediate position. Accordingly, it is not necessary to provide separate intermediate position sensors which is in the sense of an especially simple configuration of the system.
It can, however, also be useful that a signal, which corresponds to an intermediate position of the selection lever is explicitly determined via a sensor. With the explicit determination of the intermediate positions, the method is more complex but simultaneously also more reliable.
The invention is based on the realization that a plausibility of redundant selection lever signals can be carried out via the evaluation of different motor management signals and transmission control signals. On this basis, it is possible to continue to drive the vehicle without limitations as to driving comfort in that a still correct selection lever signal or gear selection can be applied while considering, for example, rpms. Likewise, it is in the context of the present invention to detect more than two selection lever signals and, accordingly, to undertake plausibility considerations with three or a plurality of selection lever signals.
The invention will now be explained with reference to the drawings wherein:
Furthermore, a hydraulic 66 is provided which is driven by a drive control 68. The hydraulic system includes a pump 70 which is operated by the motor 40 and therefore makes available the corresponding hydraulic pressure in the system. The following are driven by the hydraulics: the converter 42, the planetary wheel transmission 44, the adjustable conical wheel disc 52 on the primary end 46 of the continuously variable transmission 48 and the conical wheel disc 56 on the secondary end 58 of the continuously variable transmission 48. The driving of the transmission components via the hydraulics 66 takes place, inter alia, in dependence upon a selection lever position. In
In
In the situation illustrated, one generally proceeds in that the lower unit 13 outputs a defective signal while the upper unit 10 outputs a correct signal because it is generally not intended by the driver to select an intermediate position. Accordingly, the signal of the lower unit 12 is first ignored and the signal of the upper unit 10 is viewed as correct. Thereafter, it is still possible to initiate additional plausibility considerations which are explained hereinafter with respect to FIG. 3 and the Table.
In
S01: Start.
S02: Is the first selection lever position signal equal to the second selection lever position signal?.
S03: First selection lever position signal or second selection lever position signal in the intermediate position? If required, determine the selection lever position signal located in the intermediate position. Exemplary result: first selection lever position signal in the intermediate position.
S04: Ignore first selection lever position signal; view second selection lever position signal as correct.
S05: Consider plausibility of the selection lever position signal based on a table, that is, compare to various motor and transmission signals.
S06: Decision for the first selection lever position signal or the second selection lever position signal as correct. Output a fault signal. Under circumstances, emergency measures, for example, limit the motor torque.
The sequence starts in step S02. In step S02, a check is made as to whether an equality is present between the selection lever position signals. If this is the case, then it is assumed that the determination of the selection lever position is correct and the sequence goes back to step S01. If no equality is present, then a check is made as to whether one of the selection lever position signals corresponds to an intermediate position. If this is not the case, an immediate transfer to step S05 takes place. However, if, for example, the first selection lever position signal is in the intermediate position while the second selection lever position signal does not correspond to an intermediate position, then there is a transfer to step S04. There, the intermediate position signal is ignored and the second selection lever position signal is viewed as preliminarily correct.
Thereafter, there is a transfer from step S04 to step S05. In step S05, a plausability of the selection lever position signals can take place based on a selection table. In this plausibility, a comparison to different signals is undertaken, for example, to motor and transmission signals.
In the next step S06, a decision is made as to whether the first selection lever position signal or the second selection lever position signal is to be viewed as correct. Under circumstances, a fault signal is outputted and furthermore, emergency measures can be taken such as, for example, a limiting of motor torque.
In the following tables, the various conditions are shown which can be considered in the plausibility considerations. There are numerous other quantities conceivable which can be used in the context of the present invention with respect to plausibility. In the following, some especially usable examples are given.
TABLES
Selection
Lever
Motor Rpm
Turbine rpm
Primary rpm
Position
nmot
ntu
npm
P
not relevant
nmot > ntu > nmot-OFF-set
npm < threshold
(for example, 100/min),
ntu is slightly below the
motor rpm
R
not relevant
nmot > ntu > nmot-Off-set
detection of
(for example, 200/min),
rotation
ntu is slightly less than
direction
the motor rpm or is equal
reversal
to nmot, for miact >
threshold
Exclusion of Overrun
Operation
N
not relevant
nmot > ntu > nmot-Off-set
npm < threshold
(for example, 100/min),
or: |ntu-
ntu lies slightly below
npm| > threshold
the motor rpm
and accelerator
pedal = 0
D
not relevant
nmot > nru > nmot-Off-set
|ntu-npm| <
(for example, 200/min),
threshold
ntu lies slightly below
the motor rpm or is equal
to nmot, for miact >
threshold (excluding
overrun operation)
Selection
Lever
Output rpm = vehicle
Parking Brake
Position
speed nab = vfzg
Actual Torque miact
Signal B_brems
P
nab < threshold,
miact < threshold =
not relevant
vehicle at
f(nmot, tmot) ->
standstill
drag torque
R
0 < vfzg < threshold =
not relevant
f (miact) -> vehicle
rolls forward
downhill
(notwithstanding R),
or: vfzg < 0 vehicle
travels backwards,
in the event that
rotational direction
detection is
present, for
example, via ABS
wheel rpm sensors
N
not relevent
miact < threshold =
not relevent
f(nmot, tmot) ->
drag torque
D
for vfzg = 0
possible
(engine at idle):
consideration
miact = f(nmot, tmot),
of parking
engine power known
brake
The above description of the embodiments according to the present invention serves only for illustrating purposes and not for the purpose of limiting the invention. In the context of the invention, various changes and modifications are possible without a departure from the extent of the invention as well as its equivalents.
Luh, Joachim, Ries-Mueller, Klaus, von Haeften, Reinhard
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 7203587, | Oct 31 2003 | Aisin Seiki Kabushiki Kaisha | Shift lever operating position judging device |
| 7892142, | Jan 12 2007 | MAGNETI MARELLI POWERTRAIN S P A | Hydraulically servocontrolled transmission for a road vehicle provided with an internal combustion engine |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 6591173, | May 10 2000 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Operation control apparatus and operation control method having drive power adjusted in correspondence with a content of the detected abnormality and a torque request from the driver |
| 6722219, | Jul 14 1999 | LuK Lamellen und Kupplungsbau Beteiligungs KG | Transmission, shiftable in a track pattern |
| DE10027331, | |||
| DE10032907, | |||
| DE3735184, | |||
| DE4220247, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| May 29 2002 | Robert Bosch GmbH | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
| Mar 13 2003 | LUH, JOACHIM | Robert Bosch GmbH | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 014397 | /0333 | |
| Mar 14 2003 | VON HAEFTEN, REINHARD | Robert Bosch GmbH | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 014397 | /0333 | |
| Mar 17 2003 | RIES-MUELLER, KLAUS | Robert Bosch GmbH | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 014397 | /0333 |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Feb 17 2009 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
| Apr 15 2013 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
| Aug 30 2013 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Aug 30 2008 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Mar 02 2009 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Aug 30 2009 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Aug 30 2011 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Aug 30 2012 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Mar 02 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Aug 30 2013 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Aug 30 2015 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Aug 30 2016 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Mar 02 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Aug 30 2017 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Aug 30 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |