Improved sampler apparatus and methods for dissolution testing include a controller that determines whether several different dissolution testing methods can be performed concurrently by the sampler and controls the sampler in response to the determination; fluid delivery apparatus adapted to pierce a septum and to deliver fluid to or from a collection receptacle through a first aperture, and to permit air flow to or from the collection receptacle through a second aperture; a syringe pump including a distributor having apertures through which fluid flows into and out of the pump chamber, the piston of the syringe pump being moveable adjacent the apertures; and/or a leak sensor responsive to the presence of spilled fluids.
|
1. A sampler adapted to operate concurrently in accordance with a first test method and a second test method different from the first test method, the first test method including withdrawing samples of fluid from each of a first set of vessels at a first set of time intervals and delivering the samples to a corresponding first set of collection receptacles, and the second test method including withdrawing samples of fluid from each of a second set of vessels at a second set of time intervals and delivering the samples to a corresponding second set of collection receptacles;
wherein the sampler includes a controller and a head having fluid delivery apparatus, the head and the collection receptacles being relatively positionable in response to signals from the controller to enable samples to be delivered to specified collection receptacles.
21. A sampler comprising:
a head having one or more fluid delivery devices, each device adapted to deliver one or more samples of fluid to one or more selected collection receptacles; and
a controller adapted to control relative positioning of the head and the one or more selected collection receptacles to enable the one or more samples to be delivered to the one or more selected collection receptacles, wherein:
the controller is adapted to operate concurrently in accordance with a first test method and a second test method different from the first test method;
the first test method includes withdrawing samples of fluid from each of a first set of vessels at a first set of time intervals and the one or more fluid delivery devices delivering the samples to a corresponding first set of collection receptacles; and
the second test method includes withdrawing samples of fluid from each of a second set of vessels at a second set of time intervals and the one or more fluid delivery devices delivering the samples to a corresponding second set of collection receptacles.
12. A method of operating a sampler, the sampler including collection receptacles and a head having fluid delivery apparatus, the head and the collection receptacles being relatively positionable to enable samples of fluid withdrawn from each of a set of vessels in accordance with a test method to be delivered to a corresponding set of collection receptacles, comprising:
determining whether operating the sampler concurrently in accordance with a first test method and a second test method different from the first test method would require the head and the collection receptacles to be in two different relative positions simultaneously, the first test method including withdrawing samples of fluid from each of a first set of vessels at a first set of time intervals and delivering the samples to a corresponding first set of collection receptacles, the second test method including withdrawing samples of fluid from each of a second set of vessels at a second set of time intervals and delivering the samples to a corresponding second set of collection receptacles; and
controlling operation of the sampler in response to the determination.
2. The invention of
3. The invention of
4. The invention of
5. The invention of
6. The invention of
7. The invention of
8. The invention of
9. The invention of
10. The invention of
11. The invention of
13. The invention of
14. The invention of
15. The invention of
16. The invention of
17. The invention of
18. The invention of
19. The invention of
20. The invention of
22. The invention of
23. The invention of
24. The invention of
25. The invention of
26. The invention of
27. The invention of
28. The invention of
29. The invention of
30. The invention of
31. The invention of
|
This nonprovisional U.S. national application, filed under 35 U.S.C. § 111(a), claims, under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e)(1), the benefit of the filing date of provisional U.S. national application No. 60/365,274, filed under 35 U.S.C. § 111(b) on Mar. 18, 2002, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference.
This invention relates to dissolution testing and, in particular, to sampling and sample handling methods and apparatus suitable for use in pharmaceutical product dissolution testing.
Dissolution testing and apparatus for performing such testing are known in the art. U.S. Pat. No. 4,279,860 (Smolen) and U.S. Pat. No. 4,335,438 (Smolen) provide descriptions of the art of dissolution testing. In general, dissolution testing is used to determine the rate of dissolution of a material in a solution. For example, dissolution testing may be used to determine the rate of dissolution of pharmaceuticals in dosage form in specific test solutions to simulate digestion in a human. Requirements for such dissolution testing apparatus are provided in United States Pharmacopeia (USP), Section 711, Dissolution (2000).
Conventional apparatus for dissolution testing of pharmaceutical products includes a dissolution unit having several dissolution vessels, in each of which a test solution and a dosage to be tested, such as a tablet, may be placed. After a dosage to be tested is placed in a test solution in a dissolution vessel, a stirring element in the test solution is rotated at a specified rate for a specified duration. An example of such a dissolution unit is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,589,649 to Brinker et al. Samples of the test solution may be withdrawn from the dissolution vessels at various times and delivered to an instrument for analysis to determine the degree of dissolution of the dosages as a function of time.
Dissolution testing of a product typically requires data from a number of dosages of the product, and requires analysis of measured volumes of test solution samples withdrawn at a number of different times for each dosage being tested. Systems commonly referred to as “samplers” have been developed to automate various aspects of the process of withdrawing samples of test solution and conveying the withdrawn samples to an analytic instrument. In such systems, samples and other fluids are conveyed by pumps through tubing lines which are selected by valves. Samplers have been developed which can accommodate testing several (e.g., 6) dosages of a product at the same time, automatically withdrawing samples of test solution from each dissolution vessel at a number (e.g., 19) of specified times. Such samplers automatically deliver withdrawn samples to collection receptacles, such as test tubes or vials, for temporary storage prior to analysis. Samplers may also automatically transfer samples from the collection receptacles to an analytic instrument at an appropriate time for analysis.
Samplers typically include a rack that can hold an array of collection receptacles for storage of collected samples, and a head at which a set of tubing lines terminates, the lines each being connected to a pump which services a particular dissolution vessel. The head and the array of collection receptacles can be relatively moved and positioned with respect to one another so that a particular withdrawn sample can be delivered to a particular collection receptacle for storage. Dissolution testing systems may also include the ability to flush, wash, and purge the tubing lines, and to replace test solution withdrawn from the dissolution vessels with fresh test solution (“media replacement”) and/or a portion of the withdrawn test solution that is not delivered to the collection receptacles (“media recycling”).
The operation of the pumps and valves and the positioning of the head with respect to the collection receptacles in such a system may be controlled automatically by a programmable controller. Such a controller may be programmed to carry out a predetermined procedure to effect a particular dissolution test method.
Existing samplers have several shortcomings. For instance, they can accommodate only a single dissolution test method at a given time. Also, a collected sample may be stored in a collection receptacle that is capped by a septum, and it can be difficult to deliver a sample to such a collection receptacle. For instance, delivering a sample whose volume is an appreciable fraction of the collection receptacle volume can generate a high pressure in the collection receptacle. Further, fluid leaks and spills may occur in a sampler, which can damage the equipment and can render dissolution test results invalid.
Problems of the prior art are addressed by improved sampler apparatus and sampling methods. In accordance with embodiments of one aspect of the invention, a controller for a sampler analyzes parameters of several different dissolution test methods to determine whether the test methods can be performed concurrently by the sampler. If not, the controller precludes performing the test methods concurrently, and may generate an output so indicating; if so, the controller controls the sampler to perform the test methods concurrently. In a preferred embodiment of this aspect of the invention, if the controller determines that the test methods cannot be performed concurrently by the sampler, the controller determines whether they could be if certain parameters of the test methods were varied, and if so, controls the sampler to perform the varied test methods concurrently.
In accordance with embodiments of another aspect of the invention, the sampler head includes fluid delivery apparatus adapted to pierce a septum, to deliver fluid to or from the collection receptacle through a first aperture, and to permit air flow to or from the collection receptacle through a second aperture. In a preferred embodiment of this aspect of the invention, the first aperture is within a first tubular needle and the second aperture is within the space between the first needle and a second tubular needle disposed coaxially with and radially outwardly from the first needle.
In accordance with embodiments of another aspect of the invention, the sampler includes a syringe pump, i.e., a pump having a piston that is movable within a cylinder. In a preferred embodiment of this aspect of the invention, the syringe pump includes a distributor having apertures through which fluid flows into and out of the pump chamber, and the piston is moveable adjacent the apertures.
In accordance with embodiments of another aspect of the invention, the sampler includes a leak sensor responsive to the presence of spilled fluids. In a preferred embodiment of this aspect of the invention, the leak detector includes a leak sensor having a pair of conductors that are spaced apart and insulated from each other, and electronic circuitry that is responsive to the electrical properties of the material adjacent the conductors.
The foregoing and other aspects, features, and advantages of the invention will become more fully apparent from the following detailed description, the appended claims, and the accompanying drawings in which:
The pumps in pump unit 104 operate together and pump fluid into or from sets of tubing lines that are selected by valves in pump unit 104. A set of tubing lines 106 is provided, each of which carries fluid between one of the dissolution vessels in dissolution unit 108 and one of the pumps in pump unit 104. A set of tubing lines 102 is provided, each of which carries fluid between one of the pumps in pump unit 104 and one set of a plurality of sets of collection receptacles in sample collector 100. A set of tubing lines 110 is provided, each of which carries fluid between one of the pumps in pump unit 104 and a replacement medium vessel 112 containing a fluid that may be delivered to the dissolution vessels to replace test solution withdrawn during testing.
Controller 130 controls operation of the sampler by signals transmitted between controller 130 and sample collector 100 over communication channel 120 and by signals transmitted between controller 130 and pump unit 104 over communication channel 124. Signals transmitted by controller 130 to pump unit 104 control the pumps and valves; for example, they may cause a sample to be withdrawn from each dissolution vessel and delivered to sample collector 100. Signals transmitted by controller 130 to sample collector 100 control, among other things, which fluid receptacles in sample collector 100 fluid will be delivered to or withdrawn from. For example, they may cause a set of samples withdrawn at a particular time to be delivered to a set of collection receptacles designated to receive samples taken at that time. Signals may also be transmitted between dissolution unit 108 and controller 130 over communication channel 122, for instance, to convey timing signals to cause or communicate the commencement of a test.
In the dissolution testing system of
Needle 740 includes a tubular inner needle 742 and a tubular outer needle 744 disposed coaxially with and radially outwardly from inner needle 742. Inner needle 742 and outer needle 744 may, for example, be made from stainless steel hypodermic needle stock of 20 gauge and 16 gauge, respectively. Inner needle 742 and outer needle 744 are adapted to pierce a septum when needle head 700 is lowered, so that the bottom ends 750 and 752 of both needles may be positioned within a capped collection receptacle. The axial space 760 within inner needle 742 communicates with a line 102 via a ferrule 732, provides an aperture through which fluid may be delivered to or withdrawn from a collection receptacle. Delivering fluid into a capped collection receptacle increases the pressure in it, which can be undesirable. The inclusion of outer needle 744 provides a second aperture 762, between the inner surface of outer needle 744 and the outer surface of inner needle 742, in which air can flow to equalize pressure inside and outside a capped collection receptacle when fluid is delivered to or withdrawn from the collection receptacle. Hole 746 in the wall of outer needle 744 is disposed so as to be outside a septum in order to vent air flowing from inside a capped collection receptacle through the space between inner needle 742 and outer needle 744.
Alternatively, instead of a disposing the second needle provided for venting a capped collection receptacle coaxially with the fluid delivery needle, a second needle for venting might be disposed parallel and adjacent to the fluid delivery needle. Mechanical considerations may make that alternative less preferable.
The upper end of each cylinder 1202 is disposed in the bottom opening of a top clamp 1206, which may be made of polypropylene. The lower end of each cylinder 1202 is disposed in the top opening of a bottom clamp 1212, which also may be made of polypropylene. Gaskets 1204 are provided to seal the joints between cylinders 1202 and clamps 1206 and 1212. Shoulders on clamps 1206 and 1212 enable cylinder 1202 to be captured between top plate 1100 and bottom plate 1102. A pair of O-rings 1214 received within circumferential grooves 1216 in each piston 1200 form a seal between a piston 1200 and its cylinder 1202. The lower ends 1218 of pistons 1200 are secured to a flange 1104 which, when raised and lowered by a mechanism driven by motor 1106, drives pistons 1200 upwardly and downwardly, respectively, within cylinders 1102. The pressure or vacuum created by axial motion of pistons 1200 within cylinders 1202 expels fluid from or draws fluid into the spaces above pistons 1200.
The upper end 1226 of clamp 1206 engages a distributor 1208 having three openings 1230 adapted to receive fittings 1210 coupled to the ends of tubing lines. Openings 1230 communicate via passages 1234 (
The pistons in both FIG. 13 and
The pump unit includes three valve arrays 1120, two of which are visible in FIG. 11. Each valve array 1120 receives one tubing line from each distributor 1208. Valve arrays 1120 are pinch valves which, when actuated, press upon tubing lines to stop flow.
In accordance with embodiments of another aspect of the invention, the sampler includes a leak detector. The leak detector preferably includes a leak sensor having electrical properties that change in response to the presence of fluid, and an electronic circuit coupled to the leak sensor that generates a leak-indicating signal when the electrical properties of the leak sensor correspond to the presence of spilled fluid. In a preferred embodiment, the leak sensor includes a pair of spaced conductors, and the leak detector includes electronic circuitry coupled to the conductors that is responsive to the electrical properties of the material adjacent the conductors. The presence of distributors and fluid couplings in the region above plate 1100 make it susceptible to leaks, and a leak sensor may desirably be disposed in that region.
As has been described, performing a dissolution test requires head 506 of sample collector 500 to move in the direction of arrow 504 to a particular position, for instance, to deliver samples withdrawn at a particular time to the correct row of collection receptacles in rack 508. In addition, base 502 may contain a row of receptacles for receiving excess fluid withdrawn from dissolution vessels so that the fluid can be recycled, or for receiving clean test solution used to wash the lines between samples. Base 502 may also contain a common rinse fluid receptacle in which needles may be dipped to rinse them in between samples. Such media recycling and rinse fluid receptacles would be located in the area of base 502 beneath head 506 in the position shown in
A dissolution test method includes specification, among other parameters, of the time intervals at which samples are to be withdrawn from a dissolution vessel. Parameters of a test method may be entered into a memory in controller 230 via a local data entry device such as a keypad or via a communication channel and, for repeated use, may be stored in and recalled from a nonvolatile memory. In addition to the time intervals at which samples are to be withdrawn from a dissolution vessel, such parameters may include the volume of test solution to be withdrawn, the volume of withdrawn test solution to be delivered as a sample, the volume of fluid to be used in flushing the lines, whether test solution is to be replaced or recycled, whether samples are to be transferred automatically from collection receptacles to an analytical instrument, and times and fluid flow rates at which these processes are to take place.
Parameters may be entered into a controller for a test method which the sampler is unable to execute, for example, due to insufficient time to complete one or more tasks within the time allotted for them. For instance, head 506 will be required to be at particular positions with respect to the collection receptacles in rack 508 within certain ranges of times with respect to withdrawal of a sample in order to perform particular tasks in connection with the sample, such as needle rinsing, sample delivery, and flushing of the lines. Movement of the head from one position to another takes time, the amount of which varies depending on the mechanical capabilities of the sample collector and the distance the head must move. The time necessary for a fluid withdrawal or delivery step depends on the volume and flow rate for the step. The aggregate time necessary for the sampler to move and pump in performing a task may conflict with the time requirements of the test method. In accordance with embodiments of another aspect of the invention, a sampler controller analyzes a test method and determines whether the sampler can operate in accordance with the test method. If not, the controller precludes the sampler from attempting to perform the test method, and may generate an output so indicating; if so, the controller controls the sampler to perform the test method. This process helps avoid commencing a test that cannot be completed according to the specified test method.
Although the time intervals at which samples are withdrawn from the dissolution vessels must be maintained, other parameters of a test method can be varied, such as the time at which samples are delivered to collection receptacles, and the time of ancillary steps such as flushing. For instance, when a sample is withdrawn from a dissolution vessel into the chamber of a syringe pump, the chamber provides temporary storage of the sample. The sample need not be delivered to a collection receptacle immediately; delivery can be delayed, so long as the length of the delay leaves sufficient time for all required tasks to be performed prior to the next sample withdrawal time. It may be possible to vary parameters of a test method such as sample delivery time and flushing time so that the varied test method can be performed by the sampler while maintaining the required sampling intervals.
In a preferred embodiment, if the controller determines that a test method cannot be performed by the sampler, the controller commences varying parameters of the test method, other than the time intervals at which samples are to be taken, in order to determine if a test method so varied can be performed by the sampler. If the controller determines that a test method so varied can be performed by the sampler, the controller controls the sampler to perform the varied test method. If the controller cannot determine any varied test method that can be performed by the sampler, the controller precludes the sampler from attempting to perform the test method, and may generate an output so indicating.
Independently operable pump units makes it mechanically possible for sample collector 500 to operate with dissolution units to perform tests concurrently using two different test methods. However, a particular pair of test methods cannot necessarily be performed concurrently, because they might impose conflicting requirements on the sampler, for instance, as to the position of head 506.
The bottom pair of timelines illustrates variation of the parameters of the test methods of from the upper pair of time lines to avoid requiring a sampler head to be in different positions simultaneously. The diagonal arrows indicate the adjustment of the times of certain flushing and delivery tasks. As varied, the test methods can be performed concurrently. It should be noted that the variations illustrated in
As discussed above, the design of a sampler establishes certain performance parameters such as how long it will take a head to move from one position to another, and how long it takes to perform a given task at a position. In accordance with embodiments of one aspect of the invention, a controller for a sampler determines whether a pair of test methods can be performed concurrently by the sampler. The determination may be based on the parameters of the sampler and of the test methods. If not, the controller precludes the sampler from attempting to perform both test methods concurrently, and may generate an output so indicating; if so, the controller controls the sampler to perform the test methods concurrently. Preferably, prior to determining if a conflict exists between a pair of test methods, the controller evaluates each test method as described above to determine whether the sampler can perform it.
In a preferred embodiment, if a pair of test methods cannot be performed concurrently by the sampler, the sampler commences varying parameters of one or both test methods, other than the time intervals at which samples are to be taken, in order to determine if a pair of test methods so varied can be performed concurrently by the sampler. If the controller determines that a pair of test methods so varied can be performed concurrently by the sampler, the controller controls the sampler to perform the varied test methods concurrently. If the controller cannot determine any varied pair of test methods that can be performed concurrently by the sampler, the controller precludes the sampler from attempting to perform both test methods concurrently, and may generate an output so indicating.
If two dissolution tests are to be performed concurrently, it may be desirable to start them at different times, and they may be completed at different times. To facilitate concurrent dissolution testing, instead of a single rack for receiving collection receptacles, a sample collector might accommodate a pair of separately removable racks. For instance, two racks, each half the width of rack 508 shown in
Reference herein to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment can be included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of other embodiments.
It will be further understood that various changes in the details, materials, and arrangements of the parts which have been described and illustrated in order to explain the nature of this invention may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention as expressed in the following claims.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10330691, | Mar 15 2013 | Abbott Laboratories | Light-blocking system for a diagnostic analyzer |
7331251, | Jun 22 2005 | Idaho State University | Dissolution testing of solid dosage forms intended to be administered in the oral cavity |
7585465, | Jun 15 2006 | Logan Instruments Corp. | Pharmaceutical product release rate testing device |
7914741, | Jan 10 2007 | Agilent Technologies, Inc | Automated microsampling dissolution test system |
8899101, | Feb 12 2010 | Riggtek GmbH | Apparatus for sample handling |
9513303, | Mar 15 2013 | Abbott Laboratories | Light-blocking system for a diagnostic analyzer |
9632103, | Mar 15 2013 | Abbott Laboratories | Linear track diagnostic analyzer |
9993820, | Mar 15 2013 | Abbott Laboratories | Automated reagent manager of a diagnostic analyzer system |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3802782, | |||
4120661, | Mar 03 1977 | Nihon Denshi Kabishiki Kaisha | Sampling device |
4279860, | Jun 25 1980 | Multiple injector flow through dissolution cell for dissolution testing apparatus | |
4299796, | Apr 11 1978 | VITAFIN N V, A CORP OF NETHERLANDS ANTILLES | Apparatus for performing tests and measurements on liquid samples |
4335438, | Apr 17 1980 | Method and apparatus for automatic dissolution testing of products | |
4578244, | Apr 23 1982 | PHARMACONTROL CORP | Sampling apparatus for obtaining a plurality of fluid samples |
4678639, | Mar 02 1984 | PERKIN ELMER LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY | Apparatus for periodically monitoring the composition of a plurality of samples |
5055263, | Jan 14 1988 | CYBERLAB, INC | Automated pipetting system |
5519635, | Sep 20 1993 | Hitachi Ltd. | Apparatus for chemical analysis with detachable analytical units |
5589649, | Feb 25 1994 | Distek, Inc. | Dissolution testing apparatus |
5849598, | Mar 15 1996 | Washington University | Method for transferring micro quantities of liquid samples to discrete locations |
6231813, | Sep 16 1997 | Life Technologies Corporation | Gel loading adapter |
6432365, | Apr 14 2000 | NEXUS BIOSYSTEMS, INC | System and method for dispensing solution to a multi-well container |
DE4222603, | |||
EP18092, | |||
EP1164200, | |||
EP206945, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Mar 18 2003 | Distek, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jun 27 2003 | BRINKER, GERALD | DISTEK, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 014296 | /0670 | |
Jun 27 2003 | CAI, MICHAEL | DISTEK, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 014296 | /0670 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jan 23 2009 | M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
May 10 2013 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Jun 13 2013 | M2552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Yr, Small Entity. |
Jun 13 2013 | M2555: 7.5 yr surcharge - late pmt w/in 6 mo, Small Entity. |
Mar 27 2017 | M2553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Yr, Small Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Sep 27 2008 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Mar 27 2009 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 27 2009 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Sep 27 2011 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Sep 27 2012 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Mar 27 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 27 2013 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Sep 27 2015 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Sep 27 2016 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Mar 27 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 27 2017 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Sep 27 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |