Various embodiments of the present invention are directed toward extending a federation of servers and balancing the data load of said federation of servers, in order to improve accessibility and scope of the system by moving the first backup data structure on the second server to the new server, creating a second data structure on the new server, and creating a second backup data structure for the second data structure on the second server. To balance the load, certain embodiments employ a method comprising suspending writes to the selected logical partitions, copying selected logical partitions to the new physical partition, redirecting reads and writes to the logical partitions in the new physical partition, and removing the original selected logical partitions. Alternative embodiments for balancing data load comprise the substitute steps of creating a temporary replication stream for the selected logical partitions to the new physical partition, copying selected logical partitions to the new physical partition, deconflicting inconsistencies in the logical partitions on the new physical partition, redirecting reads and writes for the selected logical partitions to the logical partitions in the new physical partition, and removing the original selected logical partitions that were copied to the new physical partition.
|
1. A method for balancing data load on a federation of servers, said method comprising:
determining a quantity of logical partitions to be moved to a new physical partition and selecting the specific logical partitions to be moved to the new physical partition, comprising:
dividing the total number of logical partitions by the total number of physical partitions to determine the quantity of logical partitions to be moved to the new physical partition; and
dividing the quantity of logical partitions to be moved to the new physical partition by the number of physical partitions less the new physical partition (the number of original physical partitions) and rounding down to determine the baseline number of logical partitions to be moved from each original physical partition to the new partition, and then selecting one additional logical partition per each of a subset of original physical partitions equal in number to the remainder;
suspending writes to selected logical partitions;
copying selected logical partitions to the new physical partition;
redirecting reads and writes for the selected logical partitions to the logical partitions in the new physical partition; and
removing the original selected logical partitions that were copied to the new physical partition.
11. A computer-readable medium for use with a federation of servers, said computer-readable medium comprising computer-readable instructions for:
determining a quantity of logical partitions to be moved to a new physical partition and selecting the specific logical partitions to be moved to the new physical partition;
dividing the total number of logical partitions by the total number of physical partitions to determine the quantity of logical partitions to be moved to the new physical partition; and
dividing the quantity of logical partitions to be moved to the new physical partition by the number of physical partitions less the new physical partition (the number of original physical partitions) and rounding down to determine the baseline number of logical partitions to be moved from each original physical partition to the new partition and then selecting one additional logical partition per each of a subset of original physical partitions equal in number to the remainder;
suspending writes to selected logical partitions;
copying selected logical partitions to the new physical partition;
redirecting reads and writes for the selected logical partitions to the logical partitions in the new physical partition; and
removing the original selected logical partitions that were copied to the new physical partition.
6. A system for balancing load on a federation of servers, said system comprising:
means for determining a quantity of logical partitions to be moved to a new physical partition and selecting the specific logical partitions to be moved to the new physical partition, comprising:
means for dividing the total number of logical partitions by the total number of physical partitions to determine the quantity of logical partitions to be moved to the new physical partition; and
means for dividing the quantity of logical partitions to be moved to the new physical partition by the number of physical partitions less the new physical partition (the number of original physical partitions) and rounding down to determine the baseline number of logical partitions to be moved from each original physical partition to the new partition, and then selecting one additional logical partition per each of a subset of original physical partitions equal in number to the remainder;
means for suspending writes to selected logical partitions;
means for copying selected logical partitions to the new physical partition;
means for redirecting reads and writes for the selected logical partitions to the logical partitions in the new physical partition; and
means for removing the original selected logical partitions that were copied to the new physical partition.
2. The method of
3. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
7. The method of
8. The method of
9. The method of
10. The method of
12. The computer-readable medium of
|
The present invention relates generally to the fields of data management, and more particularly to load and space balancing in a federation of data servers. The invention, however, is not limited to use in a federation of data servers; on the contrary, the invention could be used in a variety of other contexts related to distributed data storage.
A significant challenge of data management is to achieve both high scale and high availability while minimizing capital and operational costs.
In stateless data systems, such as web page servers where data is largely static (e.g., where reads are far more frequent than writes), one solution (referred to herein as the “distributed copy method”) is to produce many identical copies (hereinafter “copies”) of the “master data” (hereinafter “master”), store these copies in different accessible locations (e.g., a federation of servers), and then enable users to read-access any of the copies directly. When changes to the data are required, such changes are made to the master and are eventually (and perhaps automatically) propagated to all of the copies. While changes to the master may take time to propagate to each of the copies—and certain users may in fact access outdated data during this intervening period—this is an acceptable tradeoff to achieve high scale and high availability for data that is stateless. System-wide scale and availability can be achieved by adding more servers with additional copies thereon, and greater scale is achieved because now the data system can route a data request to one of the increased number of copies.
In stateful data systems, such as SQL server systems where data is dynamic (e.g., where reads and writes are logically and temporally intertwined, and a subsequent read may be logically related to a previous write), the distributed readable copy method is inadequate. For example, in a stateful system comprising one master and many copies, and wherein changes (writes) to the data are frequent, any change written to the master (or directly to a copy if such functionality is allowed) must be fully propagated across all of the copies before further processing of the data (master or copy) can occur. However, as is well-known and appreciated by those of a skill in the relevant art, this brute force approach to real-time updating of the data would consume too many resources and therefore have a significant negative impact on overall system performance. Furthermore, given the high volumes of data and/or high transaction rates of many stateful systems, maintaining numerous identical copies of all the data in various locations is neither technically nor economically feasible. Moreover, unlike stateless data systems where adding a new server and putting a new copy of the master data thereon immediately increases the scale of the system, utilization of a new server in a federation of servers for a stateful data system requires a more inventive approach.
There has been a long-felt need in the art for the development of a stateful data management system that can achieve both high scale and high availability while continuing to minimize capital and operational costs. The present invention provides solutions to meet this need.
Various embodiments of the present invention are directed toward extending a federation of servers and balancing the data load of said federation of servers, in order to improve accessibility and scope of the system by moving the first backup data structure on the second server to the new server, creating a second data structure on the new server, and creating a second backup data structure for the second data structure on the second server. To balance the load, certain embodiments employ a method comprising suspending writes to the selected logical partitions, copying selected logical partitions to the new physical partition, redirecting reads and writes to the logical partitions in the new physical partition, and deleting the selected logical partitions from the original physical partition. Alternative embodiments for balancing data load comprise the substitute steps of creating a temporary replication stream for the selected logical partitions to the new physical partition, copying selected logical partitions to the new physical partition, deconflicting inconsistencies in the logical partitions on the new physical partition, redirecting reads and writes for the selected logical partitions to the logical partitions in the new physical partition, and removing the original selected logical partitions that were copied to the new physical partition.
The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of preferred embodiments, is better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings.
For the purpose of illustrating the invention, there is shown in the drawings exemplary constructions of the invention; however, the invention is not limited to the specific methods and instrumentalities disclosed. In the drawings:
Introduction and Overview
Various embodiments of the present invention comprise systems, methods, and products for extending the capacity of a federation of servers comprising at least two servers, wherein a first set of data in a first data structure (for example, and without limitation, a database, set of files, collection of data) is stored on a first server, and a backup of the first set of data in a first backup data structure is stored on a second server. Many of the aforementioned embodiments comprise the steps of adding a new server; moving the first backup data structure on the second server to the new server; creating a second data structure on the new server; and creating a second backup data structure for the second data structure on the second server. The first data structure and the first backup data structure together comprise a first physical partition, and the second data structure and the second backup data structure comprise a second physical partition. Moreover, each physical partition comprises a plurality of logical partitions which, in turn, comprise a subset of the data in the data structures.
Other embodiments of the present invention comprise systems, methods, and products for balancing data load on the federation of servers extended by the technique described above and comprise the steps of determining a quantity of logical partitions to be moved to the new physical partition and selecting the specific logical partitions to be moved; suspending writes to the selected logical partitions; copying selected logical partitions to the new physical partition; redirecting reads and writes to the logical partitions in the new physical partition; and removing the original selected logical partitions.
Alternative embodiments for balancing data load on the federation of servers are also herein disclosed and comprise the steps of determining a quantity of logical partitions to be moved to the new physical partition and selecting the specific logical partitions to be moved; creating a temporary replication stream for the selected logical partitions to the new physical partition; copying selected logical partitions to the new physical partition; deconflicting inconsistencies in the logical partitions on the new physical partition; redirecting reads and writes for the selected logical partitions to the logical partitions in the new physical partition; and removing the original selected logical partitions that were copied to the new physical partition.
These various embodiments are described more fully herein below. The subject matter is described with specificity to meet statutory requirements. However, the description itself is not intended to limit the scope of this patent. Rather, the inventors have contemplated that the claimed subject matter might also be embodied in other ways, to include different steps or combinations of steps similar to the ones described in this document, in conjunction with other present or future technologies. For example, the term “data structure” used herein is intended to have the broadest meaning and, for purposes of this application, expressly includes any database, set of files, or collection of data regardless of structure or form.
Moreover, although the term “step” is used herein to connote different elements of methods employed, the term should not be interpreted as implying any particular order among or between various steps herein disclosed unless and except when the order of individual steps is explicitly described.
Computer Environment
Numerous embodiments of the present invention may execute on a computer.
As shown in
A number of program modules may be stored on the hard disk, magnetic disk 29, optical disk 31, ROM 24 or RAM 25, including an operating system 35, one or more application programs 36, other program modules 37 and program data 38. A user may enter commands and information into the personal computer 20 through input devices such as a keyboard 40 and pointing device 42. Other input devices (not shown) may include a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite disk, scanner or the like. These and other input devices are often connected to the processing unit 21 through a serial port interface 46 that is coupled to the system bus, but may be connected by other interfaces, such as a parallel port, game port or universal serial bus (USB). A monitor 47 or other type of display device is also connected to the system bus 23 via an interface, such as a video adapter 48. In addition to the monitor 47, personal computers typically include other peripheral output devices (not shown), such as speakers and printers. The exemplary system of
The personal computer 20 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer 49. The remote computer 49 may be another personal computer, a server, a router, a network PC, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described above relative to the personal computer 20, although only a memory storage device 50 has been illustrated in
When used in a LAN networking environment, the personal computer 20 is connected to the LAN 51 through a network interface or adapter 53. When used in a WAN networking environment, the personal computer 20 typically includes a modem 54 or other means for establishing communications over the wide area network 52, such as the Internet. The modem 54, which may be internal or external, is connected to the system bus 23 via the serial port interface 46. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to the personal computer 20, or portions thereof, may be stored in the remote memory storage device. It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used.
While it is envisioned that numerous embodiments of the present invention are particularly well-suited for computerized systems, nothing in this document is intended to limit the invention to such embodiments. On the contrary, as used herein the term “computer system” is intended to encompass any and all devices comprising press buttons, or capable of determining button presses, or the equivalents of button presses, regardless of whether such devices are electronic, mechanical, logical, or virtual in nature.
Network Environment
The network may include client computers 20a, a server computer 20b, data source computers 20c, and data structures 70, 72a, and 72b. The client computers 20a and the data source computers 20c are in electronic communication with the server computer 20b via communications network 80, e.g., an Intranet. Client computers 20a and data source computers 20c are connected to the communications network by way of communications interfaces 82. Communications interfaces 82 can be any one of the well-known communications interfaces such as Ethernet connections, modem connections, and so on.
Server computer 20b provides management of data structure 70 by way of data structure server system software, described more fully below. As such, server 20b acts as a storehouse of data from a variety of data sources and provides that data to a variety of data consumers.
In the example of
Overview of the Data Structure
In many embodiments of the present invention, the collective data (“Data”) of a stateful data system (“System”) is divided into a large fixed number of logical partitions, and these numerous logical partitions are then distributed across a smaller but variable number of physical partitions (such that each physical partition contains a large but relatively equal number of logical partitions). Each physical partition may comprise a number of data structures equal to the “redundancy level” of the Data, the first such data structure for each such physical partition being the primary data structure, and the other data structures (if any) constituting backup data structures to maintain identical copies of the primary data structure. The redundancy level of the Data is the fixed number of copies of data that are maintained in the System; for example, if the Data comprises primary data and two backup copies thereof, then the redundancy level is equal to three and, thus, each physical partition would comprise three data structures. In certain embodiments, the redundancy level may also be considered to be the minimum number of servers required for the System. In any event, the minimum redundancy level is one, in which case the scaling and load balancing benefits described later herein are utilized independent of the foregoing method for extending the System to increase availability.
Logical partitions comprise the primary data and corresponding backup data for a relatively small subset of the Data and thereby comprise the smallest amount of data moved in the System at any given time. By dividing the Data into a large number of logical partitions, the percentage of Data in the System being moved at any given time is quite small. For example, if a System utilizes 20,000 logical partitions, then only 0.005% of the data might participate in the move process, thus minimizing the additional load due to rebalancing and any possible impact on availability. In any event, the maximum possible number of logical partitions is equal to the number of items in the Data.
Physical partitions comprise physical storage components across a number of servers equal to the redundancy level of the Data. For numerous embodiments of the present invention, the number of physical partitions corresponds to the number of servers in a system, these servers together comprising “a federation of servers” for that system. Moreover, as will become clear later herein, it is important to note that the number of physical partitions in such embodiments will change—increase or decrease—as the number of servers in the System change. In any case, physical partitions comprise one primary data structure that resides on one server (that physical partitions's “primary server”), and a number of backup data structures, one less than the redundancy of the data, that reside on other servers to achieve true data redundancy and thereby protect accessibility against single-server failures.
Extending the Data System
In many embodiments of the present invention, the Data, servers, physical partitions, logical partitions, and various primary and backup data structures together comprise an interrelated structure inherent to the System.
In this figure, a simple stateful data system (“System”) comprises two servers: Server A and Server B. Server A comprises data structures P1 and S2; and Server B comprises data structures P2 and S1. Data structure P1, a primary data structure, and data structure S1, the secondary data structure (and the backup copy of data structure P1), together comprise physical partition X1. Likewise, data structure P2, a primary data structure, and data structure S2, the secondary data structure (and the backup copy of data structure P2), together comprise physical partition X2. The servers in this embodiment, like those in other embodiments, may be physically located in geographically disparate locations in order to enhancing the availability of the Data in the event of a catastrophic event such as fire, earthquake, flood, tornado, hurricane, and so and so forth; as such, nothing herein is intended to limit the servers of any embodiment to having to occupy a common geographic location.
Physical partition X1, and its data structures P1 and S1, comprise logical partitions LP1, LP2, and LP3, the primary data of which is stored in the P1 data structure and the identical backup or secondary data of which is stored in the S1 data structure. Likewise, physical partition X2, and its data structures P2 and S2, comprise logical partitions LP4, LP5, and LP6, the primary data of which is stored in the P2 data structure and the identical backup or secondary data of which is stored in the S2 data structure. It is also important to note that, for example, logical partition LP1 comprises both the primary component located in data structure P1 (the primary data) and the backup component located in data structure S1 (the secondary data). Since primary data structures and secondary (backup) data structures are not stored on the same server, each logical partition for this set of embodiments necessarily comprises data located on more than one server. For example, if logical partition L1 has primary data in primary data structure P1 on Server A, then logical partition L1 also has secondary data in secondary data structure S1 on Server B. In other alternative embodiments, S1 and S2 could be located on separate servers C and D (not shown).
To increase both accessibility and scale of the System disclosed in
Physical partition X1 (not shown), and its data structures P1 and S1, comprise logical partitions LP1, LP2, and LP3, the primary data of which is stored in the P1 data structure and the identical backup or secondary data of which is stored in the S1 data structure. Likewise, physical partition X2 (not shown), and is data structures P2 and S2, comprise logical partitions LP4, LP5, and LP6, the primary data of which is stored in the P2 data structure and the identical backup or secondary data of which is stored in the S2 data structure. Therefore the logical partition LP1, for example, comprises both the component shown located in data structure P1 (the primary data) and the component shown located in data structure S1 (the secondary data); the other logical partitions LP2–LP6 are similarly structured.
In this configuration, Server A and Server B are being actively utilized by the System while Server C is not. In the present set of embodiments, Server C is a new server that has been recently added to the System. In alternative embodiments, however, Server C might also be an existing server that is not being presently utilized by the System for any of a variety of reasons. And, as previously noted, for each physical partition, the primary data structure and the secondary data structure do not reside on the same server. Locating these data structures on different servers increases data accessibility by ensuring that, if the server having the primary data structure fails, the data is still accessible on the server hosting the secondary data structure.
To balance the load on Server A and Server B across all three servers in the System, the System must first extend the capacity of the System across all three servers. Extending the capacity of the System comprises the steps illustrated by the flowchart of
In the first step 402 of
As will be appreciated by those of skill in the relevant art, these data structure moves can be accomplished by a variety of well-known methods resulting in minimal performance impact to the System. Moreover, the order of the steps described above can be arranged in any order so long as the selected existing secondary data structure (in this case, data structure S2 on Server A) is moved to the new server before the new secondary data structure (in this case, S3 on Server A) is created on Server A.
Balancing the Data Load
After extending the capacity of a System in certain embodiments, the load can then be balanced by one of two methods illustrated by the flowcharts of
Similarly, there are various techniques for determining which logical partitions to move, some of which may be based on dynamic considerations such as response latency, CPU load, IO queue depth, and so forth. Many of these techniques are utilized to address “hot spots,” or asymmetric access to subsets of data, and are well known to those of skill in the art. Various embodiments of the present invention anticipate the utilization of any and all of these various techniques, and thus nothing herein should be interpreted as confining or limiting the invention to the specific techniques—the static techniques described in this specification and the claims—that are used by the embodiments described in detail herein.
Consistent with the foregoing analysis applied to the present embodiments, the system might move logical partitions L3 and L6 to new physical partition X3 for the embodiments described herein below. Of course any one of the logical partitions L1, L2, or L3 could have been selected from physical partition X1, and the same holds true for the one logical partition selected to be moved from physical partition X2. Moreover, in certain embodiments of the present method herein described, logical partitions L3 and L6 may be moved separately (one at a time) in order to provide maximum percentage availability of the Data and minimize the number of logical partitions to which writes are suspended to just one such logical partition at any given time during the move.
In order to maintain data consistency during any move process, it is important to either (a) prevent changes (writes) to the data during the short periods the data is being moved, or (b) to ensure that changes are reflected and deconflicted following any such move. The suitability of the specific method employed generally depends on the nature of the System: the former method is best applied to “single-master” System embodiments, whereas the latter method is best applied to “multi-master” System embodiments. Each method is discussed below.
Single-Master System Method
A single-master system embodiment only allows changes (writes) to the primary data structure. By restricting rights to this single location, the System need only update the backup data structures by immediately streaming the changes made to the primary data structure to the backup data structures. By preserving the integrity of the data during the move, the single-master method does not require any conflict reconciliation for data changes that might otherwise occur during the move and not be immediately reflected in the data. However, it is important to note a limitation of the single-master method is that, since it temporarily prevents writes to the data being moved, the multi-master method is the preferred method for any embodiment that requires full-time, no-interruption changeability (writeability) of the entire body of Data.
Focusing solely on the logical partitions and the physical partitions,
After changes to the data of logical partitions L3 and L6 are suspended, and at step 606 of
To put the end result of this process into perspective, and referring to
Multi-Master System Method
A multi-master System embodiment, unlike the single-master method, always allows and accepts changes to the data, even during the move, by replicating the changes received and applied at the old data location and applying them a second time to the new data location. Any conflicts arising from this twice-written approach are then resolved in the new data location once the move is completed by one of many methodologies known and appreciated by those of skill in the relevant art. Moreover, while the single-master method is not compatible with a multi-master System, the multi-master method is always compatible with a single-master system but is unlikely to be more efficient in most (if not all) single-master embodiments because of the need to reconcile any inconsistencies in the data following the move.
To conduct the move in a multi-master system, the next step, step 904 of
After the replication streams are established, at step 906 and as further illustrated in
In regard to copying the logical partitions L3 and L6 to the new physical partition X3, it should again be noted that the data was copied to the primary data structure of the new physical partition on Server C and the secondary data structure on Server A to ensure enhanced accessibility in the event of a single server failure.
The various techniques described herein may be implemented with hardware or software or, where appropriate, with a combination of both. Thus, the methods and apparatus of the present invention, or certain aspects or portions thereof, may take the form of program code (i.e., instructions) embodied in tangible media, such as floppy diskettes, CD-ROMs, hard drives, or any other machine-readable storage medium, wherein, when the program code is loaded into and executed by a machine, such as a computer, the machine becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention. In the case of program code execution on programmable computers, the computer will generally include a processor, a storage medium readable by the processor (including volatile and non-volatile memory and/or storage elements), at least one input device, and at least one output device. One or more programs are preferably implemented in a high level procedural or object oriented programming language to communicate with a computer system. However, the program(s) can be implemented in assembly or machine language, if desired. In any case, the language may be a compiled or interpreted language, and combined with hardware implementations.
The methods and apparatus of the present invention may also be embodied in the form of program code that is transmitted over some transmission medium, such as over electrical wiring or cabling, through fiber optics, or via any other form of transmission, wherein, when the program code is received and loaded into and executed by a machine, such as an EPROM, a gate array, a programmable logic device (PLD), a client computer, a video recorder or the like, the machine becomes an apparatus for practicing the invention. When implemented on a general-purpose processor, the program code combines with the processor to provide a unique apparatus that operates to perform the indexing functionality of the present invention.
While the present invention has been described in connection with the preferred embodiments of the various figures, it is to be understood that other similar embodiments may be used or modifications and additions may be made to the described embodiment for performing the same function of the present invention without deviating there from. For example, while exemplary embodiments of the invention are described in the context of digital devices emulating the functionality of personal computers, one skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention is not limited to such digital devices, as described in the present application may apply to any number of existing or emerging computing devices or environments, such as a gaming console, handheld computer, portable computer, etc. whether wired or wireless, and may be applied to any number of such computing devices connected via a communications network, and interacting across the network. Furthermore, it should be emphasized that a variety of computer platforms, including handheld device operating systems and other application specific operating systems, are herein contemplated, especially as the number of wireless networked devices continues to proliferate. Therefore, the present invention should not be limited to any single embodiment, but rather construed in breadth and scope in accordance with the appended claims.
Shutt, David R., Nichols, Elizabeth Ann
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10169383, | Mar 22 2005 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for scrubbing data within a data storage subsystem |
10394672, | Jun 28 2005 | International Business Machines Corporation | Cluster availability management |
10936223, | Mar 22 2018 | International Business Machines Corporation | Increasing serial read performance |
11755435, | Jun 28 2005 | International Business Machines Corporation | Cluster availability management |
7308543, | Mar 22 2005 | GOOGLE LLC | Method and system for shredding data within a data storage subsystem |
7509392, | Mar 24 2005 | International Business Machines Corporation | Creating and removing application server partitions in a server cluster based on client request contexts |
7743372, | Jun 28 2005 | Internatinal Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic cluster code updating in logical partitions |
7774785, | Jun 28 2005 | International Business Machines Corporation | Cluster code management |
7937616, | Jun 28 2005 | International Business Machines Corporation | Cluster availability management |
7987152, | Oct 03 2008 | Federation of clusters for enterprise data management | |
8347307, | Mar 12 2008 | ServiceNow, Inc | Method and system for cost avoidance in virtualized computing environments |
8700752, | Nov 03 2009 | ServiceNow, Inc | Optimized efficient LPAR capacity consolidation |
8745011, | Mar 22 2005 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for scrubbing data within a data storage subsystem |
9208182, | Mar 22 2005 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for scrubbing data within a data storage subsystem |
9892136, | Mar 22 2005 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for scrubbing data within a data storage subsystem |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5991804, | Jun 20 1997 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Continuous media file server for cold restriping following capacity change by repositioning data blocks in the multiple data servers |
6108703, | Jul 14 1998 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Global hosting system |
6314503, | Dec 30 1998 | EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC | Method and apparatus for managing the placement of data in a storage system to achieve increased system performance |
6718361, | Apr 07 2000 | NetApp, Inc | Method and apparatus for reliable and scalable distribution of data files in distributed networks |
6779078, | May 24 2000 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Data storage system and method of hierarchical control thereof |
6785792, | Jun 22 2001 | NEC Corporation | Storage system and data relocation method |
6895483, | May 27 2002 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Method and apparatus for data relocation between storage subsystems |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
May 23 2003 | SHUTT, DAVID R | Microsoft Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 014122 | /0883 | |
May 23 2003 | NICHOLS, ELIZABETH ANN | Microsoft Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 014122 | /0883 | |
May 27 2003 | Microsoft Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Oct 14 2014 | Microsoft Corporation | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 034541 | /0477 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
May 06 2009 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Mar 18 2013 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
May 25 2017 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Dec 06 2008 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jun 06 2009 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 06 2009 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Dec 06 2011 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Dec 06 2012 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jun 06 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 06 2013 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Dec 06 2015 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Dec 06 2016 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jun 06 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 06 2017 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Dec 06 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |