A tunable optical structure and devices based thereon for the compensation of chromatic dispersion in a multi-channel light signal are provided. The optical structure includes a waveguide and a bragg grating provided therein. The bragg grating has a plurality of grating components, each associated with one or a few of the channels to be compensated. The period of each grating component is selected to allow compensation of chromatic dispersion experienced by this particular channel or these particular channels, thereby taking into account the wavelength-dependent dispersion slope of the light signal. Tuning means are also provided in order to adjust the dispersion of the grating components to the required values.

Patent
   6941044
Priority
Jul 25 2001
Filed
Aug 28 2002
Issued
Sep 06 2005
Expiry
Jun 20 2022

TERM.DISCL.
Extension
94 days
Assg.orig
Entity
Small
3
28
all paid
1. A tunable optical structure for the compensation of chromatic dispersion in a light signal having a plurality of wavelength channels, each wavelength channel having accumulated a different chromatic dispersion, said optical structure comprising:
an optical waveguide having a light propagation axis;
a bragg grating provided in said waveguide across the light propagation axis, said bragg grating having a plurality of grating components, each of said grating components being respectively associated with a limited number of said plurality of wavelength channels of the light signal and having a characteristic spatially variable bragg wavelength selected to compensate for a given chromatic dispersion, said bragg grating defining a longitudinal refractive index profile in said waveguide as defined by the equation: n ( z ) = n eff ( z ) + i = 1 m Δ n i ( z ) sin ( 0 z 2 π p i ( z ) z + ϕ i )
where z is the propagation axis of the waveguide, neff(z) is the average effective index in the waveguide considered slowly varying along the propagation axis, m is the number of grating components in the bragg grating, Δni(z) is the spatially dependent index modulation amplitude of a ith grating component, pi(z) is the spatially variable period of the ith grating component and φ1 is a relative phase associated with the ith grating component; and
tuning means for tuning the spatially variable bragg wavelength of each of said grating components to compensate for the chromatic dispersion of the corresponding limited number of wavelength channels associated with a said grating component.
2. A tunable optical structure according to claim 1, wherein said tuning means comprise a temperature gradient inducing device applying a temperature profile on the bragg grating.
3. The tunable optical structure according to claim 2, wherein each said grating component is linearly chirped, and said temperature profile is linear.
4. The tunable optical structure according to claim 3, wherein, said waveguide is an optical fiber.
5. The tunable optical structure according to claim 4, wherein said temperature gradient inducing device comprises:
an elongated heat conductive member contacting said optical fiber along said bragg grating; and
first and second heat pumping elements contacting said heat conductive member at first and second points located on opposed side of said bragg grating, said first and second heat conductive elements maintaining said first and second points at predetermined temperature values T1 and T2.
6. The optical structure according to claim 5, further comprising first and second temperature sensors located at said first and second points.
7. The tunable optical structure according to claim 5, wherein said heat conductive member is a metallic rod having a longitudinal cavity therethrough, said optical fiber being inserted into said cavity.
8. The tunable optical structure according to claim 5, wherein said temperature gradient inducing device further comprises a heat sink connected to each of said first and second heat pumping elements.
9. The optical structure according to claim 5, wherein said first and second heat pumping elements are Peltier effect thermo-electric coolers.
10. The tunable optical structure according to claim 2, wherein each said grating component is linearly chirped, and said temperature profile is selected to adjust the chirp of each said grating component while maintaining linearity.

This application is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application No. 10/101,229, filed on Mar. 18, 2002, which claims the priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/307,365, filed on Jul. 25, 2001, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

The present invention relates to the compensation of chromatic dispersion occurring in waveguides such as optical fibers. More specifically, the invention concerns a tunable optical structure for dispersion compensation based on a Bragg grating, and operating at several wavelengths or Wavelength-Division-Multiplexing (WDM) channels.

In optical telecommunication systems, one of the many difficulties encountered is the chromatic dispersion of light signals propagating over long distances in optical fibers. The chromatic dispersion in non-dispersion-shifted optical fiber is nominally 17 ps/nm/km in the 1550 nm telecommunication window, but this value changes as a function of the wavelength: its value changes by about 2 ps/nm/km between 1530 nm and 1565 nm. Several single-channel dispersion compensators based on Fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs) have been proposed, and although this solution was demonstrated to be an appropriate solution for compensating the chromatic dispersion in a single WDM channel, for multi-channel systems, the spectral variation of the chromatic dispersion must be taken into account, especially for data transmission systems operating at high rates such as 10 and 40 Gbit/s. There is therefore a need for a broadband dispersion compensator that compensates for the chromatic dispersion but also for its spectral variation. This feature is often referred to as the slope compensation.

Fiber Bragg gratings are a well established technology for the fabrication of components for optical telecommunications, especially for WDM. Basically, a Bragg grating allows light propagating into an optical fiber to be reflected back when its wavelength corresponds to the grating's Bragg wavelength, related to its period. A chirped Fiber Bragg Grating, in which the Bragg wavelength varies as a function of the position along the fiber, represents a well known solution for compensating the chromatic dispersion of an optical fiber link (F. Ouellette, <<Dispersion cancellation using linearly chirped Bragg grating filters in optical wave-guides,>> Opt.Lett., 12, pp. 847-849, 1987; R. Kashyap, <<Fiber Bragg gratings,>> Academic Press, 458p., 1999). This spatially variable Bragg wavelength is defined as the product of twice the spatially variable grating period and the fiber effective index, which can also be spatially variable. Such a chirped grating compensates for the accumulated dispersion since the group delay varies as a function of the wavelength. An appropriate grating can be fabricated such that the wavelength dependence of its group delay is just the opposite of that of the fiber link. Different solutions based on FBGs have been proposed for broadband dispersion compensation but most of them do not include the slope compensation.

Referring to M Durkin et al. <<1 m long continuously written fibre Bragg grating for combined second- and third-order dispersion compensation>>, Electron. Lett. 33, pp 1891-1893 (1997) and J. F. Brennan et al. in BGPP 1999, pp.35-37, ultra-long FBGs, up to 10m, have been demonstrated for dispersion compensation over a large bandwidth. However, such devices suffer from high group delay ripples and do not allow an adjustment of the dispersion. The group delay of a compensator based on ultra-long FBGs is schematically illustrated in FIG. 1 (prior art). The chromatic dispersion the device compensates for is given by the slope of the group delay. The example shown in FIG. 1 has a dispersion of −1250 ps/nm and thus compensates for the chromatic dispersion accumulated over a 73 km long fiber link.

Sampled FBGs and Moiré FBGs have also been proposed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,384,884 (KASHYAP et al.) noteworthy for multi-channel dispersion compensation (see for example A. E. Willner, et al., <<Tunable compensation of channel degrading effects using nonlinearly chirped passive fiber Bragg gratings,>> IEEE J. of Selected Topics in Quantum Electron., 5, pp.1298-1311 (1999), U.S. Pat. No. 5,982,963 (FENG et al.); A. V. Buryak et al., <<Novel multi-channel grating designs>>, Proceedings of BGPP 2001; and M. Ibsen et al., <<Chirped moiré fiber gratings operating on two-wavelength channels for use as dual-channel dispersion compensators,>> IEEE Photon. Technol. Left., 10, pp.84-86, (1998)) in which the sampling function replicates a given dispersion function (M. Ibsen et al, <<Sinc-sampled fiber Bragg gratings for identical multiple wavelength operation>> IEEE Photon. Technol. Left., 10, pp.842-844, 1998). As a result, all the channels are identical and the resulting device cannot compensate for the dispersion slope. The group delay of such a compensator based on a sampled FBG is schematically illustrated in FIG. 2 (prior art). An approach for multi-channel slope compensation has been proposed based on interleaved sampled Bragg gratings in W H Loh et al. <<Sampled fiber grating based dispersion slope compensator>> Photonics Technol. Left. 11, no 10, pp 1280-1282 (1999). The theoretical approach is expected to suffer from significant practical difficulties associated with the control of the many micro-grating structures.

Single-channel non-linearly chirped FBGs have been proposed for narrowband dispersion slope compensation (J. A. R. Williams et al., <<Fiber Bragg grating fabrication for dispersion slope compensation>>, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 8, pp.1187-1189, 1996). In order to achieve operation over a broader range, multi-channel non-linearly chirped FBGs were proposed (Y. Xie et al., <<Tunable compensation of the dispersion slope mismatch in dispersion-managed systems using a sampled nonlinearly chirped FBG>>, IEEE Photon. Technol. Left., 12, pp.1417-1419, 2000). In this approach, the replicated bands of a sampled FBG have a different wavelength separation than the WDM channels, causing each channel to experience a different dispersion compensation.

In view of the above, there is need for a dispersion compensating device that takes into account the slope of the dispersion experienced by a broadband multi-channel signal.

In addition, critical factors such as changing traffic patterns, temperature fluctuations along the fiber, modulation format, component dispersion levels and dispersion variations in the transmission fiber (from manufacturing variances) affect dispersion compensation, especially at high bit rate. To accommodate these factors, 40 Gb/s systems require not only fixed, broadband slope-compensated dispersion-compensating devices, but also tunable dispersion technology to adjust the dispersion compensation in real-time for different WDM channels.

The wavelength of peak reflection for a Bragg grating can be shifted by a change in either the strain or the temperature (or both) imposed on the grating. If the grating is subject to a strain or temperature gradient, the modulation period of the index of refraction and the mean index of refraction becomes a function of position along the grating.

If a linearly chirped FBG is uniformly stretched, its period is changed, and accordingly the Bragg reflection wavelength is also changed, but the dispersion remains unchanged. A similar situation pertains if, instead of stretching the fiber, a uniform heating is applied to the grating. On the other hand, a non uniform heating, such as to produce a thermal gradient along the waveguide axis in the region of the grating, induces a chirp in the grating. Controlling the magnitude of the thermal gradient controls the magnitude of the resulting chirp, and thus there is provided a form of adjustable amplitude linear dispersion compensation device. Such a device is for instance described by different implementations described hereafter.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,671,307 (LAUZON et al.) discloses the use of a temperature gradient to impose a chirp on a FBG. By inducing a uniform linear variation of the local temperature over the length of the FBG, a slope variation of the time delay can be obtained, resulting in a variation of the dispersion compensation. The temperature gradient is realized by providing heat conductive means such as a thin brass plate to hold the portion of the fiber provided with the Bragg grating, and pairs of Peltier effect plates sandwiching each end of the fiber to selectively apply and dissipate heat to and from the ends of the fiber. Lauzon suggests that the device might be used as an accurately tunable dispersion compensator for optical fiber communication links, but does not disclose any practical manner of realizing such an embodiment. This purely thermal approach has the advantage of avoiding any stresses in the fiber.

Based on the same idea, European patent No. 0 997 764 (EGGLETON et al.) disclose an optical waveguide grating with adjustable chirp formed by a waveguide grating in thermal contact with an electrically controllable heat-transducing body which varies the temperature along the length of the grating. The heat transducing body, formed by example by a tapered film coating whose resistance varies along the length of the grating, can generate heat on the fiber to establish a temperature gradient along the grating.

It is also known in the prior art to use a plurality of localized heaters along the length of a chirped FBG to alter its properties in order to tune the chirp and to produce tunable dispersion compensators. U.S. Patent Application 2002/048430 (HASHIMOTO) present such an approach where an optical fiber is coupled to a succession of localized heaters mounted on a substrate. Linear temperature profiles are obtained which tune the dispersion in the linearly chirped FBG placed in close contact. The plurality of localized heaters can also be controlled such as to produce a non-linear temperature profile along the grating.

The previous embodiments refer to the application of a thermal gradient to a fiber Bragg grading. Similarly, if the waveguide is subjected to a stretching that is not uniform, but is such as to produce a strain gradient along the waveguide axis, then the effect is to produce a controllable amplitude of chirp. Imai (T. Imai et al., <<Dispersion Tuning of a Linearly Chriped Fiber Bragg Grating Without a Center Wavelength Shift by Applying a Strain Gradient>>, IEEE Jun. 1998, pp. 845-847) and U.S. Pat. No. 6,360,042 (LONG) describe devices in which a strain gradient is imparted to an optical fiber waveguide by bonding a portion of its length to a cantilever, and then bending that cantilever. U.S. Pat. No. 5,694,501 (ALAVIE) is another example of such a device in which a strain gradient is imparted to an optical fiber by cantilever bending and also by bonding it to the side of a stack of electrostrictive elements, and then applying a differential drive to those elements. The use of magnetostriction for grating chirping can also be used, as disclosed by U.S. Pat. No. 6,122,421 (ADAMS et al.). This patent discloses a programmable and latchable device for chromatic dispersion compensation based on a gradient magnetostrictive body bonded along the length of the fiber grating. In such a device, the magnetic field causes the body to expand or contract depending on the material. Alternatively, European patent no. 0 867 736 (FARRIES et al.) discloses a temperature-based device that combines the application of a temperature gradient and an optical strain to modify the optical properties of the grating. All of these devices however imply gluing the fiber to a metallic block along its entire length, which in practice is a technologically challenging operation.

The uniform stretching of an optical waveguide possessing a chirped Bragg grating with a quadratic component of its chirp can also induce a change in the linear dispersion afforded by the structure, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,982,963 (FENG) and Y. Xie et al., <<Tunable compensation of the dispersion slope mismatch in dispersion-managed systems using a sampled nonlinearly chirped FBG>>, IEEE Photon. Technol. Left., 12, pp.1417-1419, 2000. This approach allows a tuning of the dispersion but the spectral duty factor is limited to about 25%. Furthermore, this method relies on mechanical stretching which may cause fiber fatigue and degrade long-term reliability.

Another tunable dispersion compensator based on uniformly straining quadratically chirped FBGs is presented in U.S. Pat. No. 6,363,187 (FELLS) and in U.S. Pat. No. 6,381,388 (EPWORTH). In effort to combat the transmission penalty associated with a quadratic chirp, this patent uses the reflection in a second Bragg grating identical to the first, but oriented to provide a quadratic component of chirp that has the opposite sign to that of the first Bragg reflection grating, and with a substantially matched modulus.

All of the above prior art technique have there advantages and drawbacks, but none provides a simple optical structure which allows for the tunable dispersion and dispersion slope compensation of a multi-channel light signal.

It is an object of the present invention to provide a tunable optical structure allowing the compensation for both the chromatic dispersion of light signals and the dispersion slope.

Accordingly, there is provided a tunable optical structure for the compensation of chromatic dispersion in a light signal having a plurality of wavelength channels, each wavelength channel having accumulated a different chromatic dispersion. The optical structure includes an optical waveguide having a light propagation axis, and a Bragg grating provided therein across the light propagation axis. The Bragg grating has a plurality of grating components. Each grating component is associated with a limited number of wavelength channels, and has a characteristic spatially variable Bragg wavelength selected to compensate for a given chromatic dispersion. The optical structure also includes tuning means for tuning the spatially variable Bragg wavelength of each of the grating components to compensate for the chromatic dispersion of the corresponding limited number of wavelength channels.

In a preferred embodiment, the tuning of the spatially variable Bragg wavelength of the grating components is achieved by applying a temperature gradient to the Bragg grating.

Other features and advantages of the present invention will be better understood upon reading of preferred embodiments thereof with reference to the appended drawings.

FIG. 1 (PRIOR ART) is a graph of the group delay of a broadband dispersion compensator based on ultralong chirped Fiber Bragg Gratings.

FIG. 2 (PRIOR ART) is a graph of the group delay of a broadband dispersion compensator based on sampled chirped Fiber Bragg Gratings in which all the channels are identical.

FIG. 3 is a schematized representation of an optical structure according to a first preferred embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 4 is a schematized representation of an optical structure according to a second preferred embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 5 is a graphical representation of the reflectivity spectrum of light reflected by an optical structure according to the invention.

FIG. 6 is a graphical representation of the group delay slope for each channel reflected by an optical structure according to the invention.

FIG. 7A is a schematized representation of a multi-channel dispersion compensator according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 7B shows a variant to the embodiment of FIG. 7A.

FIG. 8A is a schematized representation of a multi-channel dispersion compensator according to another preferred embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 8B shows a variant to the embodiment of FIG. 8A.

FIGS. 9A and 9B respectively show the reflectivity and group delay spectra of a 12-channel third-order dispersion compensation grating; FIG. 9C is a graph where the dots represent the dispersion values obtained from a curve fit of the group delay while the solid line represents the target.

FIGS. 10A and 10B respectively show the reflectivity and group delay spectra of a 12-channel dispersion slope compensation grating; FIG. 10C is a graph where the dots represent the dispersion values obtained from a curve fit of the group delay while the solid line represents the target.

FIG. 11 is a schematized representation of a tunable multi-channel dispersion compensator according to yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 12 is a graphical representation of the group delay slope, under different tuning conditions, for each channel reflected by a dispersion compensator according to the embodiment of FIG. 11.

FIG. 13 shows the experimental reflectivity spectrum of light reflected by an 8 channel tunable dispersion compensator under different tuning conditions.

FIG. 14 shows experimental dispersion levels of a multi-channel tunable dispersion compensator for different channels.

The present invention provides an optical structure which can compensate for the chromatic dispersion accumulated by a light signal over a certain propagation distance, but also for the channel-to-channel dispersion variations.

A single-channel Bragg grating is described by its longitudinal index profile which can be written as: n ( z ) = n eff ( z ) + Δ n ( z ) sin ( 0 z 2 π p ( z ) z ) , ( 1 )

where z is the position along the axis of the waveguide, neff(z) is the averaged effective index (considered to vary only slowly along the axis), Δn(z) is the amplitude of the index modulation which can vary along the axis in order to include, for example, an apodization profile, and p(z) is the grating period, which can also vary along the axis. For commodity, the z axis is defined such that z=0 corresponds to the center of the grating.

A Bragg grating can compensate for the chromatic dispersion when it is linearly chirped, that is, when its period varies linearly along the z axis according to:
p(z)=po+α·z.  (2)

The grating reflects light having a wavelength equal (or close) to the Bragg wavelength given by:
λB(z)=2neffp(z).  (3)

The Bragg wavelength λB(z) varies along the grating when the period varies monotonously as a function of z. Light having a wavelength λB(z) is reflected by the grating at location z while light having a wavelength λB(z+Δz) is reflected at location z+Δz. With respect to the light of wavelength λB(z), the light of wavelength λB(z+Δz) is delayed in time by a group delay Δtg given by: Δ t g = 2 Δ z n g c , ( 4 )

where ng is the group index of the fiber and c is the light velocity in vacuum. The dispersion D is the wavelength derivative of the group delay. Assuming that Δz is small, D is given by: D = Δ t g λ B ( z + Δ z ) - λ B ( z ) = n g 2 c n eff 2 ( z p ( z ) ) . ( 5 )

In the case of p(z) given by Equation (2), the dispersion of the grating can compensate for reduces to: D = n g 2 c n eff 2 α . ( 6 )

Higher order dispersion compensation can also be taken into account by using a non-linearly chirped Bragg grating having a period given by:
p(z)=po+α·z+β·z2+γ·z3+  (7)

A multi-channel Bragg grating is basically a combination of several Bragg grating components and reflects light having a wavelength equal (or close) to several Bragg wavelengths. Its longitudinal index profile can be written as: n ( z ) = n eff ( z ) + i = 1 m Δ n i ( z ) sin ( 0 z 2 π p i ( z ) z + ϕ i ) , ( 8 )

where m is the number of grating components, Δni(z) are the spatially-dependent index modulation amplitudes, φi are the phases of each of the components and pi(z) are the spatially-dependent periods given by:
pi(z)=poii·z+βi·z2i·z3+  (9)

A multi-channel Bragg grating can be used as a broadband third-order dispersion compensator if the periods pi(Z) are properly chosen. Suppose that m channels centered at wavelengths λi must be compensated with dispersion values Di respectively. Assuming that intra-channel compensation is achieved at the second-order only, the periods pi(z) must be given, for i=1 to m, by: p i ( z ) = λ i 2 n eff + n g 2 c n eff 2 D i · z . ( 10 )

It can be noted that the relative component phases φi may be chosen arbitrarily, even randomly, or selected in order to minimize the maximum index value along the grating.

The present invention therefore provides an optical structure for the compensation of chromatic dispersion in a light signal having a plurality of wavelength channels, based on the principles explained above.

Referring to FIG. 3, there is schematized an optical structure 10 according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention. It includes an optical waveguide 12, such as a length of optical fiber, having a light propagation axis z. A Bragg grating 14 is provided in the waveguide 12, across the light propagation axis z. The Bragg grating 14 is made of a plurality of grating components (c1, c2, . . . cn). Each component is associated with a limited number of the wavelength channels of the light signal, a single one or a few, and has a spatially variable period chosen to compensate for the chromatic dispersion of this or these particular channels. In this manner, the dispersion compensation provided by the Bragg gratings takes into account the variations in dispersion experienced by each different channel. As one skilled in the art will readily understand, the limited number of channels is selected to include a few neighboring channels having dispersion characteristics close enough to be efficiently compensated by a single grating component. Typically, less than 10 channels would be an appropriate number, although a higher number could be considered if the properties of a given system allowed it. In the embodiments described hereinafter, each grating component will be considered associated with only one wavelength channel, for simplicity, but it is understood that the invention should not be limited to such an embodiment.

Preferably, the Bragg grating 14 defines a longitudinal refractive index profile in the optical waveguide 12 as defined by equation (8). As explained above, the relative phase φi of each grating component can be selected in order to minimize the maximum value of the longitudinal index profile n(z) along the propagation axis, or can be alternatively arbitrarily or randomly selected. Each grating component is preferably linearly chirped, and is preferably chosen according to equation (10). In the alternative, the grating components may be non-linearly chirped.

In the embodiment of FIG. 3, the grating components are superimposed and thereby form a compact structure. This may for example be achieved by using one different phase mask per grating component. As another example, the same Bragg grating may be manufactured by using a single phase mask, changing the Bragg wavelength by stretching the fiber and finely adjusting the chirp of each component using chirp adjustment techniques, such as for example disclosed in Y. Painchaud et al. <<Chirped fibre gratings produced by tilting the fibre>>, Electron. Lett., 31, pp 171-172 (1995); M. Cole et al., <<Moving fibre/phase mask scanning beam technique for enhanced flexibility in producing fibre gratings with uniform phase mask>>, Electron. Left. 31, pp 1488-1490 (1995); and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,903,689 (PAINCHAUD et al.) and 6,072,926 (COLE et al.). Another alternative would be to use holographic writing techniques which allow flexibility in the grating characteristics. A complex multi-period phase mask may also be used for an easy fabrication of the multi-channel grating. In the alternative the novel technique disclosed in a U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/101,522 to the same assignee, filed on Mar. 18th 2002 and entitled <<METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RECORDING AN OPTICAL GRATING IN A PHOTOSENSITIVE MEDIUM>>, could be used.

Referring to FIG. 4, there is illustrated another embodiment of the present invention where the grating components are concatenated, and may for example be manufactured using one of the techniques described above.

FIGS. 5 and 6 respectively show the reflectivity peaks of the resulting structure for each grating component, and their group delays. As may be seen, the group delay slope may be selected to be different for each channel in order to be tailored to the dispersion experienced by each particular channel.

Referring to FIGS. 7A, 7B, 8A and 8B, the present invention also provides a multi-channel dispersion compensator 20.

The compensator 20 includes an optical structure 10 as described above, that is an optical waveguide 12 having a light propagation axis z, and at least one Bragg grating 14 provided in the waveguide 12 across the light propagation axis z. In the embodiments of FIGS. 7A and 8A a single optical structure 10 is provided, whereas a plurality of them are shown in FIGS. 7B and 8B. Each Bragg grating has a plurality of grating components, each associated with one or a few of the wavelength channels and having a spatially variable period chosen to compensate for the dispersion of this channel (or these few channels).

The compensator 20 further includes an optical coupling device 22 coupled to the optical waveguide 12. The optical coupling device 22 has an input port 24 for receiving the light signal, an input/output port 25 for propagating it in the optical waveguide of the optical structure 10, where it is reflected by the Bragg grating, and an output port 26 for outputting the light signal reflected by the Bragg grating (or Bragg gratings).

In FIGS. 7A and 7B, the coupling device 22 is embodied by an optical circulator. In FIGS. 8A and 8B, it is embodied by an optical coupler such as a fused coupler. Any other device appropriate to perform a coupling function is considered to be within the scope of the present invention.

Superimposed grating components in which the chirp of each grating component is slightly different can be used as a third-order dispersion compensator. Referring to FIGS. 9A, 9B and 9C, there is shown an example of a multi-channel dispersion compensation grating that could compensate up to the third-order the dispersion accumulated over 50 km of SMF-28 fiber.

Superimposed grating components in which the chirp of each grating is different, can also be used as a dispersion slope compensator. Such a dispersion slope compensator is of interest in complement to existing broadband dispersion compensation devices such as Dispersion Compensating Fiber (DCF). The DCF compensates properly for one channel, but since its dispersion slope does not match the one of the transport fiber, an incomplete compensation occurs at the other channels. A dispersion slope compensator can then be used to precisely adjust the compensation of all the wavelength channels. For example, in 20 consecutive sections of 80 km of SMF-28 fiber each followed by 13.6 km of dispersion compensating fiber (DCF), the spectral variation of the overall dispersion is 36 ps/n m2. This variation is due to the fact that the DCF compensates for the dispersion but only for about 60% of the dispersion slope. FIGS. 10A, 10B and 10C show an example of a multi-channel dispersion compensation grating that provides such a dispersion variation.

In addition, to achieve a device in which the dispersion is different channel-per-channel, intra-channel variation of the dispersion can be taken into account. Instead of being linear, non-linear variation of the group delay as a function of the wavelength can be achieved. This can be of interest for intra-band slope compensation (see J. A. R. Williams et al. <<Fiber Bragg grating fabrication for dispersion slope compensation>>, IEEE Photon. Technol. Left. 8, pp 1187-1189 (1996)). Intra-channel non-linearity may also be desired for tuning applications (see A. E. Willner, et al., <<Tunable compensation of channel degrading effects using nonlinearly chirped passive fiber Bragg gratings,>> IEEE J. of Selected Topics in Quantum Electron., 5, pp.1298-1311 (1999), U.S. Pat. No. 5,989,963 (FENG et al.) and J. A. Fells et al. <<Twin fibre grating adjustable dispersion compensator for 40 Gbits/s>>, Proc. ECOC 2000).

The dispersion compensators of the above embodiments compensate for predetermined values of the dispersion slope, that is the spatially variable Bragg wavelength of each grating component is selected in view of the dispersion experienced by the corresponding channel in a known system. It could however by advantageous to be able to tune the compensator so that a same component may be use in systems having different characteristics. Tunability would also be beneficial to adapt the characteristics of a dispersion compensator in response to dispersion affecting factors such as changing traffic patterns, temperature fluctuations along the fiber, modulation format, component dispersion levels and dispersion variations in the transmission fiber from manufacturing variances.

Referring to FIG. 11, there is therefore illustrated a further embodiment of the present invention where a tunable optical structure 10 for the compensation of dispersion and dispersion slope is provided. The optical structure 10 includes a waveguide, here embodiment by a length of optical fiber 12, having a Bragg grating 14 therein. The Bragg grating 14 has a plurality of grating components as with the above embodiments. In the present case, the grating components are superposed as shown in FIG. 3. Each component has a central wavelength corresponding to a given wavelength channel, and a spatially variable Bragg wavelength selected to compensate for a given chromatic dispersion. The spatially variable Bragg wavelength is defined as twice the product of the spatially variable period of the grating component and the fiber effective index along this component, which can also be spatially variable.

Tuning means are provided for tuning the spatially variable Bragg wavelength of each of the grating components. The tuning can be achieved by applying a mechanical gradient or, as in the illustrated embodiment, by applying a temperature gradient. The temperature profile is appropriately selected to adjust the spatially variable Bragg wavelength of the grating components in order to obtain the dispersion slope compensation corresponding to the dispersion experienced by multi-channel signals in the optical system where the compensator is used. The temperature dependence of both the period and effective index must be taken into account in this appropriate selection of the temperature profile. Preferably, the grating components are linearly chirped, before tuning, and the temperature profile is linear. This will result in a slight non-linearity of the chirp of the grating components, due to the slightly non-linear temperature dependence of the Bragg wavelength. Alternatively, the temperature profile may also include a small non-linearity selected to produce a perfectly linear induced chirp.

Preferably, the grating components should all experience the same temperature variation, and therefore are affected in the same manner. The initial spatially variable Bragg wavelength of each component and the temperature profile should therefore be selected taking this factor into consideration. In the preferred embodiment, the grating components are superposed, automatically achieving this purpose. Alternatively, the grating components may be concatenated but arranged so as to be all subjected to the same temperature gradient, for example by looping the fiber between each grating component to superpose the portions of fiber provided with the different grating components.

FIG. 12 illustrates the above principle of tuning an optical structure according to the present invention. For each channel the dispersion slope is given a different value. Changing the tuning parameters simultaneously changes the slope of all of the channels in the same manner.

FIG. 11 shows an exemplary temperature gradient inducing device for use in the present embodiment of the present invention. A Bragg grating 14 here composed of a plurality of superposed grating components is provided in a length of optical fiber 12. The optical fiber 12 is preferably in close contact with an elongated heat conductive member called herein the natural gradient rod 30. This rod, preferably made out of a good metallic conductor, allows a uniform heat transfer along its length and thus creates a temperature gradient along adjacent fiber 12. The fiber can be coupled to this rod by numerous means, using for example a lateral groove with a thermal compound to improve thermal contact. In a preferred embodiment, the optical fiber 12 is positioned in the rod 30 such that the portion of the fiber containing the Bragg grating 14 is located at the center of the length of the rod 30.

In the illustrated embodiment the natural gradient rod 30 is shaped as a thin cylindrical tube, preferably made of a heat conductive metal, with a small hole along its longitudinal axis into which the fiber 12 rests freely. This preferred embodiment isolates the fiber 12 from surrounding perturbations. A thermal compound is not required, but could be used, to ensure a good replication of the temperature profile along the natural gradient rod 30 in the fiber 12. Moreover, the optical properties of the Bragg grating 14 remain unaffected by the contact between the optical fiber 12 and the natural gradient rod 30. Finally, long term reliability is increased since no mechanical stress is applied to the optical fiber 12 at any time. Within this preferred embodiment, the fiber 12 remains unaffected by the thermal expansion (or contraction) of the metallic rod 30, since they are not mechanically coupled to one another.

The natural gradient rod 30 shall be thermally isolated from the surroundings in order to ensure the linearity of the induced thermal gradient. A dewar type thermos system, with an inner shield to improve radiation isolation, can be used for this purpose. A low emissivity construction, using for example a rod with a mirror finish surface, will further improve the performance of the device.

Two heat pumping elements 32 are fixed in close physical contact at two point located at respective ends of the natural gradient rod 30, using an appropriate method like pressure mounting with a thermal compound, thermal gluing, or soldering. The heat pumping elements 32 are preferably Peltier effect Thermo Electric Coolers, referred hereafter as TECs. These elements pump heat from one side of their body to the other to fix the temperature of the extremities of the attached conductive rod 30 (T1 and T2), into which will settle a natural temperature gradient. In this particular approach, the temperature profile is linear. A non-linear profile may for example be applied using the technique disclosed in U.S. patent application 2002/048430 (HASHIMOTO), where the optical fiber is coupled to a succession of localized heaters mounted on a substrate.

On top of each TEC 32 is fixed a temperature sensor element 34, such as a thermistor or a resistance temperature detector (RTD), in close proximity to the natural gradient rod 30. These sensors 34 are fixed in close contact with an appropriate method, using for example a thermally conductive epoxy. Signals from these sensors are used as input to a servo control system (not shown) to precisely control, that is fix and maintain, the temperature at each end of the grating. Such means for temperature control are well known in the art, comprising appropriate control electronics and drive such as TEC controllers with PID servo-control for optimum dynamic operation.

Both TECs 32 are preferably directly mounted on a heat sink 36. The heat sink 36 may consist in a standard dissipative heat sink with fins or more simply in a large heat dissipation plate. It can even be the metallic casing of a packaged device. Alternatively, the TECs may be advantageously mounted on a thermally conductive metallic recirculation bar to improve the energy efficiency of the whole device. Such an assembly is for example shown in Canadian patent applications no. 2,371,106 and 2,383,807 (LACHANCE et al), both to the present assignee.

In order to change the optical properties of fiber grating 14, an appropriate thermal gradient is induced in the natural gradient rod 30 by setting temperatures T1 and T2 at its extremities with heat pumping elements 32. Referring to FIGS. 13 and 14, experimental results are shown for a tunable multi-channel dispersion compensator according to the present embodiment of the invention. FIG. 13 shows the reflectivity spectrum for a series of 8 adjacent WDM channels of 0.2 nm bandwidth centered on the 50 GHz ITU grid. Under all conditions the central wavelength remains centered on the ITU wavelengths by the preferred embodiment of the tuning method which keeps constant the central temperature of the rod of the thermal gradient inducing device shown in FIG. 11. FIG. 14 shows the variation of dispersion level (derivative of group delay) for each channel illustrating the global behavior of a multi-channel tunable chromatic dispersion slope compensator.

Of course, numerous changes or modifications could be made to the embodiments described above without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

Painchaud, Yves, LaChance, Richard, Lelièvre, Sylviane

Patent Priority Assignee Title
7711224, Sep 14 2007 TERAXION INC Colorless multichannel tunable dispersion compensator
9477036, May 21 2014 Teraxion Inc. Post-assembly wavelength-tuning method for an optical fiber filter
9941973, Aug 29 2016 Ciena Corporation Phase modulator with reduced residual amplitude modulation
Patent Priority Assignee Title
5007705, Dec 26 1989 United Technologies Corporation Variable optical fiber Bragg filter arrangement
5384884, Nov 08 1990 IPG Photonics Corporation Method of forming optical fibre gratings
5671307, Apr 10 1995 Universite Laval Use of a temperature gradient to impose a chirp on a fibre bragg grating
5694501, Nov 02 1994 JDS Uniphase Corporation Apparatus and method of bragg intra-grating strain control
5841920, Mar 18 1997 FURUKAWA ELECTRIC NORTH AMERICA, INC Fiber grating package
5903689, Nov 16 1995 Institut National D'Optique Method for spatially controlling the period and amplitude of BRAGG filters
5982963, Dec 15 1997 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, UNIVERSITY OF Tunable nonlinearly chirped grating
5987200, Oct 27 1997 WSOU Investments, LLC Device for tuning wavelength response of an optical fiber grating
6072926, May 16 1995 SOUTHAMPTON, UNIVERSITY OF Optical waveguide grating
6097862, Sep 11 1998 NOKIA US HOLDINGS INC Optical fiber grating devices with enhanced sensitivity cladding for reconfigurability
6122421, Sep 24 1998 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LIMITED Magnetostrictive wavelength-shifting devices and optical communication systems comprising same
6275629, Sep 11 1998 FURUKAWA ELECTRIC NORTH AMERICA, INC Optical grating devices with adjustable chirp
6317539, Sep 17 1999 Lumentum Operations LLC Interleaved sampled and chirped optical waveguide gratings for WDM channel operations and resulting devices
6351585, Oct 30 1998 FURUKAWA ELECTRIC NORTH AMERICA, INC Thermally adjustable optical fiber grating device with packaging for enhanced performance
6360042, Jan 31 2001 Tunable optical fiber gratings device
6363187, Aug 30 1999 RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC Chromatic dispersion compensation
6381388, Sep 01 2000 RPX CLEARINGHOUSE LLC Chromatic dispersion compensation
6411746, Jan 18 2000 Corning Incorporated Thermally tunable optical devices
6438277, Jun 03 1999 FURUKAWA ELECTRIC NORTH AMERICA, INC Stabilized thermally tunable optical waveguide devices and communication systems employing them
20010048788,
20020048430,
20030218124,
20030223687,
20040013364,
20040017971,
EP1061674,
EP10997764,
EP20867736,
//////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Aug 12 2002LELIEVRE, SYLVIANETERAXION INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0134860976 pdf
Aug 12 2002LACHANCE, RICHARDTERAXION INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0134860976 pdf
Aug 12 2002PAINCHAUD, YVESTERAXION INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0134860976 pdf
Aug 28 2002Teraxion Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Dec 12 2016TERAXION INC BDC CAPITAL INC MORTGAGE SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0408990390 pdf
Jul 29 2019TERAXION INC Canadian Imperial Bank of CommerceSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0500100398 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Jan 19 2009M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity.
Feb 14 2013M2552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Yr, Small Entity.
Feb 22 2017M2553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Yr, Small Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Sep 06 20084 years fee payment window open
Mar 06 20096 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Sep 06 2009patent expiry (for year 4)
Sep 06 20112 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Sep 06 20128 years fee payment window open
Mar 06 20136 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Sep 06 2013patent expiry (for year 8)
Sep 06 20152 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Sep 06 201612 years fee payment window open
Mar 06 20176 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Sep 06 2017patent expiry (for year 12)
Sep 06 20192 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)